From official rules: Do not enter this Sweepstakes if you are not a USA resident. www.getenteredtowin.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Winchester-Trench-Shotgun-Sweepstakes-Official-Rules-8.31.23.docx.pdf
@KaiziGarden The winner was an LEO, who is not subject to their rules. I think it's wrong for LEOs to not be subject to the same rules as everyone else, but that's tangential to the question.
In the early 70s, as a young private at Ft Ord, we were issued these shotguns for post guard guard duty. During familiarizing myself, I slam fired a full magazine. I was immediately pulled off the firing line by the range officer. He had no idea you could do that with one of these!!
@@ETC_Rohaly_USCG BRAC really impacted a lot of communities when the bases were shut. I have family around the former Plattsburgh, Rome, and Loring AFB's who remember the subsequent downturn.
@@JuddKramer yeah I remember how it impacted El Toro naval air station, and Orange County and the fight that ensued for years about what to do with the land
@@adamcuneo7189 bonus fact: Jeff Bridges (aka: The Dude) was a Coastie. Look up the meme, “the Coast Guard will make you crazy by the time you’re done” lol Too true! 😂
The old video of Ian dressed in uniform with the trenchgun, swearing about the hypocrisy of the Germans calling shotguns a war crime, meanwhile using mustard gas all across Europe, is a classic that I regularly revisit.
Fun fact: Winchester actually kept detailed logs of production dates and serial number ranges. It fell by the way side during both WWs, but was picked up again in the interwar and postwar eras. I have one that was produced in 1947, but does have US Armory stamps, meaning it likely saw service during the Korean War. They produced model 1897s until sometime in the '60s.
A year ago I helped a woman go through her late husband's gun collection. To my absolute shock, I pulled out a WW2 1897, with heat shield. The story behind it was that was the gun he ran for his cowboy competition. He probably bought it cheap and used it in competition for decades. I wanted that gun so bad, but I couldn't meet the value at the time out of fairness to her.
I love seeing the trench guns (whether real or repro) at Wild Bunch matches... I have always thought however that it should be MANDATORY to use them WITH bayonet! (Rather than prohibited by the rules lol)
I would have taken it in exchange for helping her. Friend of mine, when he was kid in the 1980's took a BAR in exchange for helping a guy pick up and install a water heater. It was in the basement, he asked about it. Guy said it was left behind by an old roommate. He took it instead of cash. Didn't know what it was. Opened it up on fulll auto on his farm. Dad came running out and took it away. Dad sold it. I helped a co worker when her husband died. All he had was a .22 hand gun and rifle. Why can't I find a BAR or a WWI 1897 trench gun?
To be perfectly fair, being hypocritical doesn't make you factually wrong, it just makes you an ass. Just because the guys using flamethrowers and poison gas (which EVERYONE was using) were complaining about shotguns, that doesn't mean shotty's aren't worthy of warcrime status. Hollowpoints (which are a warcrime) are less nasty than buckshot, so in this case, the hypocrites have a point.
The gap between the bayonet and the shroud over the barrel also suggest functionality in bayonet fighting. The US Army was using Canadian bayonet manuals for training. These manuals included very close range attack which was an upward jab under the chin. This gap and shroud would have made it possible to execute this technique.
Exactly it fits the hand like brass knuckles with your other hand on the neck of the stock, you can carve, spear, jab, bludgeon, punch, thrust, etc. Super effective. Surprised Ian didn't touch on that because I've read that is the reasoning for that particular shape.
I had a Model 1897 in Vietnam. I carried double 00 buck shot, but didn't have a bayonet for it. I left it hanging on the wall of my hooch in when I left in February 1973.
@@drewmetz389 If only his service mattered to anything thanks to our lack of politicla will. Millions of South Vietnamese in camps, Moutain-Yards genocided. And we say we are the good guys when we abandon our allies left and right
Many years ago I read the letters home of a young lieutenant in the Philippines. His father bought him an 1897 and told him to take it with him everywhere, including dinner and the head. .
Interesting reference to Shrapnel shell. Contrary to common usage where fragments from any exploding shell is called shrapnel, the original Shrapnel shell, invented by Lieutenant Henry Shrapnel in 1784 and termed 'spherical case shot', carried musket balls in a case with an exploding charge. A Shrapnel shell for the British 60-pounder of WWI carried "about 990 bullets , 35 to the pound." Effectively, one hell of a big, long-range shotgun.
It actually helps a ton if a person is pumped up on adrenaline and loses fine motor skills. Not having to time the release and pull of the trigger is a huge benefit. I have a rare Model 12 Heavy duck that does it and I love it
@@hughgrection3052 Have one too. Does yours have the ribbed Simmons barrel or the ribbed factory barrel? Mine sadly does not have a rib, bought it at a random pawn shop for $650 a few years ago, and funnily enough they actually had 3 of them on the shelves. Looking back I should've also bought the Ithaca M37 that was on the shelves too, but I didn't wanna miss a car payment.
@RZeppelin Mine is actually the even more rare model with the solid rib on top. Its a shame someone cut it down. But it's also what caught my eye on it when it was on the shelf. The typical standard Model 12 has the long sort of ugly barrel look. This one tho had the cool riot gun look to it. I payed just 450 for it. They're the hands down best combat shotguns even till this very day. It even cycles mini shells with no need for an adapter. Beautiful gun tho with lots of heavy wear on it and character. I too would like to own an Ithaca in the same riot setup or trench. I'm not sure how I feel yet about the downwards ejection tho. Seems like a slip and trip hazard indoors on hard floors to eject cases there. They're crazy cool too tho. I wish a company would make modern tactical furniture for the Model 12s tho. I'd buy up them all of so and cut them down and turn them into little beasts. Does yours have the red stock rubber pad?
@@hughgrection3052 My Model 12 3IN is a full 32 Inch long barrel, and I don't intend on cutting it down because it is completely original with a very good B+ blued finish. If I ever found one already at 18IN mark I would purchase it in a heartbeat (so long as it isn't more then $600) or if I got one that was in very poor condition and I could look past the surface condition to cut it down to 18 or 20 inches. Mine has the original red rubber butt pad too, and it still is in a moderately rubbery feel and isn't hard as a rock. Too bad Norinco is banned in the USA, I would love to get one of their 1897 clones, they are around $350 in Canada and can slamfire. Thats only time I would ever wish to be Canadian is for their Norinco imports, like the type 81 or their cheap shotguns.
I found one of these disassembled mostly complete in a cabinet that was in my grandpa’s garage. I reassembled it as much as I could but I’ll have to buy some parts to complete it. It will be a wall hanger. The production date is 1913. Pretty cool, I think.
Man, the one you reviewed is in FANTASTIC condition for being almost a century old! It's always wonderful to see such TLC into preserving a piece of history. I can just picture a young American GI death-gripping that gun from within his trench, waiting for the signal to go over the top. Amazing.
Working for a large outdoor retailer as a Gun Vault Specialist, I got to accompany our Used Gun Lead on an offsite appraisal and purchase. Most of the guns were older hunting guns, but a few caught my eye. There was a chromed M1886 Mannlicher with Chilean export marks. I thought it was an M1888 at first, but educated myself while he was meticulously examining the other guns. There was also a Khyber Pass Martini-Enfield copy that we had to pass on due to safety issues. I honed in on three of the guns: an 1897, 1892, and an M1 Carbine with a cheesy looking stock. The 1897 is an original Riot version (but not the military Trench Gun, lacking the heat shield and bayonet lug). The serial number puts it at an 1899 production. The 1892 is chambered in .38 WCF and its serial number puts it as 1894 production. The M1 is an Inland manufactured one, made in late 1941 or early 1942, and the stock turned out to be an original 1960s Owens wire stock, as seen in one of the photos of the Symbionese Liberation Army.
