NASA’s $93BN Plan to Return to the Moon
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 май 2024
- To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/FuturologyChannel/. The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant’s annual premium subscription.
In two years, NASA plans to land humans on the Moon! NASA’s Artemis Program, which will establish a permanent human presence on the Moon, is currently underway. It has 4 main components: The space launch system, or SLS, which will launch astronauts into orbit. The Orion spacecraft, which will transport them to and from the Moon. The human landing system, which will transport them to and from the lunar surface. And Gateway, a space station that will support ground operations.
Already, Artemis 1, which launched in November 2022, has successfully demonstrated the SLS and Orion, by sending an un-crewed Orion around the Moon and back to Earth. The next mission, in 2024, will launch astronauts around the Moon and finally, in 2025, they will land on the surface. After this, many more missions will establish a permanent human lunar presence, serving as a stepping stone to Mars and other destinations even further into the solar system!
Source Links
www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Im...
www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/lun...
blogs.esa.int/exploration/art...
blogs.nasa.gov/hermes/2022/01...
www.northropgrumman.com/wp-co...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interna...
www.nasa.gov/exploration/syst...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_(...)
www.nasa.gov/feature/meet-nas...
www.nasa.gov/sites/default/fi...
www.ulalaunch.com/interim-cry...)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review_...
www.nasa.gov/press-release/ne...
www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis...
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/space...
www.nasa.gov/content/commerci...
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/space...
science.nasa.gov/lunar-discov...
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/space....
www.nasa.gov/press-release/na...
www.nasa.gov/sites/default/fi...
Thank you to velin3d for the amazing Starship HLS animations!
Please check out his original video at the link below:
• SpaceX HLS Starship Mo...
Video Chapters
0:00 - 2:57 Introduction
2:57 - 5:16 Space Launch System
5:16.- 6:18 Orion Spacecraft
6:18 - 8:30 Human Landing System
8:30 - 11:59 Gateway Station
11:59 - 13:26 Artemis 1
13:26 - 14:03 Artemis 2
14:03 - 15:14 Artemis 3
15:14 - 16:04 Artemis 4
16:04 - 16:42 Artemis 5
16:42 - 18:00 Artemis 6-11
18:00 - 19:06 Mars & Beyond
This video was sponsored by Brilliant 
Наука
To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/FuturologyChannel/. The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant’s annual premium subscription.
(?) doez AnyOne still believe 'we' land'd on the MOON
These guys here are really doing their life efforts to say moon landing is fake. Ok guys, you have your negationism views and we know it. But this space is not for you, we think different and there's propper channels and communities to your ideas.
If they have vfx and green studios of 9B+ $ it will eork😊work
agi will be man's last invention
😂🇺🇸😂 Do you mean NASA plans to return to the moon movie set! 🎬 . The USA propoganda machine of exceptionalism. 😂😂
And the Oscar goes to NASA!🎉🎉
Probably the best video I’ve seem so far on explaining the Artemis program clearly, even on space specific channels! Great work here! Thank you
With some caveats. SpaceX is competing for the LETS lander and the current Appendix P competition is for a second lander. NASA wanted 2 landers for HLS Option A and they are getting a second one. LETS is planned for 2 landers as well.
HLS Starship launches last, with the [DELETED] Starship propellant depot launching first. The up to 8 Starship Tanker flights will refill the [DELETED] Starship propellant depot. After the Dance of the Sky Tankers is done, then HLS Starship launches to refill from [DELETED], before going to the Moon.
@@steveaustin2686 SpaceX doesnt have to compete for Sustained Lunar Development, even more, they are forbidden to. Instead their current award is extended under condition lander is upgraded to be more sustainable. And while they will have to compete for invidual missions, they do stay within the program, if everything goes according to the plans.
As for the tanker amount, from what ive heard, if my source can be trusted, its still 14. Though personally, i dont think long term for sustainability its the biggest issue. Its how much dv lander itself has beacuse for it to be reusable it needs just a bit more.
