I wondered about H and Ms kids. THEY are a very dysfunctional family! I really pity their children. As they grow older they will see how healthy families live!!!!
I have no interest in seeing Harry’s invisible kids and I refuse to call his daughter by the late Queen’s name. I don’t want to hear about Harry’s kids until they grow up and write their own books betraying their parents and telling us how awful they are as parents for keeping them so isolated and family-free all their lives. My father did the same with us for 20 years with his family and it caused a lot of unnecessary pain on all sides.
We don’t care whether they say they have kids or not. They didn’t come from her body so they mean nothing to us. Why would we bother with kids rented from Central Casting when we have the Wales’ 3 beautiful children & the Tindall’s children to watch grow up. Any photo she produces will be photoshopped anyway, they always are !
And don't forget the brother of M said she should NEVER be left alone with small children and animals . The hand that rocks the cradle gives me the creeps .
The gaslighting never ends with the dishonest duo. They’ve not only done it to the general public, but to almost Harry’s entire family, from his grandmother on down. Disgraceful despicable and desperate.
Don't care about their inviskids, the 3 Wales children Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis are the future of the Royal Family, gorgeous happy well loved children of William and Catherine
Seen in public and never exploited! People respect and keep appropriate distance from the children, why do the Harles feel their children warrant so much interest?
If the pregnancies are proven to be fake, they should be charged with fraud because they are intentionally deceitful so that they can be in LOS which is a constitutional Monarchy , not a private family firm. Not be brushed off as “ mischief “ .
How can she be a mother if she haven't got a womb. If Harry as children they wouldn't be allowed to be called to be called princess and prince, there classed as bastards because they wasn't borne of Megan. If they produce the children I would want DNA on the four of them. There's no legal birth certificate on the children. Fact
If they want to keep them secret....fine. personally, I don't want to see them. Keep them secret and safe, no problem, just stop telling such stupid lies about them.
As American 🇺🇸 i will never 👎 recognize " merchie " and "little Betty " As prince or princess, we see the real royal children, and the world has fallen in love with them 👍🏻
This American agrees! We watched William grow up to be a fine man, marry well and produce adorable heirs. Who cares about that one and his tart, let alone their fictitious kids?
I'm very glad you're speaking about this, Neil. If the children exist, i don't care if i never see them. Regardless of their titles, i don't consider them as royals.
@GlendaJones-yk5lw If it were Tudor times, the King could take their titles. However, now, there's a constitutional monarchy, and he doesn't have that power. The late Queen gifted them their titles, but it would take an Act of Parliament to remove them. The King is not gutless. He has been doing a great job, but he does not have the power to remove titles. I wish, like you, that they had no titles, but even if they were removed, there would be consequences. Haz and the Meg would just keep going on their victim rampage. As a son of the monarch, he is a prince. He will always be a prince. If he were not a Duke, he'd still be Prince Harry, and she would be Princess Henry / Harry. Both you and I know that she would call herself Princess Meghan. There's no law in America to stop her calling herself that, unless she attains public office. In conclusion, there's no actual benefit in removing their titles. While it would appease those calling for the title removal, Haz and the Meg are loose cannons and will call themselves what they want.
@@GlendaJones-yk5lw Please don't call our King gutless, he may not do what you want but that doesn't make him gutless, he is our King and a lot of us love and respect him
I really don’t care about Harry and Meghans so called children. The three Wales children are the future of the Royal family Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis are being brought up Royal.Beautiful children.🙏
How can we be expected to be interested we havnt seen them so they can't expect the people to fund them they arnt here if and when they are over then I'm sure kc111 will sort it out as the GB is not racist but don't like being ruled off and given nasty comments like you have made plain ,, how you saw us as a money pot we have to work and so do you H&mm we can't afford you and you're ridiculous amount of spending and you have loads of millions si pay for youreself
Why is the simpleton prince fighting for security for children that clearly never leave their house. As for the ‘someone is lying’ question, there is no question about who the someone’s are.
@@lornashadbolt4189 They want it to cover Doria, too. Allegedly They don’t care about security, they need the protection IPP status gives against criminal charges. Think of all the reasons the 3 of them need that!
The public has a right to know about these 2 "phantom" children. We've seen different faces, different colored hair. More recently, the back and side of their faces. No birth certificates. No legal documentation. Yet they have royal titles AND are in the LOS. Time for THE TRUTH.
The more you hide something the more curious people become. They are so stupid ...if the kids exist that is. Anyway Archieficial will be going to school soon ...they can't hide kids forever..again, if there are any ...😮
The only children I care about are our beautiful George, Charlotte and Louis. Their parents have always shown us lovely pictures from time to time, it is a pleasure to watch them growing into lovely little adults. ❤
This drama is cuckoo. Please King Charles, honor the Monarchy. Your son Harry will be fine…as long as he wears a seatbelt. William and Catherine will help set things stable and positive , be proud of him especially now 🙏
Its going to be their greatest story...money money...the children will only be 'seen if and when they can purchase suitable actors. Theres always going to be desperate people who will go along with such stories for money. I personally think when the heat really goes on...like the expiration of gag orders...and failed attempts to obtain ipp status for protection...they will create a tragedy that makes the kids disappear. Sad...but its the only way to get out of the lies if they can't rent actors. The people who know can't speak because of privacy laws . In a perfect world a billionaire could offer an ex housekeeper or driver all expenses paid legal cover to tell the truth and not worry about gag orders...but then their life would be made hell either way. If the Royals spoke out...Harry will pull the biggest tantrum resulting in hurting himself so he makes himself the victim all over again. Its a nobody wins situation. Narcissists suck. They get away with unthinkable ludicrous things.
