EXCLUSIVE! Amber Heard UK Verdict Proven UNJUST -
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июн 2022
- EXCLUSIVE! Amber Heard UK Verdict Proven UNJUST - @BlackBeltBarrister Exposes The Truth
Watch BlackBeltBarrister's video here: • Video
Excerpt from The Hollywood Reporter
Johnny Depp Flipped the Script With His Defamation Trial Victory
Social media, a nonsequestered jury and early dismissal were among the factors that led to the verdict in a Virginia court despite a ruling that went the opposite way in the U.K.
After 13 hours of deliberating, jurors deciding the fate of Johnny Depp’s defamation duel with Amber Heard announced that they had reached a verdict. Only there was one problem: They forgot to specify damages.
Judge Penney Azcarate told jurors to retire back to the deliberation room with no deadline on when to return. It could have taken an hour or another three days. After all, juries are given wide latitude on calculating damages, and there’s no formula to follow. They are not given a lot of guidance.
But only 15 minutes later, the jurors returned with a number. They awarded Depp $15 million in a verdict in favor of the actor on nearly all counts. Of the award, $5 million was in punitive damages aimed to punish Heard for especially reprehensible conduct and to deter similar conduct in the future (later reduced to $350,000 in accordance with the state’s statutory cap).
The decision stood in stark contrast with the result in Depp’s suit in the United Kingdom, where he lost a similar defamation case. One major difference that led to the reversal in Depp’s fortunes, said legal experts, is that his case was decided by a jury, unlike his trial overseas, which was decided by a judge.
S U P P O R T T H I S. C H A N N E L:
Subscribe, Donate, Get Merch & Follow Us Here: linktr.ee/AndySignore
Buy our Exclusive MERCH: nosysknows.com/pages/popcorne...
And JOIN Our Community to become a Popcorned Planeteer, to really become a part of the team for Perks, Members Only Live Shows and EXCLUSIVE Videos & Replays: • Members-only videos
Popcorned Planet offers Celebrity News, Pop Culture Outrage, Missing Person Cases and True Crime Stories. Some on-going stories we're passionate about: Justice for Johnny Depp, Justice for Britney Spears, the Gabby Petitio Foundation and Astroworld Accountability. Created and hosted by Andy Signore (creator of ScreenJunkies, Honest Trailers, MovieFights, Hugging The Cactus, Movie World, Man At Arms and more). PopcornedPlanet is your one stop place Daily News, Celebrity Drama, Hollywood insight and Pop Culture Commentary.
C O N T A C T / B U S I N E S S : PopcornedPlanetTeam@gmail.com
Or Send Packages, Toys & Fan Mail To:
Andy Signore
16350 Bruce B Downs Blvd
PO Box # 48742
Tampa FL, 33647
Make sure to SUBSCRIBE! We talk UK Perjury Charges in tomorrow's Video!! Also Please Share & Watch BlackBeltBarrister's video here: ruclips.net/video/iPfPG0qSERs/видео.html Don't let the media spin this unjustly!
AMBER WAS SEEING THE JUDGES SON WASNT SHE? SHE HAD A DINNER WITH JUDGES WIFE AND THEiR SON. A VIDEO SAID.
Fantastic glad you have daniel on your channel i was thinking about it when he put up the petition 👏👏👏👏👏
LEASE CHECK TUCKER CARLSON ABOUT TAYLOR LORENZ WHO WROTE AN ARTICLE ABOUT THE VERDICT, SHE NEEDS TO BE EXPOSED, AS AMBER WAS. CIRCULATE.
And sign his petition to re-open the UK trial!!!!
Andy can you post the link to the petition. It keeps deleting everytime I post it.
The UK trial was totally corrupt and so wrong in so many ways. As a UK resident - I and many others felt so ashamed of our legal system. AH never won the UK trial and Elaine knows that!! Keep up the great work Andy
Spot on. Our legal system isn't up to standard if you ask me.
Our legal system is totally down the drain
@@rachelsimpkins8924 Hasn't been for years
Me too it sickened me definitely corrupt.
Elaine just wants to be paid and wants her reputation back.
Being British, I don't want to say the UK trial was corrupt, but it was. The judge's son worked for Rupert Murdoch's company, how he was he able to preside over this case is beyond me.
Being British also , I am not surprised it was unjust...
Surely that should be seen as a conflict of interest?
@@TheAbsoluteGenius you’ve earned your name
@@TheAbsoluteGenius
Why wasn’t Judge forced to resign from Lawsuit due to be Biased?
@@cathlennon2045 welcome to the UK. Conflicts of interest are rife in our society, politics and legal system.
I'm a Brit and I find the way Judge Nicol handled this case was disgusting, it was like he'd already made up his mind or been told by someone to decide the case in favour of The Sun and Dan Wootton and by definition in Ambers favour way before the case started. It smells so much like a rail road job against Johnny Depp, especially when his appeal was flatly refused for some feeble reason. In my mind the whole case needs investigating along with Judge Nicol.
If the judge found Kate James to be not credible because she was disgruntled about losing her job, he should have also found all of Ambers friends to be not credible because they were disgruntled at being made homeless... and Amber herself disgruntled about being dumped, divorced and denied those three penthouses 🤷♀️
That is why she filled for the divorce do she could say she wasn't dumped and that she finally had the courage to leave her "abusive' husband
Good point. Those lowlife friends really should be tried for all their lies and setting up staging the scenes and expose the pooper.
As a UK citizen, I am ashamed our justice system failed JD. One word: sorry.
Thank you. Sorry that corrupt and/or incompetent clown made the good people of the UK look bad. Please demand justice and punishment for this outrageous wrong.
No worries, in the end, she's the instigator/villain here.
You guys gave us sex pistols, royal blood, Led Z, etc more than makes up for that c*** 😂😂
Aww. No worries we have Much to work on all of us.
Trust me I’m very familiar with the “ugh sorry on behalf of everyone “ feeling.
Amazing how this story went like wildfire.
It hit a global nerve.
But also, I think gave some of us a needed diversion from our own difficult and heavy global realities.
That’s not to take from the import of the story. Just a thought 🌱
I love the US but if we Americans had to apologize for every bad thing our country did we'd never say anything but "I'm so sorry" all the time.
Honestly I'm surprised our courts got it right but thankfully due to the jury they got it right.
As a Brit, I have signed the petition to have the UK judgement reassessed. The Black Belt Barrister is tops in legal matters
I'm a Brit and I've done the same.
God Bless You! Thank you!
Could you tell me where you found the petition? Please.
Is the timing for that within your statute of limitations, if you have that in the UK?
