mato jelic does not need us to show us his face to teach something no ego like these guys who feel showing their face gives us something it does not.we only need to see the board
I am a beginner and want to learn the Englund Gambit The Jackpot (1:36) : If he premoves : 0:57 If he takes : 1:15 If something goes wrong : If the knight takes : 3:05 Knight c3 : 3:44 Rook to b1 : 4:35 Knight to d5 : 6:03
I never knew it was a well known gambit, kept running into it a lot of times during my blitz games and i just slowly learned how to defend against it with the help of engine analysis at the end of my games.
The problem with Levy having 1.8M subscribers now is that these "rarely played" openings are now played by 1.8M people. And this goes for the Vienna, the Vienna Gambit, etc, etc. You can actually tell that you are playing a Levi's subscriber when they use these not-rare-anymore weapons :) I mean, this is a great tribute to the amazing influence that Levi has, but it has its downsides :)
I love when players play this. More often than not at the 900-1000 level, when I don't immediately fall for the gambit they're not prepared well enough for the alternative play, and they're forced to play down a piece with their queen over extended and it often results in me just wiping them out.
Pro tip for anyone wanting an easy refutation against the englund: -get to the position shown at 8:32 but instead of playing e4, you first play f4 and only then e4. -You have two pawns in the center and a developed knight. -develop your bishops with tempo on their queen. It is not winning by any means, but I (a 1700) have won 22/22 of my games from that position. Its just that easy to play.
@@Ebin-ix2jg In chess we have rating system called ELO. My ELO rating is 1700. On chess sites your rating is used to pair you up agianst opponents of similar playing strength. If you win, your elo goes up by a few points, and your opponents elo drops a few points amd the reverse if you lose. Complete beginners are usualy between 0-1000 elo and the top players of the world have a rating between 2500-3000. People have different elo ratings for the different time controls, and over the board vs online.
Loved the short rant about teaching to garden, then not owning the responsibility of your own outcome. I love chess as well as gardening. Thanks for constant inspiration!
Gotham: THIS GAMBIT IS ZO DANGEROUS Also Gotham: 13:41: white is definitely a bit better 14:50: white definitely is better 23:07: we are definitely not suffering too much 23:04: we are still doing 'oke' That coming from an IM the gambit doesn't sound so dangerous.
Hey levy, just wanted to let you know that you content is really appreciated and im waiting impatiently for every video you make. You inspired me to make compliment to people and remember them they’re amazing. I hope everything is good in you life right now, Thanks you for your dedication toward your community, your an absolutely amazing person!
I enjoy Levy's ability to talk to us while playing, like he can split his brain and still win games while instantly analyzing on the fly and explaining moves to us. When I play, I can't even answer a text or I'm thrown off my game.
I would like to personally thank all Englund players, never stop playing the Englund gambit. As a d4 player, nothing is more reassuring than my opponent playing 1.. e5, losing the game in one move. It's like a gift of free rating points every single time. Kudos to you guys
@@deutscheblitzkrieg Makes sense. I mean all I did was look at the engine responses to the englund lines, and my opponents usually don't know the lines after the first few moves, so I almost always come out of the opening winning
@@wicked5999 Yes, the gambit isn't that hard to refute. Under 1000 elo it has maybe about 10% conversion rate and above it, maybe 5%. But it is still playable. I have over 50% win rate with it, so it is an ok opening, especially in faster time formats. I've also caught a lot of London system premovers by surprise with it.
Yes Levy, more videos like this please, very instructional. Remember, just talking out your thought process while playing games is immensely helpful. Who doesn't want a little peak at the mind of a master? I'd love to see more rating climbs/speedruns where you just talk through your process.
Of 1M subscribers there are probably 500 who are thinking of this gambit. Another 500 are thinking of Vienna gambit. If Levy chose to discuss the Vienna, then I’m sure one of those guys would post “hey this is amazing... I was just thinking of this gambit!!” 😂😂😂
Dude I'm fucking murdering people with this Gambit. Every game they either drop their bishop immediately, or the entire king side is emptied out and the king gets checked mercilessly until they blunder something.
