+Anoop Kumar Exactly my thoughts! She put up more of a stink about it than the ballboy did! She couldn't give two shits about if the ballboy was ok. She wanted an easy win and that's pathetic.
Agreed. It's not clear if it was intentional or not. But either way, the other player getting involved is a bad show. It's as if she's saying I want my opponent disqualified because I'm not sure I can beat her in a fair contest.
I don't think Broady really cared about the ball boy... looks to me like she was trying to profit off a mistake made by Ostapenko and win a match against a better player using tricks.
Completely wrong. She wanted the right call to be made. The shock it wasn't, caused her to lose control and forget she isn't the judge. It was all emotions. Not tactics.
Tayden I bet she was spoiled as a child. Did you see her rubbing it in her face at the end of the match. Poor sportsmanlike conduct by both of them. Millennials...
@@arung7205 nick is far far super talented than her ...do charity works and have a tennis foundation...its just his mental temper things those leads him to shitty path.
D. R. It really has been a long time but, the attitude is very important. Your opponent has made a mistake but that reaction is disgraceful. That is what I wanted to point out . And also where you end up with the wrong competitiveness...
I genuinely thought Broady was concerned about the ballboy. Turns out she just wanted her opponent disqualified. Both were incredibly unprofessional in my opinion. You should never throw a racket as it is potentially dangerous and she was no where near the ball in fairness. Broady accused her of deliberately throwing the racket at the ball boy but didn't have the decency to see if he was okay. Poor from both players.
@@Graziano45 she gave absolutely no concern to the ballboy who was hit with a racket. Her instincts were to try and win a tennis match instead of checking on the well being of a child. Very unprofessional in my opinion
@@philtaylor5592 Saidi is correct. Throwing the racket and hitting someone is enough for being disqualified. Broady, although she didnt give a toss about the boy, its not her concern. She was right to call this out.
The racket did not hit the ballboy, was cetainly close but the images show that It does not reach him. So it was very unfair and triky try to get a disqualification of her opponenent, like she did
@@doct0rnic I am saying that although Brody was the one moaning, Ostepenko is ALWAYS complaining and bending rules and shouting at umpires and taking unnecessary medical breaks to slow the action so the shoe was on the other foot.
The game has rules. She is within her right to seek a penalty if she thinks there was a violation. A pro should not be reduced to okay I guess I am cool with it. The umpire should be held to enforcing the rules.
@@chevy4x466 she is within her right, but she also expresses to the whole world how pathetic she is, she knew she can't beat her opponent so she went all out to try and get her opponent disqualified. It shows her character, and it's a poor one. Ironically is she didn't even need to do it, she could have kept her mouth shut and not interfere with the judges and the result would have still been the same, but of course her character doesn't allow her to not interfere and try to get her opponent sent off.
Cheers for generalising mate, no true sportsman would want to win because of this but of course since she’s British she wants to because she’s greedy. What a tosser
She threw her racket at the ballboy so there's no denying that she should of been DQ. She didn't mean to hurt him but it's gross disrespect. That ballboy is just doing a job. He isn't being paid to be disrespected like that. That said, Broady made herself look bad by making such a big deal out of it. She should of left the decision to those responsible for making these decisions.
It amuses me how many people are ranting that "she doesn't care about the ball boy." Where does she claim she cares about the ball boy?? There are rules about throwing your racket, smashing your racket, arguing with officials etc that ALL players are subject too. She's arguing that ostapenko has committed a racket infringement, that is really serious, because it ended up hitting a ball boy. Do I think she should have argued about it so much and got distracted and emotional about it? No, she shouldn't have. But all this straw man bullshit that she's supposedly "pretending to care" about the ball boy is nonsense.
Did you see what happened to Djokovic? He unintentionally kicked a ball and accidentally hit the lines woman, gets defaulted. It didn't slip her hand, she threw it out of frustration. Accidentally hits a ball boy. She should have been defaulted.
Yeah yeah look what happened with djokovici and he just hit a ball slowly that accidentaly hit the line refere... ostapenko is realy stupid if that raket hit the ballboy in the eye he can remain blind...
@@JohnSmith-ki2hlHow? Her entire breakdown was about trying to get her opponent in as much trouble as possible so she could get a cheap win. She had no care whatsoever as to whether the ball boy was OK.
Broady did poor at Wimbledon. Out in first round of qualifiers. Out in first round of doubles. Out in first round of mixed. Goes out first round of most things she enters to be honest
It doesn't matter. Rules don't only apply for the top players. All those non top players are still fighting for rank and in turn sponsorship and media coverage. The other player threw - or released - her racket and it struck a ballboy in the shoulder. There should have been a penalty for that and not just a warning. Both of them look like Karens to me but Broady was right. They official went too easy on her. Other players in tennis did the exact same and were DQ'd, but she didn't even lose a point.
@@jcasetnl only question is who gives a fuck?! I just watched Sinner v Kyrgios in Miami, Sinner just went on with his business while Kyrgios went bat shit crazy. That’s a true champion right there, not someone who whines about how their opponent didn’t get disqualified. And from her record, it seems pretty obvious she did that to get a easy win
+Mick Rumping And if it were not for Broady, nothing would have happened to Ostapenko, meaning the rule that the tennis federation put in place meant NOTHING. When you see something wrong, you speak up!! That's how change is made and how progress is made. You DON'T look the other way...!
No one ignored rules. Ostapenko was penalized. This issue here is Broady's ugly, self-serving, self-righteous and dishonourable behaviour. Broady is disgraceful here. No class whatsoever.