We don't have statute of limitations
The lies from Elaine has shocked me more than I thought she could. To blame the judge and say she wasn’t fair and just with her actions, when she was so patient and fair. Then to say the Jury went running to the internet during the week long break, people who’ve given up 7 weeks of their lives to be slandered. The lies about her mountain of evidence, how the UK case wasn’t brought up in court and that the Jury weren’t told, yet both her and Rottenborn mentioned it on multiple occasions. She is an embarrassment.
i just read an article that says 'Lawyer says Amber Heard ‘absolutely’ cannot pay court-ordered $8.35m in damages'. so what happens next when cannot pay court-ordered damages?
Thanks to this channel, we all know what kind of "evidence" that was. Statements made by *Amber* to her therapist and notes from an ENT specialist saying the *inside* of her nose was a mess (and we all know why!).
During the court proceedings, I felt sorry for Elaine Bredehoft as she seemed to be acting in good faith but THIS...
@@edwardcandra2510 She will have to file for bankruptcy and her assets (mansion etc.) will need to be sold to pay as much as she can afford of the damages. Sadly that means Johnny won't get the full amount but at least he has cleared his name and can start earning again.
@@ladygagarin1660 i see..but i believe johnny depp never really cared about the money anyway. he can get 10 times more money easily from the movies he's gonna be in in the future
It was aggravating to hear so many times about "when we won the case in the UK" despite the fact that Heard was NEVER involved in that case. So she "won" nothing. She wasn't even involved. That case was a slam dunk for Johnny from beginning to end and that's why when the verdict was read I was gobsmacked and stunned. I wasn't the only one. That was an open and shut slam dunk for Johnny that he LOST.
When you lose an easy layup like that it's because the system screwed him and not the evidence.
Elaine's got nothing else to flog, so she's talking all kinds of nonsense about ge UK case. Pathetic.
Thank you for pointing out this obvious fact. It was against the sun (news paper or magazine) and Johnny. Stating he was a wife beater in their article. Amber had nothing with this and didn't win or loose Jack shit.
That layup part was spot on 👌👌
As a Briton, I'm ashamed of the UK verdict. Even worse, Johnny Depp was denied the right to appeal, so could never legally challenge the verdict. I'm so glad the world has been able to see the truth & Heard revealed to be the real abuser. Elaine relying on the UK verdict to try & rehabilitate Amber Heard is disgraceful.
I'm glad they did this video, to point out it's one person's actions, the judge, & shouldn't reflect badly on his country. The fact that you feel badly about this reflecting on your country highlights something important about humans: Identifying ourselves with our country, religion, etc, causes lots of problems, like how we do bad things for "good" reasons, like starting wars. To most people in the world, something like this DOES affect their view of one person's actions. We all do this.
That's why Sadhguru teaches that many problems in our society, like wars, are caused by how we all identify ourselves with things outside of our true selves. That's what causes people to do bad things in the name of "good", like wars.
Thank you! This one girl I follow who usually does a great job researching topics really missed talking about this because she made a lot of assumptions including about the uk case being totally fair and reflecting the actual situation and dipped into victim blaming. People really can’t accept male victims
Yes 100% it is embarrassing, now that makes me feel like i would think so many times before asking for justice as this has happened to me before I told them I ain’t got evidence but I need you to tell him to stay away from me and they kept telling me we can’t do anything tell he does something to you I said again he already has I don’t want him to do it again I don’t have evidence but please keep him away from me at the end I gave up and moved to a different town that’s the justice we can expect in UK and poor guy Johnny was denied appeal 2 times
Wait until more people realize who the UK Judge is related to...
As a fellow Brit I agree. But I've got to admit that I'm proud that JD chose to come here to decompress even before the verdict was read. In my opinion it goes to show that he understands that the judges verdict is not a true representation of our (the people of the UK) opinion of him.
He seems to be a top lad and will always be welcome here
all I can say to Amber Heard is don’t try to destroy someone’s life with lies when yours can be destroyed by the truth.👍
💯💯💯💯💯
I'm going to use this for the rest of my life
I love your comment, Derek! 👏🏼 👏🏼 Well said!
nice.
💯💯💯💯
How sad is it that Elaine, Amber's lawyer, is bouncing around on talk shows trying to justify this loss? She's just as much of a lying snake that Amber is.
someone doesn't want their fame to die out
Her 15 minutes lol
The way I perceived the recording when Johnny Depp said, “don’t tell me what it feels to be punched”. This for me is implying that Amber wouldn’t know how it felt to be punched, because she wasn’t punched, but Johnny was so therefore he would know.
He should have forked off then and there instead of ' encouraging her. ' My Daddy would have said HE is to blame.
@@bikecontroller3268 well, your daddy would’ve been wrong.
I would add that it seems she tried the word game with him a lot, gaslighting him to make him feel stupid and off kilter. So, it might also be, “I’m the one who got hit so don’t tell me what it was. I didn’t ask what it was. “
Sheer projection on your part.
All her lies expressed for the world to see, the judge in UK is a disgrace, lost for words
He was lied to? He belived that she had donated all of the money wich was a big part of his ruling, We only found out now that she didnt.
@@mso2013 well buying a verdict paying in charity remains buying, but let's be frank here i dont buy even for a second that this judge was in good faith, judges are not airheads
Rekless disregard of evidence and truth this time, is the judge himself. Just compare and contrast this UK Judge Andrew Nicol and Virginia judge Penney Azcarate. Judge Andrew Nicol ignore multiple evidence using different excuses where as Judge Penney through out the trial remained mostly impartial I would say and just did her job running the court smoothly and effectively meanwhile letting the jury to be the fact finder. What a contrast that is. Some people say our society put women down and elevate men, well we hear a lot of praises for judge Penney and a lot of backlashes on Judge Andrew Nicol. in the end it's about doing a good job and having integrity.
So glad the trial in the US was televised we might not have found out any of this.
Not the Judge , the judge was a puppet and people were bribed
That case in the UK needs to be overturned and thrown out + give JD his money and good name back!!!
From what I understand, you can only appeal once in the UK and Johnny already appealed. I also read something about the judge in that case retired almost immediately after that trial.
AGREED!!!!!
I think they should bring Amber back for PERJURY.
@@lolspoolin7366 He did retire immediately after the trial in Monaco……..a tax haven! He is such a corrupt dishonourable man that I’m sure he accepted all the pay offs that were offered to him by the two most disgusting rich men in the world, and we know who they are! Shame on you! British justice system!
there is a petition for it
When Johnny replied “don’t tell me what it feels like to be punched” if in fact she had ever been punched, I think she would have replied “I know what being punched feels like”.
