Why The World Is Rushing Back To The Moon

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 дек 2024

Комментарии • 4,4 тыс.

  • @space_guy_04
    @space_guy_04 11 месяцев назад +296

    This is far better competition than firing missiles and bombs against each other

    • @richiexp2
      @richiexp2 11 месяцев назад +32

      I believe even in space, we'll be shooting missiles at each other

    • @pingshien91
      @pingshien91 11 месяцев назад +12

      They will be doing this in space soon 😂😂

    • @zeusprophet7305
      @zeusprophet7305 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@pingshien91They already had.

    • @jv-lk7bc
      @jv-lk7bc 11 месяцев назад

      Unfortunately its the same tech. Thats one reason why these races are so high profile.
      Anybody who can put a man on the moon can put an H-bomb *exactly* where they choose.

    • @rainbowoncrack8948
      @rainbowoncrack8948 10 месяцев назад +8

      @@pingshien91I’m mean to be fair that’s gonna be way cooler

  • @ejdrexmann
    @ejdrexmann 11 месяцев назад +951

    make sure they bring duct tape for the Boeing parts lol

    • @umair8641
      @umair8641 11 месяцев назад +20

      Hahahahaha 😂

    • @allyhosch1951
      @allyhosch1951 11 месяцев назад +36

      1969 landed on the moon , it is a laughing stock, ha,ha,ha......!
      21st century, US still can't send man landed on moon. It really a laughing stock..!

    • @vickyyadav5723
      @vickyyadav5723 11 месяцев назад +6

      😂🤣

    • @sadikadhaan4595
      @sadikadhaan4595 11 месяцев назад +1

      1969 landing is real. Period.

    • @dissinfo6358
      @dissinfo6358 11 месяцев назад +16

      Don't forget the aluminum foil.

  • @ianbattles7290
    @ianbattles7290 11 месяцев назад +280

    Just tell America that there is oil on the moon and they will send their army up there to "liberate" it.

    • @1.blazeIT
      @1.blazeIT 11 месяцев назад +20

      This is funny. However do remember, where would your country be at if it wasn't for all of the fantastic things America did? (Not downplaying the bad things we've done - but as a nation, we've done things that's changed the world for the better)

    • @momentary_
      @momentary_ 11 месяцев назад +11

      There kinda is oil on the moon and the U.S. has known about it for decades. There's an abundance of Helium-3 on the Moon surface, which is a high output fuel for fusion reactions. The Helium-3 on the Moon would produce more energy than all the petroleum on Earth. Even with something that valuable, the cost of shipping to Earth is prohibitive.

    • @thisisprayag4172
      @thisisprayag4172 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@momentary_ Americans will rush to the moon when they fear someone else going there and claiming resources until then that will be sleeping.

    • @Soham.69
      @Soham.69 11 месяцев назад +8

      Freedom 🦅

    • @tackle9ax327
      @tackle9ax327 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@1.blazeIT总有一群美国人,像你一样自以为是,放心这个地球少了你们只会更美好

  • @lu.160
    @lu.160 11 месяцев назад +350

    Imagine what we could achieve if we shared our resources instead of trying do it all on our own.

    • @tubecated_development
      @tubecated_development 11 месяцев назад +31

      The ISS, for instance…

    • @RS-ko9fx
      @RS-ko9fx 11 месяцев назад +62

      We'd just do nothing...
      That's why you need competition. If there's no competition, none of these countries would have any incentive to do anything.
      I cringe at woke peace activists. We are humans. Humans compete. Survival of whoever has the upper hand. That's how it always will be.

    • @tubecated_development
      @tubecated_development 11 месяцев назад +53

      @@RS-ko9fx your mind(set) is so simple and incorrect. Co-operation and competition are both human features. One without the other will lead to impoverishment and worse.

    • @ViharS
      @ViharS 11 месяцев назад +3

      because some of them want to conquer

    • @Superpooper-2020
      @Superpooper-2020 11 месяцев назад

      Maj0ritty 0f us Indians can't aff0rd 2 meals a day

  • @もかママ-k2h
    @もかママ-k2h 11 месяцев назад +299

    I would like the world to know that the budget for science and technology in Japan is very small, that it is done on a limited budget, and that failure is not tolerated.

    • @itsmeaditya102
      @itsmeaditya102 11 месяцев назад +51

      Same here in India too

    • @ProLab.
      @ProLab. 11 месяцев назад +52

      While INDIA has done it in less than half budget of Japan

    • @sigma_z
      @sigma_z 11 месяцев назад +22

      They should first ask the Supreme Leader Aladeen if they should make their rockets pointy or not. Failure is deathly not tolerated by the Supreme Leader. 😂😅

    • @pogz1
      @pogz1 11 месяцев назад +2

      this is north korea right?

    • @silentmajority8365
      @silentmajority8365 11 месяцев назад +7

      @@ProLab. and neither would have done it without our technology

  • @adjacent-smith
    @adjacent-smith 11 месяцев назад +72

    Getting my popcorn ready for the lunar war saga

    • @AC-oz9gr
      @AC-oz9gr 11 месяцев назад +4

      Literally Star Wars in our time

    • @anitalindpawar3218
      @anitalindpawar3218 11 месяцев назад +1

      Haha. I also get my popcorn😅

    • @MysticWizardOfMind
      @MysticWizardOfMind 10 месяцев назад

      It will never happen. Sorry.

    • @Native722
      @Native722 10 месяцев назад +1

      This is going to be the true WW3, battle for the moon

  • @xanden1
    @xanden1 11 месяцев назад +169

    Looks like the moon is going to be something else to fight over

    • @gamers-xh3uc
      @gamers-xh3uc 11 месяцев назад +4

      Atleast no one lives there tho

    • @aurorapaisley7453
      @aurorapaisley7453 11 месяцев назад +6

      Maybe on Earth, but then I doubt scientists on the moon would ever find it productive to be as territorial there, cooperation is most beneficial for all parties involved

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад +1

      If we really went to the moon then we would have permanent manned bases by now. Whoever establishes the first base will have control.

    • @ingGS
      @ingGS 11 месяцев назад +3

      @@derp8575What would a permanent manned base in the Moon serve? A dry rock that has been studied for millennia is not priority over other interesting celestial bodies.

    • @benzene_sandwich
      @benzene_sandwich 11 месяцев назад

      @@ingGSmassive mineral deposits

  • @KiranAlokkan
    @KiranAlokkan 11 месяцев назад +253

    Space exploration is for the benefit of all irrespective of which country explores it. Hope this brings the world together and put all enmities aside.

    • @narajuna
      @narajuna 11 месяцев назад +5

      Is this verified Truth? Put food on plates? What about Cancer Patients? Inmates?

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад +19

      We would all get along well if it wasn't for the 1% turning us against each other.

    • @user-io7sh7nx7c
      @user-io7sh7nx7c 11 месяцев назад +13

      ​@@narajuna think more in the benefit of humanity than individuality.
      Increasing cosmological knowledge is way more important than loosing a few humans here and there although making them survive also increases the efficiency of the human race.

    • @justaguy2365
      @justaguy2365 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@user-io7sh7nx7c I see no way this benefits humanity.

    • @josiahflowers6803
      @josiahflowers6803 11 месяцев назад

      Lmao

  • @gerardanderson9665
    @gerardanderson9665 11 месяцев назад +112

    "For All Mankind" here we come

    • @eannamcnamara9338
      @eannamcnamara9338 11 месяцев назад +1

      every time i watch FAM i cry knowing i don't live in their world

    • @The_ZeroLine
      @The_ZeroLine 11 месяцев назад

      @@eannamcnamara9338Get a grip.

    • @sandilemfeka4658
      @sandilemfeka4658 11 месяцев назад

      😂😂😂😂For all mankind😂😂😂😂 Are you deluded?

    • @jacobdewey2053
      @jacobdewey2053 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@eannamcnamara9338 Well everything in the show beginning with the launch of pathfinder (and probably sea dragon) is developed in a fantastical timeline so there's no point crying. The FAM universe is pretty much an impossibility after the establishment of Jamestown (though somewhat realistic to that point).

