I'm just looking into an AM5 7900X build for my next system and this was exactly the video I needed. Was very unsure about the cooler I needed. Thanks for the effort! And somehow you made a video about cooling benchmarks fun and interesting to watch. Well done! 😁
@@wiktec I think its around 5100Mhz all cores, it performs very well with some undervolting and watt reduction. With the N15 I'm getting 81 degree's and CBR23 score of 29,700, With a 160 TDP, still close to 5300 all cores.
Thanks for the review. The only thing you missed was the possibility of using some coolers in 7900x Eco mode. For some users, this will be an acceptable air cooling solution.
Thanks for this video! Microcenter had a 7900x bundle I couldn't refuse but I was coming from a 6700k so I had no clue what thermal headroom i needed for the upgrade.
Currently running my 7900x @ 170W, 5.7Ghz Max. Cooling it with SilverStone AK620, Never goes above 95 degrees C. hits 1400+ pts in Cinebench 2024 and 26000+ Cinebench R23.
But it IS AMD's fault and it's not. They made the heat spreader thicker to make it compatible with AM4 coolers. Look at the delidded temps DerBauer got. They sacrificed temps to preserve cooler compatibility but they may have gone too far.
literally just got done installing a Arctic Liquid Freezer III 360 AIO on my 7900x. I'll have to wait til tomorrow to see what the temps look like though because it turns out my psu's cables are too short for the new case I also bought, lol. I had to order extension cables on Amazon.
The real solution is to get the non X version @65 watts so what if the base clock is 3.7 compared to 4.7 you can still overclock it. I've never been a fan of these big coolers.
Thank you for an interesting video. I have the ryzen 7900X, unlike other ryzens I have not undervolted or overclocked. I cooled it with thermaltake double tower, and temps idle at 45C under max load reached 85C. It makes me wonder what is the big fuss about temp control of these 7000 CPUs.
Pretty sure u don't need to add ambient temp on top of what's getting reported.. The Temp is the temp reported.. And under volting actually increased my cinebench score
This test makes absolutely no sense. See hardware Canucks vidéo. 95 degrees is a target (frequency is adjusted to match this target, even with the best cooler you can get 95 deg, but with a larger frequency). Fixing the voltage makes no sense with these CPU as they can automatically adjust it to what they need. Only changing the values of the curve optimizer, and the throttle temperature makes sense. You can change the throttle target to 70 deg if you want, with any cooler, and you will just have a lower frequency than with a target at 95 deg. For most applications having 5.2 instead of 5.5 GHz will not be a big deal.
Still waiting for the next gen NH-D15. [sigh]. I do plan a 9ooo series, 16 cores, Zen 5 on AM5, and the plan is to set it to self regulate and clock when & where and how it can, and if it gets to 95 ~ well throttle down already! I don't plan to manually clock the thing up & over-volt it just to see what happens. It's designed to run at 95 and self-regulate to stay about there, when loaded. That sounds fine, but when you manually set clocks and voltages and stuff to show how hot it gets, you're breaking that self management and regulation it is designed to do. It's a little bit like jamming the thermostat in your car and then complaining that it boils. That's the sort of thing Top Gear did, not a real car show ~
I have 7900x with Dark Rock Pro 4 air cooler, H7 Flow case with 2x PWM fans, 140mm front and 120mm rear. Cinebench R23, 10 min 100% CPU workload, temp got up to 94 C. My test show that it is about the case and the CPU cooler. The fans can reduce a few degrees but not much. AMD says clearly that 95 C is tjmax but not the limit for power. So it is a safe working 24/7 temp. without reducing efficiency or risking damaging the cpu.
Just run new test with everything closed. Max temp of cores, 92.9 C, one CCD got to 95 for a fraction of a second. Most of the cores never passed 80 C. So, Dark Rock can cool it just fine, if you have a mesh case with solid airflow.
Same case and same cooler here, confirmed this. I also have 2 case fans, one in front and one in back. Being satisfied with temps I decided to gift my pc 2 more coolers in front, just waiting my fan splitter to arive. The front of h7 case is like ice cold always and pulling in fresh air. That is realy one amazing case.
