I'm Fijian born but grew up in Australia and married to west African. We are told in Fiji our ancestors came from East Africa,Tanzania. Stories passed over the centuries that our ancestors had issues with nearby tribes and moved from central to the coast. They had the same problem in the coast and decided to sail as skills in boat making and navigation gained. Thailand, Malayasia also have Negrito people that live in the bush. Some words and cultural custom we practice are similar to east Africa. One can look at ancient Fijian hair style and garments also. We have seen identical Fijian art patterns with some African tribes. We believe God had sent us out away from everything in preparations for the last days
@@roscius6204 well you have to convince the education system. Fijians are melanesians with Afro hair and black skin. Fiji out of all the other melanesian countries have mixed blood esp from polynesians but majority of people have Afro hair and black skin. Afro hair can only come from Africa.
EDIT: I thought the playlist was incomplete, but I was just looking at the wrong one. Here is the playlist for this series: ruclips.net/p/PL1v9pqs4w1mwrGlCET76Rs99Fx0EfJXE4 Here is the one I had seen before, for the new and ongoing Jeanson series ruclips.net/p/PL1v9pqs4w1mzxnSlpFs-QmE-cAFm12398
I am indigenous on my Mother's side. I have questioned the narrative for a long time and do not believe the mainstream history that we are told. I have a very good understanding of the Bible and know that what we are taught is a lie. Thank you for your research and YaHuWaH bless you 🙏🇦🇺
I love listening to Answers In Genesis. They challenge the status quo- keep it up. Two things to note that it’s not dealt with here but need to be addressed is 1.) the current Japanese people were not the first settlers of Japan. They took over from the Ainu people. This needs to be unpacked. And 2.) the genetic link between the people of South American and the Australian Aboriginals. It seems like there was a migration from Australia to South America. Please look at this and include it in future work.
@@piked261 I hope you don’t mean the Bible as it’s the only true and reliable source we have. Ever considered that the bible was always the one that had the stories and other cultures used parts of it for they’re own beliefs?
@ClementGreen meaning we have egyptian hieroglyphs in Australia, and two of the Aboriginal gods of dreamtime actually may be representation of the egyptian gods Osirus and Annubus. That kind of connection. Meaning the Aboriginal could have decended from Egypt. And this also may be a reason why Egypt had so much gold. There is also evidence and Canaanites in North America. Which this can show that within the very first few hundred years from the flood event and the tower of Babel humans very quickly spread all around the globe.
This is so interesting. I’m American and my family’s oral history indicates that we were already in America and not a product of the transatlantic slave trade.
This guy is trippin Oz has been heavily populated for thousands of years.. 500 tribes spanning the whole country before colonisation. Oldest living culture on earth.
I lived in Lae, New Guinea for two years. When the tribes assembled for a “Sing-sing”, they were VERY different in looks. Especially the Buka or Booka tribe, whose skin was true black and they were taller than most other tribes. I learned that there are over 600 different dialects among these peoples. It is a true mystery to me how the tribes have maintained separate physical attributes and languages over tens of thousands of years. Perhaps this is important.
Thank you for this research. I am a Maori from New Zealand and we have Y-dna tested our Father to try to find our historical lineage. This video is very helpful and amazing. Is there any further linguistic research or relations to the Maori peoples origins.
Good one. Nathaniel is definitely pushing Creationism into new frontiers. Praying the Lord's protection and strength for him and Ken and everyone at AIG.
They came to Australasia via the coastal India… after they left Africa. We are talking about a journey - from Africa, via India etc - that took tens of thousands of years. It didn’t happen in a single trip over a couple of months, lol.
Looking at the migration of the Vikings also suggests that ancient celestial navigation played a key role in the movement and migration of peoples to new lands and territories. References to the sun and moon as gods and orientation of ancient buildings suggest a strong relationship to celestial navigation and seasonal planting/harvesting and behaviors related to the solar equinox.
Looks like we are all related in some way and don’t need to be divided by racism at all. What a wonderful world we could have if everyone accepted this. Thanks for your work.
Accept and let's move on a my cozzi lol 😂🤣 after all Noe s ark was discovered exactly where the Bible said the mounts of Ararat . Ron Wyatt discoveries . Armenia. Now Turkey .
Nope, we aren't. Most anything on you tube is approved by liars, or we should say, all university material and public "knowledge" by this type of study is false for the fact that it is manipulated through the eyes of one group, and that group descend from Cain, who's father was a nephalim, and Esau, who married into the Cainites, that you know as Canaanites, who are nephalim.
It's the white race that teaches they people to hate people of colour and difference , they are only becoming educated through Social Media, and finding out that they are connected through the races. They need to change ,because they are killing off their heritage, to make just a white race,they don't even see ,what us indigenous see, and that's interracial relationships are scattered throughout the globe, and have been for a centuries. We are connecting to truly what we are,white people aren't the 35:15 superior race, they are just a race.
I read a research study about the connection of Polynesian people with the coastal Alaskan people. Their conclusion was that people crossed the Pacific to Alaska first then settled Polynesian. Their evidence was based on DNA, ocean currents, and language similarities. The easiest migration routes may not be ones actually used.
I have a screenshot of a site that shut down, it tells of ironstone slabs with Phoenician writing. 1 says "Ships sail from this land under the protection of Yahweh to Dan" It's in a museum owned by Rex Gilroy in Tamworth. Another says assemble here to worship Ra the sungod. It gives the name of the country used by Hebrews as Sinim, the Egyptians called it Punt and the Phoenicians called it Ophir. Ophir is the eleventh son of Joktan who was born when the earth was divided. Could this be when the ice that fell during the flood, along with the inland lakes bursting their banks and forming grand canyons which are on other continents apart from north America? This water being withheld made walking to Australia / Sinim as Isaiah called it in chapter 49 & verse 12 possible.
Thank you for this post which relates to my patrols of the Pacific in the mid-1960s. These patrols included the Marianas Islands, Bonin Islands, Japan, the Philippines, East and West Caroline Islands, IndoChina, New Britain part of New Guinea, the Soloman Islands, eastern Australia, Fiji, Samoa and much of Oceana. These locations were populated by the groups you featured in this post. Conversations with the islanders and members of the Peace Corps yielded fascinating insights.
Archaeologists used to think that people walked from Siberia through an ice-free passage down Alaska and Canada, reaching the interior of the United States about 13,000 years ago. In recent years, however, well documented earlier sites like Chile's Monte Verde have convinced most archaeologists that humans made it deep into the Americas by 14,500 years ago, meaning that they would have had to cross Canada long before an ice-free corridor existed. The human foot prints found in White Sand, New Mexico date back to 25,000 years ago.
Thank you for your fantastic video, l have always found this topic soo interesting. As an ex Australian Navy sailor who have sailed the world and experienced soo many peoples and found how difficult people can look in the same country.
I have learnt very little considering the amount of questions asked by the presenter. That makes this film 40 % speculative , 40 % questions and 20 % fact. It could all be summed up in 10 minutes. Very little new facts since 10 years .
Thank you both, men of GOD. I remember picking up my first Jared Diamond book and being so dissatisfied and here you have done such amazing work. As you mentioned, this is ground breaking and the movement pattern is almost that of escaping war. The legacy people's seem to have in thier culture very determined territorial and 'peace' observing rituals. Maybe this is a carry down of tradition from this era
Indonesian has many ethics groups, but most of them, except the Papua and Maluku, has 80-90% similar face features, for example the Javanese, Sundanese, Melayu, Maduranese, Balinese. But sometimes, i think because mixing with other ethnic such as Chinese, Arab, India, which maybe start happen in 300-500 years ago and still happen right now, you could find they has similarity with those ethnic group. For example, you sometimes can find Maduranese who has white skin and face features almost like Chinese, or the face resemble India or Arab. Also for Sundanese and Javanese sometimes you can find they have light skin; maybe from Arab or Chinese, also sometimes even they have brown skin, their face, especially the eyes like the South Chinese ethnics. Also to be noted, majority of Javanese and Sundanese, I find have similar face with Thai people. And some of Sundanese similar to Philippines people. Also, the Dayak people also have similarity with South Chinese people, and Vietnamese people
Interesting but problematic - Went to an Auckland Museum presentation about 10 years ago that explained origin of Pacific Island and NZ cultures was not via land bridges but via Wakas (canoes) using memorised star charts for navigation. Basically, Thor Heyerdahl's theory of South American origin via balsa boats was genome incorrect. Their evidence was the common North Asian genome (above Vietnam). It is a common problem for land dwellers to not think like maritime people, in that the sea is a highway, not a barrier. The Pacific island's human genome has high correlations and interestingly also matches the genome of the Madagascar peoples via wakas. They also determined a match via the genomes of their domestic chickens and the maritime rats. Also archeologists found similarities in pottery. Dating is recent at 3000 years ago. It is also incorrect genome-wise that Tasmanian aborigines were earlier/different to mainland Australian Aboriginies, this explained via a somewhat racist and incorrect approach to lead us to think that the current Australian First Nations people displaced an earlier people, therefore it is OK for white settlers to displace them. Please I need some citations here. The other issue is migration path for a non-maritime people, we are lold vi a land bridge across the Torres Straight when ocean levels were lower. Please also, is it disingenuous to look at a face and make race judgments? Saying "They look like..." is insufficient and the genome must be the evidence. In your genetic testing, are there any Australian First Nations genomes leaving a genetic trace through Indonesian and PNG?
@@ayianaarthur2551 I think your comment is unfair and does not take into account the notion of Terra Nullius. They did fight - I used to work near a suburb named Pemulwuy, named after a noted warrior who fought to defend traditional lands. Spears and Woomerahs were not effective against mounted rifles. Organised massacres took place, along with practices such as stolen children and abuse and servitude of children, forced assimilation, forced deletion of culture and language, forced removal and relocation from traditional lands. Add in biological techniques such as blankets infected with smallpox and poisoning of natural drinking water sources. I believe the histories of Canada, US, Africa and South America all have similar colonisation stories. (We recently read of graveyards of many first nations Canadian children near resettlement schools.) Aboriginal people had tribal lands with well defined borders that included hunting and fishing rights. This was an organised society and tribal borders were well-defined in traditional artworks. ANMM has curators that can explain how this practice worked. Interesting that when Captain Cook careened the "Endeavour" at what became Cooktown, he was not attacked as this parcel of coastline was a lawful sanctuary where local tribes could safely meet and were not allowed to fight. A few miles each way, and Captain Cook might never have made it back to England.
The Aborigines were in Australia first, but they migrated there from elsewhere. They didn’t grow out of the ground. They migrated, just like everybody who came after them.
@Jim Rolfe Yes they may not have been "nations" as we perceive them today, and I am not sure why you have to focus on 'stone age' - Back 60K+ years ago, we were all stone age back then, and all people's origins stem from East African rift people via a migration path. The colonisation of Australia that took place from 1788 was either 4K tears or 60K years after Australian Aboriginal migration (depending on your view). Then also, the Europeans came from the same East African rift people, but with a much more complex genetic background and a lot of intermingling.
@jimrolfe2894 if you apply the same logic to say, Scotland. Well Scotland was made up of hundreds of nations.. Now you see how stupid that sounds. It doesn’t help anyone to perpetuate a lie.
@14:45 in reference to the similarities between languages that seem to have a base language. It's like growing up playing a board game with "house rules"... all the kids grow up and put their "spin" on the rules to standout slightly, but the rest of the family can still play along....
to me aboriginals were still in garden of Eden metaphorically, they basically gardened their landscape or the land so that it supported them not like planting flowers but like manipulating your environment so it produces what u need its not quite farming and its not what we think of gardening but i think its the best word, I think that, this sought of existence is what the bible is referring to when it mentions eden.
our aboriginal ancestors were hunters & gatherers- only taking what they needed to survive (food, shelter, medicinal, ceremonial) giving thanks & replenishment
@@bon5436 not entirely true they did manipulate the nature around them they created small ponds off rivers for fishing, probably harvested and planted some yams and also used fire to create small pastures in areas for better hunting of roos and to replenish the landscape and probably and alot of other things that are lost.
@@jasonmckay8793 how you gonna tell me it's not true . I only said a couple of things and NOT ALL !! i know this. But I am Australian aborigine my grandparents lived the old ways and passed down information so DON'T TELL ME ITS NOT TRUE!!!!
Some very good docos on early NZ races have been made and in terms of languages there are traces of Celtic, Middle Chinese and Ancient Sanskrit influences. The legends suggest that some very early colonists were from the Aboriginal peoples, but those of Celtic descent were also present early on, and later on were those from somewhere around India who lived in South America before being driven out in wars.
