Guns That Killed Racists (feat. InRangeTV)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 сен 2024
- With the help of Karl of @InrangeTv, I test fire and explore the history behind five iconic long guns of the United States Army during the American Civil War, including three original pieces which were actually used in combat between 1861 and 1865.
Support Atun-Shei Films on Patreon ► / atunsheifilms
Leave a Tip via Paypal ► www.paypal.me/...
Buy Merch ► teespring.com/...
Official Website ► www.atunsheifi...
Original Music by Dillon DeRosa ► dillonderosa.com/
~REFERENCES~
[1] "The Main Arsenal" (2021). Springfield Armory National Historical Park www.nps.gov/sp...
[2] Michael S. Raber. “Conservative Innovators, Military Small Arms, and Industrial History at Springfield Armory, 1794-1918.” IA. The Journal of the Society for Industrial Archeology 14, no. 1 (1988): 1-22. www.jstor.org/s....
[3] Richard Carlile. “Carbines of the Union Cavalry.” Military Images 7, no. 5 (1986): 16-25. www.jstor.org/s....
[4] John D. McAuley. Carbines of the Civil War (1981). Pioneer Press, Page 7-8
[5] Augustus Woodbury. Major General Ambrose E. Burnside and the Ninth Army Corps (1867). S.S. Rider and Brother Publishers, Page 8
[6] Jacob D. Cox. The Battle of Franklin, Tennessee: A Monograph (1897). Charles Schribner’s Sons, Page 217-218
[7] Frank Aretas Haskell. The Battle of Gettysburg (E-Book Published 2010). Project Gutenberg www.gutenberg....
"Extract the cartridge. Remove and extract the cartridge. Extra- EXTRACT THE CARTRIDGE."
Mfw he doesnt extract the cartridge
“Billy Yank you blithering idiot!”
Atun Shei will be having nightmares about Karl saying that
Reminds me of Colonel Shaw in Glory: “Faster… faster… FASTER!”
@@I-like-history He has PTSD now.
Billy Yank never died, he just started living in the desert and made gun videos.
Arizona specifically: Those cacti are saguaros and only found in the Sonoran in Arizona/Sonora.
@@Wasserkaktus that is cool
@@Wasserkaktusthank you desert specialist
He reincarnated like the Doctor
Actually both him and Johnny Reb are Time Lords, that explains how they both lived in the present day and yet had memories of being in the Civil War itself
@@randomjunkohyeah1 technically they are both different regenerations of the same time lord stuck in an eternal time paradox where only one can be just while the other lives
Been having the recent privilege of diving through the archives in Washington D.C., a pretty damning report on the Gallagher Carbine from the CO of the 2nd Tennessee (Union) Cavalry who unfortunately was issued with 589, reported:
"The Carbine now in use by the Regt. Gallagher's Patent, are a very imperfect and inefficient arm and are totally unfit for service particularly against the Enfield Rifle of the enemy"
A Captain from what is called the 1st (Union) Mississippi (presumably the mounted rifles) was more succinct, writing of it simply:
"Utterly worthless"
Ha nice👍✌️
It's the worst rated carbine of the ACW, aside from the Gibbs and Cosmopolitan (The gun with like 25 names). The Hall too was called "Poor to worthless" by 22 field officers in the 1863-64 survey by the Ordinance Department. There was an excuse though - these Halls were made way back in the late 30s and early 40s, they were as old as many of the officers filling out the surveys!
I actually have an OG Gallagher. "Worthless" is generous.
@@theprojectproject01 Yeah I can believe it. Forget gas seal, if your breech loading rifle design requires to you wrench out a hot cartridge that doesn't want to come out it nullifies any other factors
@@SStupendous Like... I see what Gallagher was driving toward, what the end goal was. It's not a big jump from the carbine to an H&R single-shot. But the "form factor" of the rimmed, brass cartridge wasn't developed yet, and so neither was the idea of an extractor.
Andy and Karl out in the Desert and with a title like that? They’re about to break Jesse out of meth slavery.
Breaking Bad if it was good
@@mattmcdonough3282 Breaking Bad IS GOOD.
@@mattmcdonough3282 Breaking Good.
pop a little black pill,
and you're Way Out West
@@mattmcdonough3282Breaking Bad if it was even better
“Overly lubricated and small in diameter” loool
Hey! Stop that!
“Seats much easier” 🥵
Very cheap shot, but very well done.
I'm sure you could get at least a halfway convincing apology tor the mean but accurate thing he said...
@@Charles_Gunhaver 😏
Next video in this series should be : The Guns that Killed Racists in the 1940s.
And who was the racist?
So...SVT-40, Hanyang 88, Chang Kai-Shek rifle, Lee-Enfield, MAS-36, and Mosin-Nagant?
@@darrinrentruc6614 ADOLF HITLER
@@darrinrentruc6614Guess who
So basically every gun in WW2 LOL
"Does the confederacy have easier to use cartridge boxes, cause I'm thinking of defecting" that really cracked me up 😂
He's defective, such a shame
Johnny Reb origin story
timestamp is 18:56 for anyone who wants that
Many confederates didn’t even have cartridge boxes
@@TaxConsumer There's about 2 million war related photos and most of them are portraits. It's hard to find many photos of soldiers who didn't even have cartridge boxes, it's not like most men used powder flasks or their pockets.
i love InRange basically going Drill Sergeant on our boy while he desperately tries to pull the cartridge out of the Gallager lmfao.
"Extract and retain the cartridge. EXTRACT AND RETAIN TH- Extract the cartridge- get the cartridge out- you need to get that out, you have to reload- remove the cartridge. REMOVE THE CARTRIDGE. Okay- FORGET IT! Reload." - 8:58
i felt like i was dissapointing my father, and i wasnt even the one being yelled at.
Firearms are just a sign of a insecure guy with a small peepee
I thought the same thing. Brought back memories of basic training going to the range for the first time.
Well, the Gallager rifle honestly...doesn't look like a good weapon.