@@vladasimovic2732was looking to get a nice case for this for air cooling. Thinking about the fractal north. Do you think that would be a good fit for it? also thinking about a fractal north xl but I'm worried a bit about space
@@TheSpineOfTheWorld Hi, tbh I don't remember quite clearly about the specs for Fractal North. The cases are great, but you should consider the width for air cooler. It should be at least a little wider when considering MB, CPU and cooler. Safe bet would be 5cm wider I think, but I saw some people fitting it quite tight and having no problem. Also, consider the length if you have big GPU. Mine is 4090 so it is HUGE. So far, I am really happy with my setup. Hope I helped at least a little...
Because the cooling performance of different coolers in relation to one another can change depending on the amount of heat. This is also not exclusive to Water coolers. Take Noctua's NH-D15 & U12A. Depending on the load, the U12A (can) outperform a D15. But turn the heat up and the D15 will be far in front of a U12. The list you are referring too was created using a 3900x that pushes 135W. And the order of cooler on that list is exclusive for that very specific use case. Change the CPU, change the load, and the order can switch. Keep in mind that the list will not "change" but coolers that perform quite similarly might switch places. We used that list to have an "indication" of what to expect. And because that list would not apply directly to the 7900x, we removed the actual numbers. I pulled up the excel sheet where I have all the cooling numbers for all Ryzen 7000 chips. The 360 vs 280 problem comes up with those chips too. Temp normalized to 23°: LF 360 7600x -> 76,4°C ( .4°C better) LF 280 7600x -> 77°C LF 360 7900x -> 82,9°C (.5°C worse) LF 280 7900x -> 82,4°C So if I would have created "real" benchmark lists for every cooler in combination with every Ryzen chip, depending on the chip, the coolers would have switched places. For any benchmark charts that you see out there, you should take them only as sort of an indication how a cooler will perform compared to other ones. But it's never an exact value if you do not happen to have the exact same system. Most of the times such a list will be somewhat accurate. But keep in mind that things might be open to minimal changes. I've seen a dozen Reddit posts of people asking about a LF 280 vs LF 360 comparison. Then someone posts my video under it, accompanied by an army of people referring to Gamers Nexus video and calling me out for not having 1-1 the same results. What everybody forgets there is that GM pushed almost 200W through their coolers, we are doing (only) 130. And what can happen here is that the results at the top end will start to get squished together and sometimes a bit blurry. I did my very best to find an example for this other than myself as a source. Surprisingly, I did not find a single person that did a complete Arctic Lineup comparison using different loads. The closest thing I could find is Anandtech and their LF 420 Review. They did a bunch of graphs at different loads using various coolers. images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph16427/120490.png -> 200W images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph16427/120491.png -> 250W images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph16427/120492.png -> 340W Ignore the LF 240 and keep an eye on the LF 420 vs Alphacool 360. For 200W, the LF 420 had the first spot. Not by a lot though. For 250W, the Alphacool took over. Again by a tiny amount. At 340W, the difference became quite big. And this is the exact same thing. They switched places because the load changed. But, the trend of the graph is still applicable regardless of the load. At any point, both coolers were at the top, and a lot better compared to the last few ones. Just don't take these numbers 1-1. Look where they stand +- compared to everything else. Sorry for the enormous answer. I'm shocked myself. Just got this question way to often over the last few months and wanted to answer it once and for all. Hope this helped :)
@@STSYT thank you for the detailed reply helps a lot. By the way I was not questioning your testing mythology or results. First video I have seen of yours and just by basic knowledge of how heat/cooling works I figured 360 should of been better
hey i didn't see the 420 listed in your chart.. Just curious - Did you see any improvements with the big 420 rad? Also if i'm reading this right, you saw better temps on the 280 vs the 360 ? (arctic liquid freeze II). currently upgrading me 7700k to either: 12900k, 13700k, or 7900x. currently running a 280 rad, but can fit a 420 if there are some actual improvements, not just 1-2c.
Hey, thanks for the video, it's exactly what I was looking for in making a decision for my 7900x. One question thought, why is there a difference between the top 2 coolers? Aren't they the same model + extra RGB lights on one of them? I'm looking to buy one of them, but the RGB part is throwing me off haha. I'm not really interested in the lights, but if it runs cooler, why not. :)
the 7900 instead of 7900x is a better option. Lower wattage and heat dissipation out of the box with decent performance + ability to over clock and match the max boost that of the 7900x a win win.