    • @eannamcnamara9338
      @eannamcnamara9338 11 месяцев назад +2

      @@jacobdewey2053 It's still a universe i want to live in though. one where we have conquered the moon, mars, fusion and climate change, instead of floundering around like idiots

  • @Astrashastra
    @Astrashastra 10 месяцев назад +68

    Chandrayan 3 strongly indicated that water just won't be on surface but under the lunar surface. Vikram(the lander) did a test on lunar surface by drilling into it and measuring the underground temperature. The result was quite interesting just a little below from surface the temperature dropped quite a lot.

    • @Pinto_Mouzer
      @Pinto_Mouzer 10 месяцев назад +7

      Because the frozen water is supposed to be trapped in the crater where sunlight barely reaches and vikram drills on the surface of the moon. Nevertheless, the findings of drastic change in temperature within the depth of 10cm was quite an accomplishment. Kudos to India.🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @iqbalbhq6884
      @iqbalbhq6884 10 месяцев назад +4

      India 😂

    • @kaycey7361
      @kaycey7361 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@iqbalbhq6884chuslim 😂

    • @akhripasta2670
      @akhripasta2670 10 месяцев назад +1

      ​@iqbalbhq6884 Iqbal🤡

    • @akhripasta2670
      @akhripasta2670 10 месяцев назад +2

      Lunar soil is very poor conductor of heat

  • @BrittanySummer-v7g
    @BrittanySummer-v7g 11 месяцев назад +14

    The moon's lack of atmosphere and low gravity benefit it becoming a nominal launch platform for future missions.

  • @existinthenow7443
    @existinthenow7443 11 месяцев назад +106

    "I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore."
    -Don Pettit (NASA astronaut)

    • @calebjenkinson7035
      @calebjenkinson7035 11 месяцев назад +43

      Added context - he meant that the tech they used at the time was now VERY outdated and decommissioned, and the government hadn’t prioritized spending the money on updating the tech since we won the space race

    • @JBSbass
      @JBSbass 11 месяцев назад +20

      @@calebjenkinson7035 how would you know what he meant to say?

    • @shannonjaensch3705
      @shannonjaensch3705 11 месяцев назад +8

      WELL SAID. Truth told in plane sight

    • @TailOfThePup
      @TailOfThePup 11 месяцев назад +8

      Not even light can go to the moon in a nanosecond

    • @IndianSummer79
      @IndianSummer79 11 месяцев назад +31

      Because we never went in the first place.

  • @jkuang
    @jkuang 11 месяцев назад +71

    It is weird that in 1960s, we can land on the moon many times, like going to the back yard of our house. And we even play golf on the moon. And we could have REAL TIME VIDEO CONFERENCES among moon landing module, moon orbit module and earth. And we could automate lift off with the life support modules from moon to 300 miles up moon orbit like it is nothing, even if 1/6 of earth gravity.
    Those days, we have only mechanical switches and limited number of vacuum tubes.
    But 60 years later, we could not even do a proper lift off from earth. And we have IC that has billions of transistors and we have progressed so much in so many technological fronts.

    • @scubastevedan
      @scubastevedan 11 месяцев назад +20

      Modern technology is in some ways more fragile. Sometimes a simple "update" can cause your phone more harm than good. Using simple 1960's electronics operated by brave men on a manned spacecraft (as opposed to an unmanned one) seems to have been a better option in some ways.

    • @onsokumaru4663
      @onsokumaru4663 11 месяцев назад +14

      Hey do you know that cars back in the days use to be more durable and last longer than current modern cars which breaks down a lot. Can you guess why old cheap tech is better than current expensive advanced tech? The answer is greed, modern companies cut corners and make inferior products for maximum profits.

    • @scubastevedan
      @scubastevedan 11 месяцев назад +4

      @@onsokumaru4663 also modern electronics have much smaller components which are far more sensitive to damage, even static electricity can damage a microchip beyond repair.

    • @SafeBandicoot
      @SafeBandicoot 11 месяцев назад +28

      We can easily repeat Apollo. The question is why and what is the immidiate return on investment.
      In the run up to the peaks of Apollo program it was consuming over 2% of US GDP. The aim was to beat the Soviets and demonstrate who has the best rockets to lob the nukes. Apollo’s brief was to throw a few men & equipment to the moon, pick-up a few rocks, do some PR and come back. A single mission was no more than 2 weeks. This is very easy to repeat if there is nothing else to spend the money on.
      Upcoming manned moon missions are very different beasts. To see even a half a chance of a worthwhile return on investment, future missions must enable humans to spend more than a month or even years beyond earth orbit. This is complete uncharted territory when it comes to engineering life sustaining machine habitats.

    • @scubastevedan
      @scubastevedan 11 месяцев назад +5

      @@SafeBandicoot well said Bandicoot, well said.

  • @DNANDROID
    @DNANDROID 11 месяцев назад +147

    It's simple. Moon to Mars exponentially easier than Earth to Mars. The shuttle can be fundamentally different. It just needs to be assembled there.

    • @tonywilson4713
      @tonywilson4713 11 месяцев назад +36

      I'm an aerospace engineer and you are right.
      Unfortunately when it comes to engineering being right means nothing.
      Who's paying and what they want is everything.

    • @ziomeknb
      @ziomeknb 11 месяцев назад

      it's simple, they are getting paid to lie to their people. no one ever landed on the moon.

    • @jedi4049
      @jedi4049 11 месяцев назад

      how do you do it in that environment? Gravity well easier yes. But you gotta build bases, launch pads, avoid dust. Sounds like a better plan if it works. @@tonywilson4713

    • @TheMattsem
      @TheMattsem 11 месяцев назад

      Easier yeah if you ignore a solar radiation low gravity that destroy bones and muscles oh yeah and the ridiculous temperatures

    • @mathewshoyt1763
      @mathewshoyt1763 11 месяцев назад +1

      you are correct... plus the moon can be used as a military base for ICBM launches.

  • @もかママ-k2h
    @もかママ-k2h 11 месяцев назад +42

    SLIM, congratulations on landing on the moon!
    Thank you, JAXA!

    • @Chickenworm9394
      @Chickenworm9394 11 месяцев назад +5

      What's so happy with an non-operational rover?

    • @wxter1574
      @wxter1574 11 месяцев назад +7

      ​@@Chickenworm9394it's to appreciate the work done to make it reach its destination, failure is inevitable in space

    • @rowshambow
      @rowshambow 11 месяцев назад

      It still landed successfully ​@@Chickenworm9394

  • @amosbatto3051
    @amosbatto3051 11 месяцев назад +26

    It mostly comes down to who can develop the rockets to take a lot of payload to the moon to set up a colony, because it requires huge amounts of equipment to keep a colony running. Once SpaceX has the Super Heavy + Starship running, the US is going to have a huge lead over other countries in terms of the cost per kg of transporting to the Moon. Methane and oxygen can be made from lunar soil and water, so the Starship can be fueled from the moon. I simply don't see hydrogen rockets as viable because it is questionable whether they can be made reusable, since hydrogen embrittles the metal and it is so hard to store hydrogen for long periods of time.
    The speculation about taking helium-3 from the moon to power the Earth strikes me as a ludicrous idea. We already have wind and solar plus grid batteries which are cheap and scalable and have falling cost curves. Once you calculate the cost of developing helium-3 fusion reactors and transporting helium-3 from the moon to the Earth, there is no way that helium-3 energy is going to be cost competitive with renewable energy in the 2030s. Even on the moon, I doubt that helium-3 energy is going to be able to compete with solar panels + LFP grid batteries. Perovskite-silicon tandem solar cells are going to take the efficiency over 30% at commodity prices, so I don't see why any other type of energy will be used.

    • @tiffanycole4911
      @tiffanycole4911 11 месяцев назад +1

      Sitting wondering if I should even bother looking into what kinda resources are on the moon that are worth going to try to retrieve

    • @jv-lk7bc
      @jv-lk7bc 11 месяцев назад +4

      You're kind of refuting yourself there, amosbatto. 200 years ago, internal combustion engines were a ludicrous idea. 30 years ago, solar was a ludicrous idea. renewables have only become economically viable in the last decade or so.
      We're 1 or 1.5 decades from viable helium-3? Well, thats a similar time scale to what it'll take (assuming consistent funding) to establish solid lunar bases that are safe and reliable enough to support any kind of industry anyway, so that lines up pretty well.
      It takes 4 years to design and produce a car w/established tech. As any VC entreprenour can tell you, you can't set up a new industry by thinking in terms of next year's bottom line.
      Wind and solar are now great short to mid-term investments, and they will mature but they will never match the energy efficiency we had w/ internal combustion. To prepare for the next economic steps of the latter 21st century we'll need something with more oomph.
      The best candidate is clean fusion. We've made it work in the lab, now it needs to be scaled and industrialized.

