THIS Caused the Downfall of the Vikings | Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 май 2020
- Visit Answers.tv: All Answers in Genesis videos, live streaming, and much more-all in one place.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give
Fearsome, violent, and romanticized, to this day the Vikings of the Middle Ages command our attention. Even children’s movies have taken up the Viking banner. What do we know about their history? The legacy of their exploits? After the Vikings plundered northern Europe, what happened to them? A thousand years after the peak of their power, do any of their descendants roam Europe? The Americas? Could you be related to them? Tune in to find out!
I don't think history is even taught in schools these days.
Just antiwhite history.
If not for my dad’s specialty in history, I’d be historically illiterate. Heck, I might still be, and it’s most of what I’ve studied for twenty years... Didn’t get much from school. Only one good history teacher there.
Actual hiistory isn't. Globalist, revisionist, and anti-Christian history is taught. There is so much to know in history before you can even explain some of the more basic events in recent history.
Doubt you'd find out about the Maoist/Stalinist history of democide or the killing fields. That's history they don't want you to know.
if they don't let us know we will repeat it and thats what they want!!
Nope, that’s wokism
I think Christianity was the ultimate conqueror of pagan Viking customs. True Christianity is always the ultimate conqueror of pagan cultures, because the mercy, light, and gentleness conquers the normal human desire to have a lifestyle of violent self- will and worship of mere human beings and false gods. Jesus said He would build His church, and the gates of hell would not prevail against it. He has, and continues to conquer hopelessness. One day He will throw even Death and Hell into the bottomless pit forever.
In what world history course did you get the idea that Christian Expansion over pagan cultures was even slightly “merciful, light, or great”? Cultures that had already accepted Christianity over pagan pantheons during the Viking age specifically were just as brutal and violent. Everyone during the dark ages was. Read a book. Christianity beat out because it was a mostly unified religion and not a mixed tapestry of clan beliefs. Many pagan societies accepted God into their beliefs and into their already existing pantheon. After that it was inevitable that the Church would squash the Polytheism from the cultural norm.
You have literally no way to say that my gods are false. You have no evidence Jesus said any of this, or that he even existed. Yet for this, you destroy other cultures.
Thank you, brothers, for unveiling the overlooked truths of our history
Wow!
You all have answered every historical puzzle in the world. How Guinness!
We have been traced back to the Vikings in our lineage. My aunt worked in a research lab, and we volunteered our blood for it. We are mainly western European descent, but they found a rare Chinese antigen in our blood. So this explains a lot.
These videos go by too fast. Fascinating , thank you
I was able to trace my family trees are Norwegian back to the 1500s. All were farmers on other people's land. Most of family have dark blonde or light brown hair. Lots of blue eyes. Great grandparents left Norway late 1800s for America and landed in North Dakota.
I am Angli from southern Jutland , one of 3 viking groups that occupied Denmark.
Have you discovered your Y-Haplogroup ?
@@theelizabethan1 No. All I have is a family tree going back 378 years in Haderslev , south Jutland.
Interesting, in light of the past 2 years (today is 6/5/22), I am wondering if there has been a genetic immunity to our recent "pandemic"
Immune to fear and corrupt big pharmaceutical giants running WHO
Yes, I believe some people like myself for example are genetically immune to the recent Covid virus that has infected so many in the last 2 years and 4 months time.
I don't know about an historic immunity, but I've been repeatedly exposed, and heavily, and not been sick for the last 6+ years at all. That sounds like immunity to me.
I'm 6'6" English as far back as we know. one of my Grandparents was from Durham, last name Teasdale from The River Teas on the east coast of Britain near the Scottish border. I'm The tallest in my family and I have an L6 vertebrae, I asked my Doctor if this would make me taller, he said about 2.5 inches more. Apparently 8% of the population have an L6, most people only have 5 Lumbar Vertebrae. L6 people are more prone to have lower back problems. I now wonder how much I'm Viking?
I feel for you. I have 24/7 pain in my L5 to SI joint. I can't imagine an L6 to deal with!
A 23andMe ancestry analysis would assess your Scandinavian heritage.....It will also identify your Y- Haplogroup, which most other DNA tests do not include.
Wonder if the post-WW2 Dutch population had an increase in prevalence of that L6 vertebrae?? The Netherlands are acknowledged as having the tallest among contemporary Europeans.
