TOO MANY LEGO SETS THAT BREAK THE RULES!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 мар 2022
- Install Raid for Free ✅ Mobile and PC: clik.cc/9RfWz and get a special starter pack 💥 Available only for the next 30 days! 💥
🔔 SUBSCRIBE and Turn on Notifications!
👍 Leave a LIKE if you enjoy the video!
Welcome to episode 5 of the LEGO Sets that Break the Rules series! In this video, we continue our journey to discover LEGO sets that have mistakes or errors that were not supposed to happen! Be sure to watch the entire video to see ALL the funny and crazy mistakes in these LEGO sets - Enjoy!
👀 Watch Previous Episodes Here:
• LEGO SETS THAT BREAK T...
🐍 Found a LEGO set that breaks the rules? Email me a description and pictures or screenshots for a chance to be featured in the next episode!
spitbrix@yahoo.com
LEGO Set themes in this video:
LEGO Ninjago Sets
LEGO Star Wars Sets
LEGO Marvel Sets
LEGO Technic Sets
LEGO Harry Potter Sets
LEGO City Sets
AND MORE!
Have a great day!
#lego 
Развлечения
👍 Leave a LIKE if you enjoy the video!
👀 *Watch MORE episodes of this series here:* ruclips.net/p/PLRXR28fiX-kUSL_t15uh-hHjlzIR3tUbL
What did you say in the katana part?
In the koenigsegg jesko set on step 15 there is. sticker that you’re supposed to put on that isn’t there!
Page 25
@@Corruptedhope no man
@@Corruptedhope what he did say was that in the parts list it has a keytana that isn’t actually in the set
@@Goofypersonthatexistsoh and btw, what’s your favorite mobile or pc game?
12:10 seems like not only Lego makes mistakes 😂
It's all right though, if big company like Lego can make them, you can as well!
lol i noticed that error to
@@SpitBrix Indeed I did enjoy rest of it! Luckily you didn't show anything very important during said overlap.
@@SpitBrix yeah i enjoyed the rest of the video
I was about to comment something similar, but you beat me to it!
Lol
On that first one, submitted by Lucas F, you do need all 4 wings. Two on top, and two underneath. The only mistake was that it said you only needed 1 part.
Actually, you do only need one part. That square shows you exactly what parts you need to make the addition. The second box is to repeat the process 4 times. So there is NO error there at all.
@@rafalcyran8720 it's just really badly explained then?
@@rafalcyran8720 Agreed, this is how I interpreted the instructions.
@@rafalcyran8720 That only applies when the “parts required box” is inside the repetition section, like when it sometimes covers full pages. In this case, it should say that you require four pieces for the repetition section within the step.
@@rafalcyran8720 he is wrong because the square in the corner ith the pieces needed show the amount as in the next one shown. Somone probably already said this am im just lazy.
The reason why the parts sometime clip is because (from what I can tell) Lego designers use a modified version of lego digital designer (LDD) to generate the instruction booklets. As such, I would guess that when exporting/rendering the 3d models, the application sometimes glitches and shifts the x/y coordinates of the parts. Other times, it's just a mistake a lego designer made when making the 3d model.
don't the pieces stick to the "piece grid" in ldd doe? unless that modified version isn't like that
@@0DRONZER I think its different so that they can render the pieces midair being placed on, and show various segments rotated for clarity before they are applied
I wouldnt know because ive never used the software though
@@circumplex9552 I used LDD a lot when I was in college, and you can turn of the snap grid on the standard version of LDD too, you can also remove collisions. I think what happens to most of these is they remove collisions to adjust blocks on the model and they don't place them back properly.
Happened to me a lot lol.
And here I thought they just made a Lego set reverse engineered it and printed the steps out
4:40 That “large armored vehicle” is actually a vehicle that is created by combining two other LEGO Technic cars - the BASH and the WHACK. I have the BASH set, so I recognized the car pretty quickly.
I have both, so I recognized it as well.
Is this a troll?
@@Boypogikami132 No. If you look at the picture, it may take a bit of effort to make out, but it is visible. It is the half red, half green, and six-wheeled vehicle overlapping the plane.
And the kayboord is flipt
Exactly!
12:09
An error in a video about errors?
Coincidence? I think *not!*
Errorception
I noticed that, too, and came looking for this comment.
Me too
This is a series that always catches my interest, who would think that lego could mess up so much but yet it should be expected because of the amount of lego pieces that go into these sets
2nd reply
@@Mrcdndbwb wow 😮 🤯 want a medal bro?!?!? 🥇
@@TheProwlingSleepster yes
@@Mrcdndbwb we are all here today to celebrate MrSad5 on being neat, he has went through many challenges and for his efforts we award him this 🥇and I hope he will keep pushing himself to make him and the people close to him feel like they earned a place in this world. give a round of applause to MrSad5 🙌👏🙌👏🙌👏🙌👏🙌👏
Y.
