The difference will be very little if any as to details seen. Pentax has a small field of view, other features are quite the same. Both will loose easly with Celestron Skymaster 25x70 or Bresser Spezial Astro 25x70 as to details seen and they are more expensive but the quality of built in case of Pentax or Nikon is much better. I compared Pentax SP 20x60 with cheap binoculars Delta Optical Discovery 16x50 and the difference was really only visible but nothing big, I describe all that on my chanel below videos. Pentax was the winner but by a small margin as far as details where concerned.
You try to say that Nikon P1000 isn't much powerful than Celestron Skymaster but only a little better... In your opinion, is Nikon as powerful than Celestron Ultima 100 at 66x? If I use optical magnification 110x in my telescope TS 110 ED F7 will I see a little bit better some details than in Nikon P1000 at 125x? It would be very interesting to do such a comparison with Celestron Ultima and Nikon P1000. I would watch it many times and will give you likes and comments from several accounts. I compared my Bresser Spezial Astro 25x70 with spotting scopes and even a small spotting scope like Bresser Spektar 15-45x60 showed much more details, it wasn't a huge difference but the spotting scope was a clear winner. They where close only on a very cloudy day when the light was poor. The spotting scope Levenhuk Blaze Plus 25-75x90 shows always much more details even if not in as sharp way as binoculars, in my opinion the difference is huge and is very sharp until 50x, almost like ed glass, it is worse than ed at 50-75x, not a huge difference but visible even for an unexpierienced eye in my opinion.
I have a pair of the 25 x 70 and they are very powerful. But I like my 15 x 70 better. It is very powerful and easier to focus. Great to take to the river to watch barges, boats etc. If you are using for Astronomy the 25 x 70 may be better. Never compared them.
It's because of the "twilight factor" because the objective lenses ( at the front " are bigger on the binoculars, more light gets in, hence a better sharper image, basically the more you zoom in, the darker it gets.
Can you do a comparison between the Hubble telescope and the James Webb please?
With no music?
Nikon 16x50 vs pentax 16x50 compare please thanks
The difference will be very little if any as to details seen. Pentax has a small field of view, other features are quite the same. Both will loose easly with Celestron Skymaster 25x70 or Bresser Spezial Astro 25x70 as to details seen and they are more expensive but the quality of built in case of Pentax or Nikon is much better. I compared Pentax SP 20x60 with cheap binoculars Delta Optical Discovery 16x50 and the difference was really only visible but nothing big, I describe all that on my chanel below videos. Pentax was the winner but by a small margin as far as details where concerned.
@@lightcatcher590 thanks
@@lightcatcher590 but I need 16x50 not 20x60 ofcourse 20x60 field of view is very narrow
What’s the name of the phone adapter for the binoculars? Do you have a link?
Excellent
Next comparison Nikon p900 vs celestron 25 × 70 binocular
Let's see the skymaster 25x70 vs celestron ultima comparison
what is your mobile adaptor model?
I would also like to know please
I wish you had tried more zoom using the iPhone camera.
You try to say that Nikon P1000 isn't much powerful than Celestron Skymaster but only a little better... In your opinion, is Nikon as powerful than Celestron Ultima 100 at 66x? If I use optical magnification 110x in my telescope TS 110 ED F7 will I see a little bit better some details than in Nikon P1000 at 125x? It would be very interesting to do such a comparison with Celestron Ultima and Nikon P1000. I would watch it many times and will give you likes and comments from several accounts. I compared my Bresser Spezial Astro 25x70 with spotting scopes and even a small spotting scope like Bresser Spektar 15-45x60 showed much more details, it wasn't a huge difference but the spotting scope was a clear winner. They where close only on a very cloudy day when the light was poor. The spotting scope Levenhuk Blaze Plus 25-75x90 shows always much more details even if not in as sharp way as binoculars, in my opinion the difference is huge and is very sharp until 50x, almost like ed glass, it is worse than ed at 50-75x, not a huge difference but visible even for an unexpierienced eye in my opinion.
I have a pair of the 25 x 70 and they are very powerful. But I like my 15 x 70 better. It is very powerful and easier to focus. Great to take to the river to watch barges, boats etc. If you are using for Astronomy the 25 x 70 may be better. Never compared them.
I need buy one more for while..... second p1000 and make movie title: " connecting two P1000..world only 125x Image stabilisation binoculars"
It's because of the "twilight factor" because the objective lenses ( at the front " are bigger on the binoculars, more light gets in, hence a better sharper image, basically the more you zoom in, the darker it gets.
But NASA said that there´s no technology to see the flags and rovers left on the moon surface by the apollo mission...kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk.
👍🏼
🙏