Excellent point!
I never paid attention to that but you are absolutely correct!
No. That's what you would have said.
@@larindanomikos I couldn’t have said it because I’ve Never been punched. That’s my point.....
Roy Rices Fiancée found out what it is like to be punched and still married the guy.
Amber thought she had the US case in the bag because of the UK case. She really thought she could bamboozle people in the US. So glad we got to watch the trial and see for ourselves all the deceit that Amber was trying to hide. Justice for Johnny in the UK should be granted.
And now the mainstream media is trying to gaslight us all into thinking we didn't see what we saw and they're trying to twist it.
She even wore the same dress as after UK trial, her sister too. I guess it's her victory-victim dress. Looks like the TRO one too, come to think of it. Lucky dress lost it's charm lol. But that's why they came for the verdict. She thought she'd win and could do another hand holding victory walk.
Yeah, Amber didnt win the UK case since the newspaper The Sun and the article author were the defendents not her. The judge had a double standard saying amber and her friends were credible due to being loyal to her while Johnny and his people weren't because they were loyal to him
We need to bring down the sun newspaper. It’s a disgusting paper. It needs to go.
I wonder if anything they print I'd true
@@tabithapalmer5948 highly doubt it. They’re clowns. Probably would have got away with things 20 yrs ago, but not now so many people are clued up.
Yea ask liverpool they hate the sun after the hillsborough disaster after 96 fans died
@@tabithapalmer5948 , it's considered a rag mags, not a REAL journalistic source
@@1emmajones i think they wrote about aliens abductions years ago
Maybe the former judge should be taken to court for his failure to declare his perceived conflict if interest. Politicians are brought down for it and politicians write the laws.
I’m convinced that the people defending her didn’t even watch the trial. There was no way to believe anything AH said. Everyone who listened to her knew she was the abuser. She is one of the worst liars I have ever seen; bad at telling lies and bad in terms of the frequency of her lies.
People who defend her are probably abusers themself 🙌
The people who believe her are mostly women so they are probably one or all of the following
1: Manipulators/Liars/Abuser just like AH
2: Anti-Men
3: Feminist Nazis
And the few men who believe her are probably simps and/or trying to show the world they "believe all women" too 🙄
Agree. There are plenty of people that didn't have time and count on news headlines to form their opinions. Given the mainstream media is cherry-picking facts to twist the narrative, they really do think amber is innocent. It's shameful on the media, moreso than AH followers. In time they will see the trial or the documentary and realize that they have been bamboozled.
I was curious of how others could still believe her and asked someone I knew who did. She said that AH was consistent with what she knew of DV victims. She also said JD had the trial televised to punish AH and as much as I admired this person I'm confused & saddened they aren't aware of how dangerous it is to believe such a habitual liar.
@@rahbeeuh talk about consistency lol
The U.K. got this so wrong and Dan Wooten should be made to apologise.
LMAO THE SUN IS A SCUMBAG NEWSPAPER, they refused to say sorry to liverpool fans after 30 years of lies abut hillsborough
Dan Wooten with all Countries MSM is Real Life Rita Skeeter,
Rita Skeeter is Harry Potter Character who write falsehood as Facts.
Rita Skeeter was a British witch and journalist who specialised in writing poison-pen stories. These stories tended to be based on false information and misreported interviews.
We're talking about a country that allows a corporation to trademark the word Sky, are we really surprised the justice system is even shittier there than in the US?
The judge should be made to admit that he’s a dirty old perve who CHOSE to please Amber, slobbering old fool made himself look ridiculous, made us all look ridiculous.
It was not the FULL story in the UK.. just one sided.. thank god Johnny got to speak up in front of a jury.
I believe Amber also stated in one of her emails asking him to lie “I wouldn’t want you to have a problem with your job.” That sounds a lot like extortion and threatening his employment if he doesn’t ask Ms James to lie for Amber.
Emails can be hacked so both could possibly do that and make it look like the other.
Amber’s lawer, Elaine, is literally making a fool of herself making the claims that she’s made. She and Amber deserve each other.
Brederhoft will be sued
UK: We believe women. US Virginia: We believe in facts. That's all.
Depends which judge you get in the UK
Which is ironic because for a long time in the UK they did not care about women at all. To get divorced around the time Ibsen was putting out plays women had to have clear proof of the woman cheating or ab? constantly… if you had💰💰💰👀
UK: Judge has connections with the Sun & needs to sweep under rug.
US: Virginia is the best possible outcome for Amber in trial, still lost.
Eh no, I'm from the UK and I definitely didnt believe her
@@lornacuthill5327 same
Im in the UK and Im embarrassed. How a QC (Judge) can personally know people related to the plantiff is mind blowing.
Petition to investigate that QC/ judge for Johnny Depp!
Depp was the plaintiff, and the newspaper was the defendant.
@@PixelProfessor
The judge's son worked for Rupert murdoch, the judge met with AH family members before the trial.
It was a nonsense.
That would be a conflict of interest.
@@killerrabbit2693 true. The judge was the one meeting her and her family to have dinner and such more... Very personal.
And Elaine dared to question about the muffins and dinner client meet for hours on end.. It's projection at the worst degree. Elaine and Scamber are both delusional Narcissists. They did all the dirty and they accuse others of doing it.
I am from the UK and yesterday I read a article basically saying that it is a setback for women, which was what AH quoted after the defamation trial. It really made me angry 😡 as JD has been cleared of all claims against him, the author had no right to write that. It is my opinion that UK justice doesn’t play fair and people get away with everything. Great one USA 🇺🇸
By itself the judge saying the recording not admissible because of lack of oath is absolutely ridiculous. Makes whole case way too fishy!
Crazy thing is that AH and Elaine brought forth more "evidence" in the Virginia trial than they did in the Uk trial. So Elaine going on TV and saying that they lost in part because they couldn't submit as much "evidence" as they did in the Uk, is just so categorically false it makes my head spin. I felt bad for her by the end of the trial, but she's now crossed the line as an attorney, to have lost so spectacularly and then to immediately get on TV the next day and continue to spew lies and blame everyone except Amber, she's really out her digging her career's grave right before our eyes.
The fact that she refused to hand over her phone data says everything. Notice not one single text from Amber was brought up in the US case?.. Because she refused to hand over any of it. Why? Because it was so incriminating...
@@bargepoled elaine can now retire on her cut of pledged 6 million.
@@andydudley1775
And all her interviews 🙄
Elaine must have been referring to the Australia evidence that was inadmissible.
