Man, what a shame. Not a lot of movies have prehistoric mammals :( I wish they would have new movies or shows are featured MAINLY of prehistoric mammals.
Ice Age shows a lot of these, and it's a pretty accurate design, too . That is the only movie I can think of. They also have a franchise/sequel, I believe there are 4 movies for Ice Age
I love prehistoric mammals, a bit more than dinosaurs. I feel like prehistoric mammals, that are not wooly mammoths or sabre tooth cats, are unfairly underrated. Like we need to show these animals more instead of just shoving them off because people think that only dinosaurs were around back in prehistoric times. Good video though 👍
This was an awesome video love how it showed how big the animals were. It’s upsetting that they went extinct, would have loved to see them in the modern age.
I like that you, got their Modern Cousins beside the! So we know exactly which Animal Familys are still with us and growing alongside is Humans today. Really brings an interesting concept.
I like how size comparision is done between extant members of the family and extinct members of the family. It makes the difference in size as well as their family grouping clear. You begin to notice some weird morphologies within the family like a the unholy love child of a zebra and a sloth. Or the the horse that had a fling with an elephant.
great video! i really enjoyed the visuals and the way you explained everything so clearly. however, i have to say that while the comparisons are fascinating, it’s a bit misleading to equate ancient mammals directly with today’s animals. some of those prehistoric creatures had such unique adaptations that it doesn't really do them justice to just size them up alongside modern ones. what do you think?
Thanks for your feedback and praising🤝😃🥹 I agree with your opinion that the environment in the prehistoric period is very different from modern age. Because of this, the prehistoric animals had much larger size compared with modern aniamls😃
Agréablement surpris, je suis tombé dessus par hasard. J’ai adoré votre travail. Mais certains commentaires ne me surprennent plus, entre ceux qui sont des spécialistes et apparemment, ne savent pas que c’est très compliqué à cause de là grandes diversités de chaque branche, ceux qui feraient mieux, mais ne créent rien, …ect, jolie réalisation, qui permet de mieux visualiser les choses. Merci !
Si estos animales grandioso todavía estarían con nosotros seria una locura son gigante el mundo se veria mas salvaje pero bueno la extinción existe y es muy dificil revivir 😢
Most of these look like pokemon. If we don't get a new pokemon game with only prehistoric animals, the people in charge of that series are doing it wrong.
this video is really well put together and super informative! however, i can't help but wonder if the size comparisons might give a misleading impression of how these prehistoric mammals coexisted. like, there's a chance some of them could have had very different lifestyles and habitats that aren’t really captured just by size alone. what do you all think?
i really enjoyed the depth of information in this video, it was super engaging! however, i can’t help but feel like the comparison might be a bit misleading. while prehistoric mammals were indeed impressive, i think we should also consider how their ecosystems were very different from ours now. it makes me wonder if size really equals superiority in terms of survival.
Thanks for the praising and sharing your thoughts🤝🥹 You are right, the environment and ecosystem in the prehistoric period is so different from current day, the prehistoric animals had a very different body construction compared with modern aniamls🙂😃
Nice size comparison. My only complaint is the naming scheme for the animals. You weren't specific enough as to what species they are. You just wrote "bear" when there are eight bear species. You could've written "Ursus arctos" or brown bear to make it more clear. Even for the extinct animals you wrote their scientific genus names instead of the full species names. For example, you could've written "Megatherium americanum" instead of just Megatherium. There are like six Megatherium species and some of them were quite different from the giant Megatherium americanum so it's better to be specific
my only complaint is that there are groups missing. Where are the primates? Where's Leptictideon? Many proboscoids are missing, as are ancient whales and hippos
not at all, early humans has existed for atleast 200,000 years, most of these animals lived million of years ago, except for a few like sabre tiger and woolly mammoth
@@yurakolesnikov9725 Earth being 6000 years Old is not a fact but fiction. Earth is 4,3 billion years Old by examining Old samples and meteor crators i dunno where u People get ur information from
@@yurakolesnikov9725people never witnessed dinosaurs lol, not the ones we like to see in media, Humans never interacted with the mesozoic period because we litterally appeared 40 millions years after that era ended Lol
@@GsDL There's a new book out that you may like: The Rise and Reign of the Mammals by Steve Brusatte. It starts out with the first synapsids in the Carboniferous and covers a lot of new research. It's quite readable and has a good bibliography. Brusatte puts the chalicotherium in the perissodactyls with horse and rhinos. The theory is that they would sit under trees and use their long clawed sloth-like arms to pull branches down to eat the leaves. It's certainly a very strange animal, but it"s no more strange than that whales originated in the same group as cows and pigs!
