Actually we can't say how much faster it is judging by this result. He was cpu bound on steam, and on battle net the fps is a lot higher but there is a gpu bottleneck now, so cpu could possibly deliver even more fps.
guys change mic settings from ''All Lobby'' to ''Party Only'' , it will give you some extra FPS . mine jumped from 50 to 90 fps , i normally get 120 but better than nothing.
they always do this. in Vanguard, your textures are always low on steam version. doesn't matter if you run it in 16k with Ultra textures. default textures will ALWAYS be low. now I am 100% sure they this intentionally so that players use that god awful battlenet app
Why is 3000 devs still the narrative? that was years ago for mw2. BO6 was worked on both by treyarch and raven, at most 500 developers worked on this game lol
@@DethronedCrown Not really, 9800X3D has a lot more single core performance compared to 7000 series. And 5800X3D is also a 8 core cpu but it loses to 13th gen i7 most of the time.
@@bilbobaggins8794 Its about 10% faster in games, decent but I wouldn't really call it "a lot", in any case I looked up a video from a channel called "pyurologie", warzone 4k minimum settings, its sitting around mid 70s - mid 80s usage most the time, so yeah pretty much the same.
i had this same problem with God of War on steam. It was literally unplayable constant stutters and some times freezing and dropping to 0 frames. Bought it on epic and played without any problems. I've never had that problem with steam before. I was running a 4070 ti super at the time.
@@OrenSaidAThing It's crazy. I looked into it and people were saying to turn different things off like the overlay. Did all of that and nothing changed. it's making me buy games away from steam now
The issue is that in steam you need to change the voice chat to something else than all lobby. This fixes the fps . Issue is: all lobby + steam = low fps
@@sarahmonalisa3057 yep, I also struggled with this problem when urzikistan didn't run 5800x3d 4070ti only 80fps (220fps when less than 20 players alive endgame) voice settings when you turn it off it was somewhat playable anyway. hope they fix it soon. it would be nice to be able to play +170fps from the beginning of the game
Not sure if this is the issue here (doesn't really seem like it since CPU usage is also much higher on Battle Net which wouldn't happen with Frame Gen) but there's a bug where FSR Frame Gen secretly enables by default (happened to me and many others) and obviously boosts frame rates by quite a bit. You have to go to campaign, enable FSR upscaling and then Frame Gen appears toggled on, and it does affect the other modes even though it's only in the campaign.
Great video as always thank you for the clarification. Even though I'm on a low end laptop, the comparison still stands. The differences are more noticeable on my platform because of the lack of playability before, and the now actual playable difference. Goes from 15 minutes of hell to at least a couple hours of decent gaming. I just like this game and it's frustrating not to be able to play it freely.
Isn't the steam version bugged with regards its proximity audio still? It was like this in the past also, and many players have reported it with this new version, especially with the steam version. To "Fix" it, go to Settings -> Audio -> Voice Chat -> and put Game Voice Channel to Party Only, after that turn Voice Chat off! (This is obviously not a fix, but is a workaround) Other have had success with disabling resizable BAR, but its hard to know if thats legit, as the gains are not as large as reported from the first "fix". (For context, MW3 era WZ also ran better on may systems with rebar disabled)
I was here for the experience on launch day. I was so confused and looked on RUclips, there was one video abt the party chat feature and THATS WAS ALL THE INFO at the time, now everyone knows abt the fps drop, crazy how a bug took 2-3 weeks to go viral lol
I noticed this a while back. Halo Infinite was doing the same for me for a while. Ran higher frames from the xbox app BUT the game crashed more on me from the app so I dealt with lower frames and played from steam. It was only about a 10-15% difference for halo for me though. This difference is insane and honestly should be seen as unacceptable.
PC Gamepass version also is broken like steam. RTX 3070 barely holds 60 at 1440p High at native resolution. Beta had no issues getting 90-100 on the same settings
Game pass works better for me, I had cod on steam since mw2 and in s1 was getting only 50fps in battle royale but I switched for gamepass on xbox app and now having like 80-90 fps in Urzykistan and 110-120 fps on resurgence. I have rtx3060ti and ryzen5 3600 and same native 1440p resolution.
@@A-a-ron01220 I play on game pass and this new update with the new zombies map made the fps worse for me by about 10 fps with the exact same settings and its just less stable
I remember when overwatch 2 came to steam, I swapped over to it for like a month and a half because I just wanted to track the hours on game. I randomly went back to bnet launcher and was SHOCKED at how much smoother it felt. I don't keep my fps on since i get well over 400+ all the time so I can't say for sure if Steam lowered it or just had worse 1% lows but playing on a 360hz monitor I could just tell instantly how much better bnet felt
Your talking about a company who charges money for better audio so I wouldn't be surprised if they did this to try and move more ppl into their algorithm.
