What's most impressive is that even the cheapest version has the full safety suite - and adaptive cruise control...!!! What it looses out on is that is does not have a center airbag between the two front seats which the Yaris (5 star) has.
Or central vents like the current one. Let's hope they've finally sorted out the leaky boot! Should of turbo charged it. I'll probably get a i10 1.2 next.
@@raymondk2202with respect how do you explain why my 2016 Peugeot 108 leaked, not to mention all the RUclips videos dealing with similar leaks on the first generation models?
Now just to answer that. Toyota and Peugeot are different, they are the same model,yes.But Peugeot didn't fix that issue only Toyota did. Maybe you could get your car fixed, the same way Toyota did it. {Hope this didn't sound rude}
@@serenan920 not necessarily badly made, they just used cheap materials so the car itself could be sold for cheap. That's the whole point of cars like these. Add to that how immensely reliable and fuel efficient they are and it's no wonder they are so popular
good for the price ? you stupid its £15k cheapest and just look at it in a crash if you were in a 50-60mph crash in this thing that A-Pillar going to give up and you will be killed.
I find it so impressive that Toyota puts its Toyota Safety Sense standard on all its car. Luxury car sometimes makes customers pay extra for those. It’s just like what they did back in 2010 by making their STAR Safety System as standard.
You won't regret it this cars given me such confidence It's a go kart! Sadly acceleration can be slow but otherwise it slows down if you get some idiot randomly breaking I left 3 car len and held back and still nearly went up the back of someone cause they shit themselves on a bend and then they kept doing it in my 2005 yards I would have been up the rear end swear the gut was doing crash for cash
@@serenan920 Here you can see an Opel/Vauxhall crashing into the back of a Prius, The Prius is Toast, with the Vauxhall not even the doors are jammed. ruclips.net/video/jqcVjybTxHQ/видео.html In my opinion Toyota is highly overrated.
I think the ncaps are now a bit too strict with their stuff. A centre airbag is lovely but the rating should be determined on injuries. In Australia the mg3 is the most popular light car but they won’t test it because it doesn’t have a centre airbag 😭
Am I just not seeing it? The A pillar looks pretty sturdy from what I can tell, seems to be mostly the door warping (not that it's excusable) - purely wondering but can you help me pin point what to look for?
@@JackpodyDK At 0:23 you can see the roof crumbling and intrusion of the steering wheel. Just compare for example with the Mitsubishi Mirage, there you see no intrusion.
Not my car, the massive A-pillar failure in offset crash shows the drivers compartment on the edge of collapsing. Just look at the intrusions at 0:22 I think Toyota needs to redesign. Beyond this speed no airbags will help you. Even the Mitsubishi Mirage performs better.
@@henningth.3704 That Euro NCAP specialists are probing through this data and that they specifically write for the now dated Mitsubishi Mirage (RESULTS EXPIRED) meaning they no longer consider the test methodology valid. The NCAP engineers use measurements, accelerometers etc to determine driver-protection. Maybe the A-pillar didn't fail the way you estimate from eye-balling a vid? Perhaps some of the vibrations are intentional to redirect the energy elsewhere? Idk. It is you who postulate that "Even the Mits Mirage performs better" from a little bit of eye-balling it would seem but NCAP seem to grant the Aygo X a pass and note passenger compartment is stable, but also do note that driver protection could be better and therefore, it is not granted a maximum 5 stars. It is not easy for microcars these days to get 5 stars, only the fiat 500E and aygo x managed 4 whereas hyundai and vw got 3 (in tests NCAP consider still valid). Stating a now 10 year old car is safer in a frontal impact at x speed from a visual judgment, whereas the ncap engineers use far more info than that in their judgments imo seems a less than solid thing to conclude from. Generally speaking, people keen on crash safety should probably buy a car no smaller than a supermini and definately not an old microcar like the Mirage anyhow.
