It's running faster in the video haha 😅 I've been waiting for this, this proves wrong those who say I305 has no airtime, I KNEW that camelback pulled more than -1 g! I'm so happy 🤣
the fact that its running slower on the force graph than in the video is crazy, cant even imagine a fully warmed up version. Also glad to see that the ride lives up to the airtime I thought it had, not what everyone else says about it.
FYI this is only accurate if the accelerometer is afixed to the train, if it's just in your pocket the G's are massively damped by your body and clothing acting as suspension
Yes, if one were to acquire an Apple Watch you could hold it near the center of your chest to attain more accurate readings of what a rider would experience while riding, however I do not own an Apple Watch but the forces shouldn’t be too far off from the actual values.
@@Intamindator_305 I don't think that would be true values either as your body moving around damps forces, but the forces are still there as that's why you moved, the best you could do with a watch would probably be to keep a really tight geip of the shoulder restraint which hopefully stays still, but I have no idea I haven't been on i305 sadly
@@chrisogrady28 the damping you're describing would have very short term effects. it'd smooth out the graph, yes, but I bet it'd still show the true peak value for any element longer than 0.5sec like, once your body finishes deviating from its resting position at the start of a new element, there's no way to further damp the forces. Once you're slammed as far into your seat as you can get, the accelerometer is gonna measure the full force at play. (Not to mention the fact that if you fix the meter to your chest, whatever G's it experiences are the same G's you the rider experiences by definition. That'd arguably give more meaningful readings than affixing it to the train, but that's debatable, and as I've already argued the differences are probably pretty small) To your point, though, if it was a super bumpy ride (like an old woodie) & you wanted to measure precisely how bumpy it was, then yeah, smoothness is your enemy & affixing to the train is 100% the way to go. But if you're just trying to measure how many Gs an element pulls, chestmount damping has no major flaws
Wow you could really tell Intamin was following the 4g guideline… besides the first drop!!!😂 imagine that before they redesigned the turn after the drop, Jesus. Still hit 5gs and that’s after they ripped up that entire section and redid it
@@IamNiggler Down a hill and turns are mostly postive g's. up a hill is negative.. maybe that'll help you. at 0:16 hes pulling little under a -1G and the graph has a timer that seem sync with the video timer lol
![FØNIX last row onride with g-force data - FÅRUP SOMMERLAND[4K 60FPS]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KLMUmEBKVdU/mqdefault.jpg)
It's running faster in the video haha 😅 I've been waiting for this, this proves wrong those who say I305 has no airtime, I KNEW that camelback pulled more than -1 g! I'm so happy 🤣
That’s one of the main reasons I made this. To prove those people wrong.
@@Intamindator_305 Love it, it's my number one coaster so I was upset that I didn't have the app when I visited
I think the reason why some coaster enthusiasts think I305 has no airtime is because they’re blacked out for half the ride 😂.
Whoever says that clearly never rode I305 before or just blacked out
holy hell, he does NOT let up the entire time. cannot wait to ride this.
There’s no time to think on I305. Absolutely relentless.
check out the official POV from 14 years ago
i305 is insane today, yes, but jesus christ when it first opened it was lethal
if I were to make a coaster like that in RCT2. I would get multiple penalties. for negative G
Negative G limits are around -3G, no real coasters go anywhere near that
the fact that its running slower on the force graph than in the video is crazy, cant even imagine a fully warmed up version. Also glad to see that the ride lives up to the airtime I thought it had, not what everyone else says about it.
This is number 1 on my coaster bucket list!
I'm just here to see how much the first turn pulls.
FYI this is only accurate if the accelerometer is afixed to the train, if it's just in your pocket the G's are massively damped by your body and clothing acting as suspension
Yes, if one were to acquire an Apple Watch you could hold it near the center of your chest to attain more accurate readings of what a rider would experience while riding, however I do not own an Apple Watch but the forces shouldn’t be too far off from the actual values.
@@Intamindator_305 I don't think that would be true values either as your body moving around damps forces, but the forces are still there as that's why you moved, the best you could do with a watch would probably be to keep a really tight geip of the shoulder restraint which hopefully stays still, but I have no idea I haven't been on i305 sadly
@@chrisogrady28 the damping you're describing would have very short term effects. it'd smooth out the graph, yes, but I bet it'd still show the true peak value for any element longer than 0.5sec
like, once your body finishes deviating from its resting position at the start of a new element, there's no way to further damp the forces. Once you're slammed as far into your seat as you can get, the accelerometer is gonna measure the full force at play.
(Not to mention the fact that if you fix the meter to your chest, whatever G's it experiences are the same G's you the rider experiences by definition. That'd arguably give more meaningful readings than affixing it to the train, but that's debatable, and as I've already argued the differences are probably pretty small)
To your point, though, if it was a super bumpy ride (like an old woodie) & you wanted to measure precisely how bumpy it was, then yeah, smoothness is your enemy & affixing to the train is 100% the way to go. But if you're just trying to measure how many Gs an element pulls, chestmount damping has no major flaws
3 seconds of +4g, that’s intense as hell. Made me grey out for sure!
Imagine this during opening day before they redid the track
You should do Millennium Force! I'm especially curious about that first overbanked turn!
Nice. I’ve handled 6 just fine. This will be fine for me
Wow you could really tell Intamin was following the 4g guideline… besides the first drop!!!😂 imagine that before they redesigned the turn after the drop, Jesus. Still hit 5gs and that’s after they ripped up that entire section and redid it
yeah i'd love to see what the original readings were like
I find it funny that i never blacked out on the first turnaround, but the second considering the first one pulls more.
I think the G meter is off by a couple seconds
This is if you wanted more proof that intermediate 305 is not for the faint of heart:
"intermediate" lol. this is far from intermediate
Rip intimidator 305
So ends the life and times of Intimidator 305
@@Intamindator_305?? Is this ride getting the boot?
@loganreacts1794 No, KD is just changing the name and hopefully giving it a repaint.
@@Intamindator_305 Oh dang. Project 305 just dont hit the same way. But always happy to get a repaint!
Gotta get the flight suit for that one
thank you
You should do this with Skyrush
If I ever get out to Hershey Park I will
good idea!
from which seat were the measurements taken? looks like it was taken from the front as well by how graph is shaped on airtime hills
imagine if it was made by rcca
how did the trims not hit at all
How did you make those readings G?
Is that bump at 0:10 - 0:13 supposed to be there?
It’s supposed to sustain 4-4.5 G’s, then fall to 2. If you’re referring to the bumpiness of the graph, that’s just the roughness of the ride.
So the black line is the G-Force as it happens?
towards the end it gets a little out of sync but yes.
@@Intamindator_305you couldn't have made it more confusing. Ruins the entire video
@@IamNiggler literally you were the only one confused by this
@@James817lol they way they did it is RETARD
@@IamNiggler Down a hill and turns are mostly postive g's. up a hill is negative.. maybe that'll help you.
at 0:16 hes pulling little under a -1G and the graph has a timer that seem sync with the video timer lol
This used to pull 10 sustained g's. I completely understand stand why they changed it.😂
It did not pull 10 G’s
The most g’s on any roller coaster is around 6. And it’s not sustained at all
@@Intamindator_305 it did pull ten G's at some points, but your right, it wasn't sustained.
I can assure you that it did not pull 10 G’s
Anything above 9 is deadly
'promosm' 😞
Huh