    • @gracialonignasiver6302
      @gracialonignasiver6302 8 месяцев назад

      Fast forward to April 2024 and Starship can barely get itself to orbit with zero payload. Now Elon is talking about extending the length of Starship...
      People dislike the guy, but I trust Bezos and Blue Origin in the long run more than I trust Musk and Spacex.

  • @bhawanisinghindia2287
    @bhawanisinghindia2287 11 месяцев назад +30

    Amazing work 👽👽👽

    • @chimagamer4157
      @chimagamer4157 11 месяцев назад +2

      wait till they realize they are already on mars, but shh you didn't hear it from here.

  • @timothysands5537
    @timothysands5537 11 месяцев назад +113

    That was some really smooth animation of the various moon missions. The soft landing animation was outstanding 👏

    • @nesune4401
      @nesune4401 11 месяцев назад +2

      I can do better

    • @richardjakobek7477
      @richardjakobek7477 11 месяцев назад +16

      yes, but the animation at 0.23 showing the Earth appearing from behind the moon has North America back to front. With Florida in the west and California in the east.

    • @anitalindpawar3218
      @anitalindpawar3218 11 месяцев назад +4

      😆👍🏼yeah. Soooo soft landing in the studio👏🏼😆

    • @marialourainebanosia26
      @marialourainebanosia26 11 месяцев назад

      I really hate people like you who dont believe the moon landing

    • @michaelsburger665
      @michaelsburger665 11 месяцев назад +4

      and no dust was displaced how great to do that, can only be done in Hollywood

  • @felipeescobar5145
    @felipeescobar5145 11 месяцев назад +96

    Great video.
    Please, cotinue doing reports and investigations like this.

    • @butterfacemcgillicutty
      @butterfacemcgillicutty 11 месяцев назад +2

      But but but Trump said/did something stupid! Need I say Kim Kardashian? And look, Kanye West!

    • @gamesthatiplay9083
      @gamesthatiplay9083 11 месяцев назад +1

      Great video, but no new video from the moon in this video?

    • @tankueytryn
      @tankueytryn 11 месяцев назад

      Investigation? LMAO, It's all property of the AP!

  • @Z71990
    @Z71990 4 месяца назад +2

    5:40 Lol, u are saying that after the discovery of Water , India was interested.
    It's INDIA, who 1st discovered Water

  • @4-SeasonNature
    @4-SeasonNature 11 месяцев назад +54

    China didn't lose access to the international space station. China never had access to start with.

    • @yuugenr7549
      @yuugenr7549 11 месяцев назад +11

      So china made their own better version

    • @4-SeasonNature
      @4-SeasonNature 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@yuugenr7549 It had to go alone.

    • @Chilicoach
      @Chilicoach 11 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@yuugenr7549Better? 😅

    • @MhCho-u4o
      @MhCho-u4o 11 месяцев назад

      Yes better no doubt.

    • @Chilicoach
      @Chilicoach 11 месяцев назад +1

      @user-th2tq1ro3m right, just like the J-31 is the "better" version of the F-35 right? 😂

  • @druu988
    @druu988 11 месяцев назад +28

    Getting back to the moon in 2025 shouldn’t be that difficult. It should be easy if anything seeing that we did it back in 1969. We were far limited in technology back then.

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад +3

      Artemis was recently delayed. The excuse we were given was "safety concerns". LOL!

    • @TheJjcczz
      @TheJjcczz 11 месяцев назад +16

      @@derp8575you want to go up in faulty rocket be my guest, you can also cover the billions of dollars of wasted investment when the whole thing goes up in flames because dust shorted out one of the tiny computer chips that are more fragile than the technology used in 69

    • @jn5433
      @jn5433 11 месяцев назад +5

      Yes but it’s not all about that, these aren’t missions to put a man on the moon again pick up a couple of space rocks and come back.

    • @freakazoid4691
      @freakazoid4691 11 месяцев назад +7

      Look into the different moon missions. They were very risky. Lots of unmanned missions failed, especially in the beginning. Once the success rate improved manned missions began and eventually it was deemed safe enough to try a landing. “Safe enough” back then is not the same as now though.

    • @apbt067
      @apbt067 11 месяцев назад +4

      If they really went back then.

  • @Chickenworm9394
    @Chickenworm9394 11 месяцев назад +46

    Why? Because China says it is going send Taikonauts to the moon by 2030, and every nation in the world knows China is going to make it

    • @silentmajority8365
      @silentmajority8365 11 месяцев назад +11

      Covid on the moon

    • @alanOHALAN
      @alanOHALAN 11 месяцев назад

      covid originated from the US@@silentmajority8365

    • @mitchconner403
      @mitchconner403 11 месяцев назад

      Cut to footage of Chinese rocket landing in the middle of a village killing thousands
      It actually happened look it up

    • @OOsirishotep
      @OOsirishotep 11 месяцев назад +15

      @@silentmajority8365
      better than Epstein Palace on the moon

    • @ChatGoPT
      @ChatGoPT 11 месяцев назад

      @@OOsirishotep You know guys like that. Most of the leaders were WIP

  • @Robert_Douglass
    @Robert_Douglass 11 месяцев назад +4

    What would be the projected cost for harnessing helium-3 to completely power the entire Earth for a year, a decade, fifty years, and so on?

  • @jeremytessier5316
    @jeremytessier5316 11 месяцев назад +30

    Imagination: With access to near unlimited resources and scientific advancements thanks to space exploration, the earth will enter a new age free of greed and suffering.
    Reality: The organizations that successfully manage to harvest the boundless resources beyond earth will use their position to advance themselves and make their leaders the richest people the world has ever seen while the 99.999% still struggle under a new monopoly.

    • @nickolasbrown3342
      @nickolasbrown3342 11 месяцев назад

      The LYNC Corporation is hiring soon!

    • @a.e_man78789
      @a.e_man78789 11 месяцев назад +1

      An inevitable reality...

    • @apbt067
      @apbt067 11 месяцев назад

      Been going on apart for a long time.

    • @jv-lk7bc
      @jv-lk7bc 11 месяцев назад

      robber barons gotta robber baron ...

  • @georgeeagle872
    @georgeeagle872 11 месяцев назад +46

    We landed on the moon decades ago. We're now trying to work out how we did it😂

    • @TheScimitar2
      @TheScimitar2 11 месяцев назад +13

      Its not as ludicrous as you think. In the 5th Century BC, the Greeks of Sicily, of example, minted coins which were such high standard of art and aesthetics that it would not be replicated again until the 17th century. It is one of many examples of cyclic nature of Human knowledge in the span of time. We try, fail, learn, forget, and repeat.

    • @r3dpowel796
      @r3dpowel796 11 месяцев назад

      50 years ago. to be exact.

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад

      It's called esoteric knowledge. There were likely people who knew how to mint those coins again, but they sat on the knowledge and passed it down to their children, hiding it from the commoners. @@TheScimitar2

    • @Native722
      @Native722 10 месяцев назад +6

      Yup pretty much, seems suspcious.

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 10 месяцев назад

      It's called esoteric knowledge. Same with ancient pyramids. The knowledge wasn't lost. It was concealed by those who want us living in ignorance. @@TheScimitar2

  • @otool
    @otool 11 месяцев назад +14

    Mark my world Artemis will keep getting delayed until they get their cgi down.

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад

      Or until they are able to successfully depopulate the masses and enslave the remainder. They won't have to fake a moon landing again.

    • @jv-lk7bc
      @jv-lk7bc 11 месяцев назад

      dude the CGI is ready to go. You havent seen the deepfakes?

  • @starexplorers1202
    @starexplorers1202 3 месяца назад +1

    It took over 50 years to figure out we should at least go back to the Moon. We need to do better than that.

