Loved this so much! It was incredible to see the size comparison, blew my mind on some of them! If you do another similar vid it would be great to know if they were Herbivores/ Omnivores/ Carnivores etc
I have to disagree with the whole "ignore the criticism" comment. Without criticism, then the OP will never get the chance to be corrected, and I'm talking about constructive/valid criticisms. Negative criticism, on the other hand, are the ones that SHOULD be ignored; you can give critique without being insulting. Not giving criticism, then that means you're giving the OP a pass to keep on committing the same error again; not giving corrections is a disservice, simply put.
I enjoyed this....despite knowing that technically speaking sea reptiles and flying reptiles are not dinosaurs despite living at same time, and Dimetrodon wasn't either and lived before age of dinosaurs. The lot is lumped in with dinos so instead of whining, I'll sit back and see them as bonus material. Once I saw the Dunk in this I knew you're using the common grouping of Dinos (grouping of prehisotric non-mammals) instead of the scientific definition of dinos. I really enjoyed the animation. Instead of generic man walking past prehistoric creatures, they are given a hint of personality. A few of the creatures turn to look at the man and man eventually gets tired and grabs a horse to ride.
@@GsDL another thing i noticed was that several of the models are dated or innacurate, for example, diplodocus never had the frills that jurassic park depicted it to have. another is that carnotaurus’ arm structure is inaccurate. however i am also just a dino nerd and am biased as carnotaurus is my favorite dino.. other than that i really liked watching! i also loved the video of large underwater creatures. seeing the man actually swimming next to them made me realize just how gigantic some of our current ocean life is!
Ad a huge dinosaur fan.... this is enjoyable- but some of the dinosaur models are inaccurate such as the velociraptor, when in reality it had feathers. As well as some bigger dinosaurs did too. Great job on the animation! Looks awesome.🤩
You did a great job with all of those dinosaurs at the end but a couple of dinosaurs were a little different and some were from Jurassic Park and world and some others were from a game that I herd that it’s called ark which I know nothing about but still you did a great job on the video though.
Fantastic video, loved the name-meanings and they all look so cool! The caveman's movements is a very nice addition. I guess we see these images and data, but it's still hard to imagine a living being 40 meters long, walking on land...👍(No dinosaur emoji, damn it!)
Bom vídeo! Mas algumas correções... 1° muitos animais foram usados modelos de jogos e filmes que não estão corretos cientificamente. 2° Alguns tamanhos então errados sendo:
- Ankylosaurus: tamanho próximo do holótipo, mas alguns indivíduos podem ter chegado a 7,5 t. - Triceratops: 8,5 m e 7 t é tamanho médio, indivíduos grandes chegam a 9 m e 9 t e alguns a + 9 m e 10 t. - Dunkleosteus: ~ 5 m e ~ 2 t. - Allosaurus: 8 - 8,5 m e 1 - 1,2 t, grandes indivíduos 9,5 m e ~ 1,8 t. - Plesiosaurus: 3,5 - 4 m e ~ 250 kg - Styxosaurus: ~ 10 m e 2 - 3 t. - Acrocantosaurus: 12 m e 6 t. - Carcharodontosaurus saharicus (maior indivíduo): 12,3 m e ~6 t. - Tyranosaurus rex: 12,5 m e 8 t mas com um indivíduo de 13,2 m e ~9 t. - Bajadasaurus: 13 m e 4 - 5 t. - Giganotosaurus carolinni: (holótipo) 12,7 m e 7 t, mas com um indivíduo de 13,5 m e ~ 8 t. - Elasmosaurus : 11 - 13 m e 3 - 4 t. - Tylosaurus: ~ 14 m e ~ 10 t. - Spinosaurus aegyptiacus: 15 m e 7,5 t (possível 16,3 m e 8,5 t). - Omeisaurus: 17 m e 10 t. - Mossasaurus : 15 m e 13 - 15 t (possível indivíduo 17 m e 16 - 20 t). - Giraffatitan : 21 m e ~ 30 t (possível indivíduo de 23 m e 40 t). - Diplodocus: • carnegii: 24 - 27 m e 14 - 17 t. • hallorum: 30 - 33 m e 25 - 31 t. - Brachiosaurus: 22 m e ~ 32 t (holótipo), 25 m e ~ 48 t (maior indivíduo) - Puertasaurus: ~ 30 m e 55 - 60 t (talvez 65 t). - Argentinosaurus huinculensis: 35 m e 78 - 84 t (holótipo), possível indivíduo com 37,5 m e 96 - 103 t.