I agree with all you say I think it was totally unprofessional r this clown called elaine to have gone on tv and sewed all this crap. I never felt sorry for Elaine she was rubbish johnnys team chewed her up and spat her out. And I’ll say it again what is going on with her bloody hair, gives me the shivers.
That judge was totally corrupt as there was a massive conflict of interest.
Thank you BlackBelt Barrister and Andy for this. The MOST damning sentence is "Don't tell me what it feels like to be punched" - in that one sentence it sums it all up. If he had been beating her he would not have said that and if he had, she would have said she knows what it feels like. She was the clear aggressor and instigator and that audio would have been vital.
It is just wild how many lies
She’s told over these years !!!
Great reporting !!!
I would LOVE to see perjury charges next! It's absolutely needed and badly deserved. There needs to be consequences for her actions. Celebs, all of them, need to see they are not above the law. Jussie Smollett saw this first hand. He was punished for lying, and so should she be. It's fair and just.
Not only that! Next time I press a burning cigarette in someone's face I'll refer to the AH case to get away with it! LMFAO!
Agree 💯
YUP!! I wonder who brings those charges against her for perjury? Oh, I'll look up Smollett's case.
Exactly.
a few of AH witnesses committed perjury.
Amber has also defamed and destroyed the credibility of the work of women who have worked hard to protect women who have been abused all this time.
No, we believe facts and evidence not people.
She hasn't destroyed any credibility. As long as you have proof, you're believable. We shouldn't believe all women just because they are women, they should have to provide proof just as much as men.
bb Sousou, I heartily agree!
No the part that was destoryed was that it was believe women just because they say and guilty until proven innocent. Now it's back were it should be your innocent until proven guilty and you need evidence . This is how our system is suppose to be. Before people complain I am a woman and a survivor so don't even go there. Everyone either men and women survivors do need to be believed fairly and that is what was so disgusting it wasn't that way.
@@forgotten8936 the burden of proof should should fall on the accuser yes women that say their a victim of domestic abuse their claim should be taken seriously but we shouldn't immediately assume the accused is guilty it should be innocent till proven guilty
That Judge should be taken to task and looked at very closely. This is a problem, where one person has the power to determine ones fate.
Judges don't like something you said or the way you dress and make Judgements of you, there and then.
This guy's great,' anyone' who would say he doesn't know what he's talking about needs their head read😉 great interview, very illuminating ❤️
Popcorn planet strikes me as exactly the type of guy that would love to go in on hot women that would never have a damn thing to do with him in real life he just strikes me as one of those MRA types
Hey the smart ass beggar is just looking for a fast buck. Don't EVER go to a lawyer to solve your problem unless you want it dug up, twisted , and shaken not stirred, cos they will charge you for every trick and every fall of the cards . Their job thrives on discord. In UK it has got so out of hand the Government, who pay a lot of the fees, have paid for a cheaper system of Arbitration, based on negotiations and agreement as far as possible . The court adversarial system favours nobody but those earning and churning legal fees. See Bob Dylan " where justice is just a game "....
This is why the public should be aloud livestream access to court cases there's too much corruption!
Yessss OMG you're right 👍
Yeah I don't think corruption will end just because court case are live. That's like saying people will stop lying just because we are looking at them.
@@KingBasieSims4 well it would definitely help to make them less corrupt. Look at police with bodycams. It does help even if it's just a little!!
The thing is, Depp's case was such a media spectacle that millions upon millions of people tuned in to pour over all of the information and evidence. People had a vested interest in the outcome.
Having all court cases live streamed isn't likely to pull the same numbers or interest, or at least, not over a protracted period of time.
Exactly. The reasons cameras and recordings exist.. keep an honest person honest. If you have to hide anything it always begs the simple one worded question... "Why?" Unless the truth is your greatest enemy there is no need to hide anything.
This case should not only be overturned, they (The Sun) should PAY$$$ Johnny for the damages they caused to his reputation AND a PUBLIC apology is well deserved to Johnny the true victim. Then go after Amber for reimbursement since SHE started all this mess with FALSE information.
ABSOLUTELY SPOT ON COMMENT!
I've signed the petition. As an Englishman I'd like to say the ruling was a bloody joke!
Kangaroo court in every sense of the word.
Do her lies ever stop? It seems every day there is something new that she has lied about. What a menace to society imo. Thanks Andy! Love your videos, about the only media I believe :)
No, first because she is a pathological and egocentric liar. Second because she’s the type of person that can’t lose, her ego doesn’t allow it.
It’s extremely angering that AH & her team continue to blatantly lie by stating she won the UK trial 😡 And even more frustrating that none of the interviewers call this out & ask, how do you figure she won when she wasn’t a party in the case 🤦🏼♀️
The legacy of msm…need I say more
They probably don't call it out because it is an Interview, not a debate. In an interview, you ask questions, get you answers, ask another question or a follow up and that's the end of that. The format just doesn't allow for "calling someone out". Some, however, did, by simply phrasing the questions a certain way, let the vierwers know that they disagree with the satement. Like saying "So you said you had all the evidence" instead of just "You had all the evidende..." or that Ex Sportman who was like trying to get Elaine to admit flaws with an analogy of when he was playing. But the thing also is, that Elaine is ALWAYS falling back into a script, too. Repeating the same sentences in same procession again and again and again. it is so frustrating. I really defended that woman, it is sad she continues and I am curious why. I doubt it is money, I don't think Amber has much left if what I've heard is true. So why? Does she actually believe her? Or is it an ego thing, can she not handle the loss and is doubeling down as a result of that? Publicity?
@@JinsanSama amber bought a house and do called miney to pay lawyers is coming out of her house insurance.
@@JinsanSama amber can convince people to lie for her so I feel if she is capable of that she is capable of convincing Elaine to believe her lies
@@normacolon9618 I heard that once too - about her homeowners insurance, but a lawyer said an insurer wouldn’t do that in a defamation case.
The amount of lies this woman has spewed over the years is absolutely crazy. Lies literally define who she is as a person. That is pretty rare to find in a person. So disgusting.
In another life she could've been a successful politician.
She's past a pathological liar
Not rare in this day and age. Narcissism is everywhere. Social media has turned many people into full blown narricists.
I think Amber is a pathological liar. She doesn’t accept reality unless it agrees with her version of it.
@@landoncube769 she should of been fined for eating while testifying
The most annoying thing about the UK case is that team Amber is using that verdict as a shield, without ever mentioning the fact that Amber Heard was NOT the defendant and her evidence was NOT effectively cross examined/scrutinised.
they think we are all morons.
@@StoneDeceiver This is my opinion as well. I think they are looking down upon an ill informed public, that catches on quick once the flow of information is restored & isn't anywhere near as stupid as they would like.