I have 7900X with AK400 cooler, I can get 5.4 GHZ all cores with a -35 curve optimizer and target temperature of 85 degrees. Cinebench R23 score of slightly above 30000. If I change the cooler I may get 100 or 200 more MHz, this is not a bit deal at all.
Hey man! I wanted to just ask because i am going with the 7900x and im getting the arctic liquid freezer II 360mm for about 50 euros because my freind is selling it for me and it hasnt been used at all and i will pair it with the 7900x so is that good?
I wish you could also test id-cooling. Xilence sorta reminds me of them.... Also fairly cheap, but decent in some variants. Now what I read from this video - I can undervolt 7900x and use 32eur cooler with this in my mITX case - fingers crossed ⚔️ ))
I guess the outcome is to use a water cooler. They tend to be expensive and also need the right type of case to mount them. I currently have 12600k and that runs great with a tower cooler so cant see me changing soon.
Or, A D15, a Peerless Assassin 120, etc. You really really do not have to spend a ton of money on an AIO. A 35 dollar PA120 will be fine for the vast majority of users. If you work in a naturally hot environment, and while in that environment regularly pump your CPU to its max for long durations, yes, get an AIO, but if the answer to one or all of those is "no", stop wasting money.
Great video as always. It's interesting, how difficult it will be for aircoolers to handle 13.gen. It's a bit harder to cool AMD 7xxx series, because of this chiplet design, maybe those aircooler will have better luck with Intel. I meah, Xilence can handle 220W of TDP, it should be enough to cool 13600K, at least on paper.
Can you please shed a light whether a DeepCool AS500 PLUS can handle 7900X? Different resources state that AS500 is almost as powerful as Noctua DH-15. Could a big bang for a buck.
Hey man not sure if this is because later updates but I cant get my 7900x to run past 95c even If I wanted to, seems like it just throttles at this temp. How are you even getting temps of 108c?
It’s been a while, but I believe to remember that we could just adjust TjMax in bios. Never Z and X boards can do that, and I think that’s also how we did it back then
Idk how I see so many state that the 7900x gets super hot. I have a 7900x with the nzxt kraken elite 360 rgb 3 fan. The highest I've seen it get in full high settings is 70-73c gaming 6hrs. I also have the nzxt elite flow case with 3 big front fans. Idk if I'm just lucky but I never reach above 83
My noctua NH-U12S-SE managed 97°C in prime 95 stress test after 30 minutes of waiting so I think its ok with me because I just use the eco mode anyway :) plenty of power for me
@@thealien_ali3382 not with eco mode. it takes less power and doesnt get so hot. in eco mode it runs at 45-50°C if im just wathcing youtube or not doing anything and only uses 45-50 Watts of energy
Great video! I'm tired of all these reviewers using 360 AIO like this would be some kind of common cooling everyone is using. I wish you would add SilentiumPC coolers - probably cheap and very good. Temperature is one thing but what about throttling? Noctura can keep it under 96C great, but what about clocks?
I ve orderd an corsair aio 280 but I will cancel my order and buy the dark rock 4 pro. I have the 500fx case with 3 x12 12 front fans and 1x14 rear and 1x14 upper exhaust fan will be ok.
well for me second fan for nh-d15 didn't fit, so yeah, not great. At the beginning I had water cooler but it didn't cool that beast, that when I decided to buy best air cooler) correction: added case fans to optimize case airflow - now NH-D15 tamed that CPU)
Strange BIOS setups for these chips. I'm wondering already if they'll be like the 5800X. It was discovered that the 5800X is overvolted by most Mobo makers. If you do a negative voltage offset on a 5800X and manually set the PBO to +200, they will boost to about 5.1ghz and still run about 8 to 10c cooler on my NH-U14S.... I'm wondering if the same will apply to these new Zen 4 and they are simply set up crazy. I predict a wave of undervolting videos for new GPUs and CPUs.
im running the be quiet rock pro 4 with 7900x and yea it does get hot, but in gaming alone its perfecly stable at around 60% - 70%temps. i may need to get a watercooler but i dont like having loud fans in my system. anyone can reccmomend me a quiet water cooler?
The effort put in this video for this specific situation is amazing thanks.
I'm just looking into an AM5 7900X build for my next system and this was exactly the video I needed. Was very unsure about the cooler I needed. Thanks for the effort!
And somehow you made a video about cooling benchmarks fun and interesting to watch. Well done! 😁
I would definitely lock this cpu at 125W as the performance loss is too small to justify using it in unlimited mode.
whats it clocking at 125W?