More like dinosaur length comparison than actual size comparison, because real size according to science biggest almost always means most massive, aka weight, which is why the Blue whale is the biggest animal ever. Also Giganotosaurus and Spinosaurus are actually lighter in weight than T Rex, Giga coming in at 7-8 tons, Spinosaurus at 6.8-7.4 tons at most, and T Rex at 9-10.4 tons, why T Rex is heavier, because body volume, and muscle mass is much more denser than the other carnivores, and this animal is literally built like a tank, followed by primate level intelligence, it is one of the most energy efficient animals ever in the animal kingdom, their feet are adapted perfectly to be the best long distance runners, quick turning, and energy efficiency, this animal also need all that body mass in order to take down other living tanks such as Triceratops, Ankylosaurus, and juvenile Alamosaurus, also they are now confirmed to hunt in social groups, and thanks to this dig site found in 2021 where a family of 3 Tyrannosaurs related to T Rex that died together in a possible flooding, and this discovery led to paleontologists thinking that all Tyrannosaurs including T Rex were more social than they ever have thought.
It's Pterodactylus, not Pterodactyl. Pteranodon is about the size of a 1.7m tall human Rhamphorhynchus is smaller than Pterodactylus. Aquatic reptiles and flying reptiles are not dinosaurs. Synapsids are not dinosaurs. Styracosaurus is about 1.9m tall (not counting the frill.) Cryolophosaurus only had 1 C-shaped crest near the eye area. Dilophosaurus likely had no frill and had some type of feathering. Estimates say 1.9 - 2.1m, but the one you're showing seems to be the size of a lythronax. Sinoceratops had no holes in it's frill. Bro really used the ARK sprite for the Ankylosaurus Corythosaurus had a bony head crest, not a dome. Really? Another ARK Dunkleosteus? Bruh. JW EVOLUTION ALLO TOO? Plesiosaurus, not Plesiosaura. Also, this one is the ARK sprite and this one looks to be around the size of Elasmosaurus rather than Plesiosaurus. Iguanodon was most likely quadrupedal. T. rex had the eyes too close to the nose, it looks derpy. Spinosaurus more likely had a straight back and had a tail fin. That puertasaurus looks more like a Seismosaurus.
@@GsDL The reason why you're getting criticisms on the word "pterodactyl" is because "pterodactyl" was once used for both as a catch-all for all pterosaurs, and to refer to Pteranodon specifically. "Pterodactyl" is a truncated word derived from the animal "Pterodactylus," and is an obsolete/deprecated word that is no longer used (the preferred word now is "Pterosaur." Here's another: in order for an animal to be classified as a "dinosaur," then the creature has to be placed on either the order "Saurischia" or "Ornithischia." If the taxonomy of a certain animal does not place it in either of these 2 orders, then the animal is not a "dinosaur." Dinosaurs, Pterosaurs, and Crocodilia are groups that are related to each other, and can be placed in the clade "Archosauria" (meaning that they are "archosaurs"). As birds are also the only surviving group of dinosaurs, birds are therefore archosaurs as well as dinosaurs. Synapsids are animals with only one hole behind the eye socket, while Diapsids have 2 holes behind the eye socket. All reptiles and surviving archosaurs are diapsids. Examples of synapsids would be the therapsids and stem-mammals of the Paleozoic like Dimetrodon and Lystrosaurus, and the only surviving synapsids today are the mammals.
Size comparison is cool, but there's so much other inconsistencies that it feels like this was made in the 1990s. Most dinosaurs had feathers, especially dromeosaurs (like velociraptor). And none of their hands were not pronated. Their palms would be facing inward, not down. They are missing so much soft tissue, and most look like shrink-wrapped skeletons. The idea is cool, the data is great, but the visuals are.. well, *bad*.
@@GsDL I hope you didn't take it as a negative as a whole, Like the scale and information was great and the video in itself was well done. I really loved that you included all that info, and not just the common name of the species, like so many other vids do. It's just the images/models you selected were unfortunately very dated. (You're definitely not the only one. The famous case being Jurassic Park, which came out in time when we knew raptors had feathers. And that those creatures in the movie were not raptors at all, because raptors are the size of turkeys.) I hope I didn't make you feel bad, I'm just a dinosaur nerd, and sometimes I can't stop myself from correcting things like these :D
@@GsDL Great video G Data Lab! My comment isnt really "INFO". Just a personal conclusion based on existing scientific evidence for organic bio-mechanical operational thresholds in CEG (Current Earth Gravity). Contrary to current scientific consensus, I maintain 120 000 kg LAND animals are a bio-physical and bio-mechanical IMPOSSIBILITY in CEG.