  • @Kai-ic4mp
    @Kai-ic4mp 11 месяцев назад +6

    Hollywood at its best!

  • @MrWtf-pf8rb
    @MrWtf-pf8rb 11 месяцев назад +13

    I’m not understanding if our first moon landing was successful back then, why is it so hard now? Especially with advanced technology.

    • @Bnio
      @Bnio 11 месяцев назад +4

      The tech that got to the moon was hyper-focused on getting to the moon. Then the funding stopped. That proven old tech would now have to be built up again, or we work on new tech. The current space tech is excellent for other space missions -- probes, telescopes, orbiting stations -- but long-term moon missions require a whole fresh branch of related tech. You don't just dust off an old Saturn V, stuff it full of iPads, and off you go.

    • @Gilvids
      @Gilvids 11 месяцев назад +13

      Its fake

    • @Gilvids
      @Gilvids 11 месяцев назад

      ​​@@Bniooh bullsht, you also dont destroy the technology that sent people to the moon for the reason that in the future people would wanna go back there.
      The reason they use "we destroyed the technology" excuse is because its eaiser to explain it than having to prove they can go there again. Delusional boi.

    • @rainman6090
      @rainman6090 11 месяцев назад

      The budget to go to the moon was huge. At it's height, the moon program was spending 20% of the USA's GDP. It's significantly lower now and the tech is so different that they can't even use any of the tech from the Saturn V. Everything has to be designed from scratch.

    • @tldmbruno
      @tldmbruno 11 месяцев назад +2

      Its fake²

  • @Baleur
    @Baleur 11 месяцев назад +23

    What people gotta realize is, you dont NEED to be able to get from Earth surface to Mars or beyond.
    It's incredibly pointless and wasteful and difficult.
    All you need, is a refueling base (and manufacturing facility, which can largely be automated) on the Moon.
    Once you can refuel on the Moon (or in low Lunar orbit, like at Gateway station), you can literally go ANYWHERE in the solar system.
    "Easily."
    All you need is to be able to get to the Moon, from Earth surface. Then everything else is unlocked with the same craft.
    It's actually apalling and insane that we "forgot" how to get to the Moon, after we did it in the 60's.
    We could literally have already gone to Mars before the 2000's
    It's prime evidence that civilization is NOT a direct upward trajectory, parts of knowledge and tech CAN fall behind.

    • @gamesthatiplay9083
      @gamesthatiplay9083 11 месяцев назад +4

      I had always heard when funding ran out for these moon missions, it was because there was nothing on the moon. It was all rock, equivalent to what was on Earth. Modern tests of moon rock even proved that.

    • @mikemccormick6128
      @mikemccormick6128 11 месяцев назад +1

      I partly agree with you. "You don't NEED to be able to get from Earth surface to Mars or beyond." I agree with that part, but you also don't NEED to get to Mars from lunar orbit, either. It would be just as easy to get to Mars from Earth orbit. You would just need to launch your spaceship to Earth orbit, and then send up refueling tankers to refill the spaceship fuel tank. Then, getting to Mars will only take 3 to 5 months with a full tank of fuel.

    • @theriverschool822
      @theriverschool822 11 месяцев назад +1

      Yeah, also when you are on the moon, the Earth is locked in the sky in the same spot all the time. It's way more reflective than the moon, and way larger in the sky. A "full Earth" would be 50x brighter than a full moon on Earth. When the astronauts were on the moon, it would have been a half full "crescent Earth" in the sky. But they all forgot to look up with the camera! This was at sunrise on the moon, but you can still see the moon during the day on Earth, so the Earth should have been easy to see from the surface of the moon. It's like that "Don't look up movie"

    • @gamesthatiplay9083
      @gamesthatiplay9083 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@theriverschool822 This is true. The same side of the moon always faces the Earth. If I recall, that's because the moon's face itself is more mass up than the dark side.

    • @theriverschool822
      @theriverschool822 11 месяцев назад +1

      yes, and we only landed humans on the "light side" of the moon, so the Earth was always above them in the sky. Since we went to the moon during sunrise on the moon, we can conclude the Earth is located at roughly a 90* angle from the Sun. So the Earth should be half-lit by the sun and half dark from the perspective of men on the moon. A giant crescent Earth looming over you would be so amazing, never moving in the sky, no clouds or atmosphere to block it. You could build a moon base with a window that constantly looked at Earth as it shifted through daylight phases, but didn't move (much at least.) You know, Richard Nixon was the only president in office when humans have been on the moon. The same year of the Richard Nixon scandal, right after his re-election, the moon got really boring. Just a bunch of rock I guess. No other presidents wanted to keep it up after Nixon. We had five human landings on the moon in that short time though, but not one person thought to look up. I guess I've never worn a bulky space suit though. @@gamesthatiplay9083

  • @4.0gpa44
    @4.0gpa44 11 месяцев назад +27

    I'm not convinced we ever had humans on the moon.

    • @Unknown-oh6ue
      @Unknown-oh6ue 11 месяцев назад +3

      Why is that?

    • @northuniverse
      @northuniverse 11 месяцев назад +2

      They left reflectors on the surface used for Lunar Laser Ranging.

    • @Ubah00
      @Ubah00 11 месяцев назад

      @@Unknown-oh6uethey will tell you probably because of conspiracy theory that have no proof of

    • @connyjohnson855
      @connyjohnson855 11 месяцев назад +1

      Jeeez... 🙄

    • @jv-lk7bc
      @jv-lk7bc 11 месяцев назад +2

      Some fairly serious scholarship has found it would be about as technically difficult and more expensive (plus a lot of dead bodies to explain) to convincingly fake a lunar landing than to just land there.
      Have you ever seen the movie Capricorn One? (featuring OJ Simpson at his finest!)
      How long did Jack Ruby live?
      No possible way would all those tens of thousands of workers have been able to keep that scale of a secret on that time scale if left alive. Sooner or later, somebody would go Deep Throat, write an anonymous book and retire to Tahiti, spill the T to a lover, find grandpa's journal in the attic, rent the room next to Ed Snowden's in Moscow...
      Thoeries that ignore human nature aren't worth a bean.

  • @Brianhahahaha
    @Brianhahahaha 11 месяцев назад +4

    This video just proves to me that we never landed on the moon... your telling me that 50yrs later with all our technology we are struggling to land on the moon but they did it before computers were really useful tools.

    • @gamesthatiplay9083
      @gamesthatiplay9083 11 месяцев назад

      Yep that's what I gather out of this video too. I still believe the research I've done about the original landings. I've even done the math now. 240,000 miles to the moon / 14 days / 24 hours per day = 715 mph. Or traveling the speed of sound for 14 days.
      Bigger question is with all these moon landings, why is there no footage from the moon's surface? Why is it all CGI?

    • @willoughbykrenzteinburg
      @willoughbykrenzteinburg 11 месяцев назад

      We're not struggling to land on the moon. It's not like we are trying and failing? Nobody has TRIED to put humans on the moon since Apollo. It's still going to be a matter of testing. The next time we put humans on the moon, it will be with an ENTIRELY new technological structure - and it will still need to be tested. They've already started that process with the Artemis program - the next program with goals of landing men on the moon again. Artemis I has already flown. Artemis II plans to send humans around the moon. Artemis III plans to land humans on the moon again. It's a process. The people who put men on the moon during Apollo aren't in the business anymore, and if they were - they'd likely be so far out of the loop technology-wise that they would be little help. We aren't building a 1970s spacecraft. We are building a 2020s spacecraft. There is a difference, and it still requires testing and time. But to say we are "struggling" to land on the moon is just an absurd fallacy.
      Also - computers were EXTREMELY useful tools during the Apollo lunar landings. They could not have done it without them. That's just patent nonsense.

    • @Ruda-n4h
      @Ruda-n4h 10 месяцев назад +1

      Rocket technology has not progressed much at all and although modern computers are far more sophisticated, they are far more vulnerable to particle radiation than those that used low density integrated circuits and magnetic core memory, both of which are extremely radiation hard, so a new solution has to be found to a different problem. There is also no cold war imperative and no time limit placed on it by a president. We also live in much more risk averse times. All these issues are what has caused it to take so long this time around.

