Flare of War - Tomahawk Missile

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 мар 2022
  • This video explains the strengths and construction of Tomahawk missiles.
    It consists of the missile guidance device Image-Infrared Seeker, Inertial Navigation System (INS), Terrain Contour Matching, Digital Scene Matching Area Correlation, engine, and more.
    I hope this video will help you understand the Tomahawk missile.
    #military #tomahawk #missiles #weapons #mscope
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 240

  • @fridaycaliforniaa236
    @fridaycaliforniaa236 Год назад +60

    Just to be clear : the TERCOM doesn't use the real heights or altitudes. It uses the height variations along the way to compare with a digital map stored in memory to "guess" if the missile follows the good path to its target.
    Other interesting fact : for ship-launched tomahawks, it was not uncommon that the missile first reached a pre-programmed GPS waypoint, then used its stored ground maps to fly to its target (ships move, you can't be sure the missile will always start right on a well known place or will fly on a portion of terrain already stored in its memory). So for Gulf War, the paths the missile followed where sometimes really surprising (often a straight line to the GPS waypoint, then the normal preprogrammed turns and trajectory to the target).

    • @19MAD95
      @19MAD95 Год назад +12

      So you’re saying the missile knows where it is because it knows where it isn’t?

    • @8bitfrenzy376
      @8bitfrenzy376 Год назад +8

      The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is - whichever is greater - it obtains a difference or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position that it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is is now the position that it wasn't, and if follows that the position that it was is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information that the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it know where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice versa. And by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    • @BlueRice
      @BlueRice 9 месяцев назад

      there's alot of thing he didnt covered, like a software similar to AI. they have it back then, it can scan objects like building, cars, tanks and what not to random target . if they set way point on routes it can fly endless loop until you command it only to attack tanks. when the missiles detect the tanks it will automatically target it. they have this tech over 25 years ago. impressive.

  • @krzysztof6123
    @krzysztof6123 2 года назад +12

    Great video reminiscent of MIlitary history in a minute

  • @jameshailerthepostmaster4389
    @jameshailerthepostmaster4389 Год назад +17

    I didn't realize The Bismarck can launch Tomahawk Missile.

  • @peacekeeper9687
    @peacekeeper9687 Год назад +7

    I like your videos, It is very interesting keep making such kind of videos 👍

  • @NonEuclideanTacoCannon
    @NonEuclideanTacoCannon Год назад +3

    I thought the unit cost sounded low so I checked it out, they're actually $2 million per missile.

  • @user-my3yf5em1f
    @user-my3yf5em1f Год назад +2

    This is a great racket, it's really strong, we need it 👍👍👍👍😯

  • @alfonsovelasco9627
    @alfonsovelasco9627 2 года назад +5

    You ARE an artist !!

  • @Tiagomottadmello
    @Tiagomottadmello Год назад

    Great, great vídeo !!! 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @muhacnt7988
    @muhacnt7988 2 года назад +13

    Looking forward to more contents

    • @Fr3ddyFazbear87
      @Fr3ddyFazbear87 2 года назад

      Contents lol

    • @muhacnt7988
      @muhacnt7988 2 года назад

      @@Fr3ddyFazbear87 nogga what

    • @Fr3ddyFazbear87
      @Fr3ddyFazbear87 2 года назад

      He always said everything with a S on the end

    • @muhacnt7988
      @muhacnt7988 2 года назад

      @@Fr3ddyFazbear87 Beacause he gonna be pumping out more of these beautiful videos

    • @Fr3ddyFazbear87
      @Fr3ddyFazbear87 2 года назад

      @@muhacnt7988 calm down

  • @luckytiger5551
    @luckytiger5551 Месяц назад

    Brilliant!

  • @silencerstudent9381
    @silencerstudent9381 Год назад

    Your videos are next level good

  • @JohnLedford
    @JohnLedford Год назад +4

    Great video! Do you do your own 3D work and animations?