The original people in Zebulun, New Zealand, were white, and the later arrivals, the Maori today, hunted, raped (mescegenated with them) and cannibalised them. That was about 3,500 years ago. That is where the traces of white culture are, and always seem to be attributed to Maori, who do that Haka, which is the war dance from when they declare that they will literally consume the enemy. They were loathsome, and are still the same.
My ancestors came to the Americas thru mountains of ice and ice caves. I think in the long run, there are three language bodies in the Americas. Yet, there are also words common from Siberian natives to the Tierra del Fuego. Shon is one, with variation like shah, both mean to change as in a shapeshifter, usually a witch.
So if he's proposing that the Olmecs may have been descendants of the dark skinned family group that made up Africa and South-Asian Islands, wouldn't it make more sense that Africans came over via the Atlantic route instead of the Pacific route, since it is easier to travel by boat across the Atlantic than the Pacific? Plus, more discoveries in Africa are pointing to much more developed civilizations than previously thought.
I don't believe only one group of ancient Africans went only one route there many Evidence that many tribes exist throughout other part of the land that travel to these lands from Africa in different era of times .. Thank for that point of view👍
Isn't that what "The Ra Expeditions" was about? (I'd completely forgotten about that until reading your message.) The Pacific is calmer than the Atlantic, so perhaps a Pacific route is more practical.
This is awesome! I've been trying to do this exat thing, using various data to map out the history of mankind (using languages, technology, archeology, etc). But ancient history is so hard to study with all the bias towards evolution models. It's really nice to get information from a researcher who considers what the Bible says. Thank you! ♥
I've looked through things, but when researchers might give the same, or scattered tribe different names, hide information etc, it gets very hard. It's very fortunate that the while Maori middle eastern heritage, and white people in New Zealand when they came, was off the crush radar, and I could find a number of areas/names which Maori could be derived from. If it was a popular thing to be swept under the carpet at that stage, I might not have found much.
He is not thorough enough. We need to start back in time as well, and move forwards. There is genomenomad or something, with videos that do a bit of that. But they are too fast with too little text, but I got an idea my suspicions are correct. If you go to Wikipedia, they center y haplotype F on India/Indus region, with a lot of the haplotype genetic diversity spreading from there. I suspected that it likely could be a range of positions, that the original people need not be the original location. I was suspicious it might be an Indian identity thing. Sure, enough, there is one with a nice radial pattern spread out, and others with locations nearer the caucuses as I suspected. Looking at the ancient DNA spread in those nomad videos, we see that they shove F on a long link then the immediately sub types of F, mainly concentrated near each other in the Caucuses, or near it. Which indicates to me, a likely hood that they started there, and F did, and F could have split off in a other direction, maintaining a separate identity. It's worth looking into.
Amazing work of the of DNA research and Thanks you . I always believe that all people on the earth came from the generations of Noah, as it is written in the Scripture. Genesis 10: 19 ; " Theses are three sons of Noah :and of them was the whole earth over spread. "
You should check out the series called skeletons in the closet. It's a 3 part series on the history of N.Z. and Polynesia. Some Hawaiians believe their ancestors came from Alaska. In New Zealand some native tribes say they came from Persia and India. Supposedly NZ was occupied when discovered by Maori also
I think there was an earlier Polynesian wave of settlement I think the Maoris met these people as they arrived the mori ori they called them. Or there is the other hypothesis of fair people coming from perhaps north Antarctica southern south America across the isles at an earlier point perhaps after the flood 9000bc ish it seems less likely. As for coming from India or Persia its totally possible I think we underestimate how much people move and how dynamic our past is.
i do not believe for a split second any pre european contact maori had the slightest clue persia or india exist. maori come from taiwan originally i thought? they obviously came from somewhere in asia.
It seems clear to me that humans have never been a species splitting into very many races or subspecies in a divergent evolution. On the contrary, it seems that very many different subspecies or races have been mixing, not only during the last 5 to 10 thousand years or 50 to 100 centuries, but for the last three thousand of centuries since there have been found archeological evidences that show that modern humans lived 3,000 centuries or 300,000 year ago. Human subspecies, or races, have always been interbreeding and still are, when opportunity makes it possible. The path has always been convergent, and never divergent!
WAR; One aspect of this dispersion didn't seem to be covered here is the aspect of warring neighbors. Throughout history we have evidence of mans desire for control and mans inhumanity to man. It's my opinion one driving force in the spread of civilization would have been tribal conflict. More established and stronger tribes gaining possession of desirable lands and the weaker being forced to move out and away for preservation's sake. In Australia (as in America) we have been told the Aborigines were one unified nation, where in reality there were over 250 tribes many in constant strife with each other. We find many tribes in the interior surviving in grossly inhospitable country. I don't believe they chose these areas by choice when other tribes a hundred or so miles away were dining on mud crab, lobster and barramundi. The need would be to spread out for greener pasture.
Well wasn't it fortunate that we white " christian "folk came along , killed many of them, deprived them of their lands and culture and 'civilised them " so now many of them live in the most inhospitable lands, with no work , terrible facilities and health , we've exiled them in the places we don't want as they are deemed worthless and we have the coastal strips and more liveable areas.
I'll tell you something Bud !! My ancestors were given large land grants in Australia. They were true Christians and regarded all Races equal therefore to take the life of and aborigine to them would be murder. It's the blessed catholic church that promoted evolution for it's own benefits. Your lovely Darwin stated that Kalahari bushmen and Australian Aborigines were closer to monkeys than human. They took their lands and killed because that gave an excused to take their land. The Stolen Generation was stolen by the catholic church to convert them and increase their numbers NOT THE TRUE CHRISTIANS ... OK!
@@shillout7270 Darwin was Unitarian, Catholic Church was originally hostile now, doesn't have a position.That's google consensus pages of it. Enjoy your large land tracts and keep up the distraction technique🙄
@ 44:14 I was shocked some years back to see the peoples of eastern Siberia when dressed in their traditional garments and riding their traditional mode of transportation and speaking in their native tongue looked and sounded EXACTLY like these people, so I was convinced that our Native Americans migrated from there, I mean these eastern Siberians could enter the U.S. today and be mistaken for modern American Indians even dressed in modern clothing.
Hi in the Altia region, going into the Mongolian and China region, is the oldest blond haired fair skinned graves found. There has been found graves relatives between the area and the Caucuses. They were at a time in western China, and weee moved on after a war with the Chinese, then being invaded by Asiatic tribes. I am unsure what the eras were, but maybe this fits in, as you your graph shows movement above this area into America.
@@wadej347 Yes, they recently found a undisturbed tomb several hundred feet or meters under the mountain, giving a clear genetic signature of a most "beautiful people" if it is the regular population.
@@wadej347 They are talking about a long time before that. I think it was tens of thousands of years on the conventional time line. It's very hard to tell with the manipulation of time lines.
We traveled through Iceland across the land bridge between Asia and Alaska through the Americas, from the land Of The bear to the land of the emu. And we inhabited all these lands for thousands of years, we then inhabited Antarctica and moved to Australia and we never once encountered a white man, so if white man didn't come from a black man where did they come from. The history of the world can be told in Australia. Atlantis is in the Pacific.
We Italians call the regional variations in our language Dialects, I speak straight Italian and I’ve gotten the hang of siciliano and Napolitano. Every region have a dialect of their own and some of them are totally different than Italian by any standard. Most of what you’re speaking on is the reason for that mostly Rome after all brought every ethnic to Rome and I guess I’m happy of that because that primordial milkshake LOL is what created todays Italian ethnicity to some degree god gave use our beautiful ethnicities…. Nathaniel might like this observation, being older lol first generation Italian in America the years that I grew up(the big migration of immigrants) I was able to experience and I observed that the Italian language in America has even mutated this is due to the Italians as all ethnicities all typically stayed together in areas of the country but that put many people that spoke mostly dialect so they all got smashed together and all kinds of new words were created just because of dialect and! I find a large reason is just ignorance and miss pronunciation…
My wife is filipina and I am Australian had dna done and she has exactly the same dna native marker as I do. I assume that some of the Australian Aboriginals come from the Negrito Filipino's.
The latest group of hominides found to be the oldest to live according to the beginning of group thinking and social organization were on the north of Africa around 300 000 years ago (Marocco) Prof Hubelin (French) worked with a German university and Moroccan research centers, was dated with the latest thermo-luminescence system. Then groups were found to have seeped out of Africa towards all directions, then turning around, meeting other groups, mixing and then separating again. In Africa the first hominides that resembled Sapien started running around 2 million years ago, maybe the first groups left Africa, then were followed by new groups of hominides for the next 1.9 million years, running along coast lines and through areas where hunting and gathering, ice level, sea level .... which never stopped evolving. I live in Geneva Switzerland, which 28 000 years ago was covered by 900 meters of ice. Ice covered so much of Europe until 10 000 BC that the tribes of the "north" were bound to stay under the level of Paris not to be under ice. During that period, the sea level was 150 meters lower than current times. Most coastal life dating 5000-10000 BC is now underwater.
What an incredibly interesting video this has been! My great great grandfather wrote three of the languages of South Australian Aboriginal peoples. His name was Clamor Schurmann, Google him up and you will find out that this is true! I love your Ark , Ken and I wished that we had one here in Australia. By the way in Victoria, Australia there is a place called Ararat, I was always disappointed when I saw no Ark there when I was a child! Haha! How nieave was I. I love listening into all of your facts about this world based on Biblical Facts. Keep up the Good Work that all of you do! GOD Bless you all! 🙏 Your sister in Christ, Julie
How many of the Aboriginal tribes had/have writing and how many don't? Did he help create the writing or did the Aboriginal people already have writing? I am interested in good Bible Translation groups and have been trying to keep up with the good and bad translation groups. Even then I still love the stories about some of the different groups of people and their writing as compared to ours.
One of the US astronauts spotted a something on Mt Ararat from orbit resembling a ship. Archeologists went there and have found a ship in the ice. Due to wars in the area further investigation is difficult.
One thing to note about the language families: Is it right to think that Hebrew belongs to Afro-Asiatic language family & Indo-European is a different language family? For example, Greek alphabets alpha, beta, gamma, delta are clearly derived from Phoenician/Hebrew Semitic language: Aleph, Beit, Gimmel, Dalet... So, not only the alphabets, there must be many other similarities between so-called 'Indo-European' and Semitic languages. When I was learning Hebrew about 3-4 years ago (abandoned the attempt for now), I realized similarities between the Hebrew language and English (even in the similarities between how A B C D.. are written vs early Phoenician versions). Not only that, I found that some words were similar in Hebrew & Korean (I was living with Korean friends) - for example, the word for father in Hebrew is abba & in Korean it is abeoji (same root - ab), and the word for water in Hebrew is Mayim & in Korean it is Mul. There were other similarities, such as in Hebrew a word for God is Ha Shem, which means The Name, and is sometimes used synonymously with Heaven - Ha Shamayim. In Korean, the word for God is Haneunim (which means God and is equivalent to Haneul, "Heaven" + nim, "Lord"). Not only that, my Korean and other Indian friends were surprised at the striking similarities between Dravidian (a branch of Southern Indian languages) and Korean language - even when there is no physical resemblance between these two people groups. And interestingly, I saw an English movie where the protagonists traveled to a village in South America, and the native South American woman referred to death in her native language as "Moth" - which is the same word for death in Hindi (India). There are no recent or known connections between South American native peoples and India, and yet this word was common. Also, the word for death in Hebrew is "Mûwth", and in Sanskrit it is "Mrtyu" or "Maran". Modern Hindi uses "Moth". Anyways, all curiously start with M. The more I have had exposure to different disconnected languages, the more I had occasions to find similarities among them.
The main point is the predicament of languages being attributed to certain families, when there have been striking & often deeper similarities between un-connected language families. This is a point (much deeper than the problem of races) I had long been wanting to point out - and this platform gave me an opportunity. Notice what I have written about striking similarities between Dravidian (Southern Indian) languages & Korean language (3rd paragraph in my first comment) - when the peoples are from different races & their languages come from un-connected language families. So, this is not about race, but about something more profound, which Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson here probably did not take into account - probably because in his research he took the so-called language families as one of the starting points in his further research without questioning & getting to the details of the categorization of language families themselves.
