'Delight' is the right word to describe how it feels to see a new analysis pop up from Mr Hyatt. Always a rare and rich learning experience, thank-you. 🌷
Peter, you treat the subject with so much respect, and the family deserves the truth in order to come to terms with their loss. God bless them, and you, and may Sophie rest in peace.
I have missed you and learning from you. You are so talented and I really enjoy every analysis you do. I personally would like to see more of you and listen when you share your unique knowlegde.
Hi Peter, another impressive analysis. I look forward to seeing many more. I shared one of your videos with my family recently, and my step father who can be a little cynical about various matters (by his own admission) was really impressed with your analysis, especially by the way you explain/support your findings.
By the way Peter, he died living in really bad conditions...my Mother met him in Scibereen town...chatted away with a stranger about the case. I stood well back as I was minding my small child.....I honestly think the Irish Garda ( police) dropped the ball on this one. Beautiful looking woman Sophie...rest in peace
That excuse for a man was in receipt of monies for many years from the Irish state by way of social welfare. The state financed his education for several years while he studied law in U.C.C. I have always believed he was responsible for the murder . Look at his history. He hospitalised his long term partner on at least two occasions. There was years of abuse meted out by him towards her. The best indicator of future behaviour is past behaviour. Bailey has form. His arrogance personality wouldn't allow rejection and I imagine would result in huge rage and Sophie wouldn't have a hope of defending herself .
@@MaryJane-we9ec Domestic violence does not mean a person then goes on to murder a stranger. His ex-wife stated that he never hit her, so it appears limited to Jules. You would have to have half the men in West Cork on the list of suspects if domestic violence was the criteria. The police would have you believe that Bailey randomly and drunkenly decided to get up at 2am , staggered miles on a freezing cold, dark, December night and then knock on Sophie's door at 3am, when he had no idea who would answer the door, lover, son or Sophie. There is no evidence that he knew she had just turned up in Ireland, so how does he know she is there anyway? There is no evidence they they knew each other, so why was he there? The police then want you to believe that he attacked Sophie for sex, when there was no evidence of sexual assault. So he drunkenly chased her to the gate and frenziedly attacked her? Well he did all this while drunk, yet did not leave any forensic evidence, not one fingerprint, no hair, no blood, no skin, no dna, no saliva, absolutely NOTHING despite the scene being awash with blood. He then supposedly staggered home drunk, cleaned himself up, leaving no evidence of the attack. That really makes sense to you?
That is good news Peter. Poor Sophie, may she rest in peace. I watched an interview her parents, it was heartbreaking. Her poor father now deceased. May her rest in peace. Compassion and condolences to Sophie’s mother and her son, who is an only child and now a grown man who has had to carry this terrible loss and pain. I recall very clearly early on in the case, Ian Bailey now deceased. A radio interview, no long after Sophie’s murder, she said people described her as beautiful looking, he said he did not think so , I know he made a very direct comment that insulted her looks. I cannot fully remember- he said he found her or saw her, my first instinct is saying rather ugly but it could have been rather plain. I remember my feeling at the time of anger and disgust and also thinking there is a cruel arrogance to this. A kind of daring in your face attitude. Only today did I watch an interview with you for the first time. About Madeline McCann with Shaun, a very good listener. I left a comment there, that I would like to reiterate about your work. I am finding it very helpful, this clarity and it is about experiencing undermining, the word does not conjure up the totality of the experience. Responses of undermining for e.g in intimate partner relationships without physical violence, the reaction naturally is going to have a lot of emotional content. So some women are seen as overly emotional and highly strung and other women are seen as depressed. When this is looked at closer, this is then attributed to other causes. Your work has a whole lot of application in supporting a person who is being abused to trust themselves. I also add that there are therapists who are extremely undermining and this does a whole lot of harm to the person’s sense of self trust, where self trust can seem like something beyond them. There is a counsellor in Ireland, Mr Done Hennessy, a wise elder at this stage who has spoken repeatedly and clearly about intimate partner abuse. He has written 3 books all available on Amazon. How he gets into her head. Steps to Freedom. How he gets away with it. The 3rd book is the one, where he shows with absolute clarity, the tricks, the manipulations and the lack of delving into the language. Your expertise has a very strong role in building up this piece in a useful way, particularly in the court system. This is where these (mostly guys) Get away with it. And when dealing with lawyers etc. The words are powerful. Lundy Bancroft. An American writer doing the same work has talked about how women have lost custody. Both men can describe how women have to allow their children spend time post separation with these very abusive men. These children, in their formative years are in a position to now be trained to accept what is not true as true. This makes them vulnerable as adults. There is a huge gap around the language piece that has not been explored or developed. Unfortunately Don Hennessy is not being widely listened to and his final book is not well edited. I really hope you see this message and can find a way of following up. I heard a question about your training in the other interview. It could be so helpful. Don Hennessy’s book Steps to Freedom, he has his contact details in, and he has followed up on this. A man of integrity, courage and a mind of public service. He also has a 4 part podcast called Steps to Freedom. It is with another woman and she is the lead, interviewing him. Finally I will say that Don Hennessy is from Co Cork and he and his wife raised their family in Co Cork and they still live there. This is the county where Sophie was murdered, perhaps the Holy Spirit guided me here. Compassion to all who have suffered from abuse and compassion to all who have lost loved ones due to abuse and violence ❤️🩹. Compassion and respect to you and all other persons who use your skills and experience in the betterment of society
@Mary Jane, I know he was a horrible person and pit his poor partner through hell. Now that he has passed on, I hope she can pick up the pieces of her life and may her remaining years be healthy and peaceful. She has adult daughters that are good to her and she is a talented artist. The fact of Isn Baileys horrible intimate partner abuse is well known. Women have been killed by their abusive partners. Sadly this has happened to a number of women in Ireland in very recent years. A Cork man Don Hennessy has spent years educating and advocating for women abused by partners. He has continued this work well into his 70’s He is a rock if sense, plain speaking and a man of courage and integrity. Ian Bailey was a horrible person, he has now gone to meet his maker. He was also a very intelligent person, with the books that is- but he lacked intelligence in a lot of other areas. He availed of every opportunity that the social system had- it is good we have welfare and education grants for people of low income. So he used what was there, he brazened it out and stayed local. I hear your frustration. I too am a person of heart and fairness. I have experienced some horrible injustices, despite being capable and courageous. The thing is though, I’m very straight and had no clue about very sneaky, self serving, well educated, skilled liars. I am saying that to give context- I hear your emotion. I hear your cry for justice and fairness. Sophie, her case was very badly blundered by the police, a local woman repeatedly told a very serious lie, a big piece of evidence went missing, a gate. The case of police harassment against Bailey was upheld. The law must be stuck to. Otherwise it is not the law and the legal teams for guilty people, I truly do not know how they can sleep at night. I could never do that work, I doubt you could also. Maybe a good way to direct energy in Sophie’s memory is to advocate for greater awareness of domestic abuse and for continued and updated police training and inservice training. I wish you well
Thank you Mr. Hyatt for sharing your expertise . I would be really interested to see your analysis of Naomie Jeffs's statements in the docuseries Preaching Evil : A wife on the run with Warren Jeffs , regarding the culpability of her husband and the way people see her .
Thank you, Peter ❤ I've been waiting for this, and it's been worth the wait. Excellent analysis of the murderer,Ian Bailey's diary, and statements . A truly evil man Will the team be sharing their findings ? #JusticeforSophieToscanduPlantier
I thought l could read English plain text and now it's coming accross as Shakespeare in complexity ? The conflicted mind leaks Thanks to Peter and team
The police management of this case was shocking. Unfortunately that is what jeopardised the case the most. And the behaviour of police towards him met the criteria for harassment. The law is the law and even the most basic parts and mundane parts of police work are vital, in a well presented case a tiny early procedural misstep could result in no conviction. This must have been a huge shock for the local police to come upon, out of the blue, in a very remote area, in the depth of winter. Then to make matters worse, a local woman who was all over the national news talking about seeing a tall figure at the Coolfadabridge, leaning over, wearing a big dark coat blowing in the wind … in time to come she told the courts it was all lies. This area is small, and we now know it has a culture of gossip. There seems to have been a lack of reflection by the police about this witness. Then a physically very large and heavy piece of material evidence goes missing, a gate. And as has been upheld by the law, Mr Bailey was harassed by the police. Mr Hyatt here explains he is doing a specific skill about language analysis, but none of that can solve this case legally due to how it was handled. There is a great opportunity for learning in what went wrong. If done properly that can result in advancement in police training and inservice training and be holistic to include not only all the legal implications of every step but a reflection on what rural policing entails and the social and emotional elements of detecting serious and brutal crime within one’s community. Sed
One would have to wonder knowing what he did to his partner through the years and what he did to Sophie as to whether he has killed any other woman. Over 50 hits with a rock to her and dropping a concrete block on her head is a brutal level of aggression. The Police were very incompetent in their investigation.
DV, which did happen in his marriage at the time Sophie was murdered, is def a huge red flag and a sign he is capable of extreme violence. Yet there are also killer types who hide their behavior (Bundy was infamous for this as his girlfriends had zero idea what he was doing) and compartmentalize their lives in ways that are stunning to the rest of us who are not sociopaths and/or pathological liars. GSK (Joseph D’Angelo) never appeared in any files on the many murder cases in which he was responsible, his police coworkers never picked up “bad vibes” from him, and he seemed to be a basic if prone to stupid flare-ups in anger at neighbors etc. grandfather type.
I think Jules Thomas suffers from post-traumatic brain-injury , due to all those beatings from Ian Bailey. She’s the victim of coersive control and senere abuse. She in my opnion, is the accomplish. She covered up for Ian Bailey and now Jules Thomas is covering up for herself.
