Why The World Is Rushing Back To The Moon
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 янв 2024
- During the Cold War, competition between the the United States and the former USSR was fierce, as the two countries rallied for the chance to make history by getting to the moon first. In 1959, the Soviet Union beat the U.S. to become the first nation to reach the surface of the moon with its Luna 2 spacecraft. But, the United States was the first country to put man on the moon in 1969, and to this day is still the only nation to have landed people on the moon. To date, only five nations, the U.S., Russia, China, Japan and India, have completed a successful soft landing on the moon. But bolstered by evidence of the presence of water and other natural resources, many more nations and private companies are now seeking to get to the moon. And whoever is able to establish a significant lunar presence first could have big implications on Earth as well as the cosmos.
Chapters:
Chapter 1 - Why go back? 2:02
Chapter 2 - Major players 5:44
Chapter 3 - First-mover advantage 9:30
Produced, shot and edited by: Magdalena Petrova
Animation: Jason Reginato, Christina Locopo
Supervising Producer: Jeniece Pettitt
Additional Footage: Getty Images, JAXA
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
Want to land your dream job in 2024? Take CNBC’s new online course How to Ace Your Job Interview and save 50% with discount code EARLYBIRD: cnb.cx/3TSmIfX
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC News on X: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
#cnbc
Why The World Is Rushing Back To The Moon
This is far better competition than firing missiles and bombs against each other
I believe even in space, we'll be shooting missiles at each other
They will be doing this in space soon 😂😂
@@pingshien91They already had.
Unfortunately its the same tech. Thats one reason why these races are so high profile.
Anybody who can put a man on the moon can put an H-bomb *exactly* where they choose.
@@pingshien91I’m mean to be fair that’s gonna be way cooler
make sure they bring duct tape for the Boeing parts lol
Hahahahaha 😂
1969 landed on the moon , it is a laughing stock, ha,ha,ha......!
21st century, US still can't send man landed on moon. It really a laughing stock..!
😂🤣
1969 landing is real. Period.
Don't forget the aluminum foil.
Imagine what we could achieve if we shared our resources instead of trying do it all on our own.
The ISS, for instance…
We'd just do nothing...
That's why you need competition. If there's no competition, none of these countries would have any incentive to do anything.
I cringe at woke peace activists. We are humans. Humans compete. Survival of whoever has the upper hand. That's how it always will be.
@@RS-ko9fx your mind(set) is so simple and incorrect. Co-operation and competition are both human features. One without the other will lead to impoverishment and worse.
because some of them want to conquer
Maj0ritty 0f us Indians can't aff0rd 2 meals a day
Chandrayan 3 strongly indicated that water just won't be on surface but under the lunar surface. Vikram(the lander) did a test on lunar surface by drilling into it and measuring the underground temperature. The result was quite interesting just a little below from surface the temperature dropped quite a lot.
Because the frozen water is supposed to be trapped in the crater where sunlight barely reaches and vikram drills on the surface of the moon. Nevertheless, the findings of drastic change in temperature within the depth of 10cm was quite an accomplishment. Kudos to India.🇮🇳🇮🇳
India 😂
@@iqbalbhq6884chuslim 😂
@iqbalbhq6884 Iqbal🤡
Lunar soil is very poor conductor of heat
Looks like the moon is going to be something else to fight over
Atleast no one lives there tho
Maybe on Earth, but then I doubt scientists on the moon would ever find it productive to be as territorial there, cooperation is most beneficial for all parties involved
The Moon needs freedom
If we really went to the moon then we would have permanent manned bases by now. Whoever establishes the first base will have control.
@@derp8575What would a permanent manned base in the Moon serve? A dry rock that has been studied for millennia is not priority over other interesting celestial bodies.
SLIM, congratulations on landing on the moon!
Thank you, JAXA!
What's so happy with an non-operational rover?
@@Chickenworm9394it's to appreciate the work done to make it reach its destination, failure is inevitable in space
It still landed successfully @@Chickenworm9394
Space exploration is for the benefit of all irrespective of which country explores it. Hope this brings the world together and put all enmities aside.
Is this verified Truth? Put food on plates? What about Cancer Patients? Inmates?
We would all get along well if it wasn't for the 1% turning us against each other.
@@narajuna think more in the benefit of humanity than individuality.
Increasing cosmological knowledge is way more important than loosing a few humans here and there although making them survive also increases the efficiency of the human race.
@@user-io7sh7nx7c I see no way this benefits humanity.
Lmao
Getting my popcorn ready for the lunar war saga
Literally Star Wars in our time
Haha. I also get my popcorn😅
It will never happen. Sorry.
This is going to be the true WW3, battle for the moon
"For All Mankind" here we come
every time i watch FAM i cry knowing i don't live in their world
@@eannamcnamara9338Get a grip.
😂😂😂😂For all mankind😂😂😂😂 Are you deluded?