Fudds are the ones that have always been using these shotguns. Nowadays all the tacticool kids think the AR is the answer to whatever question is being asked.
@@brivas3343, That's because the AR is the answer in most cases. Lightweight, very accurate, low recoil and high ammo capacity plus lower penetration inside a home, makes it a good choice for home defense. Not to mention the plethora of accessories like weapon mounted lights, suppressors, etc. make it a good choice. Nothing wrong, inherently, with a shotgun for close range work, but an AR is usually a better choice. BTW, lest you think I'm a "tacticool kid" I'm 63 years old.
Army vet here. My dad have his rock island armory AR shotgun with a 50 round drum loaded with nothing but birdshot which he swears up and down it will rip an attacker to shreds much worse than 00 buck....shit makes me cringe. My 590a1 is plum full of 00 buck. He thinks I'm wrong....smh
Man, your old 1897 trench gun video, where you were in uniform and bashing the germans for their complaints about the trench gun, is one of those videos I still go back to. This is the better historical/informational video, but the other one is just American as hell and absolutely funny.
Well the Germans were a bunch of hypocrites because they used things like mustard gas, and were allied with the Ottomans who were responsible for the Armenian Genocide.
Why do you not write the fact, that between 1815 and long into 1980s, no shotguns had been used as service weapon. Only in 1830s/ 1840s few of southern german states bought a small number of percussion side by side shotguns. They had been sometimes handed to the up to 1890s/1900s only saberarmed policemen, mostly when fighting poachery, or escort a large number of prisoners to a prison. The 19th/20th century german/austrian counterpart to US Wild West literature had been novels, in which either a Forrest Service official ( Förster) or a lawfull licenced huntsman fights poachers , smugglers or other criminals in the Woods. The heroic characters are armed with rifles, while shotguns, when appearing, had been the weapons of the criminals. Perhaps you now understand, that german soldiers of wwl saw shotguns not as service weapons, but as weapons, used by criminals, so the shotgun armed US soldiers, other ones don' t used them, as criminals.
@@brittakriep2938 Well maybe you can understand how that DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. The U.S. came into war to end the bullshit, not to kowtow to the same fucking people who had no problem starting a World War in the first place.
When I was an MP at Fort Bragg in the late 1990s, we still had these, including bayonets(!) - in the Arms Room for "Riot Control." But... we never took them out for qualification. But they sure were cool to look at!
I mean, this was shortly after the government actually had to deploy the Marines to put down rioting in L.A. Also, most angry mobs are not even going to try and charge a bayonet line.
The whole 'slam fire' thing can actually serve as an interesting way to prevent malfunctions. Compared to semiauto guns, pump guns have a strict rhythm of pushing the pump forward, then pulling it backward, then pulling the trigger. Slamfiring not only removes a step from that process, but allows you to avoid the order-of-operations issue that can lead to ejecting live rounds or even short stroking. You could argue that it's just a substitute for proper training, but combined with the faster fire rate, I think the package does give you some interesting capabilities.
Yeah, it's a side effect of a solution to the much bigger problem of ensuring the gun can only fire in battery. The AK-47's battery sear is basically the same, but with barrel gas doing the pumping.
That bayonet mount was also special because it could be used as a secondary grip just for cqb. Imagine holding it like a pugil stick or staff weapon, one hand on the back and one up front, allowing you to swing and strike with the buttplate, slash and stab with the bayonet and use the body of the rifle to parry and block. I can see it being most effective in close quarters situations.
This was a terrific presentation. I feel like there should be an Ithaca Model 37 as used in Vietnam video, as well. Just, uh.. just puttin' that out there.
When I was a rookie cop we had shotguns capable of slam fire. We were taught that, when you shove the slide forward shove it at the target and you would hit the target! I was surprised how effective it was. We all were sad to see our slam fire shotgun get traded in on newer shotguns without slam fire capability. But the insurance companies and city attorneys insisted on it even though we never had a bad shooting from a slam fire!
@@LexYeen Decades ago I paid next to nothing for an Ithaca 37. Could never get *MY* timing right. Got too used to keeping my finger on the trigger. Figured that eventually I'd do something stupid.
Yeah, the competence of many officers in the current generation has dropped so low that even with good training they still chronically do stupid things, getting themselves in trouble and others hurt. Having the slam fire is great for well trained and self-regulated people, we are just running dangerously low on said individuals.
I have a bayonet that is said to go with a Mossberg shotgun. It resembles the Israeli Mauser 9" bayonet In the "old West", shotbuns were used about as much as pistols in gunfights. Especially by "Doc" Holiday
I have a history degree with emphasis in WWI and have always obsessed over owning a Winchester 1897! However, considering their rarity and price, I opted for a Mossberg 590 Retrograde. I love it for its classic "trench gun" look. Wood stock, heatshield, bayonet lug, etc.. Just can't slam-fire, which I'm okay with. I threw an M7 bayonet, reproduction WWI leather sling, and a reproduction WWI ammo pouch, to compensate lol Would still love to win this Winchester 1897 though!
My battalion in West Berlin mid-1980s had four Winchester 12-gauge military shotguns intended for ammunition guards.They tended to never leave the Headquarters Company arms room. Having fallen in love with them after shooting one at Rose Range next the Wannsea, I asked to be issued one for alerts and exercises. They still used the M1917 bayonet. Loved the weapon, and its uniqueness sent a message. Had a faux terrorist meant to test my command post's security set off his bomb when he saw me charge with the weapon, killing himself, me and the door guard, but the CP continued to manage the battle.
The 728th MP BN companies (552, 557, 57, 188) in Korea in the mid 1990's still had dozens of these in the arms room which were carried by the Korean Contract security guards. I wish that I knew more about the history of the weapons as I was inventorying them back then as it would have been neat to see if any were WWI vintage. I wonder if they were ever sent back to Anniston Army depot, and if they would ever be available through the CMP
@HessianLikeTheFabric , it was part of the exercise play. It was a Soldier pretending to be a terrorist pretending to be a Soldier wearing the wrong headgear holding a briefcase bomb.
I actually found and bought one a few weeks ago. It's missing the heat shield and bayonet but everything else is original. Beautiful gun. The store also had a model 12 as well but I was more interested in the 1897.
My brother has a ww2 model. I have 6 model 97 Winchester in both 12 and 16 gauges. Not all are in working condition. But several are. Great all around weapons.
The 1897 Trench Gun is my go to meme whenever something can be solved with a lot of judiciously applied firepower. Things like Huge Spiders, Coconut Crabs, eerie videos showing something weird and scary. You may call me a Fudd, but between the M1 Garand, the 1911 and the 1897, you may not pack the latest and tactical supremacy, but you can bring a lot of impressive kaboom to an argument.
I found out about the 1897 Trench Gun some years ago when my gunsmith had his out on the bench for routine maintenance. On first examination, I thought it a funky, clunky item until he told us that you could “fan it”. He had to explain what that meant - the concept of a pump-action being “fanned” took a certain amount of grasping. Coincidentally, soon after, one of the guys in the club pulled a Norinco 1897 out of his truck after the formal business of the day was finished. He asked if anyone wanted to try it out. Ha, ha, ha. I volunteered. We walked down the range a bit and I fed a few shells into the mag tube. I caught the eye of my friend who had been at the tutorial from our gunsmith. He nodded. I pointed the gun down range and fired, being careful not to release the trigger. I looked at my friend again. He nodded again. He also grinned. I emptied the magazine. It did not take long. I showed clear and turned around. A variety of expressions showed on the faces present, primarily surprise or disbelief. I handed the gun back to the owner (his expression was horror) and thanked him. I got the feeling that my friend and I were the only ones present that knew an 1897 Winchester could do that. @thegoldencaulk2742 is correct. Unforgettable is the right word.
