Lawyer Reacts: Depp v Heard Trial Week 3 Recap & CONFIRMED Amber Heard Will Testify Next Week
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 апр 2022
- Join Peter Tragos for this week's episode of Case By Case where he will break down week 3 of the Johnny Depp v Amber Heard trial. Amber Heard has been confirmed to testify in week 4 of the trial.
#AmberHeard #DeppVHeard #JohnnyDepp
🔴 Do you or someone you know need to speak to a real lawyer about a case? Or do you find yourself needing legal advice? Please reach out to our firm and we will make sure to answer your questions or find someone who can. Our consultations are always free and confidential. You can call our firm at (727)441-9030 or email us at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com.
✅ For business inquiries contact me at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com
✅ Let's connect: www.tragoslaw.com/
Twitter - @tragoslaw
Instagram - /tragoslaw
Facebook - /tragoslaw
TikTok - /tragoslaw
✅ Join our email list here - bit.ly/33lV3Mb
Get your Lawyer You Know merch here - bit.ly/LYKMerch
🔴 NOT LEGAL ADVICE 
Развлечения
As a "regular person" that's been a juror a couple of times, whenever an opposing lawyer aggressively tries to prevent a witness from answering a question, like they did with Mr. White, it tells me they're trying to hide something, rather than actually wanting to get at the truth. And it makes me distrust them from that point forward and automatically believe the other side.
Interesting! Thanks for your input. I feel the same but not been a juror. I understand that the defense has a job to prove their case but when you're attacking every witness and snippets of evidence to me you are hiding truths. 🤔
Oh wow, I've never been to one, but it sounds fascinating. If you were a jury in this case, who would you side with at this point?
Exactly
I live in a small town, so fewer people means you get tagged for jury duty a lot more often. What I find with jurors is that they want to take into account things the defendant didn't present in court. As a juror, you can't do that.
I don’t feel like Ed White was too biased, I felt he was righteously outraged that his client was getting hosed by his wife/ex-wife financially.
@@malco9504 lawyers are supposed to be biased towards their clients... they're being paid to represent them.
What some people call bias other people call loyalty, and as long as the business manager testified truthfully, that's all that matters.
He gets paid good money to protect JDs money and seems to have worked hard at figuring out how to keeps JD above water then a ???? Decides they are entitled to 14.5 mil after 15 months… White seemed to have the best interest of his client at heart.
@@mandyinseattle amen, hallelujah 🙌
Exactly!! The amount of money she demanded for little over a years marriage should be a crime on its own??
If he was violent there would be plenty of evidence of it?
The fact that theirs not a single photo or person that saw any injuries??
This is just so obvious it just didn’t happen!
I fought a similar case had a stack of evidence Drs reports ect,but was still hard, how this ever got this far I can’t imagine????
CPA was passionate about looking out for his client (Johnny)'s interests. Mr. White came across as legitimately appalled at demands of AH
What strikes me the most is all of the witnesses that have worked for Johnny for so many years. He doesn’t seem to have turnover in his staff and that speaks volumes to me. The Scottish bodyguard cleared all of the others of my biggest skepticism of none of them seeing Johnny doing drugs. Not seeing him do drugs seemed like bull as they kept hammering how much of an addict he was. It didn’t align. The Scottish bodyguard saying he always suspected, but didn’t see it made all the other testimony ring more true. To my original point, the fact that all of these people stick around and continue to stick around speaks volumes for Johnny. Regardless of the pay you don’t keep an employee for 15 or 20 years if you are a jerk or in any way abusive. I would recommend his lawyers casually note that to the jury.
Having listened to the doctors etc. I'm not so sold on his being a junky. Apart from the opiod he seemed to have everything under control until he met AH. Actually, their harping on makes me question what they're saying more. Also, what's with AH Munchausing she's plying him with alcahol, demanding he be given extra yum yums. As far as I can see, the only accusations of anything come from AH. Convieniently totally behind closed doors and outside of the hours of secret recording she was doing.
Absolutely! Great pint 👍
You are so right about everything you said. Also they should make a note of what a wonderful employer he is.
The fact that she recorded him secretly for hours upon hours, cherry picked the best of it and still doesn’t have any actual evidence that he abused her really says a lot imho.