Because as soon as they stop testing for it, the automakers will almost certainly find a way to cut costs while passing the other tests. We saw this with the offset tests, when that started many companies only reinforced the side that was being tested at the time. Anything to save a dollar
Ich bin der Meinung, das crash Test soll jedes Jahr +1 km h dazu zählen. Damit die Autohersteller die Autos ständig verbessern, was das Schutz von Insassen angeht. Viele Autohersteller passen die Autos genau so ganz knapp an crash Test ohne Rücksicht auf echte Schutz von Insassen. Nur Volvo kümmert sich tatsächlich um Sicherheit.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
What's most impressive is that even the cheapest version has the full safety suite - and adaptive cruise control...!!! What it looses out on is that is does not have a center airbag between the two front seats which the Yaris (5 star) has.
Or central vents like the current one. Let's hope they've finally sorted out the leaky boot! Should of turbo charged it. I'll probably get a i10 1.2 next.
@@rob5944 the leaky booth was already sorted out as soon as it was discovered as a structural issue back in 2014
@@raymondk2202with respect how do you explain why my 2016 Peugeot 108 leaked, not to mention all the RUclips videos dealing with similar leaks on the first generation models?
Now just to answer that.
Toyota and Peugeot are different, they are the same model,yes.But Peugeot didn't fix that issue only Toyota did.
Maybe you could get your car fixed, the same way Toyota did it.
{Hope this didn't sound rude}
The car did really good, for the class and the price range 👏
Yes👏👏
So badly made not funny. More plastic and glass. We should not import
@@serenan920 not necessarily badly made, they just used cheap materials so the car itself could be sold for cheap. That's the whole point of cars like these. Add to that how immensely reliable and fuel efficient they are and it's no wonder they are so popular
good for the price ? you stupid its £15k cheapest and just look at it in a crash if you were in a 50-60mph crash in this thing that A-Pillar going to give up and you will be killed.
I find it so impressive that Toyota puts its Toyota Safety Sense standard on all its car. Luxury car sometimes makes customers pay extra for those. It’s just like what they did back in 2010 by making their STAR Safety System as standard.
Yes, but it is so weak
Thats because they are "luxury" cars - people buy them because they are expensive
The level of safety is impressive, this definitely convinced me to order mine.
You won't regret it this cars given me such confidence It's a go kart! Sadly acceleration can be slow but otherwise it slows down if you get some idiot randomly breaking I left 3 car len and held back and still nearly went up the back of someone cause they shit themselves on a bend and then they kept doing it in my 2005 yards I would have been up the rear end swear the gut was doing crash for cash
1:51 "Don't worry for me, I am OK, I am OK !"
Very impressive AEB system!
Does better than bigger cars
Better than the Mercedes c claas
Exactly.
Omg loved it!
3 mounths and i got my Toyota Aygo x
How pedestrian score is only 74 even the car didn´t hit anything ?
It goes on the head and leg impacts earlier on in the video
They do the AEB tests a lot of times, some of the scoring goes down to consistency of stopping
There are for sure other parameters. It's not 100 if you don't hit pedestrian and 0 if you hit him.
When will you start including rear end collisions @Euroncap? Whiplash is just not sufficient as I would like to see rear integrity/intrusion as well.
4 stars lmfao. 1 max
This would fail any rear end crash
@@serenan920 Here you can see an Opel/Vauxhall crashing into the back of a Prius, The Prius is Toast, with the Vauxhall not even the doors are jammed.
ruclips.net/video/jqcVjybTxHQ/видео.html
In my opinion Toyota is highly overrated.
I think the ncaps are now a bit too strict with their stuff. A centre airbag is lovely but the rating should be determined on injuries. In Australia the mg3 is the most popular light car but they won’t test it because it doesn’t have a centre airbag 😭
That is not the reason.
@@Mi82475 I’m talking about australia NCAP.
Centre airbag? Wtf is a centre airbag?
@@gravemind6536 check yaris 2020 tests
First car in a long time to have such massive A-pillar failure in a frontal offset crash. Wouldn't want to be crashing it faster than this.
Great, I am not the only one to realize!
0:22 Here you can see the massive intrusions following the failure.
Am I just not seeing it? The A pillar looks pretty sturdy from what I can tell, seems to be mostly the door warping (not that it's excusable) - purely wondering but can you help me pin point what to look for?
