most popular general in history known for his exceptional genius in miliary tactics vs some dude known for his atrocities towards the jews. i think the winner is clear.
@@PrVecXD_innovations, tactics, strategies, battles won, battles fought, better leader, feats, casualties - all say napoleon is better than Austrian painter
@@PrVecXD_ Idk why tf thes guys are mentioning tanks and airforce, this is not a real war, just a comparison, tanks and Airforce will come under one word (factor) "Technology", and I am pretty sure that the French would dominate in other factors
Historical fun fact: The Austrian mustachioed man was inspired by Napoleon. Napoleon was inspired by Caesar. Caesar was inspired by Alexander the Great. Alexander the Great was inspired by Achilles. And Achilles wasn't a real person.
Literally Napoleon is so goated that it took several countries to beat him and they got defeated numerous times before managing a win, the funny part is that they where so scared of him being alive that they sealed his corpse within several coffins.
@@kingdragonthefirst4686 No he had fought against Austria, Prussia, Russia, and Great Britain which for 1800's are the superpowers at that time, he fended them off simultaneously and even with a weakened french army they still lost badly, one of their tactics at that time when they see Napoleon was to run and not engage him head on...
@@Capin-Crunch It's more his practice. Since there was a case when he praised the useless Austrian general, who lost to him, and thanks to this, the Austrians decided that since this general surprised Napoleon himself, then he should probably be re-appointed commander-in-chief.
I have an old book that states the quote below was said by the same painter: “ _A dictator is like a bicycle driver. If he/she stops, then he/she will fall_ “
How so?germany was the one who started the war with the invasion of poland but then the uk and france declared war on germany so technically germany started the war by invading poland which made them declare war.@@yasinneysari
@@sharlockborls6308 poland and some land was part of Germany before ww1. Germany just wants their own land that had been lost in the treaty of Versailles. Germany needed that land for space of living because the population of Germany was so high and resources are so low. Germany didn't want to conquer the world. This is a big lie. So balance of power just was an excuse. And the UK and france shouldn't be declared a war. In addition,even your biggest enemy wants peace you should accept. Germany gave so many big proposals to stop war. He didn't attack Dunkirk just for peace. But uk shout out "i want war" . Germany started a war to survive. Even if it started the war, it didn't start ww2.
But if we are being honest, a lot of engagements for the mustache man weren’t taken into account with the ‘less than 10’ scoring. Look at events like Bialystok, Minsk, Narva, Hungary, Warsaw, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Paris, Kiev, Sevastopol, etc. I doubt it scaled up to 53, but probably damn near close
@perseus274I wouldn't call him a nazi, but i agree with your initial statement. I hate people who are obviously uneducated in a certain subject and just say common shit you'd find on Facebook. Like bro, if you're gonna comment on a subject, you best have common knowledge before you say random shit.
@thetanmanmcg6378 It's just a theory/meme. Also you think Napoleon fan (who's romantically attracted to Napoleon) would think he actually said that?? Lmao I think you're the one who should be educating themselves
Thats an meaningless meme quote, it doesn't have any meaning, its just a random phrase that can be utter by anyone. The better one is "Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily"
to be fqir when hes was exiled for the first time he came back and the second place he was exiled to was a rock floating in the atlantics ocean thousands of kilometers away from a landmass my man also had 2 ships and 2000 men constantly guard him
@@painvillegaming4119 might i also point out that like 4 empires declared war not on france but fucking napoleon himself. like napoleon was that much of a menace
@HansLanza tf you talking about? they obvs didnt want a war and even more they didnt want a russian german joint invasion since the soviets were their allies
The Russian empire and the mongol empire did not co exist. Mongols conquered the small tribes that consisted of the Russian empire in later years not the Russian empire itself.
@@raUser9982Stalin wasn't a great leader, in war he only won because of the help from his allies through men and food supplies, he won only because of army numbers instead of good strategies, he held back the Soviet union' economy and population by using communism instead of capitalism and his ideology (communism) has failed and is now on life support in the countries that matter (not to mention that unlike H1tl3r the USSR won the war and he had nothing holding him back from spreading communism)
but Hitler wanted to destroy Russia, and Napoleon simply wanted us not to trade with Britain... Napoleon was many times taller than Hitler, maybe not in height, but in soul and mind.
Ephesians 6:10-18 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; and your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints. The bible is no old book. You have to really let Christ open your eyes; to see the world in shambles. Many people say it's a religion to lock up people in chains, and say it's a rule book.. why? Because people hate hearing the truth, it hurts their flesh, it's hurts their pride, it's exposes on what things have they done..people love this world so much, s*x, money, power, women, supercars.. things of this world. Still trying to find something that can fill that emptiness in your heart. You can't find that in this world.. only in Christ, the bible is no chains, it's a chainbreaker. Breaking your sins into pieces... Repent now, and turn back to the true Lord only.. God bless.😊😊😊😊
@@jaguarbrave8453 Le fait qu'ils aient tous pratiqué l'esclavage annule donc le fait qu'Haïti soit un génocide ? Le fait que tout le monde ait pratiqué l'esclavage annule tout ce que les Espagnols ont fait dans les Amériques lorsqu'ils y sont arrivés ?
@@jaguarbrave8453 Bien que les Français aient aboli l'esclavage, Napoléon était favorable à l'esclavage et a même envoyé des troupes pour mettre fin à la révolution en Haïti,
@@Jan.jan2024please remember that the best german general is blucher, and he himself got defeated 4 times in a single campagin against napoleon alone, napoleon also has several of the greatest french generals like jean-baptise jourdan, andre massena, davout and much more, rommel or manstein or any german general wouldnt win if they face them in a 1v1 or even a 1v2.
@@Jan.jan2024Rather depends on the size of the army. If there were only a couple of battalions or divisions, Napaleon would have won. Because I think within a couple of weeks or even days, Napaleon would have fully studied the technologies of the 20th century. It turns out that the larger armies collide, the higher the chance of victory for the Austrian and the lower Napaleon, and vice versa, the smaller the troops, the higher the chance of victory for Napaleon
The fact that his peak army size is so much higher than napoleon yet still he won less battles then napoleon, just shows how much strategy napoleon had
Tenía menos soldados ya que son otras épocas, en los tiempos de napoleón esa cantidad era enorme y en los tiempos del pintor esos números eran los normales
"Normal" obviously Revolutionary France adopted massive draft as one of the first nations, but its not Napoleons ingenuity that lead to that draft to be adopted. And other countries did so too. Especially Prussia. Moreover in the time of the "painter" he still had one of the biggest draft rates up to the manpower pool being depleted. @@DROLEAN755
Napoléon was in Moscow, he left russia by himself because the russian burn Moscow so no food, water and Somewhere to rest, and when Napoléon was in russia there is a volcano that blow up in oceania and the rumor Say that Napoléon Lost because of the volcano.
@@PyrrhusHLhe didn't left moskow by himself... if he stayed there for 2 more days, then they'd be surrounded by russians... and napoleon didn't have enough forces to fight against russians any further... so he was forced to leave... but his entire army got destroyed during the invasion and he got defeated at the end
@user-f49kyyo8u he wasn't really that evil, coalition forces were the real evils who wanted to suppress the French Revolution because they don't want their people to be inspired by French Revolution and rise against them
Napoleon was one of the greatest military generals of all time, having speed, element of surprise, and great tactics. Sad that he had to spend the rest of his life in St. Helena
Napoleon is known as one of the greatest millitary generals rarely losing every battle he faces Many of his 26 marshals are also famous generals who won several battles for example Michel Ney
Not only his Marshals, but his generals many who were better than some marshals were very gifted men. Vandamme, Saint-Hilaire, Kellermann who actually was the one who saved the battle of Marengo. Dupont, Gudin, Lasalle, Kleber, Moreau,any more who at one point served under him could've been greater than Ney and many others.
Gloire à la Pologne et aux troupes de Józef Poniatowski Maréchal de France et Grand Chevalier de la Légion d'honneur ainsi qu'à tous les Polonais de 1795 jusqu'à la fin du vol de l'aigle en 1815 qui combattirent pour leur pays et les idéaux de liberté avec la France. 🇫🇷❤🇵🇱 Chwała Polsce i oddziałom Józefa Poniatowskiego Marszałkowi Francji i Wielkiemu Kawalerowi Legii Honorowej oraz wszystkim Polakom od roku 1795 aż do końca lotu orła w roku 1815, którzy walczyli za ojczyznę i ideały wolności z Francją. 🇫🇷❤🇵🇱
@@fuxihutterer8088 Tiny state? Prussia? You mean the same Prussia with the same troops commanded by Frederick II, who was arguably the best general Germany ever had and who dominated Europe using those same troops? That Prussia?