I’m sorry I missed the live today because I have so many questions pertaining to this situation. When someone is guilty, it seems they’ll forever have two personalities, but still have only their one language bank to draw from. Can you differentiate between which personality they’re putting forth by how they use their words, so you can tell which “person” you’re talking to at the moment, or is their structural use of language the same? As a human, is it generally harder to lie by giving a false, definitive “I didn’t kill Sophie” than it is committing a heinous act? Is statement analysis of suspects words over the years prioritized for clues in cold cases? The current Idaho 4 case is an example where the suspect has yet to publicly say “I didn’t kill them.” Is analysis of his current recorded correspondence from jail being scrutinized for his use of language for embedded clues, or does the gag order inhibit that?
His sympathy was genuine! Ian was damned if he did say anything sympathetic and damned even if he did not! What is being said is reprehensible nonsense!
I really think he liked to play everyone. He was a highly intelligent man and he also studied law after this murder and sued the state over his treatment as a suspect. I think he is playing with the law and the police and the locals with a lot of this.
He pretty much never said Sophie's name. His entire life was about becoming someone he wasn't. Trying to overcome a deep inadequacy. An affected accent, the outlandish clothes, hats, a huge staff, calling himself a poet. He thought he was superior and could outwit everyone. Chasing the limelight no matter what. A machiavellian narcissist- most if not everything he said was disingenuous, hiding in plain sight behind a veil of pretentiousness. May Sophie's beautiful spirit rise in freedom.
@@fredbloggs545 Bailey knew about the murder too early according to three locals. Bailey went immediately to Sophie’s house because a “foreign national” had been murdered near Schull, an area full of foreigners. Bailey had a history of brutal violence towards women. Bailey had a big fire behind his house, burning clothes at the time. Bailey had noticeable scratches on his face and hands at the time. Bailey happened to go wandering for a few hours on the night of the murder. Bailey told several people he had done it afterwards. Add that into a ton more indicators his malignant narcissism and more besides. I know who I believe did it. The French courts also knew.
@@lululiga333 "Bailey knew about the murder too early according to three locals." No he didn't. A friend of her neighbour Alfie knew that it was Sophie before noon. That friend lives miles away in Cork City! Alfie and Shirley had a telephone, within minutes they would have been phoning their friends and family. The local priest and local doctor who attended within the hour would have been informing all they knew too. By 11-12 noon the whole village would know, because they all have telephones. Quite why you people insist on this nobody knowing anything nonsense is puzzling to me, it's like you don't know how gossip works in a small town and you think telephones didn't exist. "Bailey went immediately to Sophie’s house because a “foreign national” had been murdered near Schull, an area full of foreigners" Bailey claims that Eddie Cassidy mentioned she was French in the phone call he made to him. Cassidy denies this, however he is an unreliable witness as he also made claims about the timings of calls he made to others, which police found to be wrong. Cassidy claimed for example that he had not phoned somebody, when records showed that he had, three times. He is clearly not reliable, so when he claims he did not mention her being French to Bailey, that should be questioned. Bailey knew that Sophie lived at the cottage because he was friends with her neighbour Alfie. Not hard to figure out why he would first try there since it was close-by. "Bailey had a history of brutal violence towards women." No he does not, his violence has been limited to his relationship with Jules. He has no history of violence against "women", it is woman. His ex-wife stated that he did not hit her. Those who are involve with domestic violence don't generally go on to murder a complete stranger. If they did, then many men in Ireland would be suspects to her murder. I note you failed to mention Karl Heinz Wolney who was a drunken, violent, wife-beater. He lived closer to Sophie and was in town the night she was in town that day. He had no alibi and committed suicide two months later allegedly saying that he had done something terrible. "Bailey had a big fire behind his house, burning clothes at the time." No he didn't. Jules stated that she emptied out her studio house (not their home) burning items, such as a mattress. She said this was November. Police stated that they found nothing of interest in the remains of the bonfire. "Bailey had noticeable scratches on his face and hands at the time." He did, we know this because Jules' daughters gave statements in support of Bailey saying that the scratches were there before the murder! "Bailey happened to go wandering for a few hours on the night of the murder." Bailey stated that he got up to write an article that had a deadline. He wrote it in the kitchen then went to the studio house 300 yards away to where he typed it. Jules found the article on the kitchen table the next morning. The paper confirmed that he had submitted the article and that they published it. Jules said that he often left the bed to write. "Bailey told several people he had done it afterwards. " He was using sarcasm in the face of ridiculous accusations being put to him. The DPP report makes this clear and when you read the context you will understand why. You have actually read the DPP report, yes? As it appears not from the nonsense you have written. "The French courts also knew." That will be the French court that used Marie Farrell's LIE that she admitted was lies, yes? You think it acceptable that a person should be convicted of murder in a court that KNEW they were using lies? Is that acceptable to you, is it?
Doesn't mean he did it? Where was the evidence it's just hearsay? He may have been a real horrible person but was he there at the bridge that night or not? It was never proven he was wandering about that night? They also said he was writing the article in the cottage. It came down to the sighting that Marie Farrell later redacted and ran away from the trial.What about Marie Farrells alibi and the man in the car? Or what about Alfie Lyons alibi?
Most people's evidence of Bailey comes from documentaries and Netflix which was completely biased. Bailey met the description of the murderer. There was no evidence he walked the four miles that night in the dark after drink to find out if Sophie was there. He knew he had to write the article to get paid. The more I think about this case anyone could of been the murderer included her neighbours who obviously used each other as alibis. Also why did Marie Farrell never reveal the person she was with that night in public? She and her lover or partner could of been the murderer. What were they really doing near the bridge? Did she really see Bailey and that prompted her to make the call? Why didn't Sophie call someone in the house if she was been attacked? Why didn't see pick up her keys and drive away? Why did she lace up her boots and put on her dressing gown and go to the bottom of the gate? Was she been chased? Why didnt ring her neighbours? Look at the distance from the house to the bottom of the gate. Why did the husband specifically ring at midnight? Why did someone use a concrete block it's almost like they didn't want her to be recognised anymore? Why would Sophie have two separate glasses of wine built up on the draining board? Did she wash them or someone else? Why did she have a breakfast or when did she digest the food? Was it from the previous day? Did she have someone staying over with her? Why didn't her neighbours hear her screaming? There was way more to the story than just Bailey.
Sophie's story is so fascinating (beyond the horrific way she died). I was suspicious of her husband, and the sighting of a frenchman in the area who may have been despatched...to despatch Sophie. Ive sometimes felt that the Journalist was purposefully putting doubt as tonhis innocence. He spent a lot of time in court, and now cant return home. Cant wait to hear what you have to say, Peter
That’s how I have felt too but also interested in the the German national who lived one mile from Sophie, who disappeared back to Germany shortly after Sophie’s death, then committing suicide after confessing to a friend that he had ‘done a terrible thing’.
Yes it was Marie Farrell who said she saw someone outside he to shop watching Sophie who was dressed like a french man. Then she claimed she saw someone at the bridge washing his boots. Then she said it was Bailey then she said it wasn't crazy stuff that delayed and swayed the whole narrative of the events of Sophie's death. No body ever mentions the taping of the police station in Pantry. Regardless of Ian's behaviour or demeanor they were out to get Bailey anyway. Loads of evidence went missing in the case.
@olearymiriam well I rest my case. If the sighting was by Marie Farrel then it can't be taken as truthful as she's a known lier. I wonder did she ever see anyone 🤔. The night of the murder, or outside her shop or any other time.
I suspected her husband too (maybe not he personally but set it up) as he didn't bother to come and take his beautiful wife back home to France. Left her lying there over Christmas. Poor Sophie. May she rest in peace.
Hello mr Hyatt. I recently found out about you; You are amazing and thank you for your knowledge and sharing🙏🏼 I have a question; Do you know the Netflix series ‘making a murderer.’ Would you look into the story. It’s so sad. It’s years ago I watched it and to know that nobody knows if innocent people are in jail…. I really would love to hear your words and thoughts about it Because it seems nobody want to burn their fingers on the case Wishing you all best and maintains of health. 😊🍀☀️
IF he was such a sensitive soul (that he could let the family have the solace of thinking of him as the killer) why was he not sensitive to the possible future victims of another attack by the ‘REAL’ killer. One would think it would be important to him that no other person becomes a victim of this unknown killer!!!
@@HumanimalChannel I’m not familiar with the case. I’m just going by what I’m seeing in the language…and his ‘sensitive nature’ doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.
@@007nadineL Brutal killer, yet the DPP who saw all the evidence refused to even charge him, TWICE. Do you have evidence that the experienced Barristers at the DPP have not?
Thank you Peter, great analysis of the suspect's words showing his guilt. He was insuffereable to listen to and I found him repulsive to look at ( on video ) even if there had never been a murder and if he hadn't been the suspect. It was annoying to hear him say in every interview that he "knew"that he had "nothing to do with it" in that old maiden aunt voice of his beneath his pretentious posh accent.
@@fredbloggs545 Obviously if I was on a jury I couldn't base my decision going by Statement Analysis or even from hearing the underlying truth beneath the accused person's words because jurors have to provide reasons based on facts to the other jurors for their decision. In that particular case there was so much factual common sense evidence that it's strange that he wasn't brought to Trial. Apart from that, no one says that they "know" they didn't do something as serious as murdering someone and to say it about less important things actually suggests a lack of certainty. He even denied his guilt in some interviews by saying: "You know you had nothing to do with it." Then there's the "nothing to do with it" that he always said instead of saying "I didn't kill her", this suggests that either blamed Sophie for his crazy, drink fuelled attack on her or blamed alcohol or believed that he was possessed. He blamed Jules and drink for him battering her and putting her in hospital as well as tearing clumps of hair from her head. He would have given up drink after that appalling crime if he had taken responsibility and been sorry. He even blamed his baby sister for the downturn his life took after her birth when he was around seven because he claimed that she too used to lie about him to their parents about him having hurt her. Babies and small children don't cry and lie about older siblings hurting them.
