@@cegesh1459 I get you, but if it's just an ocasional small red flag, it's fine, people didn't come to his content for that. The problem was when he started dressing all in red and it began becoming the content. It was supposed to be a metafor, but it does kinda align with when he started dressing in the red gambeson.
It's wild that he actually holds onto this argumentation so tightly. It's obviously not what anyone says. He's clinging so hard to his dead fish of a counterargument because he can't address anything that's actually on the table. He's given himself the absolute weakest platform and he's still incapable of doing anything with it. I also love that he wants to "celebrate traditional families" when he can't keep his together.
@@bongosmcdongos4190 I don't really have anything to expand other than what is known, he used to wear a wedding ring now he doesn't. But I used to watch Shad regularly years ago, he talked about being mormon and only meeting his wife a handful of time before they got married and had 5 kids.
"saying animals do it isn't a good argument, animals also do this, that, and that..." That's a horrible argument that ignores the initial focus of the conversation. Which is the claim "being gay isn't natural." Acknowledging animals can be gay isn't a claim made within a vacuum.
Again, I will repeat it: there is no homosexual gene. Homosexuality didn't exist since the very existence of humans, nor did same sex intercourses were viewed in the same concept of LGBTQ/homosexuality. Nor is it part of a physical evolution. Therefore it's a social construct and social animals outside of humans are capable of complex interactions and behaviors actually. Does it mean that understand what homosexuality is? Nope, just like Ancient Greece and Sumerians, they didn't know this concept even though some men and women engaged in said same sex relationships. Homosexuality is very much an esoterical social concept based off of same sex relationships. Big difference.
There is an evolutionary benefit to homosexuality, especially in species like lions, for instance. Prides with bonded males do better than prides with one male. Those male lions establish loving, lifelong bonds. They're eachother's ride or die lovers, when one dies, it's often catastrophic for their bonded partner. In humans; we historically would raise children in a more communal way in many pre-colonial societies. Queer family members who do not have kids would traditionally assist in raising children, or would be able to help their relatives by sharing with them, as they tended to have no/less children. And they provided optional families for children who may have lost both parents or are unwanted. That's why we have the saying 'it takes a village to raise a child'.
people are not ready to ask the question "who do people cheat?" If we're really meant to be in monogamous relationships, not advocating for breaking another person's trust, just saying, why do we do it in the first place?
I'll also add that species that engage in mate copying behaviour have higher rates of bisexuality as well. Iirc this was done on guppies who have mate copying behaviour (like humans supposedly do) and it was found that duller, damaged, and smaller male fish were selected for more often than brighter, healthier, and larger males, so long as they were seen mating. And the sex of who they mated with didn't matter. So male guppies making love to male or female guppies were selected for by other female guppies more often than the "sigma chad guppy". TL:DR in species where having a partner makes you more attractive, being with a male or female partner makes you more attractive. So being bisexual is a huge advantage.
The weird thing about evolution is that a trait is only successful if it can reproduce and be passed on to further generations. So while having more nurturing people in a community is absolutely helpful, it's not advantageous from a genetic stand point (unless they procreate). So while it's beneficial to the species as a whole, it's not at all be beneficial to the propagation of a "homosexuality gene". So the answer to "why do gay people exist" needs to be found beyond it having an evolutionary advantage. It's more likely that homosexuality just isn't genetic (or is only partially so), meaning it wouldn't be subjected to evolutionary pressures in the same way as genetically inheritable traits
@@GamingpandacatI think it's less that, and more that people choose to stay in relationships they're unhappy in, usually because of social stigmatization. I've had family members try to get me back with an ex who I openly told them was abusing me in every way when I got away. We didn't have kids nor were we married or engaged, but it took a year for my mom to stop trying to get us back together.
No shad, the framing comes from the right. They claim that homosexuality is a human creation and doesn’t exist in the animal kingdom. This documentary proves it’s just not the case.
The documentary is wrong since it's a consensus that there is no "homosexual" gene in our DNA, the documentary extrapolates that if two male animals or two female animals do stuff, then it applies to our perception of homosexuality even though said animals don't even understand the concept behind it. You can look everywhere as much as you want, you will never find the proof that there is an homosexual gene. Therefore, same sex relationships are the result of social influence and interactions, especially true for social animals and mammals in general. Outside of humans, other animals wouldn't even understand the concept our concept of homosexuality just like back in ancient times, let's say Ancient Greece, homosexuality didn't exist despite the fact that there were for instance two males doing things in bed. They were also expected to procreate. Hence why it's a modern social construct and influence. You cannot be born gay, whether it's us HSS, dolphins, other apes, elephants, felines, dogs, ants, bees whatever.
Some conservatives might make that claim, but even being shown that there are gay animals won't resolve the issue - because it's a moral question for them. They feel outrage and disgust about it. That's really hard to tackle, because these are their core values and really woven into their personality. I think to convince them of not being anti-gay would be as difficult as convincing someone to like a food that they don't like or appreciate music they are annoyed by. One would have to recognize that they feel this aversion and reflect on why and work on themselves to change it. But that requires a high level of empathy and capability to self-reflect.
I have a diploma in animal studies and hearing Shad's... arguments? ...believes? what ever you can call it, about animals and their behavior is just so painful to my brain. I now know how physicists feel when they meet flat earth believer
A mild special interest of mine is very roughly human evolution. Hearing people talk about the two genders and two sexes, about how men are made for this and women are made for that. All that shit? Depressing beyond belief.
Shad: "Critical thinking, understanding moral complexity, actually comprehending good and evil is what sets humans apart." Also Shad: is a Mormon Is Shad admitting that he isn't human?
mormons think critical thinking is when you stick your fingers in your ears and go "lalalala i can't hear youuuuu" anytime anyone brings up joseph smith's treasure stone or the mountain meadows massacre or how the cult tried to posthumously baptize the victims of the holocaust or how mormon leadership did the "i'm a mormon" campaign and then immediately turned 180 and started saying anyone who says "mormon" instead of "lds" is devil-influenced or literally any facts about history or reality source: i'm an ex-mormon
Lmao don't christians, and yes i am putting Mormons under that umbrella, believe that the biggest mistake humanity ever made was eating a fruit THAT MADE YOU COMPREHEND GOOD AND EVIL!?!?!
or they think it won't survive, many times when a mother rejects her offspring and human caretakers take over, it's later discovered that it had a congenital defect and had low survival expectations in the wild, and in some cases it had to be put down because it was too painful to let them live on and/or they would die a slow and painful dead, it's not like chudiverity is implying, that they particularly enjoy killing their young Also, this may be news for some people but not all animals have maternal instincts, and they don't recognize their young, they simply see "a small thing I can eat"
@@LaNoir. for what? some (I would say actually most) animals not having maternal instincts? or the part where some animal mothers somehow know that their young won't survive to adulthood and don't even waste time and energy raising them?