Doesn't matter if the racket throw was intentional or not, Brody does not care about what happens. She was emotional and just wanted anything she can get to win the match. Ostapenko gave her the two points she needed so she can celebrate a very rare win.
@@jamesc8709 rules are rules simple as she should have been disqualified otherwise you open the gate for every player to claim it was an accident when they throw their racket or hit the ball in aggression in someones direction
It's disgusting how she tried to squeeze something out of this that would be advantageous to her in some way. Those fake tears were not for the ball boy - she couldn't care less about the boy. Instead, she was angry she didn't get her opponent punished. Absolutely horrible behavior.
@@beardan76 What the fuck are you talking about? What freaking rules? She tried to use an unfortunate event that hurt a ball boy to get an undeserved advantage in the game. She cried fake tears and displayed incredibly sportsmanlike behavior. Don't even try to defend her behavior.
@@beardan76 Exactly, how pathetic is that. Faking tears and putting up an entire act just to avoid having to compete with someone you apparently deem a superior player. Trying to cheat your way through. That's pretty much the definition of unsportsmanlike behavior. It's like a soccer player trying to get a penalty by dropping to the ground as soon as one of the opponents even touches him. Absolutely horrible.
+Rajeev Shrivastava exactly, but the way the media span the story was that she had somehow clearly targeted the ball-boy which it's obvious from the footage she did not.
+croydonrudeness I agree she did not target the ball boy - but that was a very hard throw and she did it in a fit of anger and frustration. It showed reckless disregard for other people in the area. She's lucky that racquet did not hit the ball boy or worse yet fly over the wall and clobber a spectator. If that had happened I believe she would have been disqualified and justly sanctioned by the ITF
@@sailorman8668 it means that, just as if she hit the ball blindly in frustration and the ball went into the stands and hit someone. That's what u call an ACCIDENT.
@@1deonlucas9 If a player hits a ball into the stands full of people, why would it be surprising that a spectator would bet hit? The same with a thrown racket. There are dozens of people who are standing/sitting courtside - why would it be surprising if someone got hit by a thrown racket? In fact, we shouldn't be surprised at all, as someone WAS hit by the thrown racket. It's almost as if you don't think the player should have received any censure/penalty at all, for their reckless actions?
@@sailorman8668 I see your point. It's just that it seems obvious that it's not intentional. It's all about intent. The player hits a ball blindly out of frustration. You think the player is thinking "let me hit someone"? My point is that it was an accidental incident and not a big deal.
@@1deonlucas9 Indeed, the racket wasn't specifically thrown at the ballboy, but nevertheless, the racket was deliberately thrown, which should incur a default point for racket abuse, at the least. The reaction of the other player was ridiculous. Anybody would think that she was the one who was hit by the racket, lol.
@@weston9106 The rule is that if you throw a racket and it strikes someone, you are disqualified regardless of intent. The umpire erred by not enforcing that rule.
Damn who are these bags giving women in tennis a bad rep? When Djok hit the line judge on accident, he immediately checked on them, apologized, respectfully listened to the official, and walked off.
And Nole got disqualified but she didn't?? Where's the logic. She literally threw a whole RACKET on a ball boy and did not even care or ask if they were okay. While Nole hit one with a ball by accident and checked on them and everything, but still got disqualified 😐
@@grantmalone probably cause of the lack of sportsmanship? Could have been a lot worse and that woman that got hit ended up fine... What logic are you struggling with?
@@grantmalone What do you mean lol? Umpires literally give point penalties for unsportsmanlike conduct(i.e smashing racquets) all the time? Which, in reality, harms no one but the players' pockets. Do you watch tennis? "The woman ended up fine, the boy was fine throughout. " So why was the latter disqualified? Both were fine regardless. I'm actually struggling to understand your logic here
@@grantmalone And what exactly is the point of your previous post smartarse? Aren't you implying that the Djokovic situation is justified? Or you just making a "nothing" statement? "Badly hurt" she recovered in a few minutes, or like you said "ended up fine"...You realise enabling bad behaviour, regardless of what happened can lead to consequences in the future? And you didn't even take in what I wrote about umpires cause you're clearly a vain individual. I can see why you lurk here to insult people cause there's no way you can have conversation with other people. No, you can't help - you can barely help yourself. I'm out, peace
Not defending Ostapenko but Broady's behaviour here is probably the most pathetic thing I've ever seen on a tennis court. And I've watched probably around a thousand games by this point.
***** As I said, I was referring to the behaviour of players, and not to some knife stabbing maniac. "Pathetic" is not the first thing that comes to mind when I think about the Seles incident either btw, "terrifying" is more suitable. Now go troll elsewhere, I'm done feeding you.
Well, I wouldn't say most pathetic seen I've seen on a tennis court, but certainly on that court. The way she BEGGED for help with the match by attempting to manipulate the situation should have gotten HER a misconduct penalty.
What about actually going up to the ballboy and making sure he's okay and sincerely apologizing rather than doing that half-hearted hand gesture thing that tennis players love to do.
@@CDogBeast1992 and we all knew novak’s was really accidental and still he got DQed. Ostapenko should have gotten DQed. So fitting cause DQ also means Drama Queen
paul lespage That made me laugh! In fact it almost made me do a little bit of wee in my pants 😊. It's comments like that which make RUclips all the more worthwhile 😁
I think she should have been disqualified, rackets are heavy and can seriously hurt a person. Professionalism at all times on the courts. Many players are getting away with way too much. Keep the integrity of the game and carry yourselves as mature adults.
