Bloody frightening that 5.56 AP can go through 10mm. Mind you, I remember the range warden at Barry Buddon in Scotland as early as 1984 moaning about the all-too-visible holes in his falling plate targets, which had been caused by cops firing 5.56
Someone still has to use, service and maintain "this stuff". Someone still has to call it in. Someone still has to make the decisions. That's what waging war means, it's not just some flatphone swipe sh#t.
over 25 sec .you get to fire again, . a full round training.Ha Ha. and again and again you finaley subcumb to start hitting straigt after my eardefenders went missing, Seargeant gott wise
The AT4 is anti tank. But US doctrine usually have tanks and tank hunters with guided missiles to take out enemy tanks. The only real threat the infantryman face while indoors is most likely trucks armed with a heavy machine gun. These can be taken out by grenade launchers which are much more portable. The last tank vs US infantryman engagement was probably the Vietnam war and since then the US armored and helicopters have done most of the job in taking out enemy tanks and armors before the infantry roll in.
@@jackknall9966 well considering the new advanced weapon systems that have been developed, everything is obsolete. This video is 27 years old, we have automated laser systems, automated active denial systems (microwave), railguns, automated drones, highly advanced targeting AI that links to all the other systems and weapon platforms (Drones, Jets, Helis, and Naval systems) to the acquired targets with inked IFF capabilities. Look up DARPA.... War is going to be different now, our only hope is for peace....
@@fratercontenduntocculta8161 Ohh. Well that just seems like cheating, lol. I didn't know about the aluminum armor. How common is/was that? On another note, that 150mm x2 + ERA was impressive, holy shit.
As a British vet, Ive studied these events before and after the occupation in Denmark and Norway and these Swedish lads are right! Sweden and the UK provided both, the Norwegian resistance, but in Sweden there were more of private initiatives rather than the Swedish government!
Did he really say "quantum leap"? As soon as somebody uses the word "quantum" outside physics, my bullshit detector goes crazy! Watching Deepak Chopra is torture.
There was a Gustav operator's manual online somewhere, I seem to recall reading that Gustav gunners weren't supposed to fire more than 8 rounds in 24 hours. Which didn't make sense at first. Then I realized that there was probably a high risk of hearing loss and possibly risk, or concern there might be risk of brain injury from the air shockwave from the blast, that is, the BANG.
No we did not sell any weapons to Germany during the war. We did however buy weapons from Germany. Being cut of from the outside world, the only natons that we could trade with was with Germany and Finland, and to a much lesser extent, we could also import oil from South America. Out trade with Germany was that we sold mainly iron ore and machine components, while we bouth coal, machines, weapons and so forth from Germany.
The Norwegian resistance where really thankful for Sweden being neutral. The Swedish army supported the Norwegian resistance fighters with rifles and hand grenades etc. Swedish volunteers managed to hold Sälby in Trondheim county from the Germans so the Norwegian army and the French had time to get organized prev to the occupation!
@Jack ripper What I cant understand is why Sweden is regarded as the number one puppet state of Nazi Germany and nobody talks about the bankers in Switzerland who helped Germany even prior to the war? AND Wallstreet supported the Nazis directly by the Harriman brothers, Alan Dulles, Henry Ford and Presott Bush among many? Did you know that the Nazis built truck engines on licence from Gerald Ford throughout the whole war? Finland was allied to Germany during the attack on Russia as well. All the shit the common people of Sweden have to take for some Nazi friendly idiots in the Swedish government. And common Swedes have to take the blame for it and it is so unfair. Working and middle-class Swedes were in general no Nazi sympathizers!
As far as Norway goes, we did provide the resistance with a safe haven, training and weapons. The only nation that we exported weapons to during the war was to Finland. And obviously that Britain and the USA built 10's of thousands of Bofors 40mm guns during the war on license.
The Bofors manufactures provided England and the US (And Germany) with crucial weapons technology before the war and continue to do so, even if the Germans threatened to sink any Swedish ships who left the ports of England and the US.
In the "Battle of Sälby" (Think thats the title?) you can read about Swedish and Norwegians fighting to try to give the north time to get organized with British -French and Norwegian units.