Also, if you place Greek alphabets/Phoenician alphabets/Arabic alphabets together, you would find that none of the three languages have their alphabets that as so similar (one-to-one) that they could be called 'copied'. So, the analogy with Australian aboriginal languages being written down in Latin letters is also flawed. Yet, there is a greater similarity between Phoenician alphabets and Greek alphabets than between Greek & Arabic alphabets. However, even if the Phoenician alphabets were merely copied to the Greek alphabets, then there must be other similarities as well. Cultural or literary assimilation (any part) does not happen in isolation. If there were other similarities, then what is the point of putting them into different language families?
It is very interesting that these groups occupy areas within a certain longitudinal plane. What navigation by the stars could have played a part in migration by sea between these land masses?
Go to 'SKELETONS IN THE CUPBOARD - THE UNTOLD HISTORY OF NEW ZEALAND', There is a Maori tribe with white skin, green eyes and red hair. Their Genetic is mainly Ancient Persian. Maui was said to fish NZ out of the sea in mythology. He is said to be an Egyptian. Interestingly Mauritania is linked to Atlantas and King Atlas / Atlas mountains, and are called the Mauri. Also, the Maori vowel sounds are the same as Italian. Maori were able to pick up Italian easily during World War 2. There are some Maori tribes who don't want to scratch too hard below the surface.
The Annunaki were in Aotearoa first. One encountered by Hatu-patu. The accounts of Ishtar show a similar personality in the birdwoman story. Esau had Hazzel eyes not green Redhair. Esau was Hebrew. Toi eyes haircolor same.
How does this theory account for the differences in technology? Australian Aboriginal people do not use arrows, never mind metal tools, both of which they would presumably bring with them as they go into unknown lands? Probably seeds and animals as well for food and medicine.
The Aborigines have their technology, like the boomerang. Don't forget that much of Africa was not advanced in metalworking. The Maori peoples had the lowest types of tech.
@Jim Rolfe so they didn't have boiled water but knew about aerodynamics for thousands of years how do you explain that little titbit where Europeans didn't discover it until the 1800s each to their own in the evolution of our respective species the australian people evolved in their own way they didn't need war tools as much as the rest of the world do and they were concerned with recycling way before most other races hence why their tools were made of natural materials and valued nature more than wealth or ownership
@Jim Rolfe putting words in people's mouths i said we evolved differently in our own way no need to get butthurt snowflake and as for going back to an earlier existence do you want to regress backwards or move forwards how do you explain boomerangs then i guess they just waited for Europeans to bring those with them all bow down to the superior race now explain how aboriginal pictographs are right across thew world predating your man made book
@@davidnetherway4734 Im not an expert but where has this come from? They didnt understand aerodynamics, they knew how to throw spears and make boomerangs. Making a paper aeroplane does not mean you understand aerodynamics. They didnt recycle, making a tool from a rock and some wood is not recycling. They fought regularly, constantly against each other. They have found evidence of tribal genocide. Id like to know where or how you learnt this?
The southern Africa to south America route across the south Atlantic is more likely. Its a shorter route and faster and even easier if its Ice age sea levels because currents will take you from west Africa to Brazil/ Uruguay. My hypothesis is that the first people out of babel that traveled fastest were those with boats on the river. They followed the coasts after leaving the river which if sea level was lower would have reached to the strait of Hormuz. They may have loitered in Hormuz area until ice age and sea level changes pushed them to keep moving with family groups separating with some boats going south and others east. The boats were good coasters not rafts or canoes but still small 4 -6 meters. They had simple sails and paddles. Both the southern and eastern fleets had a mix of languages and perhaps less that 50 people in 12 boats. The may have had animals trussed up or in small basket cages, mini arks. The southern group skirted Arabia and Africa dropping numbers of as people settled. One or two was swept to the Americas on reaching the south Atlantic shores. The Eastern group went coast hopping to south east Asia dropping off people in India, Indonesia, and There another split happened. Indonesia is a ice age barrier. What's islands today is all land with the Mekong flowing down the middle between Borneo and Java. The river mouth may have been a current barrier. Those successfully crossing colonized the Philippines, northern Papua New Guinea and some made it to Japan. Those caught by the current are swept to Australia landing on the shores of Sahul; the joined Australia and New guinea. I am assuming that these fleets would have sailed for no more that 3 to 5 years so their populations would have established themselves in far flung places within 5 years of Babel's fall. We probably need to chat Nathaniel. Check Facebook.
That's crazy talk if your theory holds water then please explain how Australian aborigines have existed more than 50 thousand years longer than the existence of Babel let alone it's fall. It disgusting to attached ancient people's to a made up story written by uneducated goat herders in the middle East when they have existed so much longer than. the very oldest part of Jerusalem was settled 4200 bce yet aborigines culture was unchanged since 45000 bce so the ancient ancestors of those who wrote your book where still brand new comparatively
@@Jameswoodgo The dating labs have an inherent bias built into the design of the processes that has been challenged in experiments and proven wrong. If you send them stone that is known to be recent but lie, say its probably old, you get the result matching the lie not the truth. This has been done with rocks from many recent volcanic eruptions. Mount saint Helens most famously. Everything is cross calibrated to long age assumptions. I believe the aboriginals got to Australia within a few years of the Babel event and that was early or just before the ice age. Watch one of the other videos it deals with the dating lab problem.
There were People who had come from Australia living in Brazil and Chile 40000 years Ago including footprints in Volcanic Ash Dated with Potassium Argon Method on a Mayan Dome Volcano People have migrated in both directions at various times accross the Baring Strait most recently the Blakfoot crossed 6000 years ago with the Type A Blood Factor of Noongar, Yzidi and Soumi Finns
In that Brazilian Museum that was burnt down there was a Skull that dated 12000 years old 20000 years ago and older in the depth of the Ice Age the Ocean Levels were 123m lower as there was a Polar Ice Cap Glacier over the North American Great Lakes - Canada & Alaska would have been a very difficult place to live
"misleading title" you hav,nt even started to make a FINAL REVEAL on australia. eg 2 very different tribes in sth australia shared a common border one being ngaiwang (Polynesian) & the other negrito on the eastern bank of the Murray river with two distinctly different burial sites & both exceeding 50.000 yrs
@@Quackzine search NGAIAWANG on wiki. that will get you started I lived on country for 20yrs my contributions are at adelaide uni. as a footnote if your interested search captain Sturt & Edward eyre they were instrumental in the subjugation of the tribal capital MURUNDA aka murundi a permanent settlement with stone buildings & extensive farming practices upstream is their burial grounds ROONKA-ROONKA on Murray stay in touch if I can. be of any further assistance JOHN
If there are so many different language families in Papua New Guinea (PNG), then why could there not also be many different language families in western South America? Perhaps the reason for the many language families of PNG could help uncover the history of western South America.
Great engaging documentary 👏 👍. Thank you for putting this out there, my thoughts were already along these lines, but you've perfected the theory and made it so clear and concise! Very much appreciated 🙏 👍
@@RealHooksy It is far better than the completely made up and ridiculous, failed theories of the big bang and the evolution of matter, evolution of the stars, evolution of solar systems, evolution of planets, evolution of life from non living mater, then, evolution from a singled cell organism for non living matter, to a human being and the 50 million plus of genetically diverse and individuals, of which there are some 50 million species on this planet! Now THAT is bollocks! This is the uni (one) verse (line or phrase) that brought all things into existence, which explains time, space and matter, all in one verse. (Genesis 1:1) "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
I believe native Australian people didnt come from Africa. I just don't see a connection and I know people disagree. Btw I have a lot of respect for certain proclivities of the true Australian Aboriginal people.🇭🇲🌿🙏
I think the resourcefulness of our species proves our ability to travel by sea. Ships or raft canoe designs are clearly evident. So like Vikings migrations occur if unimpeded. This timing is possibly climatic.
Ah Genesis chapter 11; makes mention of the changing The One Language in to Many. Why is it people ignore the timeline in Bible History all these events took place after of course The Great Flood. Where missing some thing crucial from these Bible stories that is okay there was a vastly different World Before the Great Flood at one point our World was identified by another name besides Sheol/Earth, today Geology and for some insane reason Paleontology agree upon this narrative, that Earth was once 1 Super Continent today it is referred too as Pangaea kind of why the Continent's look so much like broken Jigsaw Puzzle pieces. 2:) in Genesis & 7 says that The Flood Gates of Heaven were opened and the Fountains of The Earth sprang up, think of a common Human error a leaving the Kitchen sink on an it runs and runs till it overflows and spreads across the Kitchen straight into The Dinning Room; if water isn't mopped up soon it's going into your carpet if not taken care a musty moldy smell then develops. My point after the Flood the one big continent became 7 so yes there were other people here they were Pre-Flood dwellers. After, The Tower was left incomplete due to God changing 1 language into many the plan for us to scatter and really populate the Earth is possibly since I'm not God what The Creator wanted for Us. As I've said each Person's considered indigenous are where their Ancestors migrated too after Tower of Babel. Evidence that other people once lived there is because They lived before The Great Flood. Did you know recently PBS did a long series in to The History of Indigenous People's/Native America are as most would prefer to be Identified as Sovereign Nation's that they mention cities that were built by the gods even named after those gods. I admit this part I'm about to divulge would be A Theory at best but, honestly its all I have for now till God shows me something else and He Has been. In each Ancient Civilization has anyone wondered about these precious word's? In The Beginning, different stories are introduced by diverse Civilizations that once thrived though they be dust an no more those Stories thrive and continue to fascinate us much of those stories are used to teach philosophical principle such as The Story of Icarus. So here's the Theory up until Adam and Eve to The Tower of Babel Earth's inhabitants spoke Hebrew. Of course With Tower of Babel God introduces many languages thus ethnicity is Born. Now after The Great Flood Noah and his Family would have told the next Generations the Oral stories of the World that existed before The Flood and it would have been related in Hebrew. Then Babel Happens and the stories once said in Hebrew becomes changed as well The Name's of The People before The Flood in Hebrew becomes another name the now spoken many language's. What they did and how they lived before the Flood is changed to because a word are phrase didn't exist in that New language itself. The point is The Ancient Relatives were teaching Oral Stories of The World Pass they were still the same stories but, the question would be getting back to cities built by the gods, our Bible Tells us there are No other gods but for The Holy Trinity, question who got cast out of Heaven because they started A War there. All the ancient structures are built as though something was attempting to re-create A World they'd been Banished from once more God Created Us from The Earth in his image 1st Adam then Eve. Adam was led to Eden He wasn't created There. The Animal's were sent to Eden so Adam would take care of Them; but, they weren't Created in Eden. Who then built the cities of the gods? That's places where very old structures stand today which the World marvels at when visiting the structures. When immigrants migrate elsewhere do they not bring a part of who they are with them and replicate the Homeland of Their Ancestors as example.... Chinatown, Japantown, Germantown, Little Italy (why Frank Sinatras Mother could speak 40 different languages from Italy). Does one not see the culture in those specific Town's in question? After, banishing Adam and Eve and expelling all the animal's out from Eden why would God have 318 Angel's block the entry into Eden to keep people out but, who else Did God not want in That Eden of Earth and who had access too Eden in Heaven? An was kicked out of Heaven for The War; He Started of his own Free Will?
I forgot on a side note something that confirms a hunch and it's only a hunch till God says otherwise to me. A while back I watched a 30? or 40 minute video on the Akkidan's here on ytube regrettably haven't seen it since, The Sumerians pertaining to the earliest pieces surrounding The Epic Poem Gilgamesh. The person was sharing their perspective on the topic with regards too how it was written, and sharing that at some point there is confusion with the writing itself. This pertaining to The Second Oldest Epic Poem on Earth, Gilgamesh. The writing in the person's opinion seemed to be going in one direction all the while tipping in another way; but, in the story, it seem's as though The Scribe's are quote writing gibberish an none of the initial writing made sense. There was an curious amount, abundance of annoyance; in the person's voice discussing Gilgamesh. Thankfully the annoyance in their voice perked up my ear's, The Writing of The Akkadian's? The Sumerian's? In The Time of Our Ancestor's Writers were in fact referred to as "Scribe's". A Scribe's Calling in that Era, was to record the History of The World; which was often dated usually by The World Before and After The Great Flood. The summation of the Akkadian's Scribe's within Sumeria, the short video, I listened too here on ytube, emphasized discrepancies within Gilgamesh's Story. Here's my point I believe The Scribes who was writing about Gilgamesh is direct evidence, for the moment, God Himself; changed Earth's 1 Language, into Many Language's, many Tongue's. Based on how the person introduced Akkadian's format of writing; The person said it was confusing, those word's themselves; appear to be going off into many different directions that made no sense to Them. An too me this evidence is when God changed The Universal Language. Picture it as The Tower of Babel is being Constructed; Scribes are busy recording this grand moment and other moment's of History that is to be a crowning achievement with the completion of the Tower, soon to become dubbed "Babel", when there's a shift. The sudden use of something alien something never heard before until now, the language's are thereby changed, and so is the Dream completion of The Great Tower now Babel is over. I just wanted too share that since, I had brought up The Great Flood, 1 Language changed to Many Language's with the Construction of The Tower of Babel. In my last post I forgot too add this Bit.