Amazing analysis Peter… What amazing work you do.. It’s so detailed, precise and analytical. You scientifically and linguistically explain what we feel energetically but haven’t got the words! If that makes sense! I feel Certain that the work you and your network are doing ,will be in even more demand due to this crazy era of mass communication manipulation. You guys are light workers. 🧖🏼♂️🧖🏼♂️🧖🏼♂️🧖🏼♂️ thanks for sharing your knowledge…
I listened to some longer recent interviews he gave, and, there is something so disconcerting in that way he speaks, the tone, the very relax3d style at times, but also a very STUDIED way about him, and of course after a long time he has a lot of answers ready. He knows people knpw how vile he has been tomwomen esp his long term relationship but acts as if things just ran their course and the pressure damaged the relationship -rather than his actions. He must be quite practised in persuasion, and manipulation . Is his Harrow schoolboy accent real? I do doubt it.
I've been hoping and waiting for you to do this. His former partner Jules Thomas was asked after his death how she felt. She said she didn't really feel much and now cannot see what she saw in him. But she is still steadfast that Ian did not kill Sophie. I had hoped she would tell the truth. However she did say she is currently writing a book. I really hope she finally tells what she knows. Thank you Peter. Love your videos.
"I had hoped she would tell the truth." Why have you not considered that she is telling the truth? Your bias is obvious and you are another disgusting individual accusing Jules without any evidence.
I think Jules Thomas suffered from Post-traumatic brain-injury , due to several beatings from Ian Bailey and years of coersive control. Jules Thomas is the accomplish. She covered up for Ian Bailey and now, she ‘s covering up for herself. IF she tells the truth - the Courts Will show leniance.
I totally agree with you. She was beaten to a pulp on several occasions that we know of for sure, plus the years and years of being worn down by a controlling narcissist. Amazing she even had the strength to get him out of her life. But she did it. I really do hope she comes clean now. Sophie's family deserve that much. @@acb5245
Love your work Mr. Hyatt! There's a case I'd be interested in hearing your analysis on. Ladonna Batty, nurse vacationing in the Bahamas gets raped on a beach with her friend. I apologize I don't have a link but something she said in the article I read seemed strange.
I live in Ireland and whilst you do some interesting analysis and I like your work, you don't have the granularity of detail and missed key evidence in this instance - in short you have misread the core case. He was the local oddball and prone to domestic violence, but it is extremely unlikely he killed her due to simple logistics, but he stood out especially as coincidentally he was the stringer who was called to cover the murder by big newspapers. He made matters worse for himself by becoming flattered that he was considered a murder suspect and when drunk used to hint he did it just to try to 'impress' people. Nonetheless, the lack of clear evidence (any evidence) is why the DPP, your DA, refused to prosecute him and dismantled the 'evidence' the police tried to use. The reality was the police decided he did it and then went looking for evidence, even pressurising a woman to claim she saw him in a vital location; she was having an affair. Subsequently she withdrew the testimony. To this day whilst the 'man in the street' believes he did it, serious journalists, state lawyers and the upper echelons of the police believe there was no case against him. Bailey subsequently graduated with a law degree and tried to sue various papers who implied he did it; unfortunately because he was an odious individual who had boasted that he did do it, he lost the case. Our Attorney General, same as yours, came to the same conclusion and along with the Supreme Court refused to extradite him to France, for the simple reason was that all the French did was take the tainted Irish police evidence and use that to convict him without any defence offered by him. Thus we had the bizarre legal situation that Ireland refused to prosecute him, the courts refused to send him to France, but the French convicted him on disproven evidence from the Irish Police which Ireland itself had dismissed. Even worse, the European Arrest Warrant meant he could not leave Ireland and travel to any European country, even his home country of the UK. He could not visit his ill mother before she died or attend the funeral. What we learn from this case is the integrity of the Irish judicial system in that it refused to go along with a Lynch mob who wanted to 'string up' the local weirdo.
Yeah, rhe French "trial" is an embarasament! Utrerly ludkcrous. Wouldn't like to be accused of stealing a baguette in france! They showed their utter bias and that it was a "witchhunt". There should be some way they should have to have their own ruling stand up in some sort of international review courr!!! The way theybran that case would ve dismantled as fiction immediately. Sophie's marriage was over and there was pride and a lot of money at stake
That may all be true but my understanding is that Peter does statement analysis only. He doesn’t (as I understand it) look at evidence or the lack thereof. His specialty is using the words of people, and only their words, to assess guilt or whatever he is tasked with looking for. This is his analysis based on the man’s own words. The rest is irrelevant to the matter at hand, analysing his words.
@@Lollipop_Lexi Took the words rights out of my mouth. This is about statement analysis - analysing Ian Bailey's words, and not about police evidence or incompetence etc.
Watch 30:56 to 31:23 and that's exactly what he does, ending with 'here's your killer' or 'he's your killer'. The entire analysis is premised on Bailey being the killer and when Mr. Hyatt says there was no denial of the police evidence or no rebuke of it, that's also simply factually incorrect. The Irish equivalent of the District Attorney and the Attorney General of the country systematically dismantled and rebuked the evidence of his guilt and the Supreme Court refused to extradite on these grounds. Bailey himself went to court to sue for defamation over it, that sounds like a denial or rebuking to me. Bailey was an oddball, a weirdo and 'wife' beater and an narcissist, but not a killer. It was a case of 'round up the usual suspects' And if he is not guilty, then the statement analysis which points towards his guilt is wrong. @@Lollipop_Lexi
I have always thought, that irrespective of whether he did it or not, he is the sort of character who would ' get away with it'. He was a Fleet Street crime journalist who was forensically aware. There was no evidence against him that would sustain a conviction of murder in a common law jurisdiction. The conviction in France (prove you didn’t do it) is scary … the crime was not committed in France … The French police did not carry out the investigation … the defendant was not before the court … the defendant was not represented in court … a single sided prosecution with no rebuttal and what verdict do you expect?
I believed it was him from day one. This just further confirms it for me. He’s so obviously a malignant narcissist/psychopath. Notorious liars manipulators and violent. His ex was under his spell and control like many abused women. I read that she finally left him and that her daughters despise him. I bet Jules knew more but was afraid to admit it. Such a pity he died without paying for her murder. Such a miscarriage of justice for her family. At least they know now that he’s wandering around free getting drunk and poking at them with disgusting statements. Hopefully they will feel further peace and closure now.
@lululiga333 "and that her daughters despise him" Since Jules' daughters gave supporting statements that Bailey's scratches were present before the murder, the fact that they "despise him" means that they are being truthful and he did indeed have scratches before the murder. If Jules, "knew more", then her daughters would also have to know more and be involved as they gave those supporting statements, despite hating the guy. Why would people who you say "despise him", give such supporting statements unless those statements were actually true? Which then blows a hole in the police theory that the scratches were from the murder. Are you getting all your nonsense from Netflix? Well?
Fortunately the legal professionals who saw all the evidence refused to charge him on two occasions. When even the prosecution say the evidence is just not there, you should be listening to them. Of course they aren't getting their belief from watching Netflix though!
He was convicted but in France. Apparently the gaurds felt they didn't have enough evidence, the French police say they had enough. He just didn't do any prison time.
He wasn't guilty, the corrupt garda tried to set him up but they couldn't, if he was guilty they would have found something. Your man in this video is full of shite 😂
@@Victoria12339 He was convicted in France due to the French court knowingly using Marie Farrell's lie that she had witnessed him near the scene. They knew it was a lie as she admitted it was a lie, yet still used it. That's how corrupt the French system is.
Absolute inciorrect and deeply biased analysis bu Peter - Ian was set up for this crime, deliberately so in order to protect the true criminal which was one of their own (a Garda).
Have you ever done the Jeremy bamber case? I no it's a long time ago but plenty of footage to analyse and witnesses etc, and new appeal ment to be in the works, lots of people think he is innocent and plenty think guilty, Would love to no what you think about the case.
I dont believe ian did it, people commenting about this case forget the local police tried everything to pick theforeigner who liked to stand out and was a bit of a narcissist. No evidence and uaed witness statements that were given free phones by police and one local lady that was a liar that took her statement back about seeing a man that looked like brady on a road nearby. Crime scene was completely ruined and everyone stillsays this guy drunkenly stumbled a mile across fields and was so angry that a woman turned him down that he used a cement block to cave her head in. Thats why the irish wouldn't force bailey to trial in france because french trial was using already debunked evidence from terrible local police investigation.
Ps_french trial was a farce. Nothing ever mentioned about her french husband at the time who didn't go with her to Ireland and never even came over after this type killing felt personal and a hitman isn't rediculous
And it was probably a Frenchman who killed Sophie . Het marruage was over, and she was conducting affairs at the cottage. She didnt want to spend Christmas in france. And maybe knew her husband might try something becaus3 she didnt want to go alone. Ian was an easy target/scapegoat.. Esp with his questionable background with his relationships. Id thought he like make people not be sure about him, but its hard to decide whats true. About to listen to Petrr's analysis, cant wait!
I have a question re this case. Why a w itness whom claimed to have seen a person on the night the lady was murdered at a bridge near the village and not too far from the scene was allowed to run from a court house .and also change her story from the original story .. i mean if a person runs from a court house that surely is contempt . but nothing was done .. and still this person has never cleared up whom she was with that night and what exactly she saw at this very rural part of Irl. where strangers really stand out . and what she saw or who she saw . was not a stranger .
Very poor police work, lots of high emotions in a small community, every knows everyone and no-one is going to say, the casework was seriously substandard, and all the emotions stay high and get redirected.