For the instruction errors, I've noticed a trend: when blocks disappear, it's always something that you can *technically* do early. Almost as if they originally have steps in a different order pre-finalization and then only renumber them later, not re-edit.
Example: in the batman set, the black blocks vanish in step 11. Swap steps 11 and 6. Do 11 first in the place of 6, then do step 6 in the place of 11. Makes more sense as to why the blocks vanish.
The first one very obviously does require 4, the others are upside down. They put 1, which is correct because you repeat it 4 times. Taking one piece and applying the sticker each time.
No, they always include how many to use, the 4x thing I don't understand if there's not 4
They always give the number of how many at the top.
If you did need 4, it would’ve said 4 and not 1.
youre right about the first thing but not the second thing, so i liked and then unliked your comment
@@AminalCreacher lmao
@@paulrance5445 how much is 1 x 4?
For the first one you actualy need 4,the Botom ones are the same, there is just no arrow on them.
That is what I said in my mind!
@@JBLS_Productions understandable. it happend to me a lot too.
@@JBLS_Productions yay
I remember making this. It makes a lot of sense when you are building it. Because you do some things to build the internal engine pods just before that. So you are just covering what you just put in.
They're still saying you need 1 plate
0:57 THAT WAS SMOOTH SPITBRICKS!
Hello
4:47
Theory about the reindeer:
They wanted to use a red stud to represent "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer", but weren't sure whether or not they legally could.
They either tried getting the rights, or were waiting for their legal dept to tell them it was vague enough to be fine, but time constraints forced them to get the instructions ready before they got an answer..so they made the instructions without the nose (idea being that they would just come back and add the little step where the nose is added at the last second, buying themselves a little more time for legal to say they could use the red stud).
But they either didn't get a response in time, or the answer was "no", because it's just a black stud.
They should have included a red stud in the bag anyway so the builder could decide for themselves.
Lego would've been able to give the reindeer a red nose, just not call it Rudolph
10:39 the red axle is in the right place, if you look at the blue peg and black bar its actually the grey piece being slightly too low
0:37 you actually need 4, there's 2 more beneath.
8:34 that poor droid😢
12:19 somewhere near this i think not only lego makes mistakes!
That mixer brought back memories, I'm surprised it took this long for it to get covered for that technique
Brought memory of 6yr old me building it and thinking "hmmm this is an interesting way to connect these pieces"
The "Wedged inbetweeen 2 studs" technique can also be found in the Titanic (10294) set, booklet 1, step 268.
6:25 I've seen that happen in Bricklink Studio quite a lot, so maybe they were using studio (remember, Bricklink is owned by LEGO now) to design the instructions?
It is?
@@dawnscript1 Yes. They recently bought out Bricklink.
It's always fun to see that there are sometimes mistakes in a LEGO manual or box, especially because it doesn't happen often because LEGO always does such a good job😁
At 12:14 minutes there is an editing problem, this means there is a mistake in these LEGO builds and instructions and the video. (I know editing is hard but I just found it a bit funny.
Correction 12:12
@@ThorinCrispEven comments aren’t safe from mistakes.
Lego set 315 (Container Transport) features an 'illegal' assembly on its roof, where a plate is fitted edge-on between some studs. Of course, back in the 1970s we didn't care much about illegal and had to do the best we could with far fewer brick shapes.
I found a mistake you haven't featured yet! Set 8430 has the stickers on the back of the motorcycle flipped in the instructions. In all the pictures of the complete set the stickers have the blue part facing backwards, but in the last step of the instruction (step 58), where the stickers are applied, the picture shows the blue part facing forward.
Reindeer noses have always been optional. You have normal Flightless Caribou, Santa Reindeer with noses, and the unique Rudolph subspecies, requiring a light-up brick.
0:50 That sponsor message transition was smooooooth!
5:38 - 5:39 did someone else saw a frame flashing through?
I saw it too lol
I did
Managed to pause it at the right time; it's just the same picture of the box. Guess Lego isn't the only one making mistakes!
Same, box image on white background. NERDS!
Im so happy that this series still continues to this day because its interesting to find these mistakes that only appear in some sets while there are thousands of lego sets!
Keep up the good work SpitBrix!
I think I remember one of my old Mixels sets having one of those page separation mistakes and another one that just flat out didn’t come with instructions. Either it was really lucky or Lego really wanted to end that line by then
Either way great video
One my mixel sets came with the completely wrong instruction for another mixel haha
4:05 Thanks for including my submission!!!
I have been waiting for this part of the series. keep it up Spitbrix!
Hey SpitBrix, i was just wondering if i won because you liked my comment.
@@4THEC00L isn't it pinned ?
@@JadenTubeZ what do you mean?