Flashbacks
As an African American let me just say that message at the end revolving around Gun culture and its impact in not just America itself, but the people in question using these tools I applaud both you and @InRangeTV. Guns are part of the African American identity. Many of my ancestors were sold off to slave via trading guns to African tribes. From then on black Americans of multiple generations saw guns for their power and importance, especially in our freedoms. Slave revolts and maroon communities all over the south were some of the first demonstrations of black liberation pre civil war. Guns confiscated from slave raids were associated with high importance as it can turn the tide of a slave and a freedom fighter. Then the civil war in question as black Americans fact discrimination on both sides to liberate all of us the accepted the tools of destruction with honor. Post civil war the gun was still a valuable tool that in a time up until the civil rights movement that was littered in black towns massacred, people hung and torched, and many other atrocities. All throughout that time black communities took arms which lead to the black power movement of the late 60s and 70s defining what the second amendment means for all not just white Americans. As we still have gun debates in current generations and how it is still unfair for black gun users in a lot of situations to use their arms without discrimination people like you continue to educate the importance of gun history that affects all Americans and not just gloss over these defining wars like a cheap high school revision paper.
@@RollsCanardly-fv9ksthis man put out a well thought out comment putting forth his views and thoughts on a serious topic, and you respond with an unfunny shitpost. Shame on you seriously
The "black power" movement of the 60's and 70's were a bunch of commies.
Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.
@@bosef1 Depends which gun. The fire lances are SO 1000 AD.
damn you got kinda owned huh
Judging by the tint this was recorded in Movie Mexico
Retrospect Movie Mexico
Almería in Andalusia, Spain?
In the Breaking Universe where two crystal meth sellers are also civil war reenactors. (They hate the neo-nazis)
Hola gente
For a second I thought my monitor was going bad
Burnside's ice cream cone reminds me a lot of how basically every modern cartridge is some degree of tapered because a cone is easier to extract than a full cylinder. Obviously this one is to a far greater extent, and that might be an ease of use thing. Gotta hand it to Burnside, that's a really clever design
gotta fucking love the civ 5 ironclad pfp
@@fishhhhhhhed Ikr
Ya know I just realized, I have hardly ever seen civil war nerds who are on the UNION side lol. But I was born in Arkansas so
@@Shlumbus69 imagine being on the slaver's side in any circumstance, cringe existence
I was born in New York…. I never thought a civil war nerd would be on the confederate side.
I mean… those guys shot at out guys
@@stephenandersen4625 yeah there's actually people in the south who think cause their great great granpappy fought for the Confederacy, they need to just have civil war autism about it. There are mfs who dead ass live and breathe the stars and bars. Honestly that's no better than waiving an Osama bin laden flag
@@ExtraThiccc Do you think reenactments happen with just one side?
@@hellishcyberdemon7112 No. However, he does make a point. There are people that are fervently on the Confederate Side during re-enactments...They make it part of their personality.
For those of you interested in the human element, there is a great book called “The Social History of the Machine Gun.” It’s exactly that. How people’s ideas about war and military service changed with the introduction of that weapon. Also the differing attitudes of various national militaries towards its adoption. It’s a fascinating book about the social feedback loop of a new technology.
Sounds cool! Thanks for the recc : )
How close in your opinion does this paraphrased account fit with the historical record? I find it amusing, but I am curious if it holds up.
"How DARE you sir! Never have I seen such a lacking display of cavalry spirit, to suggest that this illustrious regiment could be brought low by your toys! Dismount your horse sir and walk back to the barracks, as such a mode of locomotion clearly suits your infantry addled mind." - Paraphrased response of the Commanding General, 1st Cav Regiment, to a junior officer who'd been put in charge of the regiment's first machine gun section.
Another great bit of media about everyone suddenly coming to terms with the reality of machine guns is the Hardcore History podcast Word War 1 series "Blueprint for Armageddon".
Alas, it's no longer available for free, but it's definitely worth paying for.
Well, I am old. My Grandfather was TOO OLD FOR SERVICE in WW2. However, he was almost finished his advanced training, machinegun corp here in New Zealand, 19 years old, at the end of October 1918.
I got a lot of his things, as a child, when he passed away. A lot of books and I have his medals and his uniform badges. And in his books, he used to write comments in pencil on the edge of the page.
One book, a famous author talking about "The Empire" and how boys could wear the uniform of "The King" and he had written things in it IN PENCIL when he was a child, and when he came home, took a black pen and wrote on the fly leaf
"They will tell these lies to children, and send them to war to kill their brothers" and dated it.
that is why I was given the book by him, I can see now.
It's easy to overlook how significant the Machine-gun changed everything if you look at it from the officer or line-soldier of the day. British soldiers of the late 1800s and early 1900s still had "Volley sights" on their rifle. you'd line one notch up to a range well beyond what you could reasonably aim at (say 2500-3000 meters away) and use the rear sight to basically arc fire your rifle like an archer or a howitzer piece. The principle was you'd have 50-60 guys in a section laying down a volley like archers of old only at even greater distances and sure, you probably wouldn't hit anything on average but the guy down range doesn't know that. All he knows is "Oh shit, i'm being shot at".
The Machine-gun made that line of thinking obsolete but you can still find those volley sights on old British/Commonwealth guns of the era.
The background at the table literally looks like a painted 1940's film background lol
You can point a camera pretty much anywhere out here and it looks like an Old West movie set
If they wanted to make it look like a real Western they would have to go to Italy
@@knightshousegamesand Hungary! Don't discount my goulash brethren XD
That's just Southern Arizona bro.
@@nasonguy ok
"Gettysburg, what an unbelievable battle that was. It was so much, and so interesting, and so vicious and horrible, and so beautiful in so many different ways--it represented such a big portion of the success of this country. Gettysburg, wow--I go to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, to look and to watch. And the statement of Robert E. Lee, who's no longer in favor--did you ever notice it? He's no longer in favor. 'Never fight uphill, me boys, never fight uphill.' They were fighting uphill, he said, 'Wow, that was a big mistake,' he lost his great general. 'Never fight uphill, me boys,' but it was too late." TFG,WTF
Oh by gods, I remember hearing this...