I’m pretty sure the painter literally stood over napoleon’s memorial for like 2 hours when he invaded France and apparently said to his peers ‘That was the best moment in my life’. This was not long before he started his invasion, so he was basically standing over one great leader to say, I can accomplish more than you, and yet due to the stupidity of the higher ups with delivering winter coats they failed in the exact same spot napoleon did
Snow didn't defeat them, German generals used that as an excuse because they wouldn't admit that the Red Army was considerably stronger then them, because that would have killed the morale of the german troops
Napoleon's Crimes: A Blueprint for Hitler (French: Le Crime de Napoléon) is a book published in 2005 by French writer Claude Ribbe, who is of Caribbean origin. In the book, Ribbe advances the thesis that Napoleon Bonaparte during the Haitian Revolution first used gas chambers as a method of mass execution, 140 years before Hitler and the Nazis. His accusations in the book has caused a minor political and academic storm when it was published, and its premise remains under contention to this day. In the early 19th century, Napoleon had reinstated slavery in the French colonies of Saint-Domingue (now Haiti) and Guadeloupe, these were subsequently hit by a series of massive slave rebellions. Napoleon, as the person responsible for the reinstatement of slavery after the First French Republic had abolished it, was in charge of putting the slave revolts down, and he did so with brutal efficiency. Ribbe claims that some of Napoleon's men refused to do as they were ordered, and then later wrote journals describing the massacre. From these passages, he claims that Napoleon's troops burnt sulphur (readily collected from nearby volcanoes) to make sulphur dioxide gas, which is extremely poisonous. This would have been effective at helping to quell the rebelling Caribbean slaves. Ribbe's most controversial accusation is that the holds of ships were used as makeshift gas chambers; and that up to 100,000 black slaves were murdered in them. These revelations are still in considerable academic dispute, but when the book was published, the French establishment was quick to condemn his allegations. The French newspaper France Soir, a populist tabloid, for instance, published a stinging editorial, calling the claims of the book insane. The French historian Pierre Branda wrote a critical analysis of Ribbe's book, stating that it is mainly based on suppositions and that the sources are few and often quoted and referred to with heavy omissions. The book was written in a context of social tension for the bicentenary of Austerlitz and in the same timeframe as the Affaire Olivier Grenouilleau, where the author is strongly implicated. Jérôme Gautheret, in Le Monde, considers that « Le Crime de Napoléon n’est pas un livre d’histoire » "is not a history book" and describes it as « charge polémique dirigée contre les « historiographes officiels » "a polemical charge directed against the "official historiographers"" and a "pamphlet" that does not really contribute to a “critical re-reading of the colonial fact”.[1] Nicolas Lebourg denounces “this type of anachronism, [...] describing the slave trade as a Holocaust in wedge Napoleon's Crimes: A Blueprint for Hitler (French: Le Crime de Napoléon) is a book published in 2005 by French writer Claude Ribbe, who is of Caribbean origin. In the book, Ribbe advances the thesis that Napoleon Bonaparte during the Haitian Revolution first used gas chambers as a method of mass execution, 140 years before Hitler and the Nazis. His accusations in the book has caused a minor political and academic storm when it was published, and its premise remains under contention to this day. In the early 19th century, Napoleon had reinstated slavery in the French colonies of Saint-Domingue (now Haiti) and Guadeloupe, these were subsequently hit by a series of massive slave rebellions. Napoleon, as the person responsible for the reinstatement of slavery after the First French Republic had abolished it, was in charge of putting the slave revolts down, and he did so with brutal efficiency. Ribbe claims that some of Napoleon's men refused to do as they were ordered, and then later wrote journals describing the massacre. From these passages, he claims that Napoleon's troops burnt sulphur (readily collected from nearby volcanoes) to make sulphur dioxide gas, which is extremely poisonous. This would have been effective at helping to quell the rebelling Caribbean slaves. Ribbe's most controversial accusation is that the holds of ships were used as makeshift gas chambers; and that up to 100,000 black slaves were murdered in them. These revelations are still in considerable academic dispute, but when the book was published, the French establishment was quick to condemn his allegations. The French newspaper France Soir, a populist tabloid, for instance, published a stinging editorial, calling the claims of the book insane. The French historian Pierre Branda wrote a critical analysis of Ribbe's book, stating that it is mainly based on suppositions and that the sources are few and often quoted and referred to with heavy omissions. The book was written in a context of social tension for the bicentenary of Austerlitz and in the same timeframe as the Affaire Olivier Grenouilleau, where the author is strongly implicated. Jérôme Gautheret, in Le Monde, considers that « Le Crime de Napoléon n’est pas un livre d’histoire » "is not a history book" and describes it as « charge polémique dirigée contre les « historiographes officiels » "a polemical charge directed against the "official historiographers"" and a "pamphlet" that does not really contribute to a “critical re-reading of the colonial fact”.[1] Nicolas Lebourg denounces “this type of anachronism, [...] describing the slave trade as a Holocaust in wedges So yes napoleon did commit atrocities
@@Puro116 Napoleon beat Russia in every battle on Russian soil but the Russians kept escaping capture. The winter was the final nail on the coffin for Napoleons army
Só ganharam usando estratégias da Terra arrasada a favor do seu povo, nunca a Rússia teve um exército para se igualar ao inimigo, um exemplo disso é hoje em dia, vocês estão perdendo pra um país fraco e pequeno igual a Ucrânia. 🇩🇪🇧🇷💪🏽
@@ТимурГудков-м4лпо сути вся пойна Наполеона и Гитлера была с Россией(СССР) - войны в Африке или во Франции были очень незначительны хотя Америка и Британия описывают эти события как грандиозные - Наполеон самую массовую армию привёл в Россиию и проиграл - опять запад выдумал историю о победе "зиме" - хотя Кутузов тактически переиграл Наполеона - но наврятли покажут и расскажу про это
"no genocides" Oh yeah how about when he was invading Egypt then switched to Gaza and Alareesh when he tried invading Yafa he told their people no blood will be shed, when they let him in he killed every single one of them, totally no genocides.
Maybe because the people of Egypt kept killing his men when he tried to approach them with peace. He wanted to get off of the Mamelukes who kept oppressing the people of that region. Not to mention when Napoleon sent men to send messages they kept getting beheaded and put their heads of those Frenchmen on top of the walls. Stop trying to imply he committed evil acts like killing for no reason at all. Not only that, after he left Egypt and left a talented general in charge who wanted to surrender with the british, general Kleber, he got stabbed by a local student.
@@thefrenchempire14 bro repeit until you believe it, but i dont care about it , i just found annoying that when its jews its bad but when its everybody else it doesnt matter
Austrian painter did not invent genocide. Napoleon massacred a huge number of people, for example in Spain. He reestablished slavery and killed a certain number of black people in Haiti. Actually he was the Austrian painter of the 19th century.
Obviously he didnt invent genocide there were genocides far bigger then the 3-6 million hitler killed. Stalin in one year before hitler took power killed 5-6 million Ukrainians for example and there were genocides more than 10 times that number before and after hitler
@@kid_toucherwinners always present defeated ones as evil and brutal, to justify their existence and actions. So, yes, in fact none of those two were evil
Mao Zedong has entered the chat Stalin has entered the chat Hideki Tojo entered the chat Leopold II of Belgium has entered the chat The British Empire has entered the chat with its boys the Roman Empire and out of nowhere, the whole Spanish Inquisition.
The funniest thing about Napoleon is that he wasn't evil and didn't provocated battles It was only Europe trying to defeat him to bring back monarchy in France cause nobody in Europe wanted to get revolutions and empires back Napoleon only defended France and won all his battles except one who made him lose the control And he mostly won in wars France was alone against 3-4 countries united
@@fuxihutterer8088lmao, Napoleon faced the Austrian Empire, the Holy Roman Empire / Prussia, the Swedish Empire, the Danish Empire, the Papal States, the Russian Empire, the British Empire, the Ottoman Empire, Portugal, Spain + German States such as Saxony, Wurtemberg, Bavaria, ... + Italian States such as Venice, Naples, Sardinia, ... When hitler only faced USSR, USA and UK at the same time. By the way, hitler was the one who declared war on its neighbors and Napoleon was the one attacked by its neighbors.