It's weird to see Broady who didn't commit the violation -- and who's actually winning -- being so upset over this. True champions don't beg an umpire to disqualify their opponents. They want to fight and crush them.
Even as a viewer, I'd want to see this game forfeited. It would suck buying tickets to a canceled game. But there needs to be consequences for things like this.
Broady was looking for an easy way out. I never in my life saw something like this. When I first saw the video, Broady was soooo upset and protesting left and right to the umpire, I thought it was SHE who was accused of throwing her racket at the ball boy. When I realized she was petitioning the ump to DQ her opponent, I thought...."wow, shameless."
Exactly. What a f***ing selfish drama queen. It was none of her business and obviously not her call. Not to mention that it was clear that however the boy was hit, there was clearly no significant injury. Ostapenko got a code violation which was entirely appropriate. Ridiculous and pathetic for an opponent to argue for a DQ. If you wanna make those calls, then become a chair ump.
Not an easy way out. But fairness. It could have been her and she could have been penalised heavily. Of course we wouldn’t know if that will be the case, that’s why she wants fairness.
@@gozer825 the racket hit the wall and then the ball boy. this girl fired the racket in anger. djokovic did not hit the ball in anger, he was just getting rid of the ball and hit it to a bad place. the difference is just the reaction of the individual hit.
She did let the racquet go but she wasnt throwing it wanting to hit the ballboy! Broady won the point what the hell does she want? Why is she complaining!? I mean it wasnt right obviusly but you are not the one who has to complain!
+Raul Cercea she was trying to get the umpire to see that it wasn't an accident as the umpire wasn't go to punish Ostapenko for trowing the racquet. i know she wasn't aiming for the ballboy but still she shouldn't have thrown it and good on Naomi for stepping up for that ballboy who did get hit because that girl shouldn't have thrown the racquet so i agree with Naomi the girl needed to be penalised for it
+Jordan francis She clearly wasn't concerned about the ballboy's welfare. Her entire rant was about getting the other girl disqualified. Broady was shameful and dishonourable.
For example a few years ago a player was suspended for months because they hit a lines person with a ball. It wasn't intentional but it still happened and the player was punished.
To me Broady is the one to be negative here. Her try to convince the umpire Ostapenko intentionally hit the ball boy is pathetic, it's not her job to decide. She is so miserable.
I remember a men's match. The player threw his racquet at a CURTAIN. It hit about 5-6 feet from a line umpire. It continued and hit her at like 2 mph. She folded like a deck chair and insisted on medical help. She was in her 60s and should have been in a rest home.
And where is broady now?? Working as a part-time tennis commentator and slaving away in ITF events and qualies of second-tier WTA events, while Ostapenko is in top 20 and has won a grandslam already? 🤭🤫🤣
Let me ask you something. Does e every engineer become the CEO of a company? No. Does every musician becomes world renowned? No. There are always players better than you but the main thing in a sport or in life is to survive. Broady is still surviving and it's going pretty well for her.
Willy Severus Dude, you’re wallowing in a causal fallacy like a toddler playing in his own shit. Ostapenko’s later tour success is not the result of her being the sort of twat who’d chuck a racquet at a ball boy and then lie about it.
I can’t bear fake emotions...feel like slapping that red top player....if u really cared then u wud have asked that ball boy if he is ok...but no..u r making a mountain of an ant hill...shameful
I wanted to slap that silly bitch to smithereens, too. What a stupid and OTT display of emotions. If you watch this half way (after the racket had been thrown) and only when Broady is talking to the referee, you may think that something have gone really wrong and she is incredibly upset over it.
The racket was thrown on purpose, but not aimed at ball boy on purpose. A penalty was certainly in order for throwing racket, but entirely up to umpire. Brody's behavior after was a disgrace.
@@dorian763 I stand corrected, she intended to throw the racket at the ground once she saw she couldn't reach that ball, but changed her mind and tried to stop herself in the very last millisecond, which caused her to lose the grip and even miss the ground. Brody's behavior was still a disgrace. What a terrible person.
@@bjornlangoren3002 even if she wanted to throw it on purpose calling a person terrible because of that is just miserable... You are the only disgrace here
@@dorian763 do you understand names? The person I called Terrible was Brody. You know, the one who demonstrably interjected herself to lobby for disqualification, when it had absolutely nothing to do with her. There is no mind reading involved in that. She used words so we could hear what she said. Are you drunk, or just a bit slow?
Djokovic was DQ'd for hitting a ball. Anyone in the men's would be DQ'd for throwing their racket like this and they know it. Anyone who says the women are treated unfairly need to watch this.
Look I’m a Brit and I always want our sportsmen and women to do well but I seriously haven’t a clue what Broady is playing at here. It’s an accident, you won the point - get on with the bloody game
The throw was intentional out of frustration, but the hit was accidental. She wasn't even looking at the ballboy so there was no intent to hit him, she just miscalculated where the racket landed. On the otherhand, Broady should be penalized for unsportmanslike conduct, she wasn't concerned about the ballboy at all, she just wanted her opponent to get disqualified for an easy win. How lame.
She clearly did not throw it AT the ballboy. Yes, she threw it intentionally but her head was down and she didn't see him standing there. It hit him accidentally. She waved to him immediately indicating it was an accident.
Thats not the point. There are rules in the game. If you throw you raquet intentionally and it unluckily hits someone you should be disqualified. Main thing is she got the balls and eventually won THAT game. End of the story.
