CGC President & Head Grader On 9.9's, JSA, & The Grading Process - Matt Nelson - Swagglecast 016

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 июл 2024
  • In this video we have our next video podcast episode of "Swagglecast."
    Today's guest is CGC President and Head Grader MATT NELSON
    www.cgccomics.com/
    / cgccomics
    Hope you all enjoy the video!
    TIMESTAMPS:
    00:00 - Intro
    01:35 - JSA Partnership
    11:40 - Community Feedback
    16:17 - The 9.9 PreScreen
    24:10 - Comparative Grading
    33:09 - Grading Subjectivity
    42:52 - Grading Guide & Scale Evolution
    50:09 - Dealing With New Restoration Techniques
    58:41 - The Census
    01:05:42 - Retail Variants & Numbered Books
    01:15:38 - Lawsuit Updates
    =========================================================
    Sanity Kickstarter - www.kickstarter.com/projects/...
    =========================================================
    Check Out My Kickstart Comic "SANITY" -
    www.swagglehauscomics.com/shop
    =========================================================
    AFFILIATES
    ULTRA PRO
    5% off Promo Code: SWAGGLE
    Link: ultrapro.com/swaggle
    ultrapro.com/?rfsn=7703014.394...
    Torpedo Comics
    tinyurl.com/Swagglehaus
    10% off Promo Code - SWAGGLEHAUS
    COLLECTOR APP - bit.ly/downloadkeycollector​​​​​
    PROMO CODE - SWAGGLEHAUS - 2 Weeks Free!
    =========================================================
    Also Check Out Some of My Other Videos Below:
    KEY COMIC BOOK SPOTLIGHTS - Character Comic Book Features
    ruclips.net/p/PLD...
    MY 12 CENTS - Discussing Industry Topics
    ruclips.net/p/PLD...
    COMIC COLLECTING - Hauls & Hobby Tips
    ruclips.net/p/PLD...
    COMIC SPEC & INVESTMENT - Market Analysis and Spec Books
    ruclips.net/p/PLD...
    MARVEL TRADING CARDS
    ruclips.net/p/PLD...
    Go Collect's HOTTEST Comics Of The Week
    ruclips.net/p/PLD...
    ===========================================================
    Please drop me a like, comment or sub if you enjoyed the video :)! Also be sure to follow me on instagram - @swagglehaus_comics
    #comics #comicbooks #comiccollecting

Комментарии • 83

  • @michaelreidt4843
    @michaelreidt4843 28 дней назад +2

    Mick you need to check out Momo Ono Collects. He went to a con and meet Matt Nelson and it was not a good experience. He ask Matt about his Wonder Women #6 cgc 3.5. Matt said if you did restoration, clean, and press it should bump it up to at least 4.0 maybe 5.0. He payed for it to be restored, cleaned, and pressed it and it came back at a 3.5. When he e mail Matt said he said it was just a estimate! This is the guy who wrote a book on grading and he said it was just a estimate! Plus Momo was in con forum with cgc. Someone ask what is the average for one of your grader to grade a comic book. This is a cgc employee said 10 seconds!!!!! I hope everybody is listening. So when you pay good money to have your comic books graded it takes 10 seconds for them to grade them. One other thing they are suppose to have three grader for a book. Two regular graders and senior grader. Let say if one regular grader puts it at 6.0 and the second grader put it at 6.0. Then the senior grader puts it at 4.0. Cgc goes with the senoir grader of the 4.0 not the average. This is messed up! Go to Momo Ono Collect and watch his video,it's unbelievable!!

  • @jabezcreed
    @jabezcreed Месяц назад +7

    Great interview. Quite interesting in context of the sleuthing showing how an auction house with the right capital can amass the books and get the 9.9s.

  • @AmedeeBoulette
    @AmedeeBoulette Месяц назад +4

    This is SUCH a necessary watch!!!! It clears up soooo much stuff… thank you!

  • @trickslazer
    @trickslazer Месяц назад +12

    they main problem is that there isn't transparency or consistency in grading. look up a 8.5 and a 9.0 of the same book. the notes are empty so you dont know why they got the grade and if you crack it and re summit you'll get different grade (higher or lower). compare cgc to card grading where they break down the grading into corners,edgescolor etc. comic grading is way behind the curve.