Napoleon Bonaparte (born Napoleone di Buonaparte;[1][b] 15 August 1769 - 5 May 1821), later known by his regnal name Napoleon I, was a French military and political leader who rose to prominence during the French Revolution and led a series of successful campaigns across Europe during the Revolutionary Wars and Napoleonic Wars from 1796 to 1815. He was the leader of the French Republic as First Consul from 1799 to 1804, then of the French Empire as Emperor of the French from 1804 to 1814, and briefly again in 1815. Born on the island of Corsica to a family of Italian origin, Napoleon moved to mainland France in 1779 and was commissioned as an officer in the French Army in 1785. He supported the French Revolution in 1789, and promoted its cause in Corsica. He rose rapidly in the ranks after breaking the siege of Toulon in 1793 and firing on royalist insurgents in Paris on 13 Vendémiaire in 1795. In 1796, Napoleon commanded a military campaign against the Austrians and their Italian allies in the War of the First Coalition, scoring decisive victories and becoming a national hero. He led an expedition to Egypt and Syria in 1798 which served as a springboard to political power. In November 1799, Napoleon engineered the Coup of 18 Brumaire against the Directory, and became First Consul of the Republic. He won the Battle of Marengo in 1800, which secured French victory in the War of the Second Coalition, and in 1803 sold the territory of Louisiana to the United States, which doubled the latter's area. In December 1804, Napoelon crowned himself Emperor of the French, further expanding his power. The breakdown of the Treaty of Amiens led to the War of the Third Coalition by 1805. Napoleon shattered the coalition with a decisive victory at the Battle of Austerlitz, which led to the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire. In the War of the Fourth Coalition, Napoleon defeated Prussia at the Battle of Jena-Auerstedt in 1806, marched his Grande Armée into Eastern Europe, and defeated the Russians in 1807 at the Battle of Friedland. Seeking to extend his trade embargo against Britain, Napoleon invaded the Iberian Peninsula and installed his brother Joseph as King of Spain in 1808, provoking the Peninsular War, mainly fought by his marshals until 1814. In 1809, the Austrians again challenged France in the War of the Fifth Coalition, in which Napoleon solidified his grip over Europe after winning the Battle of Wagram. In summer 1812, Napoleon launched an invasion of Russia, which ended in the catastrophic retreat of his army that winter. In 1813, Prussia and Austria joined Russia in the War of the Sixth Coalition, in which Napoleon was decisively defeated at the Battle of Leipzig. The coalition invaded France and captured Paris, forcing Napoleon to abdicate in April 1814. They exiled him to the Mediterranean island of Elba and restored the Bourbons to power. In February 1815, Napoleon escaped from Elba and again took control of France in what became known as the "Hundred Days". His opponents responded by forming a Seventh Coalition, which defeated him at the Battle of Waterloo in June 1815. Napoleon was exiled to the remote island of Saint Helena in the South Atlantic, where he died of stomach cancer in 1821, aged 51. Napoleon is considered one of the greatest military commanders in history and Napoleonic tactics are still studied at military schools worldwide. His legacy endures through the modernizing legal and administrative reforms he enacted in France and Western Europe, embodied in the Napoleonic Code. He established a system of public education,[2] abolished the vestiges of feudalism,[3] emancipated Jews and other religious minorities,[4] abolished the Spanish Inquisition,[5] enacted the principle of equality before the law for an emerging middle class,[6] and centralized state power at the expense of religious authorities.[7] His conquests acted as a catalyst for political change and the development of nation states. However, he is controversial due to his role in wars which devastated Europe, his looting of conquered territories, and his mixed record on civil rights: he abolished the free press, ended directly elected representative government, exiled and jailed critics of his regime, reinstated slavery in France's colonies except for Haiti, banned the entry of blacks and mulattos into France, reduced the civil rights of women and children in France, reintroduced a hereditary monarchy and nobility,[8][9][10] and violently repressed popular uprisings against his rule.[11] Early life Napoleon's family was of Italian origin. His paternal ancestors, the Buonapartes, descended from a minor Tuscan noble family who emigrated to Corsica in the 16th century and his maternal ancestors, the Ramolinos, descended from a noble family from Lombardy.[12] Half-length portrait of a wigged middle-aged man with a well-to-do jacket. His left hand is tucked inside his waistcoat. Napoleon's father, Carlo Buonaparte, fought for Corsican independence under Pasquale Paoli. After their defeat, he eventually became the island's representative to Louis XVI's court. Napoleon's parents, Carlo Maria Buonaparte and Maria Letizia Ramolino, lived in the Maison Bonaparte home in Ajaccio, where Napoleon was born on 15 August 1769. He had an elder brother, Joseph, and, later, six younger siblings: Lucien, Elisa, Louis, Pauline, Caroline, and Jérôme.[13] Five more siblings were stillborn or did not survive infancy.[14] Napoleon was baptized as a Catholic, under the name Napoleone di Buonaparte. In his youth, his name was also spelled as Nabulione, Nabulio, Napolionne, and Napulione.[15] Napoleon was born one year after the Republic of Genoa ceded Corsica to France.[16][c] His father fought alongside Pasquale Paoli during the Corsican war of independence against France. After the Corsican defeat at the Battle of Ponte Novu in 1769 and Paoli's exile in Britain, Carlo became friends with the French governor Charles Louis de Marbeuf, who became his patron and godfather to Napoleon.[20][21] With Mabeuf's support, Carlo was named Corsican representative to the court of Louis XVI and Napoleon obtained a royal bursary to a military academy in France.[22][23] The dominant influence of Napoleon's childhood was his mother, whose firm discipline restrained a rambunctious child.[22] Later in life, Napoleon said, "The future destiny of the child is always the work of the mother."[24] Napoleon's noble, moderately affluent background afforded him greater opportunities to study than were available to a typical Corsican of the time.[25] In January 1779, at age 9, Napoleon moved to the French mainland and enrolled at a religious school in Autun to improve his French (his mother tongue was the Corsican dialect of Italian).[26][27][28] Although he eventually became fluent in French, he spoke with a Corsican accent and his French spelling was poor.[29] In May, he transferred to the military academy at Brienne-le-Château where he was routinely bullied by his peers for his accent, birthplace, short stature, mannerisms, and poor French.[26] He became reserved and melancholic, applying himself to reading. An examiner observed that Napoleon "has always been distinguished for his application in mathematics. He is fairly well acquainted with history and geography ... This boy would make an excellent sailor".[d][31] One story of Napoleon at the school is that he led junior students to victory against senior students in a snowball fight, which allegedly showed his leadership abilities.[32] But the story was only told after Napoleon had become famous.[33] In his later years at Brienne, Napoleon became an outspoken Corsican nationalist and admirer of Paoli.[34] this isn’t the full story btw
If we compare armies *relative* to the armies of the time, Napoleon easily claps. Capturing Berlin in 33 days and 80% of the Prussian army as prisoners whilst marching by foot is more impressive than capturing Paris in 6 weeks by modern roads and engines. Fight me.
@user-f49kyyo8u My comment was kind of a troll comment, but I'd like to just inform you that the French weren't surrendering cowards during WW2. I don't know a *single* actual historian who will support that claim. The French army had many issues (lack of radio, lack of freedom for generals to take initiative), but the reason it collapsed so rapidly was that the German generals were able to poke the French line at an area they thought was easily defensible, and only put poorly-trained divisions there. Then, as the Germans broke that line with their tanks, they didn't slow down to wait for their infantry divisions as high command ordered, stopping the French from reinforcing the line with their veteran divisions. In the end, it was the last stand by those said veteran divisions that gave the British Expeditionary Force *any* chance of survival at Dunkirk. It's very funny that the soldiers who would heroically fight to the death for liberty against the Nazi regime are considered cowards. The rest of the French army in the south afterwards had lost too much equipment and wasn't able to form up a defensive line against the German panzers, and as so was defeated rapidly afterwards.
@@PrVecXD_ That's fair tho, ngl. And to be fair, the Germans had a very modern mindset on warfare on the outset of WW2, although I still think in relative comparison the French armies were more superior to those of their time than the German armies were to those of their said time.
The German army captured more than 2 million English and French (the strongest armies on the planet) with extreme ease and with 800-1,000,000 soldiers in less than 1 week
My view: If you want some quick win with low casualties > Napoleon If you really aggresive for wanting to annex big size country > Austrian Painter (with calculation caution)
napoleo wasent that evil he still was a bit but compared to hitler he wasent at all. he did no genocides and created a code that is still used to these days
most popular general in history known for his exceptional genius in miliary tactics vs some dude known for his atrocities towards the jews. i think the winner is clear.
Yes
Alexander the great
@@PrVecXD_innovations, tactics, strategies, battles won, battles fought, better leader, feats, casualties - all say napoleon is better than Austrian painter
@@arandomhistorian fax
@@PrVecXD_ Idk why tf thes guys are mentioning tanks and airforce, this is not a real war, just a comparison, tanks and Airforce will come under one word (factor) "Technology", and I am pretty sure that the French would dominate in other factors
Historical fun fact: The Austrian mustachioed man was inspired by Napoleon. Napoleon was inspired by Caesar. Caesar was inspired by Alexander the Great. Alexander the Great was inspired by Achilles. And Achilles wasn't a real person.
Source?
@BruhLL Common knowledge
@@misterbig.b6662 Nah I want the source. There's no "common knowledge " in this.