  • @Cookboy3857
    @Cookboy3857 Год назад

    Nice amazing tamahowk

  • @michaelfleischer9795
    @michaelfleischer9795 2 года назад +1

    Top Super Animationen...👍

  • @BIG-DIPPER-56
    @BIG-DIPPER-56 2 года назад +4

    Very good - thank you ! !
    🙂😎👍

  • @GearTiger007
    @GearTiger007 Год назад +5

    very nice ! hope to see more tech about the more style of guide system

  • @CHFOP-ik1vs
    @CHFOP-ik1vs 2 года назад +36

    Why do these military channels always seem to dont know about the existence of „The“

    • @aaceytuno
      @aaceytuno 2 года назад +8

      Tarzan not know “the” , tomahawk friend, tomahawk blow up

    • @ninzapou
      @ninzapou Год назад

      To save time?
      Lol

    • @abinaslimbu3057
      @abinaslimbu3057 Год назад

      Criut body boot iron man
      Modern jet fighter
      Iron man mark 1

    • @emgee0312
      @emgee0312 Год назад +5

      TTS script made by non native english speaker probably

    • @SeanCMonahan
      @SeanCMonahan 7 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@emgee0312Yes, the creator of this channel is Korean. At first, I was put off by the computerized voice. There are so many BS channels around posting AI-generated or straight-up stolen "content," so I assumed this was the same kind of stuff. I'm glad I realized this channel is different!
      They are actually creating informative content. Their animations are excellent, and they seem to be open to constructive criticism when people have pointed out errors or incorrect details in the animations.

  • @bobparvin9773
    @bobparvin9773 2 года назад +12

    Thanks to Texas instruments and Raytheon,. We got the best they is.

    • @rokpertrovic940
      @rokpertrovic940 2 года назад

      So you can destroy the world? Most genocide nation in the world you killed 100

    • @rokpertrovic940
      @rokpertrovic940 2 года назад

      You killed 10000000 indians are you proud american??

  • @jasons44
    @jasons44 Год назад

    Dude I like your mind

  • @alessandrofirmani700
    @alessandrofirmani700 Год назад

    Woooow

  • @JG-dt2ub
    @JG-dt2ub Год назад +1

    Tactical sling shots are the future

  • @user-cb1tg1tr8w
    @user-cb1tg1tr8w 2 года назад

    Looking forward 😃

  • @johnzehrbach820
    @johnzehrbach820 2 года назад +52

    I do no know where the author got the some missed by 80 m deviation info, but to date the tomahawk is over 96% mission success meaning it hit the target close enough to destroy it. Better than any other guided missile of any type, although the TOW is close and now the Javelin.

    • @nestor1208
      @nestor1208 2 года назад +20

      The author said it was before the modifications for guidance were made. Thus after the modifications, the missile became much better, elevating the percentage of successful missions

    • @josephastier7421
      @josephastier7421 Год назад +2

      The Tomahawk has more in common with a fighter jet than either of those missiles.

  • @raymondyee2008
    @raymondyee2008 2 года назад +6

    Pc games like “688i Hunter Killer”, “Sub Command” and “Dangerous Waters” let’s you command the use of Tomahawk missiles.

  • @blameusa7082
    @blameusa7082 2 года назад +4

    when you know stuff, but cant say stuff 😎😎

  • @HeavensBladeTM
    @HeavensBladeTM Год назад

    Jesus I love this missile ! I fantasize about her !!

  • @ronaldwhite1730
    @ronaldwhite1730 2 года назад

    Thank you . ( 2022 / June / 11 )

  • @secularsunshine9036
    @secularsunshine9036 Год назад +1

    *Let the Sunshine in.*

  • @lkrxlee
    @lkrxlee Год назад +1

    Take a shot every time the narrator says 'Tomahawk' 🍻

  • @user-lm5rd2zo4v
    @user-lm5rd2zo4v 2 года назад

    2:20 ultimate NANI moment

  • @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723

    V1: Kid I'm proud of you!

  • @WalkaCrookedLine
    @WalkaCrookedLine Год назад +7

    DSMAC as used in the first Gulf War was a visible light system. Which leads to the question how could the onboard cameras "see" at night. As I heard it explained by a naval officer, the missile actually had a giant flashbulb to light the scene. In my imagination I have this picture of some sleepy Iraqi soldier spotting these flashes, maybe two or three in sequence, and a few seconds later, BOOM. Flare of war indeed.

    • @BlueRice
      @BlueRice 9 месяцев назад

      that i didnt know, wouldnt it be better having infrared light?