Can we just take a moment to appreciate Levy's consistency? He uploads 1-2 videos practically every day, each time being extremely entertaining and educational. Whenever I'm in a bad mood, these videos always cheer me up. Thank you, Levy. YOU are more important than a queen.
The problem with levy nowadays is that when he does these videos is that he's so popular that he ruins all of the openings for us because everyone watches him and now and learns how to beat our favourite traps.
I just got the d4 course, and now you put out not one, but two videos on how to crush the openings mentioned in it. So I guess here’s a reminder to make a “how to crush the trompowsky” video before you forget.
Yeah if his d4 course was complete he would tell you how to refute the englund since it's rly ez. I learned it in like an hour and a half of self study which is probably like a 20 minute video max
I am a beginner and want to learn the Englund Gambit The Jackpot (1:36) : If he premoves : 0:57 If he takes : 1:15 If something goes wrong : If the knight takes : 3:05 Knight c3 : 3:44 Rook to b1 : 4:35 Knight to d5 : 6:03 posting just for me
The Englund is awful, since the refutation is pretty obvious. Unlike some gambits, you don't have to play anything too unusual to beat it - normal, logical moves defeat it. It's a one-trick pony that fails pretty often.
I'm reminded of something Tim McGrew once said of some other unsound but tricky gambits: you can defeat it with normal, logical moves, but they need to be the "right" normal, logical moves. Most combinations of normal, logical moves will result in just a small advantage for White, and it's probably due to that and the traps that result in the Englund scoring quite well for Black. That said, after playing this line regularly from 2004-2009, finding out about the strength of that 8.Nd5 line that forces ...Kd8 did put me off playing it somewhat, as it doesn't feel good hoping that my opponents don't know and won't stumble into the line that gives White a clear advantage.
@@PaulPari yeah I thought of that but maybe he turned off his phone after he deleted the message and after refreshing the page whenever he would use it again, he would see the reply and learn to be more polite, genius. I meant this for them, not for you so please mind your own business and don't be a bitch
This is my favorite bad gambit. I play it all the time, it does really well among my fellow low-rated players lol. I almost always continue with the Soller defense, which sacs yet ANOTHER pawn and leaves the rook with a half open file after castling
Levy, the stockholm variation of the Englund gambit: 1. d4 e5 2. dxe5 Nc6 3. Nf3 Qe7 4. Qd5 and f6. Can you please tell me what to do against that for black to get a decent play? I am a 1700 player.
I love when I watch one of your videos, get the hang of it, practice a bit, and then I get the "wrong" opening 86 times in a row lol. For literally 3 days I've only seen e4 and c4 hahaha
This line is straight up powerful. Unlike other gambit trap lines like for example the Intercontinential Ballisctic Misslie Gambit, it isn't easy for the opponent to deal with, and a lot more of your opponents will play the moves you want. I've played the Englund Gambit many times, and a large majority of my opponents accept the gambit and fall for this trap.
I'm really low rated and it kinda pisses me off when beginners literally memorise strategies. Met a few players who very clearly took their time to learn many ways in which you can checkmate in a few moves. Since I'm a beginner, I couldn't play any moves which felt obvious and had to play unpredictably to avoid falling in their traps. In midgame they were all SHIT. Wonder why.............. yeah. They are really annoying.
Thanks for popularizing this, I'm encountering this a lot as white recently. After 1... e5 I usually offer them the chance to take the move back. They always decline, and then proceed to lose in about 15 moves on average :)
Those games perfectly represent the problems of memorising some tricky line or how to counter said line because as soon as you run out of moves you still are a beginner and lose any advantage you gained, particularly when you play against a player 1000+ points stronger than you.
I means if you are playing against a player 1000+ elo higher than you, you are going to lose either way lmao you have way less than 1% chance of winning in the first place.
I kind of intuitively played this gambit against my opponent and destroyed them. I saw in the engine that I had played the Englund gambit. You of course did a video on it. It's great, but I'm so glad you did the counter play here so I don't get smacked back if they play that line.
mato jelic does not need us to show us his face to teach something
no ego like these guys who feel showing their face gives us something
it does not.we only need to see the board
imagine complaining that a youtuber has a face camera
PIN OF SHAME
Pin of shame smh
Wait this is so old why are we all here, especially Levy lmao (video, not comment)
Pin of shame pog
"20000 players fell for this gambit" actually misconception. I, who fell for it 20000 times, am an outlier and should not have been counted
😂
Oh, Spiders Georg, when will they stop including you in surveys?