Thank you Kryzzp so much for this video!!! I didn’t think you would get this out so fast but once again you prove yourself as my favorite benchmarker!! ❤❤❤
I unfortunately have steam I disabled the steam overlay the game bar overlay and the nvidia overlay and the game still runs like dog shit I went to the Xbox version and fixed all my issues
@@GodisFrisky 100 precent! have the same, have to tweak so much just to feel satisfied. I think the gamepass version is getting the same results as steam..
@@GodisFrisky Same.. MW3 I was locked at 165hz at all times. Boot up this game on gamepass and it constantly drops frames and gpu utilization plummets like the game is artificially limiting the performance
for me in battle net the performance for the big map and area 99 is still very bad, lost about 70fps compared to pre integration. On rebirth i have those fps back though - there the performance is great 🫡 this just shows how bad the state of urzikstan and area 99 is regarding performance .. hope for some improvements there
I finally decided to just try the Battlenet version after playing on Steam since last season of Warzone. Let's just say that Battlenet made my game run 100% better. 60+ fps gains in some heavy areas is insane! I feel like it is as smooth as the old map now. Wow! (7800x3d and 4070super on Win 11 Version 10.0.22631 Build 22631)
i always wanted a 4090, but seeing people who have one only getting 200+ fps and i get 200+ with my 7800xt in 1440p on bo6 for more or less quarter of the price made me rethink my decision!
Because most people with an RTX 4090 will be using 4K displays. You can't compare 1440p with 4K and then assume you made a better purchasing decision, because the RTX 4090 will significantly outperform the 7800 XT at the same resolution.
@@foggy922 no not at all im going by the people ive seen with one, they are in 1440p and thats what im comparing to i didnt mention the difference in 4k did i.. i did say in 1440p
@ I actually didn’t buy this one for once! And Im sticking to that, but im just going off of the free trial right now. I played the Beta and now the free trial. If it hits like $30 I might buy it but I’ll never get that deal lol
Perhaps turning off the Steam Overlay for it might help? After all, there's a slight chance that Activision isn't deliberately pushing a worse version to Steam...
@@Griffith74 The Steam overlay has always been quite heavy on resources and has gotten even heavier now that it has automatic background recording on by default.
I actually thought I was going crazy bc I knew my rig should be doing more frames, swapped to battlenet today and the performance increase is crazy. it’s scummy but I’m glad to see my frames where they should be.
@ sorry for the late reply but even bo6 multiplayer has some problems, my 13700k cant even get 200 fps in most scenarios even though it was getting 270fps in cpu bound scenarios in mw3
@@zWORMzGaming even if was turned off before BIG update you need to turned it ON and turn OFF. Yea it's dumb but it a bit fixed performance for 4080 and 5800x3d. It's still need to be fixed anyway
Shot in the dark here; check if steam is recording the gameplay in the background, they recently added that to steam. not sure what the default settings are but perhaps also encoding said recording on the CPU rather than GPU.
It’s not on by default. But I will also say I’ve tested it a lot and only get around 5-10 fps difference with a 3080 10gb and 7800x3d with the bit rate at the highest available. No noticeable difference over shadowplay from my testing.
@@hypnotickiller4802 Yes because it's likely being encoded using GPU. Not saying I know for sure the FPS would drop that much if encoding on CPU but it's something to consider.
Crazy i went with your exact settings on my 7900xt and it gives me 160-185 FPS at 4k. I am really impressed since it was 590€ and isnt too far behind the 4090 if you think it is 300% the price
It doesn’ t! I was shocked when I saw this and went buying a battlenet version as well, i already own a steam version. I tried two matches and requested a refund. Performance was exactly the same.
@@hypnotickiller4802 7800x3d and 7900xtx on steam and i can play zombies with well over 200 fps on high, only the bug map warzone has bad performance for me
Ill be sending a bunch of these videos to valve support when i request a refund. Edit: it seems like steam is offering refunds for the game if you link them videos about this issue since i just got mine. Please if you are having issues get a refund and hit activision in the wallet. This is the last cod game I buy after this.
For whatever reason disabling resize bar was the fix for me on the steam version. This was the first time I purchased call of duty on steam and will likely be the last
Disabling resizable bar worked for me too. Maybe you should do a comparison between config files - has to be a setting that is different between Steam and Battlenet.
I always knew shit like this will happen with games that have seperate launchers on steam, they want you on their shit launcher so they don't pay steam that 30% cut😂
It's not textures, textures mostly have an impact on VRAM usage. It's level of detail, aka LOD that's the problem. Higher FOV results in lower polygon count in stuff far away resulting in better FPS.