Watched this on Answers TV.
tell how the saints CONVERTED the Vikings
... miracles AND ALL !!
Exactly. The Vikings got saved and settled down on farms throughout Norway, Sweden and Denmark. Churches dot the landscape in those countries today.
I suspect it is more like the king saw an opportunity to centralize authority since the Vikings were largely autonomous.
Great study, thanks.
This fascinating research should destroy all barriers dividing us and unite us as 1
i dont wanna be 1 with u, stalin
@@gruenergermane aint replacement just God's Natural selection..hopefully, no tears Adolf
I am half Icelandic. Related to the founder of Iceland.
Im sure all Icelandics are related to the founding father. All of Brittain are 5th cousins of each other
Funny, I have some red hairs and my hair is tinted red, my brothers all have red hair, and one of my sisters has red hair. My mom is strawberry blonde. And my grandfather on my mom's side is direct descendant of Swedish people, his mother and father still spoke Swedish.
You should put the next episode on the card at the end of the video.
Very interesting.
The Vikings were the travellers of the Norse. The Norse are alive to this day. Christianity conversion (Catholic) changed everything.
Thanks!
nice to get a clear flow of peoples
The Vikings left all their relatives back home in Scandinavia , so most ancestors and descendants are either still there or all over the world wherever people moved to . We have our geneaology in Sweden back to the 1500's on paper , handwritten in old parish bible pages in Sweden today . There's no confusion as to who we are or were .
I'm a Norwegian descent and one night while playing music at a restaurant bar, this man that was buying drinks for the house look like you could easily be a relative. I asked him are you Norwegian by any chance? He claimed I was born in Stockholm Sweden. I'm very good at facial recognition. So I can also spot an Irishman or a Jewish man a mile away.
The Vikings did go everywhere. They conquered England in 1066 after conquering Normandy, moved to Siciliu and conquered the holy land in the first crusade (not your typical knights, Vikings in knight armor sponsored by Urban II because they were still pillaging and taking concubines up and down the English strait). They’re also the first Russians, Rus comes from the red in their beards, and later founded Quebec and many settlements down the Mississippi, including New Orleans and Louisiana. As well as Iceland, Greenland. Just a fascinating history, their boats and mythology took them everywhere
He said at the outset “a few thousand years”
They're still around. In Sweden. In Norway. In Denmark.
@@firebirdstark
Nope -- the Vikings did not conquer England! King Alfred and his Anglo-Saxon forces prevented that ...The Danes did take control and settled into northeast England and established the Danelaw over those regions.
Northeastern Ireland, Northwestern Scotland, Normandy, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland....those are the places that my family are from.
One possible motivation for Goths and others from Scandinavia to migrate could be volcanic activity in Iceland causing severe conditions. Your video mentioning dispersal from the Papua area could be explained similarly, but throw in the potential for some colossal earthquakes (and tsunamis), and I think I'd be looking for a new home, too!
Now how do you think you might find out if and when that happened?
Look in the Bible or look in the geological record?
We have dates for those migrations, and there would be ample data for volcanism, were it the cause. We have massive amounts of data on Mt St Helens, Pinatubo, and Krakatoa, and the weather patterns effected by them. For Iceland to have emitted sufficient ash to effect mass migrations out of Scandinavia would have left massive deposits. But the volcanism of Iceland is not shield type (as the majority of the Pacific rim volcans are) and that amount of volcanic activity would have been easily identified.
The Vikings settled Iceland...they didn't migrate from Iceland because of volcanic activity. Where could you have gotten this idea?
Yeah, so I was just throwing out ideas, guys. Keep in mind science can't answer every question definitively; for instance, a volcanic source is generally agreed as being the cause of the Worst Year Ever, 536 A.D., but nobody has found any evidence of where it may have happened. Also, one group's tragedy (or reason for moving out) could be another's opportunity. And maybe I missed something, but I mentioned Goths, not Vikings; but see my previous thought. Try exploring ideas with people instead of automatically shutting them down, please. And even though we have tons of data from contemporary events, there are far too many variables to consider when trying to analyze limited evidence from past events to state absolutely what happened in the past. Without reliable first-hand witnesses, it can only be presented as, at best, widely-held theories.