Like really, Robert "never fight uphill" Lee, the same guy who sent Pickett's firces into an uphill charge...
@@PobortzaPlDon’t forget Lee’s stupid frontal assault on Malvern Hill. Lee did not learn his lesson.
The only Confederate flag me and the homies like: 🏳️🏳️🏳️
The true confederate flag:
A white cross across a white background with white stars.
@@LucyBean42 no the correct one is 3 stripes of red and white and 13 stars in the canton
@@OceanChannelProductionsMURICA
@@OceanChannelProductions No, the correct flag of the south is 13 stripes alternating between red and white with a blue box in the corner containing 50 stars
I believe the most recent confederate flag was the white dish towel Lee surrendered with
Cool! They're in AZ! Wow!
Wait? They're in ARIZONA? In Daylight? DURING THE SUMMER!?
In those uniforms too..
@@I-like-historylocalized entirely within your kitchen‽
@@strawmanfallacy Can I see it?
For Andy's part atleast, I can assure you that those of us who are used to hot, humid ass southern summers actually kinda love y'all's hellish dry heat. Atleast out west we can breathe when it's hot, whereas down here the heat comes along with so much humidity that you feel like you're gonna drown just from walking outside.
@@themadmanchannel9036 No
Well researched and produced as always, but the discussion of the human element, the tragedy of violence, and how tech details can sanitize bloodshed took this over the top. Very well done
In all l my hearing and learning about the civil war, ive never considered the horses. That is a shattering image.
Ikr? At least the humans knew what they were getting into. Absolutely awful
@@AtunSheiFilmsTruly, may we never be taken for fools again.
@@AtunSheiFilms They didn't have John Wayne era stunt horses who just always just fell down...
On seeing a dog sitting by the body of its owner: "This soldier, I realized, must have had friends at home and in his regiment; yet he lay there deserted by all except his dog. I had looked on, unmoved, at battles which decided the future of nations. Tearless, I had given orders which brought death to thousands. Yet, here I was stirred, profoundly stirred, stirred to tears. And by what? By the grief of one dog." That was Napoleon, who was no stranger to mass casualties.
Animals hit different.
@@michaelwoodby5261 Ever watch that one episode of Chernobyl?
On the last quote - I was reminded of Wellington's comment after Waterloo: "Believe me, nothing except a battle lost can be half so melancholy as a battle won"
46 seconds in, civil war guns and a dune reference. This could potentially be the most perfect youtube video.
update: yes it was the perfect video.
Perfect dune impression, 10/10. No further notes.
Great video, love the InRange collab!
Listened to "Union Dixie" and "Marching through Georgia" to get into the right mindset for this video.
May I recomend the german song Heckerlied too, it's lyrics author emigrated to the US and served the Union during the first counter insurgency war.😉
Battle Hymn of the Republic time, boys!
Don't forget Union Dixie!
@@alexmath1579 ...he said that first??
Maybe he meant to include the union Dixie-trap remix lol @@AnimeSunglasses
I didn’t even watch it I just came to read the comments.
I assure you it’ll be interesting to see these vintage firearms tested and hear their backstories.
"General Sherman rewrote the entire fire code of Atlanta, and he never even filed a permit." -- The Well There's Your Problem Podcast.
It's a podcast, about engineering disasters, with slides.
@@loadeddice4696 that is in its self, a disaster
@@loadeddice4696 I do not respect fish /SovietAnthemDrop
Wait, what episode was that? I'd think I'd remember a line like that
Okay, so what's the Venn diagram on viewers of Atun-Shei, InRange, and WTYP? It's got to be a substantial overlap.
“Grant. Get Union Dixie. The TRAP Union Dixie.”
"Oh way down south in the land of traitors..."
@@overcastandhazerattlesnakes and alligators, ride away!
(Ride away!)
@@arandomkobold8403 Come away! (Come away!)
@@cjkelly7536ride away
Yall out there in full uniform in the Sonoran desert in the middle of summer? RIP in pepperonis Atun Shei and InRange
Dang, I honestly am looking at my brown bess as a british re-enactor and going "wow this is actually easier than some of the union guns"
Yeah but Brown Bess was smoothbore musket. Nothing like the range of the rifles.
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv even then lots of the combat took place at less than 200 yards so the advantage of the rifle wasn't as great as you'd think, not to mention the men got basically no live fire training and it wasn't uncommon for the first time a man fired his musket with a live round was in his first battle.
A rifled gun is still way more accurate at any range. An untrained shooter is going to have a much easier time hitting a target with a rifled barrel than a smooth bore. @Gustav000
@@RK-ej1to I didn't say they were equal just that the rifle doesn't offer as much of an advantage as you'd expect, the hit rate for smooth bores isn't that much less than a rifle and is actually greater if they're using buck and ball.
Also factor in battlefield conditions, black powder produces a large amount of smoke so after a few volleys both the shooter and target will be at least partially obscured making aimed fire difficult if not impossible.
And one more thing due to the high arc that is required for firing at range it is very important that the shooter accurately know the range to target otherwise the bullet will fly harmlessly over the targets head. For reference, when shooting at a target 500 yards away the bullet with peak at about 16 feet above the ground.
Yes if you have a good flint
(I have a Brown bess too)
I was not expecting a Dune reference, but I'm glad it's there.
😂😂 i caught that too
“Whether they were on the right side or the wrong side, everyone who died was someone’s son, or daughter, or husband…”
NGL. That hit way harder than I expected it would.
There's a graveyard on an island in Estonia. On one side are all the Russians who were cut off there in '41, listed on slabs on huge blocks over their shared graves. The rest of the field is simple stone markers for the graves of Germans who were cut off there in '44. At first, those graves don't look all that numerous, but some have four or five names per stone and I found one that simply said: "eight unknown German soldiers." In the middle of the field are upright slabs listing the German soldiers whose last known locations were somewhere on that island. Some of them are under stones bearing their names, but that's an awfully long list of mothers who never knew where to lay a flower.