    • @dannyguzman5232
      @dannyguzman5232 10 месяцев назад

      Smart man

    • @willoughbykrenzteinburg
      @willoughbykrenzteinburg 10 месяцев назад

      We haven't attempted to land on the moon. If you climbed Mt Everest 50 years ago and have made no attempt to climb it again since, would it be fair for me to say, "you're struggling to climb Mt everest, therefore I don't believe you did it"?
      No.
      Also, it's "you're"; not "your".
      Ever time. You people are idiots.

  • @allyhosch1951
    @allyhosch1951 11 месяцев назад +9

    1969 landed on Hollywood studio moon landing, ha,ha,ha...!
    Until today US still can't sent man landed on moon. Definitely it is a laughing stock..!

    • @Ethan_Roberts
      @Ethan_Roberts 11 месяцев назад +1

      Proof or can you only make blind claims?

    • @Aurora666_yt
      @Aurora666_yt 11 месяцев назад

      Drivel

    • @MysticWizardOfMind
      @MysticWizardOfMind 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@Ethan_RobertsYou're so asleep, you are defending your dream and not reality. This whole thing is a fraud. Always has been. You don't wanna see that because it will shatter your dreams and your world. So you are on every comment thread arguing and commenting to people who personally don't believe in the lie, as if you get wages to do so.

  • @doitallste
    @doitallste 11 месяцев назад +6

    not on the moon yet and we're already talking about "who will conquer the moon first"...

    • @asdfoifhvjbkaos
      @asdfoifhvjbkaos 9 месяцев назад

      well the answer is whoever gets there first

  • @cjbht19minaret
    @cjbht19minaret 11 месяцев назад +5

    5:55 You can't be serious... Have you seen the video of India's "moon landing"? It looks like a galaga ship from a video game lol. Notice how the motion is completely unrealistic and no dust is even kicked up when landing. Keep in mind that the moon has extremely low gravity so dust would be kicked up easily! Also... what were they filming with??

    • @stevens6196
      @stevens6196 11 месяцев назад +1

      They have done with CGI landing and far away from south pole 600 km!

    • @littlegamer00
      @littlegamer00 11 месяцев назад

      The engine was very low power.

    • @Nuke.n
      @Nuke.n 10 месяцев назад

      Keep coping

    • @MysticWizardOfMind
      @MysticWizardOfMind 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@Nuke.nSpeak for yourself and stop projecting your own insecurities.

    • @Nuke.n
      @Nuke.n 10 месяцев назад

      @@MysticWizardOfMind 🤣 where are your facts

  • @JamesJacobson-ov4ps
    @JamesJacobson-ov4ps 11 месяцев назад +28

    That lander looks like a middle school arts and crafts project😆. You’re not going anywhere in the
    At thing

    • @mrbigbankuchiface_3352
      @mrbigbankuchiface_3352 10 месяцев назад +1

      the space people get so triggered when you tell them the moon landing was fake 🤓😡

    • @michelmilaneh8963
      @michelmilaneh8963 10 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@mrbigbankuchiface_3352we get triggered by morons in 2024 when knowledge is easily accessible

    • @michelmilaneh8963
      @michelmilaneh8963 10 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@mrbigbankuchiface_3352we get triggered by morons in 2024 when knowledge is easily accessible

  • @Rickard...
    @Rickard... 11 месяцев назад +4

    Over 50 years later......
    I'm surprised they haven't already got base's on the moon....
    (Or are they on Mars?)

  • @nzoomed
    @nzoomed 11 месяцев назад

    1:18 who drew the earth so big in that graphic?

  • @dragoonseye76
    @dragoonseye76 11 месяцев назад +15

    Must be trying to get there for real this time.

    • @TonalBeef
      @TonalBeef 7 месяцев назад

      The moon landings are in fact real, it is an insurmountable truth. There is so much evidence in the form of photography, video and demonstrable experiments that it is impossible to disprove.

  • @CadyCadwell
    @CadyCadwell 11 месяцев назад +6

    50 years of technological advancement and still no human on moon and people still ponder the legitimacy of nasa moon landing...

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад

      NASA fanboys would make excellent parrots. They believe everything they are told by governments and corporations.

  • @icemike1
    @icemike1 11 месяцев назад +32

    😂 this dude talking about china claiming land that's doesn't belong to them 😂😂

    • @gobyhsu
      @gobyhsu 11 месяцев назад +4

      傲慢与偏见

    • @sigma_z
      @sigma_z 11 месяцев назад +2

      There's a guy from the USA who's selling land on the moon already. You get a certified deed and everything. 😂😅

    • @silentmajority8365
      @silentmajority8365 11 месяцев назад +8

      Ho Lee Chit

    • @semiramisubw4864
      @semiramisubw4864 11 месяцев назад

      Meanwhile the US claimed the whole universe to them some decades ago..

    • @erwinreinerbulahao6121
      @erwinreinerbulahao6121 11 месяцев назад +2

      Islands near to the Philippines is waving😒

  • @ScooterinAB
    @ScooterinAB 11 месяцев назад +2

    I find it adorable that the US is in a space race with China and is acting like it's the rest place on earth. Everyone is quick to condemn China for this or that while happily ignoring what their own countries are doing.

    • @guojunma9802
      @guojunma9802 7 месяцев назад

      I don't find it "adorable", just disgusting

  • @LinguisticSugar
    @LinguisticSugar 11 месяцев назад +4

    Back?

    • @thomashiggins9320
      @thomashiggins9320 11 месяцев назад

      Yes.
      Fool.🙄

    • @LinguisticSugar
      @LinguisticSugar 11 месяцев назад

      How did humans make it through the van allen belt? @@thomashiggins9320

  • @Popwarner-x1w
    @Popwarner-x1w 11 месяцев назад +4

    Bring extra curtain rods to replace the curtain rods on the old moon ship 😊

  • @bluesteel1
    @bluesteel1 11 месяцев назад +4

    > Solving negative effects of micro gravity on the human body
    > Preventing radiation from harming astronauts.
    > Space mining ( To prevent launching everything from earth)
    > Space manufaturing (Use the mined resources to create complex products)
    > Cheap launch infrastructure
    Once the above 5 points are solved. Space exploration will boom like never before and we will TRULY transistion into the space age. Only the 5th once is close to being solved by Starship.

    • @somethingelse9228
      @somethingelse9228 11 месяцев назад +2

      "Only the 5th once is close to being solved by Starship" Even that is highly debatable

    • @museonfilm8919
      @museonfilm8919 11 месяцев назад +1

      The biggest hurdle is Humans.
      While we are so busy fighting one another for resources, we will take our eyes off the prize, and then it may be too late.

  • @bigbrothertiger4370
    @bigbrothertiger4370 11 месяцев назад +2

    very excited to see high definition video streaming from the moon when one of the landers successfully land on the moon

  • @johnespicer2560
    @johnespicer2560 11 месяцев назад +6

    4:52 “Water can be used to make rocket fuel”
    If they can do it on the moon, why haven’t they done it on Earth?

    • @Shashankvc-eu5bf
      @Shashankvc-eu5bf 11 месяцев назад +2

      Every rocket fired from earth has a liquid h2 and liquid O2 stage genuis

    • @Cafaura
      @Cafaura 11 месяцев назад

      They have.
      They used it for the upper stage or the Saturn 5
      The advantage of doing it on the moon is they don’t need to carry the fuel out of the massive gravity well which is earths gravity.
      Easier to launch the fuel off a 1/6 G than a full 1 g

  • @deansharif5068
    @deansharif5068 11 месяцев назад +6

    How do they keep a straight face 🤣

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад

      When most people are willing to believe the lie, it's easy. One thing I noticed about NASA fans is that they watch a lot of tell-a-vision. Combine that with fluoridated water and vaccines and you have the perfect slaves. They willingly place their mind's into shackles.

  • @hondaxyz
    @hondaxyz 11 месяцев назад +12

    We would have never known about water on the moon if it were USA or China mission.

    • @KP-xi4bj
      @KP-xi4bj 11 месяцев назад +1

      Not true. The early NASA missions weren't focused on searching out water. Ever heard of the space race between USA and USSR?