@@wild13hawk this is an example of supposition in science. An hypothesis frequently put forward as fact based on concensus. You do a fair job of making a point of the suppositional nature of the hypothesis, far better than most.
The image of a 'Viking' used in this presentation is a Scotsman, if ever I saw one :D
Ireland and Scotland have red hair because of Viking invasions.
In my research, they migrated to Minnesota! 🤣
The Vikings did trade with the Muslem, one of the suspected prove was the Elfburge swords buried with some of them. A very expensive weapon (been widely copied even in 800AD) only carried by Vikings with clouts among their people. Those swords were made around 800AD with what is now known as crucible steel, a very pure metal. That technology was lost for 1000 years , to be rediscovered around 1800s.I believe humans evolved from apes/monkeys in central Africa, we share 95%+ of their DNAs My Chinese last name translate literally into Woods.(Forest) Therefore I suspect my distance ancestors went to North Africa then turned right and ended up in China and later on America with the land bridge (frozen) which once exist? Another group went north to Europe and some became Vikings. I regard those last named Woods as distance relatives.
If you research RH negative blood, you will find that RH negative blood types .... are called RH negative because there is NO RH factor which is RH because it is common in Rhesus monkeys. RH positive blood types all have the Rhesus factor common with RH monkeys.
RH negative blood is a rare blood type. There is more I could write about it, but I don't have time.
My surname is classed as Pre-7th century Old English/Germanic and translates to Wulfnoth meaning Wolf-Daring. It is very predominant in the East Anglia region of England which was settled by the East Angles during the Germanic migrations after the collapse of Roman rule in Britain in the 5 century AD. Following the battle of Eddington East Anglia fell under the jurisdiction of Danelaw, and the Vikings from 865- 954 AD.
Just a suggestion: Time stamps!?
I find the constant reference to episode numbers particularly annoying since there is nowhere a mention of numbers in the titles.
I also say that time and changing ways caused this. Include Puritans, Pilgrims, Aztec, Incase, Egypt and their worship of Pharaoh's, and so many other races and civilizations in this ending.
I think I'm a viking, since I never won a super bowl.
Im a North Salinas Viking. And someone in my graduating class did win a superbowl
My family story claims that we are descended from one Rollo of Norway father of William the conqueror. Mixed with French, Indian (not American) my father’s side is Scottish lowlander.
Dad came to Australia after ww1 in 1923
Idid geneology on my fathers side & my Moms side and found a descendent from Scottland.
and some from Germany.
Everyone is related to Rolo.
@@jamespmullin21753 me too. He "got around"
Hulk Hogan was probably a viking 🏋️⛵⚔️
Gohans mother Chichis a viking
While Noah is mentioned on the chart, is there any correlation to the comet that impacted the southern Indian ocean about 5000 BC?
Interesting content... thanks much for posting! Does Nathaniel's stated height of 5'-11" take into account his sagittal crest? 😁
My dad's side and mother side- were Anglo-Saxon,(Dads) and Anglo-Norman(Moms) but Scottish, irish, and French are on both sides. I've got redish brown hair, in my beard my cousin is full ginger, and my wife has red heads on her side!!
The most scientific channel on youtube
Red haired giants of western north American desert perhaps...
Unbelievable, only a monotheist could be filled with this much hubris! The Vikings, while not a people but a profession, refer to the thugs that emerged between 536ad and 793ad. These people can be traced to two cultures the Romans call the Goths/Geats and the Suiones/Svear. My family comes from what is today called Uppsala was then Östra Aros. I am descended from Svear, and my family passed down the traditions of what we call today Asatru, my grandfather called it Odinic Orthadox.
… we’ve been able able to trace our family back to The Munsö dynasty!
You didn't discuss Sweden and Norway specifically.
Wouldn't it be interesting to see an overlay of the popular ideologies, deities (and their characteristics/ritual worship practices), human principalities/leaders ang their most notable actions, and plagues, upon the suggested migration and genetic I'd charts? I wonder how much moral decisions literally effect our genetics and DNA. Accepting falsehood in the garden and ingesting it literally caused error in our DNA. Was that a one time event or a paradigm?
Also when did a claim get made that caused the “downfall of the Vikings”
When God change the people's language to different ones during the tower of Babel I have often wondered if God also changed their physical genetic makeup into different types of people so we have the physical characteristics of Asians, Africans, Europeans, and so on.