@@goldenhawk352 Not everyone was "racist" during those times. That goes for Union and Confederacy.
@@goldenhawk352 But only one side was fighting to preserve a racist way of life. The “good people on both sides” argument doesn’t absolve those who fought for a morally bankrupt cause.
@@goldenhawk352 How about you explain why you think that question is in any way relevant?
@@goldenhawk352 Joining a government dedicated to the preservation of slavery doesn't count as immoral if you don't mention that part? FAIL. ⛔
I remember in a joint Q&A a few years ago Andrew said "I'm not *not* a gun person" in response to questions about gun collabs with InrangeTV. Nice to see this come to fruition!
Perfectly timed video, holy shit.
Bro was very, very early
how did you watch this before it came out😭😭
@@arandomuser2378patreon probs, it gives you early access to videos
Perfectly timed to what?
@@cameronnovy3718If ya know, ya know. If ya don't turn on the news.
I would go even further than you in your concluding statements, Atun-Shei. Not only does the mechanical obsession with military hardware sanitize any focus on the actual cost of war, I would argue that it often serves as a pipeline for people to fall into support of evil regimes and ideas. I can' tell you how many people I've seen who have formed an emotional connection to IJN Yamato or Bismarck or the Tiger tank or the T-72 and, as a result, start getting into arguments about how those tools could have been used *better* or how the regimes that used them could have *done better* so that their side would win, because these people get emotionally invested in that idea of their favorite equipment winning. And as they spiral deeper into that mindset, they get emotionally invested in the other trappings of the regime, and begin to dismiss criticisms of the regime because that feels like a criticism of their favorite machines.
Just today in a Facebook group I saw a guy post a meme about how if he had a time machine, he'd go back in time to "stop Hitler." Well, that's great, right? Oh wait, sorry, I forgot to include the rest: he would go back in time to "Stop Hitler from sending KMS Bismarck out on a suicide mission." Like, this dude literally wanted to go back in time and confront Hitler and tell him not to get Bismarck sunk. Not to, say, prevent the Holocaust or WW2, but to stop his favorite ship from getting destroyed. And it went even further in the comments, with people saying they'd go back in time and try to convince the Germans not to commit x, y and z mistakes that cost them the war. Not one of them seemed to stop for a second and consider what they were advocating for: a world where Nazi Germany *won WW2.* It was fucking insanity.
Yeah so many "military" historians are so obsessed with the material machines of war that they can come off as legitimate assholes who have extremely skewed priorities.
Would it be cool if the Bismarck was still afloat and able to be toured? Yeah.
Did that matter at the time? Fuck no. Sink the Bismarck.
Besides, the main reason that ship is so famous today is because of its sinking.
lol omg dood that’s so crazy 😴
Yes, many people enthusiastic about war games have a real love affair with ww2 german equipment. While the Yamato has been venerated in popular media, games and cartoons. I can understand people wanting to play out historical scenarios and to do better than whatever side they're playing originally fared, to think that they're smarter than General X, but the investment should be in the game itself- not in the history of it.
Also, you never hear people theory crafting an allied defense of Czechoslovakia, or playing France against the blitzkrieg, it's almost always Germany's failures to invade England or Russia or whatever other campaign. So it's not merely about winning a lost war, or loving an underdog, it's specifically about doing better with a specific nation which is on the wrong side of history.
@@leckercidre160 I do know some people who play germans in wargames will also verbally berate anyone who wants to play an SS unit. They not sure how much such a distinction matters in the end.
@@leckercidre160 Why is playing the SS "cool" exactly?
32:43 - OH MY GOD HE SAID IT. Finally. Atun Shei best gun youtuber. Best historical youtuber. FINALLY someone comes out and says it! this videogamey obsession with military technology and minutiae reduced to a tech-tree like spreadsheet of progression reduces people to numbers and mechanisms and gives birth to a mentality that fails to see the abomination of war. THANK YOU!
Inorite? ❤
How does appreciating warfare technology and utilizing data points intrinsically disallows the ability to comprehend the grim aspects of war?
@@CAL112100I am not sure anyone is saying that. I say this as someone who gets off on appreciating warfare technology and utilizing data points, etc., and absolutely loves playing videogames that happen to give an ahistorical, sanitized portrayal of war.
An appreciation is not the same as an obsession, at least not the kind of obsession I believe the OP is talking about.
It's an issue of interest honestly. I used to be that way but once the "cool" effect wore off as I entered my 20's, I took a better look.
It's still cool to me. But reducing it to numbers, tech trees, arrows on a map with symbols and names on a map doesn't reflect the realities of warfare. Horror is an inseperable part of warfare. No amount of jaunty political tunes and fun history changes that.
@@CAL112100 I think a visceral example would be the type who grow so obsessed with the German wunderwaffe weapons (or in milder cases, stuff like the Tiger II or Strumtiger), feats of engineering marvels that wound up being hindsight wasteful by a mad superpower who had been doing horrible things, and wonder how they could fall with such a technological advantage to manage the first jetplanes and so on. Those who unironically get latched onto the hype intended by these shows of force that it leans further into also viewing the nation involved as somehow better as well. Russia kinda had a similar view in some circles until the invasion of Ukraine either awoke them to just how bad Russia is at maintaining things, or alternatively making them double down into conspiracy madness. And to be equal opportunity, I'm sure there's weirdos here in the states that pull similar stuff with the aircraft carrier fleets or the F-35 or so on, and instead not simultaneously looking at how bad American social programs and infrastructure are getting while almost a third of our government funding is going to these military shows of force.