    • @philipdispenza
      @philipdispenza Месяц назад

      Examples?

    • @a3marketing991
      @a3marketing991 Месяц назад

      It could happen, but I will say that I submitted a Silver Surfer #1 three times and it came back the same grade each time. I thought it deserved a grade bump, but I won't be submitting again.

  • @The9.9Newsstand
    @The9.9Newsstand Месяц назад +3

    Swagg, I noticed more than once that you got Matt thinking about some things that he hadn’t before. Nicely done!

  • @bachtuwork
    @bachtuwork Месяц назад +3

    Idk about the signatures from old comics being authenticated is gonna be foolproof. If the price of the signature makes money people will exploit the loophole.

  • @StarTrooper
    @StarTrooper Месяц назад +5

    I'll be sure I'm in the minority but I always felt like there weren't enough 9.9s and even 10s. Everything seemed to come back 9.8 to the point that it got ridiculous to me. Especially when it comes to modern new books right off the press.

  • @philipdispenza
    @philipdispenza Месяц назад

    Thanks for posting this, was looking forward to watching this.

  • @electrontransferconduit657
    @electrontransferconduit657 Месяц назад +6

    They need clarification on what theyre doing with sketch covers and remarks. What exactly is "negatively impact"? If it does impact it, you get a green label. If it doesnt, you get the new label. Yet, if I get it cgc witnessed, regardless if it does or doesnt impact the comic, you still get a yellow label. Does "impact" mean damage? Theyre not answering this on their forum and emailing them you may get five different answers.

    • @philipdispenza
      @philipdispenza Месяц назад +1

      Sketches unwitnessed will be qualified but the autograph will be authenticated. If the grade is low enough, usually in the mid-grade range, the sketch may drop it one step. So a 6.0 book with the sketch would go to 5.5 blue label. No point in giving it a 6.0 green.

  • @WadeNslade
    @WadeNslade Месяц назад +24

    Unless your a comic book dealer or auction house you are not getting those 9.9s

    • @AmedeeBoulette
      @AmedeeBoulette Месяц назад

      @illuminaticomics2253 agreed, same here.

    • @2hugebros241
      @2hugebros241 Месяц назад

      The game has been rigged. No joe shmo is gonna get a Iron man #1 9.9 let’s say but Mr pink sure would.. As far as CGC using JSA it’s a way they didn’t want to use before but now it makes sense? What a bunch of BS as CBCS was doing that with them for years.

    • @bachtuwork
      @bachtuwork Месяц назад +1

      Yo doggy it sounds like you barking

    • @CHAMPDOGZ
      @CHAMPDOGZ 27 дней назад

      ​@illuminaticomics2253 I got one 9.9 before actually

  • @travismoriarty669
    @travismoriarty669 29 дней назад

    Thanks for the video Swag. As a conservator I really appreciated the questions pertaining to pressing cleaning, and cover cleaning. Thanks for the time and content.

  • @brute_nm
    @brute_nm Месяц назад

    Great interview!

  • @smilsdo
    @smilsdo 26 дней назад

    I’d like to know the education and experience of the current graders. Do they participate in annual education to maintain their "certification" as graders? Are there era experts who concentrate on Silver or Bronze age only? Why so few notes? Aren't notes part of the fee paid? Answers to questions like these would provide a comfort level for submission.

  • @BigMoneyGripMCV
    @BigMoneyGripMCV 29 дней назад +1

    10 should be a ghost, zero defects. 9.9 a tiny color breaking stress line as long as everything else is perfect, 9.8 can get 2 as long as everything else is perfect. There. Done. He said it.