I do not know if he was innocent. The police work was seriously sub standard. In law a person has the right of presumed innocence and he did experience bullying and harassment. The local closed community mentality needs be examined in terms of what fuel the ongoing narrative. Yes he was a creep, an abusive partner, well able to use the system as it exists to his benefit, for e.g. law degree. He courted publicity, made horrible comments, did not seem to have any redeeming personal qualities. He was an outsider, no relations in this rural area and made no positive contribution to his community. All of this is absolutely true. However the law is the law and then we can consider civics, ethics and morality. The behaviour of each person is their responsibility, unless medically impaired. This is something that needs reflection as West Cork is not shining here.
You also have to remember at the time the police stations were being taped. They were corrupt as hell. They needed someone quick to be the scapegoats as they botched the forensics because it took ages for the pathologist to come down they would of been quicker flying the person in from London the getting someone from Dublin. He may have been an abnoxious, attention seeking man but where is the real evidence he killed her. It could of been the neighbours, the people up at the bridge, local people in the area other than Bailey, a drug gang she uncovered, someone stealing or trying to break into the house. Marie Farrells statements didn't help. They had it in for Bailey and they ruined his life. Anyone could of been there that night including those who all gave their alibis they all could of been lying.
I dont like the look of sophey husband he was a director of this murder i think he had alot to gain married guite soon after sophey murder not much love their
I'm from cork and this murder transfixed the nation ever since..the police did a very bad job on this case but the way I look at it is either Bailey was innocent and perversely loved the attention that people thought he did or he did it and loved the attention...either was he was a narcissistic man, who I feel 80% sure killed her...in the Netflix doc the timeline that he knew things hours before the murder had even been reported was the most daming
The Netflix one that had Sophie's, cousin as a producer and the full support of the family and Guards? Where it had the senior detective inferring that Bailey's coat was burned, when in fact it was taken as evidence and cut for samples and he knew it was? It did not challenge that senior officers blatant lie? The timeline that did not mention people in Cork city knowing before noon that it was Sophie that had been murdered, because Alfie and Shirley had an amazing device called a telephone and would have called the whole town by 10.30am! Of course the documentary also failed to point out that Bailey got much of his speculation wrong and that other news sources reported aspects of the case before he did. How about when it showed the person who stayed with Jules and Ian stating that she had seen a coat in a bucket, when in fact she was lying, her statement at the time said clothes in the bath? Again she was not challenged and I wonder why? How about somebody conveniently "remembering" *19 YEARS* later that Sophie had spoken about Bailey on the telephone? Yeah totally reliable and unbiased documentary produced by Sophie's cousin that was.... 🙂 Have a search for this exact term and read what the prosecution thought of their own police investigation. It may shock you like it did me after I was conned by Netflix. They refused to even charge him, twice! I was left astounded that I had watched something so blatanty biased. Sophie Toscan Du Plantier DPP File 2001 pdfcoffee
Yes, the police did a very bad job. Still there is room for redemption and that is something for Sophie. If the police study in a very detailed way even minute police step. If they look at what was done correctly and what was done incorrectly, that is 100% by the book and then formulate a detailed training from all of this. The mistakes, the not doing the Mr Ploddy 100% by the book can bring down an entire case. They can then look in detail at the cases where correct procedures were upheld and the outcome. It is tough work. There are two parts one crime scenes and physical evidence, this is where a garda of a lower rank can be working and ever rule he knows and maintains to the law is really important. It is also emotional, it is horrible, it could be local, it could be anytime of the day or night. All the senior staff could be busy or else where or a garda could come upon a scene, this happens for e.g 999 calls and domestic violence. Or 999 call, tip off and children left unsupervised and neglected. So then need to be calm, sharp and emotionally controlled is huge and to follow all procedures with writing and maintaining evidence. The detectives investigate and interview, they also need alertness , emotional calm, following procedures and write ups. Cases that have been hugely helped by good and thorough police work should also be examined in detail on this case. About 45 years ago. A woman in Kildare went missing, near Christmas on her way home from work. I was very young at the time, and frequently exposed to “ The news on the black and white television, with a shush..”. I clearly remember the pictures on the news. It was probably thirty years later when the case was solved. I remember feeling like wanting to write to the police. The case was solved on dna evidence. Not available at the time. The garda who collected the sample from the boot of a man’s car- the car had been cleaned and smelled of bleach. He said milk had gotten spilled and went sour. The evidence was stored 100% by all rules of evidence in the Kildare police station a new station was built and this Garda made sure to transfer the sample following 100% % of the rules, just before he retired . The defence team used as an argument the age of the sample and the fact it was moved. That was all they had, that is how tightly they looked for a loophole. They found none. The suspect was found guilty of the rape and murder of Phylis Murphy RIP. He committed this horrible crime at a time when his wife was in hospital giving birth to another of his children. Another case Marylyn Rynn. RIP Marylyn was raped and murdered minutes from her home. She took the night link late bus home from a city centre Christmas Party and took a short cut through the local park in suburban Dublin. Her body was discovered in the bushes. The police investigated stretched to include interviewing a very wide range of men. Her co workers were asked if she ever met a male known to them. My then boyfriend and I happened to have been at the same party several months earlier. Her co worker was his friend and he was interviewed. The detective mat him over a coffee and asked questions. The listened closely to all interviews and took careful notes. One man had said something small that as they went back through their notes was different to other people. They re interviewed him and continued. The police on the scene of discovery followed all rules carefully and forensic materials were collected and all evidence managed well. She was dead for dome time and a sudden cold snap preserved DNA evidence. Her murderer was convicted. Most recently, the convicted murderer of Elaine O’Hara RIP, has appealed for a mistral due to the use of phone evidence and some part of the law- he is a horrific, brazen individual. He never thought he would be caught. He threw a phone and her keys and bag into a reservoir several miles and the opposite direction to where her body was found. Fate intervened as a heat wave the following Summer and the reservoir was unusually dry. That would have been unless without the diligence of a local garda in the village station. Guys fishing called him, they found the bag. He responded and then did what he called a fingertip search of the area- through the mucky water, he found the keys and the phone. He said he returned to the station put them in the drying room and entered all the evidence, details in the book and labelled each item. There is a team dedicated to looking for a number of missing Irish women. No bodies, no evidence. All this needs be used in detailed and thorough ways for training. It’s time to move away from the high emotions and Bailey was a creep but there was no for charging him. Another case 59 years old the disappearance of Mary Boyle age 7 in rural Donegal, believed dead and the perpetrator known. Gemma Doherty journalist did good work making a documentary on this and then ruined it through ego. She was advised by the solicitor of the documentary team and the solicitor of Justice for Mary Boyle to not say certain words and a name, this could have the potential to jeopardise any future legal action. Big ego- she went ahead and said it. In a democracy we have laws and the roles, rules and responsibilities must be upheld. That will always need additional training and inservice training for police. So it will be a way to bring some honour to Sophie and her family if the police use their worst out of this to create proper future pathways without scapegoating any individual.
'Delight' is the right word to describe how it feels to see a new analysis pop up from Mr Hyatt. Always a rare and rich learning experience, thank-you. 🌷
So rare that he got it all wrong - Ian Bailey RIP was set up, framed for a crime he did not commit.
This guy just keeps repeating the same thing over n over again,,,its nonsense.@@freedomunltd
@@shaunreynolds6978Exactly, it is absurd.
Peter, you treat the subject with so much respect, and the family deserves the truth in order to come to terms with their loss. God bless them, and you, and may Sophie rest in peace.
And an innocent man Ian Bailey lost the last 26 years of his life for a crine he did not commit.
I have missed you and learning from you.
You are so talented and I really enjoy every analysis you do.
I personally would like to see more of you and listen when you share your unique knowlegde.
It's always a treat when you share your mind with us. Thank you for so generously teaching statement analysis basics to us all
You are a gentleman and a scholar, Peter. Your opening to this video shows that. Thank you for all the work you do.
Hi Peter, another impressive analysis. I look forward to seeing many more.
I shared one of your videos with my family recently, and my step father who can be a little cynical about various matters (by his own admission) was really impressed with your analysis, especially by the way you explain/support your findings.
Good job peter..i live in ireland and this is one strange unsolved murder...that lovely girl was killed in a quiet place with no crime ...rip sophie
I'm always excited when I see a new video from you Peter ! You need to do more.
Watching from Ireland..thank you Peter
Thank you. From IRELAND
Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge ❤
Peter, is it possible to shrink your picture down and enlarge the transcript so we can follow along easier? Good stuff you're presenting.
Rest in peace 🙏
Sophie Du Plantier
28 July 1957 ~
23 December 1996⚘
Brilliant analysis as always!
jesus,,,listen to it,,,repeat,,repeat,,repeat the same sentence over n over again,,,its nonsense and you cant see it,.
Excellent topic. Thank you! Very thought provoking.
By the way Peter, he died living in really bad conditions...my Mother met him in Scibereen town...chatted away with a stranger about the case. I stood well back as I was minding my small child.....I honestly think the Irish Garda ( police) dropped the ball on this one. Beautiful looking woman Sophie...rest in peace
very sad case.
@@margaretwhittaker2291 dreadful...
my heart goes out to the family of Sophie.@@laetitialogan2017
Thank you so much fir keeping this case on the burner.
It would provide some measure of healing to Sophie's family if a resolution were found.
Ireland
The team is still working on it!
That excuse for a man was in receipt of monies for many years from the Irish state by way of social welfare.
The state financed his education for several years while he studied law in U.C.C.
I have always believed he was responsible for the murder .
Look at his history. He hospitalised his long term partner on at least two occasions. There was years of abuse meted out by him towards her. The best indicator of future behaviour is past behaviour.
Bailey has form.
His arrogance personality wouldn't allow rejection and I imagine would result in huge rage and Sophie wouldn't have a hope of defending herself .