@@CRSB00 It's so freaking annoying seeing people repeat researchers word by word that never put in the effort to actually bond with an animal. It's like lumping together every human because there's no diversity at all to be found. Plot twist: humans are animals. We all are just different species sharing this planet, and within those different species you find different personalities. Working as an animal rescuer, I had to directly foster different species, and a lot of cases that would have been just killed off by standardised researchers are perfectly thriving. They say that hatchlings always have to crack their shell on their own or they are sick and won't make it anyways. We had an entire nest of duck eggs that would not have made it if we didn't crack their shells in time because they became too weak, the average of those 9 ducks became 8 years old, with the oldest hitting age 15. None of them had any health problems, they died of age or when a fox dug a hole into the run. Coming back to what you said, the rate of animals killing off their offspring is extremely low to begin with, and it's mostly out of stress (one factor being that they couldn't process what giving birth means, so much for "we made our pet pregnant to let it enjoy the delight of motherhood at least once" - they fcking don't care. They care when they're there, but they never asked for it). They have basic instincts but they are not super beings sniffing out cancer. In fact, there were documented cases where e.g. a mother cat would spend extraordinarily much time with their sick offspring and becoming heartbroken when it dies. The reason why a lot of baby rescued cases die is bad care, that they were away for too long from the warmth of their mother or that they could not build up their immune system due to lack of maternal lactose. Saying "most animals don't have maternal instincts" is the weirdest take I've ever heard, you basically say that animals lack the natural instinct of continuing their species - ???how did you come so far in life???
@@LaNoir. you're sooo incredibly closed minded that it even ocurred that most animals are not mamals, reptiles or birds, most animals are invertebates and most of their matenal inctincts only go so far as to "look for safe place to lay eggs, lay eggs and done" Also all ypu gave is anecdotal information and yess, I agree thya all animals have thir own unique persanilties and quirks knce you get to know them but my whole point was to counter Chudiversity's stupid claim of "some animals kill their offspring ergo homosexuality is wrong" with the implication that they do it for shits and giggles, I have never known of predatora actually enjoy killing thier prey, save for the more inteligent ones, ironically, like dolphins, chimps and us.
The species with the highest percentage of observed homosexuality are: Dolphins, giraffes, penguins, lions, sheep, elephants, albatrosses, black swans, macaques, bison, orcas, and bonobos. Bonobos, being mostly bisexual.
Lions are particularly interesting. Male lions can hold multiple different prides, and female lions don't only mate with the dominant male who they're supposed to have cubs with. Lionesses only want to mate when they're ready to conceive, it's the male lions who bond together the hardest and mate together the most. A coalition of 2 or more feline boyfriends will often ride and die for one another, and when one passes, his mate (in both senses of the word), is often not far behind. Working together, they have much better chances of winning and holding onto a pride long enough for their cubs to become adults.
for real, like trans rights are still a hotly debated topic and many people are still on the fence on a lot of things so people can get away with being transphobic a lot easier for now, but gay people at this point in most developed countries are largely accepted by the majority so being an open homophobe will obviously alienate a lot of people right off the bat
Well they basically want to fight, or hump anything during their breeding season. That's not so much gay, as willing to hump anything which will stay still long enough. They also run face-first into each other at that time, and will charge random inanimate objects. So it's more, they are dosed to the eyeballs with hormones.
Also most female Koalas and some Lions. I LOVE how conservatives use the Lion as a symbol of purified, traditional masculinity when most male Lion coalitions are part-time butt-buddies. 😜
And social animals at that. But we have created various complex social interactions which don't necessarily compare to other animals. It's not because an animal has same sex relationships just like another species that it's homosexualtiy in both cases. Both animals will have a different perception or understanding of it.
@@RonJeremy514 Right. Like how Bonobo and Chimpanzee societies differ in their approach to conflict resolution. Chimpanzees will wage actual war on a neighboring clan, wiping them all out. What do Bonobos do to resolve conflict? Make love! We're not the only species that screws for pleasure, but we are the only one that judges each other for enjoying it differently than ourselves based on our own theo-delusions. That's both arrogant and insane when you think about it.
17:52 - Same reason 20% of human embryos get flushed out of the uterus and end up as a microscopic stain on the woman's panties, I would bet. The evolutionary meta for a lot of larger mammals (IE, not small mice) is to prioritize the survival of the mother over that of the offspring. This is present throughout the actual process of pregnancy - human bodies, at least, can be astonishingly quick to pull the plug on a pregnancy if the mother is subjected to stress, nutrient deficiencies, injury, etc. (Look up 'fetal absorption' to get an example.) Before I get into my original speculation, I'll also point out that pigs, to my understanding, can end up stark raving mad from being raised for food, because they're smart enough to figure out what's going to happen to them. That added stress could easily prompt abnormal, disquieting behavior from the pigs, especially in the hormonal aftermath of pregnancy & birth. That aside... I'm not a zoologist, but I could see these behaviors as an extension of that meta: animals are wired to prioritize their own survival while the babies are too young to fend for themselves, because the animals of the past which _didn't_ ended up having their entire litter get wiped if the mothers prioritized making sure all of them survived, even at the cost of their own wellbeing. There's a tension between maximizing offspring and reducing the number of mouths in need of feeding. "They're just filthy beasts" is about as boneheaded of a take as I'd expect from a Mormon dullard like Shad.
Specifically it's the split gill, or Schizophyllum commune. It's a pretty common mushroom in North America, and you can often find it growing on logs. The mushroom is also safely edible.
This is honestly my biggest pet peeve, humans are animals, i dont care what anyone thinks the "difference between us and animals" is a thing, and then put chimps and birds into a set (animals) saying they are more alike then humans are to either one is just dumb. Just is.
Reading back over that I realise I made a critical error in sentence formation and I don't know how to fix it so I hope you all understand what I meant 😅
I missed the timestamp, but I really want to address the "of the homosexual penguins - who lays the eggs" question. They adopt orphaned eggs. Just like gay swans do. And potentially many other species. Like bad things can happen to parents before eggs hatch. And having a pool of individuals who can take care of orphaned offsprings actually sounds like an evolutionary advantage for the species. And permitting gay couples is a solid way to have such individuals ready to take over care of orphans.
💀 I just watch so little of his stuff I never picked up on it. Same with metatron. I look up their vids on this or that topic and I don’t care for the rest. I really wish I could say I’m surprised my fellow military history nerds pay no attention to any other aspect of this species’ past
Homosexuality is very much natural, wearing clothes and glasses aren't. Also yeah these two doesn't have any on screen chemistry. I couldn't watch this kind of content by itself. Its all just whiny...
