1 Month With the M4 Pro Mac mini | Adobe Lightroom, Photoshop and Final Cut Pro Workflow!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
  • I upgraded roughly a month ago from the M2 Pro Mac mini. I've been using the new M4 Pro Mac mini for my daily work (commercial photography/video) for corporate clients.
    In my experience the M4 Pro is delivering 40+ % in performance with my usual tasks.
    It's driving a Sharp 32" 4K monitor and an LG HD monitor that I use for color proofing/baseline editing. I'm also using a RAID drive and several external drives from SSD to Mechanical.
    Background Music
    ===============
    Free Music for Videos 👉 Music by Marv Krown - gettin' hard - thmatc.co/?l=C...
    Free Music for Videos 👉 Music by Marv Krown - on the move - thmatc.co/?l=1...
    Free Music for Videos 👉 Music by Marv Krown - pin point - thmatc.co/?l=A...

Комментарии • 5

  • @androidfarmer8863
    @androidfarmer8863 26 дней назад +1

    What configuration? RAM?

    • @techonthemove
      @techonthemove  26 дней назад +1

      Basic M4 Pro. 24GB ram, 512GB SSD and 12 core CPU

    • @androidfarmer8863
      @androidfarmer8863 25 дней назад

      @@techonthemove Thanks! I'd love to know what your Activity Numbers look like, especially if you have a few more apps open, like I usually do, even though I should probably close some things. It probably wouldn't be something I'd ask if we were able to add more RAM.

    • @techonthemove
      @techonthemove  25 дней назад +1

      @@androidfarmer8863 Really good question. I didn't really think about that too much but went back and checked it out. rarely did the "idle" numbers drop below 70% even under load from rendering or export in FCP. I ran that with 2 Chrome tabs open, Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom running in the background with a large retouching file opened.
      The scene changed a bit when generating 1:1 previews in Lightroom though. The activity rose to 50% and the swap file increased to around 6GB. It was momentary though as rendering those previews for 30 medium format images (100MB) was super fast.
      I'm guessing there is more optimization going on in FCP..Adobe has always been slow to do the same. I spent thousands of dollars on high end Windows PCs trying to get Lightroom to hurry up.

    • @androidfarmer8863
      @androidfarmer8863 25 дней назад

      @@techonthemove Great info. Thanks again. I think I'd probably hesitate less in going for more RAM if that configuration was available off-the-shelf in a local store. Hmm...