@@puffnstuff12 The tank was killed, the crew survived with injuries. This article describes the event. There WERE a couple good pictures of the penetration, including the gold residue, but these are no longer there. rense.com/general44/what.htm
@@puffnstuff12 Only one of these projectiles was used. Whoever did it got their test data and went home. My guess is it was an advanced Russian EFP RPG, still in development. I'm speculating here, but to me that yellow metal residue is distinctive. This video from Bofors shows that other countries now have this technology. The clear message is that the M1A1, at least the version we had in 2003, can be killed by infantry from a peer adversary. Hopefully we have upgraded it by now.
@@josephastier7421 It wouldn't surprise me to see the Abrams being replaced soon as IED's have also penetrated it with relative ease. I was at WSMR back in the mid 80's when they were being tested for blast resistance which primarily focused on blast pressure wave damage to the top and sides.
@@josephastier7421 Dont worry they have been upgraded a few times since the second gulf war, their is a pretty big overhul rolling out for the Abrams in 2019 and 2020
the munitions should be tested in 3 configuration 1- at the maximum firing range of the weapon system characteristic and the ammo used / with the target maximum thickness for the weapon and the round to penetration the armor 2 - medium ranges or most common engagements distances for the weapon system and the ammo with maximum armor thickness for the target ( same case 1) ... 3- the short ranges and close engagements with maximum armor thickness for the target ( same case 1 and 2 ) .. They can re-test weapons and ammunition against lightly armored targets or against soft targets ...etc in order to simulate of various combat engagements scenarios .. As for the personal weapons , there are no engagements in open battles from 100 m. These 100 M range are suitable for personal defense weapons ( PDW ) and even some pistols . The Swedish forests may help to set an ambush and allow to fight a battle from close distances, but most traditional motorized or mechanized infantry combat engagements remain within the effective range of the individual weapon 300 M .. but very impressive arsenal of weapon systems and munitions ..
Well the swedish mathematician Arne Beurling broke the enigma code so that they could understand virtually all german messages. He also broke the soviet code. This saved thousands of lives for sure.
Remember that in most(if not all) parts of the world the "A" part of APC is just put there to make the soldiers feel like dying in a tin can before even seeing the enemy is less of an option than it really is.
Bofors was bought by Krupp in 1921 as front company to sell weapons to neutral nations and also to conduct new weapon research. Later it was sold back to Swedish Investors.
The Helmet was not just German. The Finnish army chosen their uniforms years before WWII. The blue and white Swastika who the Finnish aircraft carried was an old symbol a Swedish/Finnish officer wore as his personal emblem and had nothing to do with the German! (Strange you havent mentioned that?)
It looks quite silly seeing all these soldiers scurrying around with their massive recoilless rifles in front of an audience of civilians but let's remember...only a few decades ago , war with Russia seemed like a very real threat...
Any sources on that? UK supported norwegian resistancefighters with training and weapons. Sweden was only used as one of the "exfil" ways for norwegian fighters to get out of norway and usually back to the uk. And norway was not at all organized before the occupation
At 6:55...that whole segment is the most impressive. The AT12T. What a sell. Massive plates....terrible angle.....the most advanced E.R.A. of the time....and you blow a fucking hole out the back of the target. (Potential buyer in crowd) Wow. SOLD. Hahaha. I hope the people that developed that got massive bonuses that year. That was awesome.
Backlight22 At4s are very capable anti tank weapons, no doubt about it. The flaw was in the demonstration: even a WW2 vintage bazooka can penetrate that APC's armour at that range.
Maybe, I dont know how they would fare against that reactive armour though. In any case, my point was that these weapons are some of the best in the world at what they do. Being a swede, I'm kind of proud that they came from my country :)
+EcchiRevenge You guys don't get what was demonstrated: it wasn't about penetration, but about behind-armour effect. Normal HEAT doesn't do terribly much spall if the armour is thin because it's the armour that turns into spall. That EFP warhead produced much spalling, as seen on the so-called "dummys". A normal AT4 would have produced much less spalling.
The germans would´ve taken the iron by force probably. And even so, many danish jews were saved, and Raoul Wallenberg personally saved almost 20 000 jews.
I would not call that right, its like saying hundreds can be up to several thousand. When saying 1000's it should be ranging from 1000-10.000, anything over that is 10.000's and so forth.
because if the at4 can be coupled with the carl gustaf hepd 502 warhead, why not use it better with the heat 751? a heat 751 warhead with the at4cs would be incredible it would have no analogues in the world !!!