@@k.t.5405 Would you care to share where you found your info on the CEG? I don't recall ever seeing anything on how Earth's gravity has changed since the Mesozoic era. I'm not discrediting your assumption on Sauropods being unable to live in our time, cause they really couldn't, but I don't think it has much to do with gravity. Instead I think it has more to do with Earth's atmosphere and Oxygen levels. Back during the Mesozoic era, creatures were able to grow to larger sizes due to higher oxygen content in the atmosphere. This allowed for evolutionary gigantism. That, coupled with the fact that our climate today is a lot colder, is the reason I feel why things can't get as big as they did during those times.
@@silversol8476 "I don't recall ever seeing anything on how Earth's gravity has changed since the Mesozoic era." You wouldn't have. Gravitational science is in its infancy, and quantum gravitation even more so. What I CAN point you towards is evidence that gravity on Earth is NOT uniform and that recent discoveries point to the fact Earth is expanding. Both developments that may lead to potential future discoveries regarding major fluctuations in Earths geo-gravitational past. "I think it has more to do with Earth's atmosphere and Oxygen levels. " Is there any observational evidence in modern day zoology or even in the fossil record that would indicate higher oxygen levels or a changing atmosphere would allow a given land animal to bio-mechanically withstand the gravitational pressures exerted by 120 000 kg of body mass? I can tell you there is NO direct evidence either in modern zoology or in the fossil record. After 70 million years of trial and error (post KPG), the only evolutionary path bio-mechanics has been able to find in the direction of a 120 ton animal, has been under water ( a gravity reduced environment),
@@k.t.5405 " Is there any observational evidence in modern day zoology or even in the fossil record that would indicate higher oxygen levels or a changing atmosphere would allow a given land animal to bio-mechanically withstand the gravitational pressures exerted by 120 000 kg of body mass? " I was about to reference ancient Arthropods, but I did some reading on some theories, and it turns out the oxygen content theory was undermined, as more recent studies point that the Jurassic and Cretaceous time periods had about the same amount of oxygen levels that we have today. " After 70 million years of trial and error (post KPG), the only evolutionary path bio-mechanics has been able to find in the direction of a 120 ton animal, has been under water ( a gravity reduced environment) " While older theories do suggest that Sauropods might have been amphibious, recent studies suggest otherwise, due to theorized muscle strength of said creatures, air sacks within their bodies, or their superb skeletal build up. Another recent theory has to do with their egg laying habits. It suggests Sauropods evolved to get so big due to laying smaller eggs. Doing this allowed them to potentially side-step the costs that constrict most mammals to their size limits.
Where is Aust Colossus and Hector's Ichthyosaur? Aust Colossus and Hector's Ichthyosaur is Bigger than Argentinosaurus. But. Aust Colossus Same Length in Argentinosaurus. But Aust Colossus Weighs 265tons. While Hector's Ichthyosaur is 50m Long and Weighs 334tons. They Bigger than Argentinosaurus
Loved this so much! It was incredible to see the size comparison, blew my mind on some of them!
If you do another similar vid it would be great to know if they were Herbivores/ Omnivores/ Carnivores etc
Thank you for the compliment🥹🤝 I will keep your advice in mind😃
most of them are very inaccurate
this is one of the funniest dinosaur videos i've ever seen
Glad to hear that😃🤝
jajaja al final se cansó el cromagnon de tanto correr y fue a por un caballo. Buen vídeo
Thanks for your feedback😃
I love how you have the correct meanings of every animal cause most of them are in greek, so I can understand it anyway ❤
Thanks😃🤝
7:55
Mop
I really love dinosaurs and size comparisons!!!
Me too🥹😃🤝
@@GsDLok🎉😃
Quite a lot of inaccuracies (and unfortunate Jurassic Park clones) but otherwise nicely done.
Thanks for your kind words😃
Hhhh
At 7:40 you see ankylosaurus
@@GsDL the velociraptor is just like blue from Jurassic World 🦖🦕😂
@@yanxinyang3671 😁😅
this was really cool to see, thanks!
My pleasure🤝😃
Amo tu esfuerzo se que te cuesta si ves que hay comentarios que no apresian tu trabajo tu ignoralos no te rindas 😊
Thanks for your warm messages🤝🥹🥹 I am very glad to hear that🥰
Appreciate the amount of work gone into this, ignore the criticism, entertaining watch.
Thanks for your kind words🤝😃
Why is the briacisourus 50,000kg?
I have to disagree with the whole "ignore the criticism" comment. Without criticism, then the OP will never get the chance to be corrected, and I'm talking about constructive/valid criticisms. Negative criticism, on the other hand, are the ones that SHOULD be ignored; you can give critique without being insulting.
Not giving criticism, then that means you're giving the OP a pass to keep on committing the same error again; not giving corrections is a disservice, simply put.