    • @WalkaCrookedLine
      @WalkaCrookedLine 9 месяцев назад

      @@BlueRice Apparently so, as I understand it later updates switched to an infrared based system.

  • @stalkinghawk9244
    @stalkinghawk9244 Год назад

    Does anyone know the soothing music used in the middle of the video?

  • @SolarWebsite
    @SolarWebsite Год назад +5

    The missile knows where it is because it knows where it isn't.

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 Год назад

      B.S. It knows where it is because it receives GPS.

    • @borisdorofeev5602
      @borisdorofeev5602 Год назад

      I knew someone would have commented this.

  • @NebulaTornado
    @NebulaTornado 2 года назад +11

    Tomahawk It's the best American weapon before drones, but what about Kalibre from Russia? Can we compare to it?

    • @BennyOrgi
      @BennyOrgi Год назад +6

      No. There are thousands and tenthousands of tomahawk systems available.
      If kalibre there are only a few dozen in store. Much likely no more anymore, because their production depends on western components, Russia won't be able to buy anymore.
      So jo, they are from a logistics and military point of view, not comparable.
      One is a real threat to nations. The other one is only a poor chance, to scare people who don't know about military industrial complexes.

  • @LithiumDeuteride-6
    @LithiumDeuteride-6 Год назад +1

    Russia also has its own tomahawks, it was created as an almost exact copy, only a little simpler and cheaper.

    • @MM22966
      @MM22966 Год назад +3

      Is that anything like Russia having its own stealth fighter and own 5th-gen tank?

  • @user-pr1sp1og6d
    @user-pr1sp1og6d 2 года назад +1

    Neden çeviri yapmıyor ?

  • @srdjanvujosevic88
    @srdjanvujosevic88 Год назад

    1:10, how many Tomahawks were used in Yugoslavian War?

  • @marlounyunson8740
    @marlounyunson8740 Год назад +1

    what powers the tomahawk? a very small jet engine? with a range 2500 km? what is the fuel?

  • @georgieippolito9924
    @georgieippolito9924 2 года назад +5

    anyone know where i can get the jet engine for the tomahawk? ( Williams International F107-WR-402 turbofan) the engine would be a perfect fit for my hang glider and has a whopping of 900 pounds of thrust! i could soar through the sky with that baby

    • @fridaycaliforniaa236
      @fridaycaliforniaa236 Год назад +4

      Meanwhile it's a "one use only" engine. Most of the time, it has no bearings, only cheap or weak mechanical parts (gears, etc), just a few control wires and electronic sensors (it's often designed to stay full throttle only), limited amounts of lubricant (or even sometimes no lubricant at all, just some kind of "permanent/long life" grease or polymer bearings). For example, on the French Exocet anti-ship missile, lubrication is done by the fuel itself ! The cooling system is often primitive too. Some cruise missile engines only start with an explosive cartridge, also. Your engine would only last 8~12 hours before being worn to a non return point or having it eating its internals XD.
      Just my assumptions, I was in the French Navy. Tiny engines for our cruise missiles were not meant to be "long life" items. They just had to be able to wait many years in a crate/casing before being intensively used once for a few hours run. (Sorry if my english is crap ^^)

    • @georgieippolito9924
      @georgieippolito9924 Год назад

      @@fridaycaliforniaa236 im still interested. i could replace the bearings with ceramic bearings and work on the lubrication parts if i have to. i would be a dream come true with a lightweight jet engine mounted on my hang glider especially my sports glider

    • @tianchi4423
      @tianchi4423 Год назад

      Get an RC jet engine. Those actually last.

    • @georgieippolito9924
      @georgieippolito9924 Год назад

      @@tianchi4423 ill check it out. don't think there strong enough though.

    • @wally7856
      @wally7856 Год назад

      @@georgieippolito9924 Search for "KINGTECH K450G4+" - 99lbs of thrust, should be more then enough for a hang glider.

  • @BrianWilliamDoty
    @BrianWilliamDoty 6 месяцев назад

    Man! The thing can hit you from 1500 miles away...

  • @dpatel2747
    @dpatel2747 2 года назад

    how blade drone work make video

  • @NN-rk4mn
    @NN-rk4mn 2 месяца назад

    8:30 I didn't sew you mention Bombing of Serbia in 1999. Over 350 tomahavk were lunched..