It's good, but not THAT good. The Carl-Gustav m3 is way more versatile and you cant just switch the ammo on an at4. I've used both in the danish army, and i would pick the M3 any time.
Answer 1/2 Yes, the scandinavian countries were neutral since a long time. Swedish fighters fought also in Finnland against the USSR. But, well - you speak from german occupation: So remember, that long before one german made a step to Norway, british commandos hurt Norways neutrality. Also the ship incident with the Altmark. Churchill wanted also send troops to Finnland in Winter 39/40, via Narvik. Anybody believes that colonial Brits would than leave? Would u have fight than against the Brits?
Because it weighed 14 kilograms and still only had an effective range of maybe 300 meters. For that weight you could get a ERYX missile with three times the range.
As Germany offfered peace by Vatican, Hess and other channels in 1941, to leave all occupied countries for peace in Europe, England ignored that all = bigger shame! In August 1939 Germany said: Poland can have their country, can have their border (which was illegal taken by league of nations, very undemocratic), just we want our city Danzig with 95% gemans inside and some street connection (like later to West Berlin) - England forced Poland to war! Shame!
"Thanks to Sweden's lovely neutralism, Norway was occupied!" You amaze me! I didnt know that the Swedish army had the power to stop Germany from occupy other countrys?
Your not totally right about it! Parts of the border where known escape passages for the resistance and unofficially the Swedish government had an "blind eye" to some of these spots. Just read more about Hjemme fronten and youll see! The rules of war says otherwise that soldiers in a regular army are to be brought to prison camps and armed civilians should be forced back to the country from witch they came. Theres no way they could have crossed the borders for supplies and get back otherwise.
Yeas, there were Nazis among the elite in all the Scandinavian countrys. You never hear about it from those who later where the occupied nations.As a Norwegian I understand you but Im not on to this crusade against Sweden or Germany! Hell, Finland took it way further and really joined force with the Germans but we Noregians rarely complain about it?
As I said If Bofors had a weapons industry in Germany as you claim? the manufactures of Bofors would had to stand trial in Nûrnberg since they would had to use slave labor on German soil!
Bloody frightening that 5.56 AP can go through 10mm. Mind you, I remember the range warden at Barry Buddon in Scotland as early as 1984 moaning about the all-too-visible holes in his falling plate targets, which had been caused by cops firing 5.56
This stuff is so good these days I'm surprised anyone wants to play soldier anymore.
"play soldier" damn son, you must play a lot of airsoft.
@@ichemosabe Nope, and I'm willing to bet I'm twice as old as you.
@@josephastier7421 5 x 2 equals 10
@@daddoba2618 Dangit, here I am only four years old. You got me, bruh.
Someone still has to use, service and maintain "this stuff".
Someone still has to call it in.
Someone still has to make the decisions.
That's what waging war means, it's not just some flatphone swipe sh#t.
5:14 yes, but can our child soldiers handle the recoil?
True haha
first thing i thought too
It got a backblast to counter the recoil so yes they can handle it. Just tell them to not shoot it indoors or stand behind it
Nothing on Earth can hold a candle to the good ol bofors
Ive fired the RBS 70 and 90 in an official visit by the British army to Sweden! Some great stuff you guys make!
gotta love the rate of fire for the Carl Gustav.
if you miss, follow up shots are so quick.
over 25 sec .you get to fire again, . a full round training.Ha Ha. and again and again you finaley subcumb to start hitting straigt after my eardefenders went missing, Seargeant gott wise
The US Army only recently adopted the confined space version of the AT4. This video was from 1992. I can't believe it took that damn long.
The AT4 is anti tank. But US doctrine usually have tanks and tank hunters with guided missiles to take out enemy tanks. The only real threat the infantryman face while indoors is most likely trucks armed with a heavy machine gun. These can be taken out by grenade launchers which are much more portable. The last tank vs US infantryman engagement was probably the Vietnam war and since then the US armored and helicopters have done most of the job in taking out enemy tanks and armors before the infantry roll in.
