How to Merge 3D Models into Aerial Video Footage

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @AnimeArts
    @AnimeArts Год назад +6

    I have been with blender for 9 years,no one but you are the best to deliver any information with blender in a very simple way like this.

  • @pumpkinsupreme4682
    @pumpkinsupreme4682 Год назад +1

    When I have a problem with blender and I look for help I cant find anyone that covers my specific problem except for you (or the tutorial is too complicated for my smooth brain). Thank you!

  • @benfyat78
    @benfyat78 Год назад +1

    Amazing Tutorial mate , u didnt make it Complicated , Thank you !

  • @Ravensun807
    @Ravensun807 Год назад

    Thanks good for your kind knowledge. Using Blender for 5 years no one has ever done aerial tutorial.... ONLY YOU!!!! Other people are so greedy with their Knowledge.. Thank you.. please do more aerial tutorial... subbed,

  • @jamesriley5057
    @jamesriley5057 8 месяцев назад

    Very well done. My drone footage seems to lose trackers so quickly. I thought that was surprising when it was 4k video of a building. Thanks again

  • @danielritter1869
    @danielritter1869 Год назад +1

    thank you very much for this tutorial

  • @pcatful
    @pcatful 9 месяцев назад

    When you said Blender my heart dropped...Blender can do anything it seems, but can you do Blender? OK . Let's try....

  • @Albert_Riseal
    @Albert_Riseal Год назад

    That's a great tutorial. Thnx 👍👍

  • @ObscureHedgehog
    @ObscureHedgehog Год назад +1

    Good video, however, why would you use Eevee to render out a 3D element that's going onto a real life footage? Also, you have an actual accurate shadow catcher as a one click setup in Cycles.

    • @architecturetopics
      @architecturetopics  Год назад +1

      True, but eevee faster with 360 frame

    • @ObscureHedgehog
      @ObscureHedgehog Год назад

      @@architecturetopics Oh I agree, totally! However, for such a non geometry heavy scene, is the speed really worth the sacrifice to render quality? Cycles X with Optix viewport denoising is already super fast. What GPU are you using?

    • @architecturetopics
      @architecturetopics  Год назад

      @@ObscureHedgehog I'm with you on that, and i tried Cycles with this scene but found eevee more suited, again i think eevee is the main one here since this is a small example.
      I first aimed for building animation with this however the video will be long over 30 minutes, so in the side of building rendering cycles will take more time to render.
      I'm on Quadro 1200M or something like that.

  • @TianaT4
    @TianaT4 5 месяцев назад

    This is great! Thank you so much! One question though: How do I render with the background video showing? Mine is rendering as PNG without the video :/

  • @TheSiRiUs9
    @TheSiRiUs9 Год назад

    thats interesting of your work thanks for sharing 💙💙💙💙

  • @ahmedsabrah4133
    @ahmedsabrah4133 9 месяцев назад

    after placing the model when i play the animation the model is like moving in the footage not sure what i did wrong

  • @rajendrameena150
    @rajendrameena150 Год назад

    If blender has so easy tracking process then why people track in after effects and then bring into blender

    • @architecturetopics
      @architecturetopics  Год назад

      I think both are easy, maybe ae has less steps, but the importing process from ae to bender can often generate orientation problems.

    • @joachimfure8030
      @joachimfure8030 Год назад

      AE is a one click solver. Its excellent when it works, it also often magicly solves hard scenes that for some reason wont solve properly in Blender. But ofc, since its a one click, if it fails, it fails, nothing you can do(besides a few masking tricks sometimes)