@@BruhLLThe real answer is we don't know.
@@kostasbiker9302 So in short it was made up huh?
Rules of bullying
🇺🇸 : Don’t bully the quiet kid
🇦🇹 : Don’t diss the art student
🇫🇷 : Don’t diss the short Corsican for his accent
And dont diss the short Corsican from his hand writing
But There's nothing that short guy can do
@@Cansodimaybe he had disgraphy (i have too)
he was average height for the time
5.6 isn't that short
Hitler : ❌
Austrian painter: ✅
💀💀💀
Bro was "family friendly" to get money from this somehow
@@82adamelliI don’t even get money
Im talking to the creator of the short not u
@@82adamelli I’m the creator of the short and I don’t get money
@@82adamelli bruhhhh he is creator 💀💀
Literally Napoleon is so goated that it took several countries to beat him and they got defeated numerous times before managing a win, the funny part is that they where so scared of him being alive that they sealed his corpse within several coffins.
and also multiple nations fought him as a person
Жаль что его остановили. Тогда сейчас скорее всего мир был бы намного стабильнее и, вероятно, не было бы угрозы Европе в лице РФ и их варваров.
The same can be said about Hitler also. It took 3 superpowers to defeat him.
Did napoleon have to fight against the USSR, United States, and the the UK along with all their colonies?
@@kingdragonthefirst4686 No he had fought against Austria, Prussia, Russia, and Great Britain which for 1800's are the superpowers at that time, he fended them off simultaneously and even with a weakened french army they still lost badly, one of their tactics at that time when they see Napoleon was to run and not engage him head on...
"Never interrupt an enemy while he's making a mistake."
-Napoléon Bonaparte
Actually Sun Tzu wrote that 🥸
Sun Tzu, The Art of War
@@WereismymilkIt is also one of Napoleon’s quotes. You can research it as well.
@@Capin-Crunch It's more his practice.
Since there was a case when he praised the useless Austrian general, who lost to him, and thanks to this, the Austrians decided that since this general surprised Napoleon himself, then he should probably be re-appointed commander-in-chief.
Which is how Napoleon lost ironically.
"Do not compare yourself to others. If you do so you are insulting yourself."
-Austrian Painter
I have an old book that states the quote below was said by the same painter:
“ _A dictator is like a bicycle driver. If he/she stops, then he/she will fall_ “
@sagagis this makes sense
Ayo I need this quote, thanks my man
@@sagagisand that’s what happened to him
*B A S E D*
Napoleon: Attacks Switzerland
Austrian painter: doesn’t attack Switzerland
Switzerland wasn't neutral back then
Switerland was mostly dependent of HOLY empire back then i think
@@Ploufaa07 hre was a puppet of Austrian empire
@@arandomhistoriannah switzerland was scared to be attacked but paid germany to not attack them in ww2
@@Saturnfavplanet bruh, I am saying Holy Roman empire (Hre) was I puppet of Austria and you are speaking about something else
He's just a painter. What do you expect from him? A world war?
Or 60 million death?
@@kingmavis9970uk started ww2
How so?germany was the one who started the war with the invasion of poland but then the uk and france declared war on germany so technically germany started the war by invading poland which made them declare war.@@yasinneysari
@@sharlockborls6308 poland and some land was part of Germany before ww1. Germany just wants their own land that had been lost in the treaty of Versailles. Germany needed that land for space of living because the population of Germany was so high and resources are so low. Germany didn't want to conquer the world. This is a big lie. So balance of power just was an excuse. And the UK and france shouldn't be declared a war. In addition,even your biggest enemy wants peace you should accept. Germany gave so many big proposals to stop war. He didn't attack Dunkirk just for peace. But uk shout out "i want war" . Germany started a war to survive. Even if it started the war, it didn't start ww2.
@@kingmavis9970 God painter 🙋🏻♂️
And both failed in Russia, lol
True but they both reached moscow too
@@PrVecXD_
Hitler did not reached Moscow. His armies was stopped near it.
@@Goran1138 they still reached it but both didn’t attack only Napoleon did
Rusobot kid😂
Napoleon had already defeated Russia several times they are not the same
53 battles won is wild
Were more actually these are only the big ones
But if we are being honest, a lot of engagements for the mustache man weren’t taken into account with the ‘less than 10’ scoring. Look at events like Bialystok, Minsk, Narva, Hungary, Warsaw, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Paris, Kiev, Sevastopol, etc. I doubt it scaled up to 53, but probably damn near close
khalid ibn lwalid won 200 and lost 0
@@Medsel5 Lost 0? wouldnt be so sure about that...
@@Medsel5nice tales
Napoleon: Led His Men From The Front In The Battle.
Painter: Shouted Random Orders From His Bunker.
Hitler fought through all of WW1
From the back he still led men, but on some occasions he would go to the front to rally his men and inspire.
Ok pajit
And those orders had the world fearing one only country for 6 years 😂
@perseus274I wouldn't call him a nazi, but i agree with your initial statement. I hate people who are obviously uneducated in a certain subject and just say common shit you'd find on Facebook. Like bro, if you're gonna comment on a subject, you best have common knowledge before you say random shit.
Austrian painter : *learned Napoleon's style and way to win a war*
Also him : *Proceed to invade Russia*
“There is nothing we can do” most important quote said by a man
He never said that lol
Yeah, but he dead so stop embarrassing yourself
@thetanmanmcg6378He didnt say that goofshit search it up
@thetanmanmcg6378 It's just a theory/meme. Also you think Napoleon fan (who's romantically attracted to Napoleon) would think he actually said that?? Lmao I think you're the one who should be educating themselves
Thats an meaningless meme quote, it doesn't have any meaning, its just a random phrase that can be utter by anyone. The better one is "Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily"
Napoleon gets exiled: there’s nothing we can do
Austrian fail art class:
😂😂😂😂
to be fqir when hes was exiled for the first time he came back
and the second place he was exiled to was a rock floating in the atlantics ocean
thousands of kilometers away from a landmass
my man also had 2 ships and 2000 men constantly guard him
@@r4ndomlyredwhen they fear so much they lock you in Alcatraz
He got revenge
@@painvillegaming4119 might i also point out that like 4 empires declared war not on france
but fucking napoleon himself. like napoleon was that much of a menace
Napoleon owns this song at this point
true
Frr
Did yo know, napoleon was a sex obsessed romantic...
France the army. Josephine. - Napoleon Bonaparte
Thats literally a myth told by the trashy new Napoleon movie
“Sir, Germany invaded Poland!”
“There's...something..we can do.”
@HansLanzathis is totally false and the British were doing everything possible to make Polish government give Gdańsk
@HansLanza follow your leader 👨 🔫
@HansLanza tf you talking about? they obvs didnt want a war and even more they didnt want a russian german joint invasion since the soviets were their allies
@HansLanza soviets were alied with the allies
“Sir germany has taken Over what shall we do?”
“There is nothing we can do”
* “sir soviets are in berlin. What shall we do ?”
“There is nothing we can do”
Yeah Right Germany and other 5 countries?
@@JayFrr124germany carried the axis powers 💀💀
@@JayFrr124 yh 🥲
Actually austrian painter himself admired napoleon. when he invaded france he took 1 day leave to see the french city of paris and napoleon works.
“Anyone can handle victory, only the mighty can bear defeat”-Austrian Painter
Bro Hitler literally couldn't bear defeat
@@hailcaesar372 yeah, he showed that he wasn’t mighty
He killed himself hiding like a rat in his bunker
I mean he lost everything what else he was supposed to do @@ZaoMedong-
@@ZaoMedong-But took 14 million people with him. I'd say he was a legend.
Nepoleon - i could not conquer Russia
Hitler - ha ha same
Mongols - i dont get the joke
💀
Napoleon didn't want to conquer Russia
Exactly 💯
mongols didnt beat japan 😂
The Russian empire and the mongol empire did not co exist. Mongols conquered the small tribes that consisted of the Russian empire in later years not the Russian empire itself.
Rommel: “sir we've lost this battle, what can we do?”
Adolf: *“There's nothing we can do.”*
There's some we can do
@@Phil-r7dWelcome to Argentina😊
"sir steiner didnt have enough power for a counter-offensive, what can we do?"
@@formidablememories wir können nichts tun
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
Both were Charismatic leaders and more influential than any leader this world has seen in 70 years.
Influncive? Are we just making words up now?