One thing to address is one of the first times homosexuality was documented in nature was the social pairing of lesbian seagulls, rather than only seeing two gay animals having sex. Saying its a "sexual deviancy" in animals is still fundamentally incorrect.
99.999% of bees were never supposed to reproduce, they do other cool stuff. they are the most successful and beloved animal on Earth, it's been speculated most terrestrial life would die without them. Biology bros should just wait and let the gays cook.
Anthropologist and biologist here. We've observed "homosexuality" in hundreds of species, including invertebrates. Especially invertebrates, in fact. We've known this for decades and the list has only grown. Humans are the only organism that punishes homosexuality. So, his confusion, however stupid, is unfortunately expected.
I don't just go "I'm straight and married..." So he *never* casually mentions his wife, from which it's obvious he's straight and married? Apparently Shad is an animal psychic and can read their minds to know they don't feel sexual attraction to a same-sex mate?
You know it’s so baffles me that Chad on his primary channel used to be all about like hey just because we have disagreements doesn’t mean we can’t be civil doesn’t mean we can’t get along doesn’t mean we can’t be polite with each other. He was always big saying that you know live and let live because he doesn’t agree with certain things as mean that he’s against peoples right to do it if you’re not hurting anybody, but then as soon as he got his four buddies involved, he just spiral hard and now he’s hanging out with Benjamin and the arch and it’s just sad. Also, what happened to his wedding ring? Voice to text so hopefully not all gibberish
I stg this dude got criticized *ONE TIME* by a women who knew more about women’s clothing in the Middle Ages than him a few years ago and it sent him down a *DARK* path…
We don't say it's okay because animals do it. We say animals and humans do it so it's natural. Of course, it's then funny when the theists complaining then turn around and say murder or abusing children is okay because the Bible or Quran does it.
Not out of a difference in beliefs (he was very insistent he was still friends with Shad and everything) but because the cost of living literally got too high for him to stay so he had to drop to move somewhere that was affordable. So, eh, I wouldn't bring Nathan quitting shadiversity as much of a good point. It's a lose/lose
@@neoqwerty We don't know if Nathan's stated reasons for leaving the squad are actually the truth. Maybe it was just a facade so as to not antagonize Shad too much, since we know he very easily gets upset.
While I miss living in a world where I didn't know every bigot's dumbass opinion, at least nowadays I can pretty quickly suss out who to block. Hate that a lot of people I used to like are bastards, but thems the breaks.
Most people are bastards in at least one dimension. Not many people pursue personal growth in all areas of their life honestly, they take shortcuts and get into mental loops and make allowances for evil instrumentally in order to feel successful and happy.
I am a sword lesbian. I cannot stress enough that i learned so much from him in regards to medieval weapons, and armor. And i absolutely love learning about how everyday people lived in the medieval world. Knowing that this guy doesnt support my fundamental person and all of my fellow lgbtq people is really saddening. On a positive note there is a group of people dedicated to learning and putting into practice different cultures and time periods in the medieval times. The SCA Society of Creative Anachronism. An incredibly diverse and accepting group of people and oh yeah love gay people.
Wolves have wars fairly often. Mostly to stop an enemy pack from trying to claim their territory. You can actually mark the boundaries between the territories of different packs from the corpses you find from skirmishes at the borders.
I am 25 minutes in, Shad has yet to make it past the intro. Damn. When you get this bamboozled over a couple quick action shots of animals before an announcer even opens their mouth, you probably are not mature enough for hte conversation.
Shadiversity: I'm totally not bigoted and will make no judgements against a person for being gay. Unless they suggest equivalency. If they suggest they are my equal I will pitch a fit.
I'm at the start of the video so it might come up later but wasn't there some kind of study or research that showed that animal researchers didn't even bother reporting on gay animal activities a majority of the time? So it's likely way more common and widespread amongst animals than we even realise.
@@StormCrownSr Well the point of observing animals in a scientific context is to make records of them and their behaviours etc. If this is new information about a species then it should ideally be properly recorded and shared with the world just like any other new information.
Well this made me unsubscribe from Shadiversity. I hadn't watched any of his videos in a while anyway, but as a pansexual trans girl I now realize I wouldn't be welcome on his channel anyway.
It's hard for me to explain how this feels from the perspective of an ex-fan of his. It's like Peter Parker seeing how Tony Stark becomes an absolute asshole during the Civil War comic run.
Dolphins definitely know what they doing. We give them way too much credit bc we think we're better than everything else. The Dolphins are smarter than us fam. We can't cut them slack
@nondescriptcat5620 ig it would be difficult for something without meaningful ways of communicating to complete an iq test against something else dedicated to proving they dont have internal experience....
It was said in the chat but the reason that mushrooms were part of the intro to the documentary was likely because fungi can have _tens of thousands_ of distinct sexes within the same species, absolutely wild.
@@animalxINSTINCT89 nah seahorses had reversed sexual reproduction. Clownfish have natural sex changes due to simple biological functions (same with frogs)
No, that would be the whiptail lizard, which is an all female species that reproduces through parthenogenesis, which still involves a courtship ritual between couples.
Fun fact: Most female foxes are strictly homosexual, and nearly all male foxes are bisexual. But they still somehow manage to have enough hetero sex to keep the species going, and they're fine, they're doin great. As long as we don't hunt them, they're doin great. Theyre just out there, in the woods and in the prairies, runnin and hoppin and rollin around, huntin mice and shit, playin, makin their goofy lil fox noises, they're great. They're just out there, vibin, like we should be.
When I clicked on this video, there were a number of directions I thought this could go. “We paved over paradise and put up a parking lot” was not one I anticipated.
The tragic and hilarious thing about that, to me, is that most bigoted people wouldn't have or intentionally cause a problem with an actual queer person as much as the idea of one they've made up in their heads thanks to constant propagandizing they've been exposed to and choose to continue to inundate themselves in.
Wait... Isn't this that guy who does weapon play larping and crap? He doesn't know crap about what hes talking about firstly. But secondly this is one of the biggest letdowns I have had in a while. He was one of my all time favorite RUclipsrs I had no idea he was like this. I am gay its great to know one of my favorite RUclipsrs think's I shouldn't exist because animals that are gay exist? WTF is going on. This is really disappointing. It actually hurts hearing this after knowing him for this many years. What like a decade at this point? A third of my life. This is really rough for me.
I hate finding out someone I liked was a bigot. The biggest one for me was probably JK Rowling, being a harry potter fan through childhood and my teenage years- and then realizing I was trans right about when she started openly, publicly despising us.
24:20 "I dont make being straight my identity" one of the lesser reasons i stopped watching shad years ago was because he would bring in his identity as a Traditional Married Mormon Male in every video
I literally learned about gay animals in psychology in 2019 or 2020. I think the college textbooks weren't brand new, so maybe they were printed between 2014 or 2017. I just remember that they were a few years old when we used them.