I saw a Smithsonian documentary around 5 years ago that came to kind of this conclusion that aboriginal Australians 1st settled Americas but put the time line at 20k yrs ago.
That’s how I found my Dad and his side of the family. I didn’t have his name or wasn’t told anything about him. I was able to trace the family through my 23&Me matches.
@@SpicyTexan64 health concerns, nothing to do with who is your emotional family. Every woman in my family had a hysterectomy or died of a female cancer. My father died of colon cancer, just like his father before him and his father before him! Colon cancer does not skip generations is what my doctor told me. It is important to have a family medical history, that is why!
Can I recommend you label this series with which episode # they are. We have to just hunt and hope. For example, no episode 16 or what ever for this one. Will aid viewers follow the intended sequence
Some of just got some weird genetic throwbacks i think. I'm half Filipino and Scottish descent and people have assumed I'm from places as far as Hawaii and all over the pacific even to Japan and Korea with a half Korean girl actually asking me if I was part Korean and people from New Zealand asking me if I'm from New Zealand. Maybe it's the Spanish connection and that's where the crazy mixing started happening when they were in the Philippines 🤷 but you know there's something strange when people from places you're not actually from think you're from there. My mother has even questioned where I got my looks and says I don't look like anyone in the immediate family and says I look like the "old people" of the islands. She also told me she has a light skinned cousin who married a light skinned Filipino and had a negrito baby. Those genetic throwbacks again. I've often wondered if I'd be able to travel the entirety of the pacific and have people think I'm just some weird local hybrid lol My father also had children with an Australian Aboriginal woman so it seems I'm related to half the world 😆
"Rumours of people in Australia before Aborigines" from a guy in pub. Sounds about fair. If I like what I hear it MUST be true. All of this I call the Cinderella's Sisters Effect (CSE). You've got a shoe and by God you are going to make your foot fit it.
Exactly He creates little urban myths to say "hey I'm not the only Australian who believes this" A "pre" native Australians would still be considered a native Australian anyway right lol
I was always told I do not have relatives near me. Turns out that is not true. There are a bunch of my relatives around, but they all hate my side of the family.
HOW OLD is aboriginal culture 60,000 years There are varying estimates for how long Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have lived in Australia, however, upwards of 60,000 years is what current research reveals. A two-metre-long painting of a kangaroo in Western Australia's Kimberley region has been identified as Australia's oldest intact rock painting. Using the radiocarbon dating of mud wasp nests, a University of Melbourne collaboration has put the painting at 17,500 and 17,100 years old. As for the Aboriginal people , they have been screwed up by missionaries , many of whom helped authorities to steal their kids , stopped them from speaking their languages and brainwashed them into thinking that biblical religions were superior to their own beliefs. Most indigenous people have had their culture destroyed by Christians ,due to their religious zeal and bizarre intent on 'saving ' them, due to their incredible conceit in their thinking that they are 'superior". For most of them , being "saved" involved dying from communicable diseases ,deprived of their lands and herded into enclaves supervised by christian jailers.
Australian aboriginals from what I have gathered have never been united as a group. There were many tribes that were constantly at war with one another. It is very possible they would have wiped each other out.
@@anthonythistle1465 A false narrative you have been indoctrinated with. Whilst not a united people, conflict between tribes was very rare amongst the various tribes.
@@bottplug2272 Indeed. The weapons they carried with them in the old days were for hunting purposes only, the fact that the Native Police were of different tribes from the ones they were used against was purely a coincidence, and the animosity between different aboriginal groups even today is all the whitefella's fault ...
When you say "show up right here", blind folks are left out of knowing where "right here" is; so also with folks, such as myself with 20/800 farsightedness sitting 10 feet across the room from the screen. Even had I my nose to the screen, I would require at least fifteen, maybe thirty or forty, seconds to "digest" that, which you said, before you go on to the next thought. Listen to Prem Rawat!
There were people on New Zealand before the Maori arrived. Maori legend tells of them, there were different kinds of people, from some who were very small Hobbit type of people to others. The Maori killed them all off
Austronesians originated in China - Riverine and maritime East Asian mainland, with the Yue people who were from mainland East Asia (modern China) tattooed and master mariners… but from the mainland NOT just Taiwan. These Yue or Yueh people were displaced by other people and spread throughout the Pacific. That is why one can find people with the classic Pacific Islander, Melanesian-Polynesian square head and generous lips… people who look like Māoris from New Zealand, but live in Hunan in central South China, and in Hainan Island in South China.
The aborigines are from the India Bangladesh area that’s why you get people in them areas that look like Australian aborigines there was no sea in between India and Australia at one point and the aborigines and Maori said there were whites on New Zealand and Australia before they got there
This guy is speaking more in relation to what he studied but not at all on any actual reseach he has done. People keep in contact with your elders. He's doing what they have done throughout generations. He's feeding you his--Anglo-story of your existence.
Popular consensus is the Aboriginals travelled across a land bridge via India ➡️ SE Asia ➡️ PNG ➡️ Australia, upto 60,000 years ago. Melanesia is part of this tree. Polynesia comes from the islands of the greater area of the China Sea. The islands of Melanesia were already occupied by cannibals/headhunters from the earlier migrations hence the Polynesians moving further out into the Pacific Ocean to set up camp.. There solved! There was also a migration from Madagascar to the Andamans and perhaps Australia (still debatable).
And you know that how? Not because you were there, but because other people with their own opinions they got mostly from others, told you that they were there. Fundamentally, we don't really know, but this guy is trying to figure it out. If you strongly disagree with his findings, start studying and get in there and figure it out for yourself. I'd be very interested in what you come up with. But, be sure you go into the research with an open mind and no preconceived notions, which is tough to do.
@sammcrae8892 I know because others have studied it. This nonsense about having to be there applies to everything, particularly to books like the bible.
I live in Australia and my background is Greek , some of the Greeks I know look like polynesians. I also know some Greeks that you could mistake for aboriginals.
Please tell your recherche team to search for the term ,vibes of cosmos on RUclips for the true maps from the moon map. This will help you and will make things make more sense. Love and light to you
@8:13 India was called Hindustan on every map at the time of Columbus. A mis-translation of Columbus writing in Portugese when his 1st language was Italian ...Columbus referred to to people of America as En con dios which means "In with God" but mispelled the phrase in dios which the word indios means Indians translated to English.This is what the late great Russell Means a Lakota Sioux activist,award winning actor who became a tribal elder and Chief of The Sioux Nation before he passed
You can find many articles discussing found DNA links between South America and the Australian Aborigines. I dug and found something about the Mixe people in highlands Oaxaca, Mexico and a DNA link found to Australia. This is pretty much Olmec territory.
Think back to before the continents separated, we are taught no one lived back then, but it is possible that a society lived on the one huge land mass that existed at this time. I believe humanity has existed far longer than we have been taught.
You can't teach what you don't know. The cradle of civilisation was in Syria but was destroyed due to the muslim fanatics. There are far older civilisations being discovered but you can only educate as you discover.
I believe humans existed when there was two supercontinents and those two continents broke apart much more recently than we are taught. Approx 1million years ago. Aboriginal ppl seeded the southern continents whilst a section with them on it broke off W.A. and sent colliding into the Eurasian landmass I.e. India
@@bottplug2272 Look at Australia mate. Its the oldest plate on the planet. Life started here. Humans started in Africa but everything else originated from Australia. A million years tracks nothing. There are plants so old their evolutionary pattern can only conclude a planet billions of years old. Then there's the soil and few connections Australia holds with the few other continents like Africa with the Boab trees. Genetics also backs up the migratory pattern of humans which is then backed by pottery and evidence of camps.
My suggestion is Africans that ended up in the Philippines, Andaman Islands, Australia and New Guinea were the first migration. Note how they have survived to be found in remote places. I suggest the second migration of Asians conquered and destroyed those Africans that remained on their trade routes and their paths of expansion. Those "Chinese"" were probably technically more advanced, defeating and dominating in most places, thus African DNA diluted. I suggest Papua and Australia were missed due to remoteness or lack of good reason to venture that way. I'd suggest that missing genetic clues to prove this were mostly eaten, rather than bred with as conquered subjects. Horrible to to bring up historic cannibal practices, but war and such has always been a good motivator to emigrate and discover new lands and riches to plunder. Such would explain holes in the genetic path today, knowing there was a route of emigration, but that route mostly lacks evidence. It appears that what remained of the Africans had no interest in going to sea, whereas those from Asia had interest to expand for on the seas.
I don't get what this has to do with the bible, of course humans spread throughout the globe in ancient times, what's your point? Why are religious people this deceitful when trying to justify their book that was written by people who were ignorant of modern day science and discoveries?
![ROSÉ (로제) - number one girl [더 시즌즈-이영지의 레인보우] | KBS 241129 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/A9oByH9Ci24/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm Fijian born but grew up in Australia and married to west African. We are told in Fiji our ancestors came from East Africa,Tanzania. Stories passed over the centuries that our ancestors had issues with nearby tribes and moved from central to the coast. They had the same problem in the coast and decided to sail as skills in boat making and navigation gained. Thailand, Malayasia also have Negrito people that live in the bush. Some words and cultural custom we practice are similar to east Africa. One can look at ancient Fijian hair style and garments also. We have seen identical Fijian art patterns with some African tribes. We believe God had sent us out away from everything in preparations for the last days
Genetically speaking, Fijians are actually Melanesians, those cultural similarities are coincidental.
but... you're not African. Sooo
@@roscius6204 thats correct Im not African. I was highlighting the Fijian ancestral connection to Africa through stories passed down
@@jfotofili But there's no DNA to go with that. So the stories of past travel are simply from where ever your DNA came from.... but not Africa.
@@roscius6204 well you have to convince the education system. Fijians are melanesians with Afro hair and black skin. Fiji out of all the other melanesian countries have mixed blood esp from polynesians but majority of people have Afro hair and black skin. Afro hair can only come from Africa.
Please number your videos so we can go through them chronologically without interruption for these lovely episodes, keep up the good work guys
i will agree it is very hard to follow the series without it
They have a playlist. So far, it's gone in order.
Just click on his channel, go to videos. They’re always in order of date of upload. Start at the bottom.
EDIT: I thought the playlist was incomplete, but I was just looking at the wrong one. Here is the playlist for this series: ruclips.net/p/PL1v9pqs4w1mwrGlCET76Rs99Fx0EfJXE4
Here is the one I had seen before, for the new and ongoing Jeanson series ruclips.net/p/PL1v9pqs4w1mzxnSlpFs-QmE-cAFm12398
You are getting it free of charge. Stop being an entitled lazy pig and put some of your own effort in.
I am indigenous on my Mother's side. I have questioned the narrative for a long time and do not believe the mainstream history that we are told. I have a very good understanding of the Bible and know that what we are taught is a lie.
Thank you for your research and YaHuWaH bless you 🙏🇦🇺
I love listening to Answers In Genesis. They challenge the status quo- keep it up. Two things to note that it’s not dealt with here but need to be addressed is 1.) the current Japanese people were not the first settlers of Japan. They took over from the Ainu people. This needs to be unpacked. And 2.) the genetic link between the people of South American and the Australian Aboriginals. It seems like there was a migration from Australia to South America. Please look at this and include it in future work.
" They challenge the status quo"., however their 'challenges " are around 98% rubbish, devoid of evidence or scientific backup
Yep it's all based on selective books often poorly translated stories that were often stolen from other cultures.
@@piked261 I hope you don’t mean the Bible as it’s the only true and reliable source we have. Ever considered that the bible was always the one that had the stories and other cultures used parts of it for they’re own beliefs?
Aboriginals are connected to Egyptians
@ClementGreen meaning we have egyptian hieroglyphs in Australia, and two of the Aboriginal gods of dreamtime actually may be representation of the egyptian gods Osirus and Annubus. That kind of connection. Meaning the Aboriginal could have decended from Egypt. And this also may be a reason why Egypt had so much gold. There is also evidence and Canaanites in North America. Which this can show that within the very first few hundred years from the flood event and the tower of Babel humans very quickly spread all around the globe.
As a Maori from New Zealand Im finding this very interesting. Some of it I already knew from discussions over the years with my father.