@@NN-oz6rrrizz
Technically,70 years ago (1953), Stalin was still alive , though he died that year
Mao might be up there just because he created modern day china
@@raUser9982Stalin wasn't a great leader, in war he only won because of the help from his allies through men and food supplies, he won only because of army numbers instead of good strategies, he held back the Soviet union' economy and population by using communism instead of capitalism and his ideology (communism) has failed and is now on life support in the countries that matter (not to mention that unlike H1tl3r the USSR won the war and he had nothing holding him back from spreading communism)
Napoleon: "There is nothing we can do"🤧
Painter: "Victory or Death for me"🗿
Victory or Argentina
It takes more strength to admit defeat :)
@@szymonb9996🤡
@@hpgames8845 nah bro
Napolean didn't really say "there's nothing we can do"
They have something in common
They failed invading Russia
True
USSR*
Napoleon- Russian Empire 1812
Austrian Painter - Ussr 1941-1945
@@DavidS.8347Yes, but both were defeated, and in the case of Napoleon, the loss of an entire army due to lack of supplies and unfavorable weather.
@@cubinometrikussr? The russian ssr is literally the same thing
Honestly, in all fields of leadership and strategies, napolean wins.
Это так
✨But they both made one biggest mistake - invade Russia✨
And didn't solve problem with Britain in advance
@@АртурБриджесAnd they fought on two fronts
but Hitler wanted to destroy Russia, and Napoleon simply wanted us not to trade with Britain... Napoleon was many times taller than Hitler, maybe not in height, but in soul and mind.
@@ilochkaa yes.
Old Russia aint doing shit against napoleon lmfao watch your history book
Napoleon was so skilled instead of going for France they were straight up declaring war on Napoleon himself.
If napolean had access to modern day military technology he would truly be unstoppable. The man was ahead of his time.
Edit: Mom I'm famous!
@MowerTes some say
He was an artillery officer. There’s no proof he would have adapted well to combined arms warfare
Ephesians 6:10-18 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; and your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints. The bible is no old book. You have to really let Christ open your eyes; to see the world in shambles. Many people say it's a religion to lock up people in chains, and say it's a rule book.. why? Because people hate hearing the truth, it hurts their flesh, it's hurts their pride, it's exposes on what things have they done..people love this world so much, s*x, money, power, women, supercars.. things of this world. Still trying to find something that can fill that emptiness in your heart. You can't find that in this world.. only in Christ, the bible is no chains, it's a chainbreaker. Breaking your sins into pieces... Repent now, and turn back to the true Lord only.. God bless.😊😊😊😊
silly
Modern tactics are extremely different to the ones of his time, he’d have a hard time adapting
People in 1923 : we will have flying cars in 2023
2023: napoleon vs hitler edit 💀💀
Edit:okay wow I did not know I had this much likes
there are car that can fly bro..
Bro lives under a stone ever heard of helicopters
No in 2023 we have internet and fon
Bro does not know what is he talking about
People in 1923 Germany: Napoleon vs WHAT?
“Failed art school” 💀
The third reich was by far the largest empire in europe this is one mistake in the video
Yes since during ww2 Germany also had a lot of territory in Africa too.
Well France had indo China, French Polynesia, parts of Canada and usa and actually owned most of Africa ☠
@@marchfabmeirchiawn_OGISM learn geography, genius.
@@rounfallcount I should ad in europe cause those colonies meant nothing lil bro
"No genocides"
Haitian slaves: 💀💀💀
Spanish people💀
Haitian slaves did a genocide on every people on the island first including themselves too
It was popular back then 👴🏻
@@jaguarbrave8453 Le fait qu'ils aient tous pratiqué l'esclavage annule donc le fait qu'Haïti soit un génocide ? Le fait que tout le monde ait pratiqué l'esclavage annule tout ce que les Espagnols ont fait dans les Amériques lorsqu'ils y sont arrivés ?
@@jaguarbrave8453 Bien que les Français aient aboli l'esclavage, Napoléon était favorable à l'esclavage et a même envoyé des troupes pour mettre fin à la révolution en Haïti,
"History repeats itself" really comes into effect when you realize both lost in Russia and they're both incredibly scary to fight against
Mood
U.S. military:😳
@perseus274 used to be buddy
@perseus274that's why US had to use nukes to fight against a non-nuclear powered country 😂
@@HOMIOI1you mean bunch of transgender and gays??
Napoleon:gets banished to an island
“Theres nothing we can do”
Austrian painter:fails art call
Starts WWII fought in WWI and moved to argentina
He committed he did not move to Argentina only other Nazi generals moved there like Mengele and Eichmann
Music?
@@Azul547amor plastique
@irene._.054amour*
Keep in mind, Napoleon came back after being banished from Elba
Napoleon is one the best emperor/general of all time. He's a g.o.a.t.
Austrian Goat is The G.O.A.E
Napoleon biggest goat of all generals And emperors
Lmao Fatih The Conqueror is better than napoleon bro
@@gEditzz28473 bro where did you get it
Caesar: may i introduce myself
Bro was too terrified to write skinny mustache man
If these two go in a battle in the same era with the same size of army and technology then Napoleon wins 100%
Yes
@@Jan.jan2024please remember that the best german general is blucher, and he himself got defeated 4 times in a single campagin against napoleon alone, napoleon also has several of the greatest french generals like jean-baptise jourdan, andre massena, davout and much more, rommel or manstein or any german general wouldnt win if they face them in a 1v1 or even a 1v2.
@@NewIURGTHIMMLER?
@@Jan.jan2024Rather depends on the size of the army. If there were only a couple of battalions or divisions, Napaleon would have won. Because I think within a couple of weeks or even days, Napaleon would have fully studied the technologies of the 20th century. It turns out that the larger armies collide, the higher the chance of victory for the Austrian and the lower Napaleon, and vice versa, the smaller the troops, the higher the chance of victory for Napaleon
@@Jan.jan2024Germans had finest generals in 1800s 😂😂, then why didn't they save Berlin from napoleonic invasion in 1806
The fact that his peak army size is so much higher than napoleon yet still he won less battles then napoleon, just shows how much strategy napoleon had
Measure the size of their enemies armies.
Tenía menos soldados ya que son otras épocas, en los tiempos de napoleón esa cantidad era enorme y en los tiempos del pintor esos números eran los normales
"Normal" obviously Revolutionary France adopted massive draft as one of the first nations, but its not Napoleons ingenuity that lead to that draft to be adopted. And other countries did so too. Especially Prussia. Moreover in the time of the "painter" he still had one of the biggest draft rates up to the manpower pool being depleted. @@DROLEAN755
@@geranicoversMVCOALITION ?😂
Vive l'empereur 🇨🇵❤🇨🇵
Hitler didn't win any battles i dont know where they got that 10 battles figure
Ахринеть, слушай это самое топовое сравнение, за последние годы....
They both had something in common....
Got their a$$e$ kicked by the russkies)
Napoléon was in Moscow, he left russia by himself because the russian burn Moscow so no food, water and Somewhere to rest, and when Napoléon was in russia there is a volcano that blow up in oceania and the rumor Say that Napoléon Lost because of the volcano.
@@PyrrhusHLhe didn't left moskow by himself... if he stayed there for 2 more days, then they'd be surrounded by russians... and napoleon didn't have enough forces to fight against russians any further... so he was forced to leave... but his entire army got destroyed during the invasion and he got defeated at the end
@@PyrrhusHLno napoleon lost because there was a storm in the pacific ocean 😂
everything
Napoleon wasnt evil. He liberated my country 🇵🇱 he wanted poland strong. Wiwat rzeczpospolita francuska, wiwat rzeczpospolita obojga narodów
I didn’t say he was evil Wdym????
@user-f49kyyo8u he wasn't really that evil, coalition forces were the real evils who wanted to suppress the French Revolution because they don't want their people to be inspired by French Revolution and rise against them
He Put Europe in Ruins Napoleon ist evil warmonger
@user-f49kyyo8uhe literally lost
@@arandomhistorianexactly
Team Napoléon
👇
Your pfp💀
Team 1940😂
@@Fishyrust nah team 1944
Hello
@@caesargaming42💀
France has really rich history after the barbarian-celtic-Frankish invasion,sending hug from Iran(Persia) 🇮🇷🤝🇫🇷
Napoleon was one of the greatest military generals of all time, having speed, element of surprise, and great tactics. Sad that he had to spend the rest of his life in St. Helena
There is nothing we can do
-Napeleon
Blitzkrieg exist mate
The Austrian painter defeated
France Belgium Netherlands poland norway in 6 months
Thank god he invaded ussr otherwise we would all be speaking german
@@nacht3675There was always going to be conflict between Hitler and Stalin. Their ideologies are in conflict and would inevitably lead into fighting.
@@kiyopon_holgae_spammer7398Blitzkrieg evolved from Napoleonic manoeuvring strategies, especially the corps system.
Video title : Hitler vs napoleon
Hitler fans : There’s nothing we can do😢
Who is a fan of Hitler?