@@JackpodyDK Same, it honestly doesn't look too bad.
@@JackpodyDK At 0:23 you can see the roof crumbling and intrusion of the steering wheel.
Just compare for example with the Mitsubishi Mirage, there you see no intrusion.
So bad, not funny. Cheapest Chinese steel. No protection at all really
Any tall people own these? Im 6 foot 6 or 2 metres tall, i would love to know if i could fit in one?
fun fact this car in malaysia perodua said its can be a new perodua axia 2023 thank for the toyota and daihatsu 😊😂 i like they back lamp amazing
Not my car, the massive A-pillar failure in offset crash shows the drivers compartment on the edge of collapsing.
Just look at the intrusions at 0:22
I think Toyota needs to redesign.
Beyond this speed no airbags will help you.
Even the Mitsubishi Mirage performs better.
then get a Mitsubishi Mirage
There is zero chance a Mitsubishi Mirage is better in any safety category. Like zero at all.
@@emilsohn1671 Your assumption is based on what?
@@henningth.3704 That Euro NCAP specialists are probing through this data and that they specifically write for the now dated Mitsubishi Mirage (RESULTS EXPIRED) meaning they no longer consider the test methodology valid.
The NCAP engineers use measurements, accelerometers etc to determine driver-protection. Maybe the A-pillar didn't fail the way you estimate from eye-balling a vid? Perhaps some of the vibrations are intentional to redirect the energy elsewhere? Idk. It is you who postulate that "Even the Mits Mirage performs better" from a little bit of eye-balling it would seem but NCAP seem to grant the Aygo X a pass and note passenger compartment is stable, but also do note that driver protection could be better and therefore, it is not granted a maximum 5 stars. It is not easy for microcars these days to get 5 stars, only the fiat 500E and aygo x managed 4 whereas hyundai and vw got 3 (in tests NCAP consider still valid).
Stating a now 10 year old car is safer in a frontal impact at x speed from a visual judgment, whereas the ncap engineers use far more info than that in their judgments imo seems a less than solid thing to conclude from.
Generally speaking, people keen on crash safety should probably buy a car no smaller than a supermini and definately not an old microcar like the Mirage anyhow.
Agree unacceptably weak
Why did that side mobile barrier test seemed so aggressive compared to other cars?
Weight probably, the MDB is likely the weight of an average car across all of them, and the aygo x is a supermini
Axia baru ke ni
So the video has two sections: « intro » and « the third reich ». WTF???
Rear end crash test?
Nice economy car for city but small boot
AEB system works better than the AEB in the Mercedes C class:D
Very impressive
can’t imagine why they’re still doing the full frontal test in 2022.
Because as soon as they stop testing for it, the automakers will almost certainly find a way to cut costs while passing the other tests. We saw this with the offset tests, when that started many companies only reinforced the side that was being tested at the time.
Anything to save a dollar
maybe because in 2022 you can have a full frontal accident?
This car's design is based on the new Toyota Yaris Cross
Shotty spying in every car today
Bu arabanın çarpışma testinde 4 yıldızda kalması beni çok şaşırtmadı
Im 13 yrs old but i want to learn how to drive my height is 5'8 and the car is amazing 😍😍😍
The front end is way too weak
Ich bin der Meinung, das crash Test soll jedes Jahr +1 km h dazu zählen. Damit die Autohersteller die Autos ständig verbessern, was das Schutz von Insassen angeht. Viele Autohersteller passen die Autos genau so ganz knapp an crash Test ohne Rücksicht auf echte Schutz von Insassen. Nur Volvo kümmert sich tatsächlich um Sicherheit.
The aeb sounds like a microwave
True
ilk ab
Very weak car in my opinion. Is too expensive for 1.0 L and 4 stars. And it is also 21.000$.
really ? I 've thought you can buy it for 19 K with a good level of amenities !
name better for less price... brand new this is literally cheapest / best option
You can buy Hyundai Elantra 2023 at 20k euro not this shit.
The Aygo is a awful car!
Why do you say this? Explain please...
Kindly feck orf.