I have a Norinco clone of the 1897 Trench, it's got some nice benefits, namely it's set up for modern shells out of the box, but you still get the raw joy of an 1897 without paying out a stupid amount for an actual historical piece, or finding an 1897 fowling gun and having it converted. Honestly words cannot describe how damn fun my Trench gun is. I love that damn thing.
I have one too......and you are right, it is lots of fun.......it's excactly like this one, but new.....have shot it quite a bit.....and like the original it is very reliable.....only downside for me is country of manufacturing.....
My brothers and I will be handed down an M1897 from my great grandfather, grandfather and eventually, my father. It was made in I believe 1916, if I remember correctly. It is a hunting '97, not the trench version, though. Still a really fun shotgun.
I've always wanted one just for the external hammer design. I don't care about the slamfire. The heat shield and bayonet lug would always be a welcome bonus.
Living (as always) vicariously through your experiences, Ian! I'd love one of these and always had a bit of a fascination for them. Cheers again for all you do.
Yeah. Don't get me wrong, they're crazy badass weapons. IMO tho one has to consider the context of the era they was used tho. These are in no way better than a more reliable, stronger and more accurate rifle. But... this was when a single messenger pigeon being let loose by the enemy could spell disaster for your forces if it was able to escape. So they would hand out tons of shotguns to use more for the birds, but also kill at close range effectively when needed. The fact they had so many around made up for the fact they used buckshot instead of birdshot. If not for the bird aspect, they would have skipped these totally. Which is exactly what happened eventually for what should be obvious reasons. People tend to think they was used because of how effective they was vs Germans. That just isn't the case. Rifles did that better and was reloaded quicker too. But, I own a rare Model 12 Heavy duck and love it to death. It was sawed off to 18 inches and has the rare ability to fire 3 inch shells instead of just 2 3/4 shells. You'd think at least Ian would know they wasn't there for reasons most people assume and mention that. But, regardless they're awesome as hell guns. I love the flaming bomb too. The slamfire is alot more useful than he said also. It prevent a soldier who's amped on adrenaline from messing up the fire sequencing of not releasing then pulling the trigger in the right orders. So it made them much more effective. Great guns. A trench is on my bucket list for sure
It's widely misunderstood today - the Germans didn't seriously think the protest was going to achieve anything but it was the latest stage in an ongoing tit-for-tat between the Entente and Central powers about who was the most barbaric. First the Brits complained about German "butcher blades" then the Germans complained about British "dum-dum bullets" then the Brits complained about gas so the Germans complained about mining and so on. No one expected it to make any difference on the battlefield - it was all propaganda meant to rile up the domestic audience.
@frenchfrey65 And here I was saying why they are legendary to the point of a meme. What a coinkdink. All the laughter and sheer humor must have affected my reasoning. By all means, proceed with the thing that is maximum humor and the merry making that you do so well, that I so rudely interrupted. My apolgies....😉
@@hughgrection3052The trench gun serves the same purpose as a submachine gun. Each pellet is ballistically equivalent to a 9mm pistol bullet. The US army never ordered or issued bird shot loads for them - only buckshot (in cardboard and later full brass cartridges (the brass cartridges arrived too late for WW1 but were used widely in WW2)).
I came across a variant of the 1897 trench guns in a civilian DOD security guard arms room circa 2001. They even had the bayonets. Beautiful gun and it had been well maintained. If smart phones had existed I'd have taken a photo.
I remember seeing an MP pulling guard duty with this shotgun at an on-post Bank at Fort Bragg in 1980. It was still a hell of a weapon then, and still is today.
Surely the British antipathy towards using shotguns on the battlefield was more likely born of a reluctance to use a Gentleman's fowling piece on mere Germans.
It's fascinating to learn about the Winchester 1897 Trench Gun's role in WW1 and how it evolved to suit various combat conditions. The versatility and adaptability of firearms during that era truly showcased American ingenuity in weaponry. Thanks for sharing this historical perspective on firearms in World War I
I was an MP in the early 70s. We are all kinds of shotguns in the armory. We even carried them on patrol in the car. My favorite was the 1897 which we still had. I liked it because the external hammer you could carry safely with a round in the chamber and hammer on half cock.
I personally just bought an 1897 Tench gun built in 1907. It has a 28” barrel. No clue about it’s history but for 116 years old it’s in pretty good shape.
Also from the Revolution to the US Civil War, Americans were loading their smoothbore muskets with buck-and-ball loads, so the idea of combat buckshot goes all the way back to the beginning for America.
I have a Norinco short 1897 copy and I’ve always wanted to fit it with a heat shield, but every one for sale says they don’t fit the Norinco guns. Super fun shotgun, my go to out of the several I own. Despite being short the recoil isn’t bad due to the weight, but it isn’t even that heavy.
I recall Norinco used to sell its 1897 in the military trench gun configuration a few years ago, but I haven't seen any lately. The quality has apparently dropped a bit with the more recent clones.
Back in the early 80s, I had a classmate whose dad was a retired US Army Major who had a long barreled M1897 - a very cool piece. Though I do prefer the Riot/Trench version!
There’s still some Norinco clones around in Canada, they were reasonably priced too at around $350. Quality was decent and they could be slam fired like the original.
Thanks for the recommendation. You're right about that, myself and my family never went that route when purchasing firearms, but I've seen people who have. I was looking at that, and yes, the Type 81 is still classified as non restricted because it's closer to the SKS than an AK "varient", it's just expensive ($1,300 CDN) I'm sorry for your experience but from what people have told me, they've never had experiences like that at gun stores. In Canada, gun safety is part of your course to get your firearms licence which is legally required to purchase firearms, along with a three day waiting period for handguns and certain other guns (restricted) That was the first thing our instructor said in our possession and accusation course (PAL) always control the muzzle direction and never use your scope, use binoculars. We also have a specific hunter safety course that's required to get your license to hunt.
Its funny that Germany would protest the shotgun considering that they were the ones that first brought poison gas and flamethrowers to the battle field.
C&Rsenal also did a in-depth look to this iconic shotgun with Mae shooting it and their thoughts about it. Check that episode out if you want to get into the history of it.
I believe the 3-screw clamp was still not enough to resist movement under recoil, so the screw holes in the adapter were drilled for a slight interference fit with the barrel. The barrel then had three slight cross-wise 'troughs' cut into them to match the screws for a mechanical, as well as a friction, lock.
I was a Georgia deputy sheriff in the 70's-90's. I carried one of these, sans bayonet (but I did HAVE one) for years. My other "long" gun was a 1928 Thompson. I worked 3rd shift by myself for years. My "back up" was that 1897 made in 1927 and that 1928 made in 1935. If either one of those came out of the car, no one wanted play. Two burglars who had shot at law enforcement in other counties said they would not commit crimes in our county. Why? "That 3rd shift deputy is CRAZY!" I took that as high compliment. Unfortunately, I lost both of them in a tragic "boating accident" years ago.
Look, if some Yankee came in charging over the wire and blasting Fritz and Hans with a shotgun before gutting me with his bayonet, I'd be one Sour Kraut, too.