@@iwantmynametobeaslongaspos7194 antisocial losers
Napoleon is known as one of the greatest millitary generals rarely losing every battle he faces
Many of his 26 marshals are also famous generals who won several battles for example Michel Ney
Not only his Marshals, but his generals many who were better than some marshals were very gifted men. Vandamme, Saint-Hilaire, Kellermann who actually was the one who saved the battle of Marengo. Dupont, Gudin, Lasalle, Kleber, Moreau,any more who at one point served under him could've been greater than Ney and many others.
@@NeverGoingToGiveYouUp000
Davout reste quand même le meilleur Maréchal de Napoléon
'Sir you are better than hitler'
Napoleon 'there is nothing he can do'
Napoleon only lost because he didn't have a square mustache
And the over 150k French troops lost in Spain
@@alejandroalonso5386And because he is the stupid man, for attacking Russia and got wrecked by only one country. And everybody calls him smart😂
The answer was obvious 🇫🇷
WE'RE GOING TO MOSCOW WITH THIS ONE🗣️🔥🔥🔥
Both failed
@@TUD22141that was the joke…
@@timo1209?
@@TUD22141Napoleon did reach Moscow
Austrian painter was closer to taking over the world if he didn't invade ussr
We in Poland love Napoleon he wanted to get Poland Independent. Napoleon had a lot of polish officers in his army.
Poland 🇵🇱 love Napoleon 🇫🇷!!!
And Polish soldiers were courageous and faithful to Napoléon.
By the way, I really like the national anthem of Poland (and the mention to Bonaparte).
And French people like Poland 🇨🇵 ❤️ 🇵🇱 (a jamais nos frères ❤️)
Gloire à la Pologne et aux troupes de Józef Poniatowski Maréchal de France et Grand Chevalier de la Légion d'honneur ainsi qu'à tous les Polonais de 1795 jusqu'à la fin du vol de l'aigle en 1815 qui combattirent pour leur pays et les idéaux de liberté avec la France.
🇫🇷❤🇵🇱
Chwała Polsce i oddziałom Józefa Poniatowskiego Marszałkowi Francji i Wielkiemu Kawalerowi Legii Honorowej oraz wszystkim Polakom od roku 1795 aż do końca lotu orła w roku 1815, którzy walczyli za ojczyznę i ideały wolności z Francją.
🇫🇷❤🇵🇱
BOOOO!
A Very Foolish man!
Traitor!
😡👎🔥🌶️🍅🥚🥬❌🚫⛔
On aime la Pologne 😉 nos amis
Hitler take Paris in 6 week Napoleon take Berlin in 6 days
Napoleon take Moscow, Painter can't take.
@@Mr.Niceguy616 Painter too
@@Mr.Niceguy616 I don't like Painter. I'm not fascist.
me too
@@Mr.Niceguy616fun fact : Napoléon actually won against russia in the third coalition.
There's nothing we can do..
-Napoleon
Allemagne🇩🇪 : on a pris ton pays en 46 jours
France 🇫🇷 : on la prit en 6 jours
A tiny state prussia Back then Germany wasnt even there so Take L french Guy 🏳️🏳️🥺😭🔛🔝🇩🇪☀️⚡
You Had Help from britain and all your collonies and still lost aahahh😂😂
@@fuxihutterer8088 and prussia had the help of almost all of europe
@@fuxihutterer8088 Tiny state? Prussia? You mean the same Prussia with the same troops commanded by Frederick II, who was arguably the best general Germany ever had and who dominated Europe using those same troops? That Prussia?
@@fuxihutterer80886 days cry kid 😹
There's nothing we can do
"Dome misty two river jam a pear don't diss you gym annoy dont have air ditto wood yeah I'm good"
I’m pretty sure the painter literally stood over napoleon’s memorial for like 2 hours when he invaded France and apparently said to his peers ‘That was the best moment in my life’. This was not long before he started his invasion, so he was basically standing over one great leader to say, I can accomplish more than you, and yet due to the stupidity of the higher ups with delivering winter coats they failed in the exact same spot napoleon did
And because he was dumb asf and only his generals were enough intelligent to make good tactics (like Rommels)
Paintee even Said that they should send Winter coats but the Generals Said no
They stayed in USSR several winters, they were defeated by Red Army not by snow
Snow didn't defeat them, German generals used that as an excuse because they wouldn't admit that the Red Army was considerably stronger then them, because that would have killed the morale of the german troops
Napoleon's Crimes: A Blueprint for Hitler (French: Le Crime de Napoléon) is a book published in 2005 by French writer Claude Ribbe, who is of Caribbean origin. In the book, Ribbe advances the thesis that Napoleon Bonaparte during the Haitian Revolution first used gas chambers as a method of mass execution, 140 years before Hitler and the Nazis. His accusations in the book has caused a minor political and academic storm when it was published, and its premise remains under contention to this day.
In the early 19th century, Napoleon had reinstated slavery in the French colonies of Saint-Domingue (now Haiti) and Guadeloupe, these were subsequently hit by a series of massive slave rebellions. Napoleon, as the person responsible for the reinstatement of slavery after the First French Republic had abolished it, was in charge of putting the slave revolts down, and he did so with brutal efficiency. Ribbe claims that some of Napoleon's men refused to do as they were ordered, and then later wrote journals describing the massacre. From these passages, he claims that Napoleon's troops burnt sulphur (readily collected from nearby volcanoes) to make sulphur dioxide gas, which is extremely poisonous. This would have been effective at helping to quell the rebelling Caribbean slaves.
Ribbe's most controversial accusation is that the holds of ships were used as makeshift gas chambers; and that up to 100,000 black slaves were murdered in them. These revelations are still in considerable academic dispute, but when the book was published, the French establishment was quick to condemn his allegations. The French newspaper France Soir, a populist tabloid, for instance, published a stinging editorial, calling the claims of the book insane. The French historian Pierre Branda wrote a critical analysis of Ribbe's book, stating that it is mainly based on suppositions and that the sources are few and often quoted and referred to with heavy omissions.
The book was written in a context of social tension for the bicentenary of Austerlitz and in the same timeframe as the Affaire Olivier Grenouilleau, where the author is strongly implicated. Jérôme Gautheret, in Le Monde, considers that « Le Crime de Napoléon n’est pas un livre d’histoire » "is not a history book" and describes it as « charge polémique dirigée contre les « historiographes officiels » "a polemical charge directed against the "official historiographers"" and a "pamphlet" that does not really contribute to a “critical re-reading of the colonial fact”.[1]
Nicolas Lebourg denounces “this type of anachronism, [...] describing the slave trade as a Holocaust in wedge
Napoleon's Crimes: A Blueprint for Hitler (French: Le Crime de Napoléon) is a book published in 2005 by French writer Claude Ribbe, who is of Caribbean origin. In the book, Ribbe advances the thesis that Napoleon Bonaparte during the Haitian Revolution first used gas chambers as a method of mass execution, 140 years before Hitler and the Nazis. His accusations in the book has caused a minor political and academic storm when it was published, and its premise remains under contention to this day.
In the early 19th century, Napoleon had reinstated slavery in the French colonies of Saint-Domingue (now Haiti) and Guadeloupe, these were subsequently hit by a series of massive slave rebellions. Napoleon, as the person responsible for the reinstatement of slavery after the First French Republic had abolished it, was in charge of putting the slave revolts down, and he did so with brutal efficiency. Ribbe claims that some of Napoleon's men refused to do as they were ordered, and then later wrote journals describing the massacre. From these passages, he claims that Napoleon's troops burnt sulphur (readily collected from nearby volcanoes) to make sulphur dioxide gas, which is extremely poisonous. This would have been effective at helping to quell the rebelling Caribbean slaves.
Ribbe's most controversial accusation is that the holds of ships were used as makeshift gas chambers; and that up to 100,000 black slaves were murdered in them. These revelations are still in considerable academic dispute, but when the book was published, the French establishment was quick to condemn his allegations. The French newspaper France Soir, a populist tabloid, for instance, published a stinging editorial, calling the claims of the book insane. The French historian Pierre Branda wrote a critical analysis of Ribbe's book, stating that it is mainly based on suppositions and that the sources are few and often quoted and referred to with heavy omissions.
The book was written in a context of social tension for the bicentenary of Austerlitz and in the same timeframe as the Affaire Olivier Grenouilleau, where the author is strongly implicated. Jérôme Gautheret, in Le Monde, considers that « Le Crime de Napoléon n’est pas un livre d’histoire » "is not a history book" and describes it as « charge polémique dirigée contre les « historiographes officiels » "a polemical charge directed against the "official historiographers"" and a "pamphlet" that does not really contribute to a “critical re-reading of the colonial fact”.[1]
Nicolas Lebourg denounces “this type of anachronism, [...] describing the slave trade as a Holocaust in wedges
So yes napoleon did commit atrocities
That is true but I meant LESS evil so I didn’t mean not evil at all and most of them were massacres
@@PrVecXD_You said in one comment you meant with the less evil. Not evil at all.