  • @Cameron_the_Robot
    @Cameron_the_Robot Год назад

    To fly stably. Always make sure to fly Stably.

  • @truegret7778
    @truegret7778 2 года назад

    I suspect the real solution used it starting at the target and working the solution back to where it it to be launched.

  • @GandaraVideos
    @GandaraVideos 10 месяцев назад

    Tomahawk missiles are also expensive to construct.

  • @knight5959
    @knight5959 Год назад +2

    can you tell what type of animation software you are using

  • @Slava_Yarmolenko
    @Slava_Yarmolenko Год назад +1

    A missile knows where it is...

  • @Pinkielover
    @Pinkielover 2 года назад +6

    One missile could feed me for the rest of my life and house me

    • @ddegn
      @ddegn 2 года назад +12

      There aren't many edible parts of a Tomahawk. I don't think you should try eating one.
      Tomahawks missiles would make a really cramped house even if you removed things from the inside.
      I don't think you'd have a good life living in a Tomahawk while also eating a Tomahawk.

    • @dad-ms8mz
      @dad-ms8mz 2 года назад

      He is talking about if he sells one🤣

    • @samu_cornia9991
      @samu_cornia9991 2 года назад

      @@dad-ms8mz yeah he's joking headass

  • @MacksCurley
    @MacksCurley 2 года назад +31

    It would take most people on the planet a life time to earn enough to buy a Tomahawk missile yet the Tomahawk missile exists to be destroyed and destroy life times.

    • @johnzehrbach820
      @johnzehrbach820 2 года назад +1

      About $2M now.

    • @nevajno2741
      @nevajno2741 2 года назад

      IT EXISTS NOT TO KILL PEOPLE, BUT TO DESTROY THE TERRORISTS AND ENEMIES OF THE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY (IF THERE'S OIL IN SOME FOREIGN COUNTRY OR IT DONT WANT TO RECOGNIZE USA DOMINATION, THEN ITS AN OPRESSIVE STATE SUPRESSING DEMOCRACY). TOMAHAWK IS LITERALLY BRINGING DEMOCRACY AND FREEDOM TO ANOTHER COUNTRIES - MORE TOMAHAWKS = MORE DEMOCRACY AND LESS COMMUNISM

    • @MacksCurley
      @MacksCurley 2 года назад +1

      @@nevajno2741 What rock are you living under?

    • @nevajno2741
      @nevajno2741 2 года назад +3

      @@MacksCurley UNDER MURICAN ROCK, BEST ROCK ON THE PLANET 💪
      MURICAAA, F... YEEEEEAHH 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅🦅🗽🗽🗽

    • @marcos0055101
      @marcos0055101 2 года назад

      Enemies*

  • @Von_DBL
    @Von_DBL Год назад

    Hypersonic missiles cannot communicate during the last phase of flight because of the comm blackout experienced by the plasma around the object. Just like space shuttles. This means that the missiles has to rely only on inertial guidance, making the accuracy very poor and potential success low considering the limited warhead enclosed.
    This technology is not mature and will not be for a long time.

  • @petergibbons607
    @petergibbons607 Год назад

    that water mark is super annoying, maybe you can make it larger and less transparent, and maybe put it on there like 10 times all over the screen that might help

  • @tommymairo8964
    @tommymairo8964 4 месяца назад

    So theoretically, it's a unmanned Kamikaze vehicle with more powerful dynamics 🤔 I wonder if the preprogrammed navigation path got leaked, whether the adversary could shot it down with patrolling fighter jets.

  • @jonswindells2728
    @jonswindells2728 2 года назад +3

    So what's the name of the missile again?????

  • @kjererrrt2381
    @kjererrrt2381 Год назад +1

    i remember how the russians downed them all with an electronic warfare system in syria when the yanks were trying to destroy an airfield. teh few missiles that did break through didn't hit anything substantial.

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 Год назад +1

      Propaganda lies.

  • @aandc2005
    @aandc2005 Год назад

    Why don't they make a stealth version of the tomahawk.. this one is subsonic and shows up on radar even at low altitude and could be shot down.. all they would really have to do is redesign the exterior so the radar waves are deflected away and not back to the operator..

  • @MM22966
    @MM22966 Год назад

    Crumpling your IADS with impunity since 1991....