There were probably a few reasons why other forces didn't field shotguns in WWI. One was concern that they didn't meet the laws of war. There was an Australian officer on Gallipoli in 1915, a Boer War veteran named Stephen Midgely DSO, who used a sawn-off double on trench raids: " The “Old Bird” is a holy terror in these raids. He’s only an exceptionally small chap and no youth either, but he is about the most murderous old devil in the regiment. He leads these raids with a hell of a yell as he jumps down into the trench, blazing to the right and left with a sawn-off shotgun. An ordinary service revolver is no good for him.” At least one of his fellow officers also used the shotgun for the same purpose, before Midgely was ordered to put it away by the brass, on the basis apparently that it wasn't quite the thing. I think the Turks may also have had something to say about it. Given that trenches were also cleared with trench mortars and jam-tin bombs (improvised grenades) in the same campaign it hardly seems to make sense.
"Wasn't quite the thing" sounds more than a little bit of an "officers are all of the opinion that war ought to be a gentlemanly sport" thing than anything else. Anybody who had to actually jump into a trench would not have hesitated to take one of these over a service revolver every single time, 10 out of 10, no exceptions.
The interaction with the Army officer is 100% believable, especially the response given to him. I have had very similar conversations while in the service and currently in the private sector with Army officers…
my son Ethan got one of these, fully functional, off a friend needing money, for the closeout price of $250... 2 years ago. Mine was built in 1907, runs like a charm....despite the age , I think Ill keep it! The shotgun I mean, not my son...he is a newer model....🤭
We had one come through the store I worked at. It had the US flaming bomb on the receiver. But one of the previous owners had ground off the bayonet lug and removed the head shield
for those who don't know, you DO NOT have to purchase ANYTHING in order to win the trench gun! all US based prize giveaways like this one are required by law to have a method of entering to with WITHOUT purchase of anything. You will often hear "no purchase necessary to win" at the end of TV ads for giveaways for this reason. The method for free entry is generally extremely annoying and extremely specific with many steps, but by law it has to exist. This also applies to things like the McDonalds Monopoly game lol. i used to enter all sorts of giveaways by mailing in, but it truly is extremely annoying an time consuming. Purchasing just gives you what is legally called an "automatic entry". You are paying to not be annoyed by your entry method
The German did not protest against the use of shotguns, they protest against the use of full lead buckshots which can be considered as expansive ammo. Those ammunitions are forbidden under the 1899 Hague declaration.
Get Entered to WIN this original 1897 Trench Gun!
go.getenteredtowin.com/forgottenweapons
DEADLINE to ENTER is 09/29/23 @ 11:59pm (PST).
From official rules: Do not enter this Sweepstakes if you
are not a USA resident. www.getenteredtowin.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Winchester-Trench-Shotgun-Sweepstakes-Official-Rules-8.31.23.docx.pdf
Boo, have to buy a coffee mug for entry.
How you gonna deal with the FG-42 winner in NY? Does FG-42 legal in the NY?
Ian, do they ship it into Finland?!?
@KaiziGarden The winner was an LEO, who is not subject to their rules. I think it's wrong for LEOs to not be subject to the same rules as everyone else, but that's tangential to the question.
This is like the polar opposite of a Forgotten Weapon. This is an unforgettable weapon.
True. Ain't complaining, though!
It werfs flammen!!
Notorious Weapons
Notorious Weapons
Iconic Weapons
In the early 70s, as a young private at Ft Ord, we were issued these shotguns for post guard guard duty. During familiarizing myself, I slam fired a full magazine. I was immediately pulled off the firing line by the range officer. He had no idea you could do that with one of these!!
My Uncle was at Ft. Ord during Vietnam. You’re only the second person I’ve heard of that was stationed there.
Sad to see what became of it 😢
@@ETC_Rohaly_USCG BRAC really impacted a lot of communities when the bases were shut. I have family around the former Plattsburgh, Rome, and Loring AFB's who remember the subsequent downturn.
Fun fact: Clint Eastwood was actually stationed at Ft Ord when he was in the Army from 1951 to 1953.
@@JuddKramer yeah I remember how it impacted El Toro naval air station, and Orange County and the fight that ensued for years about what to do with the land
@@adamcuneo7189 bonus fact: Jeff Bridges (aka: The Dude) was a Coastie. Look up the meme, “the Coast Guard will make you crazy by the time you’re done” lol
Too true! 😂
The old video of Ian dressed in uniform with the trenchgun, swearing about the hypocrisy of the Germans calling shotguns a war crime, meanwhile using mustard gas all across Europe, is a classic that I regularly revisit.
Germany in WWI: "Buckshot is evil and inhumane!"
Also Germany in WWI: *sprays people with burning sticky gasoline*
Link?
ruclips.net/video/Z0D6p3w2qgY/видео.html@@madsclausen4028
I like Garand Thumb's version where he's in a Doughboy uniform putting an 1897 through its paces.
@@madsclausen4028 ruclips.net/video/Z0D6p3w2qgY/видео.html
Fun fact: Winchester actually kept detailed logs of production dates and serial number ranges. It fell by the way side during both WWs, but was picked up again in the interwar and postwar eras.
I have one that was produced in 1947, but does have US Armory stamps, meaning it likely saw service during the Korean War. They produced model 1897s until sometime in the '60s.
Not sure thats a "fun fact" so much as it is common knowledge?
@@komradechampa348 I found that fact to be fun
I also think it is a fun fact and not so much common knowledge. Thank you for that information.
Someone told me that they saw limited service in Vietnam too?
also no mention of John Brownings genius design @@komradechampa348
Last time I was this early the Archduke was still getting in his car on June 28th 1914
LMAO CLASSIC
Accurate, I was there lol
Last time I was this early, there had only been 2 battles of the Isonzo
"Take me out."
Franz Ferdinand
I was there with ma boi Gavrilo eating Schiller's luscious sandwich.
A year ago I helped a woman go through her late husband's gun collection. To my absolute shock, I pulled out a WW2 1897, with heat shield. The story behind it was that was the gun he ran for his cowboy competition. He probably bought it cheap and used it in competition for decades. I wanted that gun so bad, but I couldn't meet the value at the time out of fairness to her.
You're a better man than me! I would have asked what she wanted for it right on the spot haha.
You did the right thing.
I love seeing the trench guns (whether real or repro) at Wild Bunch matches... I have always thought however that it should be MANDATORY to use them WITH bayonet! (Rather than prohibited by the rules lol)
I would have taken it in exchange for helping her.
Friend of mine, when he was kid in the 1980's took a BAR in exchange for helping a guy pick up and install a water heater. It was in the basement, he asked about it. Guy said it was left behind by an old roommate. He took it instead of cash. Didn't know what it was. Opened it up on fulll auto on his farm. Dad came running out and took it away. Dad sold it.
I helped a co worker when her husband died. All he had was a .22 hand gun and rifle.
Why can't I find a BAR or a WWI 1897 trench gun?
I had a similar experience but it was a dragunov and a couple retro ARS.
Shotgun = cruel and inhumane. Flamethrower = perfectly fine.
And don't forget mustard and chlorine gasses!
Yep. "It's really effective but we didn't think of it first so it's cheating".
To be perfectly fair, being hypocritical doesn't make you factually wrong, it just makes you an ass. Just because the guys using flamethrowers and poison gas (which EVERYONE was using) were complaining about shotguns, that doesn't mean shotty's aren't worthy of warcrime status. Hollowpoints (which are a warcrime) are less nasty than buckshot, so in this case, the hypocrites have a point.