Winner was Duff Buff... Like by spitbrix does not mean win...
@@JadenTubeZ Yea i was just wondering, thanks for letting me know tho.
There is an error here-12:03
Where two voiceovers start talking over each other
He wants to remind you how to get featured while telling you how the set was wrong
Australian healthcare be like: 9:45
At 10:34 you can see that the axle is sticking through the H-beam, because the H-beam is misaligned. You can see that based on the blue pin on the right side of the H-beam.
You can see it in the beam on the left too. there is an overlap.
Just finished the daily bugle and I noticed what I think is an error. When you're building the spider buggy, the instructions tell you to attach a hollow stud on a stamp piece, but when you do it as instructed, they don't attach
2:58 has to be intentional and I think it's a good way to show differences between images without too many shifts. I know when my son does creator builds on this ipad, when you switch between pages, you can see what changed between images.
In one a piece DISAPPEARS
@@ferfender007 they were only talking about the skeleton at 2:58, not any if the other things
9:58 When I saw this I immediately looked at that set and said to myself: Please tell me I didn’t put it on upside down. I look at it and it’s upside down. Thank you bc I would of never known that. lolllllllll 🤣🤣🤣
The thumbnail does the trick! It's funny to see that LEGO makes these kind of mistakes. Keep up the good work!
2:14 to skip the raid
These are the people who give me faith in humanity
Smart
These are actually very funny, and the fact that some of these slip through cracks (ie that double layered technic plane set) is outrageous. In terms of using illegal build techniques i feel like lego speed champions triumphs this category of “unofficial official building techniques.”
I have a weird mistake for you. In the 2008-2009 set "the lost tomb" from Lego Indiana jones, it shows 2 torsos in the instructions (beloq and satipo) that don't appear in the set.
5:39 what was that
From what I can see, it’s just the box art again
I don’t see anything there 1000 comments of this I don’t see it
@@therumbler8868 its the box art
5:39
Interesting thing about the lamborgini error: the red axle is actually correct, its the grey technic beam it is supposed to go through that is too low. You can see it clipping through the black below on the right, additional you can see that the red yellow and red again all line up the same in both error and corrected.
That lego set at 3:02 was my first ever lego set, the nostalgia I get from seeing that is amazing.
12:11 You start talking over yourself! Even SpitBrix isn't immune to errors! 😂🙃🤪👍
I believe these instructions are created in CAD programs with shading turned off, which would explain the weird clipping in some instances.
Yeah, back when I was learning how to do assemblies in Solidworks (a common CAD program), we used a digital lego technic set to build something with, so I would absolutely believe they use a similar program for creating new bricks and designing the instructions.
However, with CAD assemblies, One problem with mates (the instruction that says “hey this piece should be inside of this piece or tangent to this other piece” etc, and the next time you try to add something or move something, its a clipping fest lol, especially in large assemblies. And that’s not even going into how your first draft of custom components meant to be assembled is never ever gonna fit quite right on the first pass (unless you have the graphics capability to build within an assembly smoothly, which my older computer doesn’t - it always stutters and glitches and makes things impossible to work around when I try more than a few simple edits to a part while its in assembly lol.)
You may have mentioned this one before but in 75312 Boba Fett’s Starship, there's a small error. In stage 147 you add 4 small parts, these are all removed in stage 154 then reappear in stage 155 (along with extra pieces on top of them)
The way you showed the sponsor was great!😆
@@SpitBrix but the game isn’t great.
That was probably the most creative plug for a sponsor
the model covering on top of the plane model is actually the combined model from the 2018 lego technic WHACK and BASH pull back sets
Just goes to show that no matter the year Lego still makes these mistakes, thus giving great content for fans to use in videos XD
4:12 The laptop itself is messed up, too. The arrow keys are on the left, which I have never seen on any laptop.
In the 8002 Destroyer Droid set, step 11 comes after step 9. Step 10 shows different. Found it while rebuilding :) .
If I remember correctly, at 4:16, the "armored vehicle" on top of the plane is actually set 42118 which had an alternate model you could make if you combined it with set 42119.
Edit: Correction, it was sets 42072 and 42073 :D
Ht
hold up, you could make an entirely new set if you combined 2 other sets?
that's a cool concept, although it of course costs more.
😂😂😂😂
Love that you have cap this series going. Love all the fand submissions. Lego really does connect people.
Hi. Today I noticed a mistake on the box "Harry Potter Hogwarts Astronomy Tower 75969. We can notice it from the front in a small window where we can see the whole building from the back, but we can notice it better from the back of the box. In the highest room where there is a telescope and a parchment with a constellation. The binoculars levitate, there should be the same blue piece under it as there is on the globe below. I will be happy if this error is in any video or short video. 😉🙂
00:40 these bricks are placed on top and below so 4 are needed
On the top of the box on set 60304 where it shows you can connect the set to others, it doesn't shade out all of set 60290 leaving it to look like a barricade from set 60290 is part of set 60304.