Good though but it is not that. It was off completely and I still saw an 60+ fps gain on Battlenet over steam. Overlay off and voice chat off too. Strange enough, they use the same config file when launched too.
i recommend you to use the AMD Fidelity CAS at 80% as sharpener instead of the NVIDIA Image Scaling, its much sharper and gets slightly better fps than the nvidia scaler on native
the reason for high cpu usage is because fsr frame gen is on by default on the game to turn it off you have to edit the config file in mw3 when having it enabled it had both gpu and cpu maxed out instead of gpu mainly being maxed or if on a weaker gpu cpu being maxed out reason for steams performance could be steam pulling recourses or that call of duty is not optimized well on it
@@NvyZero no but because they have to pay steam a certain % of their sales on the game so they just make the game better on their own launchers so they can make more money
@@dimastorres5105 whaaaaattttttttt i bought the 4070 yesterday and mine is getting 110 fps on low wtf man i almost wanted to bring the card back the problem is the xboxapp then
@@K.A-87 Welp somethings causing you issues, i've been getting between 180-220 on xbox app on normal/high settings with a ryzen 7 5800x and a rtx 4060.
this game is even worse cheating is insane online games is dead since 2020 sadly appreciate the hell out of your videos best benchmark and video cards reviewer in RUclips
man i love that i bought it on steam its playable but me being able to go from 90 up to probably around 130 😭 with a 3060 i could up my distance graphics so much then
I do believe that it is due to steam taking more ram and running with high resources in background so in this case it is a good thing battle net did for their users :)
I was a decent steam warzone player . But by the time it goes the game got hard . So I tried the Asia server of warzone . I just tried battle net for the hardness . But also noticed that yes the performance has also improved
It's still pretty crappy in terms of optimisation even on Battlenet. My GPU runs at an average of around 62%, power limit occasionally hit, about 30FPS less and temps about 5 degrees down from usual. They did the same with MW3/WZ3 integration and it took them about 3 seasons to sort out - almost like they've just reset all the optimisations back to the beginning. In the morning before the WZ4 switch I was getting 90-95% GPU load average, power limit on all the time (as it should be) and runnning about 30-35FPS more - after the switch I was running 55% GPU load so they have improved it a little but still sucks. Intrigued you're getting GPU load in the high 90's....
I confirm. I play Dine Light 1 and 2, and in the Steam version Dine Light 1 is 140-160, on the pirate version it’s over 220; in Dine Light 2 it’s exactly the same - there are fewer frames than on the pirate version
I think its because on steam you can leave reviews and they don't want Intel CPUs crashing, I noticed that on my 13900k is limited to 100fps and the CPU Time is stuck at 10, if you enable the HUD CPU Time is 10 all the time, so artificially limited by CPU frametime
OMG thank you! I downloaded the game a few days ago from Steam and I had 60 FPS on the lowest settings with a 5700x3d 1660Super. I know it's not a great GPU and only 6gb but I know I should definitely get higher frames
Yea I’m on a rx580 8g 2048 lol an it’s far better than that. I see 130 average and a lot of times much more. At 1080p it’s a beater with a graphics card but I still play hard on it
Interesting, I noticed you have the X3D 16 core cpu, maybe the amd driver for core parking is borked with the steam runin wz? might be interesting to test with a non 3d cpu
It's pretty weird... Some Time ago i also had the same problem with Heroes & Generals... The standalone client ran perfectly fine back in the days with 90FPS on my good old R9 280X and the Steam Version ran with only 60-70FPS.😂
Hey I know you tested Ark survival Ascended about a year ago and the game ran pretty bad, but they a released an optimization patch a few months ago. May be worth a test since ark is known as the GPU killer.
Steam causing fps issues is not evens surprising to me. Black Ops 3 before the new steam updates was golden, I was able to keep 200 fps with a GTX 970, now I can barely even hit 200 on the same settings with an RX 5700 XT. My game stutters a lot since I don't have campaign or dead ops arcade installed.
Please tomorrow try every single video card on S.T.A.L.K.E.R 2 many people were waiting after 15 years to play it but the Nvidia video benchmark used DLSS 3 with no info what card they used which confused us even more, and they updated the specs list again so I hope you keep eye on it and benchmark it on many cards I always appreciate your hard work and I love this channel
The difference is crazy, I wasn't expecting literally 50% more Fps
it is 100%
It is closer to 100% more FPS than to 50%
60% guys
Actually we can't say how much faster it is judging by this result. He was cpu bound on steam, and on battle net the fps is a lot higher but there is a gpu bottleneck now, so cpu could possibly deliver even more fps.
@@brzimtrco6142 he wasnt cpu bound on the steam version???? also cpu bound in this game with his cpu on 4k with a 4090 is just not possible
This video needs to get out there more
Most definitely
💯 cause this some bullshii
guys change mic settings from ''All Lobby'' to ''Party Only'' , it will give you some extra FPS .
mine jumped from 50 to 90 fps , i normally get 120 but better than nothing.
they always do this. in Vanguard, your textures are always low on steam version. doesn't matter if you run it in 16k with Ultra textures. default textures will ALWAYS be low. now I am 100% sure they this intentionally so that players use that god awful battlenet app
can i know what exactly is wrong with the battle net launcher
i’ve never had any problems with it including dl speeds so i just keep buying cod on it
Man am I glad I stopped buying Call of Duty games after Black Ops 2...