Then again, I'm an unironic fan of William T. Sherman and Winston Churchill; I'm not in any better position to complain about shotguns.
@@nextcaesargaming5469 do it again uncle Billy!
The gap between the bayonet and the shroud over the barrel also suggest functionality in bayonet fighting. The US Army was using Canadian bayonet manuals for training. These manuals included very close range attack which was an upward jab under the chin. This gap and shroud would have made it possible to execute this technique.
Exactly it fits the hand like brass knuckles with your other hand on the neck of the stock, you can carve, spear, jab, bludgeon, punch, thrust, etc. Super effective. Surprised Ian didn't touch on that because I've read that is the reasoning for that particular shape.
Basically a buckshot slinging spear lol
I had a Model 1897 in Vietnam. I carried double 00 buck shot, but didn't have a bayonet for it. I left it hanging on the wall of my hooch in when I left in February 1973.
Thank you for your service.
@@drewmetz389 If only his service mattered to anything thanks to our lack of politicla will. Millions of South Vietnamese in camps, Moutain-Yards genocided. And we say we are the good guys when we abandon our allies left and right
@@SaladofStones If you were really passionate about whatever it is you're trying to say here, you might want to learn to write clearly.
"Sir, the Americans are here"
"Splendid, what did they bring?"
"Shotguns and Thompsons"
"Oh, great. Gangsters and cowboys"
Damn right 🤠
That's it ..
That's all you need
*Splendid
@@garypulliam3421 thanks.
Yanks charging towards the trenches with Big Iron blaring
The most aesthetically pleasing gun out there. Its just peak "old school cool"
Many years ago I read the letters home of a young lieutenant in the Philippines. His father bought him an 1897 and told him to take it with him everywhere, including dinner and the head. .
Interesting reference to Shrapnel shell. Contrary to common usage where fragments from any exploding shell is called shrapnel, the original Shrapnel shell, invented by Lieutenant Henry Shrapnel in 1784 and termed 'spherical case shot', carried musket balls in a case with an exploding charge. A Shrapnel shell for the British 60-pounder of WWI carried "about 990 bullets , 35 to the pound." Effectively, one hell of a big, long-range shotgun.
The Winchester 1897, the shotgun that set the standard for ass kicking in shotguns.
Hold up there....the classic coach gun would like a word with you.
@@SlavicCeleryNay, laddie. Me gran's ol' blunderbuss does the job right fine, if ye need more'n a single blow, yer a deadman regardless
@@bigtasty42069 Wait a few, a handful of rocks guy is going to show up.
What about one of JMB’s earlier designs the 1887 in 10 gauge
The classic coach gun is definitely pretty badass in its own right.
I'll just be honest and say hearing "slamfire" makes me perk up. The trench shotty is the most iconic shotgun and I love it.
It actually helps a ton if a person is pumped up on adrenaline and loses fine motor skills. Not having to time the release and pull of the trigger is a huge benefit.
I have a rare Model 12 Heavy duck that does it and I love it
@@hughgrection3052 Have one too. Does yours have the ribbed Simmons barrel or the ribbed factory barrel?
Mine sadly does not have a rib, bought it at a random pawn shop for $650 a few years ago, and funnily enough they actually had 3 of them on the shelves.
Looking back I should've also bought the Ithaca M37 that was on the shelves too, but I didn't wanna miss a car payment.
@RZeppelin Mine is actually the even more rare model with the solid rib on top. Its a shame someone cut it down. But it's also what caught my eye on it when it was on the shelf. The typical standard Model 12 has the long sort of ugly barrel look. This one tho had the cool riot gun look to it. I payed just 450 for it. They're the hands down best combat shotguns even till this very day. It even cycles mini shells with no need for an adapter. Beautiful gun tho with lots of heavy wear on it and character.
I too would like to own an Ithaca in the same riot setup or trench. I'm not sure how I feel yet about the downwards ejection tho. Seems like a slip and trip hazard indoors on hard floors to eject cases there. They're crazy cool too tho.
I wish a company would make modern tactical furniture for the Model 12s tho. I'd buy up them all of so and cut them down and turn them into little beasts.
Does yours have the red stock rubber pad?
@@RedZeppelinAirship Since yours has no rib tho ya may be able to mount a heatshield on yours tho?
@@hughgrection3052 My Model 12 3IN is a full 32 Inch long barrel, and I don't intend on cutting it down because it is completely original with a very good B+ blued finish.
If I ever found one already at 18IN mark I would purchase it in a heartbeat (so long as it isn't more then $600) or if I got one that was in very poor condition and I could look past the surface condition to cut it down to 18 or 20 inches.
Mine has the original red rubber butt pad too, and it still is in a moderately rubbery feel and isn't hard as a rock.
Too bad Norinco is banned in the USA, I would love to get one of their 1897 clones, they are around $350 in Canada and can slamfire. Thats only time I would ever wish to be Canadian is for their Norinco imports, like the type 81 or their cheap shotguns.
I found one of these disassembled mostly complete in a cabinet that was in my grandpa’s garage. I reassembled it as much as I could but I’ll have to buy some parts to complete it. It will be a wall hanger. The production date is 1913. Pretty cool, I think.
Man, the one you reviewed is in FANTASTIC condition for being almost a century old! It's always wonderful to see such TLC into preserving a piece of history. I can just picture a young American GI death-gripping that gun from within his trench, waiting for the signal to go over the top. Amazing.
A friend’s neighbor picked one up at a show, got to hold that beast. $5k back in 2012 or so.
Working for a large outdoor retailer as a Gun Vault Specialist, I got to accompany our Used Gun Lead on an offsite appraisal and purchase. Most of the guns were older hunting guns, but a few caught my eye. There was a chromed M1886 Mannlicher with Chilean export marks. I thought it was an M1888 at first, but educated myself while he was meticulously examining the other guns. There was also a Khyber Pass Martini-Enfield copy that we had to pass on due to safety issues. I honed in on three of the guns: an 1897, 1892, and an M1 Carbine with a cheesy looking stock.
The 1897 is an original Riot version (but not the military Trench Gun, lacking the heat shield and bayonet lug). The serial number puts it at an 1899 production.
The 1892 is chambered in .38 WCF and its serial number puts it as 1894 production.
The M1 is an Inland manufactured one, made in late 1941 or early 1942, and the stock turned out to be an original 1960s Owens wire stock, as seen in one of the photos of the Symbionese Liberation Army.
Still had 1897s in the arms rooms of the 327th Infantry when I served in the 1980s.
same in the berlin brigde
4/502 swift strike
This is the one weapon that everyone would love to have, myself included
When I was a kid my uncle came home one day carrying an original 1897 trench gun that he later sold to a museum.
“Bird shot wouldn’t have been effective”
Ian just shattered the hearts of Fudds everywhere
Fudds are the ones that have always been using these shotguns. Nowadays all the tacticool kids think the AR is the answer to whatever question is being asked.
@@brivas3343, That's because the AR is the answer in most cases. Lightweight, very accurate, low recoil and high ammo capacity plus lower penetration inside a home, makes it a good choice for home defense. Not to mention the plethora of accessories like weapon mounted lights, suppressors, etc. make it a good choice. Nothing wrong, inherently, with a shotgun for close range work, but an AR is usually a better choice. BTW, lest you think I'm a "tacticool kid" I'm 63 years old.
@@mikebaggott7802 How to say you're tacticool without saying you're tacticool.
@@brivas3343 Try proving him wrong. You'll have a rough time.