It pains me to say this the third time.I GREATLY admire Dr. Jeanson and his work, which is possibly the greatest “smoking gun” of history confirming scripture. NO ONE has stepped forward to dispute his work, which needs reach the masses. We need to find a different means of delivering this discovery. The work must be summarized in discrete, easy to understand 5 or 10 minute clips. Dr. Jeanson’s mind seems to want to recount the minutia of his study as he speaks, which for me is very confusing. I get lost in the details.
I guess there’s no way to prevent my comment from being perceived as a criticism. I just want the general public as well as Bible-believers to grasp the HUGE ramifications of Dr. Jeanson’s work-
Yes. I had a very hard time finding what his point was.
@@joea4936 I know what you mean. My comments are sincere. His research is possibly the biggest proof of a young earth, and hence, Biblical authority, in my lifetime. This is not getting out. Someone who has read the book and understands its implications needs to summarize it in short clips that we all can understand. if they’re waiting for today’s crop of scientists to agree with these findings… They’re going to be waiting a long time-
This happens with especially brilliant people sometimes. There is a brilliant physicist who was contributing articles to Institute for Creation Research magazine Acts and Facts, and his articles were so technically incredible that most readers asked for some kind of simple summary. Dr. Vernon Cupps is his name. His ability with physics is so flowing, it seems like he is just breathing.
He finally began, towards the very end, to speculate that he thinks that people in Europe with Viking ancestry, who were alive at the time of the Black Death, ( bubonic plague,) were more susceptible to dying from the plague, than people in Europe at that same time, who had central Asian ancestry... He said that Because the plague came from Central Asia, maybe people descended mainly from Central Asia
had a greater natural l resistance to the Black Death...., as opposed to Europeans with genetic heritage from areas OTHER than Central Asia. Which he is saying COULD explain why fewer Viking descendants made it past the black death period in Europe, to continue having kids into the next time periods.. and why more of the people who made it to North America from north and west parts of Europe, in the great immigration period of the 1800' s, passed on genes traceable to central Asia.... if one looks at the fathers' DNA chromisome for MANY generations, and not just a few generations. It's not surprising, when you stop to realize that , as he has stated elsewhere, ancestry tests generally show a few generations back, or that's the most that people know about their families. The Central Asian plateau is enormous, and it's been known for thousands of years as the crossroads of the world. Less extreme climate zones in much of it, etc, etc. I remember that we were taught in the 1960' s that the Fertile Crescent was the cradle of civilization, and that's what the Old Testament states as well. Mesopotamia, " the Land between the Rivers". Is connected very thoroughly to Central Asia. ( For example, I have German and English ancestry. It's all I ever thought back to, so here, I am learning that there is a good possibility that my MORE distant ancestry would reveal ties to the areas to the east and perhaps south of what we now call western and northern Europe. Sounds logical to me!! People have been moving all over planet earth for many centuries for all kinds of reasons! Imo, Dr. Jeanson is just telling us there are more foundational layers than most people realize. I think his work is yet another of today's great research projects by honest scientific people, many of whom happen to be Bible- believing Christians. ... showing that the Bible is worthy of our faith because it is indeed factual.
I concur with you. The imagery he uses is easy to understand for him because he designed it. One has to always think of the audience as they haven’t a clue what you are talking about. I got lost and confused which is a shame as he has a lot of great things to share.
My dad’s Y chromosome is I-P109. My maternal grandfather’s Y chromosome is R-L20. Seems I’ve got both Viking and Mongolian ancestors. Both sides came to the America’s in the early to mid 1600’s.
It wasn’t even taught 20 in school years ago where I’m from in Michigan. I doubt if many of my high school teachers knew any history themselves to teach to us.
Where did the celts come from? And Stonehenge builders which according to archeology was built 1000 before the pyramids
If your ancestors survived the black death which is indigenous to the Gobi desert ( stretches across huge portions of both Mongolia and China) and the American Southwest desert, then you have likely inherited genes that give you an edge to fight it.
Europens had probably been exposed on many occasions to the black death in their history. The graves of people of ethnic European features have been discovered in Mongolia and China. These people were extremely well preserved in the permafrost and were tall well built people who had various shades of light coloured hair and apparently wore something like kilts with tartan patterns. One particular grave contained a magnificently clothed blonde woman who was very well preserved, maybe she was a queen or a warrior..