Of course, to be fair there were PLENTY of racists who wore blue; Sherman remained one well beyond the Civil War. But as Allen Guelzo put it in Voices from Gettysburg, the Northern armies "were not always the slaves' best friend, but they were slavery's deadliest enemy." And it's worth noting that many, MANY Yankees underwent a conversion experience the farther the northern armies pushed into the southern states and saw for themselves the horror of slavery and the humanity of the slaves.
It is foolish not to understand that the North owned slaves too and those were the ones that Lincoln did NOT "free" through the Proclamation.
Knew before I clicked that there'd be some triggered "both sides" nonsense in the comment section, and I was not disappointed, lmao.
always one of you people
you trying to both sides argument the civil war is so silly. some northerners were racist sure but they didn't leave the union and start a war over the inability to own another human
@@mike990this comment doesn’t read as ‘both sides’ at all. Recognizing the racism among the north is as natural as recognizing the racism that still exists in society and its systems today.
Both sides *were* racist. And still are.
Proud to say Burnside was also a Rhode Islander.
Also, focus on material culture in war may be why so many have tried to invent "the weapon so horrific as to end war" (the Gatling gun is period appropriate example) but have only made war more destructive. To quote General William T. Sherman, "War is hell."
OMG! You're in my state! Welcome to Arizona and to 111-degree weather!
I have a relative that served in the 98th Illinois Infantry Regiment which later became the 98th Regiment Illinois Volunteer Mounted Infantry. They used Spencer Rifles I've been told, not the Carbine variation.
Served under John T. Wilder during the Battle of Chickamauga. John J. Funkhouser commanded the 98th and the family is still around in our area with many locations named after.
Nice.
Interesting story: In a different regiment under Wilder during Hoover’s Gap, one dying soldier attempted to sabatoge his gun in his final moments to prevent it from being captured
@@theanimalguy7 always fun hearing say Funkhouser Road. 😂
Mounted infantry? Intriguing and confusing
@@jesseh.5223 aka Dragoons.
My takeaway from this video is that Lincoln could have shortened the war by two years by investing in Winchester rifle mass-production.
All we're missing is a surprise appearance by Esoterica! Love this!
Okay, this is worth showing my ignorance. I haven't found a crossover between Atun-Shei and Esoterica. Have they done a video/videos together, or are they linked in some other way? I'd love to see that.
@@SingularityOrbit ruclips.net/video/Fb5KfTW-GmQ/видео.html
@@SingularityOrbitEsoterica hosted Atun Shei for a tasting & discussion of Absinthe and Alester Crowley while in New Orleans (May 12, 2023 episode).
@@SingularityOrbitatun shei also made the worlds wickedwst man in the city of sin which is a crossover
@@drewgoin8849 Ah! There it is! Thank you very much!
As the descendant of a Pennsylvania Infantry Colonel & an Illinois Cavalry Sergeant, you’ve received my approval. 👍👍
One of my ancestors may have served under your Colonel forefather. He too was from Pennsylvania, & died at Gettysburg.
@@grantgarrod2232, was he in the 4th PA Cavalry or the 211th PA Infantry?
@@Thespian821, We only know that he was infantry. He'd come to the US from Canada with only his young son, & he left the boy in the care of a family of Pennsylvania Dutch farmers, & never returned, so the only details known are from the boy's memories. Some time later, a man visited the farm who had been his buddy & served in the regiment with him. He said he saw him shortly before they went into battle, but never after, so he'd hoped he'd been wounded & discharged, & came to see him. But since he hadn't returned, he was sure he'd died in the battle. The boy later ran away from the farm at fifteen , made his way to the Midwest, & became one of my forefathers.
"Ohhhhh wayyy down South in the land of Traitors!!! Rattlesnakes and Alligators!!!" 😂
Ride away! Come away!
@@rileywilsonepicarcher9995 Ride away, dixie land
@@rileywilsonepicarcher9995 Where cotton's king, and men are chattles. Union boys will win the battles.
t. Ellis Island runoff
@@leckercidre160 probably descendants of wealthy Northerners who bought their sons way out of service.
As somebody who found Andy through Karl before they had their first collaboration, this was very nice.
Karl looked so sad after you cut off his intro
Is the 1863 Spencer what the kids mean when they say "no cap"?
Lmao
Oh hell yeah, we're gettin' spoiled today!
Outstanding video with outstanding people 😁👍💚
Total frauds
@@hitman_s1 when an idiot makes that claim it's a huge compliment.
@@hitman_s1 Cry about it, terrorist.
@@hitman_s1 cry me a river
@@jamesferguson2353 Cry more
.Interesting FACT is that the Union allowed Slavery to exist well after the Confederacy surrendered. The Emancipation Proclamation was instituted immediately where Union Troops were occupying Confederate Territory. But the Emancipation SPECIFICALLY was applied ONLY to those States "in rebellion". Thus some Loyal Union slave states, like Kentucky and in de- facto Missouri, maintained slavery until the passage of the 13th Amendment in December 1865. And New York City was with New Orleans, widely considered the most Racist City in the Country. NYC in fact had the bloodiest Race and Draft riots in the Country DURING the Civil War.
A solid reminder that basically every one from the 19th century kinda sucked lol
PA heat is like desert heat except you're also in the middle of a wet forested area so everything is gross and humid. have fun! :D
Temperate Wetlands is shorthand for 'Swamp where it snows sometimes but still gets above 90 in the summer'.
Pennsylvania is great.
home sweet home
@@ObiwanNekody You think it would be cooler up in the mountains. But uhh.. nope! ;D
Fun fact: the guy who wrote the music to the Canadian national anthem was a French-Canadian guy named Calixa Lavallée who fought for the Union in the Fourth Rhode Island Regiment as first cornet and was wounded at Antietam.
Interesting
That’s very close to me last name- Lavallee - I have relatives in northern Vermont and my Dad went to seminary in Montreal
Damn that’s interesting! Never knew that. I love any Canadian connection I can find.
Thanks Calixa, thanks Canada.
I remember reading Rifles for Watie and it wasn't until now that I understand why keeping the Spencers out of the hands of confederate forces was such an important mission.