@@PrVecXD_🤓😐
@@7LN7LN7read my comment properly
@@fuxihutterer8088you use the nerd emoji because you can’t think of anything else just don’t say anything
Napoleon is basically a good charectered person👑
W pfp 🥶🥶💯
I seen napoleon movie and isn't he just some cuck and simp for Josephine so who cares about him 😂
Hitler too
@@derteddy7936 Not trying to offend you but, hitler was not a good person he tried to destroy Russia and I’m pretty sure he committed genocides
No @@derteddy7936
an outstanding military genius to be compared to a brutal dictator is literally ludicrous.
A very simple edit, but very good info
Glad you liked it!
When You Realise The Last Fart Wasn't A Fart 😢:
"There's Nothing We Can Do"
"Anyone who sees and paints the sky green and land blue need to be stearlized"
-Austrian Painter
I don't understand who he was referring to. He preferred painting everything red.
Adolf hitler turned into an Austrian painter😂
blitzkrieg absolutely destroys napoleons army bro
I put that
Technology too, 1000 horses can't stand up to a tank or a machine gun.
Y’all forget Napoleon also blitzkrieged his way to victory
@@pajazosdiegoeh if napoleon life in france 1930s he wil win 😮
@@Puro116 Napoleon beat Russia in every battle on Russian soil but the Russians kept escaping capture. The winter was the final nail on the coffin for Napoleons army
Их обьеденяет то что они не смогли победить Россию
Só ganharam usando estratégias da Terra arrasada a favor do seu povo, nunca a Rússia teve um exército para se igualar ao inimigo, um exemplo disso é hoje em dia, vocês estão perdendo pra um país fraco e pequeno igual a Ucrânia. 🇩🇪🇧🇷💪🏽
Не только Россию бред не неси
@@ТимурГудков-м4лтебя это так зацепило, что 2 великих полководца не смогли победить нищую слабую Россию?
@@ТимурГудков-м4лпо сути вся пойна Наполеона и Гитлера была с Россией(СССР) - войны в Африке или во Франции были очень незначительны хотя Америка и Британия описывают эти события как грандиозные - Наполеон самую массовую армию привёл в Россиию и проиграл - опять запад выдумал историю о победе "зиме" - хотя Кутузов тактически переиграл Наполеона - но наврятли покажут и расскажу про это
И Британию
"no genocides"
Oh yeah how about when he was invading Egypt then switched to Gaza and Alareesh when he tried invading Yafa he told their people no blood will be shed, when they let him in he killed every single one of them, totally no genocides.
Maybe because the people of Egypt kept killing his men when he tried to approach them with peace. He wanted to get off of the Mamelukes who kept oppressing the people of that region. Not to mention when Napoleon sent men to send messages they kept getting beheaded and put their heads of those Frenchmen on top of the walls.
Stop trying to imply he committed evil acts like killing for no reason at all.
Not only that, after he left Egypt and left a talented general in charge who wanted to surrender with the british, general Kleber, he got stabbed by a local student.
Hitler : ❌️
Napoleon : ✅️
Not French: Austrian Painter
Are you from the US ?
Hitler is an Austrian painter 😂
*was
@@PrVecXD_ oh ok I don’t really talk about him cause it’s inappropriate thx for telling me 👍🏻✌🏻
Test
*is no longer
@@ParkerPeterTheGoat well hitler almost ruined the world he killed over20m Jews Jews are the people who support god
Bro that Australin painter looks familiar
Yes, but back in the day it was easier to make bigger empire
He just said no genocides lmao 💀💀💀💀😂😂😂😂
Napoleon didn’t commit any genocides
@@thefrenchempire14 bro repeit until you believe it, but i dont care about it , i just found annoying that when its jews its bad but when its everybody else it doesnt matter
@@wtfurlookingat1514 he didn’t commit any genocides tho?
@@thefrenchempire14 yeah yeah bro sure if that makes you sleep better at night keep repeting it
@@wtfurlookingat1514 stop acting like this.just tell me which genocide did he commit?
France Napoleonic: 🥰
Germany Adolf hitler: ☠️
Napoleon was Fr/ita and A.H was Austrian better luck next time History 6
You called Hitler a German 😂
@@JaCh1 ?
I don’t get what ur trying to say
Austrian painter did not invent genocide.
Napoleon massacred a huge number of people, for example in Spain. He reestablished slavery and killed a certain number of black people in Haiti.
Actually he was the Austrian painter of the 19th century.
British propaganda
Obviously he didnt invent genocide there were genocides far bigger then the 3-6 million hitler killed. Stalin in one year before hitler took power killed 5-6 million Ukrainians for example and there were genocides more than 10 times that number before and after hitler
This is true, also im from Spain and they teached me this.
Atrocities commited by the nazis were far worse than all atrocities commited in napolonic wars all sides included
@@kid_toucherwinners always present defeated ones as evil and brutal, to justify their existence and actions. So, yes, in fact none of those two were evil
Finally a guy who isn't a fanboy of moustache man
Austrian painter didn't even lead the army in war but Napoleon did.
Hitla was Commander in Chief
@@PrVecXD_still didn’t lead armies
@Dwaynecockson he took command of leading the Army at Kursk as did Stalin with Soviets
@@Arabmapper12he did
@@X12223 no he did not
*Alexander the Great has entered the chat*
*Ghengis Khan has entered the chat*
*Mikhail Kutuzov has joined Alexander the Great’s group chat*
Genghis Khan is overrated.
Alexander "Who comes to us with the sword will die by that sword" Nevsky opens up a discord call.
Caesar joined the chat
Mao Zedong has entered the chat
Stalin has entered the chat
Hideki Tojo entered the chat
Leopold II of Belgium has entered the chat
The British Empire has entered the chat with its boys the Roman Empire and out of nowhere, the whole Spanish Inquisition.
@MisaelOrtiz-fe6vm pol pot has entered the zoom call
Napoleon had actually treated the Jews less cruel for his time
The funniest thing about Napoleon is that he wasn't evil and didn't provocated battles
It was only Europe trying to defeat him to bring back monarchy in France cause nobody in Europe wanted to get revolutions and empires back
Napoleon only defended France and won all his battles except one who made him lose the control
And he mostly won in wars France was alone against 3-4 countries united
@@LLLynxyyand Germany against the whole world and Napoleon against tiny german states WHO killed eacother
@@fuxihutterer8088lmao, Napoleon faced the Austrian Empire, the Holy Roman Empire / Prussia, the Swedish Empire, the Danish Empire, the Papal States, the Russian Empire, the British Empire, the Ottoman Empire, Portugal, Spain + German States such as Saxony, Wurtemberg, Bavaria, ... + Italian States such as Venice, Naples, Sardinia, ...
When hitler only faced USSR, USA and UK at the same time.
By the way, hitler was the one who declared war on its neighbors and Napoleon was the one attacked by its neighbors.
@@fuxihutterer80886 days 😹
@@LLLynxyyNapoleon raid against Portugal for nothing 💀
Napoleon Bonaparte (born Napoleone di Buonaparte;[1][b] 15 August 1769 - 5 May 1821), later known by his regnal name Napoleon I, was a French military and political leader who rose to prominence during the French Revolution and led a series of successful campaigns across Europe during the Revolutionary Wars and Napoleonic Wars from 1796 to 1815. He was the leader of the French Republic as First Consul from 1799 to 1804, then of the French Empire as Emperor of the French from 1804 to 1814, and briefly again in 1815.
Born on the island of Corsica to a family of Italian origin, Napoleon moved to mainland France in 1779 and was commissioned as an officer in the French Army in 1785. He supported the French Revolution in 1789, and promoted its cause in Corsica. He rose rapidly in the ranks after breaking the siege of Toulon in 1793 and firing on royalist insurgents in Paris on 13 Vendémiaire in 1795. In 1796, Napoleon commanded a military campaign against the Austrians and their Italian allies in the War of the First Coalition, scoring decisive victories and becoming a national hero. He led an expedition to Egypt and Syria in 1798 which served as a springboard to political power. In November 1799, Napoleon engineered the Coup of 18 Brumaire against the Directory, and became First Consul of the Republic. He won the Battle of Marengo in 1800, which secured French victory in the War of the Second Coalition, and in 1803 sold the territory of Louisiana to the United States, which doubled the latter's area. In December 1804, Napoelon crowned himself Emperor of the French, further expanding his power.
