Shankar Mahadevan is one of his kind... He sings Hindustani, Carnatic, Folk, Pop, Jazz, Rock etc... He sings in Marathi, Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Kannada, etc... His pronounciation in every language is spot-on. You will never see anyone complaining about his pronounciation. He is probably the most versatile singer we have in India. Really don't know why people don't acknowledge him as a singer in the league of Kishore, Rafi, SPB, Yesudas. Maybe, he is in his own league.
Its soo soothing to watch these old programs. No stupid bgm. Just soothing voices and whispers of instruments. No over action. He's soo humble even after knowing soo much! I don't belong to that generation. But I wish I were
@@debodatta7398 Muslims removed the God aspect from North Indian music so it would be pleasing to Muslims who hated Kaffirs. Read/Listen to Sandeep Balakrishnan. Dancers who used to Dance in Temples in North were made into Prostitutes and sold in markets from Kabul to Baghdad.
@@debodatta7398Not necessarily, just like differences in culture of Hindus in north and south there is a difference in music. Persian Classical (Which can be called Muslim Classical) is is one of Hardest classcials has some influence on Hindustani, so we may feel that. For example Kun Faya Kun is More on Persian side of Hindustani classical on the other hand raags like Malhaar, Bhairav, Durga are pure Hindustani. Im saying this coz i come from the most perfect neutral place MH, we have keertans/bhajans from both Karnataki and Hindusthani.
@@amreshlaldas236 i like the way you love invaders more than our own people. The sheer hate for our own blood is so awesome. And the amount of regionalism you have just gives me orgasm man, keep it up you'll go long very very long (right from Tamil Nadu to Andhra Pradesh) with this mindset. And how tf do you define north? I'm from Maharashtra tell me where am i South or North.
I've learnt Bharatanatyam, where I danced on the Carnatic classical songs and learnt Hindustani classic music also. In my opinion, Carnatic music is really great for dancing - full of beats (especially Mridangam) and Hindustani classical is better for listening - it touches my heart.
It all depends on personal taste actually. Hindustani compositions touch my heart too but some Carnatic pieces are amazing too. It's a tough choice but I'll go for Hindustani if i have to choose one. But it really depends on personal taste. Carnatic alapana is much more complicated than Hindustani alaps. My friend's grandmother says that Hindustani can never match Carnatic.
We have not one but two rich traditions of classical music, each so different and yet so complete and vast in themselves. Impossible to pick one over the other. Few artistes could have given this demo better than Shankar Mahadevan.
Hindustani classical music is so mesmerising that when you develop a raga, you develop it note by note and every raga looks so different and beautiful.. You can just visualise those raga as if they reveal themselves to you...just devine and out of the world.
@@AMALsjalwn Difficult maybe; but not impossible, since both of the music styles are imbibed in Indian culture one way or another, which is why both are often collectively called Indian Classical.
Carnatic is God's music.... Such a pleasure.. ARR explained once how he compose music for international movies, he use ragas such as sindhu bhairavi.. Etc.. From carnatic...
India is the only country which has such a rich culture of music having 'Two Immortal Stream of Classical Music' i.e. 'Hindustani Shastriya Sangeet'(North Indian style) & 'Carnatic Sangeet'(South Indian style)....which reflects the Real Essence of India...I feel very proud to be Indian and a Student of Indian Classical Music as I am born & brought up in a Musical Family.....though I am trained in Hindustani......but I love Carnatic too and I am happy to learn it.....I love to sing songs in Different regional languages.. though my mother tongue is Marathi.....I would like to say that......Every Indian must l learn Indian Classical Music first whether Hindustani of Carnatic ....then other music like western or jazz etc......🎵🎵
Did he just create two compositions impromptu??? One in hindustani and one in carnatic??? He's so versatile! He composes for bollywood (orchestrates indian music with western styles), sings hindustani and carnatic styles!