@@MaryJane-we9ec
Domestic violence does not mean a person then goes on to murder a stranger. His ex-wife stated that he never hit her, so it appears limited to Jules. You would have to have half the men in West Cork on the list of suspects if domestic violence was the criteria.
The police would have you believe that Bailey randomly and drunkenly decided to get up at 2am , staggered miles on a freezing cold, dark, December night and then knock on Sophie's door at 3am, when he had no idea who would answer the door, lover, son or Sophie. There is no evidence that he knew she had just turned up in Ireland, so how does he know she is there anyway? There is no evidence they they knew each other, so why was he there? The police then want you to believe that he attacked Sophie for sex, when there was no evidence of sexual assault. So he drunkenly chased her to the gate and frenziedly attacked her?
Well he did all this while drunk, yet did not leave any forensic evidence, not one fingerprint, no hair, no blood, no skin, no dna, no saliva, absolutely NOTHING despite the scene being awash with blood. He then supposedly staggered home drunk, cleaned himself up, leaving no evidence of the attack.
That really makes sense to you?
That is good news Peter. Poor Sophie, may she rest in peace. I watched an interview her parents, it was heartbreaking. Her poor father now deceased. May her rest in peace. Compassion and condolences to Sophie’s mother and her son, who is an only child and now a grown man who has had to carry this terrible loss and pain. I recall very clearly early on in the case, Ian Bailey now deceased. A radio interview, no long after Sophie’s murder, she said people described her as beautiful looking, he said he did not think so , I know he made a very direct comment that insulted her looks. I cannot fully remember- he said he found her or saw her, my first instinct is saying rather ugly but it could have been rather plain. I remember my feeling
at the time of anger and disgust and also thinking there is a cruel arrogance to this. A kind of daring in your face attitude.
Only today did I watch an interview with you for the first time. About Madeline McCann with Shaun, a very good listener. I left a comment there, that I would like to reiterate about your work. I am finding it very helpful, this clarity and it is about experiencing undermining, the word does not conjure up the totality of the experience. Responses of undermining for e.g in intimate partner relationships without physical violence, the reaction naturally is going to have a lot of emotional content. So some women are seen as overly emotional and highly strung and other women are seen as depressed. When this is looked at closer, this is then attributed to other causes. Your work has a whole lot of application in supporting a person who is being abused to trust themselves. I also add that there are therapists who are extremely undermining and this does a whole lot of harm to the person’s sense of self trust, where self trust can seem like something beyond them. There is a counsellor in Ireland, Mr Done Hennessy, a wise elder at this stage who has spoken repeatedly and clearly about intimate partner abuse. He has written 3 books all available on Amazon. How he gets into her head. Steps to Freedom. How he gets away with it.
The 3rd book is the one, where he shows with absolute clarity, the tricks, the manipulations and the lack of delving into the language. Your expertise has a very strong role in building up this piece in a useful way, particularly in the court system. This is where these (mostly guys) Get away with it.
And when dealing with lawyers etc. The words are powerful. Lundy Bancroft. An American writer doing the same work has talked about how women have lost custody. Both men can describe how women have to allow their children spend time post separation with these very abusive men. These children, in their formative years are in a position to now be trained to accept what is not true as true. This makes them vulnerable as adults. There is a huge gap around the language piece that has not been explored or developed. Unfortunately Don Hennessy is not being widely listened to and his final book is not well edited. I really hope you see this message and can find a way of following up. I heard a question about your training in the other interview. It could be so helpful. Don Hennessy’s book Steps to Freedom, he has his contact details in, and he has followed up on this. A man of integrity, courage and a mind of public service. He also has a 4 part podcast called Steps to Freedom. It is with another woman and she is the lead, interviewing him. Finally I will say that Don Hennessy is from Co Cork and he and his wife raised their family in Co Cork and they still live there. This is the county where Sophie was murdered, perhaps the Holy Spirit guided me here. Compassion to all who have suffered from abuse and compassion to all who have lost loved ones due to abuse and violence ❤️🩹. Compassion and respect to you and all other persons who use your skills and experience in the betterment of society
@Mary Jane, I know he was a horrible person and pit his poor partner through hell. Now that he has passed on, I hope she can pick up the pieces of her life and may her remaining years be healthy and peaceful. She has adult daughters that are good to her and she is a talented artist. The fact of Isn Baileys horrible intimate partner abuse is well
known. Women have been killed by their abusive partners. Sadly this has happened to a number of women in Ireland in very recent years. A Cork man Don Hennessy has spent years educating and advocating for women abused by partners. He has continued this work well into his 70’s He is a rock if sense, plain speaking and a man of courage and integrity. Ian Bailey was a horrible person, he has now gone to meet his maker. He was also a very intelligent person, with the books that is- but he lacked intelligence in a lot of other areas. He availed of every opportunity that the social system had- it is good we have welfare and education grants for people of low income. So he used what was there, he brazened it out and stayed local. I hear your frustration. I too am a person of heart and fairness. I have experienced some horrible injustices, despite being capable and courageous. The thing is though, I’m very straight and had no clue about very sneaky, self serving, well educated, skilled liars. I am saying that to give context- I hear your emotion. I hear your cry for justice and fairness. Sophie, her case was very badly blundered by the police, a local woman repeatedly told a very serious lie, a big piece of evidence went missing, a gate. The case of police harassment against Bailey was upheld. The law must be stuck to. Otherwise it is not the law and the legal teams for guilty people, I truly do not know how they can sleep at night. I could never do that work, I doubt you could also.
Maybe a good way to direct energy in Sophie’s memory is to advocate for greater awareness of domestic abuse and for continued and updated police training and inservice training. I wish you well
Thank you Mr. Hyatt for sharing your expertise . I would be really interested to see your analysis of Naomie Jeffs's statements in the docuseries Preaching Evil : A wife on the run with Warren Jeffs , regarding the culpability of her husband and the way people see her .
Very interesting, thank you Mr Hyatt for helping us see into language.
I would love to see Mr. Hyatt's take on the interrogation of Michelle Troconis!
Thank you Peter 💕
Thank you, Peter ❤
I've been waiting for this, and it's been worth the wait. Excellent analysis of the murderer,Ian Bailey's diary, and statements . A truly evil man
Will the team be sharing their findings ?
#JusticeforSophieToscanduPlantier
Thank you for your insight into this case.
I thought l could read English plain text and now it's coming accross as Shakespeare in complexity ?
The conflicted mind leaks
Thanks to Peter and team
Great to see you back on here 🙏🏽
Thank you
The police management of this case was shocking. Unfortunately that is what jeopardised the case the most. And the behaviour of police towards him met the criteria for harassment. The law is the law and even the most basic parts and mundane parts of police work are vital, in a well presented case a tiny early procedural misstep could result in no conviction. This must have been a huge shock for the local police to come upon, out of the blue, in a very remote area, in the depth of winter. Then to make matters worse, a local woman who was all over the national news talking about seeing a tall figure at the Coolfadabridge, leaning over, wearing a big dark coat blowing in the wind … in time to come she told the courts it was all lies. This area is small, and we now know it has a culture of gossip. There seems to have been a lack of reflection by the police about this witness. Then a physically very large and heavy piece of material evidence goes missing, a gate. And as has been upheld by the law, Mr Bailey was harassed by the police. Mr Hyatt here explains he is doing a specific skill about language analysis, but none of that can solve this case legally due to how it was handled. There is a great opportunity for learning in what went wrong. If done properly that can result in advancement in police training and inservice training and be holistic to include not only all the legal implications of every step but a reflection on what rural policing entails and the social and emotional elements of detecting serious and brutal crime within one’s community.
Sed
Thank you, Peter.
Always useful ❗❗
One would have to wonder knowing what he did to his partner through the years and what he did to Sophie as to whether he has killed any other woman. Over 50 hits with a rock to her and dropping a concrete block on her head is a brutal level of aggression. The Police were very incompetent in their investigation.
Yes and guess what he smashed up his long term partner’s face twice!.. The face. He like to smash faces.. He “ got away with murder”.
DV, which did happen in his marriage at the time Sophie was murdered, is def a huge red flag and a sign he is capable of extreme violence. Yet there are also killer types who hide their behavior (Bundy was infamous for this as his girlfriends had zero idea what he was doing) and compartmentalize their lives in ways that are stunning to the rest of us who are not sociopaths and/or pathological liars. GSK (Joseph D’Angelo) never appeared in any files on the many murder cases in which he was responsible, his police coworkers never picked up “bad vibes” from him, and he seemed to be a basic if prone to stupid flare-ups in anger at neighbors etc. grandfather type.
I think Jules Thomas suffers from post-traumatic brain-injury , due to all those beatings from Ian Bailey. She’s the victim of coersive control and senere abuse. She in my opnion, is the accomplish. She covered up for Ian Bailey and now Jules Thomas is covering up for herself.
Thiz is a disgusting comment - Ian was set up and wrongfully framed for a crime he did not commit!
@@freedomunltd You dont know that.
Thank you!
I’m sorry I missed the live today because I have so many questions pertaining to this situation. When someone is guilty, it seems they’ll forever have two personalities, but still have only their one language bank to draw from. Can you differentiate between which personality they’re putting forth by how they use their words, so you can tell which “person” you’re talking to at the moment, or is their structural use of language the same? As a human, is it generally harder to lie by giving a false, definitive “I didn’t kill Sophie” than it is committing a heinous act? Is statement analysis of suspects words over the years prioritized for clues in cold cases? The current Idaho 4 case is an example where the suspect has yet to publicly say “I didn’t kill them.” Is analysis of his current recorded correspondence from jail being scrutinized for his use of language for embedded clues, or does the gag order inhibit that?
Peter- Would you consider doing a statement analysis of Wendi Adelson (her interview with police right after her ex-husband’s murder)?