Also, why is she withholding the meta data for the cabinet crashing video? I think it's because the date makes it clear what he was upset about and somehow supports his case... something to do with his previous business manager, I'd guess.
@@tmckmusic8584 Yes. In his testimony, he said it had nothing to do with her. Still she starts with( and sorry if this isn’t perfectly quoted) “ What happened. This morning you were so nice. “ Makes it sound like it was about her or about the two of them, which of course, is what she was going for.
Right and the texts! They had all of his texts and could only come up with some name calling, hyperbole / joking lingo, and “I hit a wall today” “amber and I hit a wall” 🤣🤣 they clearly don’t know the expression.
Well..how incredibable with all the recordings she made without his knowledge she had none whatsoever showing Johnny being an abuser?I wouldnt be surprised she doesnt show up on Monday.
@@tmckmusic8584 it was 2016, his mother had just died.
don't apologize for being excited that your channel is growing! progress should always be celebrated.
100% agree, it is your channel so you got to be having fun and worry less about those negative
💯💯 everybody talks about like & subscribe ... that's how you grow yr channel. Don't apologise to trolls. 😊😇
Agree🎉
Totally!
Heck yeah!!
Ed White appears to be the adult at the table. He was professional and Rottenborn looked worse than when he was badgering all the other witnesses.
No, the lawyer wouldn’t let him speak. It made the lawyer look like he was trying to hide something - prevent the witness from saying something important. The lawyer also came across as rude. All of AH’s lawyers are getting angry and their frustration is showing (the female especially). It’s not a good look, if I were a juror I would guess they are getting so frustrated because they know they are losing.
Agreed. JD was constantly turning to look at AH attorney as if he couldn’t believe the rudeness of him. Nor I. I thought Ed White was a polite chap and was trying to keep his answers short.
Agree. AH lawyers seem rude and sometimes ridiculous. (Trying to cut the witness off from explaining.)
Truth shouldn't be afraid of the light of day. Not always simple and straightforward but that's just all of us being human and in some cases honest and maybe in others more deceptive intentionally or otherwise
Consider what it's like taking instructions from, advising and representing someone with BPD and HPD.....
No, I disagree with you. Rottenborn was rude to a man from another generation, who has experienced life when humans were respectful to one another, even in court. For example he called him "counselor". There was a hearing loss issue as well. The judge handled this well. Rottenborn came off as a spoiled brat. The witness probably thought he needed a spanking.
Agree
Absolutely
This. I know if someone spoke to my grandfather like that, they would be nasty scum in my opinion and there's always the common belief of birds of feather, Ambers team seem as nasty as her.
Agree,don’t understand why Ambers lawyers are being so generally unpleasant/rude?
Don’t think this helps them at all when they want empathy for their client?
Maybe be slightly less aggressive towards witnesses, of course witnesses that are there for a certain side then they have a bias, you don’t need to tell jury this? They are perfectly aware of it,whether they believe or not is up to them not defence??
I think the defence were really over the top,we all know professional witnesses are paid, jury is aware of that!!!
I think Mr.White was just disgusted with Amber's greed and was indignant about his client being taken advantage of, not biased bc he liked Johnny personally.
The witness for the Aclu absolutely said the article about Johnny Depp. He 100% said his name.
He also seemed ashamed of some of the emails ACLU staff were writing about JD.
Ed White is someone i would definitely hire if I had uber millions. I felt he was trying to explain things in detail. Rottenborn was rude. Period. Her entire team is overly aggressive.
Aggressive is a tactic. Generally , it didn't seem to bother the Depp side
I agree 100%, Gypsy Soul. ✌
Rottenborn & Bredehoft are basically attacking witnesses, trying Everything to belittle them……tough to watch
@@mr_rn6549 But it bothers people around the world so it will probably bother jurors as well. It's all about jurors, people like us.
I liked White very much, he was literally enraged by the greed of Amber Heard and how she grabbed at Depp's money. Johnny is a pushover with money because he is NOT a greedy, money-obseesed person. He's truly a compassionate, ethereal, creative hippy who would rather smell the lilies in the field as he frolics and plays his 🎸 than count his millions of dollars. Mr. White will change all that - maybe.