Thank you so very much for this program. While I understand and relate to Carnatic music I have been eagerly looking for someone who can break it Hindustani music to simple terms. Shankar Mahadevan is so talented but he is scientific as well. In his mind he has broken this system of music logically and it shows in his explanation and demo. I wish it went on for another few hours!!
I am so happy to watch this video, as I am a student of Carnatic and Hindustani music myself, I found this video really useful and Shankar Ji is really a wonderful singer.
As a student of both, do you like any form better than the other, me being just a listner, I like the Carnatic better cos it has the gamakas and the oscillation that allows more improvisations for the same ragam I feel, atleast that a non educated ear can catch. My wife is a hindustani student however, I find it somewhat bland comparatively, I may be wrong. What do ya say?
@@ninjusripada I'm a layman in music but lover of both styles... Through you've asked the question to someone else, I hope I can put forward my views too. I feel Hindustani classical aalap is comparatively simpler and Carnatic alapanai gets complex within the first 2 minutes of the piece. However, the main piece, the song, I feel, is tougher in Hindustani than Carnatic. Hindustani just has 2 main lines and 2 lines of the antara, and the singer has to stretch it for a long time, with less importance to lyrics and more importance to swars and taans. The concept of taans with "aaa" to any line is almost completely absent in Carnatic as far as I know. Carnatic songs have a lot of lyrics and the song part of Carnatic is comparatively simpler according to me. However, the singer can make at complicated by using styles such as Neraval.
@@ninjusripada I’m a student of both for a while. What might appear bland in Hindustani is actually meditative. Focusing on a single sur, slow alaap, repetitive phrases give a feeling that is similar to hours of meditation. Carnatic is relatively more dazzling in that sense. It’s the difference between going on a cruise ship vs vacationing in San francisco. I’ll take both :)
Today I chanced to view this. Shri Shankar Mahadevan tried to simplify the complexity for the benefit of uninitiated listeners. Musicologically, both the systems evolved from one basic fundamental practice and theory of music but got established as two significant 'Class' of Indian Classical Music. Karnataka Sangitam's great musicologists and practitioners contributed to create music complete 'rasa'nubhavam, rich experience of essence of melody and aesthetic supported by Svara, pure note and AnuSvara, micro note (s) in relation with its nearest pure note(s)-Seven-Twelve-Sixteen notes which encompasses whole music world, of any kind and variety. Karnataka Sangitam has Vilamba kala, contemplative laya; Madhyama kala, equipoise between contemplative and turita; Turita kala, fast and super fast laya-patterns of music in chalana, movement which takes the support of raga bhava; sahithya bhava; laya bhava to create rasanubhavam. Serious student, scholar and practitioner acquiring 'reasonable' level of skills, like Shankar Mahadevan, in Karnataka Sangitam's Lakshya, knowledge acquisition through listening experiences and Lakshya, theoretical knowledge, can easily understand, musically, any kind and forms of world music, Hindustani Music, no exception and can make even 'impromptu' performance. I am consciously avoiding to dwell on detailed differences of Lakshya and Lakshana aspects-musicological in both the systems. I want to clear the misconception that movement of slow and fast, pure note and oscillations of notes are the differences between Hindustani and Karnataka Sangitams. This is based more on the evolved and conventions in 'cutcheri' formats meeting the challenges of compression of quality time investment by the connoisseurs and patrons demands. It would have been great if Shri Shankar Mahadevan presented a composition of thrayee kalams-Vilamba-Madhya-Turita in both the systems to establish both unity and diversity; commonality and uncommonality.
Thanks for sharing...such an important video for me to watch because I love both genres immensely...not exposed to much of Mr Mahadevan classical prowess. Such a versatile musician. Commendable
This was so helpful to understand. The demo where Shankar ji is switching between Albela and Neranammithi was so seamless and the way he presents the styles are so evidently distinct.
Amazing facility with both styles. Kudos to Shankar Mahadevan. He has demonstrated, single-handedly, a fusion between both that most jugalbandhis don't manage to achieve.