Plus other upgrades like increasing crew capability from 2 to 4, but tbh, i dont think this will be very hard, you know what i mean
@@_mikolaj_ No, SpaceX is not allowed to compete in the Appendix P competition, because they got unopposed consideration for the HLS Option B contract. The Appendix P competition is for getting a second lander to go with HLS. The LETS program is the follow on to both the HLS and Appendix P competitions and is planned for TWO landers. HLS Starship is the heads on favorite to be one of them.
From page 27 of the GAO decision to deny the HLS complaints. [DELETED] is apparently at least a propellant depot Starship variant from the context and SpaceX had the GAO redact that info. Added in Musk's payload update (~150t) that was in response to the GAO report and he says that it is up to 8 Tankers to fully refill HLS Starship, depending on HLS Starship's mass. My comments are in () and 8 Tankers at 150 tons each is 1,200 tons. Plus any amount left over when the depot goes to orbit. I doubt SpaceX will be able to get to under 8 Tanker flights.
"SpaceX’s concept of operations contemplated ten total launches (down from 16), consisting of: 1 launch of its [DELETED]; 8 launches of its Tanker Starships to supply fuel to [DELETED] (down from 14); and 1 launch of its HLS Lander Starship, which would be [DELETED] and then travel to the Moon."
The HLS Starship, even as light as it is, is basically out of propellant when it goes back to lunar orbit after the surface mission is done. For anything more than leaving the NHRO to a heliocentric orbit or landing back on the Moon, it is expected to need to be refilled by one or more tankers.
Yeah, that is what NASA said in the Apr 2021 HLS Option A Source Selection Statement (pg 10), that HLS Starship is already fit to hold 4 crew for a landing and already meets or exceeds almost all the LETS requirements.
@@tvre0 Incorrect, as the SpaceX plan for Artemis III includes what is apparently a propellant depot from the context. Here is the text from the GAO report denying the HLS Option A complaints from Blue Origin and Dynetics.
Page 27, [DELETED] is apparently at least a propellant depot and SpaceX had the GAO redact the info on it.
"SpaceX’s concept of operations contemplated sixteen total launches, consisting of: 1 launch of its [DELETED]; 14 launches of its Tanker Starships to supply fuel to [DELETED]; and 1 launch of its HLS Lander Starship, which would be [DELETED] and then travel to the Moon."
Musk responded to the GAO report by saying that they info was old and with the ~150 ton payload to LEO, it was up to 8 Tanker flights. So it would then be, 10 total flights with 8 of them being the Tanker flights.
The NASA IG said in 2022 that they expect the Artemis III date to slide into at least 2026, possibly from Starship and/or the spacesuits for the landing.
Yea! The best video! Got that right! ...'cuz that's what it is. VIDEO. NASA have to keep lying to the world to get these $100BN in fake CGI programs. They know we can't go nowhere, that's why the keep you sleeping w/ CGI video games! 😁
Nasa has been announcing a "return to the moon in the next 5 years" for the past 40 years!!
Possibly the next 40 years
not really!!
@@BFAO1621 Yes, really. Maybe you are too young. I'm 50 and I've been waiting in anticipation since I was 10. I keep getting promises from them every few years....since I was 10.
@@thesocialartsclub9095 : Probably due to rising costs.
@@paganphil100 or it's all bullshit that can't be done, worth a thought🤔
By far the most comprehensive and detailed but easily digestable explanation of the entire Artemis program, the history leading up to it and its key elements and contributors like this is outstanding, I'm gonna link this to anyone who hasn't heard of Artemis or is confused about it because this video is basically the big picture summary of it all and its awesome.
Lies again? Full Moon FNB Money
Damn. NASA should hire this guy to promote their missions. This is a very well designed presentation.
whose to say he isnt already? ayyy you never knoe
i love that there is a concrete plan for setting up a lunar outpost. whats happening in space is really not talked about enough as i was unaware of these plans. seems like the media only rarely pay attention wich is a shame but this makes me exited to see the progress we make in the coming years
if you know where to look, you can find out more info
Too much shit going on on earth, that actual positive shit gets pushed to the background.