I thought there was also email evidence of AH writing to Kevin saying "I'd hate for you to have a problem with your job" after trying to get him to lie for her.
Very convenient that the judge retired, isn't it?
I'm convinced that with a little digging we'd discover a lot about this judge and his motivations.
I think you are right and I’m all for the digging. Sounds like he had an incentive to rule the way he did. 🤔
Right. There was no “UK trial” for Amber Heard to “win”. It was Johnny Depp suing a newspaper.
I really hope that judge gets looked at because something doesn’t seem right. How come 99% of the world realizes she’s a lier yet that judge didn’t? Hell even look at her during that trial she was laughing and being ignorant the whole time
I've heard that the UK judge has retired.
Sign the petition. Push for the UK case to be reopened.
UK court is a joke. Even a killer can appeal. Katie Price was in court for drink driving, drug driving and driving while banned has a suspended sentence, look it up. We have a kangaroo court, it’s sickening 😡
Dnt forget the restraining order she broke and pleaded guilty to
Ehm... Anyone can appeal any court order in over 200 countries.. That's not a UK thing. It's a right that you have as a person.
I mean, we in America aren’t that far behind you guys…we have a confessed attempted mu*rderer on live recordings admitting to everything she did to her poor vi*ctim-and the only thing we labeled her with is; “a liar” and not the ab*usive, cruel, monster that she actually is
Safe to say that Katie Price is UK’s Amber Heard.
Katie got away with it because she went to Rehab straight away when charged. That helped her sentencing. It’s a joke.
Amber is a narcissist and I am a DV survivor that was married to a narcissist. She will never accept that she was an abuser or wrong or lied or anything but her word is king. Elaine is wrong to go out and try to do damage control because her law firm looks worse now.
No one can control that damage especially elaine in fact she made it worse
Exactly!
Elaine is now in the same category as Turd, imo. These are strong words, but I honestly hate both of them. As a DV Survivor, they're mocking all of us. I hope they both suffer the strongest consequences of their actions.
She'll be very lucky if that legal firm doesn't fire her ass for doing this damage.
Glad people around the world saw how wicked Amber is.
Indeed, “Truth never perishes”- JD
Thanks for taking a closer look at what went wrong in the UK trial. In my opinion, repeatedly lying under oath should be taken as proof that a witness knows the truth will not suffice.
I am English and after everything we heard and saw in the American case, I can’t believe he lost in the UK. Definitely needs to be reopened as this seems to be a huge miscarriage of justice and Johnny should have won
LoL. I think the UK case was basically She said, and Johnny you get to sit and listen. Amber thought she could sell her story here in the US as a DV victim. She didn't have to do that and her evidence was as weak as a noodle in boiling water. She definitely has some sort of personality disorder, and seems severely detached from authentic human interactions & reality. I would say the disorder compelled her actions both in the marriage and after the divorce.
Part of the problem was in the UK (outside the obvious corruption) is that it was a case vs the Sun and not AH so a lot of the evidence he had could not be used.
Well from what I’m reading in the comments, the judge presiding over the UK trial has a son who works for a sister company to the paper involved? And has had dinner outings with AH..? I forget exactly what was said but basically it was supposedly extremely corrupt. In the US, this would be a “Conflict Of Interest” and would never happen, the case would be moved to a different court. Even as a juror, if we know any single person involved in the case, such as the defendant, plaintiff, witnesses, doctors, policeman, etc.. were dismissed as potential jurors. I had a case once and it was moved through several jurisdictions for different conflicts of interest found. If that’s true about the UK stuff, that’s crazy
@@never2yield20 yeah she's definitely not a normal person.. she's literally a psycho. The recordings where she's cackling in his face and belittling him is scary shit.
Thank you. As an American who has to deal with so much corruption I understand what it is like to have to own up to it when we would do everything in our power to fix it but the powers to be ARE the lawmakers. In this case we let a Jury decide and granted a lot of damning evidence against Amber was withheld the Jury saw through the BS and rather then rush to judgement actually took the time to review the evidence ignoring any bias and feelings and politics.
The UK can be redeemed as well but it will take more action then commenting on RUclips videos. [Edit: Corrected a typo.]
As this judge had connection to the murdochs and his son worked with Dan Wooten should he have removed himself because of possible conflict of interest?
Yes
An ethical judge would do that.
Yes he absolutely should have recused himself. Nepotism and corruption shouldn't have a place in our justice system
This is super important that you are putting some context and detail to the UK trial, because we clearly see they are defaulting to that even though they have no idea how that case was handled. The cognitive dissonance taking place is pretty terrible. The media platforms that are pushing this nonsense even after a trial that roundly refuted Ambers claims, are continuing to go after the victim.
Here in the UK The Independent is cock-sure the US trial verdict was wrong. They need some educating asap.
It's very important that Andy did this video with Daniel. It helps people in the US to not have a sour attitude about the UK in general for the results of Johnny's case over there. Daniel dies a great service for the UK.
That judge knew EXACTLY what he was doing. He should be removed. He will "get his" however.
He retired after the case, didn't he?
He retired 6 months after refusing the appeal.
Every time you think you've heard the worse thing about Amber Heard.... there's ALWAYS more to come. My goodness! It wouldn't surprise me if Amber Heard curried the judge's favor in some unethical way.
Probably spent the majority of the time under the Judges bench putting what few skills that she does have to work if you get my meaning.💯
She’s the type of woman for whom the end justifies the means.
Well the judge has a son that works for a sister company of the SUN. The judge has a wife and his wife also knew Amber heard and has gone out to dinner with her before. It was rigged from the start 😔 he also retired shortly after the ruling. He definitely helped out the owners of the paper. Oh and the SUN also edited Amber's pictures that they used to look MUCH worse than they were. The SUN should have lost that case 10000%
@@PineappleBaconPizza I bet if police investigate, they could find that Judge got money from Amber and SUN...
@@PineappleBaconPizza isn’t it disgusting.
She asked him to lie. That's sufficient to undermine her credibility. It's irrelevant how much pressure she put on him. Now if she did put additional pressure on him above and beyond simply asking then that makes it extortionate. Either way it was conspiracy.
Andy. I'm a 42 year old man from the Isle of skye Scotland. I understand that you are up against it considering you speak your mind. I am delighted that you do. I have subscribed to your channel because I Know that you speak the truth. Keep going please.
I strongly believe, the judge in England must be held accountable!!
Yep I've signed the petition.
Just found this guy today myself.
Amber was a witness in the UK not the defendant. Not subject to the same scrutiny.
How many signatures does it have. Where is it?