This is so interesting. I’m American and my family’s oral history indicates that we were already in America and not a product of the transatlantic slave trade.
This guy is trippin Oz has been heavily populated for thousands of years.. 500 tribes spanning the whole country before colonisation. Oldest living culture on earth.
I lived in Lae, New Guinea for two years. When the tribes assembled for a “Sing-sing”, they were VERY different in looks. Especially the Buka or Booka tribe, whose skin was true black and they were taller than most other tribes. I learned that there are over 600 different dialects among these peoples. It is a true mystery to me how the tribes have maintained separate physical attributes and languages over tens of thousands of years. Perhaps this is important.
Recent article in a scientific journal points to Siberia for origin of Aborigines
If you look at the flat earth map, it might make more sense..
They simply would respect each others side of the island and would marry with their own tribe hence maintain peace and own identity
It's because they are ostracised if they have a relationship outside their "skin" clan.
They haven't, there is only 6140 give or take 30odd years in history since creation
Thank you for this research. I am a Maori from New Zealand and we have Y-dna tested our Father to try to find our historical lineage. This video is very helpful and amazing. Is there any further linguistic research or relations to the Maori peoples origins.
This should be called "Answers in Genetics"
Good one. Nathaniel is definitely pushing Creationism into new frontiers. Praying the Lord's protection and strength for him and Ken and everyone at AIG.
I don’t understand how people can’t see that aborigines are from India! They look exactly the same?
I think you have that the wrong way around lol
Why not the other way round?
No mate nothing alike
They came to Australasia via the coastal India… after they left Africa. We are talking about a journey - from Africa, via India etc - that took tens of thousands of years. It didn’t happen in a single trip over a couple of months, lol.
Looking at the migration of the Vikings also suggests that ancient celestial navigation played a key role in the movement and migration of peoples to new lands and territories. References to the sun and moon as gods and orientation of ancient buildings suggest a strong relationship to celestial navigation and seasonal planting/harvesting and behaviors related to the solar equinox.
Looks like we are all related in some way and don’t need to be divided by racism at all. What a wonderful world we could have if everyone accepted this. Thanks for your work.
Accept and let's move on a my cozzi lol 😂🤣 after all Noe s ark was discovered exactly where the Bible said the mounts of Ararat . Ron Wyatt discoveries . Armenia. Now Turkey .
The first commandment in the bible is each must go kind after kind. End of the story.
Nope, we aren't. Most anything on you tube is approved by liars, or we should say, all university material and public "knowledge" by this type of study is false for the fact that it is manipulated through the eyes of one group, and that group descend from Cain, who's father was a nephalim, and Esau, who married into the Cainites, that you know as Canaanites, who are nephalim.
If they can mate together, produce offspring together, and their offspring can produce offsoring, then they are the same kind.
It's the white race that teaches they people to hate people of colour and difference , they are only becoming educated through Social Media, and finding out that they are connected through the races.
They need to change ,because they are killing off their heritage, to make just a white race,they don't even see ,what us indigenous see, and that's interracial relationships are scattered throughout the globe, and have been for a centuries.
We are connecting to truly what we are,white people aren't the 35:15 superior race, they are just a race.
I love listening to Dr. Jeanson, he makes it all so real and simple to understand. I hope he does another series.
I read a research study about the connection of Polynesian people with the coastal Alaskan people. Their conclusion was that people crossed the Pacific to Alaska first then settled Polynesian. Their evidence was based on DNA, ocean currents, and language similarities. The easiest migration routes may not be ones actually used.
I have a screenshot of a site that shut down, it tells of ironstone slabs with Phoenician writing.
1 says "Ships sail from this land under the protection of Yahweh to Dan"
It's in a museum owned by Rex Gilroy in Tamworth.
Another says assemble here to worship Ra the sungod. It gives the name of the country used by Hebrews as Sinim, the Egyptians called it Punt and the Phoenicians called it Ophir.
Ophir is the eleventh son of Joktan who was born when the earth was divided.
Could this be when the ice that fell during the flood, along with the inland lakes bursting their banks and forming grand canyons which are on other continents apart from north America?
This water being withheld made walking to Australia / Sinim as Isaiah called it in chapter 49 & verse 12 possible.
Everyone knows about Andaman islanders, because one of them was a main character in The Sign of the Four.
Listen to Prem Rawat!
Thank you for this post which relates to my patrols of the Pacific in the mid-1960s. These patrols included the Marianas Islands, Bonin Islands, Japan, the Philippines, East and West Caroline Islands, IndoChina, New Britain part of New Guinea, the Soloman Islands, eastern Australia, Fiji, Samoa and much of Oceana. These locations were populated by the groups you featured in this post. Conversations with the islanders and members of the Peace Corps yielded fascinating insights.
Archaeologists used to think that people walked from Siberia through an ice-free passage down Alaska and Canada, reaching the interior of the United States about 13,000 years ago. In recent years, however, well documented earlier sites like Chile's Monte Verde have convinced most archaeologists that humans made it deep into the Americas by 14,500 years ago, meaning that they would have had to cross Canada long before an ice-free corridor existed.
The human foot prints found in White Sand, New Mexico date back to 25,000 years ago.
Thank you for your fantastic video, l have always found this topic soo interesting. As an ex Australian Navy sailor who have sailed the world and experienced soo many peoples and found how difficult people can look in the same country.
I have learnt very little considering the amount of questions asked by the presenter. That makes this film 40 % speculative , 40 % questions and 20 % fact. It could all be summed up in 10 minutes. Very little new facts since 10 years .
the title 'Australia's Mysterious History FINALLY Revealed' promises a lot but presenter goes around and around in circles.
No different than any other of his claims. But he’s got it all figured out though. Speaks a lot but doesn’t state a lot
See my comment above
If you believe this guy, you already wanted to believe him. No sceptical person would ever be fooled. He uses pieces of truth wrapped in fiction.
It would be very helpful if A in G would put the video number in the heading. I would like to start at #1 🙂
Thank you both, men of GOD. I remember picking up my first Jared Diamond book and being so dissatisfied and here you have done such amazing work. As you mentioned, this is ground breaking and the movement pattern is almost that of escaping war. The legacy people's seem to have in thier culture very determined territorial and 'peace' observing rituals. Maybe this is a carry down of tradition from this era
Men if God equals stupid ducking idiots
I would tend to give more credence to the work of Jared diamond over one of those from God centric approach to history.
Yeah, what is your problem with Jared Diamond?
Indonesian has many ethics groups, but most of them, except the Papua and Maluku, has 80-90% similar face features, for example the Javanese, Sundanese, Melayu, Maduranese, Balinese.
But sometimes, i think because mixing with other ethnic such as Chinese, Arab, India, which maybe start happen in 300-500 years ago and still happen right now, you could find they has similarity with those ethnic group.
For example, you sometimes can find Maduranese who has white skin and face features almost like Chinese, or the face resemble India or Arab.
Also for Sundanese and Javanese sometimes you can find they have light skin; maybe from Arab or Chinese, also sometimes even they have brown skin, their face, especially the eyes like the South Chinese ethnics.
Also to be noted, majority of Javanese and Sundanese, I find have similar face with Thai people.
And some of Sundanese similar to Philippines people.
Also, the Dayak people also have similarity with South Chinese people, and Vietnamese people
Interesting but problematic - Went to an Auckland Museum presentation about 10 years ago that explained origin of Pacific Island and NZ cultures was not via land bridges but via Wakas (canoes) using memorised star charts for navigation. Basically, Thor Heyerdahl's theory of South American origin via balsa boats was genome incorrect. Their evidence was the common North Asian genome (above Vietnam). It is a common problem for land dwellers to not think like maritime people, in that the sea is a highway, not a barrier.
The Pacific island's human genome has high correlations and interestingly also matches the genome of the Madagascar peoples via wakas. They also determined a match via the genomes of their domestic chickens and the maritime rats. Also archeologists found similarities in pottery. Dating is recent at 3000 years ago.
It is also incorrect genome-wise that Tasmanian aborigines were earlier/different to mainland Australian Aboriginies, this explained via a somewhat racist and incorrect approach to lead us to think that the current Australian First Nations people displaced an earlier people, therefore it is OK for white settlers to displace them. Please I need some citations here. The other issue is migration path for a non-maritime people, we are lold vi a land bridge across the Torres Straight when ocean levels were lower.
Please also, is it disingenuous to look at a face and make race judgments? Saying "They look like..." is insufficient and the genome must be the evidence. In your genetic testing, are there any Australian First Nations genomes leaving a genetic trace through Indonesian and PNG?
@@ayianaarthur2551 I think your comment is unfair and does not take into account the notion of Terra Nullius. They did fight - I used to work near a suburb named Pemulwuy, named after a noted warrior who fought to defend traditional lands.
Spears and Woomerahs were not effective against mounted rifles. Organised massacres took place, along with practices such as stolen children and abuse and servitude of children, forced assimilation, forced deletion of culture and language, forced removal and relocation from traditional lands. Add in biological techniques such as blankets infected with smallpox and poisoning of natural drinking water sources.
I believe the histories of Canada, US, Africa and South America all have similar colonisation stories. (We recently read of graveyards of many first nations Canadian children near resettlement schools.)
Aboriginal people had tribal lands with well defined borders that included hunting and fishing rights. This was an organised society and tribal borders were well-defined in traditional artworks. ANMM has curators that can explain how this practice worked. Interesting that when Captain Cook careened the "Endeavour" at what became Cooktown, he was not attacked as this parcel of coastline was a lawful sanctuary where local tribes could safely meet and were not allowed to fight. A few miles each way, and Captain Cook might never have made it back to England.
The Auckland museum has political reasons for hiding pre Maori artifacts - I'd take what they say with a grain of salt
The Aborigines were in Australia first, but they migrated there from elsewhere. They didn’t grow out of the ground. They migrated, just like everybody who came after them.
@Jim Rolfe Yes they may not have been "nations" as we perceive them today, and I am not sure why you have to focus on 'stone age' - Back 60K+ years ago, we were all stone age back then, and all people's origins stem from East African rift people via a migration path. The colonisation of Australia that took place from 1788 was either 4K tears or 60K years after Australian Aboriginal migration (depending on your view). Then also, the Europeans came from the same East African rift people, but with a much more complex genetic background and a lot of intermingling.
@jimrolfe2894 if you apply the same logic to say, Scotland. Well Scotland was made up of hundreds of nations.. Now you see how stupid that sounds. It doesn’t help anyone to perpetuate a lie.
I had to forget some childhood memories just to make room for this information.
@14:45 in reference to the similarities between languages that seem to have a base language. It's like growing up playing a board game with "house rules"... all the kids grow up and put their "spin" on the rules to standout slightly, but the rest of the family can still play along....
to me aboriginals were still in garden of Eden metaphorically, they basically gardened their landscape or the land so that it supported them not like planting flowers but like manipulating your environment so it produces what u need its not quite farming and its not what we think of gardening but i think its the best word, I think that, this sought of existence is what the bible is referring to when it mentions eden.
hunters & gatherers, only taking what is needed. we don't own the land, we belong to the land.
our aboriginal ancestors were hunters & gatherers- only taking what they needed to survive (food, shelter, medicinal, ceremonial) giving thanks & replenishment
@@bon5436 not entirely true they did manipulate the nature around them they created small ponds off rivers for fishing, probably harvested and planted some yams and also used fire to create small pastures in areas for better hunting of roos and to replenish the landscape and probably and alot of other things that are lost.
@@jasonmckay8793 how you gonna tell me it's not true . I only said a couple of things and NOT ALL !! i know this. But I am Australian aborigine my grandparents lived the old ways and passed down information so DON'T TELL ME ITS NOT TRUE!!!!
@@bon5436 i said not entirely true not the whole truth if u like.
Great work! I love that there are people diving deep for answers to our families history.
Some very good docos on early NZ races have been made and in terms of languages there are traces of Celtic, Middle Chinese and Ancient Sanskrit influences. The legends suggest that some very early colonists were from the Aboriginal peoples, but those of Celtic descent were also present early on, and later on were those from somewhere around India who lived in South America before being driven out in wars.
The original people in Zebulun, New Zealand, were white, and the later arrivals, the Maori today, hunted, raped (mescegenated with them) and cannibalised them. That was about 3,500 years ago. That is where the traces of white culture are, and always seem to be attributed to Maori, who do that Haka, which is the war dance from when they declare that they will literally consume the enemy. They were loathsome, and are still the same.
My ancestors came to the Americas thru mountains of ice and ice caves.