@@eannamcnamara9338 Well everything in the show beginning with the launch of pathfinder (and probably sea dragon) is developed in a fantastical timeline so there's no point crying. The FAM universe is pretty much an impossibility after the establishment of Jamestown (though somewhat realistic to that point).
@@jacobdewey2053 It's still a universe i want to live in though. one where we have conquered the moon, mars, fusion and climate change, instead of floundering around like idiots
I would like the world to know that the budget for science and technology in Japan is very small, that it is done on a limited budget, and that failure is not tolerated.
Same here in India too
While INDIA has done it in less than half budget of Japan
They should first ask the Supreme Leader Aladeen if they should make their rockets pointy or not. Failure is deathly not tolerated by the Supreme Leader. 😂😅
this is north korea right?
@@ProLab. and neither would have done it without our technology
It mostly comes down to who can develop the rockets to take a lot of payload to the moon to set up a colony, because it requires huge amounts of equipment to keep a colony running. Once SpaceX has the Super Heavy + Starship running, the US is going to have a huge lead over other countries in terms of the cost per kg of transporting to the Moon. Methane and oxygen can be made from lunar soil and water, so the Starship can be fueled from the moon. I simply don't see hydrogen rockets as viable because it is questionable whether they can be made reusable, since hydrogen embrittles the metal and it is so hard to store hydrogen for long periods of time.
The speculation about taking helium-3 from the moon to power the Earth strikes me as a ludicrous idea. We already have wind and solar plus grid batteries which are cheap and scalable and have falling cost curves. Once you calculate the cost of developing helium-3 fusion reactors and transporting helium-3 from the moon to the Earth, there is no way that helium-3 energy is going to be cost competitive with renewable energy in the 2030s. Even on the moon, I doubt that helium-3 energy is going to be able to compete with solar panels + LFP grid batteries. Perovskite-silicon tandem solar cells are going to take the efficiency over 30% at commodity prices, so I don't see why any other type of energy will be used.
Sitting wondering if I should even bother looking into what kinda resources are on the moon that are worth going to try to retrieve
You're kind of refuting yourself there, amosbatto. 200 years ago, internal combustion engines were a ludicrous idea. 30 years ago, solar was a ludicrous idea. renewables have only become economically viable in the last decade or so.
We're 1 or 1.5 decades from viable helium-3? Well, thats a similar time scale to what it'll take (assuming consistent funding) to establish solid lunar bases that are safe and reliable enough to support any kind of industry anyway, so that lines up pretty well.
It takes 4 years to design and produce a car w/established tech. As any VC entreprenour can tell you, you can't set up a new industry by thinking in terms of next year's bottom line.
Wind and solar are now great short to mid-term investments, and they will mature but they will never match the energy efficiency we had w/ internal combustion. To prepare for the next economic steps of the latter 21st century we'll need something with more oomph.
The best candidate is clean fusion. We've made it work in the lab, now it needs to be scaled and industrialized.
Fast forward to April 2024 and Starship can barely get itself to orbit with zero payload. Now Elon is talking about extending the length of Starship...
People dislike the guy, but I trust Bezos and Blue Origin in the long run more than I trust Musk and Spacex.
The moon's lack of atmosphere and low gravity benefit it becoming a nominal launch platform for future missions.
I feel a colony on the moon should be first before mars. 3 days vs 6 months is hands down wayyy better.
Get a small colony on the moon first. Maybe even do tourism
There will never be a real colony on the moon! The moon has around 1/6th the gravity of earth!
@@nightlightabcdthat makes it much easier. You can carry much more stuff, the difficult part is the planets that have more gravity than earth.
Yes if the space cadets would stop delaying it by decades.
Just go already.
It is, its logically the best choice and this time Starship will help enable it, 200 tons to the moon after refuel, thats how to make lunar exploration and settlement sustainable and cheap, and also prove out all the tech, operations, and procedures you will need to survive on Mars, far away from any rescue.
Basically can not get fuel on the moon.
Idc what anyone says refining blocks of ice on the moon intonhydtogen is way way way way out there.
Making fuel on mars is extremely simple.
Just tell America that there is oil on the moon and they will send their army up there to "liberate" it.
This is funny. However do remember, where would your country be at if it wasn't for all of the fantastic things America did? (Not downplaying the bad things we've done - but as a nation, we've done things that's changed the world for the better)
There kinda is oil on the moon and the U.S. has known about it for decades. There's an abundance of Helium-3 on the Moon surface, which is a high output fuel for fusion reactions. The Helium-3 on the Moon would produce more energy than all the petroleum on Earth. Even with something that valuable, the cost of shipping to Earth is prohibitive.
@@momentary_ Americans will rush to the moon when they fear someone else going there and claiming resources until then that will be sleeping.
Freedom 🦅
@@1.blazeIT总有一群美国人，像你一样自以为是，放心这个地球少了你们只会更美好
"I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore."
-Don Pettit (NASA astronaut)
Added context - he meant that the tech they used at the time was now VERY outdated and decommissioned, and the government hadn’t prioritized spending the money on updating the tech since we won the space race
@@calebjenkinson7035 how would you know what he meant to say?