  • @bachtuwork
    @bachtuwork Месяц назад

    I got to get that pedigree edition Matt. In hindsight I should’ve got my CGC grading guide graded. I do believe the best thing about JSA is getting exclusive variant signatures like Spawn 350 graded. Also Matt you were CCS and now you are CGC, that’s a big change, and there has been big changes since you changed your role. So long as you are there then CGC will always be changing. That’s a good thing but I feel you have to get a grand design and not just rely on a market demand to influence changes

  • @zachbrobst9473
    @zachbrobst9473 Месяц назад +1

    Im still kind of uneasy about the impact of comparitive grading in the assignment on 9.9s/10s. Having graded many copies of a book in the past is great but having 20 copies of any given book stacked up on frobt of you with 2-3 that are clearly in better shape is going to be a difficult mental hurdle to overcome.
    Whats the justification for 9.9 prescreens to cost significantly more? Why is it so much harder to differentiate between a 9.8 and 9.9 versus a 2.0 and 2.5? It feels like cgc is still figuring out what the standards for 9.9+ are.

    • @philipdispenza
      @philipdispenza Месяц назад

      Not about costing more. The reject fee is $9. If you submit 20 books for 9.8 prescreen and get 2 rejected, you only wasted $18. If you go for the 9.9 and get 0-1, you wasted a lot more. Plus if you cracked them out, now you have 19-20 raw books you need to reholder and spend all the money for regrading. That's why he said hundreds of dollars.

  • @oacomics5956
    @oacomics5956 Месяц назад

    The bleaching part of the interview is very eye opening..

  • @davidsamuelson2089
    @davidsamuelson2089 Месяц назад +4

    He looks like his hands are cuffed behind his back in a chair - the auction houses are just off screen with their baseball bats in case he doesn’t tow the company line.

  • @user-di5ye5hr3b
    @user-di5ye5hr3b 28 дней назад

    Wait until all those 9.8s drop in price. How many more years until we get the 10 pre screen service?

    • @Mr_Rob_otto
      @Mr_Rob_otto 26 дней назад

      Why not 11? 11 is better than 10.

  • @CHAMPDOGZ
    @CHAMPDOGZ 27 дней назад

    My problem is so they weren't grading us on a 10 scale already they we're grading us on a 9.8 scale..... And why all of a sudden now you decide my prescreen 9.8's are 9.9 or 10 now but not before

  • @blackswampcomics5098
    @blackswampcomics5098 Месяц назад +6

    All I got from this video was Matt Nelson telling me to send in all my 9.8s to get regraded while winking at me. 🤨

    • @bachtuwork
      @bachtuwork Месяц назад +1

      Wankin me would be better 😅

  • @paytonardoin688
    @paytonardoin688 Месяц назад

    Yes 9.9’s and 10’s have been given before the 9.8 prescreen. But I don’t believe for a second that the recent 9.9’s and 10’s, given as a result of mass prescreen submissions, would get those same grades if they were submitted individually. Not a chance. Maybe a small fraction of them would, but without “comparative grading” they’d slap 9.8’s on most of those in a heartbeat.

  • @bachtuwork
    @bachtuwork Месяц назад

    CGC guide to grading is a helpful guide. But it already existed in Overstreet. Overstreet getting graded by CGC was either a FU or a homage to the original. Idk

  • @User8vfjhejf
    @User8vfjhejf Месяц назад

    CGC needs to graded based on what people think what a 9.9/10 should look like cause those people are the ones who can't afford 9.9/10's in the first place

  • @bachtuwork
    @bachtuwork Месяц назад

    100 labels for $100 credit… hmmm bit of a different approach. That’s a good start, keep thinking more incentives.

  • @pingadol1555
    @pingadol1555 29 дней назад +1

    I can't stand the line of we've been doing this for many many years. That does not make it right......Also, there is a feeling of self satisfaction of taking care of a book for years and get a 9.8 or what ever. Books being sent straight from the printer to CGC and getting a 9.8/9.9 etc seems cheap. The book did not earn the right to get a high grade. Pay your dues book!

  • @tough_book
    @tough_book Месяц назад +8

    I can’t watch this video…just going to be another video of Matt Nelson defending cgc and why 9.9s are a thing and no bias …
    Swagglehaus will fall right in line…not really say much or ask tough stuff…or even be real with Matt Nelson…cause he’s the guest. It’s all a money grab and subjective…how many of you have books and you wonder how it didnt get a higher grade or vice versa…the consistency of cgc is laughable. I still buy graded books…I just think CGC has gone downhill by a lot. Just my opinion.
    All influencers will be nice to Matt…and protect cgc to no end…cause well…obviously it’s part of the channel and content and they own high dollar books graded by them.
    Not hating on swags…I just know how this interview goes I don’t have to watch it lol.