Plenty of shit going on previously, research Vietnam war and Black Rights in USA, and was plenty of opposition to spending money for moon rocks.
Some folks dont get the positivity of Mooning or Spacing, with still troubles down here. Those aware how deadly Space is, and Murphy's Law may hit anytime upthere to....
Honestly would rather nasa use that 100billion to repair the USA since our government won’t
prob cause its all fake so theyd rather keep you distracted with politics and epsteins island
I remember watching Artemis 1 launch live on November 16th, 2022 at 1:47 am. It was my birthday, I had stayed up all night just to see it launch. I remember laying in bed watching the live stream on my phone. I can’t think of a better way to spend my birthday than laying in bed watching the first rocket ship of many return to the moon.
My birthday is 11-16-82
@@justinpetersen5273 Ayy nice! Month and day wise we share a birthday! Happy really late birthday btw.
It was boring
kids these days enjoy spending the whole day infront of mobiles and actually enjoy it!!!
@@sav145 Yeah, some parts of the internet are really interesting to look at!
For $93 billion we could stack Ikea furniture all the way to the moon and climb it.
Hahahhahahhahahahhahaaaahahah!!!!! That's probably true!
😂😂😂😂
I love space exploration programs. It truly brings us all together.
after reading this comment section, clearly not. Though to be fair the vast majority of the people against it are just dumb hicks
@@dylanroemmele906 ikr what's up with the humans how just how can they be so dum 😭
I was 4 years old when we last went to the moon, I remember sneaking down stairs and watching it on an old black and white TV, as my parents slept on a cold wet night about 4 am, in a small fishing village in Cornwall UK, it was around the same time I saw my first ever colour TV through a neighbours window, and what was the first show i saw in colour... the original Star Trek!.. fingers crossed if this all goes to plan, ill be 65 when Artemes 11 launches, how far we have come, it was only yesterday to me we watched star trek the next generation and futuristic pad screens, the same things we take for granted now as i pads.. i do hope i live to a ripe old age(82), and see us step foot on mars, which im guessing will be about 2050, then ill feel iv come full circle and be content.
There's a chance we might get to Mars before 2050 through private companies or if NASA's plans go through without any problems. Which I personally hope is the case
I don't feel like it'll take an entire 30 years just to take humans to Mars. I'd wager my bet as the 2040s. Around the time Artemis 5 is complete, humans should be living and working on the moon and also on Gateway (the lunar space station). It's way cheaper to launch rockets from the moon (less gravity) and gateway will allow human missions to mars. Honestly i'd expect 2025-6 being humans setting foot on the moon again (artemis 3), and 2037ish being mars.
edit 2023: changed bet to 2040s
@@mymixedbiscuit9159 you're probably right now that I think about it. progress has been happening rather quickly as of recent with things like the Space X Starship prepping for its first orbital test flight and the Artemis Missions given that artemis 1 was pretty much a success and the crew for Artemis 2 has already been selected.
@@mymixedbiscuit9159 i hope so my friend, im 55 so not much time left... i hope you get to see it though x
it was fake sorry to tell u
It would be so cool to get a permanent space base on the moon
To what benefit? The moon has been described as a worse habitat than the artic. Mars has a actual goal since it can be turned into a habitual planet
@@strategygaming5830 for reasons stated in the video, mining, observation, and of course, early colony testing. This will be the first time humans will settle anywhere off this planet, so they'll need a colony to monitor and keep track of that's relatively close. even so a permanent moon colony is the perfect place for starting space civilians, and regular first time space tourist. it could also play the role as the space version of "ellis island" in the future when more colonies start to get set-up
@@PancakeBoi yeah I guess you are right, I didn’t think of it in that way. It would also be cool to have a space prison but if we are going that far to keep someone in jail they better be a National leader or should just get the death penalty.