No. He was annoyed because he couldn't finish clarifying his answer and it seemed as if Rottenborn was trying to skew the answers and the CPA wasn't having it.
I agree.
I also agree. I think he was frustrated because he kept getting cut off. Not because he was biased. I understand Johnny is an important client for him but he is a professional with many high value accounts and he seemed he was just feeling maybe a little disrespected by constantly being cut off.
Yup. Totally!
No respect on aturd lawyers. Point blank
@@mela2939 You said it perfectly! The CPA stated that he has many high powered clients and he is a professional so he expects to be treated in a professional manner.
My background is in criminal law, litigation strategy/storyline, profiling jurors, etc, I've also worked in Real Estate, Probate and family law...I do not think White came across as biased per say, but to me and my expert opinion, he came across more as defending his personal work and integrity against Rottenborn's cross, if that makes sense? I loved Malcom Connoly's testimony and even Starling's...I am also a DV with a 50 yr order for protection and have been diagnosed with complex PTSD as well, and I have written a book on PTSD dedicated to LEO's worldwide on how I have healed myself and then became a federal officer down in Florida in Fort Lauderdale...so my expert opinion on all of that is she doesn't have PTSD nor is she a victim. If you ever want my opinion let me know!!!
When he said that someone in jds team should have said Objection speculation
Jury should be equal male and female. Females read females better. The actress wi ll turn on the tears and the older fellas will fall for it.
@@juneterry8498 from what I heard, it is mostly made up of younger males in their 20's and a couple of females...either way, the jury would have been watching to see her reaction to Starling's answer and she smirked like she was happy she did it, instead of appearing remorseful. As far as them older fellas falling for it, I have profiled juries and in my experience male jurors tend to put themselves in the shoes of those at trial. In this case, JD as a victim and Amber as the defendant in order to feel because men have a hard time "feeling" for the most part. I think they would identify more with JD's experience and like I said, we've all seen the 'Mean Girls' and that's not going to sit well with them I do not think.
@@juneterry8498 when who said what?
If I wrote something public and later realized that it was hurting someone that I had never intended to hurt; I would make sure that I publicly let everyone know that it wasn't about that person.
@Sheryl kimball A narcissist generally wants to make themselves a victim because they really feel like a victim, as in the relationship herself. Ambers Behavior does trend to Borderline Personality Disorder. Meaning deep down she does not believe that she was abused, she believes Johnny is as chaotic as her , so she feels justified in her own mind to make allegations that she knows are false. I’ve worked in Mental Health. I have not personally interacted with her but her behavior is clearly appearing as all Borderline to me as it did the Psychologist. She did say Borderline and added Histrionic, but most borderlines tend to be histrionic.
@@crafty1096 She comes across to me as a narcissist or at least has NPD tendencies. Every time Johnny would try and talk to her she’d go off on a tangent twisting his words, talking over him making it all about her. Word salad. I’ve dealt with that and the yelling, screaming fits. Impossible to carry on a conversation with these people. It will drive a normal person insane, causing depression and eventually giving up altogether because you cannot come to an agreement. There is no working together to solve a problem. They are incapable of teamwork. They are insecure and that’s sad but no one can fix them nor do they believe they need help.
@@Tina-si1gz , Amen. Unfortunately I'm married to a narc and personally KNOW that you are exactly correct.