Yeah, constructive criticism is welcome😃🤝
@@GsDL
Thank you, I'm glad you agree.
Thanks For The Great Video🙏🙏🙏... Thanks.
Thanks for your support🤝 I am glad to hear that😃🥹
What
The Liver King wasn’t all about the muscle.. dude has some decent cardio levels too! Really good vid 👍🏼
Thank you for the compliment🤝🥹
Great video!
Thanks🤝😃😃
@@GsDL You welcome!
I enjoyed this....despite knowing that technically speaking sea reptiles and flying reptiles are not dinosaurs despite living at same time, and Dimetrodon wasn't either and lived before age of dinosaurs. The lot is lumped in with dinos so instead of whining, I'll sit back and see them as bonus material.
Once I saw the Dunk in this I knew you're using the common grouping of Dinos (grouping of prehisotric non-mammals) instead of the scientific definition of dinos.
I really enjoyed the animation. Instead of generic man walking past prehistoric creatures, they are given a hint of personality. A few of the creatures turn to look at the man and man eventually gets tired and grabs a horse to ride.
Thanks for your feedback🤝😃 You are totally correct. I still have a lot to learn!
@@GsDL another thing i noticed was that several of the models are dated or innacurate, for example, diplodocus never had the frills that jurassic park depicted it to have. another is that carnotaurus’ arm structure is inaccurate. however i am also just a dino nerd and am biased as carnotaurus is my favorite dino.. other than that i really liked watching! i also loved the video of large underwater creatures. seeing the man actually swimming next to them made me realize just how gigantic some of our current ocean life is!
@@asherbelangia2175 15:10 What frills?
Why is tricerotops 7000kg?
@@asherbelangia2175dilopho have no frills not dippy
Ad a huge dinosaur fan.... this is enjoyable- but some of the dinosaur models are inaccurate such as the velociraptor, when in reality it had feathers. As well as some bigger dinosaurs did too. Great job on the animation! Looks awesome.🤩
Thanks for the feedback and encouragement🤝😃😃
Don't forget that Dilophosaurus does not have those extra frills, and only has those crests on the top of its head.
And at least Dromeosaurs had feathers, and none of their hands should be pointing downwards.
Also dimetrodon was a mammal not a dinosaur
And therizinosarurus has a longer tail
And I'll show you how to die
Also ichthyosaurs had a dorsal fin like sharks
Perfect video!
Thanks😃🤝
Amazing
😃😃🤝
Some dinosaurs are from jurassic park or world and others are from ark
😁
Ggs
Some Dinosaur in this video are not dinosaur 😘
@@TrickyNamaSte EXACTLY.
And the isle like the dryo
You did a great job with all of those dinosaurs at the end but a couple of dinosaurs were a little different and some were from Jurassic Park and world and some others were from a game that I herd that it’s called ark which I know nothing about but still you did a great job on the video though.
Thanks for your compliment and detailed info🤝😃🥹
Love this video, so much effort compared to the others. I love this.
Thanks for your feedback😃 I am glad to hear that🥹🥹
@GsDL where is apatosaurus
@@faichan4148 Sorry I missed it😅
oK
@@GsDL your dinosaur is great and nice❤❤❤🦕🦖
Awesome!!!! Why Not all dinosaurs are moving?
Thanks🤝😃 Some of them don’t have rig, I can add rig and animations to them. But it is too much time-consuming to give up😵
@@GsDL Ok. Thanks for the vídeo
I like that this one gave time periods for each.
Thanks for the feedback🤝😃
New subscriber
Fantastic video, loved the name-meanings and they all look so cool! The caveman's movements is a very nice addition. I guess we see these images and data, but it's still hard to imagine a living being 40 meters long, walking on land...👍(No dinosaur emoji, damn it!)
Thanks for your kind words😃
,დ😂
Mkm7y d
Wow bro it's enjoyable❤
Thanks for the feedback🤝🥹🥹
I like it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤.
So glad to hear that🥹🥰
Nice 😊
Thanks😃🤝
@@GsDL Welcome
Ottimo video
Molte grazie🥹🥹
SANA ALL .. MAY MGA DINOSAURS PA ... 😆🐱🦒
this video was amazing
Thanks for your kind words🤝🥹
Thanks for cute animations.
🤝😃😃
Incredible video!!!