ARCTOTHERİUMA ND ARCTODUS IS DIFFRENT SPECIES ARCTOTHERİUM LIVES IN SOUTH WHILE ARCTODUS LIVES IN NORTH AMERICA ARCTOTHERİUM WAS EVEN BIGGER THAN ARCTODUS
Arctotherium and Arctodus are 2 separate genuses, and also Arctodus is only A. simus, meanwhile Arctotherium has 3 different species, A. angustidens (big bear) A. vetustum (smaller big bear) and another species that I forgot the name of.
Nice. I was under the impression that macrochenia and alticamelus were actually the same animal, with macrochenia being the older name? Did they actually determine that the fossils behind to two different species?
I'm surprised in three months time approximately noone has given you a response containing what you are asking. I don't have the answer, but I'm still surprised that no one else has.
Man, what a shame. Not a lot of movies have prehistoric mammals :( I wish they would have new movies or shows are featured MAINLY of prehistoric mammals.
Exactly, the prehistoric mammals are as interesting as dinosaurs🤝🙂
Ice Age shows a lot of these, and it's a pretty accurate design, too . That is the only movie I can think of. They also have a franchise/sequel, I believe there are 4 movies for Ice Age
wtf
I love having the comparisons between the living animals and extinct relatives.
And I love the music and the guy with the sunglasses. 🤣
Thanks for your feedback🤝 I love them too🥹
Wow, some of these animals look like they came out of science fiction. It’s so awesome that they existed once on this Earth
Yes, exactly🥹
Love this video, my son has watched it 100 times already 😅♥️
Really! Thanks so much! Please say hi to your son🥰
Smart kid. He will know stuff the average person will never know
So many more animals have come and gone it’s incredible.
Yeah, life is so diverse and beautiful!
@@GsDL imagine that there are many animals that didn’t fossilize! 🤔
😊😊😊😊
Pa
Elasmotherium🦏
Glad to see pantodonts finally getting some attention
😁👍
Yeeeeees.
0:39 😮😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
The prehistoric mammals are actually as fun and diverse as the dinosaurs in my opinion, it's a shame not more movies have been made featuring them.
Totally agree with you🤝🙂
Probably the only one I can think of is 10,000 BC… there should be more
Me too brother
🐭🦭🦨🦌🫎🦘🐧🦜🦉🐐🦙🦏🦛 🐘
Astrpoteriom
Amazing video!!! LOVE IT! So nice to get an overview of the prehistoric animals - many of them lived at the same time as prehistoric humans!
08:00 stegotetrabelodon was far more chin than tusk! but these silly old pictures still thrive as the main ones!
Thanks for your feedback!Apologies for my late reply!
I love prehistoric mammals, a bit more than dinosaurs. I feel like prehistoric mammals, that are not wooly mammoths or sabre tooth cats, are unfairly underrated. Like we need to show these animals more instead of just shoving them off because people think that only dinosaurs were around back in prehistoric times.
Good video though 👍
Thanks🤝 It’s just as you said😃
😊😊
Mi sono iscritto, perché mi piacciono questi tipi di video.
😃🤝
Too interesting to see the prehistoric animals, there should be more information about them, they are colossal and beautiful 😊
Agree with you totally🤝 I want learn and make more video about them🙂
Great information you shared which I didn't know previously. Carry on, Waiting for next
Thanks so much😃
Excellent video as regards the Animals' pictures: they are very accurate and almost seem alive!