@@76482 “Personally know?” Unless you’re a psychologist or psychiatrist and have had a session it can’t be personal. Fact 1. She played Elon and James Franco off of Johnny Depp. She also made no effort to get extra money from Elon, he’s still simpimg for her. A Narcissist wouldn’t have let Elon go. She would have looked out for her personal financial needs. Instead the chaos of a love quartet was more important. After the restraining order, she wanted to meet Johnny. Did she use that to bust him? Nope. She just wanted his attention. The Chaos was more important than busting him to sue him to get more money. She wants money no doubt but she’s turned down opportunities to look out for herself to embrace a chaotic situation. That’s a Borderline not a narcissist. You personally know. Uh no you can’t. It’s not possible,
@@Tina-si1gz I broke it down to Shelby. She strings Elon and James Franco around and doesn’t use it to make money. Instead she used it to have a chaotic situation. When she contacted Johnny after the restraining order she could have set him up in so many ways. If it was narcissistic she would. Instead he was far away and she wanted to pull him close. Really what you and Shelby says lacks common sense if you know what both are. Talking over him? You know the main things about a Borderline are Chaos and control. Talking over him. Control. You speak in generalities as does Shelby I’ve given specific instances. She also made some kind of arrangement with the ACLU with money given by Elon. Pull them in close when they are far away and push them far away when you have them close. That’s a Borderline. Not a Narcissist. She had no actual reason to make any arrangements with the ACLU, yet she did. If it was Narcissistic she would have just said she had financial problems. There’s a reason why the Psychologist sees the same thing I do. Not what you and Shelby say. The yelling and screaming? The Psychologist says Histrionic along with borderline. They go together. Histrionic means essentially being melodramatic like screaming yelling. Again even General behaviors you mention match more with the Psychologist on the stand and me , but not you and Shelby. Show me a Narcissist that turns down money to make a situation Chaotic and gets their gratification from chaos. That’s Borderline.
I live in Toronto and the cable providers are listing more Johnny Depp movies now - Johnny's movies are really in demand
No. I do not think the CPA showed too much bias towards Johnny Depp. The CPA is hired to do a job and he was clear cut & factual about the transactions.
Somebody needs to check her Botox schedule and see if they align with her alleged facial ‘bruising’ schedule! Just saw a video over at Popcorn Planet with a neighbor talking about JD & AH.. videos of Franco in the elevator,AH pushing only one button for the penthouses. Supposed Franco lived in the building but he never did. She says it’s obvious he was let in by Amber for sleepovers while Johnny was away.
Yes and thay surely would cause bruising too.. or swelling.. I love popcorn planet they are in Las Vegas at the moment and stef the alter nerd 🤓
@@joannahampton5979 I would’t take the word of a plastic surgeon who has not actually treated Amber seriously. When I 1st saw my sister after years, I swore she had cheek implants but she only had Nova Threads. FYI, I’m totally team Johnny.
I'm so glad the bottom was brought up, I heard that on popcorned planet as well. I hope Johnny's side has investigated this!
ROTTENborn and Dingbat Ornery Cat Muffin Granny, Are Not Even Worth $100.00 Bucks an Hour, Together!
Watch Aquaman Star Jason Momoa's RUclips Video Reaction, to Johnny vs AHNarcissist Trial's #MePOO 💩🛏️. "She Will No Longer Be Known As Amber Heard, She's AmberTURD!" ~Jason Momoa Laughed🤣 ruclips.net/video/qv1h44nUUPO/видео.html
#AmberTURDBelongsInPrison
#JUSTICEforJOHNNY
I saw that do you think Johnny's lawyers or team will see it !!?
Ed White didn’t seem biased to me but I think he was really upset at the sheer amount of money being wasted. Amber wanting 14M tax free was really offensive to him and what it would cost his client. He does after all work for Johnny.
Ed White was my favorite. He didn't seem biased, but he was annoyed by Rottenborn. He was cutting him off constantly.
Heard's team is consistently rude and their behavior has been off-putting to all the witnesses.
I think Ed white was showing bias but who wouldn’t?! He personally saw firsthand Johnny being taken advantage of in a huge gross disgusting way financially and he knows how nice and generous depp is…I get he shouldn’t have been so obvious about it but to be honest I would act the same way
I agree, he was very protective as well he should. IMO
That’s what I think, so the poll was surprising to me. I think after seeing things for what they are and how much she took advantage of him, how could he not have bias? It’s only human.
It's not good to be bias Infront of jurors. Period
Johnny Depp leaves himself wide open to be taken advantage of financially. He doesn't seem to care that much about money
I have followed the trial live since the start and of course do not know Johnny or Amber but I get the impression that Johnny is honest as he has chosen to take this to court and expose his life to the public. My perception of it all is that he will emerge victorious from this as I perceive him as genuinely honest and credible. He actually has nothing more to lose.
I actually didn’t know Amber and was on her side when I would hear bits and pieces of this in the news until I started listening to the trial and I had to look at my own self to how I’m so quick to assume the man is the guilty one
Correct after the narcissist same as smear campaign sometimes one has nothing else to lose.