There's a link below the Blackbelt Barrister's latest videos x
The case should be retried
In the Uk! Corrupt judicial system in Uk.
UK Judge should be investigated.
I cannot believe how AH got away with all of this and how she got away w/it for so long. She was clearly guilty and lied her way through this for years. Why was she believed when she was lying through her teeth? The world knew JD. He’d been around for decades. I don’t know how she got away with this but it sure is scary.
That was the time the Me too was at its peak
Venomism is the short answer. Venomism has indoctrinated people and allowed bad women to get away with bad things. Up to an including murd er..
She didn’t get away with it. The case in the uk was against the sun. When she was brought to task about defamation she lost and didn’t get away it.
She is an excellent manipulator.
Because “believe all women” aka Metoo.
You know, every time I do something stupid these days, or think to myself, "I'm an idiot," I just remind myself that there are people who actually BELIEVE Amber Heard's bullshit (which unbelievably include a UK JUDGE!), and suddenly, I don't feel so stupid anymore! 🤪
🤣🤣🤣
Statistically speaking, there should be one AH supporter who also believes in Flat Earth and Walt Disney’s frozen head.
Also, I believe IQ is calculated off a statistic. 100 is the average, and the maximum IQ is around 240. Which means there should be somebody with an IQ around -40.
I doubt he actually believed her. His son apparently worked for the owner of the sun together with the guy who wrote the article in question. His wife knows Amber personally and he wrote a book with the lawyer representing the sun. The problem is that there are no actual laws forcing a judge to excuse himself from a case that he probably won't be impartial in.
And if you read the actual verdict its such a bunch of bs that is just made me want to vomit. The judge just randomly came up with some of the wildest explanations and defenses in favor of the sun that nobody actually claimed or hinted anything for in court.
@@LocalMaple finally! Someone who speaks in IQ's! Thank You! Methinks terd's IQ is around 27 to 31, & I'm being generous!
Absolutely!!! When I hear someone, especially someone who is supposedly educated still siding with that idiot after the trial is over and she lost, I'm with you, I don't feel so stupid after all 😂
Sounds like her attorneys were attempting to suborn perjury. THATS A CRIME.
Followed BBB for a while, glad he's coming forward to rip this show trial, it's an embarrassment
What else could be inferred by “Don’t tell me what it feels like to be punched” is that he doesn’t think she knows what it feels like to be punched.. suggests that he has never punched her
Good point 👍
Correct. If JD had punched her even once, with all those rings, she wouldn't look pretty as she is still today.
She also says she can't promise she wont hit him again.😯
Yes indeed totally agree!!
And she replied something like 'i know, I know, you've been in a lot of fights'.... Not 'you've punched me multiple times on multiple occasions!'
Even if AH were a defendant on the UK, the US is not obligated to accept a foreign ruling, assuming there are merits to litigate in a US court. It’s completely asinine to think the US is somehow required to forfeit its sovereignty and judgment for a foreign proxy, especially when that proxy has completely different standards, procedures, and laws.
But unfortunately it doesnt apply to the great court of public opinion or the crazy cancel culture internet.
I think its been proved by the sales of dior aftershave and the outpouring of support johnny still has friends and just ordinary people who can look at these events with an open mind and come to reasonable conclusion
We all watched the american vourt case and have hopefully seen and heard her lies clearly . She often came accross as a violent abuser. Johnny an abused man trying to AVOID violence .
I dint think i heard a single recording where i felt it appeared it was recorded "after the fact" of a voilent episode instigated by JD.
AH often sounded abusive, seemingly trying to pick her moments when JD was perhaps intoxiated to try to get him to react, and even then he STILL didnt get violent.
AH is a proper wrong un . Thats what i came to the conclusion of.
If this judge had these ties to Hurd he should never have been anywhere near this case . It is disgusting.
And...duh...2 totally different cases.
They did not WIN the UK trial because there was no UK trial between JD and scamber. She was simply a witness.
Scamber wasn't a party to the UK case. It was between the newspaper and JD.
She was not even a defendant in the UK trial!
that would cause so much shit
I cannot stand when people say she wanted in the UK trial and then Elaine saying that on her little news tour she wasn't a party in the UK trial she was a witness for the opposing party for the Sun.
Found this Wonderful Man and his Lovely Wife Yesterday! Love what they said, referring to UK UNJUST, UNFAIR Trial, which we all followed, and felt EXTREME Remorse for JD!!! I followed You and others, i.e. Lawyers, for the Breakdown of THAT HORRIFIC JUDGEMENT!! Have signed BBB's Petition! Love You and Your Panel of Peeps and soooooo Happy for your come back!!!! Love and Prayers to you All! 🥰
BBB is great. He explained how the UK Courts work, plus he has started a petition for the UK courts to re-open the Sun/JD trial. Started last night and at 10 thousand sigs already.
I really like how BBB broke down 🇬🇧 case and why in his opinion he has problems with it.
Can we get a link?
@@MrsDeBoerUK Yup. UK court procedure sounds way more difficult to understand. But BBB did a good job of explaining it. :)
@@Jesswithlessstress go on BBB RUclips, Andy has put the link up and all the videos are on there
The dogs were controversial here in Australia, because allegedly she didn't declare them and brought them into the country illegally. Seems she just has an issue with authority in general and believes she can get away with anything!!! 🇦🇺
Seems she thrives on conflict of interst! The UK case was probably determined before it began.
Confident Amber was having a love affair with Elon Musk at the time of the trial, and he was also seen spending the night with Amber in Johnny's penthouse while he was away, suggesting an ongoing affair.
James Murdoch, who joined Tesla in 2017 and was at one point in 2018 was favorite to succeed Elon Musk as chairman is the son of Rupert murdoch, OWNER OF THE SUN
Judge Nicol J and his wife have a personal relationship with the Murdoch family, who own the tabloid. The Judge’s son, Robert Palmer works for TalkRadio, a sister company of The Sun owned by Rupert Murdoch.
This is why UK trial verdict and conduct can NOT be trusted, and perhaps why Amber believed yes, she could get away with anything
She has an arrest record- she started early.
Please have them come get her for being disrespectful to Australia, we don't want her here !
Most narcissists do! And they will push it to the absolute limit, just to be able to say they could. The selfishness and self-centredness knows no bounds. To hell with everyone else.