WELL SAID. Truth told in plane sight
Not even light can go to the moon in a nanosecond
Because we never went in the first place.
That lander looks like a middle school arts and crafts project😆. You’re not going anywhere in the
At thing
the space people get so triggered when you tell them the moon landing was fake 🤓😡
@@mrbigbankuchiface_3352we get triggered by morons in 2024 when knowledge is easily accessible
@@mrbigbankuchiface_3352we get triggered by morons in 2024 when knowledge is easily accessible
We landed on the moon decades ago. We're now trying to work out how we did it😂
Its not as ludicrous as you think. In the 5th Century BC, the Greeks of Sicily, of example, minted coins which were such high standard of art and aesthetics that it would not be replicated again until the 17th century. It is one of many examples of cyclic nature of Human knowledge in the span of time. We try, fail, learn, forget, and repeat.
50 years ago. to be exact.
It's called esoteric knowledge. There were likely people who knew how to mint those coins again, but they sat on the knowledge and passed it down to their children, hiding it from the commoners. @@TheScimitar2
Yup pretty much, seems suspcious.
It's called esoteric knowledge. Same with ancient pyramids. The knowledge wasn't lost. It was concealed by those who want us living in ignorance. @@TheScimitar2
Amazing work 👽👽👽
wait till they realize they are already on mars, but shh you didn't hear it from here.
It's only been 20,097 days, 15 hours, 21 minutes and 0 seconds, or 55 years, 9 days, 15 hours, 21 minutes. Technology hasn't advanced that much since then, right? Why such a rush?
Why do we use the phrases like "Getting to the moon", as opposed to "returning the moon"?
When do our leaders become honest people with the public?
Man cannot go beyond low earth orbit. 400 miles up.
Firmament.
It is weird that in 1960s, we can land on the moon many times, like going to the back yard of our house. And we even play golf on the moon. And we could have REAL TIME VIDEO CONFERENCES among moon landing module, moon orbit module and earth. And we could automate lift off with the life support modules from moon to 300 miles up moon orbit like it is nothing, even if 1/6 of earth gravity.
Those days, we have only mechanical switches and limited number of vacuum tubes.
But 60 years later, we could not even do a proper lift off from earth. And we have IC that has billions of transistors and we have progressed so much in so many technological fronts.
Modern technology is in some ways more fragile. Sometimes a simple "update" can cause your phone more harm than good. Using simple 1960's electronics operated by brave men on a manned spacecraft (as opposed to an unmanned one) seems to have been a better option in some ways.
Hey do you know that cars back in the days use to be more durable and last longer than current modern cars which breaks down a lot. Can you guess why old cheap tech is better than current expensive advanced tech? The answer is greed, modern companies cut corners and make inferior products for maximum profits.
@@onsokumaru4663 also modern electronics have much smaller components which are far more sensitive to damage, even static electricity can damage a microchip beyond repair.
We can easily repeat Apollo. The question is why and what is the immidiate return on investment.
In the run up to the peaks of Apollo program it was consuming over 2% of US GDP. The aim was to beat the Soviets and demonstrate who has the best rockets to lob the nukes. Apollo’s brief was to throw a few men & equipment to the moon, pick-up a few rocks, do some PR and come back. A single mission was no more than 2 weeks. This is very easy to repeat if there is nothing else to spend the money on.
Upcoming manned moon missions are very different beasts. To see even a half a chance of a worthwhile return on investment, future missions must enable humans to spend more than a month or even years beyond earth orbit. This is complete uncharted territory when it comes to engineering life sustaining machine habitats.
@@SafeBandicoot well said Bandicoot, well said.
That was some really smooth animation of the various moon missions. The soft landing animation was outstanding 👏
I can do better
yes, but the animation at 0.23 showing the Earth appearing from behind the moon has North America back to front. With Florida in the west and California in the east.
@richardjakobek7477 😂😂 good catch that nasa cgi artist is fired.
😆👍🏼yeah. Soooo soft landing in the studio👏🏼😆
I really hate people like you who dont believe the moon landing
What would be the projected cost for harnessing helium-3 to completely power the entire Earth for a year, a decade, fifty years, and so on?
very excited to see high definition video streaming from the moon when one of the landers successfully land on the moon
Chandrayaan 1 moon mission of India discovered water on moon’s poles in early 2000’s and since then the interest on moon has grown again and then the new synergies like minerals and launch pad on moon were realised.
AZ, we don't NEED lunar, we've known we could extract it from lunar soil since the early 1970s.
What India discovered is simply another water source. Water is EVERYWHERE on the Moon.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
That was a cartoon my man. No one has been to the moon
What these countries are trying to achieve is bigger than anyone's ego. It's the progression of the human race.
not really
@@BigBoss-sm9xjwe’re destined to become a spacefaring civilization. So yes, yes it is.