@@MichaeltheORIGINAL1 lmao same after bo3 i had to move on to diff games
Ew why you playing vanguard
the cost of simping for fat gaben
Well its obvious Activision/Blizzard are trying to make people to run their launcher, I don't think Valve has a fault here
If that was the case then they'd also do that with the Microsoft store version, but that one is fucked too.
Its bugged
@@bananaboy482warzone thru xbox app is still way better than steam
Whats odd to me is that in Overwatch 2 its the exact opposite, Steam runs significantly better than in their own launcher.
@@bananaboy482is that why my 4080 on Xbox gamepass is running like crap?
Kryzzp the best benchmarker that ever exists
the greatest benchmarker thats ever lived
@@muff1n36 lol
best benchmarker
Thank you 😃
day 11 trying to reach 100k subs just by responding to comments 💀🥲
@@zWORMzGamingI farted had chilli the smell was bacon little egg smell to from my protein
@@Jigaboo1929what
But worst ads showed
4 years 3000+ devs HOLY SHIEEETTTT....
To many cooks
4 years ago I lost 3000 devs in a blink of an eye and the gamers just fking watch
Why is 3000 devs still the narrative? that was years ago for mw2. BO6 was worked on both by treyarch and raven, at most 500 developers worked on this game lol
Your wrong dude, treyarch and raven are small teams
Absolutely SHIT
%75-95 CPU usage is also crazy, I wonder what it would be with 9800X3D.
this is at like 200 fps what do you expect
@@krazykatz97_1 More..
Would probably be about the same since they are both only 8 core cpus, which is what that percentage usage is measuring.
@@DethronedCrown Not really, 9800X3D has a lot more single core performance compared to 7000 series. And 5800X3D is also a 8 core cpu but it loses to 13th gen i7 most of the time.
@@bilbobaggins8794 Its about 10% faster in games, decent but I wouldn't really call it "a lot", in any case I looked up a video from a channel called "pyurologie", warzone 4k minimum settings, its sitting around mid 70s - mid 80s usage most the time, so yeah pretty much the same.
Its wild how much difference those launchers have
Activision treats Steam as an afterthought
@@dekchi8781 ye
Yet battlenet is very slow with downloads to me always
@@Niels_f2704 ye
@@Niels_f2704for me i habe fayter download on battlenet … steam so slow …
You should do a comparison including gamepass version as well!
Installed only Warzone on Xbox App, works better as well compared to steam, good if you don't really wanna install battlenet
forsure
And after years watching you its still amazing. 😎
i had this same problem with God of War on steam. It was literally unplayable constant stutters and some times freezing and dropping to 0 frames. Bought it on epic and played without any problems. I've never had that problem with steam before. I was running a 4070 ti super at the time.
nah fr i had played God of War via "alternative means" on pc before i bought it on steam and it performed like 20% worse on steam
@@OrenSaidAThing Don't forget DRM, Denuvo for exemple is ruinning game perf. When you play by "alternative means" your PC don't tank the DRM.
Peace
@@OrenSaidAThing It's crazy. I looked into it and people were saying to turn different things off like the overlay. Did all of that and nothing changed. it's making me buy games away from steam now
Interesting iv had god of war on steam since it came out and iv never had issues. I have a 3070 and always got 60 plus fps max settings at 1440 p.
@@OrenSaidAThing crazy how sailing the high seas has better performance than the actual game
Amazing Video!! Thank you for letting us know the difference
Glad it was helpful!
Man, now we have to worry about what launcher we're playing games from? This future is so lame lol.
The issue is that in steam you need to change the voice chat to something else than all lobby.
This fixes the fps .
Issue is: all lobby + steam = low fps
Change it to "Friends only."
This is actually true. I did this disabled voice chat and I got fps increase I dont know how they fuck up cod optimisation so much
doesn't completely fix the whole problem. something else is broken there too. and it's not a real fix but just a patch
@@fudeboii yea that is true but iv seen fps increase after disabling voice. I dont know what else could it be.
@@sarahmonalisa3057
yep, I also struggled with this problem when urzikistan didn't run 5800x3d 4070ti only 80fps (220fps when less than 20 players alive endgame) voice settings when you turn it off it was somewhat playable anyway. hope they fix it soon. it would be nice to be able to play +170fps from the beginning of the game
You grabbed my attention by the notification only😂
Not sure if this is the issue here (doesn't really seem like it since CPU usage is also much higher on Battle Net which wouldn't happen with Frame Gen) but there's a bug where FSR Frame Gen secretly enables by default (happened to me and many others) and obviously boosts frame rates by quite a bit.
You have to go to campaign, enable FSR upscaling and then Frame Gen appears toggled on, and it does affect the other modes even though it's only in the campaign.
is the option still there? i cant find it
@@wrench No, its not there anymore. You have to go into the config file to change it now.
The greatest benchmarker that has ever lived
Glad you think so!! Thank you🥰🥰
I think Steam version has a voice chat bug that causes low fps, if you set it to party or friends only it fixes it
no, ingame voice chat taxes frames so if you turn it on battlenet version it cuts frames a bit as well but there is something else in the background
It was turned off!