Straight up related to vikings. Bernard the Dane
I love the way half of europe's population, the slavs, are completely ignored, left out of the picture 🤦
how do you do this dna test you talk about
I am from English, Scotch-Irish, and German ancestry (I am American), so I might have some Viking in me.
The argument that the Vikings were selectively eliminated by the Black Plague doesn't entirely convince me, because they live in a cold climate, more remote from the busy cities of Europe where people live close to each other.
What down fall?
80 percent of UK heritage can be linked back to Denmark and Norway.
Greenland is still Denmark territory.
Even the Cherokee Indians tell story's about vikings.
7:20 begin
At the University of Adelaide Prof. A.A. Abby of anatomy was obsessed with the bodily measurement of native Australians as "'evolutionary evidence" that they were "Protocaucasian." Not easy to observe in DNA.
I have Norman dna and found out that they were the" Northmen" or vikings.
Just thought I'd watch this to see what they would attempt. As a person with a degree in history, all I can say is this is a clear demonstration of what happens when one allows a person completely ignorant of basic European history attempt to explain "the Downfall of the Vikings" (spoiler alert - they never get to a "downfall" of any kind). Just a few major bloopers:
1. The slide put up at 2:25 is pure bunk..."nationalities" in Europe remain in place often for thousands of years. Genetic trees are not nationalities.
2. The picture at 3:45 is not a "viking" ("viking" is a verb, by the way, not a noun - no one at the time called themselves a "viking." They were Danes, Norse, Swedes, Geats, etc who "went viking" for part of the year). Just lazy use of google for pictures.
3. Pic at 7:30 is even worse - cosplay apparently. It's like we're not even trying here.
4. The Scandinavians who raided across Europe, and eventually settled in parts of it, never "ruled Europe" and were never an "empire," that's simple nonsense. The Danes invaded England, were eventually defeated by the Saxons and incorporated into the Saxon kingdom. A later invasion led to a brief period of a united Danish/English kingdom, which split again. The Saxons again ruled in England until the Norman Conquest - the Normans were descendants of a different Scandinavian group, by 1066 they were French-speaking, Catholic, Norman-French. What we now call France (West Frankia at the time) was ruled by descendants of Charlemagne until a nobleman named Hugh Capet was elected in 987 and began the Capetian dynasty. What we now call Germany (East Frankia at the time) was also ruled by descendants of Charlemagne until Henry the Fowler, the Duke of Saxony, was elected king in 919, beginning what would be known as the Ottonian dynasty.
5. Kievan Rus was conquered by the Mongols in 1241. Most of the people there were of Slavic ancestry, the Swedish "Rus" were never more than a ruling veneer that quickly mixed in with the rest of the population (Scandinavians had a tendency to do that, like most conquerers and settlers do). The link from them to the realm of the Muscovite Tsars that began expanding into central Asia three centuries later is indeed a tenuous reed to grasp.
6. The Crusades were not a "movement of peoples." It was a military invasion, very few settlers and for that matter always way too few soldiers.
7. At 15:00 "I'm not convinced that the Goths, Vandals etc are of central Asian origin." Of course they're not. All of these peoples, from the Goths in the south to the Norse in Norway, were branches of Germanic people...same root language, same religion, same basic culture. This is a mystery to no one except AiG. All of these groups started as much smaller "tribes," that collected into larger and larger groups mainly under Roman pressure. The Saxons, for example, are the descendants of the smaller north Germanic tribes (the Chatti, Marsi, Cherusci, etc) who fought of the Romans in the years 9-14.
The "vikings" began raiding in Europe largely because of opportunity - the Saxon kingdoms were disunited and fighting among themselves, the Frankish empire in what is now France and Germany was coming apart and torn by a series of civil wars, the Magyars and Arabs were raising hell from the east and south at the same time. Once the Frankish, German, and Saxon kingdoms got their acts together, the "vikings" were subdued, the Scandinavian kingdoms accepted Christianity and joined the rest of European society. Thus the "viking" peoples did not "disappear," we don't have to go on a genetic fishing expedition to find them - they're still there, they just stopped using longships and bearded axes. I mean, this is elementary stuff.