Though all countries are only thinking about their personal interests but that's also true
progression to what?
Just ego
u can land a man few decades ago and u can't do it now with tons of new technologies? 😂
If you read up on this it’s just simple logic. The knowledge and tech exists but the actual rockets and manufacturing plants are no more. Simply a matter of costs.
@@freakazoid4691 If you believe that, then the Lochness Monster, Big Foot and King Kong are real??
@@mahalallel2012 after the cold war, there seemed to be no reason to carry out such expensive expeditions and there were budgetary limitations. Sending a human to outer space is way more expensive and riskier than just sending a probe. Newer tech can make it more affordable and for a longer time to actually carry out sufficient research in outer space.
You sound like you are trying to convince yourself@@Qwerty.240
@tatata832 only reason theyre going now is money to be made
Man on the moon back then 😅 they cant even get there now 😅
its cause we never went
@@Brian01987 not man anyhow , probes and landers but no man has ever walked on the moon
@@macalister8881 What is your evidence for that assertion?
Great video.
Please, cotinue doing reports and investigations like this.
But but but Trump said/did something stupid! Need I say Kim Kardashian? And look, Kanye West!
Great video, but no new video from the moon in this video?
Investigation? LMAO, It's all property of the AP!
It's simple. Moon to Mars exponentially easier than Earth to Mars. The shuttle can be fundamentally different. It just needs to be assembled there.
I'm an aerospace engineer and you are right.
Unfortunately when it comes to engineering being right means nothing.
Who's paying and what they want is everything.
it's simple, they are getting paid to lie to their people. no one ever landed on the moon.
how do you do it in that environment? Gravity well easier yes. But you gotta build bases, launch pads, avoid dust. Sounds like a better plan if it works. @@tonywilson4713
Easier yeah if you ignore a solar radiation low gravity that destroy bones and muscles oh yeah and the ridiculous temperatures
you are correct... plus the moon can be used as a military base for ICBM launches.
Is there any pictures of videos of these countries landing on the moon?
The idea that in a few years we could finally see man return to the moon honestly excites me. Of course, however, I would have liked it if they had done it a little earlier, perhaps already during the 2000s or in the first half of the 2010s, when I was still in school or at most in high school: everyone would have talked about it in class!
Yea that's what i think to, we really should've established a base up there in early 2000s or atleast worked towards and don't have such big gape and now everyone rushing to establish a base up there
It doesn’t make sense that we’ve put nothing on the moon, no telescopes, satellite dishes, bases, or basic autonomous or remote controlled scientific labs at least, unless there secretly are or a secret reason not to, it’s an entire enormous chunk of rock that someday in the future could be very expensive real estate that nations should have long been concerned with having claim to
That's the goal, to get the masses excited. They did the same less than a decade ago when they got people excited of the possibility of putting people on Mars. Sadly they won't be returning because they cannot go to the moon.
Sorry but this will be the first time man has been to the moon…
@@Eternal_GeninSo you believe that the Artemis mission exists and will bring people to the moon, but… you don’t believe in Apollo??
I like how countries are starting to get interested in space again. But the reason why is sad. For power over other countries.
An unending race for power and money, from a single person, to entire nations, none can afford to not be part of it.
Thankfully, this world is temporary, or I would be worried for it.
If they don't do this for power they will died out. That's why everyone should seek power.@@un-Adi
That is the motivation for literally everything humans have ever done.
Im convinced the world leaders will blow this world up one day, due to one having more power..
Why improve people lifes when you can spend trillions crushing rockets into the moon until your entire country collapses... 😂😂😂
Saw Artemis-1 at NASA from Feel the Heat seats!
What a bucket list experience
Well, it would be our first time to the moon 🤓
Bc ppl are starting to notice discrepancies in the old moon landing photos and videos. Time for a remake
China didn't lose access to the international space station. China never had access to start with.
So china made their own better version
@@yuugenr7549 It had to go alone.
@@yuugenr7549Better? 😅
Yes better no doubt.
@user-th2tq1ro3m right, just like the J-31 is the "better" version of the F-35 right? 😂
I’m not understanding if our first moon landing was successful back then, why is it so hard now? Especially with advanced technology.
The tech that got to the moon was hyper-focused on getting to the moon. Then the funding stopped. That proven old tech would now have to be built up again, or we work on new tech. The current space tech is excellent for other space missions -- probes, telescopes, orbiting stations -- but long-term moon missions require a whole fresh branch of related tech. You don't just dust off an old Saturn V, stuff it full of iPads, and off you go.
Its fake
@@Bniooh bullsht, you also dont destroy the technology that sent people to the moon for the reason that in the future people would wanna go back there.
The reason they use "we destroyed the technology" excuse is because its eaiser to explain it than having to prove they can go there again. Delusional boi.
The budget to go to the moon was huge. At it's height, the moon program was spending 20% of the USA's GDP. It's significantly lower now and the tech is so different that they can't even use any of the tech from the Saturn V. Everything has to be designed from scratch.