Thanks so much😃🤝
This video deserves a lot of view.Tons of work
Thanks for your encouraging words😃
Dinosaurs Size Comparison:Walking and Running with Dinosaurs:
Archaeopteryx
Dallasaurus
Compsognathus
Pterodactyl
Dimorphodon
Oviraptor
Rhamphorhynchus
Velociraptor
Alvarezsaurus
Stegoceras
Coelophysis
Dolichorhynchops
Dimetrodon
Ichthyosaur
Pistosaurus
Dryosaurus
Prestosuchus
Dakosaurus
Anhanguera
Pachycephalosaurus
Regaliceratops
Pinacosaurus
Tupamdactylus
Sauropelta
Diabloceratops
Styracosaurus
Austroraptor
Cotylorhynchus
Ophthalmosaurus
Gallimimus
Herrerasaurus
Cryolophosaurus
Euoplocephalus
Pteranodon
Dilophosaurus
Sinoceratops
Metriacanthosaurus
Ankylosaurus
Majungasaurus
Carnotaurus
Corythosaurus
Triceratops
Baryonyx
Dunkleosteus
Maiasaura
Stegosaurus
Parasaurolophus
Therizinosaurus
Tsintaosaurus
Allosaurus
Plesiosauria
Iguanodon
Deinocheirus
Styxosaurus Snowii
Acrocanthosaurus
Quetzalcoatlus
Carcharodontosaurus
Tyrannosaurus Rex
Bajadasaurus
Giganotosaurus
Elasmosaurus
Tylosaurus
Spinosaurus
Shantungosaurus
Omeisaurus
Mosasaurus
Camarasaurus
Apatosaurus
Giraffatitan
Diplodocus
Brachiosaurus
Puertasaurus
Argentinosaurus
Thanks for the detailed info🤝😃
Amazing Animals
🤝😃🥹
Nice video! Congratz
Thanks so much🤝😃
soooooooooooooooooooooo cool
Thanks so much😃
Awesome
Appreciate🤝😃
Super film
Thanks for your compliments🤝😃
Thank bro 😁👍 information all dinosaur
Welcome🤝😃
Good
🤝😃
What music did you use?
There are 3 or more music used, but this video is made 2 years ago, I forgot their names😔
good
Thanks🤝🥹
수페르사우루스,브론토사우루스,브라키오사우루스,마멘키사우루스,부경고사우루스,울트라 사우루스,단타티타니스,케티오사우루스,슈노사우루스,오메이사우루스,알라모사우루스,알로사우루스,힙실로포돈,사우로포돈,헤페로니니스,프로가노펠리스,아로켈론,틸로사우루스,쇼니사우루스,모사사우루스,메갈로돈등
Music from ?
I purchased them from Artlist. The video is made two years ago, I am sorry I can’t recall the the music’s name😔
Vamo Argentina!! 🇦🇷🦖🦕😊
👍😃
@@GsDL
Gracias por el corazón 🙂👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Amei adorei
😃🥰
should have been moving faster (joke) Great video
😃🤝
Why does Therizinosaurus got a big but
🤔🤔
Just think about the model @@GsDL
Is the dilophosaurus's height correct?
Things that need's to be right: Brachiosaurus 26meters, Plesiosaurus 3,5 meters, Corythosaurus 9 meters, Dilophosaurus 6 meters, Dryosaurus 3 meters, Bajadasaurus 10 meters, and Quetzalcoatlus 11 meters!
Thanks for the feedback🤝🙂
Facts About Other Cool
Dragons and Mythical Creatures Size Comparison on July 16, 2023?
Thanks for the suggestion🤝 but the time is too short to do it😅 I will make it someday in the future🥹
@@GsDL here’s a list for you to add for the comparison:
1. Fairy Dragon
2. Dwarf Dragon
3. Knucker Dragon
4. Chinese Lung
5. European Dragon
6. Wyvern
7. Ampithere
8. Hydra
9. Drake
10. Chimera
11. Manticore
12. Gryphon
13. Hippogryph
14. Enfeild
15. Unicorn
16. Pegasus
17. Faun
18. Satyr
19. Ipotane
20. Centaur
21. Minotaur
22. Ichthyocentaur
23. Mermaid
24. Naga
25. Harpy
26. Siren
27.Lamia
28. Gorgon
29. Kelpie
@@dragonfire810 Thanks for the info! It’s very useful😃
It was great seeing caveman walk and meet the dinosaurs
Yeah, thank you and the caveman🥹😃
Not everything is a dinosaur shown here
Hard to believe how huge some of these dinos were 😮💨
Yeah😃🥹
Love the video, but the velociraptor had feathers.
awesome
Appreciate🥹🥹🤝
🤩🤩🤩👍👍👍👍
Thanks🥹🤝🤝
Bom vídeo! Mas algumas correções... 1° muitos animais foram usados modelos de jogos e filmes que não estão corretos cientificamente. 2° Alguns tamanhos então errados sendo:
- Ankylosaurus: tamanho próximo do holótipo, mas alguns indivíduos podem ter chegado a 7,5 t.