@@adil8701 1) That wasn't a game... it was a tiebreaker. 2) she didn't win it, she lost it, and the match. 3) Yes, she should be dq'd, but it is NOT Brody's job to cry about it to the umpire. To me it was clear that she didn't mean to hit him, but that means nothing, just like with Joker. She shouldn't have been that frustrated to swing her racquet like that, let alone let it slip from her hands. FYI I've lost my racquet on a serve many times due to sweat... just saying.. it happens. To me it didn't look like she even meant to throw it, she was just swinging at air in frustration and lost the grip, but that is STILL her fault. She let her emotions get the best of her, and she showed little remorse.
@@basedbear1605 i was talking about broady when i said that "she won the game" For the rest i understand your opinion but then according to you player should just follow umpires décisions and never challenge. But it is accepted to challenge for balls touching or not lines or the net so why not for severe violations like that ?
@@adil8701 You hallucinate. You literally just made up a straw man argument, assuming my position and putting words into my mouth. You conflate a SUBJECTIVE call (was the throwing of the racquet intentional or not - that is 100% the ref's opinion/ruling) with balls touching the line, which is OBJECTIVE and easily proven with a replay. Wanna try again? Oh, and when you use a pronoun in response to the OP, it's inferred that you're talking about the subject that the OP used in his sentence... which was Ostapenko. So yeah, work on your writing skills.
Broa is a little cry baby. The racket wasnt even close. Still she shouldnt have thrown it but to start crying and asking for a disqualification shows she isnt a true sports competitor.
Broady is classless, so unsportsmanlike of her. Sure, it wasn't accidental but Ostapenko definitely did not meant to hit the ball boy, she was aiming for the ball.
Why the fuck does Broady care what the fuck happens, what a poor excuse of a human being. She is just trying to jump on any opportunity she gets... She nearly started crying as well ;D
My assessment: PINK was the total loser. PURPLE lost a point and out of frustration, she accidentally let go of her racket, which flew over towards the ball boy. (PURPLE's eyes weren't even on the ball boy.) But PINK sensed she could capitalize on this opportunity and have her opponent disqualified. And if not that, distract her opponent so badly as PINK was about to serve. if there was any unsportsmanlike behavior displayed here, it was from PINK.
Ostapenko did wave an apology to the ball boy. She lost her cool and immediately apologized. I don't see a problem with her. Broady is the problem here.
I admire the interviewer's professionalism at the end of the Match. He did not make a mention of the Ball Boy incident and kept what is relevant in the match. A lot of interviewers would have milked that incident for sensationalism.
SPIRIT DOT She did not throw it directly at the ball boy. She did throw the racket but did not aim it at the ball boy. I think at her level of play and physical control of the racket, had she intended to hit, she would have hit him. I agree it's was unsportsmanlike conduct and she was penalized by receiving a code violation. That was settled in the match as the ball boy was not hit and not a actual offense to disqualify someone. Unless it was a repeat offense. Her opponent made it abundantly clear how she felt about it during the match. Not really relevant to the match an no reason to bring it into the interview. Btw calling someone an. " Asshole " just because you disagree with them does not sound like proper protocol, on the subject of sportsmanship but if that is the way you want to conduct yourself.
OMG, I identify with your comment wholeheartedly, and what do ya know....66 likes to this comment (as I see it). I've been seeing that number pop up so much lately on meaningful things to me. It's eerie.
Rules should apply equally to everyone. She should have been disqualified, if it was a line umpire or someone in the crowd she would have, instead it was a ball boy
She threw her racket but not 'at' the ball boy, stupid and deserved a caution but I'm not sure it even did hit anyone. Poor form from the Brit though, no need to get involved. A lot about nothing really.
@@roybaty7439 check the rules just because you are a top ranked player doesn't mean it's OK to randomly throw your racket around with any thought of the little people, yes the crying was over the top but I respect her sense of fair play. The umpires are there to apply the rules not show favoritism
The throw was intentional, but I don't think it was intentional to hit the ball boy.
the ball is to far to get to.. the racket throw was intentional
Yeah, thats my guess. And I think the other player should let the umpire decide.
it doesn't matter if she didnt mean to hit the ballboy she intentionally threw the rachet therefore should of been disqualified.
The empire lol
So if I get a gun and fire it in to a crowd of people but not aiming for anyone should I be punished? I wasn't intentionally trying to hit anyone.
She doesn't care if the ballboy is ok, but instead she wants a point penalty smh...
+Anoop Kumar She didn't want a point penalty. She wanted the opponent to lose the entire match!
+Anoop Kumar Exactly my thoughts! She put up more of a stink about it than the ballboy did! She couldn't give two shits about if the ballboy was ok. She wanted an easy win and that's pathetic.
+Anoop Kumar She's just a big drama queen. I mean she almost cried on the court. WTF!!!
+Anoop Kumar So true>>>>
Ball kids aren't allowed to say she threw it at the unless it is obvious because it will look bad
I really hate when a player argues that their opponent should be disqualified. It's just poor sportsmanship.
The last time I watched a match was Jimmy Connors so what do I know.
No. It's not. Ostapenko is an entitled bratty POS with anger management issues
Then what’s the point of having rules if you just disregard them when it’s convenient?
Agreed. It's not clear if it was intentional or not. But either way, the other player getting involved is a bad show. It's as if she's saying I want my opponent disqualified because I'm not sure I can beat her in a fair contest.
@@PeteWildman-w3e Except that she was already winning in the fair contest.
The ballboy was the only one who didnt complain.
Nor did his balls.
L O L !