I think in the long run, there are three language bodies in the Americas. Yet, there are also words common from Siberian natives to the Tierra del Fuego. Shon is one, with variation like shah, both mean to change as in a shapeshifter, usually a witch.
So if he's proposing that the Olmecs may have been descendants of the dark skinned family group that made up Africa and South-Asian Islands, wouldn't it make more sense that Africans came over via the Atlantic route instead of the Pacific route, since it is easier to travel by boat across the Atlantic than the Pacific? Plus, more discoveries in Africa are pointing to much more developed civilizations than previously thought.
I don't believe only one group of ancient Africans went only one route there many Evidence that many tribes exist throughout other part of the land that travel to these lands from Africa in different era of times .. Thank for that point of view👍
Isn't that what "The Ra Expeditions" was about? (I'd completely forgotten about that until reading your message.) The Pacific is calmer than the Atlantic, so perhaps a Pacific route is more practical.
This is awesome! I've been trying to do this exat thing, using various data to map out the history of mankind (using languages, technology, archeology, etc). But ancient history is so hard to study with all the bias towards evolution models. It's really nice to get information from a researcher who considers what the Bible says. Thank you! ♥
Keep up your work. No telling what you could add.
I've looked through things, but when researchers might give the same, or scattered tribe different names, hide information etc, it gets very hard. It's very fortunate that the while Maori middle eastern heritage, and white people in New Zealand when they came, was off the crush radar, and I could find a number of areas/names which Maori could be derived from. If it was a popular thing to be swept under the carpet at that stage, I might not have found much.
He is not thorough enough. We need to start back in time as well, and move forwards. There is genomenomad or something, with videos that do a bit of that. But they are too fast with too little text, but I got an idea my suspicions are correct. If you go to Wikipedia, they center y haplotype F on India/Indus region, with a lot of the haplotype genetic diversity spreading from there. I suspected that it likely could be a range of positions, that the original people need not be the original location. I was suspicious it might be an Indian identity thing. Sure, enough, there is one with a nice radial pattern spread out, and others with locations nearer the caucuses as I suspected. Looking at the ancient DNA spread in those nomad videos, we see that they shove F on a long link then the immediately sub types of F, mainly concentrated near each other in the Caucuses, or near it. Which indicates to me, a likely hood that they started there, and F did, and F could have split off in a other direction, maintaining a separate identity. It's worth looking into.
Amazing work of the of DNA research and Thanks you . I always believe that all people on the earth came from the generations of Noah, as it is written in the Scripture. Genesis 10: 19 ; " Theses are three sons of Noah :and of them was the whole earth over spread. "
Robert Sepehr covers all this. RUclips- Atlanitain Gardens
You should check out the series called skeletons in the closet. It's a 3 part series on the history of N.Z. and Polynesia. Some Hawaiians believe their ancestors came from Alaska. In New Zealand some native tribes say they came from Persia and India. Supposedly NZ was occupied when discovered by Maori also
I think there was an earlier Polynesian wave of settlement I think the Maoris met these people as they arrived the mori ori they called them. Or there is the other hypothesis of fair people coming from perhaps north Antarctica southern south America across the isles at an earlier point perhaps after the flood 9000bc ish it seems less likely. As for coming from India or Persia its totally possible I think we underestimate how much people move and how dynamic our past is.
i do not believe for a split second any pre european contact maori had the slightest clue persia or india exist. maori come from taiwan originally i thought? they obviously came from somewhere in asia.
@@johnwatts8346 thats what the genetics say but people move whosto say were the taiwanese polynesian ancestors came from
@@jasonmckay8793 maybe maori are all related to old Genghis?
@@johnwatts8346 well they are definitely related.
It seems clear to me that humans have never been a species splitting into very many races or subspecies in a divergent evolution. On the contrary, it seems that very many different subspecies or races have been mixing, not only during the last 5 to 10 thousand years or 50 to 100 centuries, but for the last three thousand of centuries since there have been found archeological evidences that show that modern humans lived 3,000 centuries or 300,000 year ago.
Human subspecies, or races, have always been interbreeding and still are, when opportunity makes it possible. The path has always been convergent, and never divergent!
See my comments above
WAR; One aspect of this dispersion didn't seem to be covered here is the aspect of warring neighbors. Throughout history we have evidence of mans desire for control and mans inhumanity to man.
It's my opinion one driving force in the spread of civilization would have been tribal conflict. More established and stronger tribes gaining possession of desirable lands and the weaker being forced to move out and away for preservation's sake.
In Australia (as in America) we have been told the Aborigines were one unified nation, where in reality there were over 250 tribes many in constant strife with each other. We find many tribes in the interior surviving in grossly inhospitable country. I don't believe they chose these areas by choice when other tribes a hundred or so miles away were dining on mud crab, lobster and barramundi. The need would be to spread out for greener pasture.
Agree, the weapons tell some history aswell ,specifically shields are used for one thing,defence from another weapon.
Well wasn't it fortunate that we white " christian "folk came along , killed many of them, deprived them of their lands and culture and 'civilised them " so now many of them live in the most inhospitable lands, with no work , terrible facilities and health , we've exiled them in the places we don't want as they are deemed worthless and we have the coastal strips and more liveable areas.
I'll tell you something Bud !! My ancestors were given large land grants in Australia. They were true Christians and regarded all Races equal therefore to take the life of and aborigine to them would be murder. It's the blessed catholic church that promoted evolution for it's own benefits. Your lovely Darwin stated that Kalahari bushmen and Australian Aborigines were closer to monkeys than human. They took their lands and killed because that gave an excused to take their land. The Stolen Generation was stolen by the catholic church to convert them and increase their numbers NOT THE TRUE CHRISTIANS ... OK!
@@shillout7270 my dude
@@shillout7270 Darwin was Unitarian, Catholic Church was originally hostile now, doesn't have a position.That's google consensus pages of it. Enjoy your large land tracts and keep up the distraction technique🙄
Amazing research !!! Well done to all involved.!!
Very good research for the world understanding of life.
@ 44:14 I was shocked some years back to see the peoples of eastern Siberia when dressed in their traditional garments and riding their traditional mode of transportation and speaking in their native tongue looked and sounded EXACTLY like these people, so I was convinced that our Native Americans migrated from there, I mean these eastern Siberians could enter the U.S. today and be mistaken for modern American Indians even dressed in modern clothing.
Oh yes super true. Everyone thinks native americans are related to Mexicans until you see us next to some siberians, it's like hold up 🤔
Aboriginal people were here since day one. No one else accept the Aboriginals the original inhabitants of the Australian continent.
Hi in the Altia region, going into the Mongolian and China region, is the oldest blond haired fair skinned graves found. There has been found graves relatives between the area and the Caucuses. They were at a time in western China, and weee moved on after a war with the Chinese, then being invaded by Asiatic tribes. I am unsure what the eras were, but maybe this fits in, as you your graph shows movement above this area into America.
Yes the Altai and the Denisova Cave. Similar story in the amazon many skin colours and a blonde race the Cloud people or Chachapoya of South America.
The burials are the Pazyryk Burials.
@@wadej347 Yes, they recently found a undisturbed tomb several hundred feet or meters under the mountain, giving a clear genetic signature of a most "beautiful people" if it is the regular population.
@@wadej347 They are talking about a long time before that. I think it was tens of thousands of years on the conventional time line. It's very hard to tell with the manipulation of time lines.
We traveled through Iceland across the land bridge between Asia and Alaska through the Americas, from the land Of The bear to the land of the emu. And we inhabited all these lands for thousands of years, we then inhabited Antarctica and moved to Australia and we never once encountered a white man, so if white man didn't come from a black man where did they come from. The history of the world can be told in Australia. Atlantis is in the Pacific.
I can’t find Part 15 on RUclips. Was it taken down?
No. It's there. It's called "The Ancient Native American Connection to Modern Europe". Just missing "Part 15" in the title.
Question 🙋♂️ how was he looking for India when India was called Hindustan at the time
We Italians call the regional variations in our language Dialects, I speak straight Italian and I’ve gotten the hang of siciliano and Napolitano. Every region have a dialect of their own and some of them are totally different than Italian by any standard. Most of what you’re speaking on is the reason for that mostly Rome after all brought every ethnic to Rome and I guess I’m happy of that because that primordial milkshake LOL is what created todays Italian ethnicity to some degree god gave use our beautiful ethnicities…. Nathaniel might like this observation, being older lol first generation Italian in America the years that I grew up(the big migration of immigrants) I was able to experience and I observed that the Italian language in America has even mutated this is due to the Italians as all ethnicities all typically stayed together in areas of the country but that put many people that spoke mostly dialect so they all got smashed together and all kinds of new words were created just because of dialect and! I find a large reason is just ignorance and miss pronunciation…
I'm English and we have dialects,
My wife is filipina and I am Australian had dna done and she has exactly the same dna native marker as I do. I assume that some of the Australian Aboriginals come from the Negrito Filipino's.
I absolutely loved this. Mother is Filipino Japanese, Father Irish, born in PNG ✌🏽
Thank you 🙏🏼
The latest group of hominides found to be the oldest to live according to the beginning of group thinking and social organization were on the north of Africa around 300 000 years ago (Marocco) Prof Hubelin (French) worked with a German university and Moroccan research centers, was dated with the latest thermo-luminescence system. Then groups were found to have seeped out of Africa towards all directions, then turning around, meeting other groups, mixing and then separating again. In Africa the first hominides that resembled Sapien started running around 2 million years ago, maybe the first groups left Africa, then were followed by new groups of hominides for the next 1.9 million years, running along coast lines and through areas where hunting and gathering, ice level, sea level .... which never stopped evolving. I live in Geneva Switzerland, which 28 000 years ago was covered by 900 meters of ice. Ice covered so much of Europe until 10 000 BC that the tribes of the "north" were bound to stay under the level of Paris not to be under ice. During that period, the sea level was 150 meters lower than current times. Most coastal life dating 5000-10000 BC is now underwater.
What an incredibly interesting video this has been! My great great grandfather wrote three of the languages of South Australian Aboriginal peoples. His name was Clamor Schurmann, Google him up and you will find out that this is true! I love your Ark , Ken and I wished that we had one here in Australia. By the way in Victoria, Australia there is a place called Ararat, I was always disappointed when I saw no Ark there when I was a child! Haha! How nieave was I. I love listening into all of your facts about this world based on Biblical Facts. Keep up the Good Work that all of you do! GOD Bless you all! 🙏 Your sister in Christ, Julie
Ark is the stupidest thing going
How many of the Aboriginal tribes had/have writing and how many don't? Did he help create the writing or did the Aboriginal people already have writing? I am interested in good Bible Translation groups and have been trying to keep up with the good and bad translation groups. Even then I still love the stories about some of the different groups of people and their writing as compared to ours.
One of the US astronauts spotted a something on Mt Ararat from orbit resembling a ship.
Archeologists went there and have found a ship in the ice.
Due to wars in the area further investigation is difficult.
@@billyhancock7851 None of them had writing
@@MaxB6851 I'm aware of that. What has that to do with this video?
One thing to note about the language families:
Is it right to think that Hebrew belongs to Afro-Asiatic language family & Indo-European is a different language family? For example, Greek alphabets alpha, beta, gamma, delta are clearly derived from Phoenician/Hebrew Semitic language: Aleph, Beit, Gimmel, Dalet... So, not only the alphabets, there must be many other similarities between so-called 'Indo-European' and Semitic languages. When I was learning Hebrew about 3-4 years ago (abandoned the attempt for now), I realized similarities between the Hebrew language and English (even in the similarities between how A B C D.. are written vs early Phoenician versions).
Not only that, I found that some words were similar in Hebrew & Korean (I was living with Korean friends) - for example, the word for father in Hebrew is abba & in Korean it is abeoji (same root - ab), and the word for water in Hebrew is Mayim & in Korean it is Mul. There were other similarities, such as in Hebrew a word for God is Ha Shem, which means The Name, and is sometimes used synonymously with Heaven - Ha Shamayim. In Korean, the word for God is Haneunim (which means God and is equivalent to Haneul, "Heaven" + nim, "Lord").
Not only that, my Korean and other Indian friends were surprised at the striking similarities between Dravidian (a branch of Southern Indian languages) and Korean language - even when there is no physical resemblance between these two people groups.
And interestingly, I saw an English movie where the protagonists traveled to a village in South America, and the native South American woman referred to death in her native language as "Moth" - which is the same word for death in Hindi (India). There are no recent or known connections between South American native peoples and India, and yet this word was common. Also, the word for death in Hebrew is "Mûwth", and in Sanskrit it is "Mrtyu" or "Maran". Modern Hindi uses "Moth". Anyways, all curiously start with M.