- Triceratops: 8,5 m e 7 t é tamanho médio, indivíduos grandes chegam a 9 m e 9 t e alguns a + 9 m e 10 t.
- Dunkleosteus: ~ 5 m e ~ 2 t.
- Allosaurus: 8 - 8,5 m e 1 - 1,2 t, grandes indivíduos 9,5 m e ~ 1,8 t.
- Plesiosaurus: 3,5 - 4 m e ~ 250 kg
- Styxosaurus: ~ 10 m e 2 - 3 t.
- Acrocantosaurus: 12 m e 6 t.
- Carcharodontosaurus saharicus (maior indivíduo): 12,3 m e ~6 t.
- Tyranosaurus rex: 12,5 m e 8 t mas com um indivíduo de 13,2 m e ~9 t.
- Bajadasaurus: 13 m e 4 - 5 t.
- Giganotosaurus carolinni: (holótipo) 12,7 m e 7 t, mas com um indivíduo de 13,5 m e ~ 8 t.
- Elasmosaurus : 11 - 13 m e 3 - 4 t.
- Tylosaurus: ~ 14 m e ~ 10 t.
- Spinosaurus aegyptiacus: 15 m e 7,5 t (possível 16,3 m e 8,5 t).
- Omeisaurus: 17 m e 10 t.
- Mossasaurus : 15 m e 13 - 15 t (possível indivíduo 17 m e 16 - 20 t).
- Giraffatitan : 21 m e ~ 30 t (possível indivíduo de 23 m e 40 t).
- Diplodocus:
• carnegii: 24 - 27 m e 14 - 17 t.
• hallorum: 30 - 33 m e 25 - 31 t.
- Brachiosaurus: 22 m e ~ 32 t (holótipo), 25 m e ~ 48 t (maior indivíduo)
- Puertasaurus: ~ 30 m e 55 - 60 t (talvez 65 t).
- Argentinosaurus huinculensis: 35 m e 78 - 84 t (holótipo), possível indivíduo com 37,5 m e 96 - 103 t.
Thanks for the feedback🤝 Very useful comment😃🥹
15:51 Argentinosaurus Is The Biggest Dinosaur
.How to Recognize a Person For Hard Work Stories in Year Wednesday August 16,2023.😐.
🤔
Kenapa tidak Ada indominus rex dan indoraptor 😄
They are man-made hybrid dinosaurs😅
um, would you mind telling me the titles of the pieces in the background music? I want to listen to it. 🙏
Thanks for being interested in my video🤝 Sorry I cant remember their names now😔 I will tell you when I recall them🙂
@@GsDL 🥺 okay 😇
More like dinosaur length comparison than actual size comparison, because real size according to science biggest almost always means most massive, aka weight, which is why the Blue whale is the biggest animal ever.
Also Giganotosaurus and Spinosaurus are actually lighter in weight than T Rex, Giga coming in at 7-8 tons, Spinosaurus at 6.8-7.4 tons at most, and T Rex at 9-10.4 tons, why T Rex is heavier, because body volume, and muscle mass is much more denser than the other carnivores, and this animal is literally built like a tank, followed by primate level intelligence, it is one of the most energy efficient animals ever in the animal kingdom, their feet are adapted perfectly to be the best long distance runners, quick turning, and energy efficiency, this animal also need all that body mass in order to take down other living tanks such as Triceratops, Ankylosaurus, and juvenile Alamosaurus, also they are now confirmed to hunt in social groups, and thanks to this dig site found in 2021 where a family of 3 Tyrannosaurs related to T Rex that died together in a possible flooding, and this discovery led to paleontologists thinking that all Tyrannosaurs including T Rex were more social than they ever have thought.
Thanks for your info. I learned a lot 🤝😃
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I think u guys might’ve mixed up the Brachiosaurus nd Giraffatitan.
They look a little similar😅
appreciate the video but many innacuracies
Thanks🤝 I have still a lot to learn.
why is blue in the video
Bring back Prehistoric Wildlife!!
It's Pterodactylus, not Pterodactyl.
Pteranodon is about the size of a 1.7m tall human
Rhamphorhynchus is smaller than Pterodactylus.
Aquatic reptiles and flying reptiles are not dinosaurs.
Synapsids are not dinosaurs.
Styracosaurus is about 1.9m tall (not counting the frill.)
Cryolophosaurus only had 1 C-shaped crest near the eye area.
Dilophosaurus likely had no frill and had some type of feathering. Estimates say 1.9 - 2.1m, but the one you're showing seems to be the size of a lythronax.
Sinoceratops had no holes in it's frill.