Army vet here. My dad have his rock island armory AR shotgun with a 50 round drum loaded with nothing but birdshot which he swears up and down it will rip an attacker to shreds much worse than 00 buck....shit makes me cringe. My 590a1 is plum full of 00 buck. He thinks I'm wrong....smh
US Army: “Shotguns are compact enough to be easily wielded in the tenches.”
Also US Army: *Adds 15 inch-long bayonet*
Make it long enough and you don't even have to get out of the trench to stab people on the other side
@@moosemaimerAh, the M91/30 approach.
Man, your old 1897 trench gun video, where you were in uniform and bashing the germans for their complaints about the trench gun, is one of those videos I still go back to. This is the better historical/informational video, but the other one is just American as hell and absolutely funny.
Amerikanisch = Kriegsverbrechen
Sehr treffend formuliert.
Well the Germans were a bunch of hypocrites because they used things like mustard gas, and were allied with the Ottomans who were responsible for the Armenian Genocide.
Why do you not write the fact, that between 1815 and long into 1980s, no shotguns had been used as service weapon. Only in 1830s/ 1840s few of southern german states bought a small number of percussion side by side shotguns. They had been sometimes handed to the up to 1890s/1900s only saberarmed policemen, mostly when fighting poachery, or escort a large number of prisoners to a prison.
The 19th/20th century german/austrian counterpart to US Wild West literature had been novels, in which either a Forrest Service official ( Förster) or a lawfull licenced huntsman fights poachers , smugglers or other criminals in the Woods. The heroic characters are armed with rifles, while shotguns, when appearing, had been the weapons of the criminals.
Perhaps you now understand, that german soldiers of wwl saw shotguns not as service weapons, but as weapons, used by criminals, so the shotgun armed US soldiers, other ones don' t used them, as criminals.
@@brittakriep2938 And using mustard gas and flamethrowers is somehow better?
@@brittakriep2938 Well maybe you can understand how that DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. The U.S. came into war to end the bullshit, not to kowtow to the same fucking people who had no problem starting a World War in the first place.
When I was an MP at Fort Bragg in the late 1990s, we still had these, including bayonets(!) - in the Arms Room for "Riot Control." But... we never took them out for qualification. But they sure were cool to look at!
I mean, this was shortly after the government actually had to deploy the Marines to put down rioting in L.A.
Also, most angry mobs are not even going to try and charge a bayonet line.
Riot control used to mean firing light birdshot loads at people’s legs to encourage them to disperse.
picture a guy on guard duty at the entry gate hoiding that while an MP talks to the driver.........instant compliance....
The whole 'slam fire' thing can actually serve as an interesting way to prevent malfunctions. Compared to semiauto guns, pump guns have a strict rhythm of pushing the pump forward, then pulling it backward, then pulling the trigger. Slamfiring not only removes a step from that process, but allows you to avoid the order-of-operations issue that can lead to ejecting live rounds or even short stroking. You could argue that it's just a substitute for proper training, but combined with the faster fire rate, I think the package does give you some interesting capabilities.
Yeah, it's a side effect of a solution to the much bigger problem of ensuring the gun can only fire in battery. The AK-47's battery sear is basically the same, but with barrel gas doing the pumping.
Yeah training could negate the problem, but it’s still more user friendly.
Either way these things are so cool. We all need one
I just bought a long barrel version of this shotgun. Mine was made in 1923. Not military and no bayonet but in beautiful condition.
Trench sweeper go *boom
This is a must have gun for me. Currently saving up for one
My father owns a full size civilian model 1897 and it’s hands down my favorite shotgun I’ve ever fired
That bayonet mount was also special because it could be used as a secondary grip just for cqb. Imagine holding it like a pugil stick or staff weapon, one hand on the back and one up front, allowing you to swing and strike with the buttplate, slash and stab with the bayonet and use the body of the rifle to parry and block. I can see it being most effective in close quarters situations.
Dont forget using the bayonet mount as brass knuckles.
Not gonna lie, this sounds like some fudd lore...
This was a terrific presentation. I feel like there should be an Ithaca Model 37 as used in Vietnam video, as well. Just, uh.. just puttin' that out there.
When I was a rookie cop we had shotguns capable of slam fire. We were taught that, when you shove the slide forward shove it at the target and you would hit the target! I was surprised how effective it was. We all were sad to see our slam fire shotgun get traded in on newer shotguns without slam fire capability. But the insurance companies and city attorneys insisted on it even though we never had a bad shooting from a slam fire!
Ah Ithaca shotguns. So much fun. So easy to do something stupid. 😁
Just because you never had a problem doesn't mean you never would've.
@@LexYeen Decades ago I paid next to nothing for an Ithaca 37. Could never get *MY* timing right. Got too used to keeping my finger on the trigger. Figured that eventually I'd do something stupid.
Better that they insist on it *before* a bystander dies than after.
Yeah, the competence of many officers in the current generation has dropped so low that even with good training they still chronically do stupid things, getting themselves in trouble and others hurt. Having the slam fire is great for well trained and self-regulated people, we are just running dangerously low on said individuals.
The 1897 has to be the prettiest shotgun. It is definitely one of the best looking guns in general.
I have a bayonet that is said to go with a Mossberg shotgun. It resembles the Israeli Mauser 9" bayonet
In the "old West", shotbuns were used about as much as pistols in gunfights. Especially by "Doc" Holiday
>shotbun
Didn't Iced Clantbun usually pair well with Johnnynut Ring-Ohs for part of a complete Curly Bill Breakfast?
This group should get the award for the most creative use of a typo: It's WAYYY out of control!!! :) OK corral them all
*Doc Holiday Twerking foes to death*
I cannot be alone in the belief that more guns should also have swords on them.
Shotguns might hold 5 rounds, and be slow to fire, but they scare the hell out of everyone on the other end of it.
They fire far faster than a bolt action even without using slam fire . Loading takes more time, of course.
This is the pride and joy of my uncles shotgun collection. He got his from my grandpa's dad.
Just a magnificent beast of a firearm.
I have a history degree with emphasis in WWI and have always obsessed over owning a Winchester 1897! However, considering their rarity and price, I opted for a Mossberg 590 Retrograde.
I love it for its classic "trench gun" look. Wood stock, heatshield, bayonet lug, etc.. Just can't slam-fire, which I'm okay with. I threw an M7 bayonet, reproduction WWI leather sling, and a reproduction WWI ammo pouch, to compensate lol
Would still love to win this Winchester 1897 though!
My battalion in West Berlin mid-1980s had four Winchester 12-gauge military shotguns intended for ammunition guards.They tended to never leave the Headquarters Company arms room. Having fallen in love with them after shooting one at Rose Range next the Wannsea, I asked to be issued one for alerts and exercises. They still used the M1917 bayonet. Loved the weapon, and its uniqueness sent a message. Had a faux terrorist meant to test my command post's security set off his bomb when he saw me charge with the weapon, killing himself, me and the door guard, but the CP continued to manage the battle.
The 728th MP BN companies (552, 557, 57, 188) in Korea in the mid 1990's still had dozens of these in the arms room which were carried by the Korean Contract security guards. I wish that I knew more about the history of the weapons as I was inventorying them back then as it would have been neat to see if any were WWI vintage. I wonder if they were ever sent back to Anniston Army depot, and if they would ever be available through the CMP
You write very well for a dead man.
A "faux" terrorist that sets off a suicide attack? What's faux about that o.O
@HessianLikeTheFabric , it was part of the exercise play. It was a Soldier pretending to be a terrorist pretending to be a Soldier wearing the wrong headgear holding a briefcase bomb.