Thanks! I’m very glad to hear that😄
glh tk
8o97mn b
o0m,bcv(
Description: 10000 years ago
Gut gemacht 👍
Thank you🤝😃
Excellent size comparison I really like animals from this time period
I’m so glad to hear that🤝😃
This was an awesome video love how it showed how big the animals were. It’s upsetting that they went extinct, would have loved to see them in the modern age.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts🤝😃
Very Nice:))
I'm glad to hear that🤝😃
legends says that man walk around all the animals and never gonna break and even SCARED with the dangerous animal
🤝😁
Amazing video
Thanks so much😃
I like that you, got their Modern Cousins beside the! So we know exactly which Animal Familys are still with us and growing alongside is Humans today. Really brings an interesting concept.
I like how size comparision is done between extant members of the family and extinct members of the family. It makes the difference in size as well as their family grouping clear. You begin to notice some weird morphologies within the family like a the unholy love child of a zebra and a sloth. Or the the horse that had a fling with an elephant.
4
Allagator
great video! i really enjoyed the visuals and the way you explained everything so clearly. however, i have to say that while the comparisons are fascinating, it’s a bit misleading to equate ancient mammals directly with today’s animals. some of those prehistoric creatures had such unique adaptations that it doesn't really do them justice to just size them up alongside modern ones. what do you think?
Thanks for your feedback and praising🤝😃🥹 I agree with your opinion that the environment in the prehistoric period is very different from modern age. Because of this, the prehistoric animals had much larger size compared with modern aniamls😃
Iluzja optyczna polega na tym, że ten PAN przebierający nogami nie ruszył się nawet na minimetr.
Interesting analysis😁
Ottimo video
Molte grazie😃🤝
Agréablement surpris, je suis tombé dessus par hasard. J’ai adoré votre travail. Mais certains commentaires ne me surprennent plus, entre ceux qui sont des spécialistes et apparemment, ne savent pas que c’est très compliqué à cause de là grandes diversités de chaque branche, ceux qui feraient mieux, mais ne créent rien, …ect, jolie réalisation, qui permet de mieux visualiser les choses. Merci !
Thanks so much🤝You're absolutely right! Biological species are so complicated. Anyway, making a video is a very time-consuming work😅
Si estos animales grandioso todavía estarían con nosotros seria una locura son gigante el mundo se veria mas salvaje pero bueno la extinción existe y es muy dificil revivir 😢
Most of these look like pokemon.
If we don't get a new pokemon game with only prehistoric animals, the people in charge of that series are doing it wrong.
this video is really well put together and super informative! however, i can't help but wonder if the size comparisons might give a misleading impression of how these prehistoric mammals coexisted. like, there's a chance some of them could have had very different lifestyles and habitats that aren’t really captured just by size alone. what do you all think?
Thanks for praising and sharing your plausible thougts🤝😃🥹
The animals are very nice and neat 😊
Thanks for your kind words🤝😃
EXCELLENT
🤝🥹
i really enjoyed the depth of information in this video, it was super engaging! however, i can’t help but feel like the comparison might be a bit misleading. while prehistoric mammals were indeed impressive, i think we should also consider how their ecosystems were very different from ours now. it makes me wonder if size really equals superiority in terms of survival.
Thanks for the praising and sharing your thoughts🤝🥹 You are right, the environment and ecosystem in the prehistoric period is so different from current day, the prehistoric animals had a very different body construction compared with modern aniamls🙂😃
Imagine if these prehistoric animals never went extinct
Very interesting🥹
Not only that he thinks smilodon was a tiger sad
Well, they're both felids.
Oh No! The doedicurus is mistakenly called a… DEINOGALERIX!
Thanks for the feedback🤝 Yeah, there are some mistakes I made😔
Nice video. You however have seemed to miss my hog. It’s number 1 on the list
🥹😄
Why does the Argyrolagus look like a jumping mouse?
Maybe they are relatives😅
XD
Not everyone of course.
😅😅
I don’t understand
Land Mammals didnt reach size of dinosaurs if we talk about in each niche.
Thanks for the info🤝🙂
Ok I like this alot but I have questions about this thing 5:46 the Embolotherium
Thanks for your feedback😃 If you have any questions, maybe be this would be helpful en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embolotherium
The man walking with complete confidence.
Haha, he was too calm in this situation😁
yes😅
Muy buena aclaración en comentarios!