The more I have had exposure to different disconnected languages, the more I had occasions to find similarities among them.
The main point is the predicament of languages being attributed to certain families, when there have been striking & often deeper similarities between un-connected language families. This is a point (much deeper than the problem of races) I had long been wanting to point out - and this platform gave me an opportunity.
Notice what I have written about striking similarities between Dravidian (Southern Indian) languages & Korean language (3rd paragraph in my first comment) - when the peoples are from different races & their languages come from un-connected language families. So, this is not about race, but about something more profound, which Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson here probably did not take into account - probably because in his research he took the so-called language families as one of the starting points in his further research without questioning & getting to the details of the categorization of language families themselves.
Also, if you place Greek alphabets/Phoenician alphabets/Arabic alphabets together, you would find that none of the three languages have their alphabets that as so similar (one-to-one) that they could be called 'copied'. So, the analogy with Australian aboriginal languages being written down in Latin letters is also flawed.
Yet, there is a greater similarity between Phoenician alphabets and Greek alphabets than between Greek & Arabic alphabets.
However, even if the Phoenician alphabets were merely copied to the Greek alphabets, then there must be other similarities as well. Cultural or literary assimilation (any part) does not happen in isolation. If there were other similarities, then what is the point of putting them into different language families?
It is possible that some of the giants may have survived the great flood especially in the new world
@andrewstubbersfield7057 Noah.... you moron. hahaha. You realise the bible is not fact? There was no such thing as the Ark. Seriously.
It is very interesting that these groups occupy areas within a certain longitudinal plane. What navigation by the stars could have played a part in migration by sea between these land masses?
I have noticed that the people of Southern India resemble the A. Aboriginal people.
My thoughts EXACTLY!
@mr jones Australian Aboriginal
Go to 'SKELETONS IN THE CUPBOARD - THE UNTOLD HISTORY OF NEW ZEALAND', There is a Maori tribe with white skin, green eyes and red hair. Their Genetic is mainly Ancient Persian. Maui was said to fish NZ out of the sea in mythology. He is said to be an Egyptian. Interestingly Mauritania is linked to Atlantas and King Atlas / Atlas mountains, and are called the Mauri. Also, the Maori vowel sounds are the same as Italian. Maori were able to pick up Italian easily during World War 2. There are some Maori tribes who don't want to scratch too hard below the surface.
The Annunaki were in Aotearoa first. One encountered by Hatu-patu. The accounts of Ishtar show a similar personality in the birdwoman story. Esau had Hazzel eyes not green Redhair. Esau was Hebrew. Toi eyes haircolor same.
How does this theory account for the differences in technology? Australian Aboriginal people do not use arrows, never mind metal tools, both of which they would presumably bring with them as they go into unknown lands?
Probably seeds and animals as well for food and medicine.
The Aborigines have their technology, like the boomerang. Don't forget that much of Africa was not advanced in metalworking. The Maori peoples had the lowest types of tech.
@jimrolfe2894 you don't need iron to boil water.
@Jim Rolfe so they didn't have boiled water but knew about aerodynamics for thousands of years how do you explain that little titbit where Europeans didn't discover it until the 1800s each to their own in the evolution of our respective species the australian people evolved in their own way they didn't need war tools as much as the rest of the world do and they were concerned with recycling way before most other races hence why their tools were made of natural materials and valued nature more than wealth or ownership
@Jim Rolfe putting words in people's mouths i said we evolved differently in our own way no need to get butthurt snowflake and as for going back to an earlier existence do you want to regress backwards or move forwards how do you explain boomerangs then i guess they just waited for Europeans to bring those with them all bow down to the superior race now explain how aboriginal pictographs are right across thew world predating your man made book
@@davidnetherway4734 Im not an expert but where has this come from?
They didnt understand aerodynamics, they knew how to throw spears and make boomerangs. Making a paper aeroplane does not mean you understand aerodynamics.
They didnt recycle, making a tool from a rock and some wood is not recycling.
They fought regularly, constantly against each other. They have found evidence of tribal genocide.
Id like to know where or how you learnt this?
Thank you for all the good work.
The southern Africa to south America route across the south Atlantic is more likely. Its a shorter route and faster and even easier if its Ice age sea levels because currents will take you from west Africa to Brazil/ Uruguay. My hypothesis is that the first people out of babel that traveled fastest were those with boats on the river. They followed the coasts after leaving the river which if sea level was lower would have reached to the strait of Hormuz. They may have loitered in Hormuz area until ice age and sea level changes pushed them to keep moving with family groups separating with some boats going south and others east. The boats were good coasters not rafts or canoes but still small 4 -6 meters. They had simple sails and paddles. Both the southern and eastern fleets had a mix of languages and perhaps less that 50 people in 12 boats. The may have had animals trussed up or in small basket cages, mini arks. The southern group skirted Arabia and Africa dropping numbers of as people settled. One or two was swept to the Americas on reaching the south Atlantic shores. The Eastern group went coast hopping to south east Asia dropping off people in India, Indonesia, and There another split happened. Indonesia is a ice age barrier. What's islands today is all land with the Mekong flowing down the middle between Borneo and Java. The river mouth may have been a current barrier. Those successfully crossing colonized the Philippines, northern Papua New Guinea and some made it to Japan. Those caught by the current are swept to Australia landing on the shores of Sahul; the joined Australia and New guinea. I am assuming that these fleets would have sailed for no more that 3 to 5 years so their populations would have established themselves in far flung places within 5 years of Babel's fall. We probably need to chat Nathaniel. Check Facebook.
That's crazy talk if your theory holds water then please explain how Australian aborigines have existed more than 50 thousand years longer than the existence of Babel let alone it's fall. It disgusting to attached ancient people's to a made up story written by uneducated goat herders in the middle East when they have existed so much longer than. the very oldest part of Jerusalem was settled 4200 bce yet aborigines culture was unchanged since 45000 bce so the ancient ancestors of those who wrote your book where still brand new comparatively
@@Jameswoodgo The dating labs have an inherent bias built into the design of the processes that has been challenged in experiments and proven wrong. If you send them stone that is known to be recent but lie, say its probably old, you get the result matching the lie not the truth. This has been done with rocks from many recent volcanic eruptions. Mount saint Helens most famously. Everything is cross calibrated to long age assumptions. I believe the aboriginals got to Australia within a few years of the Babel event and that was early or just before the ice age. Watch one of the other videos it deals with the dating lab problem.
@@hatac before the last I've age so over 100 thousand years? You sir have no idea what your talking about
There were People who had come from Australia living in Brazil and Chile 40000 years Ago including footprints in Volcanic Ash Dated with Potassium Argon Method on a Mayan Dome Volcano
People have migrated in both directions at various times accross the Baring Strait most recently the Blakfoot crossed 6000 years ago with the Type A Blood Factor of Noongar, Yzidi and Soumi Finns
In that Brazilian Museum that was burnt down there was a Skull that dated 12000 years old
20000 years ago and older in the depth of the Ice Age the Ocean Levels were 123m lower as there was a Polar Ice Cap Glacier over the North American Great Lakes - Canada & Alaska would have been a very difficult place to live
TIME STAMPS & PERSONAL NOTES
0:00 Intro & Review
7:45 Start Of Main Content
😂
"misleading title" you hav,nt even started to make a FINAL REVEAL on australia. eg 2 very different tribes in sth australia shared a common border one being ngaiwang (Polynesian) & the other negrito on the eastern bank of the Murray river with two distinctly different burial sites & both exceeding 50.000 yrs
Wow, that is very interesting! Do you have a source or ref you can share?
@@Quackzine search NGAIAWANG on wiki. that will get you started I lived on country for 20yrs my contributions are at adelaide uni. as a footnote if your interested search captain Sturt & Edward eyre they were instrumental in the subjugation of the tribal capital MURUNDA aka murundi a permanent settlement with stone buildings & extensive farming practices upstream is their burial grounds ROONKA-ROONKA on Murray stay in touch if I can. be of any further assistance JOHN
If there are so many different language families in Papua New Guinea (PNG), then why could there not also be many different language families in western South America? Perhaps the reason for the many language families of PNG could help uncover the history of western South America.
Great engaging documentary 👏 👍. Thank you for putting this out there, my thoughts were already along these lines, but you've perfected the theory and made it so clear and concise! Very much appreciated 🙏 👍
Very interesting, thank you and makes far more sense than anything else I have heard.
It’s all bollocks
@@RealHooksy It is far better than the completely made up and ridiculous, failed theories of the big bang and the evolution of matter, evolution of the stars, evolution of solar systems, evolution of planets, evolution of life from non living mater, then, evolution from a singled cell organism for non living matter, to a human being and the 50 million plus of genetically diverse and individuals, of which there are some 50 million species on this planet! Now THAT is bollocks! This is the uni (one) verse (line or phrase) that brought all things into existence, which explains time, space and matter, all in one verse.
(Genesis 1:1) "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
I believe native Australian people didnt come from Africa. I just don't see a connection and I know people disagree. Btw I have a lot of respect for certain proclivities of the true Australian Aboriginal people.🇭🇲🌿🙏
I think the resourcefulness of our species proves our ability to travel by sea. Ships or raft canoe designs are clearly evident. So like Vikings migrations occur if unimpeded. This timing is possibly climatic.
Ah Genesis chapter 11; makes mention of the changing The One Language in to Many.
Why is it people ignore the timeline in Bible History all these events took place after of course The Great Flood.
Where missing some thing crucial from these Bible stories that is okay there was a vastly different World Before the Great Flood at one point our World was identified by another name besides Sheol/Earth, today Geology and for some insane reason Paleontology agree upon this narrative, that Earth was once 1 Super Continent today it is referred too as Pangaea kind of why the Continent's look so much like broken Jigsaw Puzzle pieces.
2:) in Genesis & 7 says that The Flood Gates of Heaven were opened and the Fountains of The Earth sprang up, think of a common Human error a leaving the Kitchen sink on an it runs and runs till it overflows and spreads across the Kitchen straight into The Dinning Room; if water isn't mopped up soon it's going into your carpet if not taken care a musty moldy smell then develops.
My point after the Flood the one big continent became 7 so yes there were other people here they were Pre-Flood dwellers.
After, The Tower was left incomplete due to God changing 1 language into many the plan for us to scatter and really populate the Earth is possibly since I'm not God what The Creator wanted for Us.
As I've said each Person's considered indigenous are where their Ancestors migrated too after Tower of Babel.
Evidence that other people once lived there is because They lived before The Great Flood.
Did you know recently PBS did a long series in to The History of Indigenous People's/Native America are as most would prefer to be Identified as Sovereign Nation's that they mention cities that were built by the gods even named after those gods.
I admit this part I'm about to divulge would be A Theory at best but, honestly its all I have for now till God shows me something else and He Has been.
In each Ancient Civilization has anyone wondered about these precious word's?
In The Beginning, different stories are introduced by diverse Civilizations that once thrived though they be dust an no more those Stories thrive and continue to fascinate us much of those stories are used to teach philosophical principle such as The Story of Icarus.
So here's the Theory up until Adam and Eve to The Tower of Babel Earth's inhabitants spoke Hebrew.
Of course With Tower of Babel God introduces many languages thus ethnicity is Born.
Now after The Great Flood Noah and his Family would have told the next Generations the Oral stories of the World that existed before The Flood and it would have been related in Hebrew.
Then Babel Happens and the stories once said in Hebrew becomes changed as well The Name's of The People before The Flood in Hebrew becomes another name the now spoken many language's.
What they did and how they lived before the Flood is changed to because a word are phrase didn't exist in that New language itself.
The point is The Ancient Relatives were teaching Oral Stories of The World Pass they were still the same stories but, the question would be getting back to cities built by the gods, our Bible Tells us there are No other gods but for The Holy Trinity, question who got cast out of Heaven because they started A War there.
All the ancient structures are built as though something was attempting to re-create A World they'd been Banished from once more God Created Us from The Earth in his image 1st Adam then Eve.
Adam was led to Eden He wasn't created There. The Animal's were sent to Eden so Adam would take care of Them; but, they weren't Created in Eden.
Who then built the cities of the gods? That's places where very old structures stand today which the World marvels at when visiting the structures.
When immigrants migrate elsewhere do they not bring a part of who they are with them and replicate the Homeland of Their Ancestors as example....
Chinatown, Japantown, Germantown, Little Italy (why Frank Sinatras Mother could speak 40 different languages from Italy).
Does one not see the culture in those specific Town's in question?