I would rather the 93B used to fix whatever that’s wrong with earth right now. Diseases cure/poverty/food/medicine/education but no let’s go to the moon just o say we’ve been there
Why? Its a huge waste of money. You cant go from there to mars. You go from Earth to mars. This will waste money better spent on mars.
All the refueling missions are discussed here 3:33 thanks for covering it so comprehensively
There is something about the cooperation and scale of this program that's just unbelievably awesome...
7:56 NASA wanted 2 HLS landers, but the 2020 Congress only gave NASA 1/4 the funding that NASA asked for to get 2 landers. So NASA started the competition for a second lander, that will go along with the HLS Starship. For Artemis III, it is HLS Starship that will take the crew to the surface of the Moon. Artemis IV, will be either HLS Starship under the HLS Option B contract OR the new lunar lander. Artemis V, will be whichever lander isn't used on Artemis IV. Artemis VI+ have yet to be funded, but are expected to swap between HLS Starship and the second lunar lander. Just like Dragon and Cygnus have swapped off taking cargo to the ISS and Dream Chaser is expected to join them in 2023 or 2024. And how NASA wanted Crew Dragon and Starliner to swap off taking crew to the ISS.
The current competition is under Appendix P for a second lander. Both that lander, HLS Starship, and others can compete for LETS.
This video's quality is astonishing, never seen anyone explain the Artemis program that well !
NASA is laundering tax money.
That's the best way to explain them HONESTLY
Thank you so much for making a easy-to-understand and probably the best video I have seen depicting the Artemis program.
I just found this channel and I am already hooked.
I remember watching the launch of Artemis I and having my parents come into the living room wondering what I was doing then when I told them it was the launch of the Artemis I rocket they were so confused and I had to explain that it was kinda like a successor to the Apollo program and then they had an existential crisis.
If there were a poll I would be on the negative side. Maybe by 2028. I have no faith in Boeing being able to meet it's target.
Boeing maybe. Space X definitely not lol. Musk been saying self driving cars would be ready by 2016 and they’re still not in 2023
David your are correct! Boeing is a organization that's been Grifting Tax payers for 3 decades! 🥵
@@mixedbyap well for space musk has a better tendency that Boeing. Starliner is close to 4 years behind and the amount of scams that happened is insane. Crew dragon finished on time and has a better reliability than Boeing starliner
@@mixedbyap SapceX delivers tho. Elon is just an over optimistic idiot who doesn't know what he's talking about, I remember when he said they'd do the first Starship OTF in November.
Don't blame the companies for the things he says
Jokes on you but if anything delays first landing to 2028, at this point its spacex.
im so glad that these videos are like 95 percent well received. we should be so much more excited about this collectively! ive told 3 people about this and each one said "thats cool." why arent people more hyped!
the "thats cool" element hits hard
why should i be hyped
@@prodbyfm because going to the moon is exciting you buffoon
Because it's a LIE. People still believe that the first moon landing was real without actually just spending 20 mins looking at the actual facts that prove it was fake. Little tin foil lunar lander. They literally trolled.
The only thing that's different now is that they have the cgi technology to will make to fake it more effectively now and it will be hard to detect
Is that why it took them 60 years to go back to the moon? Because "they lost all the technology" and had to build it back up again
Okay but what about black people? This is just furthering white supremacy while black people are suffering all over the world, especially in Western countries. How does going to the moon help ME?
And in 2060 we will develop pelicans and X-wings for personal space flight 😂😂😂
How easy you made this to understand!! Awesome job
This is by far my favorite video so far in detailing the Artemis missions. Quality content 👏
I know, these aren't many views but I hope you don't take the youtube algorythm seriously and continue producing breathtaking videos.
Thank you! Hopefully it does well over the long-term but I’m not too worried. We’ll keep producing the best content we can!
@@gcnradio4662ay man, it's not so nice to call people A.I.bots in every comment.