    • @onlyforytb
      @onlyforytb 11 месяцев назад +6

      @@KP-xi4bj I think their point was that it would have been kept a secret

    • @napobg6842
      @napobg6842 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@onlyforytb What secret? There is evidence for water on the Moon since the Apollo days

  • @highrzr
    @highrzr 11 месяцев назад +2

    I'm not sure if Boeing should be part of this. They've had a lot of parts falling off their aircraft lately.

  •  11 месяцев назад +20

    Return to the moon? I'm not sure we ever went there in the first place.

    • @tonynoaa3950
      @tonynoaa3950 11 месяцев назад +4

      We didn't lol

    • @jv-lk7bc
      @jv-lk7bc 11 месяцев назад

      I'm not sure you exist.

    • @joeiannuzzi6729
      @joeiannuzzi6729 11 месяцев назад

      Do your research. The Apollo missions have been well documented. All those conspiracy theories are a load of nonsense.

    • @Ruda-n4h
      @Ruda-n4h 10 месяцев назад

      Definitely.

    • @KuostA
      @KuostA 10 месяцев назад

      way to out yourself as a smooth brain pleb single digit IQ NPC lmao

  • @tackle9ax327
    @tackle9ax327 11 месяцев назад +6

    1969年“登月”,现在连火箭都上不去,说资料丢了😂😂😂

  • @friendlyone2706
    @friendlyone2706 11 месяцев назад +14

    Two weeks of lunar night without sunlight or Earth noise -- an opportunity for important work -- important for knowledge gained and human survival.
    The far side of the moon is the only logical place to have a radio astronomy base, and one of the best places to watch for possible incoming asteroids. We still have large asteroid come close to earth that are not seen until PASSING Earth.

  • @PLACESNONDESCRIPT
    @PLACESNONDESCRIPT Месяц назад +2

    USA fears china will show no lunar landing 😂

  • @theelephantintheroom69
    @theelephantintheroom69 11 месяцев назад +4

    I wouldn't call it rushing with NASA's snail pace progress to create the SLS rocket

    • @willoughbykrenzteinburg
      @willoughbykrenzteinburg 11 месяцев назад +1

      It's not NASA's fault. They rely on federal funding. In 1970s money, NASA's funding is tiny compared to what it was during the Apollo era. All these things cost money.

    • @theelephantintheroom69
      @theelephantintheroom69 11 месяцев назад

      @@willoughbykrenzteinburg They are spending multiple times the amount of money SpaceX is on their next generation rocket which is an entirely new design as opposed to SLS literally recycling 80s and 90s rocket parts on a rocket which only has reusability on the SRBs. They need costly refurbishment after each flight after landing in the salty ocean water among other reasons. Had they just gone with a new rocket design which could land itself like Starship or in part like Falcon 9 then the costs would be millions per launch not billions. They could do more with that "70s money" you talk about but I can agree the funding is very low. Then again, I wouldn't want to be funding a program recycling parts for a rocket that costs billions per launch throwing away a third of the rocket. Also, if it was too risky or dangerous to use a rocket that can land itself then why let SpaceX launch astronauts to the ISS on Falcon 9 for them? They're also even contracting SpaceX to make a lunar lander variant of Starship for the very same astronauts that fly in SLS to the moon, so they clearly do think it is safe.
      The cause behind SLS's slow pace is because of the bureaucratic design of NASA and the fact that they don't think they can back out of their design now.

  • @Kahlon33
    @Kahlon33 11 месяцев назад +13

    I wonder how far human race can go if these all countries decided to work together

    • @ejokurirulezz
      @ejokurirulezz 11 месяцев назад +3

      Nowhere, they'd argue about who's right and who's wrong. Meanwhile, while they're on a race, they're actually doing their best. Human is not social mammal. It's competitive mammal. We don't live in a society, that's bs to control you. We live in a constant competition of survival of the fittest.

    • @ninja.saywhat
      @ninja.saywhat 11 месяцев назад

      If the US and the USSR have been collaborating for space exploration alongside other major countries since post WW2 and Cold War didn't exist, we most likely would have not only colonized the Moon by now, but Mars also. Instead what we got today is another "race" to the Moon.

  • @kotomoidealmcky
    @kotomoidealmcky 11 месяцев назад +34

    u can land a man few decades ago and u can't do it now with tons of new technologies? 😂

    • @freakazoid4691
      @freakazoid4691 11 месяцев назад +7

      If you read up on this it’s just simple logic. The knowledge and tech exists but the actual rockets and manufacturing plants are no more. Simply a matter of costs.

    • @mahalallel2012
      @mahalallel2012 11 месяцев назад +9

      @@freakazoid4691 If you believe that, then the Lochness Monster, Big Foot and King Kong are real??

    • @Qwerty.240
      @Qwerty.240 11 месяцев назад +4

      ​@@mahalallel2012 after the cold war, there seemed to be no reason to carry out such expensive expeditions and there were budgetary limitations. Sending a human to outer space is way more expensive and riskier than just sending a probe. Newer tech can make it more affordable and for a longer time to actually carry out sufficient research in outer space.

    • @mahalallel2012
      @mahalallel2012 11 месяцев назад

      You sound like you are trying to convince yourself@@Qwerty.240

    • @stevemoore73
      @stevemoore73 11 месяцев назад

      @tatata832 only reason theyre going now is money to be made

  • @Bells-yf2op
    @Bells-yf2op 11 месяцев назад

    Is there any pictures of videos of these countries landing on the moon?

    • @TonalBeef
      @TonalBeef 7 месяцев назад

      Chang’e 6 and 5 has taken images and landed on the moon by the chinese and are still operating
      SLIM has taken pictures by Japan
      Odysseus took a really low quality picture because of it’s landing condition by the USA
      Chang’e 4 and 3 have taken pictures by china again and are still operating
      Chang’e 2 was a orbiter so it didn’t land on the moon but it did take high resolution images of the whole surface of the moon.
      So to answer your question. Yes. There are pictures from all the landers that went to the moon. All it takes is a simple search

  • @kylel4799
    @kylel4799 11 месяцев назад +6

    It's only been 20,097 days, 15 hours, 21 minutes and 0 seconds, or 55 years, 9 days, 15 hours, 21 minutes. Technology hasn't advanced that much since then, right? Why such a rush?
    Why do we use the phrases like "Getting to the moon", as opposed to "returning the moon"?
    When do our leaders become honest people with the public?

  • @TheMadmax0609
    @TheMadmax0609 11 месяцев назад +21

    How was it so easy in the 60's-70's and now it's an ordeal?

    • @r3dpowel796
      @r3dpowel796 11 месяцев назад +2

      I know right they make it sound like its humanity 1st time landing on moons but if we all watch the videos in the 60s it looks too easy.

    • @monkeeseemonkeedoo3745
      @monkeeseemonkeedoo3745 11 месяцев назад +3

      It was hard then too though. But also, the people who did that are not able to work anymore, much of that experience was lost

    • @MaskhenzoG
      @MaskhenzoG 11 месяцев назад +7

      ​@@ChrisRobin-zg1yr or it was faked theory is true

    • @mariajiao4855
      @mariajiao4855 11 месяцев назад

      They never sent human to the moon. It was all faked to compete with Soviet Union. Now they need to do that again to prove they are better than China. But times has changed they don’t have that much money anymore.

    • @truthiscensored
      @truthiscensored 11 месяцев назад

      They never went to the moon. It was in a Hollywood studio and/or Greenland at best.
      It is impossible for man to go to the moon and outer space...and Yahweh do exist. There are limits set for all creation

  • @davidhepburn9328
    @davidhepburn9328 11 месяцев назад +3

    Rushing back to the moon? What a joke.We ain't even been there yet.NASA liars.

    • @md-tu3bj
      @md-tu3bj 11 месяцев назад +1

      nasa (h5377, strongs concordance) is the Hebrew word for deception 😅

    • @Unknown-oh6ue
      @Unknown-oh6ue 11 месяцев назад

      @@md-tu3bj It’s doesn’t have sound like NASA

    • @md-tu3bj
      @md-tu3bj 11 месяцев назад

      @@Unknown-oh6ue okay unkown it’s the irony your missing

  • @chicagolifetv
    @chicagolifetv 3 дня назад +1

    Back,? We never Went😢

    • @yazzamx6380
      @yazzamx6380 2 дня назад

      So you're the USSR were stupid back then despite having an advance space program capable of sending and tracking spacecraft to the moon and beyond? :-|

  • @SecretlySeven
    @SecretlySeven 11 месяцев назад +9

    If is was so easy we did it in the 60's we wouldn't be talking like "when we finally get someone there" this renewed rush is feels like an admission the 60's landings never happened...