After, banishing Adam and Eve and expelling all the animal's out from Eden why would God have 318 Angel's block the entry into Eden to keep people out but, who else Did God not want in That Eden of Earth and who had access too Eden in Heaven?
An was kicked out of Heaven for The War; He Started of his own Free Will?
I forgot on a side note something that confirms a hunch and it's only a hunch till God says otherwise to me.
A while back I watched a 30? or 40 minute video on the Akkidan's here on ytube regrettably haven't seen it since, The Sumerians pertaining to the earliest pieces surrounding The Epic Poem Gilgamesh.
The person was sharing their perspective on the topic with regards too how it was written, and sharing that at some point there is confusion with the writing itself.
This pertaining to The Second Oldest Epic Poem on Earth, Gilgamesh.
The writing in the person's opinion seemed to be going in one direction all the while tipping in another way; but, in the story, it seem's as though The Scribe's are quote writing gibberish an none of the initial writing made sense.
There was an curious amount, abundance of annoyance; in the person's voice discussing Gilgamesh.
Thankfully the annoyance in their voice perked up my ear's, The Writing of The Akkadian's? The Sumerian's?
In The Time of Our Ancestor's Writers were in fact referred to as "Scribe's".
A Scribe's Calling in that Era, was to record the History of The World; which was often dated usually by The World Before and After The Great Flood.
The summation of the Akkadian's Scribe's within Sumeria, the short video, I listened too here on ytube, emphasized discrepancies within Gilgamesh's Story.
Here's my point I believe The Scribes who was writing about Gilgamesh is direct evidence, for the moment, God Himself; changed Earth's 1 Language, into Many Language's, many Tongue's.
Based on how the person introduced Akkadian's format of writing; The person said it was confusing, those word's themselves; appear to be going off into many different directions that made no sense to Them.
An too me this evidence is when God changed The Universal Language.
Picture it as The Tower of Babel is being Constructed; Scribes are busy recording this grand moment and other moment's of History that is to be a crowning achievement with the completion of the Tower, soon to become dubbed "Babel", when there's a shift.
The sudden use of something alien something never heard before until now, the language's are thereby changed, and so is the Dream completion of The Great Tower now Babel is over.
I just wanted too share that since, I had brought up The Great Flood, 1 Language changed to Many Language's with the Construction of The Tower of Babel.
In my last post I forgot too add this Bit.
I saw a Smithsonian documentary around 5 years ago that came to kind of this conclusion that aboriginal Australians 1st settled Americas but put the time line at 20k yrs ago.
Those DNA testing advertised on TV good for people that were adopted.
That’s how I found my Dad and his side of the family. I didn’t have his name or wasn’t told anything about him. I was able to trace the family through my 23&Me matches.
Why? Your family is who adopted you.
@@SpicyTexan64 that is true 😊
It's a resource available. That doesn't make it good. The intention and the results determine objectively if it's good or not
@@SpicyTexan64 health concerns, nothing to do with who is your emotional family. Every woman in my family had a hysterectomy or died of a female cancer. My father died of colon cancer, just like his father before him and his father before him! Colon cancer does not skip generations is what my doctor told me.
It is important to have a family medical history, that is why!
awesome video , can you a summary of your finding in a simple form with your opinions please
unbelievable
history based on the bible is an insult to my intelligence
Can I recommend you label this series with which episode # they are. We have to just hunt and hope. For example, no episode 16 or what ever for this one. Will aid viewers follow the intended sequence
Some of just got some weird genetic throwbacks i think. I'm half Filipino and Scottish descent and people have assumed I'm from places as far as Hawaii and all over the pacific even to Japan and Korea with a half Korean girl actually asking me if I was part Korean and people from New Zealand asking me if I'm from New Zealand. Maybe it's the Spanish connection and that's where the crazy mixing started happening when they were in the Philippines 🤷 but you know there's something strange when people from places you're not actually from think you're from there.
My mother has even questioned where I got my looks and says I don't look like anyone in the immediate family and says I look like the "old people" of the islands.
She also told me she has a light skinned cousin who married a light skinned Filipino and had a negrito baby. Those genetic throwbacks again.
I've often wondered if I'd be able to travel the entirety of the pacific and have people think I'm just some weird local hybrid lol
My father also had children with an Australian Aboriginal woman so it seems I'm related to half the world 😆
Ray Comfort says Australia is a small island off the coast of New Zealand.
"Rumours of people in Australia before Aborigines" from a guy in pub.
Sounds about fair. If I like what I hear it MUST be true.
All of this I call the Cinderella's Sisters Effect (CSE). You've got a shoe and by God you are going to make your foot fit it.
Exactly
He creates little urban myths to say "hey I'm not the only Australian who believes this"
A "pre" native Australians would still be considered a native Australian anyway right lol
I was always told I do not have relatives near me. Turns out that is not true. There are a bunch of my relatives around, but they all hate my side of the family.
HOW OLD is aboriginal culture
60,000 years
There are varying estimates for how long Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have lived in Australia, however, upwards of 60,000 years is what current research reveals.
A two-metre-long painting of a kangaroo in Western Australia's Kimberley region has been identified as Australia's oldest intact rock painting. Using the radiocarbon dating of mud wasp nests, a University of Melbourne collaboration has put the painting at 17,500 and 17,100 years old.
As for the Aboriginal people , they have been screwed up by missionaries , many of whom helped authorities to steal their kids , stopped them from speaking their languages and brainwashed them into thinking that biblical religions were superior to their own beliefs. Most indigenous people have had their culture destroyed by Christians ,due to their religious zeal and bizarre intent on 'saving ' them, due to their incredible conceit in their thinking that they are 'superior". For most of them , being "saved" involved dying from communicable diseases ,deprived of their lands and herded into enclaves supervised by christian jailers.
Australian aboriginals from what I have gathered have never been united as a group. There were many tribes that were constantly at war with one another. It is very possible they would have wiped each other out.
@@anthonythistle1465 A false narrative you have been indoctrinated with. Whilst not a united people, conflict between tribes was very rare amongst the various tribes.
@@bottplug2272 Indeed. The weapons they carried with them in the old days were for hunting purposes only, the fact that the Native Police were of different tribes from the ones they were used against was purely a coincidence, and the animosity between different aboriginal groups even today is all the whitefella's fault ...
@@maddyg3208 Ok then, if it's all the whitefellas fault, then please return to a traditional way of life. Properly traditional. Stone age. No?
When you say "show up right here", blind folks are left out of knowing where "right here" is; so also with folks, such as myself with 20/800 farsightedness sitting 10 feet across the room from the screen. Even had I my nose to the screen, I would require at least fifteen, maybe thirty or forty, seconds to "digest" that, which you said, before you go on to the next thought.
Listen to Prem Rawat!
incorrect information here
They are full of crap!
There were people on New Zealand before the Maori arrived. Maori legend tells of them, there were different kinds of people, from some who were very small Hobbit type of people to others. The Maori killed them all off
Austronesians originated in China - Riverine and maritime East Asian mainland, with the Yue people who were from mainland East Asia (modern China) tattooed and master mariners… but from the mainland NOT just Taiwan. These Yue or Yueh people were displaced by other people and spread throughout the Pacific. That is why one can find people with the classic Pacific Islander, Melanesian-Polynesian square head and generous lips… people who look like Māoris from New Zealand, but live in Hunan in central South China, and in Hainan Island in South China.
The aborigines are from the India Bangladesh area that’s why you get people in them areas that look like Australian aborigines there was no sea in between India and Australia at one point and the aborigines and Maori said there were whites on New Zealand and Australia before they got there
So you could say they came from Australia? No one knows
Dr. Jeanson - where genetics and geography and linguistics meet
This guy is speaking more in relation to what he studied but not at all on any actual reseach he has done. People keep in contact with your elders. He's doing what they have done throughout generations. He's feeding you his--Anglo-story of your existence.
Geology and sea levels could explain which islands were connected to main lands and to various islands
Popular consensus is the Aboriginals travelled across a land bridge via India ➡️ SE Asia ➡️ PNG ➡️ Australia, upto 60,000 years ago.
Melanesia is part of this tree.
Polynesia comes from the islands of the greater area of the China Sea.
The islands of Melanesia were already occupied by cannibals/headhunters from the earlier migrations hence the Polynesians moving further out into the Pacific Ocean to set up camp..
There solved!
There was also a migration from Madagascar to the Andamans and perhaps Australia (still debatable).
This is crazy. It's just a lot of speculation. Australian aborigines have been there 50,000 years.
And you know that how? Not because you were there, but because other people with their own opinions they got mostly from others, told you that they were there. Fundamentally, we don't really know, but this guy is trying to figure it out. If you strongly disagree with his findings, start studying and get in there and figure it out for yourself. I'd be very interested in what you come up with. But, be sure you go into the research with an open mind and no preconceived notions, which is tough to do.
@sammcrae8892 I know because others have studied it. This nonsense about having to be there applies to everything, particularly to books like the bible.
I don't beleive in either Creation or Evolution theories, but find this research absolutely amazing.
Then what do you believe in?
I enjoy your work but it would be good if the repetition in every video be dropped and just answer the issue.
I live in Australia and my background is Greek , some of the Greeks I know look like polynesians.
I also know some Greeks that you could mistake for aboriginals.
Please tell your recherche team to search for the term ,vibes of cosmos on RUclips for the true maps from the moon map. This will help you and will make things make more sense. Love and light to you
Yes, I’d like to see his stuff on a moon perspective map. Much better collective look. I guess a moon map might not help his case.
@8:13 India was called Hindustan on every map at the time of Columbus. A mis-translation of Columbus writing in Portugese when his 1st language was Italian ...Columbus referred to to people of America as En con dios which means "In with God" but mispelled the phrase in dios which the word indios means Indians translated to English.This is what the late great Russell Means a Lakota Sioux activist,award winning actor who became a tribal elder and Chief of The Sioux Nation before he passed
Dutch got here before Cook. So why was that erased from our history yet the Dutch still receive royalties from the government.
It’s not been erased.
It’s the well documented and easily found modern history of the continent we now call Australia.
@@RealHooksy erased from the narrative.
@@Vegasflatout yours maybe
Indonesians not only settled in Madagascar but also on the coast of Eats African from about 300-1000 and likley took black slaves back to madagascar
You can find many articles discussing found DNA links between South America and the Australian Aborigines. I dug and found something about the Mixe people in highlands Oaxaca, Mexico and a DNA link found to Australia. This is pretty much Olmec territory.
Very interesting information
Think back to before the continents separated, we are taught no one lived back then, but it is possible that a society lived on the one huge land mass that existed at this time. I believe humanity has existed far longer than we have been taught.
You can't teach what you don't know. The cradle of civilisation was in Syria but was destroyed due to the muslim fanatics. There are far older civilisations being discovered but you can only educate as you discover.
I believe humans existed when there was two supercontinents and those two continents broke apart much more recently than we are taught. Approx 1million years ago. Aboriginal ppl seeded the southern continents whilst a section with them on it broke off W.A. and sent colliding into the Eurasian landmass I.e. India
@@bottplug2272 Look at Australia mate. Its the oldest plate on the planet. Life started here. Humans started in Africa but everything else originated from Australia. A million years tracks nothing. There are plants so old their evolutionary pattern can only conclude a planet billions of years old. Then there's the soil and few connections Australia holds with the few other continents like Africa with the Boab trees. Genetics also backs up the migratory pattern of humans which is then backed by pottery and evidence of camps.
It's not out of Africa...it's out of Australia
He keeps referring to episodes by number. But they are not listed by number in the website
My suggestion is Africans that ended up in the Philippines, Andaman Islands, Australia and New Guinea were the first migration. Note how they have survived to be found in remote places. I suggest the second migration of Asians conquered and destroyed those Africans that remained on their trade routes and their paths of expansion. Those "Chinese"" were probably technically more advanced, defeating and dominating in most places, thus African DNA diluted. I suggest Papua and Australia were missed due to remoteness or lack of good reason to venture that way. I'd suggest that missing genetic clues to prove this were mostly eaten, rather than bred with as conquered subjects. Horrible to to bring up historic cannibal practices, but war and such has always been a good motivator to emigrate and discover new lands and riches to plunder. Such would explain holes in the genetic path today, knowing there was a route of emigration, but that route mostly lacks evidence. It appears that what remained of the Africans had no interest in going to sea, whereas those from Asia had interest to expand for on the seas.
This is so fascinating.
I don't get what this has to do with the bible, of course humans spread throughout the globe in ancient times, what's your point? Why are religious people this deceitful when trying to justify their book that was written by people who were ignorant of modern day science and discoveries?