The couple have not displayed genuine birth certificates in London or Santa Barbara; have no hospital receipts for the dates they claimed; nor are there respected attending physicians, who have provided sworn testimony that the births occurred from Harry's wife's body. (P.S. The child used as "Archie" in S. Africa, and for the first birthday video, reading on Harry's wife's lap, was actually the second, dearly loved, child of a former Water Polo buddy of Harry's, who lovingly filmed the event while visiting the deceptive couple. The child lives w/family, in the capital city of a different country, not in the U.K., U.S., Africa, or a Commonwealth Country, and they're fairly high profile and very respected people). However, on the African trip, the mum, also brought her firstborn daughter, a year older than her second child, and all travelled with Harry and wife. It was her second child that was posed as Harry's and wife's baby, "Archie."
That almost happened to Eugenie. After the German Invictus Games they stopped at the home of Eugene & her family. Mm desperately wanted to see her new child. Eugene refused to see the dastardly duo multiple times. Mm wanted pictures so she could post them as her child. IMHO. So they left without any pictures. At least Eugene showed some good sense.
Yep that's what they'll do..when they were pictured at the July 4th independence day parade with children they never actually said it was Archificial and Lilibucks people just assume its them so there's no record of them saying it's their invisible children 😮they think everybody is stupid
We have the wonderful Wales children, Prince George Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis. It's been delightful watching them grow into very polite and kind and charming children, but then they do have The Prince and Princess of Wales William and Catherine as parents who are Very hands on with their lovely children ❤❤❤
Invisible kids. Moon bumps. We all saw a moonbump hit the ground at Birkenhead. We ALL saw the photos so please don’t insult our intelligence. When are YOU going to call this out..
@@teamev1976it’s on the internet. Why don’t you look it up. You must be the only one who hasn’t seen it, or better still there are a couple of compilations out that are just of her “pregnancy” with the boy. Once you’ve watched that you’ll be as certain as we are that she was NEVER pregnant
@@teamev1976 HD Tudor last week video. Nice montage of pictures. In one the moon bump visibly left the waist area( waist became slim) and is between her knees. The title Why has the press not queried the pregnancies?
I Agree.. Maybe Harry's? Not her. Must of been surrogate.If proven to be right.. Then kids obviously No longer Titled.. Or succession.. And who were the Doctors, midwife or Nurses. NOBODY HAD EVER seen MM at the Hospitals. No Paparazzi shots in & out of cars.. NOTHING..???
There’s a video from before the Jubilee, showing our lovely late Queen greeting two gentlemen from the military, they had to approach her because, as she said herself ‘I can’t move’, we know she had to cancel many planned meetings because she had mobility problems and she was in pain, there’s no way she could have travelled back and forth to Frogmore Cottage. Just another tall tale from the Sussex camp 😊
Since Meghan didn't bring Archie and Little Betty to the UK during the Queens's Jubilee, that means she missed Little Betty's 1st birthday. Some mother she is😂
That photograph at the cottage is very strange. The little girl is sitting on his neck and not his shoulders her weight would have forced his neck forwards, his neck would not have been able to stay upright and would have restricted his breathing.The little boy appears to be supported with one arm only with his legs just dangling, he would have wrapped his legs around her waist for support and to support him she would have placed her hand under his bottom to hold him up. Very strange indeed.
Good for you-- Neal you are the ONLY reporter who tries to be truthful about the "children" and the duplicity of the Harkles. Applaud your honesty and integrity.
Apparently, even the staff at the airport said there were no children on the plane. As for the Frogmore Cottage photo. I remember someone commenting that it was photo-shot, bc the children have never come over to England. So, how could there be a photo of them there?
That photo of Harold pushing an EMPTY pram!! Lil Betty got left behind 😂 All the children they did show in their Flopumentry belonged to other people!! They will never bring them because they don’t exist!! That’s why they did a runner to America 🇺🇸
@@isabelwright8910yes if they had stayed in the UK they wouldn't have been able to hide the invisible children for very much longer. I wondered if they were told to front up should the lack if child or get out, so they got out very abruptly causing mayhem
She hasnt been offered a big enough check yet ❗️. A freinds cousin works at FARMBOROUGH AIRPORT and NO CHILDREN GOT OFF OR LEFT BY PLANE DURING THE QUEEN'S JUBILEE ❗️SO THERE WAS NO CHILDREN TO GET A PICTURE WITH THE QUEEN 👑
I don’t care about those children , William and Catherine have three beautiful children who we love and see that’s all we need , so the harkles need to go away we are not interested to late ..
It’s all will they won’t they , a load of rubbish, not wort the paper it’s printed on . I will never forgive the pain he cause for his grandmother and grandfather as they where dying, UN FORGIVABLE !!!!!