@@lisalancework7999
Anybody who didn't know right away what was going on please study narcissism because this shows you haven't been a victim of it before and you're not aware of what narcissism is but that could make you a Target.
Pls Check out the teachings of Professor Sam Vaknin -there is no better to learn from because he is a narcissist having the IQ of Albert Einstein.
@@selfesteem3447 I will actually look at that although I don’t think I have been a victim of it I do have a family member that I think is the victim of a possible narcissist
Peter I’m so glad you gave that gentle PSA about rude people in the chat. I was fuming when you were repeating what some people were saying. I kept thinking if they go too far you’ll be done. Maybe get a few mods to weed out the riff raff. I had to block a few trolls myself. PS I’m total type A as well and addicted to caffeine so sometimes I just switch off the chat instead of blowing a gasket. You’re awesome and so glad your wife is supportive. Thank you for all you do for us.
I was proud of Ed White for standing up for himself and his client especially after he saw how much Johnny had been drug through the mud in the past years.. Rottenboy is a rude ass bully, in my opinion.. Also, Ed White didn't want his words being twisted because of his past and or current witness testimonials
Ben Chew deserves it. He seems to actually care for Johnny plus is doing a great job.
No, not biased (or anymore than any other person who works for JD). Ed White is an old guy who wants to give you a complete answer. Everyone has that grandfather or dad. Rottenborn just seemed mean as opposed to taking the time to figure out how to manage the witness.
I think Heard’s lawyers behaviors reflect her temperament and personality and likewise, Depp’s reflect him - thought that was interesting!
Yes, good Observation Diane, wow!!!
~Kim
EW was keen to give correct context to the facts i.e. AH blew $13.5 million in 15 months + other things he didn’t manage to slip in. Reading between the lines of his testimony - He walked into a situation where almost everyone around his client was robbing him blind, including members of his own family (the other sister & her husband as well as AH & co + the previous lawyers, managers & agent. If I were him, I’d be fuming on behalf of my client as well!
Also, BC got at least 2 of the 3 prongs out of the ACLU lawyer - def about JD (+ someone on LB said USA Today linked it to him the next day), def conspiracy to avoid NDA breach & proof AH was pushing to keep in the TRO sentence = actual malice. I can’t remember if there’s anyone from the WP on the list to explain the headline, or if there’s written evidence to show AH approved it (vague memory of seeing something along those lines, but Laura B or Andrea B will know).
Thanks for sharing your take on all things JD vs AH. Have been following it since The Scum (UK name for the Sun) article as nothing added up after 30+ years of him being a decent person who occasionally abuses furniture.
I think that the USA connection in this case linking the 2 articles absolutely shows beyond a reasonable doubt that the article is about Johnny. I also believe that the fact with the emails showing AH wanting to keep JD and certain things in the article are also proof beyond a reasonable doubt that she intended malice. I am seriously hoping that the jury sees this as I do. Hope Johnny wins.
I thought it was creative for him to say either Johnny ran into a door or... if he would have tried to say what it really was they would have objected speculation and actually I'm surprised they didn't objection speculation when he did say the door thing.
Clever because that's what abuse victims always claim to cover up.
In the UK walking into a door is a synonym for DV
No. I believe the CPA felt badgered because AH’s lawyer was putting words in his mouth that he did not agree with
Same
I thought the lawyer was trying to twist the info the witness was trying to say in order to win. I want to hear the truth, not a “narrative”, if I was a juror it would have been offensive
Exactly DoryismyHero, I too want the truth & believe that the Jurors like some of us are genuinely disgusted with A. Heard's Lawyers, her Lawyers may cost her-YAY. LOL I am so glad he got in Heard's Wine Bill,
I think Ed White, the CPA, was extremely helpful in trying to establish the facts that wouldn't have come out without him trying to push the boundaries. Mr. White was justifiably judgmental of how Johnny's largess was exploited by Amber Heard (and all her hangers-on), and by Johnny's previous business managers (& perhaps others who represented him), and he was trying to protect Johnny going forward. It's called fiduciary responsibility. Good for Mr. White for doing all he could to get extra info into the court record. I think Johnny and his finances are at least, now, in the hands of good and ethical management.