    • @mahalallel2012
      @mahalallel2012 11 месяцев назад

      Or they met higher beings that forbid them to return.

    • @Ruda-n4h
      @Ruda-n4h 10 месяцев назад +2

      It wasn't easy, you obviously have no historic knowledge.

  • @andrehalim469
    @andrehalim469 11 месяцев назад +10

    Surely, you mean, CGI Race to the Moon ... right?

  • @Mic_Glow
    @Mic_Glow 11 месяцев назад +8

    There is no need to launch weapons of mass destruction into space because if you have the capability to set up a colony/ move fast between planets it also means you have the technology and capacity to drop a space rock or even a "very, very fast" moving vehicle (with a tungsten rod core, because why not) onto a target. Being at the bottom of a gravity well is a big disadvantage in space combat.

    • @dusandragovic09srb
      @dusandragovic09srb 11 месяцев назад

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @TheLeftCulprit
      @TheLeftCulprit 11 месяцев назад

      Any military intelligence with half a brain has to be aware of this. Inevitable escalation. Once we start throwing rocks at each other, extinction becomes a very real possibility.

    • @Santanibalak1
      @Santanibalak1 11 месяцев назад

      I think we(my country) need to do on looters UK's land because we have capacity but not intention but looters UK's people have capability then they did loot in India
      So be careful mic 😂

  • @eddiec2913
    @eddiec2913 11 месяцев назад

    "This is our First step as a human race verses as a Chinese person, an American Person, a British person, a Kenyan person .
    We need to stop thinking about ourselves in that way and space is the way we are going to do that."
    -- Great words, nationality is just a label.
    When it comes to space ... We are all just from earth!

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад +1

      Why are we expected to deny our senses to the fact that racial differences are real?

    • @anthonylancer
      @anthonylancer 11 месяцев назад

      Because people are brainwashed.

  • @birhatkurdish
    @birhatkurdish 11 месяцев назад +26

    Rushing back???
    OR
    For the first time!!!!!

    • @Anon-gk3yg
      @Anon-gk3yg 11 месяцев назад

      Only US is rushing back

    • @peteright71
      @peteright71 6 месяцев назад

      *To See Is To Believed! False- never be- TRUE -never be false!!!*

  • @ArnoldWind
    @ArnoldWind 11 месяцев назад +4

    As Carl Sagan puts it, we are all one species.

    • @museonfilm8919
      @museonfilm8919 11 месяцев назад +1

      But politics and religion make many people forget that. They are busy keeping us fighting and competing with one another.

    • @philcoombes2538
      @philcoombes2538 11 месяцев назад

      Disagree...Trumpanzees in particular are not human...

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад

      Everyone has a political ideology. @@museonfilm8919

  • @DaSplatfestGurl
    @DaSplatfestGurl 11 месяцев назад +4

    And yet people say the moon landing was fake. Will they say the moon's colonization is fake?
    Also, regardless of who explores space: It should benefit the human race as a whole, not just a specific country. This is the one time where all of us, as the United Nations should stand together.
    We don't know what's out there... and it would be better to stand as one united species.

    • @MysticWizardOfMind
      @MysticWizardOfMind 10 месяцев назад

      You are definitely a lost cause. Keep dreaming. #matrix

  • @TurinTurambar72
    @TurinTurambar72 3 месяца назад +1

    Funny how NASAs lunar program has evolved into a side mision for SpaceX

  • @notsoquiet6598
    @notsoquiet6598 11 месяцев назад +9

    I guess the'll need a WHOLE BUNCH of graphics cards to pull this con off. 😘

  • @criticaltheories5222
    @criticaltheories5222 11 месяцев назад +3

    Maybe the world should turn the Sahara desert green first before we go to Mars or anywhere else outside of our planet.

    • @stephenfortin9485
      @stephenfortin9485 11 месяцев назад

      ...doesnt work like that, the saraha is how it is because of where it is on the planet ... to change that would change the enviroment on the entire planet ..

    • @criticaltheories5222
      @criticaltheories5222 11 месяцев назад

      @@stephenfortin9485 it would be a lot easier than trying to terraform Mars into a livable place

  • @preciousreading1934
    @preciousreading1934 11 месяцев назад +4

    No countries have put any men on the moon yet. I have been waiting to hear a news of human landing on the moon before I die. I am very much hopeful that India will be the first country to put men on the moon.

    • @Ethan_Roberts
      @Ethan_Roberts 11 месяцев назад +2

      Have you completely forgotten about Apollo?

  • @Servant_Of_Yeshua_HaMashiach
    @Servant_Of_Yeshua_HaMashiach 5 месяцев назад +1

    The U.S. need's to dominate in the domain of space and remain the leader of the space industries for the good of the country and the world!!💯

  • @macalister8881
    @macalister8881 11 месяцев назад +19

    Man on the moon back then 😅 they cant even get there now 😅

    • @Brian01987
      @Brian01987 10 месяцев назад +3

      its cause we never went

    • @macalister8881
      @macalister8881 10 месяцев назад +3

      @@Brian01987 not man anyhow , probes and landers but no man has ever walked on the moon

    • @Ruda-n4h
      @Ruda-n4h 10 месяцев назад +4

      @@macalister8881 What is your evidence for that assertion?

  • @quonslecn7755
    @quonslecn7755 11 месяцев назад +17

    Just polluting the surface of the moon so it feels like home!

    • @museonfilm8919
      @museonfilm8919 11 месяцев назад

      Yep, mankind will leave it's trash wherever it goes.

  • @roffa
    @roffa 11 месяцев назад +4

    Back to the moon? We've never been there. Fake landing😂

    • @benzene_sandwich
      @benzene_sandwich 11 месяцев назад +1

      get a job

    • @roffa
      @roffa 11 месяцев назад

      @@benzene_sandwich a job? It's about the fake landing the hollywood apollo stories

    • @roffa
      @roffa 10 месяцев назад

      @@benzene_sandwich like an astro actor? Tell everyone I was on the moon while I did a photoshoot in the desert 😂

    • @TonalBeef
      @TonalBeef 7 месяцев назад

      That is an incorrect statement. You do not have any proof to back it up. The moon landings are in fact real, it is an insurmountable truth. There is so much evidence in the form of photography, video and demonstrable experiments that it is impossible to disprove.

  • @lincolnmarklt
    @lincolnmarklt 11 месяцев назад +2

    We never went

  • @loganjmcquaid
    @loganjmcquaid 11 месяцев назад +9

    Moon bases let's go!

    • @inlee99
      @inlee99 11 месяцев назад +1

      Yeah, Let's go this time for real !

    • @chimagamer4157
      @chimagamer4157 11 месяцев назад

      wait till they realize they are already on mars, but shh you didn't hear it from here.

  • @abhijeetdey
    @abhijeetdey 11 месяцев назад +12

    For all mankind

    • @Pr0toPoTaT0
      @Pr0toPoTaT0 11 месяцев назад +1

      One of the best shows on right now, hands down

    • @SILASJP
      @SILASJP 11 месяцев назад

      It’s getting real

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад

      What a shocker that you watch tell-a-vison programming and also believe that we landed on the moon. Correlation is most definitely causation in that regard. @@Pr0toPoTaT0

  • @maggie937
    @maggie937 11 месяцев назад +3

    Bc ppl are starting to notice discrepancies in the old moon landing photos and videos. Time for a remake

    • @TonalBeef
      @TonalBeef 7 месяцев назад

      The moon landings are in fact real, it is an insurmountable truth. There is so much evidence in the form of photography, video and demonstrable experiments that it is impossible to disprove.

  • @alexmaina739
    @alexmaina739 11 месяцев назад +2

    😂My little home nation Kenya somehow came up in this video amongst all these large nations 🇰🇪🇰🇪

  • @iLLsauce
    @iLLsauce 11 месяцев назад +6

    For All Mankind has me hyped for these sort of developments

    • @adamgyorfi
      @adamgyorfi 11 месяцев назад

      For All Mankind and Kerbal Space Program fans are going to freak out

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад

      LOL! Artemis was recently delayed. How many more years of delays will it take until y'all start to scratch your noggins? We've never been to the moon.

