I hate the surgeons who recommend the double open surgeries of ABDOMINAL AEROTIC ANEURYSM and BYPASS together with lots of false promises without disclosing any word of risk and without mentioning the fatal recommendation in the prescription in advance. I also hate them who disclose the risk factors only after taking money, after admission and completing most of the formalities when operation is just a few hours away leaving almost no scope to depart the hospital. I also hate the surgeons who have to do the CHOLESTOMY, TREAKESTOMY and THORACENTESIS due to their botched up multiple surgeries on a 75 yr old yet strong patient. I also hate the hospital where the patient gets blood infection and sepsis . I also hate them because they knew that the patient would die after the fatal surgeries, but kept it secret either for money or experiments . My family had committed the biggest ever blunder by trusting such dishonest doctor and the hellish corporate hospital of Bangalore
There was still a good amount of plaque left in place in the illustration. Is that left there to reduce the risk of getting too close to tthe arterial wall? I would think you would want to remove as much of that as possible and preferably all of it.
Cutting the plaque removes the fibrous cap, exposing the highly necrotic thrombotic core. What is done after the atherectomy to prevent formation of clots? Thank you
วิทยาการทางการแพทย์ของโลก..พัฒนารุดหน้าอย่างก้าวไกล..💜👍🙏
Thai?
Fantastycznie
I hate the surgeons who recommend the double open surgeries of ABDOMINAL AEROTIC ANEURYSM and BYPASS together with lots of false promises without disclosing any word of risk and without mentioning the fatal recommendation in the prescription in advance.
I also hate them who disclose the risk factors only after taking money, after admission and completing most of the formalities when operation is just a few hours away leaving almost no scope to depart the hospital.
I also hate the surgeons who have to do the CHOLESTOMY, TREAKESTOMY and THORACENTESIS due to their botched up multiple surgeries on a 75 yr old yet strong patient.
I also hate the hospital where the patient gets blood infection and sepsis .
I also hate them because they knew that the patient would die after the fatal surgeries, but kept it secret either for money or experiments .
My family had committed the biggest ever blunder by trusting such dishonest doctor and the hellish corporate hospital of Bangalore
Is this real? Is the procedure cutting the intima?, and making it weaker. Can it cause an aneurysm in the future?
There was still a good amount of plaque left in place in the illustration. Is that left there to reduce the risk of getting too close to tthe arterial wall? I would think you would want to remove as much of that as possible and preferably all of it.
yeah, they left a lot there but it might be incase something hoes wrong or there may be a needed amount of plaque build-up in some areas.
My surgeon doesnt believe in this, so now I have to find one that does. I am not crazy about stents.
what u mean he doesn't believe in this
doctors use that these days
Cutting the plaque removes the fibrous cap, exposing the highly necrotic thrombotic core. What is done after the atherectomy to prevent formation of clots? Thank you
ruclips.net/video/FqN1i_Uoi9g/видео.html
nice.. thank you
ruclips.net/video/FqN1i_Uoi9g/видео.html
Why are we not hearing much about this procedure .
I had a quadruple bypass 9 years ago and people are still having bypasses
Why ??
Yes- bypass is needed when the occlusion is at vessel bifurcation and cardiac rotor blade is not an option.
goooooooooooood
ruclips.net/video/FqN1i_Uoi9g/видео.html