Jeez man, you guys explained everything so simple and clearly!
This channel provides informative visuals to help understand the Artemis mission. Channels such as this one should grow at the same pace as the speed of SLS..🚀🚀🚀
Excellent production on Artemis. Everything is laid out in a clear and concise manner.
Thank you for using proper units in all of the explanations, Greetings from Germany.
fr
That's probably the most badass Moon Rover I've ever seen....🔥🔥🔥
Amazing video as per usual! Been wondering when we will go to the moon again and this video gave me all the information I need! Going to set many milestones and space records. So excited for this!
Started thinking. (Never know where that can lead ...)
From Columbus to Roanoke, first European settlement in N. America, was about 60 years. (Oh, and it failed. Jamestown was next and it lasted a long time.)
From Armstrong to Artemis is a bit longer, almost 70 years.
We're pretty much right on time.
Retired librarian
@@veramae4098Librarians retire? When I'm that age there won't be retirement per se, I would like to be a librarian for my retirement job.
With the number of companies and world governments involved in the program I will be surprised if by 2030 we see humans back on the moon....but damn I want to witness it so badly
Disney may save the day, by doing a remake of the old film called "The Moon landing".
@@pqrstzxerty1296 And this time, maybe in 3D 🤣
Not all world leaders are allowed to go. Sad…
@@drakeplus2858 who's stopping them LOL
@@pqrstzxerty1296And the moon is colored.
Excellently produced video. Thank you.
I just hope i will be around to see every single launch and experience everything. It will be an amazing ride no doubt! Great to see we are starting to dream again!
I genuinely hope i get to experince all of this in my lifetime, its such an exiting time to be alive, and I just want to keep seeing more of the amazing things we do
Most of this will be happening this decade or the next...
Best video I've seen explaining the program! This is so col. I hope it happends successfully and doesn't get cancelled.. would be very exciting to watch
as what many have said, i love how this video thoroughly explains the programs plans for future missions, and as well as animations being so perfectly visualized. it makes wonder if this is how they’ll look in the future. much thanks futurology :)
Gotta love how we have to make it a big deal that it has to be stated that it's the "first woman and first person of color" to land on the moon instead of it being "human kind" where everyone is seen as one instead of trying to make someone feel special
Straight facts
I agree but still I think it is ok to say first woman on the moon as well as black man
Woke NASA .. time to dissolve the agency
For all mankind vibes 😍 very clear explanation on something that marks the next steps for our civilization
Thank you for reporting the future for NASA and manned spaceflight. This will be different than when the Apollo missions where going on in the 1960's and 1970's. Back then I was a teenager and a young adult. This is an exciting time to be alive. Not Star Trek but with our present technology it is a big step.
Nasa admits they no longer have the technology to get to the moon, they lost it. They also taped over the original unedited video footage.
Weird
@@chriscrawl3732 Of course they don't have the technology for another moonlanding just laying about. You can't seriously believe we would go back using tech and computers from the 60's? It has to be developed all over again.
@@Potatismjolner Lol... we never landed on the moon, it's not even possible to do so.
50 years before the aeroplanes reached the speed of sound brothers Wright used the flying apparatus build of wood and tarpaulin. The technological gap between space equipment today and 1969-1972 is similar or even larger. By comparison, flying to the Moon today should be a piece of cake. Somehow it still did not happen...
Maybe the Hollywood filmmakers' skills were just much better 50 years ago 😀
@@chriscrawl3732it’s not because of technology it’s the costs
Quality Of Content is really Great
Hope this channel grows Immensly!!
Good Luck❤
I watched the Apollo missions on black and white tv’s. Those missions advanced our technologies. Looking forward to HD quality views of the Artimis Missions!
I think that the Artemis program will only follow the plan through Artemis III. The SLS rocket for that mission is probably mostly built by now. The program has been plagued with delays and cost overruns so there will be a lot of skepticism in Congress for funding the development of Block 1B. If Starship is flying regularly and the HLS program goes to plan there will be discussion of just launching humans on it from Pad 39A to the moon.