Thanks for the feedback🤝🥹
I love that every animal got downgraded so that we could have a chance at fighting them 😂
😅😅
Is the Deinogalerix in this video not a Doedicurus or other type of Glyptodont?
Thanks for your comment.🤝Maybe it is. l will check it later.
Super
Thanks🤝😃
... rumor has it he continues his virtual saunter past scary beasts completely unscathed ... oh no wait -
Also i think thats a good model for paraceratherium since its head was heavier than a elephants
Thanks for your comment😃
@@GsDL np
7:50 Mumakill were real?
Yeah, it was real😅
Great size of magnificent animals
😄
Chalicotherium was more closely related to horses than to sloths
Thanks for your info🤝 Maybe you are right!
They were also related to rhino's and tapirs, so it's not exactly wrong to say there was rhinos with knuckles
The Smilodon Populator was bigger than the barbary and American lion. Barbary lions weren't that big.
Thanks for your info🤝 I will check it.
I think barbary lion is about the same size as the african lion in the video
@@aioac5865 no barbary lions were smaller compared to African lions. That's a big myth that they were huge and larger than African lions.
@Emily Harris which information?
@Emily Harris the only reliable weight of barbary lion is 243kgs (N=1), all other estimations are wrong.
Nice size comparison. My only complaint is the naming scheme for the animals. You weren't specific enough as to what species they are. You just wrote "bear" when there are eight bear species. You could've written "Ursus arctos" or brown bear to make it more clear. Even for the extinct animals you wrote their scientific genus names instead of the full species names. For example, you could've written "Megatherium americanum" instead of just Megatherium. There are like six Megatherium species and some of them were quite different from the giant Megatherium americanum so it's better to be specific
Thanks for your comment! Very useful advice🤝 I've learned a lot, appreciate!
@@GsDL
No problem! Overall I think your video was really good btw. I hope you make more!
Jeez…
my only complaint is that there are groups missing. Where are the primates? Where's Leptictideon? Many proboscoids are missing, as are ancient whales and hippos
Thanks for your comments🤝It's exactly as you said, there are a lot of animals I missed. I would like to learn more!
Crazy to think ancient peoples walked among these massive animals
not at all, early humans has existed for atleast 200,000 years, most of these animals lived million of years ago, except for a few like sabre tiger and woolly mammoth
@@RaverzUnitedz Considering the fact that Earth is probably 5/6k years old and people witnessed dinosaurs and prehistoric mammals, is amazing
@@yurakolesnikov9725 Earth being 6000 years Old is not a fact but fiction. Earth is 4,3 billion years Old by examining Old samples and meteor crators i dunno where u People get ur information from
Humans are animals
@@yurakolesnikov9725people never witnessed dinosaurs lol, not the ones we like to see in media, Humans never interacted with the mesozoic period because we litterally appeared 40 millions years after that era ended Lol
The Paraceratherium was the biggest land mammal to have ever existed, you depicted it wrong.
He was not comparating by size but by family
no actually its the straight tusk elephant.
Well I do love prehestoric animals
🥰
5:46 the embolotherium doesn't have a mouth
why is chalicoterium not together with horses?
Thanks for your comment🤝Some studies say it is almost immune to classification and has no living relative. Anyway, there are a lot I need to learn!
@@GsDL There's a new book out that you may like: The Rise and Reign of the Mammals by Steve Brusatte. It starts out with the first synapsids in the Carboniferous and covers a lot of new research. It's quite readable and has a good bibliography.
Brusatte puts the chalicotherium in the perissodactyls with horse and rhinos. The theory is that they would sit under trees and use their long clawed sloth-like arms to pull branches down to eat the leaves. It's certainly a very strange animal, but it"s no more strange than that whales originated in the same group as cows and pigs!
@@GsDL bot
This is why our ancestors told Mythology and stories if you would see them now you would think it's unbelievable.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts🤝🥹
3:29 Arctotherium? I hear it called Arcthodus
Thanks for your info🤝 I will check it later.