Now, I'm not enough of an expert to deal with the genetics he's proposing, but given what he's done with basic history, I'm pretty confident he's making a hash of that too...which one would expect when one tries to shoehorn real genetics and genuine history into an "everything starts with Noah" mythological model.
Everything did start with Noah, but I agree with everything else you've said. The Vikings accepted Christianity and settled down as farmers etc. Churches dot the land in Norway, Sweden and Denmark. The Vikings are still there, just no longer conquering lands in longboats and axes.
@@cherylmay595 I would say Noah is a proposition without evidence - but it certainly doesn't have much to do with the history of the "vikings."
How about Croatia and Bosnia with the highest percentages of the I haplogroup? This link with Scandinavia is rather fascinating given their distance apart in Europe. Any explanation on this?
I was adopted from Poland and my paternal haplogroup is I1a.
@@macinhorstemeyer1961 That would place you further north than the R1A’s in North Eastern Europe. Interesting. Viking origin?
Normandy in France should have a high concentration of Viking as their Leader Rolo in York England was given a present of it to assist the King of France in his conflicts
So this has nothing to do with YEC? In what way as an atheist was I challenged? It’s just a video going over basic genealogy principals.
I am Scandinavian according to my DNA. Guess that makes me a Viking descendant?
13:00-14:02 yep. That’s me. E.Europe ‘before 1200’ with a small amount of ‘nordic’ ancestry. 16:08
According to Mum I’m “a throwback to the Huns & Mongols”
Research in Ukraine shows that Vikings in Rus were more of eastern Germany than Scandinavia
Since you talk about such rampant movement of peoples around the globe how in the world can you talk about genetic markers of any one kind of ethnicity; where do you start?
They got sails in 800 this era
Vikings studies show they are a mixture of everything
But we all come from Babel don't we? Surely we would all have the same genetic inheritance?
This can be deceiving? I think the DNA might be more deceiving at times. Depending on how it's read. A man buying drinks for the house one day it looked like it could definitely be a relative of mine. I'm Norwegian descendant and I asked him if he was Norwegian and he said he was born in Stockholm Sweden.
People in Scandinavian countries don't look like Asians although that might be a mixed blood kind of thing. Anthropologist Robert Sepehr claims that the Scandinavians came from the Lost tribes of israel. Moving Northward when the Assyrians invaded
I dont see episodes by number on their channel so why mention episodes? I dont even see similar sounding titles!!
Genesis has their own internet channel, $3month for their channel where you will find the episodes listed by number. On the utube episodes you will have to listen for episode titles to know which is first.
@@iamspartacus7756 I dont buy RUclips access. They have too many commercials for me to justify that. And if you wsnt no ads, you have to pay separately for that too. No thanks.
Hmmm I thought Vikings were a career not a race.
You're wrong, all Vikings were Scandinavian
@@jamespmullin21753 but were all scandinavians Vikings?
Haplogroup I, is not Indoeuropean = So what is their original Homeland
They still rule the world,in western Europe,Russia,USA, Australia, etc
Dna doesn't say they were blonde and tall
Mutations
Are not for all
love your jokes
So my 10% Viking heritage has resulted in a 5ft 5 inch male....🤣🤣🤣
There still many people still
R1
And see its a RUclips community called B.C.U. and they have documents and spoken knowledge from elders that say the first natives were black and already here , and the indians came later , and it was much fighting between all of them with some sticking together the Chickasaw supposedly being of black dessent , its so much being said, like the first Europeans being black, who knows 🤔😳 , its like after a certain point a specific group started making there on history to be remembered and cutting everything else out , and you better believe if any of it has even a ioda of truth to it they will never let it come out or be known 😳
Vikings got sails in 800 this era
So they were very late
That is anatolia
R
Yes is indoeuropean
Like the language
R1 is Celtic and germanic
It's an easy question to answer. What happened to the vikings? Christians murdered them, cut down their trees, burned their meadows, and made the practice of our native European religions illegal. Eventually they were just integrated into Christian dominated societies.
It was a culture war! And Don't deny the influence of the wives.
The creeps in London still discriminate against us Yorkshireman. When are we in an unrepresented England going to get an English Passport and an English Parliament in Manchester?