Also if you want to know the difference between hindustani and carnatic music - listen ' Lagi Lagan pati sakhi' for hindustani and 'Vathapi Ganapathim' for carnatic music; both set to rag Hamsadhwani
Hindustani is not easy. I am a singer from South India trained in both Carnatic and Hindustani. In Hindustani, The singers will have a lot more adherence to sruthi. By gliding through the notes, voice becomes so rounded ..Carnatic is more structured and complex.. Both have it’s own qualities.
@@Motivatedminds_101 I would say Carnatic. Because it is defined and structured. Hindustani, in my opinion gives a lot of creative independence to the singer so it becomes difficult for beginners. But that is only my opinion
@Dinesh 2018 It is Karnataka, Purandaradasa is called as Father of Karnataka Sangeetha, Carnatic is the anglicised word of Karnataka. The music originated in the South Part (Carnatic part)
@Dinesh 2018 Actually what u r speaking is completely wrong,Kannada is much older than Telugu, the Karnata region was there from river Kaveri to Godavari region which is mentioned in Kavirajamarga of 9th century AD, the present day Godavari region belonged to ancient Karnataka, later it belonged to the present day Andra state. Carnatic is not derived from English , it is derived from word 'Karnataka' Just like the the English word 'loot' borrowed from Hindi word 'Loot'
@Dinesh 2018 There was no Telugu state in 5 AD most of the Andra and Telangana provinces were part of Rastrakutas and Chalukya Kings, the modern day Andra was a part of Karnataka.
people don't realize how incredibly difficult it is to have mastery over both forms of classical music. Shankar Mahadevan is unbelievably gifted. Fantastic singer.
Was the last composition in Kiravani??? And did he compose it on the spot???? The lines "Janaki Nandanaa Dasharatha Ramanaa". That last improv was very very good.
Before invasions, throughout India, only carnatic style prevailed. Essentially, it's not called carnatic style. The traditional Indian classical music was revived in Karnataka and was done by Shri Purandardassuru. So, it's called carnatic style. Otherwise, throughout India, it was same. Northern part of India was subjected to invasions. These invasions were not only by conquest, but were also cultural. So, music got divided.....
@@antonyanmar1111 Ancient classical music can be traced back to Vedic literature of Hinduism and the ancient Natyashastra. Well documented by Baratha Muni. The hymns in Samaveda has verses which explains the form of music. The original text is to be found in the British museum. There were two forms Ghandharva that is formal, ceremonial, composed and implied celestial and divine association. Gana is informal, improvised and for entertainment. The terms Carnatic and Hindustani were more recent aapx. 15 century onwards. Just thought of sharing my findings with you as there seems to be a gap and I couldn't get the answer for what Carnatic music was called prior to the 12-13 century. I may not be correct though as I am still researching. 😂👍🙏
aww.. this video made my day!!! I wanted to get one child trained in Shankar Mahadevan's academy. but their courses are so expensive, its more of a business. could someone recommend a very good teacher who can teach Carnatic or Hindustani along with perfect voice training for film songs. this is for a very highly talented kid.. Preferably someone who trains music reality show kids
It's the use of different gamakas in carnatic which makes it sound as if a lot is happening even in longer sustained notes. This is the major difference I feel - the use of gamakas
No doubt talented . Though Carnatic havent listened much only sometimes on TV , DOORDARSHAN . BUT regarding Hindustani Classical having listened to Ustad Bade Gulam Ali Khan Sahab . Ustad Salamat n Nazakat Ali khan sahabs etc it has not touched the heart . No doubt expert in Raagas but while singing Hindustani Classical , it has the touch of Carnatic . Commented based on what went to my ears .
The blended languages... i want to absorb all of this because i am so fascinated with indian classical music but i only understand english, sadly. the oscillations and slides of carnatic and hindustani are so beautiful, and i want to gain further understanding of the two styles 😭
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Shankar Mahadevan is one of his kind... He sings Hindustani, Carnatic, Folk, Pop, Jazz, Rock etc... He sings in Marathi, Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Kannada, etc... His pronounciation in every language is spot-on. You will never see anyone complaining about his pronounciation. He is probably the most versatile singer we have in India.