No one cares about the kids, if there is kids, we don't know who's kids they are. Now, who cares, but the kids are all they have left, to try and stay relevant, but it is way to late!!!
@@estherlutz3358... only trouble is Those grifters could show any photos of ANY kids...And the public wouldn't know if they were the real kids or not?. Probably wouldn't believe those liars anyway!. Too late now!!😢
I have to agree. The duo have made such an issue about the "children" that many no longer care. We have three precious children to dote on and fuss over. The Wales children! 😊
Does ANYONE really give a 💩 about those kids (?) ? The world has access to the ones that really count and are Beautiful, Cheeky, and Mannered 😊. Those are going to be a one hit wonder like their parents, when they decide to sell them to the press for the big paycheck.
True prince William and princess Catherine the future king and queen’s children are the only ones I care seeing ore hearing about. I could care less if I ever see or hear about Harry and hags spawn.
It is like a gingerbread house, and it's so lovely! Few care about Archie and Lilibet! They have been hidden for too long, and we have the Wales children via watching them grow up from their proud parents introducing them to us on the steps of the hospital to the present. As to that birthday party for Lilibet - Markle claimed that Zara and Mike were there with their children. And, Mike and Zara were out of town with Princess Anne! All that said, I don't believe there is an Archie nor a Lilibet. I think for whatever reason this has been the biggest lie/scam in Royal Family history.
They also claimed that Archie Fakes christening was carried out by the Bishop of Los Angles, who has said that he was not in Calafornia at the time.They also claimed that Dianas two sisters attended, in the christening picture, the two sisters have been photoshopped into, as there is no reflection of the two in the wall mirroe behind them.Earl Spencer produced the events book for Slthorpe, which showd that the sisters were there on the day of the supposed christening.Yet more lies.
Just noticed something. All of those “birthday “ photos were supposed to be the same day. Harry goes from wearing a light short sleeve white shirt, to a heavier long sleeve shirt. Even MM skirt is not the same. One has pleats and the other does not. Although..she does tend to change her clothing quite frequently, but usually a bit more dramatically.
That woman was never pregnant 🤰 she had to use someone, I've been around a lot of pregnant women, and she did moves no other women has ever been able to do. And there is plenty of video showing her going down to her knees when she was supposed to have been seven months not possible.
@@stephanieknowles7586 Maybe, but they don't last forever. As I understand it they cannot be used to cover a criminal act. Putting fake, non existent or surrogate or adopted kids, not born of the body, in OUR Line of Succession is treason, a criminal offence. Hope someone has the courage to expose this.
They don’t go along with it, they just ignore it. That said it is a very tricky subject to approach. I think someday we will just see where the family has been taken out of the line of succession. The RF will not want to make a big deal of it because they know what people will do with it…..oh, the drama.
@@elizabethbesco4758at such an important event as a birth affectng LOS there would be impeccable documents of birth with absolutely well known and trusted attendees verifying all is legit. There would be no wink wink the RF trusts your word without many checks and balances. Any casualness by the RF would be inexcusable and pilloried by the media and the British public.
Misan Harriman the photographer, the lady with 2 kids, is his wife. The girl in MM arms is named Hardford Clark. Beau Clark and Stacey daughter. Misan photoshop the kids..allegedly. there was no birthday party in UK..
I wonder if Harry’s neighbours have ever seen these children. I am sure the Queen wasn’t well enough to be trotting around,so that is a big lie from them.👋👋👋 always waving back,🇦🇺🦘
It's ludicrous for them to claim Her Majesty stopped by Frogmore to visit her great-grandchildren during her Jubilee. As it was, she was not able to attend several events that weekend due to her ill health. I'm sure her aides and courtiers were very protective of her and made sure she was getting her rest, rather than walking on over to see them. Their facts make for so so fiction, much like his claims in "Spare".
Won't believe there are actually children who are born to these two. Show us pictures of them at different stages, pictures of them playing in their house, at outings out in the public, and DNA tests proving their actual parents!!!
That’s not enough. What is needed is proof of “from the body” of mm. No shame in using a surrogate, except that in England the child would be considered illegitimate. Even their biological children!!!! Parents using a surrogate have to adopt their own children. The dynamic duo didn’t even do that! THIS IS WHY “FROM THE BODY” IS SO IMPORTANT! Any children, even biological children, she would have to deliver from her body! Her father stated that she had a Total Abdominal Hysterectomy in her late 20’s. So she could not have had any child of h’s unless she had also preserved some of her eggs prior to that surgery (which I understand to be so) & h gave some sperm, mix until well blended & place in surrogates uterus. Still illegitimate. Still needs proof of “ from the body” of mm as in she delivered the child. Allegedly
I agree! The way interest in little harrys kids has waned! Pictures that have been put out were just teasers, & people are sick & tired of the nonsense! And now those pictures are old, with others being blurred or the backs of the heads, So how would anyone know if they are really whom they say they are! So now I’m just not even interested! The Wales children have been shown or shared with us as they have grown & it warms people’s hearts to see them from time to time! There’s no guessing games!
I will only refer to her as Betty. The sussex's had no right to use the queens pet name. As far as the queen going back and forth to frogmore cottage.....well, that belongs in Grimms Fairy Tales.