@@jessielees I'm not remember the clocks, but the drop in frequency is less than 200mhz.
@@wiktec I think its around 5100Mhz all cores, it performs very well with some undervolting and watt reduction. With the N15 I'm getting 81 degree's and CBR23 score of 29,700, With a 160 TDP, still close to 5300 all cores.
@@jessielees 65w for me 🤣
My pc blue screen for 65watts hahaha had to lock it at 125@@eriknordqvist9016
Thanks for the review. The only thing you missed was the possibility of using some coolers in 7900x Eco mode.
For some users, this will be an acceptable air cooling solution.
Or just getting the non X version
Eco mode is trash
@@godnamedtayliteral cap 🧢
Bought the D15 when they first came out for my build! Still a beast of a cooler
I have recently built a new setup, Ryzen 9 7900X with a NZXT Kraken 280 AIO Cooler. It works just fine.
Fantastic, exactly what I needed for my latest build!
Thanks for this video! Microcenter had a 7900x bundle I couldn't refuse but I was coming from a 6700k so I had no clue what thermal headroom i needed for the upgrade.
Sure! Glad you enjoyed it!
Currently running my 7900x @ 170W, 5.7Ghz Max. Cooling it with SilverStone AK620, Never goes above 95 degrees C. hits 1400+ pts in Cinebench 2024 and 26000+ Cinebench R23.
I'm glad i watched this video! I'm looking at doing a 7900x build very soon and had ordered a BeQuiet! CPU air cooler. Order canceled lol
Seriously helpful video mate, thanks!
If you have an Asus mainboard make test with the last 0705 Bios. Now the cpu's are cooler than before. My 7700X is 10 degrees cooler now.
Very good video, it help me !
But it IS AMD's fault and it's not. They made the heat spreader thicker to make it compatible with AM4 coolers. Look at the delidded temps DerBauer got. They sacrificed temps to preserve cooler compatibility but they may have gone too far.
You can’t have everything in the world.
I even think the change to PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 were expensive enough. If they changed the state of cooling people would really be pissed.
literally just got done installing a Arctic Liquid Freezer III 360 AIO on my 7900x. I'll have to wait til tomorrow to see what the temps look like though because it turns out my psu's cables are too short for the new case I also bought, lol. I had to order extension cables on Amazon.
The real solution is to get the non X version @65 watts so what if the base clock is 3.7 compared to 4.7 you can still overclock it. I've never been a fan of these big coolers.
Sure, it’s always just a question of if you really need the performance
3:31 still a very impressive result considering how small this thing is
Thank you for an interesting video. I have the ryzen 7900X, unlike other ryzens I have not undervolted or overclocked. I cooled it with thermaltake double tower, and temps idle at 45C under max load reached 85C. It makes me wonder what is the big fuss about temp control of these 7000 CPUs.
we knew this anyway but can we just take a moment to appreciate what a fucking BEAST the nh-d15 is
Pretty sure u don't need to add ambient temp on top of what's getting reported.. The Temp is the temp reported.. And under volting actually increased my cinebench score
This test makes absolutely no sense. See hardware Canucks vidéo.
95 degrees is a target (frequency is adjusted to match this target, even with the best cooler you can get 95 deg, but with a larger frequency).
Fixing the voltage makes no sense with these CPU as they can automatically adjust it to what they need.
Only changing the values of the curve optimizer, and the throttle temperature makes sense. You can change the throttle target to 70 deg if you want, with any cooler, and you will just have a lower frequency than with a target at 95 deg. For most applications having 5.2 instead of 5.5 GHz will not be a big deal.
Still waiting for the next gen NH-D15. [sigh].
I do plan a 9ooo series, 16 cores, Zen 5 on AM5, and the plan is to set it to self regulate and clock when & where and how it can, and if it gets to 95 ~ well throttle down already! I don't plan to manually clock the thing up & over-volt it just to see what happens. It's designed to run at 95 and self-regulate to stay about there, when loaded. That sounds fine, but when you manually set clocks and voltages and stuff to show how hot it gets, you're breaking that self management and regulation it is designed to do. It's a little bit like jamming the thermostat in your car and then complaining that it boils. That's the sort of thing Top Gear did, not a real car show ~
I have 7900x with Dark Rock Pro 4 air cooler, H7 Flow case with 2x PWM fans, 140mm front and 120mm rear. Cinebench R23, 10 min 100% CPU workload, temp got up to 94 C. My test show that it is about the case and the CPU cooler. The fans can reduce a few degrees but not much. AMD says clearly that 95 C is tjmax but not the limit for power. So it is a safe working 24/7 temp. without reducing efficiency or risking damaging the cpu.