Really don't know why people don't acknowledge him as a singer in the league of Kishore, Rafi, SPB, Yesudas. Maybe, he is in his own league.
Its soo soothing to watch these old programs. No stupid bgm. Just soothing voices and whispers of instruments. No over action. He's soo humble even after knowing soo much! I don't belong to that generation. But I wish I were
ശങ്കർ ജി താങ്കൾ ഞങ്ങളുടെ സ്വകാര്യ അഹങ്കാരമാണ്
Both versions are the two eyes of Indian classical music.. Great.!! Hats off Shankarji.
one is eyes of hindu India (Carnatic) , other is eyes of muslim india (Hindustani)
@@debodatta7398 correct
@@debodatta7398 Muslims removed the God aspect from North Indian music so it would be pleasing to Muslims who hated Kaffirs. Read/Listen to Sandeep Balakrishnan.
Dancers who used to Dance in Temples in North were made into Prostitutes and sold in markets from Kabul to Baghdad.
@@debodatta7398Not necessarily, just like differences in culture of Hindus in north and south there is a difference in music. Persian Classical (Which can be called Muslim Classical) is is one of Hardest classcials has some influence on Hindustani, so we may feel that. For example Kun Faya Kun is More on Persian side of Hindustani classical on the other hand raags like Malhaar, Bhairav, Durga are pure Hindustani. Im saying this coz i come from the most perfect neutral place MH, we have keertans/bhajans from both Karnataki and Hindusthani.
@@amreshlaldas236 i like the way you love invaders more than our own people. The sheer hate for our own blood is so awesome. And the amount of regionalism you have just gives me orgasm man, keep it up you'll go long very very long (right from Tamil Nadu to Andhra Pradesh) with this mindset. And how tf do you define north? I'm from Maharashtra tell me where am i South or North.
The way he sang "Sidhi Vinayaka Arulpurivai" at 8:13 .. it was oozing with Veera rasa.. wonderful.
I've learnt Bharatanatyam, where I danced on the Carnatic classical songs and learnt Hindustani classic music also. In my opinion, Carnatic music is really great for dancing - full of beats (especially Mridangam) and Hindustani classical is better for listening - it touches my heart.
It all depends on personal taste actually. Hindustani compositions touch my heart too but some Carnatic pieces are amazing too. It's a tough choice but I'll go for Hindustani if i have to choose one.
But it really depends on personal taste. Carnatic alapana is much more complicated than Hindustani alaps. My friend's grandmother says that Hindustani can never match Carnatic.
We have not one but two rich traditions of classical music, each so different and yet so complete and vast in themselves.
Impossible to pick one over the other.
Few artistes could have given this demo better than Shankar Mahadevan.
Hindustani classical music is so mesmerising that when you develop a raga, you develop it note by note and every raga looks so different and beautiful.. You can just visualise those raga as if they reveal themselves to you...just devine and out of the world.
"How do you sing both Hindustani and Carnatic?"
Me: Well, he is a talented and hardworking singer.
10% talent, 90% work
@@Cislouille No actually.
If study carnatic first and then hindustani, it's easy.... But if it's other way round, it's difficult.....
@@AMALsjalwn
Difficult maybe; but not impossible, since both of the music styles are imbibed in Indian culture one way or another, which is why both are often collectively called Indian Classical.
@@rishabhrox1 yes bro...I said difficult.. Not impossible...😊
Carnatic is God's music.... Such a pleasure..
ARR explained once how he compose music for international movies, he use ragas such as sindhu bhairavi.. Etc.. From carnatic...
being north indian,i also feel more connected with carnatic
Sindhu bhairavi is based on Hindustani raga Bhairavi..just add Shudha Dha..older one is Bhairavi..