One of the things that really gets me when talking to right wingers is how they have no memory. I grew up very christian in a very christian area. Being gay being "unnatural" was one of the biggest arguments, and pointing to it not happening in animals was the biggest piece of evidence. The second something they said is proven wrong they just act like it was never said and doesn't matter.
Man, couldn't he just settle with complaining about nunchucks' effectiveness as weapons? Like seriously this is such a disaponitment, last time i heard about him was like a year ago or more when he was looking at the possibility of making a carbon fiber sword
No fucking way. i knew he was kind of pretentious about his religious channel, but i never bothered even looking at it but *this is ridiculous on the face off it*
Shad would vote for a law that defines human as having xx or xy without checking if he is xyy, then be surprised when his assets are ceased because only humans can own property.
5:26 came at this from the wrong angle imo, since there have been studies demonstrating profound intelligence, memory, self-recognition, language etc in dolphins. The reason evil is (ostensibly) unique to humanity is not only because humanity (ostensibly) acts above instinct, but because it was humanity that first conceived of morality and immorality. In the Garden of Eden Eve and Adam ate the fruit of "the knowledge of good and evil"; I think that part of the story reflects the development of moral systems by humans, it is the contradiction of a moral code applied to immoral actions that "creates" evil in the first place.
Skim milk left. He made a whole video about starting his own channel and needing to get a new job. He didn't even get asend-offf video like the bald sword dude did. I wonder if Fluffyy is next to go. Obviously miracle whip (manos) isn't going anywhere because they are both so hateful and play off each other.
It’s always so funny with the whole “*they* are doing this” argument, like who are “they” and what do they think “they” are doing to “make” animals gay? Do they genuinely believe Alex Jones’ whole “they’re putting chemicals in the water to make the frickin frogs gay” stuff? Are we stuck in fuckin 2016 💀😂😂
He was a lot cooler when he was just a dude LARPing swinging a stick in his backyard designing castles. Then he started saying his opinions.
Well he said some mormon stuff early-ish on, but most ignored it. Was a red flagg to me.
@@cegesh1459 I get you, but if it's just an ocasional small red flag, it's fine, people didn't come to his content for that. The problem was when he started dressing all in red and it began becoming the content.
It was supposed to be a metafor, but it does kinda align with when he started dressing in the red gambeson.
Reminds me of Elon, everyone loved him and thought he was amazing and then he opened his mouth.
Yeah, the thing that got me to stop listening to him was his stupid takes on Star Wars.
And it's funnier because he's like... almost 10.years behind the curve on monetizing this/his talking points.
"Homosexuality is bad because its unnatural!!!!!!!"
"Actual its very common in nature"
"OH BECAUSE ANIMALS DO IT ITS OKAY??????"
It's wild that he actually holds onto this argumentation so tightly. It's obviously not what anyone says. He's clinging so hard to his dead fish of a counterargument because he can't address anything that's actually on the table. He's given himself the absolute weakest platform and he's still incapable of doing anything with it. I also love that he wants to "celebrate traditional families" when he can't keep his together.
@@solomonverrico
Could anyone expect better than misinterpretation and strawman?
@@solomonverricoThere's some family drama in Shad's life??? Spill, pleeeaase!
🤡👆@Steve_T1990
Is this double-think, or just moving the goalposts?
I liked when Shag said humans are capable of "complex morality" and then said "understanding 'good' and 'evil'" aka the least complex morality.
Legitimately, black and white is the absolute simplest understand of things. Yes/No, 0 and 1, it's as far from complex as you can get
LOOKS LIKE CRINGE'S BACK ON THE MENU, BOYS!
In my gayest hostess with the mostess voice: I'll light the beacon, big boy.
A veritable buffet of cringe
Cringe is always on the menu when it's shad.
CAN’T TAKE HIS DRAAAAAUUUUUGHT‼️🧌
did you know an accusation of cannibalism is what started that fight in the books? crazy
Why doesn't he worry about his own failed arranged Mormon marriage before he tells us how to run ours?
It's not failed, he successfully managed to transform her into an underaged ai sexbot
Care to expand on that? Hadn't heard anything about it yet
What happened? Please spill the beans.
I want details on that, too.
@@bongosmcdongos4190 I don't really have anything to expand other than what is known, he used to wear a wedding ring now he doesn't. But I used to watch Shad regularly years ago, he talked about being mormon and only meeting his wife a handful of time before they got married and had 5 kids.
"saying animals do it isn't a good argument, animals also do this, that, and that..."
That's a horrible argument that ignores the initial focus of the conversation. Which is the claim "being gay isn't natural." Acknowledging animals can be gay isn't a claim made within a vacuum.
Yeah its called moving the goalpost, sneaky little technique
They say it's unnatural and when we rightfully show it is natural, they say we're using the appeal to nature fallacy. Sure buddy.
Again, I will repeat it: there is no homosexual gene. Homosexuality didn't exist since the very existence of humans, nor did same sex intercourses were viewed in the same concept of LGBTQ/homosexuality. Nor is it part of a physical evolution. Therefore it's a social construct and social animals outside of humans are capable of complex interactions and behaviors actually. Does it mean that understand what homosexuality is? Nope, just like Ancient Greece and Sumerians, they didn't know this concept even though some men and women engaged in said same sex relationships. Homosexuality is very much an esoterical social concept based off of same sex relationships. Big difference.
and im willing to bet that he uses the "lions eat meat, therefore i should eat meat" when debating a vegan
Not to mention we are animals
Can't spell Shadiversity without DIVERSITY.
He became what he feared the most.
RIGHT? The irony!
Lets be real the most diverse thing about Shad is the boxershorts line on his dadbod where he’s somehow whiter.
Ha, gortem
Funny enough that’s what first attracted me to the channel. Oooh big sword? Big castle? Diversity? HELL YEAH
Shag said "Infanticide is wrong". I wonder what his take is on Gaza.
“Israel has the right to defend itself” obviously
Or the @#*&^%ing BIBLE.
I mean, he's a Mormon. Who as we all know are notoriously principled "child-protectors"....🫠
@@markharrison6498 blame the CIA 🥱
@@markharrison6498had the roight*
Remember when Shad just did videos about swords and medieval weapons and stuff? Good times.
Wish we could turn back time
Actually looking back, it wasn't better, his lies and ideology was just hidden better, yet weaved into everything
Shad’s entire output has just been him dumping his resentment towards his much smarter, nicer, more successful brother onto the internet
There is an evolutionary benefit to homosexuality, especially in species like lions, for instance. Prides with bonded males do better than prides with one male. Those male lions establish loving, lifelong bonds. They're eachother's ride or die lovers, when one dies, it's often catastrophic for their bonded partner.