It doesn't all the way - shutting off voice chat gets more frames, yes, but 100+ fps differences people are seeing isn't from that alone.
I'm confused here. How does that play a factor in frames?
@@GetsugaTensho33because this game's code is a completely mess
Great video as always thank you for the clarification. Even though I'm on a low end laptop, the comparison still stands. The differences are more noticeable on my platform because of the lack of playability before, and the now actual playable difference. Goes from 15 minutes of hell to at least a couple hours of decent gaming. I just like this game and it's frustrating not to be able to play it freely.
Isn't the steam version bugged with regards its proximity audio still? It was like this in the past also, and many players have reported it with this new version, especially with the steam version.
To "Fix" it, go to Settings -> Audio -> Voice Chat -> and put Game Voice Channel to Party Only, after that turn Voice Chat off! (This is obviously not a fix, but is a workaround)
Other have had success with disabling resizable BAR, but its hard to know if thats legit, as the gains are not as large as reported from the first "fix". (For context, MW3 era WZ also ran better on may systems with rebar disabled)
No. Steam have caused many many games with stuttering and low fps or halved fps.
@@steffdia7080 I get 140 fps at 1440p with low textures with a 7900xtx🤦♂
disabling resizable bar will reduce performance
Yes that solved my issue. I am at 200 fps now & was at like 110 be for this change
@@m0n4rch_y thx man !
I was here for the experience on launch day. I was so confused and looked on RUclips, there was one video abt the party chat feature and THATS WAS ALL THE INFO at the time, now everyone knows abt the fps drop, crazy how a bug took 2-3 weeks to go viral lol
Kryzzp, stalker tomorrow :)
Yessir!!!
I even took a leave of absence from work tomorrow to play it) im from Ukraine and so hapy to play it)
@@FotiToti О котрій годині буде доступна?
@@Ruslan-Night 18:00 Kyiv
@@WolfChen 🤞 головне оптимізація
This guys the best at testing the things we really wanna see
Glad you did a retest Kryzzp :))
I noticed this a while back. Halo Infinite was doing the same for me for a while. Ran higher frames from the xbox app BUT the game crashed more on me from the app so I dealt with lower frames and played from steam. It was only about a 10-15% difference for halo for me though.
This difference is insane and honestly should be seen as unacceptable.
PC Gamepass version also is broken like steam. RTX 3070 barely holds 60 at 1440p High at native resolution. Beta had no issues getting 90-100 on the same settings
I have a 4070 Ti Super and 7800X3D and run 1440p native high with fidelity cas at 170-200 fps. With game pass PC.
Game pass works better for me, I had cod on steam since mw2 and in s1 was getting only 50fps in battle royale but I switched for gamepass on xbox app and now having like 80-90 fps in Urzykistan and 110-120 fps on resurgence. I have rtx3060ti and ryzen5 3600 and same native 1440p resolution.
@@gtsmoke1012 It appears to be all over the place lol. Recent updates seemed to of helped my performance some. Gained about 10-20fps randomly.
@@A-a-ron01220 I play on game pass and this new update with the new zombies map made the fps worse for me by about 10 fps with the exact same settings and its just less stable
I remember when overwatch 2 came to steam, I swapped over to it for like a month and a half because I just wanted to track the hours on game. I randomly went back to bnet launcher and was SHOCKED at how much smoother it felt. I don't keep my fps on since i get well over 400+ all the time so I can't say for sure if Steam lowered it or just had worse 1% lows but playing on a 360hz monitor I could just tell instantly how much better bnet felt
does this still happen?
Your talking about a company who charges money for better audio so I wouldn't be surprised if they did this to try and move more ppl into their algorithm.
Thank you Kryzzp so much for this video!!! I didn’t think you would get this out so fast but once again you prove yourself as my favorite benchmarker!! ❤❤❤
Hope you enjoyed it! Thanks mate 😃
Have you tried disabling steam overlay?
I unfortunately have steam I disabled the steam overlay the game bar overlay and the nvidia overlay and the game still runs like dog shit I went to the Xbox version and fixed all my issues
Today you win! that's actually a very big difference, keep your amazing benchmarks as always.
I would be interested to see how it runs when launched from the pc xbox app/gamepass.
@@NothingWorksNow this. I feel like my 4080 is not doing its job on the gamepass version
@@GodisFrisky 100 precent! have the same, have to tweak so much just to feel satisfied. I think the gamepass version is getting the same results as steam..
@ is it just for warzone or normal game? I feel like my GPU is lacking in normal multiplayer and zombies
@@GodisFrisky Same.. MW3 I was locked at 165hz at all times. Boot up this game on gamepass and it constantly drops frames and gpu utilization plummets like the game is artificially limiting the performance
@@gman3563 we need a benchmark for this. Come on kryzpy
for me in battle net the performance for the big map and area 99 is still very bad, lost about 70fps compared to pre integration. On rebirth i have those fps back though - there the performance is great 🫡 this just shows how bad the state of urzikstan and area 99 is regarding performance .. hope for
some improvements there
how are you playing rebirth when they took it out of the game?