Megan has had 4 holidays this year without the children and it's only the 3rd of March I love being a mum my backside
I wondered about H and Ms kids. THEY are a very dysfunctional family! I really pity their children. As they grow older they will see how healthy families live!!!!
Most people take their kids on holidays. Bad parents or no kids
Totally agree. TOW can't be maternal to go away so many times before March. Even if with Dorito ..but risk of spliffs behind chicken shed...🐓🐤🐤🐥
AND don't forget about 'having this one also ' or something like that 😮
2nd of March on my side of the pond!❤️
I have no interest in seeing Harry’s invisible kids and I refuse to call his daughter by the late Queen’s name. I don’t want to hear about Harry’s kids until they grow up and write their own books betraying their parents and telling us how awful they are as parents for keeping them so isolated and family-free all their lives. My father did the same with us for 20 years with his family and it caused a lot of unnecessary pain on all sides.
Well said.
Yes, it can be called The Tale of my Two Families
She never knows how to hold a child.
@@debrarizzuto7973Never😿
@@debrarizzuto7973I've said the same thing she awkward with them, no way she's aMom.
I am losing interest in the Grifters, and don’t care to see anything of their kids. So very tired of them, only the real Royals.
We don’t care whether they say they have kids or not. They didn’t come from her body so they mean nothing to us. Why would we bother with kids rented from Central Casting when we have the Wales’ 3 beautiful children & the Tindall’s children to watch grow up. Any photo she produces will be photoshopped anyway, they always are !
Yep.
Get a job H!
I agree completely. I'm sick and tired of the Markles and their "kids". Boring.
@@call_it_4nowget little megsy, your boss, to give you a pay rise for your lying bullshit
I do not care about harry, his shameless wife and the fake children.
It must be making you crazy with hate that their union was blessed with two beautiful children.
This gentleman, that speaks on behalf of the Royals, is just Damming his soul to eternal hell. So Sad because he is well paid.❤
The way Harry stole the late queen's nickname to name the his daughter is despicable, unforgivable in my opinion.
No freaking boundaries or respect. He’s been so damned consistent.
One article I read was how Meghan has trademarked the name Lillibet.
Totally tacky.
And stole Prince George’s code name of Archie, too! They had to change his code name then!
They are awful
And don't forget the brother of M said she should NEVER be left alone with small children and animals . The hand that rocks the cradle gives me the creeps .
She is very creepy and shady...
I hadn’t heard that before 😮
@@Silverfern2424 Yes, it's been known a while. I'm sure I heard this more than a year ago.
Yes I worried when I saw a pic of there dog with two broken legs ouch.
The Claw that grasps the Title 😂
No one cares about him or his kids
The gaslighting never ends with the dishonest duo. They’ve not only done it to the general public, but to almost Harry’s entire family, from his grandmother on down. Disgraceful despicable and desperate.
Agree. Me again is a suitable name.
Don't care about their inviskids, the 3 Wales children Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis are the future of the Royal Family, gorgeous happy well loved children of William and Catherine
Seen in public and never exploited! People respect and keep appropriate distance from the children, why do the Harles feel their children warrant so much interest?
Wow interesting!
They’re just children, highly privileged children. Quite ordinary actually.
Not.
The queen was crippled with bone cancer, not dashing round Frogmore.
I thought misleading the public for financial gain was a criminal offence.
It is.
If the pregnancies are proven to be fake, they should be charged with fraud because they are intentionally deceitful so that they can be in LOS which is a constitutional Monarchy , not a private family firm. Not be brushed off as “ mischief “ .
They defrauded anyone who went to baby shower with gifts.
How can she be a mother if she haven't got a womb. If Harry as children they wouldn't be allowed to be called to be called princess and prince, there classed as bastards because they wasn't borne of Megan. If they produce the children I would want DNA on the four of them. There's no legal birth certificate on the children. Fact
they are scamming
No interest in Haz and WalmartWallis fake kids. The only ones that are Royal are PrinceGeorge, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👍🏻👍🏻💯
@@call_it_4nowsugar alert
@AllN2getha OK sugar or is that you methane the witch of you trot oh where are kids none for hire st minute 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
If they want to keep them secret....fine. personally, I don't want to see them. Keep them secret and safe, no problem, just stop telling such stupid lies about them.
Just couldn't care less
When they get in trouble the mullet wrappers will have pics from booking.
There are no natural children from the wife! Therefore they shouldn’t be called Prince or Princes!
And I think they can’t be in the line of succession.
🇦🇺 You can't tell me that the monachy,don't know,and has always known😮
@@ortensiamarra7838 I think they know too, but it will not come out quite yet.
Super injunction against the Royals and all media in the UK.
Definitely knows there no Archie. Never seen a Lilly
As American 🇺🇸 i will never 👎 recognize " merchie " and "little Betty "
As prince or princess, we see the real royal children, and the world has fallen in love with them 👍🏻
So true...Archificial and Invisibet...merchie and lilibucks....little Betty 😂😂 all the aka's are hysterical for the invisible tots.
I couldn’t agree more!
🎯!! Totally agree!! 🇨🇦
totally agree, from the Commonwealth
This American agrees! We watched William grow up to be a fine man, marry well and produce adorable heirs. Who cares about that one and his tart, let alone their fictitious kids?
No interest in Harry's children
A DNA test on Harry would be a start!