In humans; we historically would raise children in a more communal way in many pre-colonial societies. Queer family members who do not have kids would traditionally assist in raising children, or would be able to help their relatives by sharing with them, as they tended to have no/less children.
And they provided optional families for children who may have lost both parents or are unwanted.
That's why we have the saying 'it takes a village to raise a child'.
Came here to say the same thing, only you did in fewer words.
people are not ready to ask the question "who do people cheat?" If we're really meant to be in monogamous relationships, not advocating for breaking another person's trust, just saying, why do we do it in the first place?
I'll also add that species that engage in mate copying behaviour have higher rates of bisexuality as well. Iirc this was done on guppies who have mate copying behaviour (like humans supposedly do) and it was found that duller, damaged, and smaller male fish were selected for more often than brighter, healthier, and larger males, so long as they were seen mating. And the sex of who they mated with didn't matter. So male guppies making love to male or female guppies were selected for by other female guppies more often than the "sigma chad guppy".
TL:DR in species where having a partner makes you more attractive, being with a male or female partner makes you more attractive. So being bisexual is a huge advantage.
The weird thing about evolution is that a trait is only successful if it can reproduce and be passed on to further generations. So while having more nurturing people in a community is absolutely helpful, it's not advantageous from a genetic stand point (unless they procreate). So while it's beneficial to the species as a whole, it's not at all be beneficial to the propagation of a "homosexuality gene". So the answer to "why do gay people exist" needs to be found beyond it having an evolutionary advantage. It's more likely that homosexuality just isn't genetic (or is only partially so), meaning it wouldn't be subjected to evolutionary pressures in the same way as genetically inheritable traits
@@GamingpandacatI think it's less that, and more that people choose to stay in relationships they're unhappy in, usually because of social stigmatization. I've had family members try to get me back with an ex who I openly told them was abusing me in every way when I got away. We didn't have kids nor were we married or engaged, but it took a year for my mom to stop trying to get us back together.
No shad, the framing comes from the right. They claim that homosexuality is a human creation and doesn’t exist in the animal kingdom. This documentary proves it’s just not the case.
Humans are animals ans apart of the animal kingdom.
The documentary is wrong since it's a consensus that there is no "homosexual" gene in our DNA, the documentary extrapolates that if two male animals or two female animals do stuff, then it applies to our perception of homosexuality even though said animals don't even understand the concept behind it. You can look everywhere as much as you want, you will never find the proof that there is an homosexual gene. Therefore, same sex relationships are the result of social influence and interactions, especially true for social animals and mammals in general. Outside of humans, other animals wouldn't even understand the concept our concept of homosexuality just like back in ancient times, let's say Ancient Greece, homosexuality didn't exist despite the fact that there were for instance two males doing things in bed. They were also expected to procreate. Hence why it's a modern social construct and influence. You cannot be born gay, whether it's us HSS, dolphins, other apes, elephants, felines, dogs, ants, bees whatever.
@@aarons6935 Try and tell a conservative that 😂
Some conservatives might make that claim, but even being shown that there are gay animals won't resolve the issue - because it's a moral question for them. They feel outrage and disgust about it. That's really hard to tackle, because these are their core values and really woven into their personality. I think to convince them of not being anti-gay would be as difficult as convincing someone to like a food that they don't like or appreciate music they are annoyed by.
One would have to recognize that they feel this aversion and reflect on why and work on themselves to change it. But that requires a high level of empathy and capability to self-reflect.
I have a diploma in animal studies and hearing Shad's... arguments? ...believes? what ever you can call it, about animals and their behavior is just so painful to my brain. I now know how physicists feel when they meet flat earth believer
A mild special interest of mine is very roughly human evolution. Hearing people talk about the two genders and two sexes, about how men are made for this and women are made for that. All that shit? Depressing beyond belief.
@@beans1557 That too! And they always use "it's basic biology" argument, as if biology ended after 4th grade
@@Aliens420
Exactly 😭 like having the most basic understanding of biology is some brag
Shad: "Critical thinking, understanding moral complexity, actually comprehending good and evil is what sets humans apart."
Also Shad: is a Mormon
Is Shad admitting that he isn't human?
mormons think critical thinking is when you stick your fingers in your ears and go "lalalala i can't hear youuuuu" anytime anyone brings up joseph smith's treasure stone or the mountain meadows massacre or how the cult tried to posthumously baptize the victims of the holocaust or how mormon leadership did the "i'm a mormon" campaign and then immediately turned 180 and started saying anyone who says "mormon" instead of "lds" is devil-influenced or literally any facts about history or reality
source: i'm an ex-mormon
Lmao don't christians, and yes i am putting Mormons under that umbrella, believe that the biggest mistake humanity ever made was eating a fruit THAT MADE YOU COMPREHEND GOOD AND EVIL!?!?!
Conservatives aren't people until they drop their hateful ways.
A moron, you say?
When animals eat their young it’s either because the offspring is suffering and going to die or they are starving.
or they think it won't survive, many times when a mother rejects her offspring and human caretakers take over, it's later discovered that it had a congenital defect and had low survival expectations in the wild, and in some cases it had to be put down because it was too painful to let them live on and/or they would die a slow and painful dead, it's not like chudiverity is implying, that they particularly enjoy killing their young
Also, this may be news for some people but not all animals have maternal instincts, and they don't recognize their young, they simply see "a small thing I can eat"
@@CRSB00 source?
@@LaNoir. for what? some (I would say actually most) animals not having maternal instincts? or the part where some animal mothers somehow know that their young won't survive to adulthood and don't even waste time and energy raising them?
@@CRSB00 It's so freaking annoying seeing people repeat researchers word by word that never put in the effort to actually bond with an animal. It's like lumping together every human because there's no diversity at all to be found. Plot twist: humans are animals. We all are just different species sharing this planet, and within those different species you find different personalities.
Working as an animal rescuer, I had to directly foster different species, and a lot of cases that would have been just killed off by standardised researchers are perfectly thriving. They say that hatchlings always have to crack their shell on their own or they are sick and won't make it anyways. We had an entire nest of duck eggs that would not have made it if we didn't crack their shells in time because they became too weak, the average of those 9 ducks became 8 years old, with the oldest hitting age 15. None of them had any health problems, they died of age or when a fox dug a hole into the run.
Coming back to what you said, the rate of animals killing off their offspring is extremely low to begin with, and it's mostly out of stress (one factor being that they couldn't process what giving birth means, so much for "we made our pet pregnant to let it enjoy the delight of motherhood at least once" - they fcking don't care. They care when they're there, but they never asked for it). They have basic instincts but they are not super beings sniffing out cancer. In fact, there were documented cases where e.g. a mother cat would spend extraordinarily much time with their sick offspring and becoming heartbroken when it dies.