"immediatley after the visitors inspection the demo began"' BANG WAPOOM BOOOOM and all the visitors just exploded
bruh xD
The faces of a lot of brass realizing their tanks are now obsolete.
It will always be easier to defeat armor than to develop it.
@jujitsuman68 You can't invade without armor.
@jujitsuman68 say that again after a 40T heavy Armored vehicles holds you down with a 30mm while infantry jumps out of it and clears the field.
saying that tanks are obsolete due to those at weapons is like saying that infantry is obsolete because everyone is carrying a rifle
@@jackknall9966 well considering the new advanced weapon systems that have been developed, everything is obsolete. This video is 27 years old, we have automated laser systems, automated active denial systems (microwave), railguns, automated drones, highly advanced targeting AI that links to all the other systems and weapon platforms (Drones, Jets, Helis, and Naval systems) to the acquired targets with inked IFF capabilities. Look up DARPA.... War is going to be different now, our only hope is for peace....
Jackknall absolutely true. It isn’t about what equipment you have, it is to what use you put it.
4:38 Is that Swedish way to say LMAO?
lmao
I'm really surprised by those 5.56 and especially the 7.62 AP rounds. A goddamn APC??
That APC also has aluminum armor. Focused firing of enough regular rounds will penetrate it too.
@@fratercontenduntocculta8161 Ohh. Well that just seems like cheating, lol. I didn't know about the aluminum armor. How common is/was that?
On another note, that 150mm x2 + ERA was impressive, holy shit.
@@lando8913 I think the Bradley uses or used aluminum armor to reduce weight.
@@fratercontenduntocculta8161 looked a lot like rust on the plates though...
@@fratercontenduntocculta8161 That was a PBV301, converted from an old tank originally built in 1942.
With proper Swedish steel armor.
As a British vet, Ive studied these events before and after the occupation in Denmark and Norway and these Swedish lads are right! Sweden and the UK provided both, the Norwegian resistance, but in Sweden there were more of private initiatives rather than the Swedish government!
This is almost 30 years ago. Imagine what they have today ☠☠☠☠☠
16 years after this (15 years ago) the NLAW started production. Famous for wreaking Russian armor in Ukraine with ease.
Did he really say "quantum leap"? As soon as somebody uses the word "quantum" outside physics, my bullshit detector goes crazy! Watching Deepak Chopra is torture.
9:08 I've fired one of those (smoke). The firing detonation, albeit no recoil, is is significant _BANG_ ;-)
There was a Gustav operator's manual online somewhere, I seem to recall reading that Gustav gunners weren't supposed to fire more than 8 rounds in 24 hours. Which didn't make sense at first. Then I realized that there was probably a high risk of hearing loss and possibly risk, or concern there might be risk of brain injury from the air shockwave from the blast, that is, the BANG.
*Tank Burnt Down*
You Were Killed by: *BILL*
No we did not sell any weapons to Germany during the war.
We did however buy weapons from Germany.
Being cut of from the outside world, the only natons that we could trade with was with Germany and Finland, and to a much lesser extent, we could also import oil from South America. Out trade with Germany was that we sold mainly iron ore and machine components, while we bouth coal, machines, weapons and so forth from Germany.
The Norwegian resistance where really thankful for Sweden being neutral. The Swedish army supported the Norwegian resistance fighters with rifles and hand grenades etc. Swedish volunteers managed to hold Sälby in Trondheim county from the Germans so the Norwegian army and the French had time to get organized prev to the occupation!
@Jack ripper What I cant understand is why Sweden is regarded as the number one puppet state of Nazi Germany and nobody talks about the bankers in Switzerland who helped Germany even prior to the war? AND Wallstreet supported the Nazis directly by the Harriman brothers, Alan Dulles, Henry Ford and Presott Bush among many? Did you know that the Nazis built truck engines on licence from Gerald Ford throughout the whole war?
Finland was allied to Germany during the attack on Russia as well. All the shit the common people of Sweden have to take for some Nazi friendly idiots in the Swedish government. And common Swedes have to take the blame for it and it is so unfair. Working and middle-class Swedes were in general no Nazi sympathizers!
As far as Norway goes, we did provide the resistance with a safe haven, training and weapons. The only nation that we exported weapons to during the war was to Finland. And obviously that Britain and the USA built 10's of thousands of Bofors 40mm guns during the war on license.