  • @subram2011
    @subram2011 Год назад

    Didn’t know the past tense for strike is stroke…..

  • @garrysekelli6776
    @garrysekelli6776 Год назад +1

    Wasnt it a tomahawk that struck the pentagon on sept 11 2001?

    • @josephastier7421
      @josephastier7421 Год назад

      Yes, however it was full of chemtrail mixture, and altered everybody's perception so they *think* it was a hijacked passenger jet.

  • @iivin4233
    @iivin4233 Год назад

    I'm not sure I believe tomahawks are cheaper than planes. Much more tonnage of explosives was dropped by planes in the Gulf War than was delivered by tomahawks.
    That doesn't necessarily prove anything but one of the more expensive aspects of a weapon that flies is the part that flies.
    With a tomahawk you have to build a new, admittedly small, airframe for every payload you want to launch. A plane is reusable.

  • @snowdrop9810
    @snowdrop9810 Год назад

    6:06 holy shit missiles have an attitude?

    • @josephastier7421
      @josephastier7421 Год назад

      "Attitude" just means the direction that the aircraft is pointing. This is sometimes different from the direction the aircraft is moving, for instance a landing aircraft will have a nose-up attitude even though it is descending.

  • @gvsf5946
    @gvsf5946 6 месяцев назад

    How much silver is in a Tomahawk missile?

  • @mackjsm7105
    @mackjsm7105 Год назад

    The Missile DOES NOT have a IR seeker.

  • @nilalohitadey9246
    @nilalohitadey9246 Год назад

    But ballistic missile can hit target very very far like 10000 km that is why icbm are better than other tipe of missile

  • @arawan5anothai054
    @arawan5anothai054 2 года назад

    Ok

  • @ntnurdu4532
    @ntnurdu4532 Год назад +1

    Pakistan also have this missile and after upgrades it's become more dangerous than USA tomohok ... It's have longer range and can fire form surface,air and sea.. know as Pakistan,s Babur 1, Babur 2 and Babur 3

    • @someguy4915
      @someguy4915 Год назад

      'tomohok' Lmao you can't even properly spell it's name.

  • @nesseihtgnay9419
    @nesseihtgnay9419 Год назад

    The US also invented the cruise missile

  • @charlesmiles9115
    @charlesmiles9115 10 месяцев назад +1

    😛😛😛😛😛❤❤❤❤👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @h.n.t.d7963
    @h.n.t.d7963 2 года назад

    I think ill just call it long range suicide drone from now on lmao

  • @user-ju6pc1fl4y
    @user-ju6pc1fl4y Год назад +1

    Нам дуже потрібні такі ракети в бородьбі за свободу!

  • @EC-it2fx
    @EC-it2fx 2 года назад

    $0.57 million per Tomahawk missile

  • @pernykvist3442
    @pernykvist3442 Год назад

    They was shot down over Syria.
    So wonder if a next generation is
    under production, with EMP shield
    and stealth abillity?

  • @pradeepsahu4121
    @pradeepsahu4121 Год назад

    Tell about sophisticated Hydrogen bomb W88

  • @4lpina
    @4lpina Год назад

    2:29 It's American missile, why would it divide area into equal 100 meter sectors? Or is 100 meter just a coincidence?

    • @ablasttv
      @ablasttv Год назад

      Engineers use metric even in America.

  • @Klarpimier
    @Klarpimier Год назад

    But does Tomahawk Missile know where it is?

  • @stevejobs1653
    @stevejobs1653 2 года назад +1

    Why did he say the word Tomahawk so few times??

    • @simplyyellow6240
      @simplyyellow6240 2 года назад +2

      Cause he get paid everytime he said that.

    • @pauligel9117
      @pauligel9117 2 года назад +1

      @@simplyyellow6240 *why this missile is so рrasize, that it could hit Рutins asshole in Kremlin*

  • @mohamedm.el-sawymd2325
    @mohamedm.el-sawymd2325 2 года назад

    كل الصواريخ التي اطلقت استخدمت ضد بلاد عربية اسلامية ... لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله ...

  • @pilotmanpaul
    @pilotmanpaul 2 года назад +3

    Middle Easterners watching this: _So, about stopping one from hitting my city?_

  • @rchristie5401
    @rchristie5401 2 года назад

    only 20 years late

  • @christophercharles9645
    @christophercharles9645 Год назад

    Very good video but what's up with the narration? Very stiff and some weird grammar choices - like not using "the" half the time where applicable.