Most malignant, Borderline, Histrionic Narcissists usually, (always DO)
Andy... So glad you had this gentleman on your program! So many people say Amber won the UK trial etc., blah blah blah... Amber was NOT NOT NOT a party in that case! SHE didn't win anything!!! The Sun won against Johnny (unfortunately), not Amber! You get it. You've been saying it all along. Why can't everyone else get it? Amber was not a defendant in the UK trial. Get it right people!!! Thanks Andy for all of your extremely hard work and countless hours you put into covering the Depp vs Heard trial here in Virginia. It was actually held around the corner from where I live. Again, kudos to you and your team Andy. Love you guys!!!😊❤
She also wrote to Kevin Murphy, "well, I need your help on this, I wouldn´t want you to have trouble with your job" or something like that, which amounts to a threat that he´d be fired if he didn´t do it.
I just went to change petition to see if this was the barrister that wants to reopen the appeal in the uk case and he is. It’s great to see lawyers, barristers that want to see the law upheld and take their jobs seriously and will speak out against an unjust system.
@ Angela O’Donoghue where can we find the petition?
Where is the petition I will sign it
Pls advise where to sign the petition
Ill Sign it!
Sorry I only saw these now, thankfully there’s another video with this awesome barrister that has the link to the petition. I’m hopeless at linking.
If the judges son in the UK worked for the Sun, how was he able to precede over the trial? Shouldn't that of been bias?
Yes, the judge made sure Johnny could never win. The judge was corrupt.
Yes, if true, the judge should be disqualified for that particular trial.
The UK's Justice System is highly politicized. It sucks
The UK trial wasn't about her ,Amber ,it was about the sun statement.
The people that go about saying “well she won the UK trial” definitely didn’t watch it and just started watching the Virginia when it blowed up. Those of us who followed since UK knew all along what was up. It really made the verdict that much sweeter.
Saying she won in the UK is REALLY sad b/c SHE wasn't even on trial. The Sun vs. JD!
Everyone knows the UK cases wasn’t about her. Elaine is just faking. Dr Curry explained all that. That is why most educated people know better
I give props to those who watched this for all these yrs. I didn't know about the UK trial or anything that happened to either JD or AH. I watched the USA trial only because I am a DV survivor. So I started with a open mind and by the evidence presented I believe AH is the abuser
@@nolenepulido5002 but can you possibly believe that there are morons out there who are on her side, I'll be at not many, but there are still people siding with her, and that just makes me sick!!! Many many DV survivors have come out and said, they don't believe a word she's saying but then you have some average schmo who's never been through anything like that hanging on her every word and saying oh poor Amber and Johnny's the abuser, without a shred of proof 🤷
She didn’t win the sun newspaper were found to have not defamed Johnny Depp. It’s not like it was him vs her and it was to see who abused who? That wasn’t the uk case and not even the USA case. So why all her supporters keep saying that she won in the uk just shows how uneducated they are.
Heard's lawyer Elaine was in the UK and she knows well how ridicules and unfair it was for Johnny and that awful woman has the audacity to go on TV programmes and lie and lie, Amb3r has chosen her team well just disgusting people
Elaine wanted her 15 minutes of fame!
@@tiffyyorkshire6124 As the nice TMZ man pointed out so beautifully when she tried to bully him... lol He was so cool 😎
Elaine needs me prosecuted for lying in court and now on any outlet that will hear her. She a disgusting human and needs to have her law license yanked from her.
I at the end felt a little Sorry for Elaine when I heard she went in the bathroom to cry,but after watching/ hearing her lies she is no better than A Hurd.
@@raven4090
He was so cool and an absolute star.
Why has the relationship between the U.K. judges son and the Newspaper the Sun he worked for not been mentioned here? It was biased from the start and was going to have no other outcome as the judge did not want to discredit his own son for slander!
Disappointed in UK s judicial system
Amber Heard: "I didn't punch him, I hit him, that's completely different"
also Amber Heard: "I didn't hire her, she did stuff for me and I made payments to her for her services, that's completely different"
yep.. checks out.
Also, apparently Pledged and Donated - that she uses synonymously, even though they're actually completely different - pledged means promised to give and donated means gave... OF COURSE THAT'S ALSO A LIE! She specifically said DONATED because she wanted people to think she no longer has that money because she "wanted nothing". Ugh.
She didn't 'deck him' though, so it's fine (in her mind)
She's a major gaslighter for her own benefit....always. All narcissists are. She can't lie straight in bed.... She's a 'riddle me this' with menace.
@@arthurdaly3497 Technically no - that's where I can argue. It is NOT fine "in her mind" either -- IF she believed her own lies even a little, she would have been more... well... MORE BELIEVABLE. Since her lies were super obvious, she's spewing blatant malicious lies, it's not some mental illness related delusional thinking. (Again, cuz delusional people are more believable, since they themselves believe it. She can't even convince herself, but tries to convince others by gaslighting and outright lying...)
At this point now that her lies have been exposed, I hope that's exactly what she ends up with, NOTHING!!!
I completely agree with you
I can’t believe that judge in the UK found against Depp? It’s confusing to say the least. That judge should apologize. In my opinion, he should.
He's probably just as arrogant as AH. His son also worked for The SUN newspaper. Connections and woke as a politician!
If you research judge Nicol you will see why it went the way it did. He should not have been the judge on that trial.
Think he retired /left
Crooked, conflict of interest with people behind the scenes judge
@@butterflydiva1 yes he retired
I heard from a lawyer before... There are only 2 types of lawyers: One who knows the law, and another one who knows the judge.
Being "Sarcastic" and "Lying" are 2 totally different things.
As a UK citizen I have the utmost respect for the US legal system having watched this trial. It’s not perfect but certainly better than ours!
Damn! Your system must be really bad!
Agree 100%
@@annacostello5181 Must be a mess in Louisiana too. I have a hunch about it.
Shame about the media bbc sky the guardian all been in favour of amber since the trial
@@NickM_FirstofHisName The UK case was against The Sun, part of Rupert Murdoch’s powerful media empire. Isn’t it odd that despite that type of case usually warranting a Jury, it ended up being decided by just the judge’s opinion. Plus alot of key evidence was not allowed for a variety of bizarre reasons given by this judge. Basically, I smell a backhander. It is not surprising that the judge retired shortly afterwards.
If you have a fancy wig, an important title and lots of money and connections, you are pretty much untouchable.
Also, if you are a male judge ruling against a woman in a high-profile DV/SA case you are pretty much asking to be nationally shamed by the left-wing press.
At 23:54, BELOW 👇🏼 is what Andy was referring to. The UK judge was BIASED due to his MANY CONNECTIONS to AH, her lawyer, and The Sun writer. This caused conflicts of interest that were never disclosed. He should’ve recused himself. The VA judge said justice wasn’t served in the UK case, which is why she didn’t allow AH to talk about the verdict.