Wonderful bit of history, very useful, thank you
Christ, he reloads fast!
The Bofors manufactures provided England and the US (And Germany) with crucial weapons technology before the war and continue to do so, even if the Germans threatened to sink any Swedish ships who left the ports of England and the US.
Old fashioned but I'd definitely bring a Carl Gustav if I had to go into battle.
In the "Battle of Sälby" (Think thats the title?) you can read about Swedish and Norwegians fighting to try to give the north time to get organized with British -French and Norwegian units.
that guy kicked the 84mm cartridge out faster than a FAMAS. Hard core.
Corporal .
you wanna take a detail , Out to the Bonus Test Range and police up
The Brass
7:54 Looks like the same gold-colored residue we found after one of our M1A1 tanks got plinked in Iraq. Never found the shooter, or the weapon tube.
How badly did it damage the tank?
@@puffnstuff12 The tank was killed, the crew survived with injuries. This article describes the event. There WERE a couple good pictures of the penetration, including the gold residue, but these are no longer there.
rense.com/general44/what.htm
@@puffnstuff12 Only one of these projectiles was used. Whoever did it got their test data and went home. My guess is it was an advanced Russian EFP RPG, still in development.
I'm speculating here, but to me that yellow metal residue is distinctive. This video from Bofors shows that other countries now have this technology. The clear message is that the M1A1, at least the version we had in 2003, can be killed by infantry from a peer adversary. Hopefully we have upgraded it by now.
@@josephastier7421
It wouldn't surprise me to see the Abrams being replaced soon as IED's have also penetrated it with relative ease. I was at WSMR back in the mid 80's when they were being tested for blast resistance which primarily focused on blast pressure wave damage to the top and sides.
@@josephastier7421 Dont worry they have been upgraded a few times since the second gulf war, their is a pretty big overhul rolling out for the Abrams in 2019 and 2020
Yeas, it will never be obsolete! Just like the Kalashnikov.
wow, that APC has the tracks and suspension from an WWII tank the pz38 (t)
+perreterecon Correct! The pbv 301 were rebuilt m/41 tanks, which in turn were license built Skoda LT-38 (a.k.a. pzkpfw 38(t) )
+MPI1000 Nice, now i know whats the name of that vehicle.
And this is why we fight wars... all these guys eager to buy new toys and actually get to use them
the munitions should be tested in 3 configuration 1- at the maximum firing range of the weapon system characteristic and the ammo used / with the target maximum thickness for the weapon and the round to penetration the armor
2 - medium ranges or most common engagements distances for the weapon system and the ammo with maximum armor thickness for the target ( same case 1) ... 3- the short ranges and close engagements with maximum armor thickness for the target ( same case 1 and 2 ) ..
They can re-test weapons and ammunition against lightly armored targets or against soft targets ...etc in order to simulate of various combat engagements scenarios ..
As for the personal weapons , there are no engagements in open battles from 100 m. These 100 M range are suitable for personal defense weapons ( PDW ) and even some pistols . The Swedish forests may help to set an ambush and allow to fight a battle from close distances, but most traditional motorized or mechanized infantry combat engagements remain within the effective range of the individual weapon 300 M .. but very impressive arsenal of weapon systems and munitions ..
Well the swedish mathematician Arne Beurling broke the enigma code so that they could understand virtually all german messages. He also broke the soviet code. This saved thousands of lives for sure.
Bahahaha yea no the Poles broke the enigma code
3:53 That's an APC? I played with Tonka trucks that were bigger than that!
Remember that in most(if not all) parts of the world the "A" part of APC is just put there to make the soldiers feel like dying in a tin can before even seeing the enemy is less of an option than it really is.
Its a weasel Recce armoured veh, fast as hell.
at first I thought they were firing at my riding lawn mower and then I realized it was an APC
@@catlee8064 Its a PBV301, converted from an old tank from 1942.
@@Merecir I stand corrected.
Damn those AP rounds did quite well against the "APC" armour
Bofors was bought by Krupp in 1921 as front company to sell weapons to neutral nations and also to conduct new weapon research. Later it was sold back to Swedish Investors.
And here we go again why this was recomended to me
Brazil is a regular customer from Boffors
The Helmet was not just German. The Finnish army chosen their uniforms years before WWII.