I LOVED the excitement of the last live. Maybe new people didn't like it as much, but people who are your fans were excited with you.
I saw a diff YT video were they theorized that the lack of objecting from Johnny's attorneys was a strategy to make AH and her team look overly aggressive and mean.
Could be
I felt this. It looked to me like they were just sitting back to let Amber's lawyers car crash
Also opens the door for them regards AH.
@@LawyerYouKnow Hey David, there's a mock trial from the 80s of Richard III (murder of princes in the Tower) with an actual judge, jury and barristers. It's similar to this, really agressive prosecution, very meek and respectful defence. At one point an expert witness (Dr David Starkey to not name him) becomes so biased and unpleasant and the prosecution so disrespectful that it flips the trial and suddenly you see the patient, logical building of the defence's case. The jury acquits. It's fascinating to watch. you should try and see a copy, lawyering style would suit you immensely.
@@LawyerYouKnow I was watching a video where they believe Amber faked the bruises photos but they showed that the month Johnny was away, she had real bruises on her neck, arm and a black eye while Elon was sleeping over at Johnny's penthouse. Those were all real bruises. Can they contrast the bruises she really had the months Johnny was away to the fake bruise photos? ruclips.net/video/6q9xjN3S8ww/видео.html&ab_channel=IncrediblyAverage
I think you’re doing a great job with this RUclips malarkey! I stumbled across your channel and had no idea you were a newbie! Bless your heart being haranged by viewers. You keep on you’re doing brilliantly, and I think you’re very profesional. It’s your channel so say what you like about what you like! Some people are just out and out trolls.
I think the CPA did great. Yes he appears frustrated because the lawyer was not giving him a chance to speak.
No. Ed White seemed that he was trying to make sure there were no mistake in the meaning of his answer.
Agree
Would it be legal for Depp’s team to subpoena the place or places that AH goes to get fillers/injectables to see if her appointments correlate with the dates of the red-faced photos she’s submitted?
No it’s not illegal since they have medical and tax information
They should just have a makeup artist show how easy it is to fake bruising.
The Behavior Panel is a great resource of understanding the physical behavior of JD and AH … they read baseline and explain the body language of the two. … a great resource/tool for attorneys who want to read a witness on the stand…
Btw love the legal analysis - sub’d after 2nd view 🤟
I watched and enjoyed both of their analyses. They previously did one on AH's deposition for the UK trial.
I am so pleased Amber will be put on the stand. Who agrees that Amber will fold under pressure from Johnny's Counsel.
She likely will be highly medicated
I think she is going to come off unlikeable or like she is trying too hard. She never seems like she likes anyone except if it is someone praising her.
I hope she snaps and shows her true colours. But she is an actress, she's well rehearsed at her story... She's not well rehearsed at answering questions on her actions and her own words on audio.. oh god I hope she snaps!
I so appreciate you taking the time with us to talk about this trial and making things more clear for us... and it's a lot of fun following it with a group of kind people here! Def standing with JD.. And looking forward to maybe more funny witnesses next week (Johnny's bodyguard 👌 that was just hilarious) and just hearing explanations on testimonies en decisions that are made.
Thank you!
I definitely think he kind of annoyed the little old guy… I loved when he displayed how indignant he was at not being able to talk freely!
Elaine
Your my favorite Lawyer to explain things, you make it VERY understandable.
Ambers lawyer R seems to me to have feelings for her
You rock! I’m so glad I found your channel! Have a great weekend.
I liked the bodyguards! I think they were honest and just answering questions straight forward, very credible to me.
What did you think about the security guard commented about smuggling the dogs when questioned about MM in Australia
Really enjoying your channel. Thanks for sharing your time and knowledge. :)
You are my favorite lawyer! I'm happy your channel is growing so fast!
Really enjoy your channel. You give the best recap!!!
Thank you!
I think maybe more people would view your live streams if it started right after the end of session. Atleast that’s how I found you! I was confused and needed a solid recap asap and there you were. Keep up the great work!
