Interview to Profesor Justin Yiu Lin from Peking University

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 июн 2024
  • Professor Justin Yifu LIN is Dean of Institute of New Structural Economics, Dean of Institute of South-South Cooperation and Development and Professor and Honorary Dean of National School of Development at Peking University. He was the Senior Vice President and Chief Economist of the World Bank, 2008-2012. ‍He is also Councilor of the State Council and a member of the Standing Committee, Chinese People’s Political Consultation Conference and he is a Corresponding Fellow of the British Academy and a Fellow of the Academy of Sciences for Developing World. In this interview we have asked him about the evolution of the Chinese economy over the next few years and its comparison with Western economies, such as Japan, the US and the EU. He has also given his opinion on China-US strained relations and the actions his country is taking regarding the climate change emergency.

Комментарии • 18

  • @jjbully
    @jjbully 4 дня назад +1

    Amen to that, it is not about if we have problems or not, it is about if we can fix it.

  • @harbinger6562
    @harbinger6562 5 дней назад

    Amen Good afternoon Prof Justin Yiu Lin❤️🇨🇳🦾😇

  • @conscarcdr
    @conscarcdr 3 дня назад +1

    Translation: we can't fix the economy, but I have to talk about 10min...

  • @patbyrneme007
    @patbyrneme007 5 дней назад +3

    Good albeit very conventional analysis. However, the Professor seems to be unaware that the World Trade Organization has ceased to operate since 2019 when the United States withdrew its judges from the Disputes Tribunals. Thus we have growing protectionist measures around the world without any check.

    • @wroughtforge7547
      @wroughtforge7547 3 дня назад

      The world 88% will operate without the US. The international criminal court is a clear indication of the growing insignificance of the US dictatorship. The former prime minister of Paupa New Guinea said to Hilary Clinton if you don’t want to participate, get out of the way...

  • @user-qd8yg1fp7i
    @user-qd8yg1fp7i 4 дня назад +1

    Show strength, China. Can't be meek anymore.

  • @huanghermann5207
    @huanghermann5207 5 дней назад +1

    “Interview with”

  • @runrunshih5128
    @runrunshih5128 2 дня назад

    in your dream. No free market and rule of law, no economic development.

  • @dontaskmewhy100
    @dontaskmewhy100 4 дня назад

    The operator of this channel needs to polish up the English a bit more.

  • @rangak3976
    @rangak3976 5 дней назад

    May be the thumbnail caption should be a complete sentence.. "China has no intention of conflict - with xxxx" without explaining 'with who' , that sentence is a naked lie in my view from India.

    • @Jin-oq2qu
      @Jin-oq2qu 5 дней назад +3

      Maybe you should consider learning what really transpired between China and India. Which side has the incentive to cause trouble will surprise you.

    • @rangak3976
      @rangak3976 5 дней назад

      @Jin-oq2qu Agree sir. Seems like same applies to both of us - guess we are both thinking we know exactly and everything that transpired between India and China. Got to learn who got an incentive or intent a bit more. I will dig more as well. Thanks 🙏

    • @Jin-oq2qu
      @Jin-oq2qu 4 дня назад +1

      @@rangak3976 The reason I’m saying to look into which side has the incentive to cause trouble is that you’ll easily find the cause. It may not be apparent to you in India.
      China is under a lot of pressure from the sanctions and tariff from US and the West. These are not minor sanctions. Huawei has just dropped from Number 1 seller in mobile phone to being an insignificant player in the global stage. This is just an example. There are many more. Would you think China would want to cause trouble with India?

    • @jakew5987
      @jakew5987 4 дня назад +2

      India sees China as threat because it affects India's self concept and self image negatively. India is under pressure to do better than China but it's lagging behind China. The problem is India believes by being democratic, it's enough to be better but that's not true. You need to invest in infrastructure and education across the country which China has done but India didn't do. There are other reasons too but the biggest error is believing being democratic is will certainly bring growth. A country must first invest in its infrastructure and education first. It's useless having a democracy if it doesn't recognize and prioritize those needs first.

    • @rangak3976
      @rangak3976 4 дня назад

      @jakew5987 umm wow.. I did not know. In my view, China was very friendly hard working and an inspiration for development that many in India wanted to emulate and learn from. In 2017, realized that something not right. And 2020 confirmed some weird intentions from this neighbor and surprised many in India. There are many questions we are trying to understand again - trying to figure "why is China even a neighbor at all, when and how did this happen". No rush, we are content for most part with what and how we are. We are still relearning things, don't worry, we will figure things being caused to India (from anyone includingChina). Will not be forgotten. No rush, got lot of patience.
      I think democracy is used an alignment for trade and economic purposes. The way I see, in the context of China, democracy is not part of the play at all. Don't think India uses democratic alignment 'against' anyone.
      Fully and absolutely agree on investments sir - better late than never, need some good and essential investments. I think it started even though not at a pace we wanted.