I am a beginner and want to learn the Englund Gambit
The Jackpot (1:36) :
If he premoves : 0:57
If he takes : 1:15
If something goes wrong :
If the knight takes : 3:05
Knight c3 : 3:44
Rook to b1 : 4:35
Knight to d5 : 6:03
thanks mate, appreciated
What if white goes qd5 ?
damn thanks bro
@@cadenstarry6614 lol then your gonna have to play chess Im sorry
Um ofc ure a bigginer since u watch Gotham Chess
This man is a legend. When I discovered this channel I watched 3 of levy’s videos, and my rating went up by 150 in two days
lol when I started watching my rating went up 200 lmao
Nice
and it also cleared up my acne!
My stomach cancer was also cured
I found the love of my life after years of being single
You're certainly not the only good chess teacher on RUclips, but you're surely among the best. Clever, funny, complete, you name it. 10 points.
As a major queen's pawn player, I have fallen for this more often than I like to admit
@@lukalastname8199 THE CAPS LOCK BUTTON IS A WONDERFUL CREATION BUT SHOULD NOT BE ABUSED
Also, punctuation motherfucker, learn it.
and with that, Michael Edmunds has disintegrated
@@lukalastname8199 chill
@@lukalastname8199 some people just play chess for fun chill games and don't try to learn the theory after every mistake
My favourite part of the video is “If they don’t take, you’re gonna have to play chess, I’m sorry” 😂😂 7:30
But I hate playing chess!
That's not what i signed up for!!! Outrageous!! :)
Never take on e5, you will be fine and disappoint your opponent on move 2. 😁
But even if you take this line is pretty good for white: 1. d4 e5 2. dxe5 Nc6 3. Nf3 Qe7 4. Qd5! f6 5. exf6 Nxf6 6. Qb3 d5 7. Bg5
Its true
This gambit used to terrify me, but once you learn the moves it's like Christmas morning every time I see it
I never knew it was a well known gambit, kept running into it a lot of times during my blitz games and i just slowly learned how to defend against it with the help of engine analysis at the end of my games.
i like how i never seen the englund gambit
@@hapainess3636 are you quite new? It's pretty much the scholars mate of d4 openings. A rite of passage to face.
@@DragonBank kinda
I take the first pawn, but then don't bother defending it. At my level, people just collapse without the trick to lean into.
can not believe levy’s lamp is higher rated than me
So let’s change that mate
Levy's lamp lives on his room, it watches every single game Levy plays.
I wouldn't be surprised if his socks are higher rated than me tbh
His glasses are higher rating than me, they allow levy to see therefore allowing him to play… this level is insane..
Not to mention Levy's Chair...
The problem with Levy having 1.8M subscribers now is that these "rarely played" openings are now played by 1.8M people. And this goes for the Vienna, the Vienna Gambit, etc, etc. You can actually tell that you are playing a Levi's subscriber when they use these not-rare-anymore weapons :) I mean, this is a great tribute to the amazing influence that Levi has, but it has its downsides :)
Also makes it so alot more people are ready to play against it
its good though. because it would be too easy otherwise. everyone is surprised pikachu face like this and its kinda funny lol
the RUclips chess community make it so a rating below 600 doesn't necessarily mean you're a child just new to chess.
its 2.67 million people now 🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂
@@hiroshitakana433 did he just earn 20k subs in 23 hours
I love when players play this. More often than not at the 900-1000 level, when I don't immediately fall for the gambit they're not prepared well enough for the alternative play, and they're forced to play down a piece with their queen over extended and it often results in me just wiping them out.
Yeah not sure why this guy thinks it's so great
Hey Levy, not sure if you’re looking for suggestions for games... if you are, could you do Anand vs Aronian from 2013?
#suggestion #gothamchess
Love that game
Thats good
Idk the game, but they make it sound worth the time
Cool name dude
Pro tip for anyone wanting an easy refutation against the englund:
-get to the position shown at 8:32 but instead of playing e4, you first play f4 and only then e4.