I want to say I really appreciate your video recaps, it's one of my fav channels covering this trial. I feel for you trying to handle superchats and getting in the recap you wanted to do. On one hand you're getting a lot of Superchats which is very nice and supportive, but it can derail your video format flow. Perhaps if you have a Q&A section where you read all the superchats or separate the video into segments where you take a few chats in between segments, but I really wanted more of the recap, and I feel like once you got into the superchats it was too difficult to go back to your planned agenda - which was unfortunate for those viewers who tuned in for the actual recap.
Regardless, I want to reiterate, that I love your channel and your insight into how this trial is going and your interactions with the live viewers. Keep up the good work. Much appreciation.
No need to apologise Peter, growing the channel is super exciting and consider myself an OG!! Keep doing you brother! The contents great!!!
P money, thank you..my thoughts exactly. If you don't like what you're watching please do click off.
No! The CPA was just being thorough.
JD explained on redirect that the burn/drown texts were a spoof on the Monty Python scene about witches in The Holy Grail film. His friend Paul Bettany is British and JD has worked with Terry Gilliam who was one of the writers/performers in the Monty Python TV shows and films.
Some days I watch the trial and your review, other days the trial is a little slow and I love being able to stay up to date on it with your reviews. I really appreciate this kind of analysis (an expert giving good/relevant information with no extra embellishment).
Just found your channel recently and love it. Thank you for the great videos!
Congratulation on your channel growing. Continued success!
I can’t find any RUclipsr more endearing and apologetic for asking subscribers to hit the like bottom. Peeps who watch your channel should realize that hitting the like button is super important!
If ya don’t know, now ya know. Great livestream!
Just happened across you last night, am thoroughly enjoying the info, comments.
“Perjury is a statutory offence in England and Wales. A person convicted of perjury is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years, or to a fine, or to both.”
Was going to post this. it's the same in Canada and I think all Commonwealth countries. In Canada it can be a stint in a federal penitentiary since it can be more than 2 years. The length of the sentence depends on the effect on the trial and/or verdict usually.
Even if Amber is able to act convincingly on the stand, if I was on the jury by now I would know that she lies and fabricates, that she was often trying to set him up, and I would be very skeptical of anything she said.
The key is to keep them in a box; but to come across as a nice person while you’re doing it. So when they freak out on the stand; the jury feels badly for YOU (at least that’s the way I always do it; box em; question them politely; trap em; get em to freak on me; have the jury comment to me after the trial “that witness was so rude to you…”) and I laugh all the way to the verdict.
Missed the live but enjoyed the video. Very informative!
Some great questions from the community in this vid and your answers were easily understood too. Glad your channel is growing and I agree with you about your business strategy to use this platform for the synergy it could provide. Best of luck!
Me and my husband have been in stitches watching this but we have been on the megapints to be fair🤣, he's so easy to understand out of everyone covering this and Mrs Tragos even told jokes, sub and like guys❤️
We defo appreciate Mrs Tragos input. Behind every great man is a great woman.
BEEN ON THE MEGAPINTS -- my new favourite saying.
New scribed! If you were AH attorney, now seeing so much lying on her part, what do you talk to her about in private. How do you handle a liying client???
Great observations!! Love listening to you POV
You do you! Your channel, your format!!
You're doing fine don't let these people push you around
Ed was not arguing too much. Depp team should have objected more to the line of questioning. I found Ed to be frustrated with the way he was being cut off
You are the most accommodating YT personality that I have ever seen lol. I really appreciate your channel and the time you are putting into helping us understand this case!! Love your hair!!
I'm new to this channel of yours and I dig it. You have great commentary.
I think they're trying to show that amber also had trouble with drugs because amber's team was really trying to weaponize johnny's addiction.
I don't think the CPA was biased. I think the older gentleman was annoyed that the attorney was interrupting him
Just found and watched this vid. Enjoyed. Look forward to more. Now subscribed. From New Zealand. Leshhgoo!!
Hi there, from Down Under🐨🌿. Good on you getting out there and answering questions (some +times) always with happy demeanor willing to help. You must have a very patient wife sharing your time with work and here! A big kudos to her! 😉
No I don’t think he showed toomuch bias. Rottenborn seemed super flustered and would have rubbed me the wrong way as the jury. I think that he could have done a better job controlling the witness for sure
Carino's statement should have an impact on the "defamation" case as he did say that the op-ed was the reason why he was not getting movies. This proves that he was defamed and the op-ed was the reason why he lost out on everything. Isn't that good proof that he was defamed? Carino was a friend for both so he can't be biased.