@ its back again - unless they removed it today again for some reason
Hey Kryzzp can you test Alan Wake 2 with maxed-out settings on RTX 4090?
Hi! Yes I'll do it eventually :)
I finally decided to just try the Battlenet version after playing on Steam since last season of Warzone. Let's just say that Battlenet made my game run 100% better. 60+ fps gains in some heavy areas is insane! I feel like it is as smooth as the old map now. Wow! (7800x3d and 4070super on Win 11 Version 10.0.22631 Build 22631)
i always wanted a 4090, but seeing people who have one only getting 200+ fps and i get 200+ with my 7800xt in 1440p on bo6 for more or less quarter of the price made me rethink my decision!
Warzone is more cpu demanding than bo6
Because most people with an RTX 4090 will be using 4K displays. You can't compare 1440p with 4K and then assume you made a better purchasing decision, because the RTX 4090 will significantly outperform the 7800 XT at the same resolution.
1440p 4k literally about 100% difference.
@@foggy922 no not at all im going by the people ive seen with one, they are in 1440p and thats what im comparing to i didnt mention the difference in 4k did i.. i did say in 1440p
not doubting the fact its a beast in 4k and im not comparing my gpu to 4k.. my gpu doesnt come close to the 4090
This is why I have bought every COD since BO4 on BattleNet
rather not buy cod at all if this is how they treat paying customers
@ I actually didn’t buy this one for once! And Im sticking to that, but im just going off of the free trial right now. I played the Beta and now the free trial. If it hits like $30 I might buy it but I’ll never get that deal lol
Perhaps turning off the Steam Overlay for it might help? After all, there's a slight chance that Activision isn't deliberately pushing a worse version to Steam...
is that all u have to do?
no way an overlay would cause that much of a drop
@@Griffith74 The Steam overlay has always been quite heavy on resources and has gotten even heavier now that it has automatic background recording on by default.
Tried it and it made no difference.
thanks brooo, you're amazing 💖
Does using the XBOX app as the launcher cause differences in performance?
I’m wondering the same thing, if I get more fps just for buying the game then so be it I guess lmao
KRISPYY I JUST WATCHED YOUR MSI AFTERBURNER SETUP TUTORIAL
i liked it ❤
I have a rtx 4070 super and I'm playing in 1080p with only 90-100fps on steam , activision must fix this! It's CRAZY !!!
They won't fix it. I'm gonna push for a refund
I am getting 80-90 at 1440p on a 3070 with some dlss
I’m glad I haven’t even gotten it yet I’ll get it on battlenet soon
5800x3d+6800xt 1080p 140-160fps, but on MWIII Warzone was been 200-240 fps😁
@@Carrion-0409 This shit was been in WZ Almazra. True, there was not such a drop in FPS, it was only minus 20 FPS, now it’s about minus 100 FPS.
will you test Stalker 2? the game is in gamepass :) Great Video!
I will!
@@zWORMzGamingPwease test between 4060, 3060ti or 2080 super since these have almost same performance and most people on steam use 3060ti
I actually thought I was going crazy bc I knew my rig should be doing more frames, swapped to battlenet today and the performance increase is crazy. it’s scummy but I’m glad to see my frames where they should be.
As neroscinema once said, "FOUR YEARS TREYARCH, 4 YEARS!!!!!!"
How have they done this??????😭
Warzone is handled more by Raven, not Treyarch.
@ sorry for the late reply but even bo6 multiplayer has some problems, my 13700k cant even get 200 fps in most scenarios even though it was getting 270fps in cpu bound scenarios in mw3
If you set the voice chat to: private only. It will give you more fps
It was off in both tests :)
@@zWORMzGaming even if was turned off before BIG update you need to turned it ON and turn OFF. Yea it's dumb but it a bit fixed performance for 4080 and 5800x3d.
It's still need to be fixed anyway
I"ve noticed the same thing with PUBG. Running it in steam with 140-50 fps, then running it in EPIC launcher with 180-90 fps.
Shot in the dark here;
check if steam is recording the gameplay in the background, they recently added that to steam. not sure what the default settings are but perhaps also encoding said recording on the CPU rather than GPU.
It’s not on by default. But I will also say I’ve tested it a lot and only get around 5-10 fps difference with a 3080 10gb and 7800x3d with the bit rate at the highest available. No noticeable difference over shadowplay from my testing.
Plus that wouldn't explain a massive 100fps difference, when I record gameplay I lose maybe 8-15 fps max.
@@hypnotickiller4802 Yes because it's likely being encoded using GPU. Not saying I know for sure the FPS would drop that much if encoding on CPU but it's something to consider.
Crazy i went with your exact settings on my 7900xt and it gives me 160-185 FPS at 4k. I am really impressed since it was 590€ and isnt too far behind the 4090 if you think it is 300% the price
If you use extreme settings the houses and building won't load properly on the steam version
Good video bro, missed the microsoft store or xbox gamepass version on pc.
