I’m sure Swarovski will eventually make a pair of big glasses because this setup has to be at least $6000 including the required hardware. It’s a great idea but as you mentioned there has to be variations between the pair and you can’t easily adjust the pupillary distance
@@JayScottOutdoors thank you for getting back with me I got the BTX 115 love them but a little heavy for those all day walks I hope my eyes fit those other one I might have to give them a chance next year. Thank you for getting back with me and sharing all you Knowledge!
The reduced weight also helps tripod stability, would love a set of these but will make do with 664 twins for now.. Have you compared the Kowa 664 to Swarovski Jay?
Hi my friend，your videos are really helpful to me and I will follow you forever! Besides that, I wonder if I can extend a collaboration invitation to you. Maybe you will like it. Looking forward to your reply.
Maybe in good light the stc's appear slightly brighter. But in poor light there is absolutely no way dual 56mm objectives beat dual 65mm objectives. There is absolutely no way.
STC have Swarovision field flattener system with wide angle aspheric lenses however this technology fiattener system was introduced by Nikon 10 years ago in their Monarch binoculars and Swarovski very silently copied it and named it swarovision very smartly.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
I want to know the difference 115 BTX and them?
BTX is a fixed power.
I’m sure Swarovski will eventually make a pair of big glasses because this setup has to be at least $6000 including the required hardware. It’s a great idea but as you mentioned there has to be variations between the pair and you can’t easily adjust the pupillary distance
I would want to know the difference between them and BTX 115?
BTX is a fixed power.
Well the little twin STC would be variable power and much lighter than 115mm
@@JayScottOutdoors cool thank you
@@JayScottOutdoors thank you for getting back with me I got the BTX 115 love them but a little heavy for those all day walks I hope my eyes fit those other one I might have to give them a chance next year. Thank you for getting back with me and sharing all you Knowledge!
I can't afford the Swaros 15's I can't even dream to have one of those, my God!
Is there a part 2 with the 15x SLC compared ?
The reduced weight also helps tripod stability, would love a set of these but will make do with 664 twins for now..
Have you compared the Kowa 664 to Swarovski Jay?
Ha ha a big boss set up. Nice!
I think my eyes would be too narrow
Hi my friend，your videos are really helpful to me and I will follow you forever! Besides that, I wonder if I can extend a collaboration invitation to you. Maybe you will like it. Looking forward to your reply.
Maybe in good light the stc's appear slightly brighter. But in poor light there is absolutely no way dual 56mm objectives beat dual 65mm objectives. There is absolutely no way.
@@ryaniam22 don’t forget your dealing with 10 year newer technology in the STC’s 👍🏼
STC have Swarovision field flattener system with wide angle aspheric lenses however this technology fiattener system was introduced by Nikon 10 years ago in their Monarch binoculars and Swarovski very silently copied it and named it swarovision very smartly.