Agreed
Amen.
Why?
@sandycplanb5724 if Harry is not King Charles's son it would end all this nonsense - the titles would go.
@@mythoughts7755 of course he is Charles son!
What Children????
What a mystery 😮
No Royal has ever met those children .children shown in photos are other people's children ,no birthday party at frogmore.sad lies..
I'm very glad you're speaking about this, Neil. If the children exist, i don't care if i never see them. Regardless of their titles, i don't consider them as royals.
Not of their parents are "former" royals.
Neither do l and for me they're not royals I wouldn't even call them prince and princess.
They are not royals any of them. Gutless king charles needs to take their title away.
@GlendaJones-yk5lw If it were Tudor times, the King could take their titles. However, now, there's a constitutional monarchy, and he doesn't have that power. The late Queen gifted them their titles, but it would take an Act of Parliament to remove them. The King is not gutless. He has been doing a great job, but he does not have the power to remove titles.
I wish, like you, that they had no titles, but even if they were removed, there would be consequences. Haz and the Meg would just keep going on their victim rampage. As a son of the monarch, he is a prince. He will always be a prince. If he were not a Duke, he'd still be Prince Harry, and she would be Princess Henry / Harry. Both you and I know that she would call herself Princess Meghan. There's no law in America to stop her calling herself that, unless she attains public office.
In conclusion, there's no actual benefit in removing their titles. While it would appease those calling for the title removal, Haz and the Meg are loose cannons and will call themselves what they want.
@@GlendaJones-yk5lw Please don't call our King gutless, he may not do what you want but that doesn't make him gutless, he is our King and a lot of us love and respect him
THERE ARE NO CHILDREN! Just rent a kid. These two make me sick!
Is it legal to rent children?
The children LOOK LIKE their parents. Your post is wishful thinking. You just can't stand it that the couple was blessed with two beautiful kids.
@@stephanieknowles7586 well they in America where there is child trafficking going on
I really don’t care about Harry and Meghans so called children. The three Wales children are the future of the Royal family Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis are being brought up Royal.Beautiful children.🙏
How can we be expected to be interested we havnt seen them so they can't expect the people to fund them they arnt here if and when they are over then I'm sure kc111 will sort it out as the GB is not racist but don't like being ruled off and given nasty comments like you have made plain ,, how you saw us as a money pot we have to work and so do you H&mm we can't afford you and you're ridiculous amount of spending and you have loads of millions si pay for youreself
Well said. The RAVEC court judgment suggests the children were never in the UK for the Jubilee by Harry’s own admission.
Hope that is true!!! and someone prints it in the Times
No one really cares about any of the Markels.
Not a one of them
They have no biological kids
Why is the simpleton prince fighting for security for children that clearly never leave their house. As for the ‘someone is lying’ question, there is no question about who the someone’s are.
Apparently he did not mention his "kids" in his legal plea to the court, only him and wifey. mmm?!!!
@@lornashadbolt4189 They want it to cover Doria, too. Allegedly They don’t care about security, they need the protection IPP status gives against criminal charges. Think of all the reasons the 3 of them need that!
Not to be rude Neil, but I am not interested in their children anymore.
It’s too late to play that card.
The public has a right to know about these 2 "phantom" children. We've seen different faces, different colored hair. More recently, the back and side of their faces. No birth certificates. No legal documentation. Yet they have royal titles AND are in the LOS. Time for THE TRUTH.
The more you hide something the more curious people become. They are so stupid ...if the kids exist that is. Anyway Archieficial will be going to school soon ...they can't hide kids forever..again, if there are any ...😮
@@estherlutz3358so true... they cant hide the invisible kids forever... what are they thinking
It's past time. No way to continue using different rent a kids.
They're not working Royals so no, technically, they are not in the public's interest to know.
@@estherlutz3358 Wait for it. They will he's being home-schooled.
The only children I care about are our beautiful George, Charlotte and Louis. Their parents have always shown us lovely pictures from time to time, it is a pleasure to watch them growing into lovely little adults. ❤
This drama is cuckoo.
Please King Charles, honor the Monarchy.
Your son Harry will be fine…as long as he wears a seatbelt.
William and Catherine will help set things stable and positive , be proud of him especially now 🙏
Do these two know what truth is
NO
How long are Magot and Harold going to keep the lie going about having children?.
Its going to be their greatest story...money money...the children will only be 'seen if and when they can purchase suitable actors. Theres always going to be desperate people who will go along with such stories for money. I personally think when the heat really goes on...like the expiration of gag orders...and failed attempts to obtain ipp status for protection...they will create a tragedy that makes the kids disappear. Sad...but its the only way to get out of the lies if they can't rent actors. The people who know can't speak because of privacy laws . In a perfect world a billionaire could offer an ex housekeeper or driver all expenses paid legal cover to tell the truth and not worry about gag orders...but then their life would be made hell either way. If the Royals spoke out...Harry will pull the biggest tantrum resulting in hurting himself so he makes himself the victim all over again. Its a nobody wins situation. Narcissists suck. They get away with unthinkable ludicrous things.
Some big bombshell is coming in Spring according to Lady C
"Magot" is the BEST descriptive I have seen to date .... BRAVO
Never a child 'lender or borrower' be ... a twist on the old adage. Just sayin'.