Did u have steam overlay, steam input and steam recording off?
all those won't make a 100fps difference
AMAZING BENCH MARK VIDEO!!
You should test the Xbox Game Pass version
someone did, it's basically the same as bnet version
@@finafina1504 Oh ok, cool!
Could you try changing the voice settings to party only and voice chat off on steam version, You get a big FPS boost when you do.
7:55 you would be surprised on what activion does on purpose.. they r allways doing shiii like that over the last few years
I saw a comment saying that Xbox and Battle Net default to using FSR 3 Frame Interpolation, which is why there's such a big difference in frame rates.
Looking forward to the 4080 super test on warzone 😊
This has been an issue since Warzone 2 first launched. Can’t believe it still isn’t fixed yet.
This apply to Multiplayer too? Since release i'm getting really bad performance with a 4080 and 13700K...
shouldnt have bought a intel cpu
It doesn’ t! I was shocked when I saw this and went buying a battlenet version as well, i already own a steam version. I tried two matches and requested a refund. Performance was exactly the same.
I have a 13700k and a 4080 also, in MP I get around 250 fps (240hz panel) but the performance on zombies is dogshit
@@hypnotickiller4802 7800x3d and 7900xtx on steam and i can play zombies with well over 200 fps on high, only the bug map warzone has bad performance for me
For science, please do this comparision with the fastest AMD card you own.
Ill be sending a bunch of these videos to valve support when i request a refund. Edit: it seems like steam is offering refunds for the game if you link them videos about this issue since i just got mine. Please if you are having issues get a refund and hit activision in the wallet. This is the last cod game I buy after this.
but steam have only 7 days refund?
@@brettjlim it seems that theyre being more lax about that policy due to the issues in black ops 6 on steam
Ima try this
@@IsThattCappo it worked for me
@@brettjlim14 days. And they do make exceptions.
For whatever reason disabling resize bar was the fix for me on the steam version. This was the first time I purchased call of duty on steam and will likely be the last
Disabling resizable bar worked for me too. Maybe you should do a comparison between config files - has to be a setting that is different between Steam and Battlenet.
Hi how did u do this? Pls help
@ boot into BIOS and disable above 4g encoding or look for the resize bar option in ez mode and turn it off
@kenopangilinan4286 it's a setting in the bios (very easy to do)
I always knew shit like this will happen with games that have seperate launchers on steam, they want you on their shit launcher so they don't pay steam that 30% cut😂
your reply makes the most sense
genuinely what’s wrong with the battle net launcher. i have 0 issues using it
Its literally bugged but whatever
@@Johnny91832 Likely story 🤓
What kind of future are we in. Now not only do we have to worry if its a PC ports, now we got platform launcher ports to worry about!?
120 FOV actually provides more frames it dynamically lowers the texture quality in game of the farther away things and provides a FPS boost
it could be a thing my game feels a bit better with fov 120
It's not textures, textures mostly have an impact on VRAM usage. It's level of detail, aka LOD that's the problem. Higher FOV results in lower polygon count in stuff far away resulting in better FPS.
What about xbox pc app?
Steam overhead may include the clip/capture recording it does. I think it’s enabled by default. Check if it’s on in the Steam options.
Good though but it is not that. It was off completely and I still saw an 60+ fps gain on Battlenet over steam. Overlay off and voice chat off too. Strange enough, they use the same config file when launched too.
i recommend you to use the AMD Fidelity CAS at 80% as sharpener instead of the NVIDIA Image Scaling, its much sharper and gets slightly better fps than the nvidia scaler on native
the reason for high cpu usage is because fsr frame gen is on by default on the game to turn it off you have to edit the config file in mw3 when having it enabled it had both gpu and cpu maxed out instead of gpu mainly being maxed or if on a weaker gpu cpu being maxed out reason for steams performance could be steam pulling recourses or that call of duty is not optimized well on it
I cant believe this my friend went and bought a cpu thinking his pc is the problem it is so cheesy that their doing that
they prob do it on purpose so you go buy a new cpu or gpu, and they get kickbacks
@@NvyZero no but because they have to pay steam a certain % of their sales on the game so they just make the game better on their own launchers so they can make more money
“Cheese”
this is just the tip of the iceberg for steam if you enable voice chat you lose an aditional 30% FPS
Steam need to explain that
This isn't steam fault, activision are the scum here
steam only distributes the game, they have no influence on the game
@@Gustaviustwinkelberryyeah activision….
@@Gustaviustwinkelberrythey definitely deserve to get bankrupted
crazy how this still is not fixed xd
is that only on warzone or black ops 6 multiplayer as well?
no there is a new nuketown themed one for resurgence
The intentional low performance is amazing
Terrible performance like always from CrashZone
Terrible on steam!*
day 11 trying to reach 100k subs just by responding to random comments 💀
its only on steam on batllenet ol normal
Nice one.. Im glad im on battlenet with my 4070....