    • @thecomickeeper5127
      @thecomickeeper5127 Месяц назад +2

      Yeah, it's unfortunate . RUclipsrs need to decide if they want to be more akin to journalists or fluffy influencers bc journalists would ask the tough questions

    • @tough_book
      @tough_book Месяц назад

      @@thecomickeeper5127 oh they’ll defend Matt Nelson and CGC to no end…it’s part of their channel and content and *brand*….of all the things cgc has done within the last year…and people are willing to accept….9.9s…scandals….signature verifications (we all know there will be counterfeits certified)…these channels still buy sell and pump out their content lol. Then the channels who really tell it like it is (sticky goose, thoro etc), get called haters etc…there’s really nothing Matt Nelson could tell me to convince me to what he says and CGC does isnt complete BS. It’s honestly a joke.
      Idk…these channels and influencers just defend them and stick by them. I did like cgc, but I haven’t bought many books as of late…everything CGC is doing is a complete money grab without the collector in mind…the collector should be first and foremost of anything. But hey what do I know? Lol.
      On a side note…I do believe there are 9.9s and 10s that could potentially exist…but it should be like finding a unicorn…should barely see them at all. Now they’re popping out weekly…and what do ya know…to famous auction houses and channels lol…get outta here. Just my 2 cents.

  • @davidsamuelson2089
    @davidsamuelson2089 Месяц назад

    What Ol’ Nellie doesn’t tell you is JSA will authenticate any sig as long as you lay them.

  • @danielps6328
    @danielps6328 Месяц назад

    "Gold" labels are pedigree. The sig series is "yellow"

  • @DocReasonable
    @DocReasonable Месяц назад

    The FBI estimates that roughly 50 percent of vintage sports memorabilia on the market is fraudulent. Other experts put the figure closer to 80 percent. With so much available online, it can be difficult to distinguish between an authentic signature and a bogus one.
    Chubb Insurance

  • @bachtuwork
    @bachtuwork Месяц назад

    9.9 like when it became more important to chase numbers not the actual book.
    Sis: bro you got a nice collection, too bad you ain’t got no 9.9 SIKTC #1… 🎤
    Bro: 😭🔫

  • @fuzzydunlop_1
    @fuzzydunlop_1 Месяц назад +4

    Im not even a slab guy, but thr whole 'negatively impact'/damage thing is suspect. Somehow when CGC is benefiting financially, amazingly no book is negatively impacted/damaged... and they all get the yellow label. . Funny how that works..😂

  • @leeniren3706
    @leeniren3706 Месяц назад +1

    I think it’s very significant that the CEO would come and answer questions. It shows confidence and his company. I presume he did not know the questions that he would be asked in advance. If he did then I would question how I feel.

  • @MichaelChavez-wf1yf
    @MichaelChavez-wf1yf Месяц назад +3

    Monopoly is a board game too.

    • @bachtuwork
      @bachtuwork Месяц назад

      You can’t pay CGC in Monopoly money son but you can buy it off them to put in your pocket for a rainy day. Ain’t changing 💩 still gonna be wet.

  • @gregoryliedtka7510
    @gregoryliedtka7510 Месяц назад

    This interview actually cleared up a point I didn't even know I cared about. The date the book was signed. Maybe that means something to someone. My example is my wife and I got married and 2 days later we were at NYCC and I had Frank Miller sign my death of Electra. I got it verified because the date mattered. Maybe not secondary market value but personal value.

  • @scotthunter8321
    @scotthunter8321 Месяц назад

    Subscribe, like and comment the video 👹

  • @robertdavis3567
    @robertdavis3567 Месяц назад

    Broooo what are the chances he brings up Wolverine 1 being much more common in higher grades? I gotta look up and see if Automatic Comics video game out before or after this interview.
    Any chances he knows or is in cahoots in Zazulo?

  • @junkdrunk3160
    @junkdrunk3160 Месяц назад +3

    This video is not getting many views...NUFF SAID!!!