@@edwardloomis887 Ah, my bad, I missed the exercise part, that ofc makes a lot more sense. Sorry for the misunderstanding
I actually found and bought one a few weeks ago. It's missing the heat shield and bayonet but everything else is original. Beautiful gun. The store also had a model 12 as well but I was more interested in the 1897.
My brother has a ww2 model. I have 6 model 97 Winchester in both 12 and 16 gauges. Not all are in working condition. But several are. Great all around weapons.
6? Wow
The 1897 Trench Gun is my go to meme whenever something can be solved with a lot of judiciously applied firepower. Things like Huge Spiders, Coconut Crabs, eerie videos showing something weird and scary.
You may call me a Fudd, but between the M1 Garand, the 1911 and the 1897, you may not pack the latest and tactical supremacy, but you can bring a lot of impressive kaboom to an argument.
I found out about the 1897 Trench Gun some years ago when my gunsmith had his out on the bench for routine maintenance. On first examination, I thought it a funky, clunky item until he told us that you could “fan it”. He had to explain what that meant - the concept of a pump-action being “fanned” took a certain amount of grasping. Coincidentally, soon after, one of the guys in the club pulled a Norinco 1897 out of his truck after the formal business of the day was finished. He asked if anyone wanted to try it out. Ha, ha, ha. I volunteered.
We walked down the range a bit and I fed a few shells into the mag tube. I caught the eye of my friend who had been at the tutorial from our gunsmith. He nodded.
I pointed the gun down range and fired, being careful not to release the trigger. I looked at my friend again. He nodded again. He also grinned.
I emptied the magazine. It did not take long. I showed clear and turned around. A variety of expressions showed on the faces present, primarily surprise or disbelief. I handed the gun back to the owner (his expression was horror) and thanked him. I got the feeling that my friend and I were the only ones present that knew an 1897 Winchester could do that.
@thegoldencaulk2742 is correct. Unforgettable is the right word.
I have a Norinco clone of the 1897 Trench, it's got some nice benefits, namely it's set up for modern shells out of the box, but you still get the raw joy of an 1897 without paying out a stupid amount for an actual historical piece, or finding an 1897 fowling gun and having it converted. Honestly words cannot describe how damn fun my Trench gun is. I love that damn thing.
I have one too......and you are right, it is lots of fun.......it's excactly like this one, but new.....have shot it quite a bit.....and like the original it is very reliable.....only downside for me is country of manufacturing.....
My brothers and I will be handed down an M1897 from my great grandfather, grandfather and eventually, my father. It was made in I believe 1916, if I remember correctly. It is a hunting '97, not the trench version, though. Still a really fun shotgun.
I've seen footage from the Vietnam War with the 97 in use . Love the Winnie !
I've always wanted one just for the external hammer design. I don't care about the slamfire. The heat shield and bayonet lug would always be a welcome bonus.
Forgotten weapons presents: the most well remembered weapon
Living (as always) vicariously through your experiences, Ian! I'd love one of these and always had a bit of a fascination for them. Cheers again for all you do.
My ex father-in-law had his father's model 1897, commercial version of course. I still used it for duck hunting, back in the late 80s
a gun so legendary that a meme 100 years later was created where the Germans view it as a weapon of mass destruction, worse than mustard gas.
Yeah. Don't get me wrong, they're crazy badass weapons.
IMO tho one has to consider the context of the era they was used tho. These are in no way better than a more reliable, stronger and more accurate rifle.
But... this was when a single messenger pigeon being let loose by the enemy could spell disaster for your forces if it was able to escape. So they would hand out tons of shotguns to use more for the birds, but also kill at close range effectively when needed.
The fact they had so many around made up for the fact they used buckshot instead of birdshot.
If not for the bird aspect, they would have skipped these totally. Which is exactly what happened eventually for what should be obvious reasons.
People tend to think they was used because of how effective they was vs Germans. That just isn't the case.
Rifles did that better and was reloaded quicker too.
But, I own a rare Model 12 Heavy duck and love it to death. It was sawed off to 18 inches and has the rare ability to fire 3 inch shells instead of just 2 3/4 shells.
You'd think at least Ian would know they wasn't there for reasons most people assume and mention that.
But, regardless they're awesome as hell guns. I love the flaming bomb too. The slamfire is alot more useful than he said also. It prevent a soldier who's amped on adrenaline from messing up the fire sequencing of not releasing then pulling the trigger in the right orders. So it made them much more effective.
Great guns. A trench is on my bucket list for sure
@@hughgrection3052 and here I was just telling a joke
It's widely misunderstood today - the Germans didn't seriously think the protest was going to achieve anything but it was the latest stage in an ongoing tit-for-tat between the Entente and Central powers about who was the most barbaric. First the Brits complained about German "butcher blades" then the Germans complained about British "dum-dum bullets" then the Brits complained about gas so the Germans complained about mining and so on. No one expected it to make any difference on the battlefield - it was all propaganda meant to rile up the domestic audience.
@frenchfrey65 And here I was saying why they are legendary to the point of a meme.
What a coinkdink.
All the laughter and sheer humor must have affected my reasoning.
By all means, proceed with the thing that is maximum humor and the merry making that you do so well, that I so rudely interrupted.
My apolgies....😉
@@hughgrection3052The trench gun serves the same purpose as a submachine gun. Each pellet is ballistically equivalent to a 9mm pistol bullet.
The US army never ordered or issued bird shot loads for them - only buckshot (in cardboard and later full brass cartridges (the brass cartridges arrived too late for WW1 but were used widely in WW2)).
I came across a variant of the 1897 trench guns in a civilian DOD security guard arms room circa 2001. They even had the bayonets. Beautiful gun and it had been well maintained. If smart phones had existed I'd have taken a photo.
*germans complain about shotguns*
*the French guy who got toasted by a flame thrower and the British guy who got caught in a gas cloud* - “bruh” 💀
I remember seeing an MP pulling guard duty with this shotgun at an on-post Bank at Fort Bragg in 1980. It was still a hell of a weapon then, and still is today.
Surely the British antipathy towards using shotguns on the battlefield was more likely born of a reluctance to use a Gentleman's fowling piece on mere Germans.
I love how Germany was like “ban this shit NOW” when they were using shit like flamethrowers and gas lmao😭
It's fascinating to learn about the Winchester 1897 Trench Gun's role in WW1 and how it evolved to suit various combat conditions. The versatility and adaptability of firearms during that era truly showcased American ingenuity in weaponry. Thanks for sharing this historical perspective on firearms in World War I
"You can't shoot me with that cruel and inhuman shotgun.... but you're fine to stab me multiple times with that bayonet.
One of the finest shotguns ever made.
I was an MP in the early 70s. We are all kinds of shotguns in the armory. We even carried them on patrol in the car. My favorite was the 1897 which we still had. I liked it because the external hammer you could carry safely with a round in the chamber and hammer on half cock.
Now THIS is a home defense gun.
Bad Guy: *stumbles around living room in the dark*
Me: "FIX BAYONETS!" *clack-clack*
"We had to put the bayonet down low so we can stab the throat and blow the face simultaneously"
Ah yes, the gun that won WW1 according to Reddit.
saw it on the internet.. has to be true..
Reddit is the modern version of a gathering of medieval peasants exchanging stories that are totally true.
@@AdamantLightLP that’s not true.
medieval peasants are far more hygienic.
I personally just bought an 1897 Tench gun built in 1907. It has a 28” barrel. No clue about it’s history but for 116 years old it’s in pretty good shape.
Also from the Revolution to the US Civil War, Americans were loading their smoothbore muskets with buck-and-ball loads, so the idea of combat buckshot goes all the way back to the beginning for America.