Another reason for not believing what the press say. Looks like they can be bought with. Super injunctions.
Who cares about showing us the children!...it's getting pretty boring now.
The children are being raised by their respective surrogates.
Enough of this nonsense.
May Peace be upon us all.
The couple have not displayed genuine birth certificates in London or Santa Barbara; have no hospital receipts for the dates they claimed; nor are there respected attending physicians, who have provided sworn testimony that the births occurred from Harry's wife's body.
(P.S. The child used as "Archie" in S. Africa, and for the first birthday video, reading on Harry's wife's lap, was actually the second, dearly loved, child of a former Water Polo buddy of Harry's, who lovingly filmed the event while visiting the deceptive couple. The child lives w/family, in the capital city of a different country, not in the U.K., U.S., Africa, or a Commonwealth Country, and they're fairly high profile and very respected people). However, on the African trip, the mum, also brought her firstborn daughter, a year older than her second child, and all travelled with Harry and wife. It was her second child that was posed as Harry's and wife's baby, "Archie."
Anything is believable you may have the answer there.
When Harry talked about Archies birth, he did not say Meghan is doing well he said mother and baby
That almost happened to Eugenie. After the German Invictus Games they stopped at the home of Eugene & her family. Mm desperately wanted to see her new child. Eugene refused to see the dastardly duo multiple times. Mm wanted pictures so she could post them as her child. IMHO. So they left without any pictures. At least Eugene showed some good sense.
@@bonnieabrs1003What a freak. The mind boggles.
I don’t know why the RF covers up for them…
That's what I've wondered about!!
@@cricketcustomer2164 yes why? To avoid the head trip and extra work explaining and dodging the details?
They covered up for Harry all his life and they did covered up so more since Harry and Meghan are married, I think they're too deep in it now.
Blackmail by mm i guess
I posted a few months ago that IMO allegegly something very dark has been hidden from the public and enabled MM to blanckmail the RF.
Just like "She never called them racists", when this all comes out, they'll just say "We never said it was our children"
Good one!!!
Yep that's what they'll do..when they were pictured at the July 4th independence day parade with children they never actually said it was Archificial and Lilibucks people just assume its them so there's no record of them saying it's their invisible children 😮they think everybody is stupid
Why is Harry pushing an empty stroller and feeding a doll from an empty bowl?? Do these two ingrates think we are stupid??👺👺😡😡
Who feeds a reclining baby porridge!!!!!!
We have the wonderful Wales children, Prince George Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis. It's been delightful watching them grow into very polite and kind and charming children, but then they do have The Prince and Princess of Wales William and Catherine as parents who are Very hands on with their lovely children ❤❤❤
Invisible kids. Moon bumps. We all saw a moonbump hit the ground at Birkenhead. We ALL saw the photos so please don’t insult our intelligence. When are YOU going to call this out..
👍👍👍👍👍👍
Agreed. Not theirs
I never saw cottage of moon bump hit the ground. Proof? And I’m not a fan on them by the way
@@teamev1976it’s on the internet. Why don’t you look it up. You must be the only one who hasn’t seen it, or better still there are a couple of compilations out that are just of her “pregnancy” with the boy. Once you’ve watched that you’ll be as certain as we are that she was NEVER pregnant
@@teamev1976 HD Tudor last week video. Nice montage of pictures. In one the moon bump visibly left the waist area( waist became slim) and is between her knees.
The title
Why has the press not queried the pregnancies?
She did not give birth to any children in this marriage. Just talk about it already.
I Agree.. Maybe Harry's? Not her.
Must of been surrogate.If proven to be right.. Then kids obviously No longer Titled.. Or succession.. And who were the Doctors, midwife or Nurses. NOBODY HAD EVER seen MM at the Hospitals. No Paparazzi shots in & out of cars.. NOTHING..???
William and Catherine and their absolutely impeccable Children are more than enough for us. Who wants to see Walmart Wallace's Spawns? Not me. 🙄
There’s a video from before the Jubilee, showing our lovely late Queen greeting two gentlemen from the military, they had to approach her because, as she said herself ‘I can’t move’, we know she had to cancel many planned meetings because she had mobility problems and she was in pain, there’s no way she could have travelled back and forth to Frogmore Cottage.
Just another tall tale from the Sussex camp 😊
Since Meghan didn't bring Archie and Little Betty to the UK during the Queens's Jubilee, that means she missed Little Betty's 1st birthday. Some mother she is😂
The con artist always gets exposed in the end.
Pair of charlatans..one brighter than the other ...
Not necessarily!!
That photograph at the cottage is very strange. The little girl is sitting on his neck and not his shoulders her weight would have forced his neck forwards, his neck would not have been able to stay upright and would have restricted his breathing.The little boy appears to be supported with one arm only with his legs just dangling, he would have wrapped his legs around her waist for support and to support him she would have placed her hand under his bottom to hold him up. Very strange indeed.
I remember Mike tyndall say ing there was no birthday party for lily.
Harry and MEghan don't know what the word "truth" means. They think it means "lies".
they will never ever recognise it… only their “truth” exists… sorry I mean their lies…😬🙈. The shady duo 😎😎
It goes beyone truth or lies, at this stage. H&M are living in their own alternate reality. They long ago lost touch with the truth.