Glad I'm not the only one who read that book as a kid.
Ironic you brought up that book under a video with this title
That’s a good book
@@Winaskathey'll never catch the facts out here
Let me point out that "Watie" refers to Confederate Brigadier General Stand Watie, a Cherokee Chief. The Five Civilized Tribes were ALL allied with the Confederacy.
lol, this title.
Also, best reload under pressure scene since 1989's Glory, lol. Well done.
Lmao agreed
😮union army dropping their guns as they ran away was the main source of weapons for the confederacy.
Cool history fact, but its wrong! MOST of their weapons were stolen from forts, some were sold to them by the British! And yes, some were captured. Guess what, the union also captured weapons from the bleeding rotten racist corpses of confederate soldiers! Cool huh?
Just one thing--muscle memory from training would kick in for veteran troops. Additionally, a lot of troops in the early war, especially from the south, were already well trained as part of a general militia craze, modelled mostly after the French army from the earlier Crimean War in the early 1850s.
I would dispute classifying them as well-trained. They would have been competent at platoon and company level manoeuvres, but their firearms proficiency would actually have been quite lacking. Ammunition was expensive, and firearms training was very rudimentary.
On top of this, you have to remember that the overwhelming majority of the training would have been done by men who were themselves amateurs, often political appointees or local dignitaries, whose abilities would be highly variable. After the war, it was estimated that one-in-four of the soldiers on both sides had never fired their rifle before entering combat for the first time - the standard of training was just that bad.
This is actually why most firefights took place at such close ranges. The thing about the rifled-musket is that you can't just point it and shoot - it has a curving trajectory, which means that you need to have a good understanding of ballistics, distance judgement and windage in order to use it accurately beyond 100 metres. That kind of advanced musketry training simply did not exist in the United States at the time, not even in the regulars.
Pretty much the only units capable of using the rifled-musket at long range were specialists, like Berdan's Sharpshooters - and only then because they maintained very strict entry standards. You had to already be a naturally gifted marksman just to get into one.
@@biggiouschinnus7489 I disagree with your statement that lack of training resulted in close range firefights. Terrain--especially at battlefields like the Wilderness and Shiloh, not to mention Chickamauga, was a superb retardant for long range shooting. You don't shoot at something you can't see. Battlefields like Gettysburg are the exception--not the rule.
I'm struggling to imagine how muscle memory helps when the soldier can't shoot because the last cartridge is stuck in the gun and needs a special wrench to extract it, or when the weapon has become so hot that the area they're supposed to grip is searing their skin as they're trying to aim. Muscle memory speeds up reloading and repositioning to fire, but it doesn't change the times when the weapon doesn't function as intended. The U.S. Army's current rifles include a forward assist purely because soldiers knew how badly a failure to seat a cartridge could make all their marksmanship training irrelevant, and didn't want to take a chance on not having that option.
@@SingularityOrbit for a fouled up weapon-- and Karl didn't mention this-- urine was used when water wasn't available
And the forward assist is a terrible idea anyway.
Loved the outro talking about the human element rather than the material, it made me instantly subscribe to InRange.
Hold up and look into what Karl believes first man. He's not a good guy.
@@Shifty-hb4fv
Elaborate.
@@Shifty-hb4fv Eh…he’s cool to me.
@@Shifty-hb4fv I'm seeing labour rights, LGBTQ+ rights, anti-racism, and guns and history. Unless I'm missing something he seems exactly like the kind of guy I'd love to give some time to listening to what he has to say.
@@robertozee5024 RUclips auto filtering makes it difficult. I'll try in a reply to another dude in this thread
Good video! It's crazy to think that most weapons of war aren't only shiny, badass artifacts, that they were carried in battle mostly by scared young people and a window into the reality of what they went through
Atun-shei could single-handedly save The History Channel. Great video
OK but consider: Atun-Shei presents HITLER'S SECRET UFO!
He does already have enough time travelling Hitler to be on there 😅
No he couldnt. He’s a historically illiterate “fellow white” guy who pushes outright revisionist tripe that no expert in the related field would tolerate. Typical Orwellian Marxist revisionism. Wish I was exaggerating.
The idea that the union was fighting against racism is so obnoxiously hilarious that you’d think it was a right winger making a parody video mocking leftist historical illiteracy. Every gun in the civil war was killing “racists”. As every white man in the war agreed that the white race was superior. The myth that the north loved blacks and diversity and were fighting those yucky southern racists for equality, exists solely in the heads of leftist propagandists and revisionists in the 21st century. Those blue uniforms these two leftists are wearing to “own the racists!”, are the same blue uniforms used by white racists to exterminate American Indians and conquer vast swaths of Mexico in the name of white racial supremacy. Lol.
But because they’re two historically illiterate leftists who want to push some Orwellian revisionism and lay claim to white Christian meme accomplishments in the past. They are oblivious to this.
He's a history revisionist that parades around like he single handedly won the damn war.
0:42 Note to self: Don't drink coffee while watching Atun Shei collabs.
Just don't watch his garbage, period.
@starcoloneldunadansonoft501 Hey snowflake, had somebody hurt your feelings about Confederacy?
@@starcoloneldunadansonoft501 Got a response video ready?
@ravenoferin500 if that video is going to be made it would probably have a lot of improperly used words, like "socialist", "liberal", "communist" and of course "anarchy" in places where one would expect word "chaos"
You had me at “guns that killed racists”😊
@@FightinggameDailycompilation Are you implying the Confederacy wasn't racist
@@thestutteringspartan5155do you guys believe that the Union or the north wasn’t racist? Maybe look into William Sherman on his views on African Americans. You do know the Lincoln also contributed to the genocide of the Natives as well.
@@Calebevansmusic I never said they weren’t, everybody back then was pretty damn racist. But it’s insane to imply the Confederacy wasn’t racist/didnt practice an entire other level of racism than the Union.
@@Calebevansmusic Oh jeez, another one. Your ancestors should've fought harder if they wanted to own black people as property. They lost, move away if it bothers you.