Carnatic sings about God most of the times.... when we hear Tyagaraja s kirthi... we are struck and stunned there with RAMA.
The swar Re in Hindustani music is always pronounced Ri in Carnatic music. A very important difference.
But still it's rishabham
If we take short of every note,Ri is more correct for Rishabh or Rishabham
And it's dha in hindustani and da in carnatic
@@saisumukhakv8153 It's dha in both Carnatic and Hindustani
@@saisumukhakv8153 No.
Brilliant, but for those who are wondering, the Carnatic song Nera Nammiti at @9:40 was not composed by Tyagaraja, but by Mysore Vasudevacharya.
India is the only country which has such a rich culture of music having 'Two Immortal Stream of Classical Music' i.e. 'Hindustani Shastriya Sangeet'(North Indian style) & 'Carnatic Sangeet'(South Indian style)....which reflects the Real Essence of India...I feel very proud to be Indian and a Student of Indian Classical Music as I am born & brought up in a Musical Family.....though I am trained in Hindustani......but I love Carnatic too and I am happy to learn it.....I love to sing songs in Different regional languages.. though my mother tongue is Marathi.....I would like to say that......Every Indian must l learn Indian Classical Music first whether Hindustani of Carnatic ....then other music like western or jazz etc......🎵🎵
Did he just create two compositions impromptu??? One in hindustani and one in carnatic??? He's so versatile! He composes for bollywood (orchestrates indian music with western styles), sings hindustani and carnatic styles!
No, he didn't "create" but summoned at will. No mean feat.
It’s like a Jugalbandi with Shankar ji dual role
So the audience is also actors !....Wow..!
50 rupye kaat overacting ka
😂
😂😂true
NOT ABLE TO DIGEST THE GLORY OF INDIAN MUSIC.
-50
That mrudangam player just rocked
i love both...but carnatic puts a smile on my face, maybe because i was born in kerala and brings back a lot of memories
Shankarji, excellent, you are savyasachi, a priceless gem of India in both Hind and carnatic classical music. We are proud of you Sir.
Thank you so very much for this program. While I understand and relate to Carnatic music I have been eagerly looking for someone who can break it Hindustani music to simple terms. Shankar Mahadevan is so talented but he is scientific as well. In his mind he has broken this system of music logically and it shows in his explanation and demo. I wish it went on for another few hours!!
I am so happy to watch this video, as I am a student of Carnatic and Hindustani music myself, I found this video really useful and Shankar Ji is really a wonderful singer.
As a student of both, do you like any form better than the other, me being just a listner, I like the Carnatic better cos it has the gamakas and the oscillation that allows more improvisations for the same ragam I feel, atleast that a non educated ear can catch. My wife is a hindustani student however, I find it somewhat bland comparatively, I may be wrong. What do ya say?
@@ninjusripada I'm a layman in music but lover of both styles... Through you've asked the question to someone else, I hope I can put forward my views too.
I feel Hindustani classical aalap is comparatively simpler and Carnatic alapanai gets complex within the first 2 minutes of the piece. However, the main piece, the song, I feel, is tougher in Hindustani than Carnatic. Hindustani just has 2 main lines and 2 lines of the antara, and the singer has to stretch it for a long time, with less importance to lyrics and more importance to swars and taans.
The concept of taans with "aaa" to any line is almost completely absent in Carnatic as far as I know. Carnatic songs have a lot of lyrics and the song part of Carnatic is comparatively simpler according to me. However, the singer can make at complicated by using styles such as Neraval.