-You have two pawns in the center and a developed knight.
-develop your bishops with tempo on their queen.
It is not winning by any means, but I (a 1700) have won 22/22 of my games from that position. Its just that easy to play.
Damn that is genius and also listen to the guy above me and delete this
Delete please, we shall be the only to to be burdened with such cripplous logic.
What do u mean by ur a 1700? No offence i just started playing chess and i dont know anything pls teach me
@@Ebin-ix2jg In chess we have rating system called ELO. My ELO rating is 1700. On chess sites your rating is used to pair you up agianst opponents of similar playing strength. If you win, your elo goes up by a few points, and your opponents elo drops a few points amd the reverse if you lose.
Complete beginners are usualy between 0-1000 elo and the top players of the world have a rating between 2500-3000.
People have different elo ratings for the different time controls, and over the board vs online.
nice
Eric Rosen did a "guess the ELO" so now Levy is getting his own Stafford
Actually Aman plays this opening a lot where he sacrifices the queen if i'm not mistaken
Yeah, the Englund is already Aman's Stafford
Levy is a great teacher. He has a great understanding and knows how to break it down for us simple minded 600 players lol
his openings vids are concise
Absolutely agree
Just won using this method, actually a few games 🤣🤣 this video single handedly brought me to 1000
This got me to 800 😄
This got me to 800 😄
Loved the short rant about teaching to garden, then not owning the responsibility of your own outcome. I love chess as well as gardening. Thanks for constant inspiration!
Gotham: THIS GAMBIT IS ZO DANGEROUS
Also Gotham:
13:41: white is definitely a bit better
14:50: white definitely is better
23:07: we are definitely not suffering too much
23:04: we are still doing 'oke'
That coming from an IM the gambit doesn't sound so dangerous.
I mean that was on levy for not defending his bishop
His point is that white is technically winning, but the winning line requires making very precise moves that most people will miss.
tried it, had to resign in 8 moves
@@ibrahim-sj2cr ur just bad i am on 1600 elo and winning Blitz games
I guess you don’t know what a gambit is.
Hey levy, just wanted to let you know that you content is really appreciated and im waiting impatiently for every video you make. You inspired me to make compliment to people and remember them they’re amazing. I hope everything is good in you life right now, Thanks you for your dedication toward your community, your an absolutely amazing person!
Nice comment, hope you get pinned!
This comment is certified wholesome.
@@slowfoods6018 Yess!
And Don't forget to get rest properly...
Coz U looked tired today....
Not criticizing... I m concerned.....
He should start, Pin of fame like Pin of shame....
In which best wholesome or Amazing comments are pinned...
Should also continue pin of shame
His shirt elo has been going through the roof since he took a break.
69 likes
:))
I enjoy Levy's ability to talk to us while playing, like he can split his brain and still win games while instantly analyzing on the fly and explaining moves to us. When I play, I can't even answer a text or I'm thrown off my game.
I would like to personally thank all Englund players, never stop playing the Englund gambit. As a d4 player, nothing is more reassuring than my opponent playing 1.. e5, losing the game in one move. It's like a gift of free rating points every single time. Kudos to you guys
I have a positive record with the englund. Either way i prefer it than play d5 and allowing my opponent to play his/her favourite opening.
@@deutscheblitzkrieg Makes sense. I mean all I did was look at the engine responses to the englund lines, and my opponents usually don't know the lines after the first few moves, so I almost always come out of the opening winning
@@wicked5999 Yes, the gambit isn't that hard to refute. Under 1000 elo it has maybe about 10% conversion rate and above it, maybe 5%. But it is still playable. I have over 50% win rate with it, so it is an ok opening, especially in faster time formats. I've also caught a lot of London system premovers by surprise with it.
do you take the e5 pawn or do something else?
@@seand.8897 Yes, always take the pawn
Yes Levy, more videos like this please, very instructional. Remember, just talking out your thought process while playing games is immensely helpful. Who doesn't want a little peak at the mind of a master? I'd love to see more rating climbs/speedruns where you just talk through your process.
*peek
Peak is the top of a mountain. Peek is getting a little glimpse of something.