The reason why a lot of baby rescued cases die is bad care, that they were away for too long from the warmth of their mother or that they could not build up their immune system due to lack of maternal lactose.
Saying "most animals don't have maternal instincts" is the weirdest take I've ever heard, you basically say that animals lack the natural instinct of continuing their species - ???how did you come so far in life???
@@LaNoir. you're sooo incredibly closed minded that it even ocurred that most animals are not mamals, reptiles or birds, most animals are invertebates and most of their matenal inctincts only go so far as to "look for safe place to lay eggs, lay eggs and done"
Also all ypu gave is anecdotal information and yess, I agree thya all animals have thir own unique persanilties and quirks knce you get to know them but my whole point was to counter Chudiversity's stupid claim of "some animals kill their offspring ergo homosexuality is wrong" with the implication that they do it for shits and giggles, I have never known of predatora actually enjoy killing thier prey, save for the more inteligent ones, ironically, like dolphins, chimps and us.
The species with the highest percentage of observed homosexuality are: Dolphins, giraffes, penguins, lions, sheep, elephants, albatrosses, black swans, macaques, bison, orcas, and bonobos.
Bonobos, being mostly bisexual.
Lions are particularly interesting. Male lions can hold multiple different prides, and female lions don't only mate with the dominant male who they're supposed to have cubs with. Lionesses only want to mate when they're ready to conceive, it's the male lions who bond together the hardest and mate together the most. A coalition of 2 or more feline boyfriends will often ride and die for one another, and when one passes, his mate (in both senses of the word), is often not far behind. Working together, they have much better chances of winning and holding onto a pride long enough for their cubs to become adults.
Also, many fish and amphibians can change sex at will.
Many reptiles can reproduce without males.
There are species of geckos that are only females.
Bonobos alongside chimps are also our closest relatives too…
The lesbian lizards left out again
I'm sorry reality isn't how you want it mr shartiversity
*posts openly homophobic content*
"Why is everyone so mean to me now? Why aren't ppl watching my videos anymore?"
Not to mention the other things he did which just ties it all together that shad is a horrible person
for real, like trans rights are still a hotly debated topic and many people are still on the fence on a lot of things so people can get away with being transphobic a lot easier for now, but gay people at this point in most developed countries are largely accepted by the majority so being an open homophobe will obviously alienate a lot of people right off the bat
Don't let Shad know that basically the whole taxonomic family Bovidae is hella gay
Well they basically want to fight, or hump anything during their breeding season. That's not so much gay, as willing to hump anything which will stay still long enough. They also run face-first into each other at that time, and will charge random inanimate objects. So it's more, they are dosed to the eyeballs with hormones.
Also most female Koalas and some Lions.
I LOVE how conservatives use the Lion as a symbol of purified, traditional masculinity when most male Lion coalitions are part-time butt-buddies. 😜
And that bonobos like, exist.
You... you had "Bovigae" right there. And you didn't take the it? Shame. Shaaaame on the house of no_Pitty. Shame.
not to mention homo sapiens are animals also.......
Exactly. Homosexuality can't be unnatural because humans are part of nature.
And social animals at that. But we have created various complex social interactions which don't necessarily compare to other animals. It's not because an animal has same sex relationships just like another species that it's homosexualtiy in both cases. Both animals will have a different perception or understanding of it.
@@RonJeremy514 In actual fact homosexuality seems more common in social species like lions, bats and of course the most social of, species humans.
@@RonJeremy514 Right. Like how Bonobo and Chimpanzee societies differ in their approach to conflict resolution. Chimpanzees will wage actual war on a neighboring clan, wiping them all out. What do Bonobos do to resolve conflict? Make love!
We're not the only species that screws for pleasure, but we are the only one that judges each other for enjoying it differently than ourselves based on our own theo-delusions. That's both arrogant and insane when you think about it.
NoOOooOOOO GAHD MADE US IN HIS IMAGE ADHDOCJDJSHXHS
It will probably take the human race *thousands* of years to fully recover from sex-negativity.
or a revolution
@@kuroudo5481 The sexiest of revolutions.
17:52 - Same reason 20% of human embryos get flushed out of the uterus and end up as a microscopic stain on the woman's panties, I would bet.
The evolutionary meta for a lot of larger mammals (IE, not small mice) is to prioritize the survival of the mother over that of the offspring. This is present throughout the actual process of pregnancy - human bodies, at least, can be astonishingly quick to pull the plug on a pregnancy if the mother is subjected to stress, nutrient deficiencies, injury, etc. (Look up 'fetal absorption' to get an example.)
Before I get into my original speculation, I'll also point out that pigs, to my understanding, can end up stark raving mad from being raised for food, because they're smart enough to figure out what's going to happen to them. That added stress could easily prompt abnormal, disquieting behavior from the pigs, especially in the hormonal aftermath of pregnancy & birth.
That aside...
I'm not a zoologist, but I could see these behaviors as an extension of that meta: animals are wired to prioritize their own survival while the babies are too young to fend for themselves, because the animals of the past which _didn't_ ended up having their entire litter get wiped if the mothers prioritized making sure all of them survived, even at the cost of their own wellbeing. There's a tension between maximizing offspring and reducing the number of mouths in need of feeding. "They're just filthy beasts" is about as boneheaded of a take as I'd expect from a Mormon dullard like Shad.
How often does he say its unnatural or evil.. the fact that animals do it..definitionally makes it natural and not evil.
Apparently mushrooms have 23'000 sexes.
Depends on the species, but yes, mushroom s*x is freaky
Specifically it's the split gill, or Schizophyllum commune. It's a pretty common mushroom in North America, and you can often find it growing on logs. The mushroom is also safely edible.
That's so many positions!
Damn I don't even have 1
Goddamn. Imagine if we had more than the two and a half?
This is honestly my biggest pet peeve, humans are animals, i dont care what anyone thinks the "difference between us and animals" is a thing, and then put chimps and birds into a set (animals) saying they are more alike then humans are to either one is just dumb. Just is.
Human exceptionalism is a bitch, isn't it?
Reading back over that I realise I made a critical error in sentence formation and I don't know how to fix it so I hope you all understand what I meant 😅
Yeah, but speciesism is a hell of a brain rot.
@@hilliard665 you came through fine 👍
A dumb animal is more alike any other dumb animal than it is to a human
I missed the timestamp, but I really want to address the "of the homosexual penguins - who lays the eggs" question.
They adopt orphaned eggs. Just like gay swans do. And potentially many other species.
Like bad things can happen to parents before eggs hatch. And having a pool of individuals who can take care of orphaned offsprings actually sounds like an evolutionary advantage for the species. And permitting gay couples is a solid way to have such individuals ready to take over care of orphans.