YOU ACTUALLY USED MY IDEAAAAAA LES GOO
When I saw my idea I was screaming for joy!! THANKS SO MUCH SPITBRIX! This is the most biggest and pivotal event that has taken place in my life. You made my day. 💙💙
🤓
The Ninjago 71755 Temple of the Endless Sea has a Mistake on the Box, on the left top at the horn of Vojira, but it‘s correct in the Instruction.
I hate how good that transition to the sponsor was
9:03 did this man just crack his knuckles?
No, it's the background music.
I found an error, well, not really. But REALLY confusing, at set 75309, step 364, the round'ish bricks need to be on top of the long plate. But it perfectly overlaps so it looks like the 1x4 part of the round'ish part is supposed to be on the long plate. I fixed this tho by looking at the step before this one, where you need to do this on the other side.
1:11 was jack for real playing raid
On that worm minifig he's shown with a medium stone grey hand on the box, but the minifig has a dark stone grey hand.
i'd love to see a set that uses alot of the different illegal building techniques some day
And it’s a Lego city one of a criminal base
I have the Lego set at 4:33 and they fixed the error
12:09 when a video about errors has an error in it:
spitbrix: you can clearly see that Jay is playing his favourite game, raid sh-
me: *spams skip button*
5:20 i got your nose :(
Hey! I have a really good one I found a while back.
In set number 7690 (the Mars Mission Eagle Command Base) the parts list for the set includes one extra of part number 30055, despite it not actually being used in the set whatsoever. I looked through the manual several times trying to find a step I missed but couldn’t. I may be wrong but I’m fairly certain it was never used.
there are usually a few extra peices that come in each set incase you lose a peice
@@pastasketti The piece isn’t used in the set whatsoever.
This is the only RAID sponsor I'll accept
Very clever way of switching the video to the sponsorship
0:54 that plug in was smooth
2:32
No, don’t worry.It’s just barrier blocks from Minecraft.
Interesting fact about the "joined pages" error:
At one point, all books were sold to customers that way. The market for paper knives was higher back then.
When I was a kid I used to think that people would hand draw all the instructions, and I would never throw them away. I still have a whole box full of instructions
Finally. Another episode! I found this channel a few days ago. Not really a huge Lego fan but I really like your content, and Love this series. Cheers!
have you noticed the mistake in Lego Ninjago Shuricopter?
On the box, the tail fin piece at the back at the helicopter is actually placed too far back, whereas in the instructions it tells you to place it 2 studs forwards, which looks much more correct.
skip the boring sponsor 2:14
that sponsor was very unexpected
Your having some instances errors as well when you were talking about the best lego season ever LOL 😂 ninjago
What happened here? 12:14
I know you were trying to show us how his voice overlapped but the time stamp you put is just after that
10:21 ima check my instructions book right away
I really like your videos! And have been wanting a part 5 for like, 8 months!
5:40
I do see that weird big black sussy stuff in the corner
8:44 bruh I was born on 2005
1:03 I hate sponsers
Fr
2:14 then
@@doubleWmemes?
*sponsors
That very first one, you can see the other 2 pieces right below those. But yeah, Lego saying you only need one was an error.
Literally the first set, you do in fact need 4 panels, 2 for each engine nacelle.
5:44 SUS MOMENT
its blow the brick separator
below*
That ad was a nice touch.
*skips ad about a literal pocket casino*
You jogged a memory for me. I had that cement mixer and I vividly remember being very confused at that particular step
2:20 That box clearly also has a misprint, interestingly on the chain!
7:33
Doctor Octavius: How did those bricks disappear?
Builder: lots of birthday parties
"this one's old, well if you consider 2005 a long time ago" guy just roasted his entire audience right there ☠️☠️
That was the smoothest transition into a sponsor. Usually i just skip them but i will allow it for this one.
ayo that sponsor segue was clean asf
This series is so fun love you spitbix
10:39 you can clearly see that it's not the axle that is clipping, but the whole grey double T shape where it's clipping through is rendered a bit too low in 3D space.
That reindeers just magic
Got the power to make studs disappear
Review Lego Mario.
My own story of “The Great Lego Mario Epidemic (I came up with the name)”: While Sega was busy with making Sonic into movies in 2020, Nintendo, having six years worth of money more than Sega, got an actual deal with Lego to make Lego Super Mario (in Walmarts, Targets, malls, and the Amazon website). With some cool fricking ideas, Lego Luigi from 2021, Lego Peach coming this August, having Lego Mario, Lego Luigi, and Lego Peach as electronic Lego figures that run on batteries, and a free app that replaces the manuals, I’d say Nintendo has outmatched Sega. The batteries are triple A.