The breakdown of the Treaty of Amiens led to the War of the Third Coalition by 1805. Napoleon shattered the coalition with a decisive victory at the Battle of Austerlitz, which led to the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire. In the War of the Fourth Coalition, Napoleon defeated Prussia at the Battle of Jena-Auerstedt in 1806, marched his Grande Armée into Eastern Europe, and defeated the Russians in 1807 at the Battle of Friedland. Seeking to extend his trade embargo against Britain, Napoleon invaded the Iberian Peninsula and installed his brother Joseph as King of Spain in 1808, provoking the Peninsular War, mainly fought by his marshals until 1814. In 1809, the Austrians again challenged France in the War of the Fifth Coalition, in which Napoleon solidified his grip over Europe after winning the Battle of Wagram. In summer 1812, Napoleon launched an invasion of Russia, which ended in the catastrophic retreat of his army that winter. In 1813, Prussia and Austria joined Russia in the War of the Sixth Coalition, in which Napoleon was decisively defeated at the Battle of Leipzig. The coalition invaded France and captured Paris, forcing Napoleon to abdicate in April 1814. They exiled him to the Mediterranean island of Elba and restored the Bourbons to power. In February 1815, Napoleon escaped from Elba and again took control of France in what became known as the "Hundred Days". His opponents responded by forming a Seventh Coalition, which defeated him at the Battle of Waterloo in June 1815. Napoleon was exiled to the remote island of Saint Helena in the South Atlantic, where he died of stomach cancer in 1821, aged 51.
Napoleon is considered one of the greatest military commanders in history and Napoleonic tactics are still studied at military schools worldwide. His legacy endures through the modernizing legal and administrative reforms he enacted in France and Western Europe, embodied in the Napoleonic Code. He established a system of public education,[2] abolished the vestiges of feudalism,[3] emancipated Jews and other religious minorities,[4] abolished the Spanish Inquisition,[5] enacted the principle of equality before the law for an emerging middle class,[6] and centralized state power at the expense of religious authorities.[7] His conquests acted as a catalyst for political change and the development of nation states. However, he is controversial due to his role in wars which devastated Europe, his looting of conquered territories, and his mixed record on civil rights: he abolished the free press, ended directly elected representative government, exiled and jailed critics of his regime, reinstated slavery in France's colonies except for Haiti, banned the entry of blacks and mulattos into France, reduced the civil rights of women and children in France, reintroduced a hereditary monarchy and nobility,[8][9][10] and violently repressed popular uprisings against his rule.[11]
Early life
Napoleon's family was of Italian origin. His paternal ancestors, the Buonapartes, descended from a minor Tuscan noble family who emigrated to Corsica in the 16th century and his maternal ancestors, the Ramolinos, descended from a noble family from Lombardy.[12]
Half-length portrait of a wigged middle-aged man with a well-to-do jacket. His left hand is tucked inside his waistcoat.
Napoleon's father, Carlo Buonaparte, fought for Corsican independence under Pasquale Paoli. After their defeat, he eventually became the island's representative to Louis XVI's court.
Napoleon's parents, Carlo Maria Buonaparte and Maria Letizia Ramolino, lived in the Maison Bonaparte home in Ajaccio, where Napoleon was born on 15 August 1769. He had an elder brother, Joseph, and, later, six younger siblings: Lucien, Elisa, Louis, Pauline, Caroline, and Jérôme.[13] Five more siblings were stillborn or did not survive infancy.[14] Napoleon was baptized as a Catholic, under the name Napoleone di Buonaparte. In his youth, his name was also spelled as Nabulione, Nabulio, Napolionne, and Napulione.[15]
Napoleon was born one year after the Republic of Genoa ceded Corsica to France.[16][c] His father fought alongside Pasquale Paoli during the Corsican war of independence against France. After the Corsican defeat at the Battle of Ponte Novu in 1769 and Paoli's exile in Britain, Carlo became friends with the French governor Charles Louis de Marbeuf, who became his patron and godfather to Napoleon.[20][21] With Mabeuf's support, Carlo was named Corsican representative to the court of Louis XVI and Napoleon obtained a royal bursary to a military academy in France.[22][23]
The dominant influence of Napoleon's childhood was his mother, whose firm discipline restrained a rambunctious child.[22] Later in life, Napoleon said, "The future destiny of the child is always the work of the mother."[24] Napoleon's noble, moderately affluent background afforded him greater opportunities to study than were available to a typical Corsican of the time.[25]
In January 1779, at age 9, Napoleon moved to the French mainland and enrolled at a religious school in Autun to improve his French (his mother tongue was the Corsican dialect of Italian).[26][27][28] Although he eventually became fluent in French, he spoke with a Corsican accent and his French spelling was poor.[29]
In May, he transferred to the military academy at Brienne-le-Château where he was routinely bullied by his peers for his accent, birthplace, short stature, mannerisms, and poor French.[26] He became reserved and melancholic, applying himself to reading. An examiner observed that Napoleon "has always been distinguished for his application in mathematics. He is fairly well acquainted with history and geography ... This boy would make an excellent sailor".[d][31]
One story of Napoleon at the school is that he led junior students to victory against senior students in a snowball fight, which allegedly showed his leadership abilities.[32] But the story was only told after Napoleon had become famous.[33] In his later years at Brienne, Napoleon became an outspoken Corsican nationalist and admirer of Paoli.[34] this isn’t the full story btw
Napoleon owns gen Z rn what are you talking about 💀💀
The far right extremist assholes have word about it
Nah the Austrian painter does 🇩🇪
Napoleon!
If we compare armies *relative* to the armies of the time, Napoleon easily claps. Capturing Berlin in 33 days and 80% of the Prussian army as prisoners whilst marching by foot is more impressive than capturing Paris in 6 weeks by modern roads and engines. Fight me.
I didn’t put anything that relates things with technology and difference between eras to keep it fair so you are right but I just pointed that out
@user-f49kyyo8u My comment was kind of a troll comment, but I'd like to just inform you that the French weren't surrendering cowards during WW2. I don't know a *single* actual historian who will support that claim.
The French army had many issues (lack of radio, lack of freedom for generals to take initiative), but the reason it collapsed so rapidly was that the German generals were able to poke the French line at an area they thought was easily defensible, and only put poorly-trained divisions there. Then, as the Germans broke that line with their tanks, they didn't slow down to wait for their infantry divisions as high command ordered, stopping the French from reinforcing the line with their veteran divisions.
In the end, it was the last stand by those said veteran divisions that gave the British Expeditionary Force *any* chance of survival at Dunkirk. It's very funny that the soldiers who would heroically fight to the death for liberty against the Nazi regime are considered cowards. The rest of the French army in the south afterwards had lost too much equipment and wasn't able to form up a defensive line against the German panzers, and as so was defeated rapidly afterwards.
@@PrVecXD_ That's fair tho, ngl. And to be fair, the Germans had a very modern mindset on warfare on the outset of WW2, although I still think in relative comparison the French armies were more superior to those of their time than the German armies were to those of their said time.
french propaganda bot
The German army captured more than 2 million English and French (the strongest armies on the planet) with extreme ease and with 800-1,000,000 soldiers in less than 1 week
Bro imagine he was so evil even today people are afraid to call or to WRITE his Name...
My view:
If you want some quick win with low casualties > Napoleon
If you really aggresive for wanting to annex big size country > Austrian Painter (with calculation caution)
Napoleon: Yes we are whinig!
Austrian phainter: there is nothing we cane do..........
Fix yo spelling mf
Bro learn to spell
The Austrian painter stereotype has been used so much that now we call him painter more than with his real name
they both have something in common, they forgot to pack winter clothes 💀
”Less evil” that’s hilarious
The comparison alone is an insult to Napoleon. Hitler was stupid and permanently on multiple hard drugs.
Napoleon is a useless piece of 🐖💩
Painter is way better and greatest in history 🙋🏻
@utekaltenbachpokrant7597how do you know it's not true?
the irony of you calling someone stupid while listing 2 completely idiotic things as facts
Both failed in russia because they underestimated the power of winter
underestimated the power of winter V
underestimated the enemy X
Imagine Trying to take over the world cus you got rejected from an art school 💀
@StaalThe2ndXVIIyassss
If he got accepted as painter, WW2 wouldn’t happen
How napoleon empire size is more than the “Austrian painter” dictatorship empire
Thats not the point @utekaltenbachpokrant7597
Hitler:❌
Austrian painter:😐
My great grandpa:✅
💀😬
All French Watched This Video/Tous Les Français Qui Ont Vu Cette Vidéo
👇
lol that painter looks like my dad that has left me for milk
Napoleon looks like a nice guy
They where both terribly evil
napoleo wasent that evil he still was a bit but compared to hitler he wasent at all. he did no genocides and created a code that is still used to these days
Napoleon fighted for power there is nothing honorable to say about him and hitler.
Yes, especially not to protect the new government established from the invasion of all of Europe.
The Eagle is always hungry, they say...
"Sir, it's WWII, what can we do?"
"There's nothing we CAN do."