Thanks! just started following you utb site. Been watching AH/JD Love the comments and your analysis of the testimony.
I'm new to your channel and new about Depp case thanks for explaining the case. Ramon from Holiday Fl.
In response to your question about is it appropriate to go have fun with your friends after being abused my response doubtful. As a dv/sv survivor, I was in too much physical pain from injuries to go party. Also I had so much shame and guilt after each incident the last thing I wanted to do was be seen by friends or family. I wanted to jump through my laptop screen and slap Rottenborn when he asked that question.
She TOLD she DONATED $7 ml, there is video of her saying this, the biggest evidence. So yes, it means she is a LIAR
Yeah she said in this Dutch TV show that she donated ALL $7 million
She Has Said she Paid it all, Really??? Omgosh so she will be Proven to be a Liar!
@@livingdeeply15 yeah she said it herself on the TV show, the host starts asking about the divorce settlement money at 1:25 ruclips.net/video/hBH5O1ukpq8/видео.html
@@livingdeeply15 her own words from one tv show
@@damiraa5375 I finally saw that!!! She lied, she proved me right!!
I enjoyed you're enthusiasm the other night with your growing subscription numbers in real time...and of course your professional insights.
Went back to watch yesterday's video and I actually really enjoyed how genuine and excited you were by the growth on your channel. It is also the video that has convinced me to subscribe because you were such a sweetheart to your viewers. You have nothing to apologize for!
Rooting for you 💙✨
I wonder if Heard’s team are trying to trick the jury. They’re being nasty and overly aggressive now. When Heard is up, will they be likeable and less annoying? I wonder if a huge contrast in strategy will change the atmosphere and make her and her team more agreeable and under a different light.
I know this sounds completely backwards but I’m curious if they planned their strategy. They’re just so bad it can’t be real!
In most trials I've seen cross examination tends to be less than cordial...no?
@@radvibes only when someone isn't cooperating.
Her lawyers just attack anyone from the 1st question.
This is fun so don’t change please!
Yes, we want the recap in the beginning!
Great recap 👍 ty
Amber is so self-important it's REALLY hard for me to believe she's the "silver bullet" for her side, that she's gonna turn it all over.
Certainly there’s no way deep down she believes she can pull this con off…She’s been totally exposed now and has no credibility…. All eyes are on her and JD will be sitting right in front of her. I think she’s in full panic mode and finds some way in which to not testify… 🤔
That’s my theory for what it’s worth 🤷🏻♀️ 😉
@@dyanalynn6698 , remember, she's still a well trained actress
@@dyanalynn6698 I agree, I hope she doesn't hurt herself just so she doesn't have to testify.
She'll say that Johnny controlled her.Was jealous.Stopped her working on some films.
@@MauiBodyworker Well she’s made it to the stand however I’ve only been able to stomach in total…. about 5 minutes in as many attempts… so I get info on what she’s testified to from Lawtube. All I can say
is I really hope she has the capability to reach deep down for some humility when all is said and done and her support system is looking at her like “You ended you Amber, no one but you did this to your career”
She’ll be lucky to get that 10 min in Aqua man…and doesn’t end up in an Australian court
🤷🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤷🏻♀️
Johnny's financial advisor seemed like an older generation guy like me who seemed outraged by the demands made by Amber for a 15 month marriage and the spending she did during the marriage.
Thanks for the video
I get excited to see you excited for your channel growth or number of people in the chat!!
I truly don’t understand why that bothers the 1% . I guarantee most of us don’t mind at all and are cheering you on!
Thoroughly enjoy your content and now a new subscriber! I have a feeling you'll reach your 5k over the weekend without a doubt and how about "The Jury Pool" as the name of your followers? Enjoy your weekend! 👍 💛
Coachella is the last place I would want to go after a physical fight with my husband.
Please don't worry about not doing a good job. I love your channel and think you are doing great!!
Love this channel soo soo much xx
Loved E White thought he was a professional
3:10 start here
Thank you! I really like this channel
Really enjoying your content. Haven’t missed one video since Theranos
Awesome!!