Its fake²
5:55 You can't be serious... Have you seen the video of India's "moon landing"? It looks like a galaga ship from a video game lol. Notice how the motion is completely unrealistic and no dust is even kicked up when landing. Keep in mind that the moon has extremely low gravity so dust would be kicked up easily! Also... what were they filming with??
They have done with CGI landing and far away from south pole 600 km!
The engine was very low power.
Keep coping
@@Nuke.nSpeak for yourself and stop projecting your own insecurities.
@@MysticWizardOfMind 🤣 where are your facts
Very interesting especially the thing about helium-3 👏👏👏
Ah,yes they are going "back" to waive the flag, drive the Moon Buggy and play Moon Golf
It's unlikely that they could pull off as hoax like that again. They will keep delaying it until their new world order can be accomplished. Once we've been enslaved, nobody will think about the moon.
Finders Keepers Moon Edition
well then we need to rent it from ets
not on the moon yet and we're already talking about "who will conquer the moon first"...
well the answer is whoever gets there first
I'm not sure if Boeing should be part of this. They've had a lot of parts falling off their aircraft lately.
Why? Because China says it is going send Taikonauts to the moon by 2030, and every nation in the world knows China is going to make it
Covid on the moon
covid originated from the US@@silentmajority8365
Cut to footage of Chinese rocket landing in the middle of a village killing thousands
It actually happened look it up
@@silentmajority8365
better than Epstein Palace on the moon
@@OOsirishotep You know guys like that. Most of the leaders were WIP
Imagination: With access to near unlimited resources and scientific advancements thanks to space exploration, the earth will enter a new age free of greed and suffering.
Reality: The organizations that successfully manage to harvest the boundless resources beyond earth will use their position to advance themselves and make their leaders the richest people the world has ever seen while the 99.999% still struggle under a new monopoly.
The LYNC Corporation is hiring soon!
An inevitable reality...
Been going on apart for a long time.
robber barons gotta robber baron ...
I pray for mankind to develop our space science and technology and go out there and see what awaits us there.
Riches beyond our wildest imaginations.
(and horrors too)
Very good episode! Kudos 👌👌
Getting back to the moon in 2025 shouldn’t be that difficult. It should be easy if anything seeing that we did it back in 1969. We were far limited in technology back then.
Artemis was recently delayed. The excuse we were given was "safety concerns". LOL!
@@derp8575you want to go up in faulty rocket be my guest, you can also cover the billions of dollars of wasted investment when the whole thing goes up in flames because dust shorted out one of the tiny computer chips that are more fragile than the technology used in 69
Yes but it’s not all about that, these aren’t missions to put a man on the moon again pick up a couple of space rocks and come back.
Look into the different moon missions. They were very risky. Lots of unmanned missions failed, especially in the beginning. Once the success rate improved manned missions began and eventually it was deemed safe enough to try a landing. “Safe enough” back then is not the same as now though.
If they really went back then.
Rushing back???
OR
For the first time!!!!!
Only US is rushing back
Is sending a sat with ground ground penetrating radar to the moon not an option? W have tons of them orbiting the earth.
The reason for the south pole is MORE than water. There is serious gravitational anomaly near the south pole. It is thought to be the heavy metallic core of planetoid.
-- LOTS of metal. A km or so deep.
-- what's needed to build stuff....
> Solving negative effects of micro gravity on the human body
> Preventing radiation from harming astronauts.
> Space mining ( To prevent launching everything from earth)
> Space manufaturing (Use the mined resources to create complex products)
> Cheap launch infrastructure
Once the above 5 points are solved. Space exploration will boom like never before and we will TRULY transistion into the space age. Only the 5th once is close to being solved by Starship.
"Only the 5th once is close to being solved by Starship" Even that is highly debatable
The biggest hurdle is Humans.
While we are so busy fighting one another for resources, we will take our eyes off the prize, and then it may be too late.
Imagine if we just all put our minds together as a whole and doing this. Aliens are laughing at us wasting resources as individual countries instead of combining resources to succeed at the same task.
humans are too tribal, and tribes tend to wipe themselves out
"National boundaries are not evident when we view the Earth from space. Fanatical ethnic, religious or national chauvinisms are a little difficult to maintain when we see our planet as a fragile blue crescent fading to become an inconspicuous point of light against the bastion and citadel of the stars." - Carl Sagan
Yah. US is preoccupied to fight forever wars against anybody and perceived enemies. It's war expenditures is so huge of tax payers money that if combined together could provide homes for all americans, instead of funding global wars.
Actually this isn't bad thing. Healthy competition is good.
One solo body controllimg everything usually make rigid idea.
That's because they only want to use it for their own selfish motivations and they don't want to share any benefits or resources they find with other countries
If i had a spacecraft i would already be living on the moon. I dont want to live on this planet anymore 😅
You could try Uranus?