Just run new test with everything closed. Max temp of cores, 92.9 C, one CCD got to 95 for a fraction of a second. Most of the cores never passed 80 C. So, Dark Rock can cool it just fine, if you have a mesh case with solid airflow.
Same case and same cooler here, confirmed this. I also have 2 case fans, one in front and one in back. Being satisfied with temps I decided to gift my pc 2 more coolers in front, just waiting my fan splitter to arive. The front of h7 case is like ice cold always and pulling in fresh air. That is realy one amazing case.
@@vladasimovic2732was looking to get a nice case for this for air cooling. Thinking about the fractal north. Do you think that would be a good fit for it? also thinking about a fractal north xl but I'm worried a bit about space
@@TheSpineOfTheWorld Hi, tbh I don't remember quite clearly about the specs for Fractal North. The cases are great, but you should consider the width for air cooler. It should be at least a little wider when considering MB, CPU and cooler. Safe bet would be 5cm wider I think, but I saw some people fitting it quite tight and having no problem. Also, consider the length if you have big GPU. Mine is 4090 so it is HUGE. So far, I am really happy with my setup. Hope I helped at least a little...
been looking at an artic cooler to cool the 7900x im fixing to grab. Guess thats what ill go with.
7900x is on sale on amazon btw.
Deepcool AK620 deserves to be tested...
Wondering how the arctic 280 did better then the 360 version. By physics the 360 should be better.
Same here
Because the cooling performance of different coolers in relation to one another can change depending on the amount of heat.
This is also not exclusive to Water coolers. Take Noctua's NH-D15 & U12A. Depending on the load, the U12A (can) outperform a D15. But turn the heat up and the D15 will be far in front of a U12.
The list you are referring too was created using a 3900x that pushes 135W. And the order of cooler on that list is exclusive for that very specific use case. Change the CPU, change the load, and the order can switch. Keep in mind that the list will not "change" but coolers that perform quite similarly might switch places.
We used that list to have an "indication" of what to expect. And because that list would not apply directly to the 7900x, we removed the actual numbers.
I pulled up the excel sheet where I have all the cooling numbers for all Ryzen 7000 chips.
The 360 vs 280 problem comes up with those chips too.
Temp normalized to 23°:
LF 360 7600x -> 76,4°C ( .4°C better)
LF 280 7600x -> 77°C
LF 360 7900x -> 82,9°C (.5°C worse)
LF 280 7900x -> 82,4°C
So if I would have created "real" benchmark lists for every cooler in combination with every Ryzen chip, depending on the chip, the coolers would have switched places.
For any benchmark charts that you see out there, you should take them only as sort of an indication how a cooler will perform compared to other ones. But it's never an exact value if you do not happen to have the exact same system. Most of the times such a list will be somewhat accurate. But keep in mind that things might be open to minimal changes.
I've seen a dozen Reddit posts of people asking about a LF 280 vs LF 360 comparison. Then someone posts my video under it, accompanied by an army of people referring to Gamers Nexus video and calling me out for not having 1-1 the same results. What everybody forgets there is that GM pushed almost 200W through their coolers, we are doing (only) 130. And what can happen here is that the results at the top end will start to get squished together and sometimes a bit blurry.
I did my very best to find an example for this other than myself as a source. Surprisingly, I did not find a single person that did a complete Arctic Lineup comparison using different loads.
The closest thing I could find is Anandtech and their LF 420 Review.
They did a bunch of graphs at different loads using various coolers.
images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph16427/120490.png -> 200W
images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph16427/120491.png -> 250W
images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph16427/120492.png -> 340W
Ignore the LF 240 and keep an eye on the LF 420 vs Alphacool 360.
For 200W, the LF 420 had the first spot. Not by a lot though.
For 250W, the Alphacool took over. Again by a tiny amount.
At 340W, the difference became quite big.
And this is the exact same thing. They switched places because the load changed.