Homophobes are so fucking stupid, dude.
Evolution isn't about you surving it's about good genes surving, if your 3rd son is gay he is protecting your genes via your other kids.
I stopped watcheng Shad years ago because of the misogyny. Figures he's also a queerphobe. 🙄
💀 I just watch so little of his stuff I never picked up on it. Same with metatron. I look up their vids on this or that topic and I don’t care for the rest. I really wish I could say I’m surprised my fellow military history nerds pay no attention to any other aspect of this species’ past
-points at Shad- This guy doesn't even know about mushroom genders
Can't believe skimmed milk left, I'm gonna miss his vacant, life-choice questioning thousand yard gaze as Shad goes off on one :(
Homosexuality is very much natural, wearing clothes and glasses aren't.
Also yeah these two doesn't have any on screen chemistry. I couldn't watch this kind of content by itself. Its all just whiny...
One thing to address is one of the first times homosexuality was documented in nature was the social pairing of lesbian seagulls, rather than only seeing two gay animals having sex. Saying its a "sexual deviancy" in animals is still fundamentally incorrect.
“The animals aren’t legitimately gay”
Say that to the gay peacock couple at my local park. About a half dozen female’s in the same park and yet🤷
Shad is evolving backward ever since he became an AI Art Bros.
99.999% of bees were never supposed to reproduce, they do other cool stuff.
they are the most successful and beloved animal on Earth, it's been speculated most terrestrial life would die without them.
Biology bros should just wait and let the gays cook.
Well that's why in every critical or extremely complex IT job there is always a gay furry running the show
Anthropologist and biologist here.
We've observed "homosexuality" in hundreds of species, including invertebrates. Especially invertebrates, in fact. We've known this for decades and the list has only grown. Humans are the only organism that punishes homosexuality. So, his confusion, however stupid, is unfortunately expected.
I don't just go "I'm straight and married..." So he *never* casually mentions his wife, from which it's obvious he's straight and married?
Apparently Shad is an animal psychic and can read their minds to know they don't feel sexual attraction to a same-sex mate?
You know it’s so baffles me that Chad on his primary channel used to be all about like hey just because we have disagreements doesn’t mean we can’t be civil doesn’t mean we can’t get along doesn’t mean we can’t be polite with each other. He was always big saying that you know live and let live because he doesn’t agree with certain things as mean that he’s against peoples right to do it if you’re not hurting anybody, but then as soon as he got his four buddies involved, he just spiral hard and now he’s hanging out with Benjamin and the arch and it’s just sad. Also, what happened to his wedding ring? Voice to text so hopefully not all gibberish
Humans are animals, that is all. Furthermore, happy mens health month.
I stg this dude got criticized *ONE TIME* by a women who knew more about women’s clothing in the Middle Ages than him a few years ago and it sent him down a *DARK* path…
We don't say it's okay because animals do it.
We say animals and humans do it so it's natural.
Of course, it's then funny when the theists complaining then turn around and say murder or abusing children is okay because the Bible or Quran does it.
I can't remember who is who, but the other dude (Nathan) quit shadiversity
Not out of a difference in beliefs (he was very insistent he was still friends with Shad and everything) but because the cost of living literally got too high for him to stay so he had to drop to move somewhere that was affordable.
So, eh, I wouldn't bring Nathan quitting shadiversity as much of a good point. It's a lose/lose
@@neoqwerty We don't know if Nathan's stated reasons for leaving the squad are actually the truth. Maybe it was just a facade so as to not antagonize Shad too much, since we know he very easily gets upset.
@@neoqwerty I wonder what his position is on decommodified housing 🤔
While I miss living in a world where I didn't know every bigot's dumbass opinion, at least nowadays I can pretty quickly suss out who to block. Hate that a lot of people I used to like are bastards, but thems the breaks.
Most people are bastards in at least one dimension. Not many people pursue personal growth in all areas of their life honestly, they take shortcuts and get into mental loops and make allowances for evil instrumentally in order to feel successful and happy.
I am a sword lesbian. I cannot stress enough that i learned so much from him in regards to medieval weapons, and armor. And i absolutely love learning about how everyday people lived in the medieval world. Knowing that this guy doesnt support my fundamental person and all of my fellow lgbtq people is really saddening.
On a positive note there is a group of people dedicated to learning and putting into practice different cultures and time periods in the medieval times. The SCA Society of Creative Anachronism. An incredibly diverse and accepting group of people and oh yeah love gay people.
Don't know too many animal species that engage in war with each other like humans do.
Love watching ant colonies fight in the backyard though
ants legit have a active world war atm
Wolves have wars fairly often. Mostly to stop an enemy pack from trying to claim their territory. You can actually mark the boundaries between the territories of different packs from the corpses you find from skirmishes at the borders.
Basically any colony insect
Chimps go to war for territory, this has been pretty well documented as of recent
They're turning the freaking frogs gay!!!!!
Turning the Frickin' Frogs Gay! (Remix)
Also Shad still married? I thought I had read rumors of divorce wasn't sure.
She goes to a different school
How in the world is this my first time learning that the silly little sword guys are homophobic???
Fun fact: A ton of eggs and younglings are neglected, and homosexual penguin couples will take care of the abandoned younglings and eggs
I am 25 minutes in, Shad has yet to make it past the intro. Damn. When you get this bamboozled over a couple quick action shots of animals before an announcer even opens their mouth, you probably are not mature enough for hte conversation.
Shadiversity: I'm totally not bigoted and will make no judgements against a person for being gay. Unless they suggest equivalency. If they suggest they are my equal I will pitch a fit.
Nature and the world are more beautiful than humanity and the things we construct.
didnt that guy used to just do Larp and swing swords or w.e, how on earth did it turn to this?
Mormonism
Did anyone expect Shad not to use reinterpretation and strawman?
I'm at the start of the video so it might come up later but wasn't there some kind of study or research that showed that animal researchers didn't even bother reporting on gay animal activities a majority of the time? So it's likely way more common and widespread amongst animals than we even realise.
That makes sense. Why would we write about the every day thing.
@@StormCrownSr Well the point of observing animals in a scientific context is to make records of them and their behaviours etc. If this is new information about a species then it should ideally be properly recorded and shared with the world just like any other new information.
i liked shedowvirsoty back then when he made halfased reviews of actual old weapons.
now it seems he got brain worms.
Well this made me unsubscribe from Shadiversity. I hadn't watched any of his videos in a while anyway, but as a pansexual trans girl I now realize I wouldn't be welcome on his channel anyway.
I swear they get all their "knowledge" on evolution from movies.
He says he doesn't push his het stuff on others and yet his ilk does it 24/7 here and irl
Homosexuality isn't bad. Nor is it good. You don't call living on land a moral thing. It's just how humans live.