Now we are literally told that planet Uranus smells bad. They are mocking us at this point. @@museonfilm8919
Cant wait for them to put on the moon a solar powered video camera facing the earth. Wouldnt that be cool.
Never going to happen.
How do they keep a straight face 🤣
When most people are willing to believe the lie, it's easy. One thing I noticed about NASA fans is that they watch a lot of tell-a-vision. Combine that with fluoridated water and vaccines and you have the perfect slaves. They willingly place their mind's into shackles.
Bring extra curtain rods to replace the curtain rods on the old moon ship 😊
The JFK speech at Rice includes an aspiration to survive temperature several times higher than anything before.
The temperature at 1 a.u. is 125°C.
If is was so easy we did it in the 60's we wouldn't be talking like "when we finally get someone there" this renewed rush is feels like an admission the 60's landings never happened...
Or they met higher beings that forbid them to return.
It wasn't easy, you obviously have no historic knowledge.
Weren’t we there like 70 years ago with vacuum resistors, black and white tv’s and blinky lights. Why does it seem more difficult now?
It seems more difficult if you’re ignorant and paranoid.
@@mrblue99999so the one asking is ignorant and paranoid ?
It can be faster and easier if you spend 20 billion per year just like Apollo program. Instead NASA spent about 8 billion per year on Artemis program.
@@mrblue99999 aren't you a smart cookie
Yes. The one who doesn’t have the slightest clue (nor wants one) but instead imagines a grand fantasy. That’s the definition of ignorance and paranoia.
For All Mankind has me hyped for these sort of developments
For All Mankind and Kerbal Space Program fans are going to freak out
LOL! Artemis was recently delayed. How many more years of delays will it take until y'all start to scratch your noggins? We've never been to the moon.
We never went the first time lol
good, quality content
Guy buys house on the Moon;
Uh guys.. Why is there a massive ASTEROID Heading This Way?😮
"There is nothing in the desert.And no man needs nothing"
It is quite interesting, what natural resources might be there that could be worth such an investment? Or what capabilities are possible by doing such a thing?
Helium-3 is a rare isotope on Earth, but it is abundant on the Moon. Throughout the space community lunar Helium-3 is often cited as a major reason to return to the Moon. Despite the potential of lunar Helium-3 mining, little research has been conducted on a full end-to-end mission
Water in space is water we dont have to launch into space. This saves hundreds or thousands per pound. Having water in space means humans can live there.
Space-based solar energy.
Our sun shines out trillions of times more energy than humanity currently uses. It’s going to shine for billions more years.
We already know how to use solar in space and have for over 50 years. Virtually every spacecraft in the inner solar system uses solar energy.
Terrestrial solar suffers from weather, land use and night. Space-based solar has none of these. 24/7/365 base load energy that can be beamed down to anywhere on Earth. More than enough energy to supplant every other source of energy on Earth. An energy market worth $trillions each and every year. Supplant oil from politically troublesome regions. No GHG emissions. Energy for desalination to make the deserts bloom.
Imagine having all our mines and factories out in space or down some shallow gravity well like Moon. And having Earth available as just a garden for us to live on, without disturbing its ecology.
@@death_paradewould then workers commute regularly between earth and moon?
A great behind-the-scenes look for the new “Expanse” prequels 👍
I wish they were making more of those. That series was criminally underrated
5 minutes after China lands humans on the moon:
the moon has always been an integral part of China for centuries
When Hanlon said a Kenyan person, I felt included 😊
same😜😋
Watch *For All Mankind* - an alternate history show where the Soviets landed on the moon first and the Americans responded by funding many more moon missions. Eventually they build bases on the moon and technology gets so advanced that they make it to Mars by the 90s.
Have to wait for an actual moon landing first.
Kubrick managed to land in the Nevada desert in the late 60s.......and that's the nearest we have come since then.
@@briansmith8490 bro, the moon landing was real
Hi Bob
Hi Bob
Recently discovered this show. finished S1 & S2, halfway in S3. I hope they make to Titan by S5
How was it so easy in the 60's-70's and now it's an ordeal?
I know right they make it sound like its humanity 1st time landing on moons but if we all watch the videos in the 60s it looks too easy.
It was hard then too though. But also, the people who did that are not able to work anymore, much of that experience was lost
@@ChrisRobin-zg1yr or it was faked theory is true
They never sent human to the moon. It was all faked to compete with Soviet Union. Now they need to do that again to prove they are better than China. But times has changed they don’t have that much money anymore.
They never went to the moon. It was in a Hollywood studio and/or Greenland at best.
It is impossible for man to go to the moon and outer space...and Yahweh do exist. There are limits set for all creation
Interesting documentary, first American one i’ve seen thats interesting and asked educated questions
Like most retro stuff that is back in style, the space moon is also back in style...
Bro it’s soooo hard, we did in the 60’s 😂
With a calculator. Imagine if they brought a ti 84 on that shiz
I like your sarcasm..😅
For your information recent NASA attempt to soft land on moon failed, another private mission by US failed to even reach the moon orbit....so yeah it's still hard
@SurajGupta_3D
If it's hard to land a man mission today..it was a impossibility in the 60s..😅
@@g4agito16No. It was hard to learn to speak Xhosa in the 1960s, and it's still hard to this day.