But, the trend of the graph is still applicable regardless of the load. At any point, both coolers were at the top, and a lot better compared to the last few ones.
Just don't take these numbers 1-1. Look where they stand +- compared to everything else.
Sorry for the enormous answer. I'm shocked myself. Just got this question way to often over the last few months and wanted to answer it once and for all.
Hope this helped :)
@@STSYT thank you for the detailed reply helps a lot. By the way I was not questioning your testing mythology or results. First video I have seen of yours and just by basic knowledge of how heat/cooling works I figured 360 should of been better
hey i didn't see the 420 listed in your chart.. Just curious - Did you see any improvements with the big 420 rad? Also if i'm reading this right, you saw better temps on the 280 vs the 360 ? (arctic liquid freeze II). currently upgrading me 7700k to either: 12900k, 13700k, or 7900x. currently running a 280 rad, but can fit a 420 if there are some actual improvements, not just 1-2c.
cooler master 240m lite also working like a charm on a 7900x. Used here in Spain (pretty warm)
Hey, thanks for the video, it's exactly what I was looking for in making a decision for my 7900x. One question thought, why is there a difference between the top 2 coolers? Aren't they the same model + extra RGB lights on one of them? I'm looking to buy one of them, but the RGB part is throwing me off haha. I'm not really interested in the lights, but if it runs cooler, why not. :)
the 7900 instead of 7900x is a better option. Lower wattage and heat dissipation out of the box with decent performance + ability to over clock and match the max boost that of the 7900x a win win.
I have 7900X with AK400 cooler, I can get 5.4 GHZ all cores with a -35 curve optimizer and target temperature of 85 degrees. Cinebench R23 score of slightly above 30000.
If I change the cooler I may get 100 or 200 more MHz, this is not a bit deal at all.
wow, I would be very grateful if you could show me how to set in bios...❤
I would also like to see how you set this up if you have any tutorials you know of
Hi, where did the Arctic liquid cool ii 240 sit on the graph? I have a 7900x in a Li Lan 215, there's only reasonable room for the 240mm.
should work fine. No heavy OC, but works fine out of the box
Hey man! I wanted to just ask because i am going with the 7900x and im getting the arctic liquid freezer II 360mm for about 50 euros because my freind is selling it for me and it hasnt been used at all and i will pair it with the 7900x so is that good?
Would be interesting to see if the DeepCool Assassin III could tame this beast
Did you try using the Noctua offset bracket?
Hi, I just bought a Ryezn 7900x with a Noctua NH-D15, what thermal paste did you use in your tests or what is the best one I can use? Thank you!
Hey, what temps are you getting?
While gaming and basic browsing?
I wish you could also test id-cooling. Xilence sorta reminds me of them.... Also fairly cheap, but decent in some variants.
Now what I read from this video - I can undervolt 7900x and use 32eur cooler with this in my mITX case - fingers crossed ⚔️ ))
I guess the outcome is to use a water cooler. They tend to be expensive and also need the right type of case to mount them. I currently have 12600k and that runs great with a tower cooler so cant see me changing soon.
Or, A D15, a Peerless Assassin 120, etc. You really really do not have to spend a ton of money on an AIO. A 35 dollar PA120 will be fine for the vast majority of users. If you work in a naturally hot environment, and while in that environment regularly pump your CPU to its max for long durations, yes, get an AIO, but if the answer to one or all of those is "no", stop wasting money.
Great video as always. It's interesting, how difficult it will be for aircoolers to handle 13.gen. It's a bit harder to cool AMD 7xxx series, because of this chiplet design, maybe those aircooler will have better luck with Intel. I meah, Xilence can handle 220W of TDP, it should be enough to cool 13600K, at least on paper.
will my chip be ok if i only game on it with a lower end cooler master, not looking for it to be mega cool just below 90
Can you please shed a light whether a DeepCool AS500 PLUS can handle 7900X? Different resources state that AS500 is almost as powerful as Noctua DH-15. Could a big bang for a buck.
Noted
For the socket Ryzen 9 7900x is it AM5 ? You can’t use an AM4 for the aio liquid cooler ?
Hey man not sure if this is because later updates but I cant get my 7900x to run past 95c even If I wanted to, seems like it just throttles at this temp. How are you even getting temps of 108c?