TRUTH is a FOREIGN
WORD TO THEM 😆
The only people these two are fooling are themselves.
Good for you-- Neal you are the ONLY reporter who tries to be truthful about the "children" and the duplicity of the Harkles. Applaud your honesty and integrity.
The two children are not mentioned in the Queen’s diary, the meeting is not on her calendar, and the court never heard of it.
Neither Bucking Palace or Clarence House made any announcement of such a meeting taking place, and there was no mention in the Court and Circular.
Apparently, even the staff at the airport said there were no children on the plane. As for the Frogmore Cottage photo. I remember someone commenting that it was photo-shot, bc the children have never come over to England. So, how could there be a photo of them there?
That photo of Harold pushing an EMPTY pram!!
Lil Betty got left behind 😂
All the children they did show in their Flopumentry belonged to other people!!
They will never bring them because they don’t exist!!
That’s why they did a runner to America 🇺🇸
I think that is part of it and the bullying 😂
@@isabelwright8910yes if they had stayed in the UK they wouldn't have been able to hide the invisible children for very much longer. I wondered if they were told to front up should the lack if child or get out, so they got out very abruptly causing mayhem
Finally, getting ready to expose them!
Hope so because this is now beyond a joke 🤬🤬
It just doesn't matter to Americans regarding the children. They are not of royal interest.
Could not care less of this so called family All LIES
She hasnt been offered a big enough check yet ❗️. A freinds cousin works at FARMBOROUGH AIRPORT and NO CHILDREN GOT OFF OR LEFT BY PLANE DURING THE QUEEN'S JUBILEE ❗️SO THERE WAS NO CHILDREN TO GET A PICTURE WITH THE QUEEN 👑
I don’t care about those children , William and Catherine have three beautiful children who we love and see that’s all we need , so the harkles need to go away we are not interested to late ..
Pray for Catherine.
It’s all will they won’t they , a load of rubbish, not wort the paper it’s printed on . I will never forgive the pain he cause for his grandmother and grandfather as they where dying, UN FORGIVABLE !!!!!
Harry and invisible kids should be removed from LOS
Hello, Neil🙋♀🖐 Beautiful cottage!! 💖 It could never be creepy. The only truthful statement she's *ever* uttered: "I'm such a fraud".
Absolutely correct!!!
Once again, Lady P, we agree.
We all know WHO WASN'T BE TRUTH FULL .....THEY ARE LIARS!!!
Their hateful lies need exposed 🤬
Really enjoy seeing the beautiful Wales children, they are a delight.
No one cares about the kids, if there is kids, we don't know who's kids they are. Now, who cares, but the kids are all they have left, to try and stay relevant, but it is way to late!!!
They will merch the ??? Kids pics.?
@@estherlutz3358... only trouble is Those grifters could show any photos of ANY kids...And the public wouldn't know if they were the real kids or not?. Probably wouldn't believe those liars anyway!. Too late now!!😢
Never mind "where's Kate" sugars --- "where's Archie and Betty" ?? oh, that's right, nothing mentioned about that !! 🤣
Its Sad that meghan is going to blame TRF for the baby bumps, and her "needing" to tell this Huge lie! 🙄🤢
Who will believe that?!!!
Those photos were taken at Montecito at the birthday party of Rebecca Cord, the granddaughter of Walmart Wallis' gardener.
Thanks
H&M photoshop soooo many of their pictures, I just don't believe any of them anymore. I truly don't believe they have any real children anymore.
They are not going to bring those kids and Meghan isn't going either. It's publicity like always
Good evening Neil 👋👋👋 I love William and Catherine’s children!❤️❤️❤️ beautiful cottage!
I have to agree. The duo have made such an issue about the "children" that many no longer care. We have three precious children to dote on and fuss over. The Wales children! 😊
Does ANYONE really give a 💩 about those kids (?) ? The world has access to the ones that really count and are Beautiful, Cheeky, and Mannered 😊.
Those are going to be a one hit wonder like their parents, when they decide to sell them to the press for the big paycheck.
True prince William and princess Catherine the future king and queen’s children are the only ones I care seeing ore hearing about. I could care less if I ever see or hear about Harry and hags spawn.
No one cares about them or the kids. They’re delusional thinking by playing games over the children it makes it more interesting. It doesn’t.
Do they have children? I have doubts! They need to be removed from the LOS and the RF website, IMO!
H&M claimed mike and Zara and their children, attended " little Betty's" birthday party , that was a lie to 😂
Yep, and I reckon those photos of them outside Frogmore were shopped and chopped.
Children, what Children
👀
Oooo, what a tangled web they wove.
The only real interest, people have in their kids, is, do they exist.
We all know they are not their kids.
It is like a gingerbread house, and it's so lovely! Few care about Archie and Lilibet! They have been hidden for too long, and we have the Wales children via watching them grow up from their proud parents introducing them to us on the steps of the hospital to the present. As to that birthday party for Lilibet - Markle claimed that Zara and Mike were there with their children. And, Mike and Zara were out of town with Princess Anne! All that said, I don't believe there is an Archie nor a Lilibet. I think for whatever reason this has been the biggest lie/scam in Royal Family history.