Funding my ass those are just distractions
Cost over runs??? If humanity quits going to war all the time, we could collectively afford to explore outer space. Even the arms companies, who create these wars (or thier investors) could get in on it, and earn a fortune from tax payers money. They already know how to shoot a projectile a long distance, but instead of shooting a projectile terestrialy, to kill human beings and humanity, they could put human beings inside the projectile, and shoot them extraterrestrially, eventually saving humanity.
Starship will never be ready
@@wehrlesimon99 🤡
@@wehrlesimon99 Ikr! What a mindless decision by NASA to put all their bets on Starship HLS.
Very nice video! Everything explained in details yet simple and understandable for every body.
Thanks
People need to realize this isn’t your typical vague promise..also this is bigger than walking on the moon. This expands us past the earths typical space programs. We’re going to have a space station circling the moon, a permanent moon base. Special bug out vehicles… a space ship moon lander that’s 6 stories. The heavy boost rocket is what made it possible.
5:38 That is the Apollo Command Module, NOT the Command/Service Module. The service module is Apollo's equivalent of the SLS' Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage, also providing power for the command module.
The fact I may live to see an actual colony on mars makes me so happy and excited
No chance lmaoo. Stop being delusional
@@NPCSpotter shut up you don't know lol
@@NPCSpotter the chances may be slim but it’s not impossible. Even if it’s near impossible I still wish to think that it will happen. Gives me excitement for humanity’s future and gives me something to look forward too.
Would have to travel 300 million miles, for reference the moon is 250,000 miles away lol 😂
😂😂😂😂 you actually believe this nonsense.
Just one thing has changed. NASA has recently announced that a flexi-rover will be landed by an uncrewed Starship, the lunar cargo variant. As well as being robotic, this two ton rover can also transport crew so will become the unpressurised mobility rover.
Really good video, super clear and informative.
Great presentation. Great graphics. Thanks!
This was a great video that really details the future of NASA. Thank you.
This is just spectacularly done ❤
Can’t wait for the Artemis missions
One the best video I’ve ever watched💯🔥 So much research.
So much delusion
@@williamborregard6384 huh, why?
@@TheTiredAndSleepyOwl can’t go back to a place that they’ve never been
So much money that poverty stricken people and homeless could really use.
What an era to be alive man..
Indeed 😎🔥
I’m pretty sure if nasa wasn’t so hesitant after the challenger launch we’d be at mars by now.
It wasn't just Challenger, thee were a lot of other reasons too.
Man I hope they live stream all of the missions
I am 44 and it would be amazing to live to see the day that we settle our solar system. What a time to be alive!
By the way, in less than two hours NASA and Candian Space Agency (CSA) will reveal the crew for Artemis II. It will consist of three NASA astronauts and one CSA astronaut.
Great video! It makes me wish I was young enough to become an astronaut and fly one of these missions!!
It makes more sense to leave old HLS starships docked to gateway to provide dramatically more habitable volume than it does to dispose of them by sending them to a heliocentric orbit.
Wow. Great summary! I can’t wait until this actually happens.
Straight 🔥 bro! Love it!
This all makes me feel very excited for the future of space travel.
Me too
17:57 is a really cool picture to imagine and watch become a reality as I look through my telescope at the moon.
FYI, Canadarm1 was on the Space Shuttles, while Canadarm2 is on the International Space Station.
12:06 Artemis I actually launched at 1:47am, but otherwise great video.
Id put money on spacex reaching the moon first before Nasa does.
People misunderstand how NASA actually works. There isn't a "NASA factory" where they build rockets. You can think of NASA as a contractor. They don't build anything. They basically just hire personnel. If they want something built (like a space ship to go to the moon), they contract some aerospace company to do it. Like when they landed on the moon, NASA didn't build the lunar lander. A company called Grumman did.