The blue and white Swastika who the Finnish aircraft carried was an old symbol a Swedish/Finnish officer wore as his personal emblem and had nothing to do with the German! (Strange you havent mentioned that?)
I am carlov gustov operator👌⚠️😁
the bofors i remember were anti aircraft twin mounted on british ships in ww2
That was a BOFORS 40mm auto canon. It was used on British, American and German warships in WWII.
Greetingz from FinlAnd 🇫🇮🇫🇮💥💥
Welcome to sweden anti tank weapons manufacturing xD
would put you off wanting to be a tankie.
It looks quite silly seeing all these soldiers scurrying around with their massive recoilless rifles in front of an audience of civilians but let's remember...only a few decades ago , war with Russia seemed like a very real threat...
Aged like old milk
Thats not entirerly true, we helped the Germans to make the 88mm AA gun(bofors and Krupp worked together). And that was before the war.
5,56 AP was standard in denmark 1999
remember when europe (outside germany) actually built stuff?
still do
Still does, and usually at lower cost than us hardware.
Any sources on that? UK supported norwegian resistancefighters with training and weapons. Sweden was only used as one of the "exfil" ways for norwegian fighters to get out of norway and usually back to the uk. And norway was not at all organized before the occupation
At 6:55...that whole segment is the most impressive. The AT12T.
What a sell.
Massive plates....terrible angle.....the most advanced E.R.A. of the time....and you blow a fucking hole out the back of the target.
(Potential buyer in crowd) Wow. SOLD. Hahaha. I hope the people that developed that got massive bonuses that year. That was awesome.
Tested AT weapon against 38mm armour of APC...seems legit.
EcchiRevenge At such a suicidally close range too! May as well throw a bomb at it. Armour piercing bullets were very impressive though.
EcchiRevenge You know these weapons are the favorite AT-weapons of the us army right and have been used ever since they were developed.
Backlight22 At4s are very capable anti tank weapons, no doubt about it. The flaw was in the demonstration: even a WW2 vintage bazooka can penetrate that APC's armour at that range.
Maybe, I dont know how they would fare against that reactive armour though. In any case, my point was that these weapons are some of the best in the world at what they do. Being a swede, I'm kind of proud that they came from my country :)
+EcchiRevenge
You guys don't get what was demonstrated: it wasn't about penetration, but about behind-armour effect. Normal HEAT doesn't do terribly much spall if the armour is thin because it's the armour that turns into spall.
That EFP warhead produced much spalling, as seen on the so-called "dummys". A normal AT4 would have produced much less spalling.
The germans would´ve taken the iron by force probably. And even so, many danish jews were saved, and Raoul Wallenberg personally saved almost 20 000 jews.
are there any videos about the swedish sub-hunting kit???
The land of the Nobel peace prize.
No thats Norway,
@@TheMrbeastinside u stupid?
Too bad that the AT-12T never went behind prototype stage.
AldanFerrox im thinking it's a good thing they didn't find there way into Woolworths .
@@markbravo6077 Their*
'cough' NLAW 'cough'
Wife frnds: Ok, tell us all about your first night 😋
Wife: 4:14 5:29. 🤐
🤣
Lol "Full penetration with Internal damage"
Killing its a business! Business its Good!
Megadeth!
I would not call that right, its like saying hundreds can be up to several thousand.
When saying 1000's it should be ranging from 1000-10.000, anything over that is 10.000's and so forth.
At that time Bofors partly belonged to Krupp.
because if the at4 can be coupled with the carl gustaf hepd 502 warhead, why not use it better with the heat 751? a heat 751 warhead with the at4cs would be incredible it would have no analogues in the world !!!
This is fascinating...
So was al Qaeda.
It's good, but not THAT good. The Carl-Gustav m3 is way more versatile and you cant just switch the ammo on an at4.
I've used both in the danish army, and i would pick the M3 any time.
I have fired a live AT-4.
Pero esos misiles se dispararon a muy corta distancia. Funcionaran igual a 500m o mas???
daniel carrillo 700m +
Answer 1/2
Yes, the scandinavian countries were neutral since a long time. Swedish fighters fought also in Finnland against the USSR.