This was United States Utility Learning, also known as USUL
nice...
It is the base, pillar if you will, of basic training
@Hypnobong I'm on excursion ATM. Can you wait a few days for reply?
Another Atun-shei and InRangeTV collab! Today is a great day!!!!
The variety of carbines, full-length rifled muskets, and pistols carried by cavalry on the Western Frontier during the war is bewildering. Some of the California cavalry in Arizona were carrying percussion converted 1817 "Common" rifles and Colt Dragoons.
One of the things I love about Karl as a firearms enthusiast is that his takes on it are absolutely ones that I can wholeheartedly agree with. Love your collaborations with him, and your research in general.
Exactly, hes a gun historian, but also a humanist
@@therideneverends1697
And don't forget Satanists and a
Communist.
But hey, nowadays that's the norm, so....
Yeah.
@@therideneverends1697
And don't forget Satanists and a
Communist.
But hey, nowadays that's the norm, so....
Yeah.
Dude's! I been waiting for a gun themed collab with you two forever lol
Have you seen their collab about John Brown?
When I joined the army, assistant M60 gunners were issued asbestos gloves for rapid barrel changes. You should have brought one.
Bring an M60? That'd be fun. I got to fire one while in the Navy in a 2010 end of fiscal year gun shoot (perks of being on a ship commissioned in the 70s. The navy is terrible at out-processing old small arms and the armory was loaded with antiques). Also got to fire an M14 on full auto and an M79. Saved the shells and made a set of shotglasses out of them. Everything except rum tastes like ass, but what can you do?
But if you just meant gloves, yeah, that's a good idea too.
Great practical demonstration of advantages/disadvantages of the evolution of the rifles during that period. Thank you.
I never knew the Henry rifle had so many disadvantages as one of the first repeating rifles.
Man, I’ve always been interested in this era of firearms, but there’s not really a good video that goes through them.
Good work!
InRange has LOADS of stuff about this era.
So glad I found this video just got back from Gettysburg and I am a huge fan of the civil war epic video
I'm from AZ... I still have friends and family in AZ... I can see the angle of the sun. You two are insane and have my mad respect for soldiering through to make this video. My hat is off gentlemen!
These snippets of karl saying "CAP!" have meme potential
I was hoping they would have covered the Sharps rifle/carbine since it was a trap door weapon that was used by a the Sharpshooters, cavalry, Pennsylvania Bucktails, and a few others.
We were thinking about it, but Karl already made a Sharps video during our John Brown collab
After watching this video, I better understand why so many mounted infantry folks wore gloves.
@@drewgoin8849 At least on one hand, ala Michael Jackson 😳
@@oregonoutback7779"Hee Hee!" 🧑🦯🚶🧑🦯🧑🦯🚶
Love when you two get together!! You have such great historical minds and compliment one another's focuses very well and entertainingly.
In the 1950's, when I was young I would go over to my uncle's home and my aunt would let me play outside with the Burnside rifle that they kept in the back entry way. It felt very heavy to me because of my young age. I fought many a battle with it.
Seen some of those at Civil War museums here in Missouri, a part of the war that is rarely talked about in history, or by people who look only in the east or south, not here in the Midwest.
I'm not a civil war expert, or for that matter, from the US, but I guess the lack of recognition that the hard fought, brutal and very consequential Missouri theater has in mainstream discourse might have to do with the fact it was embarrasing for both sides, for very different reasons. For the Union, it kinda brings out the indiscriminate brutality of the Red Leg/Jayhawk element, which is very aptly and briefly described in Atun Shei's review of Josie Wales. For the Confederates, although you might think they would like playing the victim on that one, the fact is that Confederate actions in Missouri had very little of the gallantry and ultimately doomed tactical genius or whatever they were mythologizing, and instead a lot of outlaw/bandit activity, which the Lost Cause was trying to define against, as it was the perception of the former Confederates at the end of the conflict - rebels, outlaws-. The fact the most famous ex Confederate combatant in that theater was one Jesse James is far far outside the Stonewall/Lee mythos. So that would be my honest guess.
1999 film "Ride With the Devil" is an underrated film that shows the brutality of inner-Civil War strife in the state Missouri. Missouri was probably one of if not the worst border states to ever be in during the Civil War. A state that wasn't safe to declare you allegiance to either the Union or the Confederacy. Doing so, well you would receive a violent welcome from a Missouri Bushwhacker or a Kansas Jayhawker. I don't know if Atun Shei did a movie review on RWTD.
@@spenceramey406 "Ride with the Devil" is a classic in my book. They got the history correct, for the most part, as well as costuming, weapons, dialects, sets, etc. He even got his hands on a new Henery at the end.
Yes, there seems to be an element of the-less-said-about-this-
the-better regarding Missouri in Civil War history.
@@franciscocalderara1500 Face it, the Trans-Mississippi theater had little in the way of gallantry nor tactics exhibited by either side. It was simply an extension of Bleeding Kansas violence except the belligerents could pretend that their atrocities were sanctioned by Washington or Richmond respectively.
I pity the men who served during this transitional time in human history. We were quickly moving towards the modern era, yet during this war the medical attention soldiers received was lacking. The bloodiest war in our history of conflict.
Lacking is putting it lightly, at times it was borderline sadistic!
The advancement in weapons, in a messed up way. Forced the advancement of medicine.
NGL, from the thumbnail, I thought that the cactus behind him was an elaborate pom pom for his hat like some kind of band master, glad to see i was wrong.
I'm glad Andy made it out to Arizona. Always a great time when you two are together!
Watching him struggle with those firearms, and Karl's aside glance made this more comical than I'm sure it was meant to be.
Also, you do not want to see how bad it got for the Confederates in terms of firearms, just saying.
I can only imagine how nerve-wracking reloading one of these guns during a battle would be.
No Dirty Dozen or Hateful Eight on InRange, but they’re firmly amongst the Honorable Handful.