There is currently a program that plans to land people on the moon again called Artemis. SpaceX is one of the major contracts for that program, so SpaceX and NASA will be putting man on the moon at the same time - - - because they will be working together to do it. NASA couldn't do it without SpaceX, and SpaceX couldn't do it without the funding they'd be getting from NASA. This is how our space program has ALWAYS operated. There's never been a "NASA factory" where they build space ships. NASA didn't put man on the moon. 400,000 people working for hundreds of companies CONTRACTED by NASA put man on the moon. If everything goes to plan, SpaceX will indeed put man on the moon - - - and they'll do it because NASA paid them to do it. That's how it ACTUALLY works. So NASA and SpaceX will put man on the moon at the same exact time.
Because their rockets are so reliable….😂😂😂
China is already on their way there, literally. Un-crewed, sure.
Bro… NASA already landed on the moon in 1969
SpaceX can’t even make a rocket that doesn’t explode
Great video, the end was a bit ridicolous but overall great and informative
The day I can see in my telescope of lights on the moon because humans are living there, would be a monumental step for Humanity, and proof we can rough it away from earth.
I wouldn’t be surprised if gateway became a permanent habitat and research station. Like the ISS, but for the moon.
it will
That would be cool, one sad thing I recently learned though is that the ISS is not permanent and is going to crash down to earth in 2031 :(
7:34 it’s funny that they added 1 second of an alien doll 👽 into this presentation
I think making it clear to set up the moon base was the main factor … I love that they are doing this. I thought it would be better to build a base and bury it on the shady side of a crater
You went crazy with this one man!! 🔥🔥 please keep it up this is quality content 👌
7:30 The question is, is it really the Starship that docks to Gateway?
The gateway has not been built. It probably wont. This whole plan is FOS. Just a congressional ATM
I cannot begin to state how happy this video made me feel. The idea that my dream of humans living across the stars is this close, I know ill likely never see us in another galaxy, but seeing structures on the moon and mars, now that's a beautiful thought.
It'll be my SECOND viewing of manned lunar missions.
When they return to the moon, please give Santa Claus my best.
Nice
6:35 banana for scale.
Surprised there isn't a football field for the Americans ...
NASA better get their graphics right or else some people might question
I like the thought put into this project. Can't wait to see it come to fruition neXt year. Mister X
I'd bet my life and everything I own that NASA won't land humans on the Moon in 2 years 😂
Well don't be sorry when it's time to collect then lool
Now that is dependant on nasa space, it aint accurate, moon is much closer and Nature doesnt do in vacuums.
I wish I could like this video multiple times over 😍 I love space so much!
Take your finger out of your ear.
ME TOO
@gcn RADIO bruh
The Apollo program was really amazing. 7 starts heading to the moon for landing and all but one (Apollo 13) did succeed and all executed in 4 years time. The Artemis timeline is very slow compared with Apollo. The SpaceX lander looks very risky to land on the uneven moon surface, it will tip over and create a tragedy I fear if the ratio of height to width do not change.
NASA needs more funding.
travelling to Mars might be possible probably in the 2040's but beyond that going to the outer solar systems moons like Titan, Europa might take awhile as these missions really costs a lot of money and the dangerous journey going there
going to europa and all those other planets and celestial bodies probably won't even be in this century, or at least anything meaningful :(
Hope Jupiter doesn't suck the spaceship when going there
Between 2035 and 2040 for a mars landing robot builders is expected to land in 2030 to build the big dome for humans.
@@zachflannery6750hahaha... do you people actually believe any of this? Nasa admits they've lost the technology they used to get to the moon (whatever that means).
Incredible video!
the ksp sounds really make it cool
It’s crazy how landing on the moon seems so futuristic and yet we did it over 50 years ago
It’s amazing how fast competition with the Russians (or China) will light a fire under our asses 🤣
No we didn't.