1969年“登月”，现在连火箭都上不去，说资料丢了😂😂😂
😂 wonder if the studio in London is still available they could add in some Pink Floyd music
A great behind-the-scenes look for the new “Expanse” prequels
Over 50 years later......
I'm surprised they haven't already got base's on the moon....
(Or are they on Mars?)
Moon first, then Mars. Makes complete sense. We don't even have a base on the Moon and some people talk about COLONIZING Mars lol 🤣
Only Elon and fan boys thinking that
This punkmoron thinks anyone interested in Space is a SpaceX Fan! Such ignorance in this day and age!
your lack of knowledge in this subject is evident
I don't know why you think that's funny. There is no need to build a Moon base in order to go to Mars. It's possible to go to Mars from Earth orbit for relatively little money.
Amazing
If we did it 50 years ago, it should be much easier than they make it sound. They talk about it like it's a nearly impossible dream.
Why should it be easier?
Why should it be easier? We stopped making them for 40 years.
If you stopped doing something for 40 years, can you suddenly pick it back up? Probably not easily. Now imagine being a 100,000+ person organization
Mark my world Artemis will keep getting delayed until they get their cgi down.
Or until they are able to successfully depopulate the masses and enslave the remainder. They won't have to fake a moon landing again.
dude the CGI is ready to go. You havent seen the deepfakes?
This video just proves to me that we never landed on the moon... your telling me that 50yrs later with all our technology we are struggling to land on the moon but they did it before computers were really useful tools.
Yep that's what I gather out of this video too. I still believe the research I've done about the original landings. I've even done the math now. 240,000 miles to the moon / 14 days / 24 hours per day = 715 mph. Or traveling the speed of sound for 14 days.
Bigger question is with all these moon landings, why is there no footage from the moon's surface? Why is it all CGI?
We're not struggling to land on the moon. It's not like we are trying and failing? Nobody has TRIED to put humans on the moon since Apollo. It's still going to be a matter of testing. The next time we put humans on the moon, it will be with an ENTIRELY new technological structure - and it will still need to be tested. They've already started that process with the Artemis program - the next program with goals of landing men on the moon again. Artemis I has already flown. Artemis II plans to send humans around the moon. Artemis III plans to land humans on the moon again. It's a process. The people who put men on the moon during Apollo aren't in the business anymore, and if they were - they'd likely be so far out of the loop technology-wise that they would be little help. We aren't building a 1970s spacecraft. We are building a 2020s spacecraft. There is a difference, and it still requires testing and time. But to say we are "struggling" to land on the moon is just an absurd fallacy.
Also - computers were EXTREMELY useful tools during the Apollo lunar landings. They could not have done it without them. That's just patent nonsense.
Rocket technology has not progressed much at all and although modern computers are far more sophisticated, they are far more vulnerable to particle radiation than those that used low density integrated circuits and magnetic core memory, both of which are extremely radiation hard, so a new solution has to be found to a different problem. There is also no cold war imperative and no time limit placed on it by a president. We also live in much more risk averse times. All these issues are what has caused it to take so long this time around.
Smart man
We haven't attempted to land on the moon. If you climbed Mt Everest 50 years ago and have made no attempt to climb it again since, would it be fair for me to say, "you're struggling to climb Mt everest, therefore I don't believe you did it"?
No.
Also, it's "you're"; not "your".
Ever time. You people are idiots.
1:18 who drew the earth so big in that graphic?
simple answer, Fuel for fusion, and it's easier to create new materials in Zero G, or near Zero at least.
There is no need to launch weapons of mass destruction into space because if you have the capability to set up a colony/ move fast between planets it also means you have the technology and capacity to drop a space rock or even a "very, very fast" moving vehicle (with a tungsten rod core, because why not) onto a target. Being at the bottom of a gravity well is a big disadvantage in space combat.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Any military intelligence with half a brain has to be aware of this. Inevitable escalation. Once we start throwing rocks at each other, extinction becomes a very real possibility.
I think we(my country) need to do on looters UK's land because we have capacity but not intention but looters UK's people have capability then they did loot in India
So be careful mic 😂
its sad when N A S A got amnesia, all of their data, effort and money spent was vanished
It will be interesting to see how the Space Force gets build and grows over the years with the development of the space race
For all mankind 👀
My inddia is the 0ne of the p00rest c0untry of the w0rld with the GDP per capita smaller than s0me 0f the p00rest African c0untries
You start extracting resources from the moon, you change its mass. That will affect the moons rotation and Earth's tides.
"Soft landing are typically the most costly missions."
NASA: Yes. We needs billions of Dollars.
India's ISRO: We'll do it with $75 million tops.