If Christians murdered them ...then they weren't Christians, because murder goes against the teachings of Jesus Christ. They could have been people who obeyed popes...that's a far different matter.
@markanthony3275 happy Yule (the real winter holiday)to you and yours! That's a cop out. We all know the Bible says not to murder. We all also know that Christians commit murder everyday and that wherever Christianity spread genocide followed.
@stephenlaing2152 kings were the only peoples not Christian? The peoples of Europe were forced to claim they were "Christian" to avoid having their heads chopped off and raised on pikes. They never stopped practicing their religion and they still do to this day. Stories of elves and flying reindeer have nothing to do with a Jewish child being born in the middle east.
How can I get my own DNA tested? And learn which category I am. Am I from the Viking heritage, or central Asian? Or other?
23andme, ancestorydna, familytreeDNA
@kprop Why?
A quick free way is to look at your foot shape. There's 5 recognized ancestral feet shapes. I did a video on it called ancestry in your foot shape. Quick 3 minute video.
@@woodybear8298 Your DNA info is then their property and they can share it with whomever they want including the government.
The Scandinavians made a study
For 7 years
Why oh why do people who want to talk about this time in history not do their research. The word Viking was invented by Hollywood. Their is no written record or any other record in history that refers to them by this name.
They were known as the northmen, hence the term Norse. And also when they moved to France for nine years they settled on the coast, in an area now known as Normandy.
so there's no replacement .. just natural selection
So ... covid isn't the first time...
The average height of a "Viking" was 5'9" we known this by archaeological finds. That height was taller than most people outside of Western Europe.
R1,ab have nothing to do with I or j
They were the first
The language
Not really
Wow! Really bad! The science here makes no sense...
You mean SAXON ? 😅...
Sorry, Doc Jaensen. I appreciate your work and think you are on the right track, but Haplogroup I is from Central Asia (Dagestan) and spread through Europe. This lineage was overtaken by R1b with the spread of Indo-European languages and peoples. Haplogroup I virtually disappeared from Europe except in Scandinavia. The R1a and R1b in Europe ARE the Indo-European peoples of Europe that spread to the Americas. There are Yamnaya (Indo-European) graves in the Pontic Steppe that already have R1b. The Huns, Magyars and Mongols pushed R1b West. According to ancient DNA studies, most R1a and R1b lineages would have expanded from the Caspian Sea along with the Indo-European languages. When you look at the Table of Nations in Gen 10, all those Japhethite nations are Indo-European peoples. An origin N of the Caucasus makes sense. There is such low frequency of R1b and R1a in Mongol and Turkic populations, it is more likely that the Mongols picked some up when they were in Eastern Europe than the other way around.
I am not so sure that you are right. First of all: Finns are not Scandinavian from a linguistic point of view. Thus it is questionable to use them for genetic evidence. British and French only have a limited trace of Scandinavian, since Germans (Saxons) also invaded England. Iceland can be assumed to reflect Norway to a certain point, but also British and Irish migration.
Also, I doubt if you are right about why "I" is less common than R1a (which goes back to 2.500 BC and stems from the Indo-European migration from the Uralic steppes and associated with Battle Axe culture). The simple reason why R1a is more common is that these were male invaders who married local women thus cutting down the share of local male men to perhaps 50%. Since Denmark has at least 3 migration groups into the country (forest hunters, farmers, herders or battle axe-people) that alone can explain why the I-chromosome group is less than half the population.
In short: not convincing. More proof is needed to convince me.
No not true still many many Natives in north and south America.
Mother's maiden name was Tingstead can't get much more Norwegian than that. DNA tests shows Iberian peninsula. Don't know what a Iberian is?
What about Atlantis?
Hi ! I wonder why you always pronounce the world viking as you do! VIK = means bay and is pronounced “veek. I have actually worked a couple of weeks at a small place in Norway, a bay, and the places name was VIK. There is a very old stave church there and the patients in the elderly home where I worked, had the same second name as you could see in the very old cemetery!
I also can’t understand how it’s believed that people managed do walk through dense forest and very much snow, from Asia to the Americas through Bering Sund, as it would have been so much easier to navigate on the sea streams, from Asia to the Americans! I like to take long walks in the forest but that’s quite impossible during the snow period! In the north of Scandinavia! (I know the Sami people manage in a way).