@@jasmineharding5110 However, a master's mind is kind of at the peak of chess IQ.
@@jasmineharding5110 didn't knew that
So early levy hasn't even started to speak Russian
He’s in my head I swear I just thought of learning the Englund
well its englund close but not far
You and me both
Of 1M subscribers there are probably 500 who are thinking of this gambit. Another 500 are thinking of Vienna gambit. If Levy chose to discuss the Vienna, then I’m sure one of those guys would post “hey this is amazing... I was just thinking of this gambit!!” 😂😂😂
ENG lund
@@ishanphutela8246 God save the British Queen .. hip hip hooray for the England gambit !!!
25:58 "at least it makes me look a little bit more human" implies levy is a robot, or an ai, or maybe even an alien
Now I know why I suddenly encountered the Englund gambit for the first time in a real game after playing chess for 30 years.
Clicked faster than Levy rapping .
thank you for giving people this losing move, as a d4 player I'm probably gonna get +50 elo in 2 days.
Thank you for playing this boring move, as a d4 hater I'm probably going to puke next time I see it.
@@brajanf8901 why?
I crushed black every time they play this. haha.
@Bacon Hair what the fuck bro
It's not a losing move lmfao
Those shirts getting more wild in each video
next it's gonna be an ahegao hoodie
Agreed
honestly, this is a good bullet repertoire but if you're gonna bring this to a classical tournament just be prepared to get pelted by losses
Dude I'm fucking murdering people with this Gambit. Every game they either drop their bishop immediately, or the entire king side is emptied out and the king gets checked mercilessly until they blunder something.
Now I’m going to be seeing this opening every other game for a week or two.
Now that everyone knows how to play this line I can't play it anymore :)
Don't worry i already forgot! I'm a terrible gardener
why would you play this literal garbage anyways? It's just tricks and won't teach you real chess.
@@bfmvshinigami someone's a stinky piss baby
@@Jackel727 no, he's completely right. If black knows how to play the englund gambit you're borderline lost
@@mixedvibes9613 someone's a stinky piss baby
15:33 "I don't think I'm scared of C4"
well, you should be.
i get it
Guess the Elo 20: "I never want to see B6 again"
Englund Gambit opening video: "I played an exceptionally stupid move. B6 is very very bad."
For the FIRST TIME since watching this video I got the mate in 8 with a 95.3% accuracy (Qxb2 is considered slightly suboptimal).
Thank you Levy!!!
Yeah, after Qb4+, Bd2 Stockfish says Qe7.
dude your work ethic is so insane. we all appreciate you so much
2 uploads in 11 hours!!?? He’s back.
“RUclips is superior.”
-Levy, during that one episode where Twitch kept making the same joke over and over
It’s weird how good moves are immediately looked at with suspicion.
Started trying this gambit out and keep forgetting the main lines and been absolutely getting my wheels smoked off
Clicked faster than Eric hansen threw his chair off the table
Overused
@@mditm6966 he literally doesn't care
Can we just take a moment to appreciate Levy's consistency? He uploads 1-2 videos practically every day, each time being extremely entertaining and educational. Whenever I'm in a bad mood, these videos always cheer me up. Thank you, Levy. YOU are more important than a queen.
Y'all take enough moments every day it's starting to become creepy lol
“This gambit is so dangerous” HOW DANGEROUS IS IT?
So dangerous
As someone who's won with the Blackburn Schilling multiple times, I have to try this at some point.
That opening is extremely rare for white, out of 100 games I might see it once.
The problem with levy nowadays is that when he does these videos is that he's so popular that he ruins all of the openings for us because everyone watches him and now and learns how to beat our favourite traps.
And then, it's all up to s-kill and I-Q.
Loved that you included the Hambleton variation (queen sac on e3)!!
Late night uploads? I love'em! Good for study and falling asleep to.😅👌
Every time I watch one of these videos and try it the person I’m against uses every single best move from the video lmao
there is tricky line that I found from Rosen that wins a queen...it is d4, e5, dxe5, Bc5, Nf3, d6, exd6, Ne7, dxe7, Bxf2+, Kxf2
I just got the d4 course, and now you put out not one, but two videos on how to crush the openings mentioned in it.