He should not have to. The umpire should know that it was a code violation. Duh
I don't think Broady really cared about the ball boy... looks to me like she was trying to profit off a mistake made by Ostapenko and win a match against a better player using tricks.
so true :')
Exactly!
Completely wrong. She wanted the right call to be made. The shock it wasn't, caused her to lose control and forget she isn't the judge. It was all emotions. Not tactics.
Tayden I bet she was spoiled as a child. Did you see her rubbing it in her face at the end of the match. Poor sportsmanlike conduct by both of them. Millennials...
Ya I feel the same
Today, Ostapenko is 37th in WTA ranking, Broady is 330th... attitude says it all...disgraceful really
Thanks i wouldnt have looked that up. I feel redeemed. Broady was clearly the disgraceful one.
Short term gain long term loss. You can def see her attitude won’t make her a champ. She’s the nick kygrios of female tennis
@@arung7205 nick is far far super talented than her ...do charity works and have a tennis foundation...its just his mental temper things those leads him to shitty path.
D. R. It really has been a long time but, the attitude is very important. Your opponent has made a mistake but that reaction is disgraceful. That is what I wanted to point out . And also where you end up with the wrong competitiveness...
Kagan Çetin rankings dont say annything... throw a racket at a ballboy/girl in my club... auto DQ.....
I genuinely thought Broady was concerned about the ballboy. Turns out she just wanted her opponent disqualified. Both were incredibly unprofessional in my opinion. You should never throw a racket as it is potentially dangerous and she was no where near the ball in fairness. Broady accused her of deliberately throwing the racket at the ball boy but didn't have the decency to see if he was okay. Poor from both players.
Accurate analysis.
The saddest part is that she won the match 😿
Broady is hardly the one to blame here, she have the right to call for Ostapenko to be disqualified.
@@Graziano45 she gave absolutely no concern to the ballboy who was hit with a racket. Her instincts were to try and win a tennis match instead of checking on the well being of a child. Very unprofessional in my opinion
@@philtaylor5592 Saidi is correct. Throwing the racket and hitting someone is enough for being disqualified. Broady, although she didnt give a toss about the boy, its not her concern. She was right to call this out.
How you manage to come out the worst in a situation where the other person could have harmed someone speaks volumes of your character.
Came out worst?? She won. I don't even watch tennis anymore or know either one of these
@@micheleh5269 That’s obviously not what he means smh
fact!
Tell that to the Chinese player the other day.
People get hit 15x worst in sports allll the time , dont be a lil sissy.
That's it. Djokovic should have used a racket.
😂
@@hirendrall7215 Nobody chocked and screamed here. That's the difference.
That old lady exaggerated the scene. That's why he disqualified
😅
🤣
@@aruljebin she should've given an audition for Hollywood , man she would do great
nice one
why did I watch this.
for the purple mini mini mini mini skirt
+Jonathan O'Brien true
cat scratch fever
lol, me too. No; not the purple skirt; the black skirt :)
I'm a simple man.....I see hot women in tiny skirts with nipples poking out, I click.
Broady really wanted that default win man 😂 😂 she didn’t give a shit about the ball kid
The racket did not hit the ballboy, was cetainly close but the images show that It does not reach him. So it was very unfair and triky try to get a disqualification of her opponenent, like she did
Yes, she got emotional because she thought that was obvious that Ostapenko will be disqualified. It didn’t happen and that is why she almost cry 🤣
@@michelemasini569 ostepenko is always looking to twist rules or complain to get an advantage so it was karma.
@@yomo1690 dont you mean Brody? She was the one arguing with the umpire
@@doct0rnic I am saying that although Brody was the one moaning, Ostepenko is ALWAYS complaining and bending rules and shouting at umpires and taking unnecessary medical breaks to slow the action so the shoe was on the other foot.
and years later we never heard this player broady again 🙏🏿
look at all the dumb men complaining about broady. Toxic masculiity at it's best
It was the same scene when her Cinnabon got squashed.
Broady must’ve been the kind of girl that says she wasn’t ready when she loses in any game.
Lau Va 😁😁😁👍👍
Yupp
The game has rules. She is within her right to seek a penalty if she thinks there was a violation. A pro should not be reduced to okay I guess I am cool with it. The umpire should be held to enforcing the rules.
@@chevy4x466 she is within her right, but she also expresses to the whole world how pathetic she is, she knew she can't beat her opponent so she went all out to try and get her opponent disqualified.
It shows her character, and it's a poor one. Ironically is she didn't even need to do it, she could have kept her mouth shut and not interfere with the judges and the result would have still been the same, but of course her character doesn't allow her to not interfere and try to get her opponent sent off.
Would you really want to win because your opponent threw a racket? What a damn shame.
She is british thats why.. all brits are greedy af and will do whatever it takes to win
Cheers for generalising mate, no true sportsman would want to win because of this but of course since she’s British she wants to because she’s greedy. What a tosser
Exactly
Dave Olly Just another idiot with an inferior complex over the British. ignore him
She threw her racket at the ballboy so there's no denying that she should of been DQ. She didn't mean to hurt him but it's gross disrespect. That ballboy is just doing a job. He isn't being paid to be disrespected like that. That said, Broady made herself look bad by making such a big deal out of it. She should of left the decision to those responsible for making these decisions.
So concerned about the ball boy but never checked if he was ok.
I saw her check.
@@ghostdance56 Not the player in pink.
The racquet hit the tarp first, that took the sting out of it, he was never going to be badly hurt.
It was obvious he was fine.
It amuses me how many people are ranting that "she doesn't care about the ball boy."