First gun that required a nerf
Ive always wanted on of these since I first saw it in WaW 15 years ago. Its like a Faberge egg, just looks so aesthetic.
Honestly they look a little bit better when they have some wear on them. Just my opinion but I like when it looks like it just won two world wars
Best looking "war crime" ever used
I have a Norinco short 1897 copy and I’ve always wanted to fit it with a heat shield, but every one for sale says they don’t fit the Norinco guns.
Super fun shotgun, my go to out of the several I own. Despite being short the recoil isn’t bad due to the weight, but it isn’t even that heavy.
p sure they'd fit anyway, it's just clamp-on
just be sure the gun is long enough to accommodate the heat shield ig
I had the same issues with repro heat shields. If you find an original one they fit perfect.
Easy enough to grind (mini flap wheel) or shim with brass shim stock.
I recall Norinco used to sell its 1897 in the military trench gun configuration a few years ago, but I haven't seen any lately. The quality has apparently dropped a bit with the more recent clones.
Back in the early 80s, I had a classmate whose dad was a retired US Army Major who had a long barreled M1897 - a very cool piece. Though I do prefer the Riot/Trench version!
"Slam-fire" might not be prudent or more effective in a combat situation, but on the back 40, it certainly is FUN!
There’s still some Norinco clones around in Canada, they were reasonably priced too at around $350. Quality was decent and they could be slam fired like the original.
We were still using Winchester pump shotguns in the Army in the 1980s.
Imagine if someone made a cleaver bayonet attachment and essentially turn the shotgun into a battle-axe.
Imagine someone getting dumber from having just read that.
Shotgun is already a battle axe dummy. Turn a tree into pulp quicker than an ace in Paul Bunyans hands
I can’t think of a better home defense gun with the exception of needing a shorter bayonet
I was the unit armorer for the 410th MO Company at Ft. Hood, TX in 1976. I was signed for 170 of newer winchester shotguns. Amoung other cool things.
Thanks for the recommendation.
You're right about that, myself and my family never went that route when purchasing firearms, but I've seen people who have.
I was looking at that, and yes, the Type 81 is still classified as non restricted because it's closer to the SKS than an AK "varient", it's just expensive ($1,300 CDN)
I'm sorry for your experience but from what people have told me, they've never had experiences like that at gun stores.
In Canada, gun safety is part of your course to get your firearms licence which is legally required to purchase firearms, along with a three day waiting period for handguns and certain other guns (restricted)
That was the first thing our instructor said in our possession and accusation course (PAL) always control the muzzle direction and never use your scope, use binoculars. We also have a specific hunter safety course that's required to get your license to hunt.
Its funny that Germany would protest the shotgun considering that they were the ones that first brought poison gas and flamethrowers to the battle field.
Never trust a hypocrite
"Hey, it may be a gallon of burning petroleum jelly, but at least it's not a dum-dum bullet, right?"
Gotta clear pillboxes somehow
Bleibt trotzdem ein Kriegsverbrechen ihr Tiere.
C&Rsenal also did a in-depth look to this iconic shotgun with Mae shooting it and their thoughts about it. Check that episode out if you want to get into the history of it.
I believe the 3-screw clamp was still not enough to resist movement under recoil, so the screw holes in the adapter were drilled for a slight interference fit with the barrel. The barrel then had three slight cross-wise 'troughs' cut into them to match the screws for a mechanical, as well as a friction, lock.
The first "it's never a war crime the first time" weapon.
its still not a war crime..
Ah, a man of culture as well.
Demonstrably not.
that bayonet is the most outstanding blade i've ever seen!
Pershing would have crapped his pants if he had seen the AA-12. ^-^
Man, a trench gun with a bayonet is about as an intemidateing weapon as you get
Other trench shotguns too can join in the fun.
Flame throwers with bayonets
@@donnieweston3249 Dont give the Japanese ideas!
@@donnieweston3249 Chesty Puller made a similar quip when he saw a flamethrower for the first time. "Where the Hell do you put the bayonet?"
I was a Georgia deputy sheriff in the 70's-90's. I carried one of these, sans bayonet (but I did HAVE one) for years. My other "long" gun was a 1928 Thompson. I worked 3rd shift by myself for years. My "back up" was that 1897 made in 1927 and that 1928 made in 1935. If either one of those came out of the car, no one wanted play. Two burglars who had shot at law enforcement in other counties said they would not commit crimes in our county. Why? "That 3rd shift deputy is CRAZY!" I took that as high compliment. Unfortunately, I lost both of them in a tragic "boating accident" years ago.
Look, if some Yankee came in charging over the wire and blasting Fritz and Hans with a shotgun before gutting me with his bayonet, I'd be one Sour Kraut, too.
My father had an 1897 12 gauge takedown model. That was one fantastic shotgun!
There were probably a few reasons why other forces didn't field shotguns in WWI. One was concern that they didn't meet the laws of war. There was an Australian officer on Gallipoli in 1915, a Boer War veteran named Stephen Midgely DSO, who used a sawn-off double on trench raids:
" The “Old Bird” is a holy terror in these raids. He’s only an exceptionally small chap and no youth either, but he is about the most murderous old devil in the regiment. He leads these raids with a hell of a yell as he jumps down into the trench, blazing to the right and left with a sawn-off shotgun. An ordinary service revolver is no good for him.”
At least one of his fellow officers also used the shotgun for the same purpose, before Midgely was ordered to put it away by the brass, on the basis apparently that it wasn't quite the thing. I think the Turks may also have had something to say about it.
Given that trenches were also cleared with trench mortars and jam-tin bombs (improvised grenades) in the same campaign it hardly seems to make sense.
"Wasn't quite the thing" sounds more than a little bit of an "officers are all of the opinion that war ought to be a gentlemanly sport" thing than anything else. Anybody who had to actually jump into a trench would not have hesitated to take one of these over a service revolver every single time, 10 out of 10, no exceptions.
@@dananderson6697 "it's just not cricket you know"
@@colonelfustercluck486 Exactly. "Bad form, wot?"
The interaction with the Army officer is 100% believable, especially the response given to him. I have had very similar conversations while in the service and currently in the private sector with Army officers…
This gun is iconic and a looker.
my son Ethan got one of these, fully functional, off a friend needing money, for the closeout price of $250... 2 years ago.
Mine was built in 1907, runs like a charm....despite the age , I think Ill keep it!
The shotgun I mean, not my son...he is a newer model....🤭
We had one come through the store I worked at. It had the US flaming bomb on the receiver. But one of the previous owners had ground off the bayonet lug and removed the head shield
“This…is my BOOMSTICK!!!”
- Ash Williams
for those who don't know, you DO NOT have to purchase ANYTHING in order to win the trench gun! all US based prize giveaways like this one are required by law to have a method of entering to with WITHOUT purchase of anything. You will often hear "no purchase necessary to win" at the end of TV ads for giveaways for this reason. The method for free entry is generally extremely annoying and extremely specific with many steps, but by law it has to exist. This also applies to things like the McDonalds Monopoly game lol. i used to enter all sorts of giveaways by mailing in, but it truly is extremely annoying an time consuming. Purchasing just gives you what is legally called an "automatic entry". You are paying to not be annoyed by your entry method
I think they made it slamfire because boomstick+slamfire=fun 😂
One of my favorite firearms of all time
The German did not protest against the use of shotguns, they protest against the use of full lead buckshots which can be considered as expansive ammo. Those ammunitions are forbidden under the 1899 Hague declaration.
One of the most brutally tacticool weapons ever contrived.