@@ninjusripada I’m a student of both for a while. What might appear bland in Hindustani is actually meditative. Focusing on a single sur, slow alaap, repetitive phrases give a feeling that is similar to hours of meditation. Carnatic is relatively more dazzling in that sense. It’s the difference between going on a cruise ship vs vacationing in San francisco. I’ll take both :)
Khatarnaak singing and knowledge.. Wow
Today I chanced to view this. Shri Shankar Mahadevan tried to simplify the complexity for the benefit of uninitiated listeners. Musicologically, both the systems evolved from one basic fundamental practice and theory of music but got established as two significant 'Class' of Indian Classical Music. Karnataka Sangitam's great musicologists and practitioners contributed to create music complete 'rasa'nubhavam, rich experience of essence of melody and aesthetic supported by Svara, pure note and AnuSvara, micro note (s) in relation with its nearest pure note(s)-Seven-Twelve-Sixteen notes which encompasses whole music world, of any kind and variety. Karnataka Sangitam has Vilamba kala, contemplative laya; Madhyama kala, equipoise between contemplative and turita; Turita kala, fast and super fast laya-patterns of music in chalana, movement which takes the support of raga bhava; sahithya bhava; laya bhava to create rasanubhavam. Serious student, scholar and practitioner acquiring 'reasonable' level of skills, like Shankar Mahadevan, in Karnataka Sangitam's Lakshya, knowledge acquisition through listening experiences and Lakshya, theoretical knowledge, can easily understand, musically, any kind and forms of world music, Hindustani Music, no exception and can make even 'impromptu' performance. I am consciously avoiding to dwell on detailed differences of Lakshya and Lakshana aspects-musicological in both the systems.
I want to clear the misconception that movement of slow and fast, pure note and oscillations of notes are the differences between Hindustani and Karnataka Sangitams. This is based more on the evolved and conventions in 'cutcheri' formats meeting the challenges of compression of quality time investment by the connoisseurs and patrons demands. It would have been great if Shri Shankar Mahadevan presented a composition of thrayee kalams-Vilamba-Madhya-Turita in both the systems to establish both unity and diversity; commonality and uncommonality.
What does a music student want?
A school
A teacher
Text
Lecture
Answer is shanker mahadevan
Fantastic.... For the first time i got some light on these two great form of indian classical music
Shankar ji is the only person who saw abilities in Arijit.Shankar ji gifted Arijit his first break.Long live sir
why. which song was it
@@Hwoman1123 highschool musical
It was Mithoon who give him first commercial break.
Thanks for sharing...such an important video for me to watch because I love both genres immensely...not exposed to much of Mr Mahadevan classical prowess. Such a versatile musician. Commendable
You are an awesome Singer. Lord Ganesha has blessed you abundantly. Proud to know that you are a Malayali as me.
A pure legend. A thousand hearts for his wonderful talent
Awesome singing mahadevan sir and incredible lovely indian music with all various styles .
Omg! He is my second top teacher for the singing lessons. Love his voice and way of singing.
Who is first teacher bro?
Sonu sir. Who is yours,bro?
Mridangam itself can convey an emotion the tonal quality it has
This was so helpful to understand. The demo where Shankar ji is switching between Albela and Neranammithi was so seamless and the way he presents the styles are so evidently distinct.
Feels like watching Doora Darshan channel
That's hilarious... Too much of sanskriti
Amazing facility with both styles. Kudos to Shankar Mahadevan. He has demonstrated, single-handedly, a fusion between both that most jugalbandhis don't manage to achieve.
Love the show of differences and similarities between Carnatic aur Hindustani sangeetham!!!
Also if you want to know the difference between hindustani and carnatic music - listen ' Lagi Lagan pati sakhi' for hindustani and 'Vathapi Ganapathim' for carnatic music; both set to rag Hamsadhwani
What love & passion for music .. after being computer engineer he leave it because for love towards music. Salute u sir
Hindustani is not easy. I am a singer from South India trained in both Carnatic and Hindustani. In Hindustani, The singers will have a lot more adherence to sruthi. By gliding through the notes, voice becomes so rounded ..Carnatic is more structured and complex.. Both have it’s own qualities.
I came here to have some clarity so that I can choose one form as I want to learn it. But I cannot decide. Can you guide me here please?