Where does she claim she cares about the ball boy??
There are rules about throwing your racket, smashing your racket, arguing with officials etc that ALL players are subject too.
She's arguing that ostapenko has committed a racket infringement, that is really serious, because it ended up hitting a ball boy.
Do I think she should have argued about it so much and got distracted and emotional about it? No, she shouldn't have. But all this straw man bullshit that she's supposedly "pretending to care" about the ball boy is nonsense.
That racket throw hurt my feelings. Give me the match.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
How she inserts herself into a conflict she has nothing to do with. Good luck future husband and mother-in-law.
Hahaha...so true
hahahah these comments are gold
Not really, She has a vested interest in seeing Ostapneko get disqualified.
epic dude. haha
Hahahah.. Very very true...
We never did actually see if the racket hit the ballboy.
It didn't hit him directly, thankfully, from what I can see. But it did ricochet off the wall and onto him a little bit.
Looks like it grazed him
Of course simps like you would defend her
@@hashimhussain5566 She was angry. She threw her racquet. But not at the ballboy.
No one cares about the ballboy.
She's trying to get Ostapenko fired. She should get an Oscar for that performance.
I def know they are gonna have a movie in the works! Called the racket
Fired from what exactly?
@@eaglewinnings8003 Just a jokey term mate, don't read too much into it.
Did you see what happened to Djokovic? He unintentionally kicked a ball and accidentally hit the lines woman, gets defaulted. It didn't slip her hand, she threw it out of frustration. Accidentally hits a ball boy. She should have been defaulted.
Yeah yeah look what happened with djokovici and he just hit a ball slowly that accidentaly hit the line refere... ostapenko is realy stupid if that raket hit the ballboy in the eye he can remain blind...
Broady was a disgrace here. What a cowardly way to try and win a match.
Broadway should explore the situation fully
I assume she was genuinely concerned . Your assumption doesn't make sense
Nope she was absolutely correct
@@JohnSmith-ki2hlHow? Her entire breakdown was about trying to get her opponent in as much trouble as possible so she could get a cheap win. She had no care whatsoever as to whether the ball boy was OK.
Broady did poor at Wimbledon. Out in first round of qualifiers. Out in first round of doubles. Out in first round of mixed. Goes out first round of most things she enters to be honest
It doesn't matter. Rules don't only apply for the top players. All those non top players are still fighting for rank and in turn sponsorship and media coverage. The other player threw - or released - her racket and it struck a ballboy in the shoulder. There should have been a penalty for that and not just a warning. Both of them look like Karens to me but Broady was right. They official went too easy on her. Other players in tennis did the exact same and were DQ'd, but she didn't even lose a point.
@@jcasetnl only question is who gives a fuck?! I just watched Sinner v Kyrgios in Miami, Sinner just went on with his business while Kyrgios went bat shit crazy. That’s a true champion right there, not someone who whines about how their opponent didn’t get disqualified. And from her record, it seems pretty obvious she did that to get a easy win
@@jcasetnl I'm not sure why you responded with this.
He didn't say anything about Osta or her not deserving a DQ.
Broady should keep her mouth shut. It's between ostapenko, the ball boy and the umpire
+Mick Rumping And if it were not for Broady, nothing would have happened to Ostapenko, meaning the rule that the tennis federation put in place meant NOTHING. When you see something wrong, you speak up!! That's how change is made and how progress is made. You DON'T look the other way...!
+dinh Broady didnt care about the ballboy's welfare. She only cared about weaseling her way into get the other girl disqualified.
***** It's trivial because rules are made for a reason. You can't just ignore it.
No one ignored rules. Ostapenko was penalized. This issue here is Broady's ugly, self-serving, self-righteous and dishonourable behaviour. Broady is disgraceful here. No class whatsoever.
+Mick Rumping you are completely right!! so many people ignore that
I'll take "People who win and still look like the loser in the end" for $500, Alex.
Hahahaha
That's great
Who is Broady?
MEAN DA BUSH she was the one wearing pink
You win!
Doesn't matter if the racket throw was intentional or not, Brody does not care about what happens. She was emotional and just wanted anything she can get to win the match. Ostapenko gave her the two points she needed so she can celebrate a very rare win.
Who cares it's an accident. He's a boy , he's fine.
Boys don't need to be made sure we're ok from mama
@@jamesc8709 rules are rules simple as she should have been disqualified otherwise you open the gate for every player to claim it was an accident when they throw their racket or hit the ball in aggression in someones direction
@@jamesc8709eat shyt
@@jamesc8709seriously..eat shyt
Legend has it the ballboy has since been adopted by Brody
erik g. Can u imagine mommy broady if ballboy forgets to take out the trash?
@@chadcunningham9240 The tears! Knocking on neighbors' door to tell of ballboy's treachery!
@@chadcunningham9240 brody’s face is going purple, welling up with tears😂
Huh? Adopted by Russell Westbrook?
You win the comments.
Neither of them care about the ball boy. They’re just fighting for their own interests.
Ostapenko asked if he was okay, you can see it in the slow motion
The ball boy was fine.
@@beardan76 not surprisingly, it was barely a throw she just sorta let it go
As it should be.
@@tsfbaf303 she purposely threw it tho. Both were wrong tho imo
It's disgusting how she tried to squeeze something out of this that would be advantageous to her in some way. Those fake tears were not for the ball boy - she couldn't care less about the boy. Instead, she was angry she didn't get her opponent punished. Absolutely horrible behavior.
She was playing to the rules. Upholdiing the rules in the sport is not bad behaviour.