Bro really used the ARK sprite for the Ankylosaurus
Corythosaurus had a bony head crest, not a dome.
Really? Another ARK Dunkleosteus?
Bruh. JW EVOLUTION ALLO TOO?
Plesiosaurus, not Plesiosaura. Also, this one is the ARK sprite and this one looks to be around the size of Elasmosaurus rather than Plesiosaurus.
Iguanodon was most likely quadrupedal.
T. rex had the eyes too close to the nose, it looks derpy.
Spinosaurus more likely had a straight back and had a tail fin.
That puertasaurus looks more like a Seismosaurus.
Thanks for you detailed info. I have learned a lot🤝
@@GsDL
The reason why you're getting criticisms on the word "pterodactyl" is because "pterodactyl" was once used for both as a catch-all for all pterosaurs, and to refer to Pteranodon specifically. "Pterodactyl" is a truncated word derived from the animal "Pterodactylus," and is an obsolete/deprecated word that is no longer used (the preferred word now is "Pterosaur."
Here's another: in order for an animal to be classified as a "dinosaur," then the creature has to be placed on either the order "Saurischia" or "Ornithischia." If the taxonomy of a certain animal does not place it in either of these 2 orders, then the animal is not a "dinosaur." Dinosaurs, Pterosaurs, and Crocodilia are groups that are related to each other, and can be placed in the clade "Archosauria" (meaning that they are "archosaurs"). As birds are also the only surviving group of dinosaurs, birds are therefore archosaurs as well as dinosaurs.
Synapsids are animals with only one hole behind the eye socket, while Diapsids have 2 holes behind the eye socket. All reptiles and surviving archosaurs are diapsids. Examples of synapsids would be the therapsids and stem-mammals of the Paleozoic like Dimetrodon and Lystrosaurus, and the only surviving synapsids today are the mammals.
I appreciate your teaching🤝
@@user-roninwolf1981 You just explained that! Thank you man!
Seismosaurus is invalid species that's now known as diplodocus
This is the most inaccurate thing I’ve ever seen
Hey the sauropod are real
lo único inexacto es tu opinión
@@Hassen00just jumping times like 2 times and i already saw one
THAT IS NOT A DILOPHOSAURUA
so uh ye do some research before being toxic
😂
You’re toxic to dinosaurs?
Good video, but absurd rendering of Spinosaurus.
Thanks for the comment🤝😃I would like to improve it in the future🙂
Stegoceras
Is that an unused JWE Majungasaurus skin?! 7:40
Sorry, I am not sure😔
Argentinossauros porque foi descoberto em um local onde hoje é a Argentina
Como se dinossauro tivesse nacionalidade 😂
😃🥹
👏🏾
🤝😃
Spinosaurus is Old i need New spinosaurus
14:00 Omeisaurus
Thanks for the feedback🙂
Don't Metion It.
Where is the Shastasaurus???[°…°]
Maybe I missed it😅
13:15 maximum T-Rex weight estimates now…
Tyrant chonk king
Where’s kentrosaurus
The First Thing You Know Is Can About Alvarez Was a Compsognathus Ark
Thanks for your feedback🤝😀
12:16 LOLLLL WTH IS THATTTTT
😅😅
Where is the ceratosaurus
Sorry, there are many l missed🥲
half of this is incorrect. But i did like the animation.
😃🤝
Giganotosaurus and spinosaurus are oversized, possibly carchar too. Nice animation tho
Thanks for you info🤝
@@GsDL wlc!
Patagotitan Mayorum from Argentina
Let's Go
Are we just going to ignore wtf is going on with Cotylorhynchus?
😳
Slight error in your fact for Dilophosaurus you have the time when it lived as late Ctetaceous it actually live in the Early Jurassic
Thanks for the feedback and pointing out🙂
ปลาน่ารักมากเลย
😃🤝
That caveman is outrageous
🤣🤣
Why?
Some of the dinosaurs don't very accurate
Yeah, maybe you are right. It’s not easy to comprehend all of dinosaurs. I need to learn more about them🤔
Size comparison is cool, but there's so much other inconsistencies that it feels like this was made in the 1990s.
Most dinosaurs had feathers, especially dromeosaurs (like velociraptor). And none of their hands were not pronated. Their palms would be facing inward, not down. They are missing so much soft tissue, and most look like shrink-wrapped skeletons.
The idea is cool, the data is great, but the visuals are.. well, *bad*.
Thanks for your kind words🤝🥹 I have to improve my skill and knowledge🙂
@@GsDL I hope you didn't take it as a negative as a whole, Like the scale and information was great and the video in itself was well done. I really loved that you included all that info, and not just the common name of the species, like so many other vids do.