Get the data how much ISRO scientists get & how much NASA & ESA scientists get. India considers everyone even scientists as cheap labor
I bet you are not a space nerd
You do not have any idea about nasa missions
Usa have cheaper and most advanced rockets today
nasa lie
Editor fabulous work 👏.. thank for you that you editing skill made me watch full video with interesting view and Understanding Of space Geo politics 🙂. Commenting from India 🌏
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
This is inevitably going to cause conflict on the moon, wouldn’t be surprised we’ll see small arm wars on the lunar surface except this time around private entities will be a new player in the game
Same concept as Colonies on earth. And what happens when Argentina is trying to take the Falklands from the British in 1982?
I love the rather optimistic conclusion.❤
I support the finders keepers logic. It will force everyone to kick space exploration into overdrive
As said in the video, how do you will enforce the law in the space? Especially when China is your competitor?
@@digitalartist779 Same way you enforce law in Earth.
Whoever has the most power, of whatever type, will enforce their laws as has been always done.
@@zoratsuki Inb4 outworld nuclear wars
@@RepentandbelieveinJesusChrist. Religion is a well managed story, Mr. jesus
No thank you, this kind of thinking is why there exist a treaty between all nations about the moon and space.
The outer space treaty states:"The treaty forbids countries from deploying "nuclear weapons or any other kinds of weapons of mass destruction" in outer space. The term "weapons of mass destruction" is not defined, but it is commonly understood to include nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. The treaty, however, does not prohibit the launching of ballistic missiles, which could be armed with WMD warheads, through space. The treaty repeatedly emphasizes that space is to be used for peaceful purposes, leading some analysts to conclude that the treaty could broadly be interpreted as prohibiting all types of weapons systems, not just WMD, in outer space.
The treaty's key arms control provisions are in Article IV. States-parties commit not to:
Place in orbit around the Earth or other celestial bodies any nuclear weapons or objects carrying WMD.
Install WMD on celestial bodies or station WMD in outer space in any other manner.
Establish military bases or installations, test "any type of weapons," or conduct military exercises on the moon and other celestial bodies.
Other treaty provisions underscore that space is no single country's domain and that all countries have a right to explore it. These provisions state that:
Space should be accessible to all countries and can be freely and scientifically investigated.
Space and celestial bodies are exempt from national claims of ownership.
Countries are to avoid contaminating and harming space or celestial bodies.
Countries exploring space are responsible and liable for any damage their activities may cause.
Space exploration is to be guided by "principles of cooperation and mutual assistance," such as obliging astronauts to provide aid to one another if needed.
Like other treaties, the Outer Space Treaty allows for amendments or member withdrawal. Article XV permits countries to propose amendments. An amendment can only enter into force if accepted by a majority of states-parties, and it will only be binding on those countries that approve the amendment. Article XVI states a country's withdrawal from the treaty will take effect a year after it has submitted a written notification of its intentions to the depositary states: the United States, Russia, and the United Kingdom"
I’m so excited! Comedy channel and sci-fi channel are collaborating! (The joke is on the sheeple)
They do love their tell-a-vision programming. Even worse, many of them literally pay for it. Similar to buying bottled water that contains fluoride. Imagine paying to have your critical faculties destroyed.
We need to rise up away from politics and our petty issues and unite and spread across the stars.
It will change everyones way of thinking.
we will all finally be happy flying rockets
Maybe the world should turn the Sahara desert green first before we go to Mars or anywhere else outside of our planet.
...doesnt work like that, the saraha is how it is because of where it is on the planet ... to change that would change the enviroment on the entire planet ..
@@stephenfortin9485 it would be a lot easier than trying to terraform Mars into a livable place
😂 this dude talking about china claiming land that's doesn't belong to them 😂😂
傲慢与偏见
There's a guy from the USA who's selling land on the moon already. You get a certified deed and everything. 😂😅
Ho Lee Chit
Meanwhile the US claimed the whole universe to them some decades ago..
Islands near to the Philippines is waving😒
I don''t understand how this is so hard in 2024, when we did this in the 60's without the advanced technology we have today. I understand the challenge of engineering the return, but technology has advanced so far that you would think it would only provide the challenge of financing the cost.
Its being done completely different today, Starship for example is a privately developed vehicle and is vastly different in terms of design than any other rocket. Plus, the Apollo program received far more funding which allowed for faster development back then.
Because they faked the moon landing. in the 60s, it has been half a century and all I hear is Expierence lost, do people working in NASA suffering from mass Dementia? or they did not patent a scientific tocket technology?
@@r3dpowel796 Liar, the moon landing was never faked. Prove your lousy conspiracy theory correct.
Forget Starship. It burns expensive Earth methane, not cheap lunar hydrogen; that's why NASA has Starship contracted only for Artemis 3 and 4 (unsustainable).
Beyond that, lunar hydrogen burning Cislunar Transporter and"Blue Moon" lander (stationed at GATEWAY) will be NASAs workhorses for future lunar operations.
SpaceX isn't private. @@Ethan_Roberts