ARCTOTHERİUMA ND ARCTODUS IS DIFFRENT SPECIES ARCTOTHERİUM LIVES IN SOUTH WHILE ARCTODUS LIVES IN NORTH AMERICA ARCTOTHERİUM WAS EVEN BIGGER THAN ARCTODUS
Arctotherium and Arctodus are 2 separate genuses, and also Arctodus is only A. simus, meanwhile Arctotherium has 3 different species, A. angustidens (big bear) A. vetustum (smaller big bear) and another species that I forgot the name of.
Nice. I was under the impression that macrochenia and alticamelus were actually the same animal, with macrochenia being the older name? Did they actually determine that the fossils behind to two different species?
I'm surprised in three months time approximately noone has given you a response containing what you are asking. I don't have the answer, but I'm still surprised that no one else has.
@Emily Harris and there's the answer...thanks.
@Emily Harris Thank you got that! I'm significantly older, and the last I'd heard, they were supposed to be the same thing.
I like the Dr. Seuss Toucan Koala most.
._.
So, stop the American lion is not one of the largest species of cats, reaching a weight of up to 400 kg, why the hell is it so small here?
Thanks for the feedback🤝 🙂I still have a lot to learn and improve my knowledge about this.
Nice but the embolotherium is creepy and cursed
😅
That’s not a deinogalerix. It’s a doedicurus.
Thanks for your pointing out🤝 I will examine it.
@@GsDL Yeah, you have Deinogalerix down twice
@@thenickhelms84 I will check it too
The doedicurus is accidentally called a deinogalerix instead. That is incorrect.
Seems like things devolved 🤪
I love this comparison due to those animals being related
I am very glad to hear that😃
Ookkk.
Hello, what is the song name please?
Hi, there are several songs in the video. I am sorry I don’t remember their names😔 I purchased them from Artlist.
Please do Prosimians and Primates leading up to Homo Sapiens next......................
Homo (s)apiens
@@Dr.IanPlect Yes, my bad!
видео огонь
2:02 Eurohippus: I’m small
😳🥹😃
Orohippus: I look like a quagga
The deinogalerix isn't even a glyptodon animal
Thanks for the feedback🤝
this is insane to think about. like, THOSE were once walking about??
Exactly🥹
There are some researchers stating palaioloxodon mamadicus to be bigger than parceratherium!....
Thanks for telling this. I will check it🙂
50 Mya nature just shrugged it's shoulders and did the "I don't know" mumble.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts🤝😃
What about the Terror Birds?😮
There are only mammals😅
a young paraceratherum is the size of a Morden adult rhino
And the aldut is mostly indestructible
Thanks for your info🤝
I was waiting for the Gorgonopsis but it never appeared.
😔
Ah yes my favourite prehistoric mammal
Hedgehog
Weasel
Armadillo
Koala
Is not prehistoric is Modern
@@AAlizade-et5yt thats what i'm trying to say
I guess these are the cousins are the animals we see today
🤝😃
No palaeoloxodon namadicus is height 5m to 5.2 m
I will check it🤝
Lol he thought diprotodon was a koala dude did not research much also that giant armadillo was doedicurus
Paraceratherium have 4,8m height palaeoloxodon namandicus have 5,2m
Wow😮
I like so much
Thank you so much🥹🥹😃
Where is gigantopithecus?
Thanks, I should have added it into the list😅
Gosh, nowadays these animals are starting to look more and more like Pokémon.
Maybe you play Pokémon games too much😅
I don't know a lot about prehistoric animals but some of these look like they came from someone's imagination.
Wow the giant sloth is insane
🥹😃
🥹😃
Urggg so much misinfo, such as oversized models, incorrect temporal ranges…
Deinogalerix was the siz of a car…
No monke?
Forgot them😵
I didn't see the woolly rhinoceros, the cave bear, or the dire wolf in this video.
😅
You should have included hippopotamus gorgops and wooly rhino not just elasmo
Thanks for you feedback🙂
thank
We just have nerfed phrestoric dinosaurs and mammals
All wrong names and.. what the:
00:37 Actually is a Doedicurus
Is that kirk cousins?
2:49 for all of you who don't know, the smilodon is a saber toothed tiger!
Thanks for your info🤝🙂
Is boar related to entelodon
Yeah, I think so🙂
Hum…. Talvez eu espero o Arctodus simus
Maybe I wold like to be Palaeoloxodon antiquus🥹😃