But, well - you speak from german occupation:
So remember, that long before one german made a step to Norway, british commandos hurt Norways neutrality. Also the ship incident with the Altmark.
Churchill wanted also send troops to Finnland in Winter 39/40, via Narvik.
Anybody believes that colonial Brits would than leave?
Would u have fight than against the Brits?
1000? they have bought around 650.000 at4's
Any generals from Yugoslavia in the crowd?
why they never produced the at12t? it would have been insurmountable
Because it weighed 14 kilograms and still only had an effective range of maybe 300 meters. For that weight you could get a ERYX missile with three times the range.
@@MandolinMagi Or keep it around and later on develop it further and call it NLAW.
BONUS RANGE !
When I saw the thumbnail I though the soldier was gonna shoot the bazooka hands up and without looking, like a boss.
Why dudes where getting on the chopper with their stocks not folded ? Lol
It's the Trump of anti-armour systems!
Fat and aggressive
Secondly both my native countrys (Norway and England) supported Germany pre to the war.
As Germany offfered peace by Vatican, Hess and other channels in 1941, to leave all occupied countries for peace in Europe, England ignored that all = bigger shame!
In August 1939 Germany said: Poland can have their country, can have their border (which was illegal taken by league of nations, very undemocratic), just we want our city Danzig with 95% gemans inside and some street connection (like later to West Berlin) - England forced Poland to war! Shame!
That's complete BS Nazi lover.
those where bofors 40mm pum-pum
5:30あたりで日本語が聞こえたような...。
Now that is a weird aspect ratio
Bra film :)
i didn't see any bra...
@@sliceofbread2611 It was all bra.
sweden fuck yeah!!!!!!
now swedens army is commanded by feminists... gj!
10:20 So basicly a APHE projektile like a Pzgr 39
Is this paul Harrell?
"Thanks to Sweden's lovely neutralism, Norway was occupied!" You amaze me! I didnt know that the Swedish army had the power to stop Germany from occupy other countrys?
Welfare intensifies.
Hi from Sweden
Your not totally right about it! Parts of the border where known escape passages for the resistance and unofficially the Swedish government had an "blind eye" to some of these spots. Just read more about Hjemme fronten and youll see! The rules of war says otherwise that soldiers in a regular army are to be brought to prison camps and armed civilians should be forced back to the country from witch they came. Theres no way they could have crossed the borders for supplies and get back otherwise.
8:51 Nice camo job, the golden ring makes it useless, but good job on dipping your hands in green. Guess you don't value your wrists.
cipher88101 shut up boot
Ah, so this is how all these tin pot Generals get all their medals, from attending demonstrations like these.
This looks like it took place in Sweden ofc lol
these people need girlfriends
Wow swedish made all these weapons
Probably a lot of Allen head screws then.
and these is only the stuff they wanted to sell - all there are scrapped fortifications and other stuff nobody outside abroad will never know -
Epic
You are all raving mad.
We:
dont think anyone claimd we were making wepons in GER, we sold a shit load of cannons, explosives, metals and engines too the nazis thow...
är alla vapen svenska?
Ja.
This new model has a frendley easy access to self destruct button...this guy sounds like he's selling a car....
i dont know that very hard to make single tiny hole on tank's armour
it's not the size of the hole but what kind of damage it causes in the confined space. You saw the results of that hit on the APC, right?
It’s not the hole, it’s the bits of molten metal flying around the crew compartment in excess of Mach 1 that’s the clincher.
Yeas, there were Nazis among the elite in all the Scandinavian countrys. You never hear about it from those who later where the occupied nations.As a Norwegian I understand you but Im not on to this crusade against Sweden or Germany! Hell, Finland took it way further and really joined force with the Germans but we Noregians rarely complain about it?
Quantum means very very very tiny
No, it means a different level. A quantum leap is an electron jumping to another orbital for example.
Which is a very very very very very tiny jump
Which is very very very, tiny
Sweden supported germay with huge ammounts of iron to the war industry, and also allowed the german troops to be transported by train over sweden.
8:30 what is that rifle name
Jeff domner Old version of the AK 5
@@bootleg8557 thank you
As I said If Bofors had a weapons industry in Germany as you claim? the manufactures of Bofors would had to stand trial in Nûrnberg since they would had to use slave labor on German soil!