How much does it give you on battle royal map
ryzen 7 5700x 4070 here 110 fps max on low setting on xbox app disgusting game
@@K.A-87 i downloaded the game throught battle net i get 230fps on normal settings ryzen 7 7700 4070 super
@@dimastorres5105 whaaaaattttttttt i bought the 4070 yesterday and mine is getting 110 fps on low wtf man i almost wanted to bring the card back the problem is the xboxapp then
@@K.A-87 Welp somethings causing you issues, i've been getting between 180-220 on xbox app on normal/high settings with a ryzen 7 5800x and a rtx 4060.
this game is even worse cheating is insane online games is dead since 2020 sadly appreciate the hell out of your videos best benchmark and video cards reviewer in RUclips
man i love that i bought it on steam its playable but me being able to go from 90 up to probably around 130 😭 with a 3060
i could up my distance graphics so much then
The 1% lows are higher on Battlenet than the average performance on Steam. Maybe even higher than the highest peak I saw on steam? That is crazy
I do believe that it is due to steam taking more ram and running with high resources in background so in this case it is a good thing battle net did for their users :)
I noticed a 100W less gpu power consumption though, so maybe steam puts a limitation on power drawn, which explains the performance difference
I was a decent steam warzone player . But by the time it goes the game got hard . So I tried the Asia server of warzone . I just tried battle net for the hardness . But also noticed that yes the performance has also improved
I can't belive that this can't be that huge
what a bizarre bug, seems like steam is limiting gpu/cpu utilization? can't even begin to imagine what would cause this bug based on platform
It's still pretty crappy in terms of optimisation even on Battlenet. My GPU runs at an average of around 62%, power limit occasionally hit, about 30FPS less and temps about 5 degrees down from usual. They did the same with MW3/WZ3 integration and it took them about 3 seasons to sort out - almost like they've just reset all the optimisations back to the beginning.
In the morning before the WZ4 switch I was getting 90-95% GPU load average, power limit on all the time (as it should be) and runnning about 30-35FPS more - after the switch I was running 55% GPU load so they have improved it a little but still sucks. Intrigued you're getting GPU load in the high 90's....
I confirm. I play Dine Light 1 and 2, and in the Steam version Dine Light 1 is 140-160, on the pirate version it’s over 220; in Dine Light 2 it’s exactly the same - there are fewer frames than on the pirate version
Hey man, can you please test even the xbox Launcher? Nice video as aslways
Hi!
Oof I hate that launcher, probably not gonna test it 🤣
Thanks!
@@zWORMzGaming on it all fine like batllenet
@@zWORMzGaming i Always use It because of game pass, but i Just Remembered that if you launch COD It opens Battle net
@@needlesswaif1773Nope it doesn't
I think its because on steam you can leave reviews and they don't want Intel CPUs crashing, I noticed that on my 13900k is limited to 100fps and the CPU Time is stuck at 10, if you enable the HUD CPU Time is 10 all the time, so artificially limited by CPU frametime
OMG thank you! I downloaded the game a few days ago from Steam and I had 60 FPS on the lowest settings with a 5700x3d 1660Super. I know it's not a great GPU and only 6gb but I know I should definitely get higher frames
Yea I’m on a rx580 8g 2048 lol an it’s far better than that. I see 130 average and a lot of times much more. At 1080p it’s a beater with a graphics card but I still play hard on it
Interesting, I noticed you have the X3D 16 core cpu, maybe the amd driver for core parking is borked with the steam runin wz? might be interesting to test with a non 3d cpu
I disabled the non 3D cores to prevent that!
My 9800x3d and strix 3090oc gets like 82 fps with dlss on performance in Warzone. That is absolutely insane
It's pretty weird... Some Time ago i also had the same problem with Heroes & Generals... The standalone client ran perfectly fine back in the days with 90FPS on my good old R9 280X and the Steam Version ran with only 60-70FPS.😂
Hey I know you tested Ark survival Ascended about a year ago and the game ran pretty bad, but they a released an optimization patch a few months ago. May be worth a test since ark is known as the GPU killer.
Lets just hope for a quick fix or at least explanation of this...
My man has Bad Company 2 installed. Respect.
Awesome game... Most fun I've had in a MP game 🙂
Steam causing fps issues is not evens surprising to me. Black Ops 3 before the new steam updates was golden, I was able to keep 200 fps with a GTX 970, now I can barely even hit 200 on the same settings with an RX 5700 XT. My game stutters a lot since I don't have campaign or dead ops arcade installed.
Hey, someone finally heard my comment! (I think lol)
By the way, this issue has existed since 2022 (MW2)
Please tomorrow try every single video card on S.T.A.L.K.E.R 2 many people were waiting after 15 years to play it but the Nvidia video benchmark used DLSS 3 with no info what card they used which confused us even more, and they updated the specs list again so I hope you keep eye on it and benchmark it on many cards I always appreciate your hard work and I love this channel