Nah bro, Kasada is literally a Satanist
Hi, I just wanted to say I love your videos and your passion for history.
"What's for dinner tonight, Brain?"
"The same thing we ate all day, Pinky, they are boiling the guns as we speak".
Would have been interesting if you had had an accurate thermometer and measured the barrel and follower temperatures before and after firing, and then in minute intervals until it returned to its starting temperature.
Understanding military procurement a bit, I think cost probably also factored into the continued use of outdated technology. That was true in the British Army, who used the Long Land Pattern musket for over 100 years. ...or the Thompson SMG that only saw limited use in WW2, due to cost.
The Dune music in the opening got me, I won't lie. 🤣🤣
Dune reference had me laughing out loud. A rare occurrence as an Englishman.
Great video, loved the presentation, and the note you ended on was definitely one that helps remind us of the human element in all this; thank you for sharing
Prof from Main, I see what in the little round top you did there, Mr. Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain.
Thanks, always good seeing you & Karl together.
Man I always love your videos and it is very nice see a new video when you upload them I hope you have been doing well atun shei
the 1st Vermont Cavalry had sharps carbines and Savage pistols. The Savage was so flawed two vermonters died from Savage pistol incidents before any rebs did.
"Guns that killed racists" eh? So, all the confederate guns qualify as well, considering the north was just as racist, as the south. Not to mention the Union slave owners, who were permitted to keep their slaves after the proclamation of emancipation...
Yes but the union never start a war just to keep their slaves
@@BarryAllen__1A23 they started a war to keep the southern states, so...
Your post is pure yankee revisionism. Yes - the south had slavery, and yes - the first southern states seceeded over the issue of slavery - not because the north was trying to abolish it, but because the non-slave states were pushing legislation discriminating slave states, and those states decided that if they are not going to be equal partners in this whole 'Union" thing, they are going to leave. Only the federal forces said "no take backsies", and refused to vacate southern property that was no longer theirs. So Sumter happened. Then Virginia, North Carolina, Arkansas, and Tennessee basically said "if that's how you want to handle things - with bayonets, and sending troops against your own countrymen, we're with them".
And all this is glossing over the fact that at the time, negroes were basically livestock, and without trying to rectify this fundamental injustice, northern calls for abolition were hypocritical at best - it wasn't going to cost them anything (because slavery was already illegal in those states), but it would ruin southern economy, and force changes to the whole social structure (meaning rural versus city, not white v black - the north was happy to discriminate the blacks without even the courtesy of being honest about it) - and the south didn't want to be forced to change their way of life.
Granted - there was a fair bit of fearmongering in the south ("look out, the republicans will force white women to marry black men" - that sort of thing), but the issue is far more complex than the yankee revisionists would like. To them, anything that depicts the Confederates as less evil than Satan is unacceptable, and ditto with portraying the north as less than white knight virtuous.
TL:DR: both sides were equally racist, north was hypocritical about slavery, and the soputh had legitimate grievances besides' oh no, you won't take away our slaves".
Did you watch to the end of the video? I don't think you watched until the end of the video... They literally talk about how the joke in the title is just that; a joke, and how history is more complicated than that.
@@jakubfabisiak9810 I think we also should mention that unlike the rest of the world at the time, Washington didn't do much to ease in abolition. Gradual, compensated emancipation was proposed everywhere but South of the Mason-Dixon Line, iirc Northern legislators weren't fans early on. There was only one private attempt at recolonization in Southern Florida (which failed), the feds only did it in DC (to Liberia). So trying to force the removal of a constitutionally-protected institution on the South when they're in no ways capable of managing such a transition with no given resources or assistance, you cannot blame the man in gray.
@@BarryAllen__1A23 No, they just ran roughshod over the 10th amendment.
Slavery was an abomination and a violation of the civil rights for the 2-3 million slaves in the South, The Federal government ignoring state's rights as written in the Constitution was an abomination and a violation of the civil rights of every man, woman and child in the entire United States.
"Turn it around, sir."
Your collabs with inrange are great, hope to keep seeing them
Seeing as pretty much everyone at that time, Northerners included, were racists, even abolitionists (Most of them didn't like slavery but still saw non-whites as inferior), saying it was just Northern weapons that killed racists is a bit disingenuous. Even ol' Abe himself was a racist (some of his writings and recorded speeches are pretty damning). Sure, this is a good way to troll and rile up actual racists today, but it's a bit of a historical misnomer to say it was just Northern weapons killing racists. It was pretty damn even in that department, as most of the people actually doing the fighting weren't wealthy slave owners with vested interests, but poor folk who were drafted or riled up by propaganda into going to war...
Besides that caveat, great video on the period weapons!
You think talking about historical rifles is going to get me to watch? Considering I grew up on tales of the gun, you're damn right I will!
Also might be fun to talk about confederate rifles as well.
Cool! The guns of this era are so fascinating!
That loading procedure at 2 min in was painfully dangerous to watch!
Considering getting a War and Peace tattoo, including an iconic Union gun crossed with the M1 Garand. I was thinking the Henry Repeater, what do others think?
Not my body, not my buisness😊
Yes. Do it. More tattoos. More tattoos. Make yourself more visually interesting....or not as you become a blurry blue smear of randomness. Support local artists.
Andy's fucking titles, man.
Typical “fellow white” revisionism. The union and the confederats were both racist. The average union soldier and ranking man would have had Andy executed for being an anti-white, non-Christian “N-word” lover. No exaggeration. Lol in questionnaires distributed during the war, they asked the union soldiers how they felt having some black units in their forces. The responses would get you fired from your job and banned on every social media of said today. Lol
So it’s hilarious seeing this tard dressed up in a racists military garb, while pretending it stood against racism. That blue uniform these two dummies are wearing were the same uniforms worn by the same union soldiers who exterminated the American Indians and invaded Mexico and conquered vast swaths of it.
Lmfao!
Credit to Andy for shooting that scene with the Henry, struggling the whole time with the heat of it, and uploading it still.