I think it's what the harkless wanted . So they could bring the monarchy down. All planned
They also claimed that Archie Fakes christening was carried out by the Bishop of Los Angles, who has said that he was not in Calafornia at the time.They also claimed that Dianas two sisters attended, in the christening picture, the two sisters have been photoshopped into, as there is no reflection of the two in the wall mirroe behind them.Earl Spencer produced the events book for Slthorpe, which showd that the sisters were there on the day of the supposed christening.Yet more lies.
Althorpe, even, the Spencer family home.
i have no interest in seeing their kids and i wish i didn't have to see those 2 ever again
Just noticed something. All of those “birthday “ photos were supposed to be the same day. Harry goes from wearing a light short sleeve white shirt, to a heavier long sleeve shirt. Even MM skirt is not the same. One has pleats and the other does not. Although..she does tend to change her clothing quite frequently, but usually a bit more dramatically.
These rented children seem to be so floppy and generic
Good day Neil😊Meghan wants to wait and charge money to see her kids. She’s a real charm!!
I don’t care if I ever see them!!
Just like a circus side show
Agreed they do have kids they just want the right price
That woman was never pregnant 🤰 she had to use someone, I've been around a lot of pregnant women, and she did moves no other women has ever been able to do. And there is plenty of video showing her going down to her knees when she was supposed to have been seven months not possible.
I dont get why the palace continues to go along with the lies about the kids. Its not going to go down well and for what end result.
Super injunction
@@stephanieknowles7586 Maybe, but they don't last forever. As I understand it they cannot be used to cover a criminal act. Putting fake, non existent or surrogate or adopted kids, not born of the body, in OUR Line of Succession is treason, a criminal offence. Hope someone has the courage to expose this.
They don’t go along with it, they just ignore it. That said it is a very tricky subject to approach. I think someday we will just see where the family has been taken out of the line of succession. The RF will not want to make a big deal of it because they know what people will do with it…..oh, the drama.
@@Grace-tc1lq 💯👍
No birth certificates or dna test then NO CHILDREN
Proof from attending to show born of the body, no documents then no line of sucession.
@@elizabethbesco4758at such an important event as a birth affectng LOS there would be impeccable documents of birth with absolutely well known and trusted attendees verifying all is legit. There would be no wink wink the RF trusts your word without many checks and balances. Any casualness by the RF would be inexcusable and pilloried by the media and the British public.
Have absolutely zero interest in those children now, even if they're ever brought out.
That birthday cake isn’t a cake for a child. It is an adult cake for show. She has no idea about kids.
She never carried or gave birth to those children,
The dam is gonna break.
Misan Harriman the photographer, the lady with 2 kids, is his wife. The girl in MM arms is named Hardford Clark. Beau Clark and Stacey daughter. Misan photoshop the kids..allegedly. there was no birthday party in UK..
If the children do exist then its not their fault they are kept hidden. Bless them. All children should be cared for no matter who they are.
I wonder if Harry’s neighbours have ever seen these children. I am sure the Queen wasn’t well enough to be trotting around,so that is a big lie from them.👋👋👋 always waving back,🇦🇺🦘
🍸♥️👋🏼 I wish Harry and megzie would take the same stance and live that private life.
Nobody cares about there children anymore
It's ludicrous for them to claim Her Majesty stopped by Frogmore to visit her great-grandchildren during her Jubilee. As it was, she was not able to attend several events that weekend due to her ill health. I'm sure her aides and courtiers were very protective of her and made sure she was getting her rest, rather than walking on over to see them. Their facts make for so so fiction, much like his claims in "Spare".
Won't believe there are actually children who are born to these two. Show us pictures of them at different stages, pictures of them playing in their house, at outings out in the public, and DNA tests proving their actual parents!!!
That’s not enough. What is needed is proof of “from the body” of mm.
No shame in using a surrogate, except that in England the child would be considered illegitimate. Even their biological children!!!! Parents using a surrogate have to adopt their own children. The dynamic duo didn’t even do that!
THIS IS WHY “FROM THE BODY” IS SO IMPORTANT! Any children, even biological children, she would have to deliver from her body! Her father stated that she had a Total Abdominal Hysterectomy in her late 20’s. So she could not have had any child of h’s unless she had also preserved some of her eggs prior to that surgery (which I understand to be so) & h gave some sperm, mix until well blended & place in surrogates uterus. Still illegitimate. Still needs proof of “ from the body” of mm as in she delivered the child. Allegedly
Beautiful cottage
I agree! The way interest in little harrys kids has waned! Pictures that have been put out were just teasers, & people are sick & tired of the nonsense! And now those pictures are old, with others being blurred or the backs of the heads, So how would anyone know if they are really whom they say they are! So now I’m just not even interested! The Wales children have been shown or shared with us as they have grown & it warms people’s hearts to see them from time to time! There’s no guessing games!
I understand that there's also no record of the children on the airplane, much less the 'army' of nannies/nurses that M requires to take care of them.
I couldn’t care less if, we never saw them. You don’t miss what you never had. I don’t believe our Queen ever met their daughter either.
I will only refer to her as Betty. The sussex's had no right to use the queens pet name. As far as the queen going back and forth to frogmore cottage.....well, that belongs in Grimms Fairy Tales.