It's just the images/models you selected were unfortunately very dated. (You're definitely not the only one. The famous case being Jurassic Park, which came out in time when we knew raptors had feathers. And that those creatures in the movie were not raptors at all, because raptors are the size of turkeys.)
I hope I didn't make you feel bad, I'm just a dinosaur nerd, and sometimes I can't stop myself from correcting things like these :D
Thanks for your kind words😊
any animal beyond the min 15:20 mark is a bio-mechanical IMPOSSIBILITY in CEG (Current Earth Gravity). Instantly crushed under its own weight.
Thanks for your info🤝
@@GsDL Great video G Data Lab! My comment isnt really "INFO". Just a personal conclusion based on existing scientific evidence for organic bio-mechanical operational thresholds in CEG (Current Earth Gravity). Contrary to current scientific consensus, I maintain 120 000 kg LAND animals are a bio-physical and bio-mechanical IMPOSSIBILITY in CEG.
@@k.t.5405 Would you care to share where you found your info on the CEG? I don't recall ever seeing anything on how Earth's gravity has changed since the Mesozoic era.
I'm not discrediting your assumption on Sauropods being unable to live in our time, cause they really couldn't, but I don't think it has much to do with gravity.
Instead I think it has more to do with Earth's atmosphere and Oxygen levels.
Back during the Mesozoic era, creatures were able to grow to larger sizes due to higher oxygen content in the atmosphere. This allowed for evolutionary gigantism.
That, coupled with the fact that our climate today is a lot colder, is the reason I feel why things can't get as big as they did during those times.
@@silversol8476 "I don't recall ever seeing anything on how Earth's gravity has changed since the Mesozoic era." You wouldn't have. Gravitational science is in its infancy, and quantum gravitation even more so. What I CAN point you towards is evidence that gravity on Earth is NOT uniform and that recent discoveries point to the fact Earth is expanding. Both developments that may lead to potential future discoveries regarding major fluctuations in Earths geo-gravitational past.
"I think it has more to do with Earth's atmosphere and Oxygen levels. " Is there any observational evidence in modern day zoology or even in the fossil record that would indicate higher oxygen levels or a changing atmosphere would allow a given land animal to bio-mechanically withstand the gravitational pressures exerted by 120 000 kg of body mass? I can tell you there is NO direct evidence either in modern zoology or in the fossil record. After 70 million years of trial and error (post KPG), the only evolutionary path bio-mechanics has been able to find in the direction of a 120 ton animal, has been under water ( a gravity reduced environment),
@@k.t.5405 " Is there any observational evidence in modern day zoology or even in the fossil record that would indicate higher oxygen levels or a changing atmosphere would allow a given land animal to bio-mechanically withstand the gravitational pressures exerted by 120 000 kg of body mass? "
I was about to reference ancient Arthropods, but I did some reading on some theories, and it turns out the oxygen content theory was undermined, as more recent studies point that the Jurassic and Cretaceous time periods had about the same amount of oxygen levels that we have today.
" After 70 million years of trial and error (post KPG), the only evolutionary path bio-mechanics has been able to find in the direction of a 120 ton animal, has been under water ( a gravity reduced environment) "
While older theories do suggest that Sauropods might have been amphibious, recent studies suggest otherwise, due to theorized muscle strength of said creatures, air sacks within their bodies, or their superb skeletal build up.
Another recent theory has to do with their egg laying habits. It suggests Sauropods evolved to get so big due to laying smaller eggs. Doing this allowed them to potentially side-step the costs that constrict most mammals to their size limits.
Where is Aust Colossus and Hector's Ichthyosaur?
Aust Colossus and Hector's Ichthyosaur is Bigger than Argentinosaurus. But. Aust Colossus Same Length in Argentinosaurus. But Aust Colossus Weighs 265tons. While Hector's Ichthyosaur is 50m Long and Weighs 334tons. They Bigger than Argentinosaurus
Thanks for the feedback🤝 There are many species didn’t pick up because I could not get the appropriate models😅
the animations are great, but a great many animals are wrong. Many of the animals are based off of out dated source material.
Thanks for your pointing out🤝 I will improve my knowledge on dinasours😅
What about apadosaurus
They are not there? Thanks for your info🤝
Rex is the biggest carnivore by 2 tonnes.
This is based on JP/w I think
@@jlordbundang I'm pretty sure that Spinosaurus is the biggest Carnivore
@@ClarinetArtist1999That's outdated information
Fanboys del rex llorando 😭😭
inaccurate from the dinosaur animations, to their size and weight. nice effort tho.
Dimetrodon is not a dinosaur but a early mamal related class, the synapsides.
Thanks for the feedback🤝 I still have a lot to learn🙂