  • @kiloton1920
    @kiloton1920 Год назад

    450kg warhead? Ouch

  • @loadofstuff10
    @loadofstuff10 2 года назад

    Robot voice..

  • @TheMrGREENRay
    @TheMrGREENRay 2 года назад

    8:21 Yugoslavia in 1999 (nowaday Serbia territory)

  • @kevinderrick2787
    @kevinderrick2787 Год назад

    What language was this translated from??

  • @mure.13
    @mure.13 Год назад

    العراق ايكول انة شعلية

  • @Kopan-uy67iih
    @Kopan-uy67iih 2 года назад

    Так и не понял ничего.

  • @marleyboy7732
    @marleyboy7732 Год назад

    Tomahawk missles are expensive.
    Tomahawk missles are fast.
    Tomahawk missles are big.
    Tomahawk missle.
    Tomahawk.....Tomahawk......Oh and um Tomahawk.🤣

  • @quantico_x9320
    @quantico_x9320 2 года назад

    Nice???

  • @Werepie
    @Werepie 2 года назад +5

    This would be a great video, were it not voiced by this god-awful, overused robo-narrator.

  • @pankajpankaj7041
    @pankajpankaj7041 Год назад

    I wonder to understand tomhack tracking technology, it's very advanced and critical. 👍

  • @deykiidey6495
    @deykiidey6495 6 месяцев назад

    Your f16 price shown in this vide is inaccurate because real f 16 cost 63 million dollars.

  • @ToBeIsWasWere
    @ToBeIsWasWere Год назад +1

    bro why do you only speak singular

  • @arefkr
    @arefkr 2 года назад +2

    It's not the Gulf War. It is the Persian Gulf war.

  • @notagudartistbutiamtrying1854
    @notagudartistbutiamtrying1854 Год назад

    Mscope makes videos. Mscope make video about missile. Mscope not use word The.

  • @xyz-iz2kf
    @xyz-iz2kf Год назад

    brahmos

  • @vyrezayem_rusnyu
    @vyrezayem_rusnyu 2 года назад +8

    please launch them to russia

  • @johnpennington7107
    @johnpennington7107 2 года назад +1

    The speed needs to be upgraded to match the rest of the world and has to be able to go around defense system to hit their targets.

    • @mrthunderhawk
      @mrthunderhawk 2 года назад +7

      No it doesn’t, first:
      Tomahawk is build for relative low speed to not attract to much attention (sonic boom)
      Second:
      A missile going supersonic is harder to build
      Third:
      She wasn’t designed for this kind of mission. It was prolly build for quantity over speed, so like:
      If I can bring in one missile fast enough to not be shot down, can I do the same by bringing several in the area for less money?
      Also. To avoid shootdowns it would have to go hypersonic because of Defense missiles going mach 5 and over

    • @gromxxx
      @gromxxx 2 года назад +5

      As a rule supersonic missiles have shorter range due to solid fuel engine or larger jet engine that consumes too much fuel increasing the size, weight and needing larger platforms. Russian Granit or Vulcan missiles weigh 7 tons each with 600-1000km range and a massive heat signature seen from space.

    • @mrthunderhawk
      @mrthunderhawk 2 года назад

      @@gromxxx well, if you argue like this, you have to say that the longe the „boost“ is, so to say the acceleration, you achieve speed and with it range.
      Am I thinking right?

    • @gromxxx
      @gromxxx 2 года назад +4

      @@mrthunderhawk in order to sustain supersonic speed through the entire flight path of the missile you need to engine to work throughout consuming massive amounts of fuel. Beyond cruise speed the fuel necessary to sustain the flight rises exponentially hence the weight and size of those missiles.

  • @MikeHunt-rw4gf
    @MikeHunt-rw4gf 2 года назад

    Algorithm.

  • @nigelT16
    @nigelT16 2 года назад +2

    Although very technologically impressive, leave it to humans to put this much time and $$ into death and destruction

  • @rabidpeanut3703
    @rabidpeanut3703 Год назад

    Why does it sound like Tomahawk is speaking in the third person like elmo? English.