@@tanvi5378 If you are in North India it's better learn Hindustani because of availability of Hindustani teachers
Which course is absolutely suitable for a beginner?
@@Motivatedminds_101 I would say Carnatic. Because it is defined and structured. Hindustani, in my opinion gives a lot of creative independence to the singer so it becomes difficult for beginners. But that is only my opinion
Where are you from ? Because I think carnatic is more complex than hindustani
meri umar bhi apko lag jaye dat was really heart touching...thats music..jai maa Saraswati..
Wow what a music prodigy ... Great person and very highly talented
Indeed great and rare demonstration .Sublime treat for all the musicians .
My most favourite singer and composer is Mr Shankar Mahadevan superb mind blowing outstanding great
Shankar sir No Words 🙏🌹 Luv u a lot.
Awesome...Shankar Sir ....What a performance..mind blowing..😊😊
This video is very very useful for any classical music lovers…..hats off Shankarji 👌🏻👌🏻👏👏
Namaste Shankar ji. Very impressive explanation and comparison of both forms of Indian Classical Music 👍🙏
Never even thought that such a humble person can exist. 🙏
🙏🙏Truly
today i gain so many knowledge about the difference betwn karnataka nd hindusthani music...lots of luv sir ji..ur song make me mad...kyaa baat👌👌
Karnataka is a state. It is Carnatic music. Not Karnataka.
It not carnatic it is Karnataka shastriya sangeetha
@Dinesh 2018
It is Karnataka, Purandaradasa is called as Father of Karnataka Sangeetha, Carnatic is the anglicised word of Karnataka.
The music originated in the South Part (Carnatic part)
@Dinesh 2018
Actually what u r speaking is completely wrong,Kannada is much older than Telugu, the Karnata region was there from river Kaveri to Godavari region which is mentioned in Kavirajamarga of 9th century AD, the present day Godavari region belonged to ancient Karnataka, later it belonged to the present day Andra state.
Carnatic is not derived from English , it is derived from word 'Karnataka'
Just like the the English word 'loot' borrowed from Hindi word 'Loot'
@Dinesh 2018
There was no Telugu state in 5 AD most of the Andra and Telangana provinces were part of Rastrakutas and Chalukya Kings, the modern day Andra was a part of Karnataka.
How talented n excellent Shankar Mahadevan is ...he knows both the Indian musics so well ..👏👏🤗
I am loved tabla very much and basic bole play on tabla. Tabla give me postive energy in my life.
Wow !!! Iss age me itna knowledge bht bari baat ha !!!
Extremely versatile singer.. what a talent. Blown away by the way he handled switching Hindusthani and Carnatic, seamlessly.
people don't realize how incredibly difficult it is to have mastery over both forms of classical music. Shankar Mahadevan is unbelievably gifted. Fantastic singer.
Thank you for uploading such great videos from the archive! 🙏
Very interesting conversation. I learnt a lot of things from Sankar ji about both streams. ❤️🙏
Sir, thank u for sharing more useful video to know the beauty of Indian classical music
Brilliant mahadevan. Simply love his music.
Really awesome such a great singer
He is just UNMATCHABLE.. and unique...🙏
Love you sir ❤️❤️
The unparallel Shankar Mahadevan is really a Bharat Ratna.
He is just awesome and probably underrated these days......At that age,he just did a prodigious perfomance
After rock on II went horribly at the box office, Shankar Ehsaan Loy are nowhere to be seen.
Anku J said who?
He's not underrated
wah bhut vdia interview .. or diff. between hindustani or south indian music
I feel if you take the time to understand Carnatic and appreciate it, it can take you to another dimension spiritually.
Was the last composition in Kiravani??? And did he compose it on the spot???? The lines "Janaki Nandanaa Dasharatha Ramanaa". That last improv was very very good.
Thank you Ma'am for sharing this video with all of us.
