yeah... obviously it's 4.7k views. The right inevitably forgets about their grifters. Shepherd never gave a shit about the right wing stuff, but that was the only thing that made her even remotely recognizable. The grift cannot continue forever, unless you're Shapiro or Dave Rubin.
Best wishes to you. Things might get worse before they get better, but a lot of people are starting to speak up and criticize the bullshit that is going on in universities.
Most adults have been thoroughly propagandized through the education system, all forms of media and by others that have had the same indoctrination and developed believe systems. Now they throw in what you can speak about on a subject that is relatively new in our language and understanding and in fact could have healthy debates on what constitutes transgender conditions. Looking at the number of suicides across the country on those that made from hormone to total physical changes with their bodies at a young age and then so remorseful for doing that and their is no trail back to where they started from. To me this is criminal. What is worse is never being allowed to have open discussions and debates on this topic and others in society today. Having "safe rooms" in colleges and other nonsense. If someone is not emotionally stable to have adult discussions they should not be in college. PERIOD! Most people world wide accept the dogma of media, movie producers and directors, the actors, the books written as first person events on the Holocaust, but to look at that part of history, WW1, the Bolshevik Revolution, WW2, and the history of Europe and what has since these wars been brought to the worlds attention as facts from years of unbiased research, scientific examination and much more has a huge chunk of society too afraid to look. They feel they will turn to stone if they want the truth and all the evidence and not just the dogma you are to accept as truth. So, is that how history repeats itself? Is ignorance bliss? God bless Lindsay Shepherd for stepping up and fighting the nonsense. Her mother is also a great partner with her it seems. College and Universities are about the money donations and not the education.
Why have you disabled the comments on your video discussing a totalitarian dictator? Are you not an advocate for open discussion and free speech? If you are, enable comments. If you aren't, then you're closer to Hitler's totalitarian psyche than you think. There's so much to discuss from your video that I'd need days to write a complete response. But here's a couple of things: Your video massively misinterprets JP's ideas. In essence JP states that the difference between regular people and Hitler was that Hitler had ambition and organisational power. This is true. Or else 95% of the German population would not have supported Hitler. Hitler was a manifestation of the collective thoughts and feelings of the people. That is very different to justifying Hitler. He is saying that the evil of Hitler exists within all of us, in most people unconsciously. And we better be aware of it and reconcile that vengeful, bitter, blaming, discriminatory part of ourselves before it bursts out in extreme political hatred (on the right or left). JP mentions Hitler was extremely orderly. Then you note how his second book is titled Beyond Order, seemingly alluding that JP thinks we should go even further beyond what Hitler did. Again, huge misinterpretation. If you read his book, Beyond Order, it's about going beyond the notions of order and structure (that would include totalitarianism) and allowing a healthy degree of uncertainty and chaos (that would be free speech and democracy). Furthermore, when he tells people to become more orderly, do you seriously think he's implying that we should become more like the Nazi's? He's not. You need order regardless. In fact, it was order within and between the allies that enabled us to fight against Nazi Germany and win. Order is necessary. And so is some uncertainty. I hope this helps clarify some of your misrepresentations of his work. All the best.
@@lukeusriley Okay, but Peterson has no expertise or credentials in this area, so he's just making ignorant, opinionated noise and gushing Jungian woo-woo. To say that it was order that allowed the opponents of the nazis to combat the order of the nazis is just superficial stupidity. All planning and coordination requires order, which suggest that Peterson is a master of convoluted trivialities.
@@highroller-jq3ix You're right in that he is not a historian. He is, however, a psychologist heavily influences by Jungian ideas. As an aside, Jung himself was assigned by the CIA to provide information on the mental state of Hitler. Anyways, Peterson is providing a look at history (in this case specifically Hitler and Nazi Germany) through a depth psychology lense. It's probably a good idea to understand how and why movements like Nazism and people like Hitler can come to power. If we don't understand a problem, how are we expected to resolve it, or stop it from reoccuring? A psychological perspective contributes (partially) to resolving it. So yes, the views of an academic specialising in psychology are valid and useful to this subject, just as those in the field of history, sociology, economics, foreign affairs etc. are. To your point about the superficiality of stating that the opponents to Nazism also needed order... Peterson didn't say that, I did. It was a response to the video claiming that Peterson, by mentioning Hitler's orderliness and years later writing a book about the benefits of order, is somehow advocating Nazism. Clearly order can be used for both good and bad. This was the point Peterson was trying to make and my example was used to elucidate that. I hope this makes sense. Appreciate the discussion.
I really appreciate this video and the sacrifices Lindsay and others have made in the search for truth and freedom of speech. Thanks for sharing!
Only 4.7K views? This is important stuff and should have been seen by 4.7 million. Thanks!
yeah... obviously it's 4.7k views. The right inevitably forgets about their grifters. Shepherd never gave a shit about the right wing stuff, but that was the only thing that made her even remotely recognizable. The grift cannot continue forever, unless you're Shapiro or Dave Rubin.
Lindsay Shepherd is a very brave woman👏
Mixing it up and bringing things up which make others stop and think, and maybe be uncomfortable is great.
Thanks for posting this meeting.
Thgank you.
Best wishes to you. Things might get worse before they get better, but a lot of people are starting to speak up and criticize the bullshit that is going on in universities.