We never landed on the moon and anyone that believes that hasn’t done their research.
proof please @@foxtrotthree569
proof@@chriscrawl3732
Great video as usual, 🎉 keep up the great work 💯
ISRO also signed The Artemis Accords
9:40 that is a falon heavy btw not a falcon 9 :D
Man, you have just made me happy and after watching this video I am sure that humans are no longer a earth being but also a space being
Starship looked so freakin cool in the air.. It's sooo BIG! That shot of the 2nd flight where they attempted booster seperation before both vessels exploded has got to be one of the most incredible videos ever
The idea of a lunar village gets me so thrilled. Damn!
NASA has a great orchestra and pianist
The HLS (Starship) sure looks pretty "tippy" to me. Apollo 15 landed 11 degrees from the horizontal, I wonder how HLS would handle that ? I'm still stunned the lander contract didn't go to one of the other two entries as they both looked like more conventional landers - less height and more width.
I know nothing about any of this but that was my initial instinct when I saw how tall and thin it was. Have they explained their rationale for using it in depth?
A lot of the weight of a starship is the engines and propellant/fuel. those will naturally be at the bottom, meaning that the CoM is far lower than it looks like.
simple...starship can carry more and its more likely overtime to be reusable. that alone makes the artemis program sustainable.
reality is without starship, artemis isn't sustainable at all...it will literally be almost has expensive has the apolo program, which is something NASA does not want!
plus, ever heard of self leveling legs?
height and width means nothing has long as it performs has expected, plus the ohter lander's have plenty of problems which also evolve height and width...so its not just a spacex problem!
@MF Nickster True but those surfaces were flat and hard surfaces (both the landing pads at the launch site and the unmanned barges at sea). Plus none of the landing first stages of Falcon were manned. As we know from the Apollo landings the moon is neither flat nor hard.
I'm certainly not saying SpaceX can't do it as they've proved in the past they can work out bugs pretty quickly. However they've only got 2 years (Artemis III is currently scheduled to land on the moon in 2025) to get it human rated.
@@mazdaman0075 Indeed, there were some hairy landings on Apollo but the superb design of the LM and the astronauts skills saved the day. I don't wish to be disparaging but is this generation of astronaut in the same league as Armstrong, Shepard and Conrad? Perhaps they don't quite need to be.
i hope this time they will do it for real
Lol 😂yep this time with CGI
first 6 landing was real.. you just cant accept the fact.. silly flerfs
Moon dust is like a fine glass powder that grinds up space suits. Meteors constantly pound the dark side of the moon which can’t be seen from earth due to rotation speed , amazing coincidence.
I've got an android phone from 2010. Apparently that's more than enough computing power to figure this all out.
I'm not even sure what NASA's worried about it's routine.
Computing power doesn’t get you to the moon, rockets do
It was in the 60's but we're not using 60's tech anymore, are we?
@@Potatismjolner That's the entire point.
Yet you still missed it.
What I don't understand is, isn't all of that useless with the Star ship from SpaceX out performing every single aspect of Artemis, the starship can carry 100 tons.
Yes. But the elites can't siphon off 93b and decades of delays and cost over runs.
this is all just plans, just like starship is just a plan right now. my guess is, everything goes right with starship and by the time of artemis 5 or 6 rolls around it will be winning contracts for all the major moon and mars missions, being that it should be the ultimate in cost(reusability), cargo capacity, human capacity, and its a lander all in one.
If everything goes good with starship then, yes everything beyond artemis 4 or 5 would be useless and starship will take over full operations. Even then I'm sure Spacex will have their own space expedition to the moon without nasa involved.
SpaceX has the inherent disadvantage of a manchild who got lucky investing his daddy’s emerald mine fortune running the whole operation into the ground.
I doubt they’ll even be relevant in 5 years or so especially given how all the talented people who made it’s few genuine achievements possible are leaving in droves.
As of writing this Starship blew up on its first test, Artemis succeeded every step on its first test. You can go with what works or keep waiting for a theoretical better spacecraft while nothing happens. Fortunately, Starship keeps developing and for now SLS is what will be used.
Absolutely Amazing!
Well done!