It's hard for me to explain how this feels from the perspective of an ex-fan of his. It's like Peter Parker seeing how Tony Stark becomes an absolute asshole during the Civil War comic run.
Why is he upset that animals are gay? Bro, we literally ARE animals...😩
Dolphins definitely know what they doing. We give them way too much credit bc we think we're better than everything else. The Dolphins are smarter than us fam. We can't cut them slack
they definitely aren't smarter than humans, but are probably smart and social enough to make conscious ethical decisions.
@@nondescriptcat5620 they definitely are. Their brains are so much more complex than ours. It's hubris to pretend we are better than all other animals
@@Happyisboss no. they aren't. dolphins are estimated to have an average IQ of about 45. smarter than republicans, but not smarter than humans.
@nondescriptcat5620 ig it would be difficult for something without meaningful ways of communicating to complete an iq test against something else dedicated to proving they dont have internal experience....
It was said in the chat but the reason that mushrooms were part of the intro to the documentary was likely because fungi can have _tens of thousands_ of distinct sexes within the same species, absolutely wild.
I thought foxes were the gayest animal
I always thought it was seahorses
@@animalxINSTINCT89 nah seahorses had reversed sexual reproduction. Clownfish have natural sex changes due to simple biological functions (same with frogs)
No, that would be the whiptail lizard, which is an all female species that reproduces through parthenogenesis, which still involves a courtship ritual between couples.
We are, I am a furry you can trust me.
@@FrozEnbyWolf150 interesting!
The second host jumped ship. 😂
Shadiversity really should have stuck to swords...
Immediately comparing a sexuality to a morality...
In Mexican whiptail lizards it is always gay relationships that create offspring. They’re pretty cool.
That is going to blow Shad's mind. If he doesn't ignore the facts.
Fun fact: Most female foxes are strictly homosexual, and nearly all male foxes are bisexual. But they still somehow manage to have enough hetero sex to keep the species going, and they're fine, they're doin great. As long as we don't hunt them, they're doin great. Theyre just out there, in the woods and in the prairies, runnin and hoppin and rollin around, huntin mice and shit, playin, makin their goofy lil fox noises, they're great. They're just out there, vibin, like we should be.
I've always been amazed at people's ability to want to be left alone, but stick their noses in other people's business at the same time.
When I clicked on this video, there were a number of directions I thought this could go. “We paved over paradise and put up a parking lot” was not one I anticipated.
Damn, as a queer historical weapons nut I used to love shadiversity, this is why we can't have nice things
The tragic and hilarious thing about that, to me, is that most bigoted people wouldn't have or intentionally cause a problem with an actual queer person as much as the idea of one they've made up in their heads thanks to constant propagandizing they've been exposed to and choose to continue to inundate themselves in.
Oh look, something else that Shadiversity doesn't know wtf he's talking about.
List is long and growing longer.
Wait... Isn't this that guy who does weapon play larping and crap? He doesn't know crap about what hes talking about firstly. But secondly this is one of the biggest letdowns I have had in a while. He was one of my all time favorite RUclipsrs I had no idea he was like this. I am gay its great to know one of my favorite RUclipsrs think's I shouldn't exist because animals that are gay exist?
WTF is going on.
This is really disappointing. It actually hurts hearing this after knowing him for this many years. What like a decade at this point? A third of my life. This is really rough for me.
I hate finding out someone I liked was a bigot. The biggest one for me was probably JK Rowling, being a harry potter fan through childhood and my teenage years- and then realizing I was trans right about when she started openly, publicly despising us.
24:20 "I dont make being straight my identity" one of the lesser reasons i stopped watching shad years ago was because he would bring in his identity as a Traditional Married Mormon Male in every video
Damn... I actually really liked them back in the day. I hope they learn to be better people. Thanks for making this!
Stopping by for my daily dose of NAURRRRR
Dang I used to watch him for the sword content and fell off a while ago, this makes me sad to see that he feels this way.
I learned sonmuch about castles from Shad. It's so sad to see him say this
If Other Guy is Manos, then does that mean Sadversity is Torgo?
Apes On A Rock is my new band name
He's upset over everything
Someone introduce shad to the new Mexico whip tail
I literally learned about gay animals in psychology in 2019 or 2020. I think the college textbooks weren't brand new, so maybe they were printed between 2014 or 2017. I just remember that they were a few years old when we used them.
Also people forget that humans are also animals...
Dude, I watched TBR way back! I just found this channel after years. How are you and Hannah?
Jake I want to read your sapphic heist fantasy book.
One of the things that really gets me when talking to right wingers is how they have no memory. I grew up very christian in a very christian area. Being gay being "unnatural" was one of the biggest arguments, and pointing to it not happening in animals was the biggest piece of evidence. The second something they said is proven wrong they just act like it was never said and doesn't matter.
We need Clints Reptiles for this since he is a phd biologist and also a Christian
"Hey Shad, I would love have a chat with you about this topic on stream."
"You don't get to."
Lol
Man, couldn't he just settle with complaining about nunchucks' effectiveness as weapons?
Like seriously this is such a disaponitment, last time i heard about him was like a year ago or more when he was looking at the possibility of making a carbon fiber sword
These dudes give off big white night energy
Very fucking clear Shad's thumbnail isn't using the reclaimed version of queer
No fucking way.
i knew he was kind of pretentious about his religious channel, but i never bothered even looking at it
but *this is ridiculous on the face off it*
Shad would vote for a law that defines human as having xx or xy without checking if he is xyy, then be surprised when his assets are ceased because only humans can own property.
5:26 came at this from the wrong angle imo, since there have been studies demonstrating profound intelligence, memory, self-recognition, language etc in dolphins. The reason evil is (ostensibly) unique to humanity is not only because humanity (ostensibly) acts above instinct, but because it was humanity that first conceived of morality and immorality. In the Garden of Eden Eve and Adam ate the fruit of "the knowledge of good and evil"; I think that part of the story reflects the development of moral systems by humans, it is the contradiction of a moral code applied to immoral actions that "creates" evil in the first place.
Skimmilk unfortunately left the crew to do solo stuf he did a vid where he said that he wanna be a game dev and stuff
good for him
Couple of flamin drongos
Skim milk left. He made a whole video about starting his own channel and needing to get a new job. He didn't even get asend-offf video like the bald sword dude did. I wonder if Fluffyy is next to go. Obviously miracle whip (manos) isn't going anywhere because they are both so hateful and play off each other.
It’s always so funny with the whole “*they* are doing this” argument, like who are “they” and what do they think “they” are doing to “make” animals gay? Do they genuinely believe Alex Jones’ whole “they’re putting chemicals in the water to make the frickin frogs gay” stuff? Are we stuck in fuckin 2016 💀😂😂