  • @patrickmel8728
    @patrickmel8728 Месяц назад +4

    Just like with Diamond. I look forward to the day CGC has true competition so they stop doing stupid and shady shit 💩

  • @donaldhaga956
    @donaldhaga956 Месяц назад +4

    Mick I commend you for getting through a hour of this guys crap with out laughing in his face. This company is the contradiction at every turn . Thanks for the hour 20 stand up. Best laughs since Bill Burs last stand up

  • @HaroldHoyt-pj4vb
    @HaroldHoyt-pj4vb Месяц назад +11

    He is full of crap

  • @DocReasonable
    @DocReasonable Месяц назад +1

    I still don't believe it's possible to verify a signature post hoc.

  • @jeffcauthon7639
    @jeffcauthon7639 29 дней назад

    Dear CGC, please remove 9.4, 9.6 and 9.8 from your future grading scales. In the future it should be 9.0, 9.5 and 9.9. This would clear up the issue of what a perfect comic is as well as be consistent with the other grade scales. What does a 6.8 book get a CGC 7.0 or do you get a 6.5?

  • @gwedits
    @gwedits Месяц назад +3

    Wow, harsh comments out there. Personally, I have no interest in comic books past 1975, and I feel that CGC does a very accurate job of grading those books.
    Comic books with a million copies out there are NOT an investment.

  • @Mr_Rob_otto
    @Mr_Rob_otto 26 дней назад

    Q: How can you tell when Matt Nelson is lying?
    A: When his mouth moves.

  • @DanSchawbel
    @DanSchawbel Месяц назад +4

    9.9 and 10 shouldn’t be a thing, period.

    • @chi-tn
      @chi-tn Месяц назад +1

      Splitting hairs

  • @ericmeza9169
    @ericmeza9169 29 дней назад

    Destroying the books to just have 200 copies of a variant is madness.. Waste of paper imo

  • @dfilm
    @dfilm 27 дней назад

    Look at these comments... I hope everyone at ccg is paid well, they can't be in it for grateful, calm customers. 😂

  • @davidsamuelson2089
    @davidsamuelson2089 Месяц назад +1

    I sub perfect books & get 9.6 (no notes)
    Auction house subs beat up book & gets 9.9 (with notes) 🤡
    Nothing to see here - move along.

  • @wolverinearoundtheworld
    @wolverinearoundtheworld Месяц назад +2

    CGC is a joke

  • @cherryblasts9707
    @cherryblasts9707 16 дней назад

    No way will i do CGC

  • @CelestialWoodway
    @CelestialWoodway Месяц назад +2

    No shit Dick Tracy.

  • @wingxiro6277
    @wingxiro6277 Месяц назад

    Grading shouldn't be comparative. You have a list of criteria for grading and you follow it. If no 9.9 or 10's exist then they don't exist, you don't give them a pity 9.9 or 10 at that point it is truly up to the grader and the criteria doesn't mean anything. Later in interview refers to gut instinct about effects of cracked slab resubmission adversely effecting the comic market but where is that gut instinct when they all of a sudden are saying resubmit your comics so we can see if 9.8's are better than what they originally graded and flood the market with 9.9's and 10's. I am of the opinion that 9.9's and 10's aren't that rare and what created the rarity is their choice to decide whether a comic is or isn't and effect the market. It is market manipulation with great PR.

  • @nas7815
    @nas7815 Месяц назад

    First lol hahaha

  • @SondicoDenann
    @SondicoDenann 29 дней назад

    Lies and propaganda!

  • @bachtuwork
    @bachtuwork Месяц назад

    World class graders, lol.

  • @comiccollex958
    @comiccollex958 Месяц назад +1

    SWAG “Hey Matt fancy coming on the show to talk about CGC comic grading”; MATT “Hmm, not sure about this”; SWAG “Don’t worry, there won’t be any difficult questions about Auction houses getting 9.9’s, transparency and challenges about the re-holdering scandal”, MATT “sounds great buddy, could do with trying to clear some of this this heat, oh by the way don’t forget to submit those Minty Bronze Age keys in time for your next claim sale”, SWAG “sweet, see you next week”