  • @andrewday3206
    @andrewday3206 11 месяцев назад +13

    Saw Artemis-1 at NASA from Feel the Heat seats!
    What a bucket list experience

    • @fredyorozco12
      @fredyorozco12 11 месяцев назад

      You will see it again 😎

  • @Andy-te1mw
    @Andy-te1mw 11 месяцев назад +8

    We need to "for all mankind" this. 🎉

    • @filipe5722
      @filipe5722 11 месяцев назад

      Lol

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад

      Gender is a social construct rooted in white supremacies and raysisms

  • @NoName-zb1gm
    @NoName-zb1gm 11 месяцев назад +1

    If we did it 50 years ago, it should be much easier than they make it sound. They talk about it like it's a nearly impossible dream.

    • @Ruda-n4h
      @Ruda-n4h 11 месяцев назад +2

      Why should it be easier?

    • @captainhellhound7451
      @captainhellhound7451 10 месяцев назад +4

      Why should it be easier? We stopped making them for 40 years.
      If you stopped doing something for 40 years, can you suddenly pick it back up? Probably not easily. Now imagine being a 100,000+ person organization

  • @grahamjones5400
    @grahamjones5400 11 месяцев назад +12

    I would've cared 30 years ago , but at this point its not happening.

  • @TheFiretiger20
    @TheFiretiger20 11 месяцев назад +5

    if usa really landed on moon with men ..why is it hard for them do now with advanced tech , did they magically forgot or lost how to send a man to moon ?....

    • @Jst4vdeos
      @Jst4vdeos 11 месяцев назад

      You think it’s easy to get the same funding as during the Cold War space race? God you people are idiots

    • @willoughbykrenzteinburg
      @willoughbykrenzteinburg 11 месяцев назад

      1) Funding is an issue
      2) The people that did it in the 1970s aren't in the business anymore - - and even if they were, they are so far out of the technological loop that they would be zero help.
      3) They didn't forget how they sent humans to the moon DURING THE 1960s AND 1970s. Technology has advanced a bit since then, so they aren't going the same way. The hardware they will be using will be ENTIRELY new. The methods by which they will go will be ENTIRELY different. The people who are working on will be doing what they are doing for the very first time. This is just a consequence of taking an operating program and shutting it down for over 5 decades. The technology is entirely different. The people working on it are an entirely different group of people working with entirely different technology. They aren't going to the moon for the first time, but for all intents and purposes, they are doing SOMETHING for the first time - - - and that is putting a man on the moon *_with and entirely different subset of technology and equipment._* That's not an easy ask. In other words, the people who are working on putting man on the moon are indeed doing it for the very first time for all intents and purposes. That in no way means that an entirely different generation of scientists and engineers didn't do it 5 decades ago in a different way using an entirely different infrastructure of technology.

  • @chriss3913
    @chriss3913 11 месяцев назад +79

    I wasn't born when people walked the moon before, but it appears to have been just for show. Now this looks serious and I'll experience HD VR shots of the moon in a few years! If only I could help, I would work for free to see humans out of this well.

    • @r3dpowel796
      @r3dpowel796 11 месяцев назад +12

      YEah it has been half a century since USA landed on moons in the 60s they made it look soo easy. they drove cars they Jumped around.

    • @drekelley2352
      @drekelley2352 11 месяцев назад +13

      ​@@r3dpowel796they also had time to set up a camera in complete darkness

    • @darthmalum6024
      @darthmalum6024 11 месяцев назад +17

      Yeah cgi has improved a lot so they can show you in HD now 😂😂😂

    • @napobg6842
      @napobg6842 11 месяцев назад +23

      @@darthmalum6024 There was no CGI back then but people like you apparently used it in the 60s.

    • @zarjesve2
      @zarjesve2 11 месяцев назад +4

      Yes, it was only tv show back then…

  • @thiagov6123
    @thiagov6123 10 месяцев назад

    good, quality content

  • @caddystube
    @caddystube 11 месяцев назад +4

    Cant wait for them to put on the moon a solar powered video camera facing the earth. Wouldnt that be cool.

    • @derp8575
      @derp8575 11 месяцев назад +1

      Never going to happen.

    • @DROGOC0P
      @DROGOC0P 4 месяца назад

      imagine watching the planet from the moon, live. would be sick

  • @BeckyBucky3
    @BeckyBucky3 11 месяцев назад +11

    Back? We've never been there

  • @ronbradshaw7404
    @ronbradshaw7404 11 месяцев назад +6

    They find it hard to go back, cuz they never went, full stop!.

    • @TonalBeef
      @TonalBeef 7 месяцев назад

      That is an incorrect statement. You do not have any proof to back it up. The moon landings are in fact real, it is an insurmountable truth. There is so much evidence in the form of photography, video and demonstrable experiments that it is impossible to disprove.

  • @RS-rc1fp
    @RS-rc1fp 7 месяцев назад

    Very good episode! Kudos 👌👌

  • @MegaSkills9
    @MegaSkills9 11 месяцев назад +4

    No other space agency can even come close to the accomplishments made by NASA. The problem now a days is the lack or money to continue properly.

    • @lagomorphia9
      @lagomorphia9 11 месяцев назад +3

      Maybe they should rename the Ukrainian Space Agency and then the money will start to flow in.

  • @rogerstephenroth8073
    @rogerstephenroth8073 11 месяцев назад +5

    It will be interesting to see how the Space Force gets build and grows over the years with the development of the space race

    • @thatmlskid7261
      @thatmlskid7261 11 месяцев назад +1

      For all mankind 👀

    • @Superpooper-2020
      @Superpooper-2020 11 месяцев назад

      My inddia is the 0ne of the p00rest c0untry of the w0rld with the GDP per capita smaller than s0me 0f the p00rest African c0untries

  • @Ancient1341
    @Ancient1341 11 месяцев назад +30

    "cause we didn't go the first time" -Facebook user

    • @kefhomepage
      @kefhomepage 11 месяцев назад +1

      Evidence , of a mirror left there ,says we did.. you made the claim , but have given no evidence , your opinion is irrelevant then.

    • @vivekparmar7576
      @vivekparmar7576 11 месяцев назад +3

      @@kefhomepageHave you read about NASA’s reasoning of why it is hard? Read up about it; it reads like a list of excuses of a cover up (e.g., we lost the information of the shields used to prevent radiation poisoning and will need to create new materials, we lost the rocks that we brought back etc. etc.) and also why has no other country done it? The question is not that no object has landed on the moon, it is that no person has done so.

    • @kefhomepage
      @kefhomepage 11 месяцев назад +2

      @@vivekparmar7576 yet , the recent Indian orbiter took a picture of the landing site of the Apollo mission, and posted a picture of the lunar module on the surface. We landed on it , there is no doubt . As for excuses . Tell me how hard would it be to recreate the Ford model T today ? . They have to reinvent a whole new system , why? Because the demands of mission are different today and all on a much smaller budget .. the cost today of the Apollo mission was $300 billion , nasa has to do more with only $100 billion . And you still haven’t shown any proof only speculation .

    • @darthmalum6024
      @darthmalum6024 11 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@kefhomepagethey took a picture with cgi, this could be done i'm the 60 with minuatures and lighting in a studio, now tech is graphic.tech along with Ai goes beyond your imagination.

    • @darthmalum6024
      @darthmalum6024 11 месяцев назад +1

      Do you have proof you took, or just the Kubrick version of events every media parroted during decades, you just believe in it like it's a religion? , don't researchers need proof, show me yours since you are SO convinced.

  • @Y2.903
    @Y2.903 11 месяцев назад +1

    The inhabitants of the moon are not going to be happy to see us. They warned us not to return after our first visit to their planet that's why we haven't been back to their planet, they love their privacy on the moon so idk what will happen when they see us again

  • @GrowPatches
    @GrowPatches 11 месяцев назад +20

    Finders Keepers Moon Edition

    • @chimagamer4157
      @chimagamer4157 11 месяцев назад

      well then we need to rent it from ets