1️⃣ Jennifer Robinson (who was AH’s attorney) is friends with Camila Palmer (who is Justice Andrew Nicol’s wife).
2️⃣ Justice Andrew Nicol wrote a book with Geoffrey Robertson (Geoffrey Robertson is a mentor and employer of Jennifer Robinson).
3️⃣ When appointed to the case, Justice Andrew Nicol was employed by Geoffrey Robertson’s legal firm, Doughty Street Chambers.
4️⃣ Jennifer Robinson took AH to a private dinner party in July 2020, during the trial (there were photographs of this event in publications). Also attending that dinner were Baroness Helena Kennedy, and the party was hosted by Kathy Lette.
5️⃣ Baroness Helena Kennedy was also employed by Doughty Street Chambers, and Kathy Lette is Geoffrey Robertson’s ex-wife. They’re close friends with Jennifer Robinson and Camila Palmer (who is Justice Andrew Nicol’s wife).
6️⃣ These women have been supporting AH for years in her UN functions and by publishing their support during the trial.
7️⃣ Lastly, Rupert Murdoch owns both TalkRadio and The Sun. Justice Andrew Nicol’s son (Robert Palmer) worked for TalkRadio at the same time that TalkRadio employed Dan Wootton. And Dan Wootton also writes for The Sun; he is the author of the article in The Sun calling JD a “wife be@ter” - the article that made JD move forward with the libel case against The Sun in the UK.
⏺ This point isn’t tied to the judge, but rather an interesting yet insignificant tie between The Sun and AH. Rupert Murdoch’s son, James Murdoch, joined Tesla's board in July 2017 and is an independent director for Tesla (at the time of the UK trial). Tesla is owned by Elon Musk. Elon Musk dated Amber Heard from May 2016 (while married to JD) til Feb 2018, and allegedly stayed in communication afterwards.
Even if the judge didn’t realize every single connection, he undoubtedly knew most. Even one would be too much. But the judge carried on in the trial and decided that AH’s hearsay claims and speculations were credible (e.g., AH simply telling her story, her “journal,” her taking a text of JD giving a general apology then saying he apologized for ab*sing her, etc). Yet, he dismissed most of JD’s hard evidence, including surveillance footage, emails, audio recordings, pictures, tapes, checks, and even the witness statements of JD’s bodyguard and LAPD members. He also wouldn’t consider expert testimony. He believed almost everything AH said even though she had no hard evidence backing up her claims, there were massive holes in her story, and proof she lied. Justice Nicol didn’t even want to hear that AH donating the $7m was a Iie; in fact, he simply believed her word and said she couldn’t be a “goId digger” b/c she donated the $7m, and if she isn’t a gold digger, she’d have no reason to Iie about her allegations. 😱 He also didn’t allow JD to appeal his ruling. He retired 6 MONTHS later, in May 2021.
The UK trial was completely different than the US trial. UK was the libel case of Depp v NGN (The Sun) and Dan Wootten [not AH]. AH was only their star witness. AH was not a party to the trial so she wasn’t held to the same discovery/evidence standards. And The Sun basically only had to prove that they trusted their source, who was AH. The judge didn’t make AH show ANY concrete proof. And the judge’s ruling was that he found The Sun’s claims were "substantially true." Substantially means “essentially” or “for the most part.”
If you want to see Justice Nicol’s shocking ruling, Iook this 🆙 on G⭕️⭕️gIe:
depp v ngn justice nicol 129 page judgment pdf
(BTW, EVERYONE, FEEL FREE TO REPOST ANY OR ALL OF THIS. HELP EXPOSE THE JUDGE AND DISPUTE AH & ELAINE’S BULL-💩.)
Well done. A lot of these judges are twisted and bought out
Wow! JD never had a chance.
Thank-you for your time to post all of that. Very clear and informative.
@@user-cj8jl6jr5q What are you talking about? Their account wasn’t deleted.
@@ShelleybutyoucancallmeShell thank you. I compiled that list about 1.5 years ago but keep adding to it. I can’t take all the credit though; a lot of Internet sleuths have also posted about these things, some even making flow charts, lol. But I fact-checked each point in my list.
@@user-cj8jl6jr5q hmm, my account hasn’t been deleted.
I love Black Belt Barrister. Thanks for having him on.
Wonderful to hear Daniel’s opinion on this and hear him and Andy addressing the UK trial.
The justice system in UK must be a complete mess if someone like AH can win any trial there. If I were an UK citizen, I wouldn't feel safe living there.
Technically it wasn’t Amber, It was J.D vs the ‘trashy’ Sun news. The Judge shouldn’t of been allowed on that case for his son works for Rupert Murdoch. Filthy bunch.
Amber didn't win. The newspaper he was suing won due to a biased judge.
The judges son worked for Rupert Murdoch, the owner of The Sun so it was a massive conflict of interest leading to a biased outcome.
Amber Heard was a third party and not even credible.
She worked so hard to bring him down what a terrible soul. It’s all coming to the light! I can only imagine the stress he went thru these past 6 years my God. She’s a sorry excuse for a woman better yet a human being. Such a dark soul.
Per WebMD
"Pathological lying is a symptom of various personality disorders, including antisocial, narcissistic, and histrionic personality disorders. Other conditions, such as borderline personality disorder, may also lead to frequent lies, but the lies themselves are not considered pathological. Finally, some people simply lie pathologically but have no other conditions."
That Judge had it in for Johnny. She went to the UK knowing she would get away with it. Shame on that Judge in the UK booo 👎
Her Coming Out And Making A Statement After That Judgement Thoroughly Boiled My Blood 🤬
She's a moron, she just has to have the last word... What infuriated me most on those audio recordings was how she wouldn't even let him get a word out she talked over him constantly God I wouldn't have blamed him for choking her out, she wants to silence everyone when it comes to her having to hear the truth about herself, she wants to ramble on and ramble on putting somebody down but she doesn't want to hear the facts on her own behaviors! I absolutely loathe this woman, I use that term lightly
Yeah me too 😡
Elaine needs to be sued for her own defamation in my honest opinion. She has blamed the jurors with no evidence of looking at and watching media. Elaine and Amber both blame anyone and everyone but themselves.
OBJECTION speculation 😂😂😂
She also blamed the judge, not just the jurors.
So convenient that Elaine only brings up the jury being influenced by social media when she lost the trial. She had a full 6 weeks to bring up her concerns, but she only brigs it up now after the verdict. Such a sore loser!
The Judge in the UK needs to make this right and he or family members knew AH! That doesn’t fly in the US! Shameful Judge in the UK! Period
I am glad this professional see the holes in the UK trial!!