Send transcript to hyattanalysis at g mail dot com
His disingenuous sympathy is congruous with his distancing language 😁Love it Peter, great video thank you
His sympathy was genuine! Ian was damned if he did say anything sympathetic and damned even if he did not! What is being said is reprehensible nonsense!
I really think he liked to play everyone. He was a highly intelligent man and he also studied law after this murder and sued the state over his treatment as a suspect. I think he is playing with the law and the police and the locals with a lot of this.
Is it possible to access the team’s analysis on the Case?
@PeterHyatt Have you done an analysis on the statements of Stephan Sterns and Jennifer Soto?
He pretty much never said Sophie's name. His entire life was about becoming someone he wasn't. Trying to overcome a deep inadequacy. An affected accent, the outlandish clothes, hats, a huge staff, calling himself a poet. He thought he was superior and could outwit everyone. Chasing the limelight no matter what. A machiavellian narcissist- most if not everything he said was disingenuous, hiding in plain sight behind a veil of pretentiousness. May Sophie's beautiful spirit rise in freedom.
None of which means he murdered anyone.
@@fredbloggs545
Bailey knew about the murder too early according to three locals.
Bailey went immediately to Sophie’s house because a “foreign national” had been murdered near Schull, an area full of foreigners.
Bailey had a history of brutal violence towards women.
Bailey had a big fire behind his house, burning clothes at the time.
Bailey had noticeable scratches on his face and hands at the time.
Bailey happened to go wandering for a few hours on the night of the murder.
Bailey told several people he had done it afterwards. Add that into a ton more indicators his malignant narcissism and more besides. I know who I believe did it. The French courts also knew.
@@lululiga333
"Bailey knew about the murder too early according to three locals."
No he didn't. A friend of her neighbour Alfie knew that it was Sophie before noon. That friend lives miles away in Cork City! Alfie and Shirley had a telephone, within minutes they would have been phoning their friends and family. The local priest and local doctor who attended within the hour would have been informing all they knew too. By 11-12 noon the whole village would know, because they all have telephones. Quite why you people insist on this nobody knowing anything nonsense is puzzling to me, it's like you don't know how gossip works in a small town and you think telephones didn't exist.
"Bailey went immediately to Sophie’s house because a “foreign national” had been murdered near Schull, an area full of foreigners"
Bailey claims that Eddie Cassidy mentioned she was French in the phone call he made to him. Cassidy denies this, however he is an unreliable witness as he also made claims about the timings of calls he made to others, which police found to be wrong. Cassidy claimed for example that he had not phoned somebody, when records showed that he had, three times. He is clearly not reliable, so when he claims he did not mention her being French to Bailey, that should be questioned. Bailey knew that Sophie lived at the cottage because he was friends with her neighbour Alfie. Not hard to figure out why he would first try there since it was close-by.
"Bailey had a history of brutal violence towards women."
No he does not, his violence has been limited to his relationship with Jules. He has no history of violence against "women", it is woman. His ex-wife stated that he did not hit her. Those who are involve with domestic violence don't generally go on to murder a complete stranger. If they did, then many men in Ireland would be suspects to her murder. I note you failed to mention Karl Heinz Wolney who was a drunken, violent, wife-beater. He lived closer to Sophie and was in town the night she was in town that day. He had no alibi and committed suicide two months later allegedly saying that he had done something terrible.
"Bailey had a big fire behind his house, burning clothes at the time."
No he didn't. Jules stated that she emptied out her studio house (not their home) burning items, such as a mattress. She said this was November. Police stated that they found nothing of interest in the remains of the bonfire.
"Bailey had noticeable scratches on his face and hands at the time."
He did, we know this because Jules' daughters gave statements in support of Bailey saying that the scratches were there before the murder!
"Bailey happened to go wandering for a few hours on the night of the murder."
Bailey stated that he got up to write an article that had a deadline. He wrote it in the kitchen then went to the studio house 300 yards away to where he typed it. Jules found the article on the kitchen table the next morning. The paper confirmed that he had submitted the article and that they published it. Jules said that he often left the bed to write.
"Bailey told several people he had done it afterwards. "
He was using sarcasm in the face of ridiculous accusations being put to him. The DPP report makes this clear and when you read the context you will understand why. You have actually read the DPP report, yes? As it appears not from the nonsense you have written.
"The French courts also knew."
That will be the French court that used Marie Farrell's LIE that she admitted was lies, yes? You think it acceptable that a person should be convicted of murder in a court that KNEW they were using lies? Is that acceptable to you, is it?
Doesn't mean he did it? Where was the evidence it's just hearsay? He may have been a real horrible person but was he there at the bridge that night or not? It was never proven he was wandering about that night? They also said he was writing the article in the cottage. It came down to the sighting that Marie Farrell later redacted and ran away from the trial.What about Marie Farrells alibi and the man in the car? Or what about Alfie Lyons alibi?
Most people's evidence of Bailey comes from documentaries and Netflix which was completely biased. Bailey met the description of the murderer. There was no evidence he walked the four miles that night in the dark after drink to find out if Sophie was there. He knew he had to write the article to get paid. The more I think about this case anyone could of been the murderer included her neighbours who obviously used each other as alibis. Also why did Marie Farrell never reveal the person she was with that night in public? She and her lover or partner could of been the murderer. What were they really doing near the bridge? Did she really see Bailey and that prompted her to make the call? Why didn't Sophie call someone in the house if she was been attacked? Why didn't see pick up her keys and drive away? Why did she lace up her boots and put on her dressing gown and go to the bottom of the gate? Was she been chased? Why didnt ring her neighbours? Look at the distance from the house to the bottom of the gate. Why did the husband specifically ring at midnight? Why did someone use a concrete block it's almost like they didn't want her to be recognised anymore? Why would Sophie have two separate glasses of wine built up on the draining board? Did she wash them or someone else? Why did she have a breakfast or when did she digest the food? Was it from the previous day? Did she have someone staying over with her? Why didn't her neighbours hear her screaming? There was way more to the story than just Bailey.
Sophie's story is so fascinating (beyond the horrific way she died).
I was suspicious of her husband, and the sighting of a frenchman in the area who may have been despatched...to despatch Sophie.
Ive sometimes felt that the Journalist was purposefully putting doubt as tonhis innocence. He spent a lot of time in court, and now cant return home.
Cant wait to hear what you have to say, Peter
That’s how I have felt too but also interested in the the German national who lived one mile from Sophie, who disappeared back to Germany shortly after Sophie’s death, then committing suicide after confessing to a friend that he had ‘done a terrible thing’.
Who sighted the French man in the area though? I thought it was Marie Farrel..
Yes it was Marie Farrell who said she saw someone outside he to shop watching Sophie who was dressed like a french man. Then she claimed she saw someone at the bridge washing his boots. Then she said it was Bailey then she said it wasn't crazy stuff that delayed and swayed the whole narrative of the events of Sophie's death. No body ever mentions the taping of the police station in Pantry. Regardless of Ian's behaviour or demeanor they were out to get Bailey anyway. Loads of evidence went missing in the case.
@olearymiriam well I rest my case. If the sighting was by Marie Farrel then it can't be taken as truthful as she's a known lier. I wonder did she ever see anyone 🤔. The night of the murder, or outside her shop or any other time.
I suspected her husband too (maybe not he personally but set it up) as he didn't bother to come and take his beautiful wife back home to France. Left her lying there over Christmas. Poor Sophie. May she rest in peace.
Hello mr Hyatt.
I recently found out about you;
You are amazing and thank you for your knowledge and sharing🙏🏼
I have a question;
Do you know the Netflix series ‘making a murderer.’
Would you look into the story.
It’s so sad.
It’s years ago I watched it and to know that nobody knows if innocent people are in jail….
I really would love to hear your words and thoughts about it
Because it seems nobody want to burn their fingers on the case
Wishing you all best and maintains of health.
😊🍀☀️
IF he was such a sensitive soul (that he could let the family have the solace of thinking of him as the killer) why was he not sensitive to the possible future victims of another attack by the ‘REAL’ killer. One would think it would be important to him that no other person becomes a victim of this unknown killer!!!
Because it wad not random.. she was a Hit.
@@HumanimalChannel I’m not familiar with the case. I’m just going by what I’m seeing in the language…and his ‘sensitive nature’ doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.
Ian was franed by the Gardai in order to protect the real perpetrator
@@HumanimalChannel Ian was framed by the Gardai in order to protect the real perpetrator
I would be interested to hear your analysis of the letter in the Kay Wenal murder case.
Oh! I just realised, Ian Bailey died a few days ago! RIP IAN BAILEY
@@007nadineL
Brutal killer, yet the DPP who saw all the evidence refused to even charge him, TWICE.
Do you have evidence that the experienced Barristers at the DPP have not?
@@007nadineLReally this is judgmental nonsense
Thank you Peter, great analysis of the suspect's words showing his guilt.
He was insuffereable to listen to and I found him repulsive to look at ( on video ) even if there had never been a murder and if he hadn't been the suspect.
It was annoying to hear him say in every interview that he "knew"that he had "nothing to do with it" in that old maiden aunt voice of his beneath his pretentious posh accent.
So you are saying he is guilty because you don't like his personality.
I hope you never serve on a jury.
@@fredbloggs545
Obviously if I was on a jury I couldn't base my decision going by Statement Analysis or even from hearing the underlying truth beneath the accused person's words because jurors have to provide reasons based on facts to the other jurors for their decision. In that particular case there was so much factual common sense evidence that it's strange that he wasn't brought to Trial.
Apart from that, no one says that they "know" they didn't do something as serious as murdering someone and to say it about less important things actually suggests a lack of certainty.
He even denied his guilt in some interviews by saying:
"You know you had nothing to do with it."