Outstanding and natural Shankar ji
I love shankar gee love u god bless u
There is something hidden in your voice sir ...just love your voice
This video needs more views
but the thing is both classicals are awesome and different ,amazing .Both are for vocal training and Shankar sir explained it in excellent manner🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
The renderings of evergreen Ustads have no substitute . Unparallel the accent n all added flavour n their accurate throwing
Before invasions, throughout India, only carnatic style prevailed. Essentially, it's not called carnatic style. The traditional Indian classical music was revived in Karnataka and was done by Shri Purandardassuru. So, it's called carnatic style. Otherwise, throughout India, it was same. Northern part of India was subjected to invasions. These invasions were not only by conquest, but were also cultural. So, music got divided.....
true.. they were differentiated from one another only in 12th or 13th centuries during medieval period.
So what was it called prior to it being called Carnatic music
Yes .... Your right.. Hindustani Music is kind of mixture and Carnatic is pure
@@SrinathJ2122 Original music.
@@antonyanmar1111 Ancient classical music can be traced back to Vedic literature of Hinduism and the ancient Natyashastra. Well documented by Baratha Muni. The hymns in Samaveda has verses which explains the form of music. The original text is to be found in the British museum. There were two forms Ghandharva that is formal, ceremonial, composed and implied celestial and divine association. Gana is informal, improvised and for entertainment. The terms Carnatic and Hindustani were more recent aapx. 15 century onwards. Just thought of sharing my findings with you as there seems to be a gap and I couldn't get the answer for what Carnatic music was called prior to the 12-13 century. I may not be correct though as I am still researching. 😂👍🙏
aww.. this video made my day!!! I wanted to get one child trained in Shankar Mahadevan's academy. but their courses are so expensive, its more of a business. could someone recommend a very good teacher who can teach Carnatic or Hindustani along with perfect voice training for film songs. this is for a very highly talented kid.. Preferably someone who trains music reality show kids
Amazing shankar ji. This video made my day
I am into Carnatic 🙏🏻
What into carnatic?
@@pregmeshmp1402 music
It's the use of different gamakas in carnatic which makes it sound as if a lot is happening even in longer sustained notes. This is the major difference I feel - the use of gamakas
Just Lovely, Shankar!
Shankar ji is a great person and a great musician
the Host was more excited when Shankar sang Carnatic style
Host woman is very beautiful and graceful😍😍
No doubt talented .
Though Carnatic havent listened much only sometimes on TV , DOORDARSHAN .
BUT regarding Hindustani Classical having listened to Ustad Bade Gulam Ali Khan Sahab . Ustad Salamat n Nazakat Ali khan sahabs etc it has not touched the heart . No doubt expert in Raagas but while singing Hindustani Classical , it has the touch of Carnatic . Commented based on what went to my ears .
App loga bahut achha video banate hai ji
Very nice, great explanation. Shankar has great knowledge of music.
Wah superb knowledge shanker ji hats off
Shankar Mahadevan Sir !!!! Salute to you 🙏🙏🙏
#legendry_Singer
love from PAKISTAN ....
Shankar sir beautifull heart...all god all bless you sir...
It was wonderful n musically satisfying video 🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶
Shankar Mahadevan is Gem of India ❤️
दुर्गाजी मला हा कार्यक्रम आयोजित करण्यात मला आनंद होत आहे
Even if i tell 10000 times you are really great still I can't do justice in praising you
Noble person - What a knowledgeable person...Indian Music industry is so much fortunate
I did not know the difference between Hindustani & Carnatic Music. Thank you Mr Shankar Mahadevan
Beautifully explained by Shankar ji
It's really Great, awesome ❤️❣️ superb...
Thanq so much 🤗💞
You explained it in the Best level.... classic 💕
Music is divine in any form as it comes...🙏
We proud. Wards are not enough to say something on the legendary person Dr madhaban
The blended languages... i want to absorb all of this because i am so fascinated with indian classical music but i only understand english, sadly. the oscillations and slides of carnatic and hindustani are so beautiful, and i want to gain further understanding of the two styles 😭