Does Trump’s Second Impeachment Trial Violate Free Speech Rights? The Two Sides Debate.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 дек 2024

Комментарии • 5

  • @rainman7992
    @rainman7992 3 года назад

    is a popular analogy for speech or actions made for the principal purpose of creating panic. The phrase is a paraphrasing of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.'s opinion in the United States Supreme Court case in 1919, which held that the defendant's speech in opposition to the draft during World War I was not protected free speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The case was later partially overturned by in 1969, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot).

  • @bjs2022
    @bjs2022 3 года назад

    Jennifer’s bad sound makes good video look bad.

  • @mikejohnr1315
    @mikejohnr1315 3 года назад +1

    Maybe that dude should put the phone on speaker ...