@@YonatanLidar I honestly think Roland did an amazing work to recreate an ultimate Juno comeback. There is absolute no need for analogue or hybride technology in this case. And if Roland would have needed to add some analogue into it I guess they would but that would raise the pricetag a bit and make it impossible to have high voice count for a reasonable price tag.
You know your way around that pretty quick. I have the JupiterX, but I take a peek here and there on the JunoX. I kind of wish it had the 60 built in. I guess I should be lucky theres a native 106 in it at all.
More noises, should be presented differently. I think that the instrument is much more complex than the noises made. Only from the 8th minute there were a few seconds of what he could do.
Totally different synth. Very capable, but build quality is less, and you cant add on additional sounds from a cloud source or modelers. As well as sound stacking, drum machines, and other high end features for a flagship model. Deepmind is great for entry level price points, but its not meant to compete at this tier.
Built in speakers??🤣🤣🤣...they are only 5w each, that's wank!!! They should have been at least 20w each for the price you pay for it!! I almost bought one, until I learned you had to pay a subscription of about £80-90 a year for the extra multitude of synths.... (which will not work once your subscription has timed out. They go on 'hold' till you pay up again. So, I bought Behringer Deepmind 12 instead and saved a Grand!
It's a wonderful digital synthesizer.
no one can tell the difference on a recording LOL
@@YonatanLidar I honestly think Roland did an amazing work to recreate an ultimate Juno comeback. There is absolute no need for analogue or hybride technology in this case. And if Roland would have needed to add some analogue into it I guess they would but that would raise the pricetag a bit and make it impossible to have high voice count for a reasonable price tag.
Nice demonstration, very useful 👍
You know your way around that pretty quick. I have the JupiterX, but I take a peek here and there on the JunoX. I kind of wish it had the 60 built in. I guess I should be lucky theres a native 106 in it at all.
Can you please share details of this split at roughly 11:15? It's beautiful
Fantastic synth 💚
This looks like a well balanced, versatile and attractive synth. And it has excellent S/N ratio right?
Great demo, looks like a brilliant synth regardless of what the hipsters say
TOP!
😊
Juno 106 always sounds the best because it’s magical
As for the ‘vintage mode‘: can DCOs really get out of tune after some decades?
More noises, should be presented differently. I think that the instrument is much more complex than the noises made. Only from the 8th minute there were a few seconds of what he could do.
What about the deepmind 12 lol
Totally different synth. Very capable, but build quality is less, and you cant add on additional sounds from a cloud source or modelers. As well as sound stacking, drum machines, and other high end features for a flagship model. Deepmind is great for entry level price points, but its not meant to compete at this tier.
@@FanaticDrummer I would agree.
Ive owned a J6, J60, J106, Jupiter 8. Damn id be rich if I still owned them lol
Naja so viel mehr macht er auch nicht als viele ältere Modelle und anderer Hersteller...😉
Built in speakers??🤣🤣🤣...they are only 5w each, that's wank!!! They should have been at least 20w each for the price you pay for it!!
I almost bought one, until I learned you had to pay a subscription of about £80-90 a year for the extra multitude of synths.... (which will not work once your subscription has timed out. They go on 'hold' till you pay up again. So, I bought Behringer Deepmind 12 instead and saved a Grand!