So I guess here’s a reminder to make a “how to crush the trompowsky” video before you forget.
Ye its just tricky and u just have to be solid.
Yeah if his d4 course was complete he would tell you how to refute the englund since it's rly ez. I learned it in like an hour and a half of self study which is probably like a 20 minute video max
i don’t even like chess that much, i just like levy’s personality. commenting for algorithm, thank you so much for entertaining me (:
Levy’s IM title makes it look like his name is I’M gothamchess
When he screamed "HOWEVER...." I lost it! Levy, you are an ultimate star!
I am a beginner and want to learn the Englund Gambit
The Jackpot (1:36) :
If he premoves : 0:57
If he takes : 1:15
If something goes wrong :
If the knight takes : 3:05
Knight c3 : 3:44
Rook to b1 : 4:35
Knight to d5 : 6:03
posting just for me
The Englund is awful, since the refutation is pretty obvious. Unlike some gambits, you don't have to play anything too unusual to beat it - normal, logical moves defeat it. It's a one-trick pony that fails pretty often.
Stfu lmfao
@@isaacshah8006 she's right unfortunately
I'm reminded of something Tim McGrew once said of some other unsound but tricky gambits: you can defeat it with normal, logical moves, but they need to be the "right" normal, logical moves. Most combinations of normal, logical moves will result in just a small advantage for White, and it's probably due to that and the traps that result in the Englund scoring quite well for Black. That said, after playing this line regularly from 2004-2009, finding out about the strength of that 8.Nd5 line that forces ...Kd8 did put me off playing it somewhat, as it doesn't feel good hoping that my opponents don't know and won't stumble into the line that gives White a clear advantage.
This Godforsaken gambit is why i switched from the accelerated dragon to the classical london.
HAHAAHAHAHH the amount of times I've won the bishop on move two is hilarious
Same only I just lose it
@@boazcohen7992 what are you doing on RUclips!? Continue studying
To whoever it is who deleted the msg, I'm 2000 so stfu
@@Jo_Es_Chess_Channel if he deleted the message he wont see ur reply genius
@@PaulPari yeah I thought of that but maybe he turned off his phone after he deleted the message and after refreshing the page whenever he would use it again, he would see the reply and learn to be more polite, genius. I meant this for them, not for you so please mind your own business and don't be a bitch
Ah, I see. I should be playing smart. My greatest weakness.
This is my favorite bad gambit. I play it all the time, it does really well among my fellow low-rated players lol. I almost always continue with the Soller defense, which sacs yet ANOTHER pawn and leaves the rook with a half open file after castling
Gotham, will you please re-start your “how to win at chess videos “ ? Love those !!!
he's doing one in the next sunday
@@starminor5682 ruclips.net/video/BLUkgRAy_Vo/видео.html
@@SavDerpy obviously the commenter that he's responding to cares since they asked if he would do more, dumbass
@@HiHi-oc3gh what did u just call me?
@@SavDerpy a dumbass. If starminor said that to any other comment i would agree with you but the comment is specifically asking if there will be more.
Tried this on the first player who was white and played d4 worked so well. They blocked the queen with their queen and a few moves later resigned
Every time I watch Levy's videos, I get ads warning that my colon has 25lbs of toxic poop.
I mean, of course the poop is bad for the body; there wouldn't be a need to remove it otherwise.
11:09 i am not going to play queen c3 I've some respect for my opponent 🤣😂🤣😂 best line
I used to look for the same exact queen - bishop positions every game and ending up doing a caro-kann defence hillbilly attack
this video will haunt me for the rest of my life
Wla yhmena da a7na masryen bardo😂
Levy hope you can get that GM title, you definitely deserve it. Thanks for all the content you're outputting!
7:30 god damnit Levy that was the one thing I was trying to avoid
Levy, the stockholm variation of the Englund gambit: 1. d4 e5 2. dxe5 Nc6 3. Nf3 Qe7 4. Qd5 and f6. Can you please tell me what to do against that for black to get a decent play? I am a 1700 player.
I love when I watch one of your videos, get the hang of it, practice a bit, and then I get the "wrong" opening 86 times in a row lol. For literally 3 days I've only seen e4 and c4 hahaha
Welcome back to another video where I learn more gambits and turn gambit into blunder in 2 moves!