Then there's the
"nothing to do with it" that he always said instead of saying
"I didn't kill her", this suggests that either blamed Sophie for his crazy, drink fuelled attack on her or blamed alcohol or believed that he was possessed.
He blamed Jules and drink for him battering her and putting her in hospital as well as tearing clumps of hair from her head.
He would have given up drink after that appalling crime if he had taken responsibility and been sorry.
He even blamed his baby sister for the downturn his life took after her birth when he was around seven because he claimed that she too used to lie about him to their parents about him having hurt her.
Babies and small children don't cry and lie about older siblings hurting them.
@@elliegreen4738
What FACTUAL evidence is there exactly?
@@JackBurton-qp4hc
You are as aware of the large amount of factual evidence as I am.
@@elliegreen4738
Are you going to answer the question?
Please analyze Madeline Soto’s mother. There’s so much going on in some of interview footage with her boyfriend lurking in the background. It’s wild.
Amazing analysis Peter… What amazing work you do.. It’s so detailed, precise and analytical. You scientifically and linguistically explain what we feel energetically but haven’t got the words! If that makes sense!
I feel
Certain that the work you and your network are doing ,will be in even more demand due to this crazy era of mass communication manipulation. You guys are light workers. 🧖🏼♂️🧖🏼♂️🧖🏼♂️🧖🏼♂️ thanks for sharing your knowledge…
I listened to some longer recent interviews he gave, and, there is something so disconcerting in that way he speaks, the tone, the very relax3d style at times, but also a very STUDIED way about him, and of course after a long time he has a lot of answers ready. He knows people knpw how vile he has been tomwomen esp his long term relationship but acts as if things just ran their course and the pressure damaged the relationship -rather than his actions. He must be quite practised in persuasion, and manipulation . Is his Harrow schoolboy accent real? I do doubt it.
"MAGNANIMOUS " yes!
Im still listening to the video.
And he is oh so forgiving of Marie, he has forgiven her because she has now told the truth.....
Well sais
I've been hoping and waiting for you to do this. His former partner Jules Thomas was asked after his death how she felt. She said she didn't really feel much and now cannot see what she saw in him. But she is still steadfast that Ian did not kill Sophie. I had hoped she would tell the truth. However she did say she is currently writing a book. I really hope she finally tells what she knows.
Thank you Peter. Love your videos.
"I had hoped she would tell the truth."
Why have you not considered that she is telling the truth? Your bias is obvious and you are another disgusting individual accusing Jules without any evidence.
And you are? Condescension and offensive language , demonstrates that you cant tolerate a different perspective.
I think Jules Thomas suffered from Post-traumatic brain-injury , due to several beatings from Ian Bailey and years of coersive control. Jules Thomas is the accomplish. She covered up for Ian Bailey and now, she ‘s covering up for herself. IF she tells the truth - the Courts Will show leniance.
I totally agree with you. She was beaten to a pulp on several occasions that we know of for sure, plus the years and years of being worn down by a controlling narcissist. Amazing she even had the strength to get him out of her life. But she did it. I really do hope she comes clean now. Sophie's family deserve that much. @@acb5245
@@acb5245
You people are disgusting, accusing Jules.
Love your work Mr. Hyatt! There's a case I'd be interested in hearing your analysis on. Ladonna Batty, nurse vacationing in the Bahamas gets raped on a beach with her friend. I apologize I don't have a link but something she said in the article I read seemed strange.
In case you'd like to buy a copy, here is the title Peter references:
The Mind of Adolf Hitler The Secret Wartime Report by W C Langer
I live in Ireland and whilst you do some interesting analysis and I like your work, you don't have the granularity of detail and missed key evidence in this instance - in short you have misread the core case. He was the local oddball and prone to domestic violence, but it is extremely unlikely he killed her due to simple logistics, but he stood out especially as coincidentally he was the stringer who was called to cover the murder by big newspapers. He made matters worse for himself by becoming flattered that he was considered a murder suspect and when drunk used to hint he did it just to try to 'impress' people.
Nonetheless, the lack of clear evidence (any evidence) is why the DPP, your DA, refused to prosecute him and dismantled the 'evidence' the police tried to use. The reality was the police decided he did it and then went looking for evidence, even pressurising a woman to claim she saw him in a vital location; she was having an affair. Subsequently she withdrew the testimony. To this day whilst the 'man in the street' believes he did it, serious journalists, state lawyers and the upper echelons of the police believe there was no case against him. Bailey subsequently graduated with a law degree and tried to sue various papers who implied he did it; unfortunately because he was an odious individual who had boasted that he did do it, he lost the case.
Our Attorney General, same as yours, came to the same conclusion and along with the Supreme Court refused to extradite him to France, for the simple reason was that all the French did was take the tainted Irish police evidence and use that to convict him without any defence offered by him. Thus we had the bizarre legal situation that Ireland refused to prosecute him, the courts refused to send him to France, but the French convicted him on disproven evidence from the Irish Police which Ireland itself had dismissed. Even worse, the European Arrest Warrant meant he could not leave Ireland and travel to any European country, even his home country of the UK. He could not visit his ill mother before she died or attend the funeral.
What we learn from this case is the integrity of the Irish judicial system in that it refused to go along with a Lynch mob who wanted to 'string up' the local weirdo.
Yeah, rhe French "trial" is an embarasament! Utrerly ludkcrous. Wouldn't like to be accused of stealing a baguette in france!
They showed their utter bias and that it was a "witchhunt".
There should be some way they should have to have their own ruling stand up in some sort of international review courr!!! The way theybran that case would ve dismantled as fiction immediately.
Sophie's marriage was over and there was pride and a lot of money at stake
That may all be true but my understanding is that Peter does statement analysis only. He doesn’t (as I understand it) look at evidence or the lack thereof. His specialty is using the words of people, and only their words, to assess guilt or whatever he is tasked with looking for. This is his analysis based on the man’s own words. The rest is irrelevant to the matter at hand, analysing his words.
@@Lollipop_Lexi Took the words rights out of my mouth. This is about statement analysis - analysing Ian Bailey's words, and not about police evidence or incompetence etc.
Watch 30:56 to 31:23 and that's exactly what he does, ending with 'here's your killer' or 'he's your killer'. The entire analysis is premised on Bailey being the killer and when Mr. Hyatt says there was no denial of the police evidence or no rebuke of it, that's also simply factually incorrect. The Irish equivalent of the District Attorney and the Attorney General of the country systematically dismantled and rebuked the evidence of his guilt and the Supreme Court refused to extradite on these grounds. Bailey himself went to court to sue for defamation over it, that sounds like a denial or rebuking to me. Bailey was an oddball, a weirdo and 'wife' beater and an narcissist, but not a killer. It was a case of 'round up the usual suspects' And if he is not guilty, then the statement analysis which points towards his guilt is wrong. @@Lollipop_Lexi
I have always thought, that irrespective of whether he did it or not, he is the sort of character who would ' get away with it'. He was a Fleet Street crime journalist who was forensically aware. There was no evidence against him that would sustain a conviction of murder in a common law jurisdiction. The conviction in France (prove you didn’t do it) is scary … the crime was not committed in France … The French police did not carry out the investigation … the defendant was not before the court … the defendant was not represented in court … a single sided prosecution with no rebuttal and what verdict do you expect?
Peter, would you consider doing Wendi Adelson regarding the murder of her ex Dan Markel? Thanks so much
I believed it was him from day one. This just further confirms it for me. He’s so obviously a malignant narcissist/psychopath. Notorious liars manipulators and violent. His ex was under his spell and control like many abused women. I read that she finally left him and that her daughters despise him. I bet Jules knew more but was afraid to admit it. Such a pity he died without paying for her murder. Such a miscarriage of justice for her family. At least they know now that he’s wandering around free getting drunk and poking at them with disgusting statements. Hopefully they will feel further peace and closure now.
@lululiga333
"and that her daughters despise him"
Since Jules' daughters gave supporting statements that Bailey's scratches were present before the murder, the fact that they "despise him" means that they are being truthful and he did indeed have scratches before the murder.
If Jules, "knew more", then her daughters would also have to know more and be involved as they gave those supporting statements, despite hating the guy.
Why would people who you say "despise him", give such supporting statements unless those statements were actually true? Which then blows a hole in the police theory that the scratches were from the murder.
Are you getting all your nonsense from Netflix?
Well?
Fortunately the legal professionals who saw all the evidence refused to charge him on two occasions. When even the prosecution say the evidence is just not there, you should be listening to them. Of course they aren't getting their belief from watching Netflix though!
Would you consider an analysis of the Tucker Carlson/ Putin interview? My apologies if I’m posting this in the wrong place.
If Bailey was guilty why was he never convincted
He was convicted but in France. Apparently the gaurds felt they didn't have enough evidence, the French police say they had enough. He just didn't do any prison time.
He wasn't guilty, the corrupt garda tried to set him up but they couldn't, if he was guilty they would have found something. Your man in this video is full of shite 😂
@@Victoria12339
He was convicted in France due to the French court knowingly using Marie Farrell's lie that she had witnessed him near the scene. They knew it was a lie as she admitted it was a lie, yet still used it. That's how corrupt the French system is.
Apparently there was no evidence that Bailey did it (with regards to DNA) and the Guards lost a large farm gate that had blood on it.
@@StepbyStepbyMiriam
There was no evidence at all, never mind just DNA.
Thank you, Peter Hyatt.
Absolute inciorrect and deeply biased analysis bu Peter - Ian was set up for this crime, deliberately so in order to protect the true criminal which was one of their own (a Garda).
Another crushing insight
Is that a joke? Ian was framed for this crime by a corrupt system
oh ian bailey died?