It’s been a while, but I believe to remember that we could just adjust TjMax in bios. Never Z and X boards can do that, and I think that’s also how we did it back then
@@STSYT thanks brother
Great video
Peerless Assassin 120 and AK620 need some attention.
Noted
PA120 performs almost identical across the board with the D15. Just take the D15 results, and bam, you got the PA120 results within margin of error.
Idk how I see so many state that the 7900x gets super hot. I have a 7900x with the nzxt kraken elite 360 rgb 3 fan. The highest I've seen it get in full high settings is 70-73c gaming 6hrs. I also have the nzxt elite flow case with 3 big front fans. Idk if I'm just lucky but I never reach above 83
My noctua NH-U12S-SE managed 97°C in prime 95 stress test after 30 minutes of waiting so I think its ok with me because I just use the eco mode anyway :) plenty of power for me
Shouldn't it be 95c all the time?
@@thealien_ali3382 not with eco mode. it takes less power and doesnt get so hot. in eco mode it runs at 45-50°C if im just wathcing youtube or not doing anything and only uses 45-50 Watts of energy
Great video! I'm tired of all these reviewers using 360 AIO like this would be some kind of common cooling everyone is using.
I wish you would add SilentiumPC coolers - probably cheap and very good.
Temperature is one thing but what about throttling? Noctura can keep it under 96C great, but what about clocks?
So your saying i need to go water cooled...
I ve orderd an corsair aio 280 but I will cancel my order and buy the dark rock 4 pro. I have the 500fx case with 3 x12 12 front fans and 1x14 rear and 1x14 upper exhaust fan will be ok.
well for me second fan for nh-d15 didn't fit, so yeah, not great. At the beginning I had water cooler but it didn't cool that beast, that when I decided to buy best air cooler)
correction: added case fans to optimize case airflow - now NH-D15 tamed that CPU)
Cooler master H412R is good for Ryzen 9 7900x?????
No idea, but just by looking at the pictures, I highly doubt
Strange BIOS setups for these chips. I'm wondering already if they'll be like the 5800X. It was discovered that the 5800X is overvolted by most Mobo makers. If you do a negative voltage offset on a 5800X and manually set the PBO to +200, they will boost to about 5.1ghz and still run about 8 to 10c cooler on my NH-U14S.... I'm wondering if the same will apply to these new Zen 4 and they are simply set up crazy.
I predict a wave of undervolting videos for new GPUs and CPUs.
what kinda negative voltage offset? Like where should the voltage be set at?
@@johnphillip1711 I was doing -0.7 in my BIOS. Now I'm lazy and just turn on eco mode, it does the same thing...
@@MrEricmopar thank you
Laughs in 7900x3d 120 TDP
need link for that graph chart. unable to see text clearly in the video
Negative curve optimizer seems to be the way forward for am5
Not sure if this is due to the thicker ihs as explained in der8auer
Who 7900x won’t work in a cooler master ncore max case. It comes with a 120mm fanned custom 38mm radiator…..
Does it push 175w on all cores at base clock or boosted clock?.
Base, at best. Boost goes a lot higher
Didn't test AK620? Very disappointed.
Is on our to do list
@@STSYT nice
Please Have you tested the deepcool AK620
Just build 7900x with deepcool mystique (85-87c)
hello what thermal paste for water coolers??????
im running the be quiet rock pro 4 with 7900x and yea it does get hot, but in gaming alone its perfecly stable at around 60% - 70%temps. i may need to get a watercooler but i dont like having loud fans in my system. anyone can reccmomend me a quiet water cooler?
Percentage temps? What does that mean? Or do you mean Celsius?
Hi, did you upgrade to a water cooler? I am torn to go for a water cooler for the first time ever for my AMD 7800x3d
i just can't get it, at idle +browsing at 15% cpu load, i have 85°C with beefy aircooling...so disapointed
I guess all of the low profile coolers should be dead except for dark rock tf2
my H115i RGB PRO XT is just able to barely keep it at 95c
can a arctic freezer esport duo cool a 5800x3d for gaming?
Yes
30 square feet ?
6:52 why aren't there any numbers on the graph?
Because you skipped the intro which explains how to understand the graph
@@STSYT Thanks for helping me unsubscribe.
Assassin IV?
you just need more thermal paste brah.
95.3 is 203 f I'm mot putting that on a mother board
Anyone uses a perless assassin se?
Der bauer new delid way
Look have a 👍
You sound German