@@beardan76 What the fuck are you talking about? What freaking rules? She tried to use an unfortunate event that hurt a ball boy to get an undeserved advantage in the game. She cried fake tears and displayed incredibly sportsmanlike behavior. Don't even try to defend her behavior.
@@darkaquatus auto DQ
@@beardan76 Exactly, how pathetic is that. Faking tears and putting up an entire act just to avoid having to compete with someone you apparently deem a superior player. Trying to cheat your way through. That's pretty much the definition of unsportsmanlike behavior. It's like a soccer player trying to get a penalty by dropping to the ground as soon as one of the opponents even touches him. Absolutely horrible.
Just keep women out of sport too emotional and they’re useless players anyway. Just put them up against men
The worst part is neither player doesn't care if the ball boy was okay
it wasn't accidental but she didn't appear to be aiming for the ball-boy
+croydonrudeness Why would she?
+Rajeev Shrivastava exactly, but the way the media span the story was that she had somehow clearly targeted the ball-boy which it's obvious from the footage she did not.
+anmarks92 I agree, it's the portrayal of the incident which I objected to.
+croydonrudeness I agree she did not target the ball boy - but that was a very hard throw and she did it in a fit of anger and frustration. It showed reckless disregard for other people in the area. She's lucky that racquet did not hit the ball boy or worse yet fly over the wall and clobber a spectator. If that had happened I believe she would have been disqualified and justly sanctioned by the ITF
+croydonrudeness I doesn't matter what her intent was. She did NOT need to throw her racket, but if you hit someone you CAN be disqualified.
Broady really comes across badly here. I didn't know her before and I'd be happy to never hear about her again.
I agree. Normally, no player wants to win by default. To fight that hard for it is not a good look.
You think she cares whether you want to know about her or not. No one gives a shit about you mate. Hate to break it to you.
@@anti-tankartur677 He is just giving his opinion and tbh I don't think your any more relevant than he is.
no.
@@anti-tankartur677 and nobody cares what you think so stfu
When I saw the title I thought Ostapenko would be “the bad guy”
She is
U mean bad girl? 😂
She is
huh????
She is a liar and a bully
She should be disqualified for interfering with the umpire's decision. Poor sportsmanship!
Ostapenko clearly wasn't even looking in the direction of the ball boy..
What has that got to do with the deliberate throwing of her racket?
@@sailorman8668 it means that, just as if she hit the ball blindly in frustration and the ball went into the stands and hit someone. That's what u call an ACCIDENT.
@@1deonlucas9 If a player hits a ball into the stands full of people, why would it be surprising that a spectator would bet hit?
The same with a thrown racket.
There are dozens of people who are standing/sitting courtside - why would it be surprising if someone got hit by a thrown racket?
In fact, we shouldn't be surprised at all, as someone WAS hit by the thrown racket.
It's almost as if you don't think the player should have received any censure/penalty at all, for their reckless actions?
@@sailorman8668 I see your point. It's just that it seems obvious that it's not intentional. It's all about intent. The player hits a ball blindly out of frustration. You think the player is thinking "let me hit someone"? My point is that it was an accidental incident and not a big deal.
@@1deonlucas9 Indeed, the racket wasn't specifically thrown at the ballboy, but nevertheless, the racket was deliberately thrown, which should incur a default point for racket abuse, at the least. The reaction of the other player was ridiculous. Anybody would think that she was the one who was hit by the racket, lol.
Nobody:
Broady: sHE tHreW hEr raQuET aT tHe BaLlBoy
She said it was an accident
@@DrummerJacob Dunno he does but it worked
@Sparka J fact
I do hate the "Nobody:" jokes a LOT!
@@youtubecommentpolice2043 So were other times when a player is disqualified. The wrong decision was made.
Pathetic behavior and full of Drama by Broady.
You have nothing to say about the player who threw her racket?
@@DrummerJacob Why do YOU give a fuck about why I asked a question?
It seems YOUR life is the one that is 'empty', lol.
Sailor Man who cares she threw it out of frustration not out of rage or anger at another.
@@weston9106 The rule is that if you throw a racket and it strikes someone, you are disqualified regardless of intent. The umpire erred by not enforcing that rule.
This was officially the last time on tour that Ostapenko was the one being trolled.
Damn who are these bags giving women in tennis a bad rep? When Djok hit the line judge on accident, he immediately checked on them, apologized, respectfully listened to the official, and walked off.
Yeah her hand in the air was a sign that she's an uncaring POS. Her reaction should have been running to him to make sure he was ok.
And Nole got disqualified but she didn't?? Where's the logic. She literally threw a whole RACKET on a ball boy and did not even care or ask if they were okay. While Nole hit one with a ball by accident and checked on them and everything, but still got disqualified 😐
@@grantmalone probably cause of the lack of sportsmanship? Could have been a lot worse and that woman that got hit ended up fine... What logic are you struggling with?
@@grantmalone What do you mean lol? Umpires literally give point penalties for unsportsmanlike conduct(i.e smashing racquets) all the time? Which, in reality, harms no one but the players' pockets. Do you watch tennis?
"The woman ended up fine, the boy was fine throughout. " So why was the latter disqualified? Both were fine regardless. I'm actually struggling to understand your logic here
@@grantmalone And what exactly is the point of your previous post smartarse? Aren't you implying that the Djokovic situation is justified? Or you just making a "nothing" statement?