This line is straight up powerful. Unlike other gambit trap lines like for example the Intercontinential Ballisctic Misslie Gambit, it isn't easy for the opponent to deal with, and a lot more of your opponents will play the moves you want. I've played the Englund Gambit many times, and a large majority of my opponents accept the gambit and fall for this trap.
its bad
@@geoffreygeorge999 It became bad after it gained publicity a year ago 🤷♂️
it was always bad. Trap openings are hope chess nothing else@@moronoftheinternet8864
I ran into a premover who hanged his bishop on his second turn but I was too excited and didn’t see it. :(
My opponent brought out their queen to protect their pawn
2:17 I've been playing the Englund for a long time and three minutes ago was the first time I got this mate. It felt so good. Thank you.
Im sure Eric Rosen is saying somewhere "Oh no my prep!"
This is the reason why I'm seeing so many games with same line against me on lichess
I'm really low rated and it kinda pisses me off when beginners literally memorise strategies.
Met a few players who very clearly took their time to learn many ways in which you can checkmate in a few moves.
Since I'm a beginner, I couldn't play any moves which felt obvious and had to play unpredictably to avoid falling in their traps.
In midgame they were all SHIT. Wonder why.............. yeah. They are really annoying.
so this guy beat me then I wanted a rematch I ended up doing the Englund gambit by accident and I won in 16 moves the most GG moment ever
I'm new to Chess and enjoyed the video. Very impressed how you were able to recover from Blunders. Thanks for posting.
As a 20000 rated player, I can confirm that this gambit works wonders at my level
at 20,000 rating....which is eons higher than anyone else...anything can work at your level.
@@paulvandervelden4087 The thumbnail. 20000 players fell for this.
"atleast this makes me look a little bit more human"
good one alpha zero
clicked on this faster then hikaru became an IM
edit: for every like is a blessing toward your family
*Read more*
That guy was slow. Clicked on this before abhimanyu mishra became an IM
@@arunavsharma5277 >slow
@@arunavsharma5277 who is he?
@@dancewithgoli7817 My cousin
@@arunavsharma5277 i forgot his name so i went with hikaru lol
Ive just found you and 3 mintes was enough to make me subscribe you. Noone befere explained me a chess opening as good as you did.
*sings* "when there's war and all is hell send in Jan Englund"
1:00 funny because I play the Scandinavian and I can't count the amount of times my opponent accidentally plays the Tennsion Gambit
God damnit now I cant play my favorite Gambit anymore because everyone will know it
Sad. This is your fav.
Thanks for popularizing this, I'm encountering this a lot as white recently. After 1... e5 I usually offer them the chance to take the move back. They always decline, and then proceed to lose in about 15 moves on average :)
"20000 players fell for this gambit"
1.6m players surely won't
A bonus to this opening is you can premove 1. …e5 as black in bullet games. Backfires with the Reti but it’s rare.
When you realise that you have blundered that London bishop 100 times. 😂
Thanks, Gotham for this tutorial.
Those games perfectly represent the problems of memorising some tricky line or how to counter said line because as soon as you run out of moves you still are a beginner and lose any advantage you gained, particularly when you play against a player 1000+ points stronger than you.
Sure, don't use this against strong opponents unless it's a bullet/blitz game and you're surprising them.
I means if you are playing against a player 1000+ elo higher than you, you are going to lose either way lmao you have way less than 1% chance of winning in the first place.
And I'm pretty sure no one is gonna fall for this because so many people know about this
As a 1000 rated d4 player, I can't tell you how many times I see this gambit.
but unfortunately, I don't start with central pawns...
Everyone always plays Nc3 whenever I play this line...
Some days I feel a strong urge to gently caress Levi's moustache, but not today.
How is this not pinned yet?
08:13 I didn't know rooks can go diagonally
I kind of intuitively played this gambit against my opponent and destroyed them. I saw in the engine that I had played the Englund gambit. You of course did a video on it. It's great, but I'm so glad you did the counter play here so I don't get smacked back if they play that line.
Same, I won this game handily against black, and turns out it was because of this gambit