Yes. A heart attack, while out walking a street. He had had so.many heartattacks, it was just a matter of time
Yep delight💕
Have you ever done the Jeremy bamber case? I no it's a long time ago but plenty of footage to analyse and witnesses etc, and new appeal ment to be in the works, lots of people think he is innocent and plenty think guilty, Would love to no what you think about the case.
Thanks, Peter Hyatt. Brilliant as allways 👍
Nothing brilliant about a deeply prejudiced analysis
Can you analyse statements from Shrien Dewani? He’s the husband of Ani Dewani who was murdered in her honeymoon in southafrica
I dont believe ian did it, people commenting about this case forget the local police tried everything to pick theforeigner who liked to stand out and was a bit of a narcissist. No evidence and uaed witness statements that were given free phones by police and one local lady that was a liar that took her statement back about seeing a man that looked like brady on a road nearby. Crime scene was completely ruined and everyone stillsays this guy drunkenly stumbled a mile across fields and was so angry that a woman turned him down that he used a cement block to cave her head in. Thats why the irish wouldn't force bailey to trial in france because french trial was using already debunked evidence from terrible local police investigation.
And yes ian beat his girlfriend and wasn't a very nice guy but pretending thats enough to blame him for brutal murder is bs
Ps_french trial was a farce. Nothing ever mentioned about her french husband at the time who didn't go with her to Ireland and never even came over after this type killing felt personal and a hitman isn't rediculous
I am from cork
And it was probably a Frenchman who killed Sophie . Het marruage was over, and she was conducting affairs at the cottage. She didnt want to spend Christmas in france. And maybe knew her husband might try something becaus3 she didnt want to go alone.
Ian was an easy target/scapegoat..
Esp with his questionable background with his relationships. Id thought he like make people not be sure about him, but its hard to decide whats true.
About to listen to Petrr's analysis, cant wait!
@@dougalmaguire2357 Because cases where a man beat someone else to death in a fit of rage have never happened before ?
Absentia, not Abstentia. Cheers.
I have a question re this case. Why a w itness whom claimed to have seen a person on the night the lady was murdered at a bridge near the village and not too far from the scene was allowed to run from a court house .and also change her story from the original story .. i mean if a person runs from a court house that surely is contempt . but nothing was done .. and still this person has never cleared up whom she was with that night and what exactly she saw at this very rural part of Irl. where strangers really stand out . and what she saw or who she saw . was not a stranger .
I believe Bailey was totally innocent and he was used as a scapegoat absolutely anybody could have killed Sophie
correct
Very poor police work, lots of high emotions in a small community, every knows everyone and no-one is going to say, the casework was seriously substandard, and all the emotions stay high and get redirected.
I do not know if he was innocent. The police work was seriously sub standard. In law a person has the right of presumed innocence and he did experience bullying and harassment. The local closed community mentality needs be examined in terms of what fuel the ongoing narrative. Yes he was a creep, an abusive partner, well able to use the system as it exists to his benefit, for e.g. law degree. He courted publicity, made horrible comments, did not seem to have any redeeming personal qualities. He was an outsider, no relations in this rural area and made no positive contribution to his community. All of this is absolutely true. However the law is the law and then we can consider civics, ethics and morality. The behaviour of each person is their responsibility, unless medically impaired. This is something that needs reflection as West Cork is not shining here.
You also have to remember at the time the police stations were being taped. They were corrupt as hell. They needed someone quick to be the scapegoats as they botched the forensics because it took ages for the pathologist to come down they would of been quicker flying the person in from London the getting someone from Dublin. He may have been an abnoxious, attention seeking man but where is the real evidence he killed her. It could of been the neighbours, the people up at the bridge, local people in the area other than Bailey, a drug gang she uncovered, someone stealing or trying to break into the house. Marie Farrells statements didn't help. They had it in for Bailey and they ruined his life. Anyone could of been there that night including those who all gave their alibis they all could of been lying.
I dont like the look of sophey husband he was a director of this murder i think he had alot to gain married guite soon after sophey murder not much love their
He had a huge insurance payout and there were meant to be several affairs on both sides, allegedly
@@freedomunltd
Daniel had a child with his then lover only a year after Sophie's death. Yeah he was that "devasted" by her death! 🙂
👋👋👋😄😄😄
I'm from cork and this murder transfixed the nation ever since..the police did a very bad job on this case but the way I look at it is either Bailey was innocent and perversely loved the attention that people thought he did or he did it and loved the attention...either was he was a narcissistic man, who I feel 80% sure killed her...in the Netflix doc the timeline that he knew things hours before the murder had even been reported was the most daming
The Netflix one that had Sophie's, cousin as a producer and the full support of the family and Guards? Where it had the senior detective inferring that Bailey's coat was burned, when in fact it was taken as evidence and cut for samples and he knew it was? It did not challenge that senior officers blatant lie?
The timeline that did not mention people in Cork city knowing before noon that it was Sophie that had been murdered, because Alfie and Shirley had an amazing device called a telephone and would have called the whole town by 10.30am!
Of course the documentary also failed to point out that Bailey got much of his speculation wrong and that other news sources reported aspects of the case before he did.
How about when it showed the person who stayed with Jules and Ian stating that she had seen a coat in a bucket, when in fact she was lying, her statement at the time said clothes in the bath? Again she was not challenged and I wonder why?
How about somebody conveniently "remembering" *19 YEARS* later that Sophie had spoken about Bailey on the telephone?
Yeah totally reliable and unbiased documentary produced by Sophie's cousin that was.... 🙂
Have a search for this exact term and read what the prosecution thought of their own police investigation. It may shock you like it did me after I was conned by Netflix. They refused to even charge him, twice! I was left astounded that I had watched something so blatanty biased.
Sophie Toscan Du Plantier DPP File 2001 pdfcoffee
Well said.i agree with what you said
Yes, the police did a very bad job. Still there is room for redemption and that is something for Sophie. If the police study in a very detailed way even minute police step. If they look at what was done correctly and what was done incorrectly, that is 100% by the book and then formulate a detailed training from all of this. The mistakes, the not doing the Mr Ploddy 100% by the book can bring down an entire case.
They can then look in detail at the cases where correct procedures were upheld and the outcome. It is tough work. There are two parts one crime scenes and physical evidence, this is where a garda of a lower rank can be working and ever rule he knows and maintains to the law is really important. It is also emotional, it is horrible, it could be local, it could be anytime of the day or night. All the senior
staff could be busy or else where or a garda could come upon a scene, this happens for e.g 999 calls and domestic violence. Or 999 call, tip off and children left unsupervised and neglected. So then need to be calm, sharp and emotionally controlled is huge and to follow all procedures with writing and maintaining evidence. The detectives investigate and interview, they also need alertness , emotional calm, following procedures and write ups.
Cases that have been hugely helped by good and thorough police work should also be examined in detail on this case.
About 45 years ago. A woman in Kildare went missing, near Christmas on her way home from work. I was very young at the time, and frequently exposed to “ The news on the black and white television, with a shush..”.
I clearly remember the pictures on the news. It was probably thirty years later when the case was solved. I remember feeling like wanting to write to the police.
The case was solved on dna evidence. Not available at the time. The garda who collected the sample from the boot of a man’s car- the car had been cleaned and smelled of bleach. He said milk had gotten spilled and went sour.
The evidence was stored 100% by all rules of evidence in the Kildare police station a new station was built and this Garda made sure to transfer the sample following 100% % of the rules, just before he retired . The defence team used as an argument the age of the sample and the fact it was moved. That was all they had, that is how tightly they looked for a loophole. They found none. The suspect was found guilty of the rape and murder of Phylis Murphy RIP. He committed this horrible crime at a time when his wife was in hospital giving birth to another of his children.
Another case Marylyn Rynn. RIP Marylyn was raped and murdered minutes from her home. She took the night link late bus home from a city centre Christmas Party and took a short cut through the local park in suburban Dublin. Her body was discovered in the bushes. The police investigated stretched to include interviewing a very wide range of men. Her co workers were asked if she ever met a male known to them. My then boyfriend and I happened to have been at the same party several months earlier. Her co worker was his friend and he was interviewed. The detective mat him over a coffee and asked questions. The listened closely to all interviews and took careful notes. One man had said something small that as they went back through their notes was different to other people. They re interviewed him and continued. The police on the scene of discovery followed all rules carefully and forensic materials were collected and all evidence managed well. She was dead for dome time and a sudden cold snap preserved DNA evidence. Her murderer was convicted.
Most recently, the convicted murderer of Elaine O’Hara RIP, has appealed for a mistral due to the use of phone evidence and some part of the law- he is a horrific, brazen individual. He never thought he would be caught. He threw a phone and her keys and bag into a reservoir several miles and the opposite direction to where her body was found. Fate intervened as a heat wave the following Summer and the reservoir was unusually dry. That would have been unless without the diligence of a local garda in the village station. Guys fishing called him, they found the bag. He responded and then did what he called a fingertip search of the area- through the mucky water, he found the keys and the phone. He said he returned to the station put them in the drying room and entered all the evidence, details in the book and labelled each item.
There is a team dedicated to looking for a number of missing Irish women. No bodies, no evidence. All this needs be used in detailed and thorough ways for training. It’s time to move away from the high emotions and Bailey was a creep but there was no for charging him. Another case 59 years old the disappearance of Mary Boyle age 7 in rural Donegal, believed dead and the perpetrator known. Gemma Doherty journalist did good work making a documentary on this and then ruined it through ego. She was advised by the solicitor of the documentary team and the solicitor of Justice for Mary Boyle to not say certain words and a name, this could have the potential to jeopardise any future legal action. Big ego- she went ahead and said it. In a democracy we have laws and the roles, rules and responsibilities must be upheld. That will always need additional training and inservice training for police. So it will be a way to bring some honour to Sophie and her family if the police use their worst out of this to create proper future pathways without scapegoating any individual.
Du plant te a
Thank you.