Most adults have been thoroughly propagandized through the education system, all forms of media and by others that have had the same indoctrination and developed believe systems. Now they throw in what you can speak about on a subject that is relatively new in our language and understanding and in fact could have healthy debates on what constitutes transgender conditions. Looking at the number of suicides across the country on those that made from hormone to total physical changes with their bodies at a young age and then so remorseful for doing that and their is no trail back to where they started from. To me this is criminal. What is worse is never being allowed to have open discussions and debates on this topic and others in society today. Having "safe rooms" in colleges and other nonsense. If someone is not emotionally stable to have adult discussions they should not be in college. PERIOD!
Most people world wide accept the dogma of media, movie producers and directors, the actors, the books written as first person events on the Holocaust, but to look at that part of history, WW1, the Bolshevik Revolution, WW2, and the history of Europe and what has since these wars been brought to the worlds attention as facts from years of unbiased research, scientific examination and much more has a huge chunk of society too afraid to look. They feel they will turn to stone if they want the truth and all the evidence and not just the dogma you are to accept as truth.
So, is that how history repeats itself? Is ignorance bliss?
God bless Lindsay Shepherd for stepping up and fighting the nonsense. Her mother is also a great partner with her it seems.
College and Universities are about the money donations and not the education.
academic freedom in the west? ask about that a certain canadian psychology professor put into "reeducation" camp...
Do you mean the former professor who has turned into a wingnut propagandist and a disgrace to the field of clinical psychology?
@@highroller-jq3ix lol. enjoy your "freedom" of speech and thought...
Every despotic regime has started this way. And there are plenty of left-leaning people who are horrified by this despotism.
Why did youtube recommend me some random video of Benedict Cumberbatch and Mia Khalifa?
Lindsay is hot!
By the way, did you not notice her neck is way too long for her body. Yeah, long hair hides that creepy sht.
@@kwahujakquai6726 you seem nice. not
@@kwahujakquai6726 Her necks not too long. You have no neck. You're just saying that.
No , not just making it difficult and expensive for right leaning speakers but also classic liberals and middle of the road speakers ...
I wonder if the lady at 55.00 has woken up by now...
lol!! hilarious! awesome!
I think this changes things considerably:
ruclips.net/video/JffW5gLGvu0/видео.html. Turns out JP is more like AH than you might think.
Comments disabled lmao.
JP explaining why Hitler was even worse than you thought ruclips.net/video/jMqQBLZwRIE/видео.html
Why have you disabled the comments on your video discussing a totalitarian dictator? Are you not an advocate for open discussion and free speech? If you are, enable comments. If you aren't, then you're closer to Hitler's totalitarian psyche than you think.
There's so much to discuss from your video that I'd need days to write a complete response. But here's a couple of things:
Your video massively misinterprets JP's ideas. In essence JP states that the difference between regular people and Hitler was that Hitler had ambition and organisational power. This is true. Or else 95% of the German population would not have supported Hitler. Hitler was a manifestation of the collective thoughts and feelings of the people. That is very different to justifying Hitler. He is saying that the evil of Hitler exists within all of us, in most people unconsciously. And we better be aware of it and reconcile that vengeful, bitter, blaming, discriminatory part of ourselves before it bursts out in extreme political hatred (on the right or left).
JP mentions Hitler was extremely orderly. Then you note how his second book is titled Beyond Order, seemingly alluding that JP thinks we should go even further beyond what Hitler did. Again, huge misinterpretation. If you read his book, Beyond Order, it's about going beyond the notions of order and structure (that would include totalitarianism) and allowing a healthy degree of uncertainty and chaos (that would be free speech and democracy). Furthermore, when he tells people to become more orderly, do you seriously think he's implying that we should become more like the Nazi's? He's not. You need order regardless. In fact, it was order within and between the allies that enabled us to fight against Nazi Germany and win. Order is necessary. And so is some uncertainty.
I hope this helps clarify some of your misrepresentations of his work.
All the best.
@@lukeusriley Okay, but Peterson has no expertise or credentials in this area, so he's just making ignorant, opinionated noise and gushing Jungian woo-woo. To say that it was order that allowed the opponents of the nazis to combat the order of the nazis is just superficial stupidity. All planning and coordination requires order, which suggest that Peterson is a master of convoluted trivialities.
@@highroller-jq3ix You're right in that he is not a historian. He is, however, a psychologist heavily influences by Jungian ideas. As an aside, Jung himself was assigned by the CIA to provide information on the mental state of Hitler. Anyways, Peterson is providing a look at history (in this case specifically Hitler and Nazi Germany) through a depth psychology lense. It's probably a good idea to understand how and why movements like Nazism and people like Hitler can come to power. If we don't understand a problem, how are we expected to resolve it, or stop it from reoccuring? A psychological perspective contributes (partially) to resolving it. So yes, the views of an academic specialising in psychology are valid and useful to this subject, just as those in the field of history, sociology, economics, foreign affairs etc. are.
To your point about the superficiality of stating that the opponents to Nazism also needed order... Peterson didn't say that, I did. It was a response to the video claiming that Peterson, by mentioning Hitler's orderliness and years later writing a book about the benefits of order, is somehow advocating Nazism. Clearly order can be used for both good and bad. This was the point Peterson was trying to make and my example was used to elucidate that.
I hope this makes sense. Appreciate the discussion.
*I miss living in Waterloo*