"Badly hurt" she recovered in a few minutes, or like you said "ended up fine"...You realise enabling bad behaviour, regardless of what happened can lead to consequences in the future? And you didn't even take in what I wrote about umpires cause you're clearly a vain individual. I can see why you lurk here to insult people cause there's no way you can have conversation with other people. No, you can't help - you can barely help yourself. I'm out, peace
Who is here after what happened to Djokovic in the US Open?
Me.
Me too and Broady was right!
Legit searched this video because of the Djokovic drama
With Đoković "it`s the rules", here they barely gave the code violation warning. Consistency. :)
Me 🙋🏻♂️
Not defending Ostapenko but Broady's behaviour here is probably the most pathetic thing I've ever seen on a tennis court. And I've watched probably around a thousand games by this point.
***** I'm talking about players and their behaviour. The Seles incident is a completely different thing.
***** As I said, I was referring to the behaviour of players, and not to some knife stabbing maniac.
"Pathetic" is not the first thing that comes to mind when I think about the Seles incident either btw, "terrifying" is more suitable. Now go troll elsewhere, I'm done feeding you.
agree robin, disgraceful and childish behaviour, crying and trying to get opponent disqualified. have zero respect for Broady
Well, I wouldn't say most pathetic seen I've seen on a tennis court, but certainly on that court. The way she BEGGED for help with the match by attempting to manipulate the situation should have gotten HER a misconduct penalty.
So she is being criticized for wanting the rules enforced. Are you serious?
What about actually going up to the ballboy and making sure he's okay and sincerely apologizing rather than doing that half-hearted hand gesture thing that tennis players love to do.
Good question.
One year on...Ostapenko Ranked No.7, Broady Ranked No.132. This probably will be her most famous moment of her career. Sad.
Who cares, ostapenko will never win any GS either.
Thad Meister
Ostapenko won Roland Garros.....
Thad Meister idiot
Really, who cares about Ostapenco? Spoiled and selfish. What can you expect?
A one HIT WONDER.
Broady's not complaining because she's concerned about the health of ball boys, she just wants an easy win by getting Ostapenko DQ'd
nah she was correct. Novak got removed from the game for that type of incident
@@CDogBeast1992 and we all knew novak’s was really accidental and still he got DQed. Ostapenko should have gotten DQed. So fitting cause DQ also means Drama Queen
Lay off it was literally the one of the biggest matches of her career its tough for these players
Either way she was in the right
Broady won anyway and it's a clear disqualification.
did the Ballboy die?
Right
No, but he is in a nursing home now eating from a tube. He actually thinks his name is Mary.
No, but he won't have kids.
The ballboy actually lost his male genitals and male identity. The ballboy is actually the best women tennis player in the world now.
paul lespage That made me laugh! In fact it almost made me do a little bit of wee in my pants 😊. It's comments like that which make RUclips all the more worthwhile 😁
I think she should have been disqualified, rackets are heavy and can seriously hurt a person. Professionalism at all times on the courts. Many players are getting away with way too much. Keep the integrity of the game and carry yourselves as mature adults.
It's weird to see Broady who didn't commit the violation -- and who's actually winning -- being so upset over this. True champions don't beg an umpire to disqualify their opponents. They want to fight and crush them.
maybe, but if you can get a free win and get paid for it, most would take that chance.
@@sfowler1100 which is why most people aren't true champions. most people are ordinary.
She was losing when it happened, though
Even as a viewer, I'd want to see this game forfeited. It would suck buying tickets to a canceled game. But there needs to be consequences for things like this.
It's WTA what do you expect
Broady was looking for an easy way out. I never in my life saw something like this. When I first saw the video, Broady was soooo upset and protesting left and right to the umpire, I thought it was SHE who was accused of throwing her racket at the ball boy. When I realized she was petitioning the ump to DQ her opponent, I thought...."wow, shameless."
Exactly. What a f***ing selfish drama queen. It was none of her business and obviously not her call. Not to mention that it was clear that however the boy was hit, there was clearly no significant injury. Ostapenko got a code violation which was entirely appropriate. Ridiculous and pathetic for an opponent to argue for a DQ. If you wanna make those calls, then become a chair ump.
Lol and she thought crying would get what she wanted
Not an easy way out. But fairness. It could have been her and she could have been penalised heavily. Of course we wouldn’t know if that will be the case, that’s why she wants fairness.
@@CountryCowboy008 fairness? It's not fair to petition the ump to DQ your opponent for an accident.
yeah, pathetic
I think I found the Karen of tennis before Karen's had a name.
Karen's have had a name for a long time. If you ever worked in customer service/food you would know lol 😆👌
@@IsaacWolfOfficial no I'm not qualified to work there.
The Beatles Actually Karen’s have been present since the 70s as far as I can remember so probably even before that
Totally
B M-Y That’s probably true. The mindset of being a self entitled dick has always been a thing
“Teacher she said a bad word”
Who is here after Novak Djokovic got disqualified from US Open 😑
Bruhhh, obviously the FBI, coupled with the algorithm, is going to bring all of 2020 here
Meee
Yes watching this video makes it ridiculous that Djokovic got disqualified.
Quentin Quentin two big difference. It looked like the racquet barely missed the ball boy. And secondly this was during the point.
@@gozer825 the racket hit the wall and then the ball boy. this girl fired the racket in anger. djokovic did not hit the ball in anger, he was just getting rid of the ball and hit it to a bad place. the difference is just the reaction of the individual hit.
She did let the racquet go but she wasnt throwing it wanting to hit the ballboy! Broady won the point what the hell does she want? Why is she complaining!? I mean it wasnt right obviusly but you are not the one who has to complain!
+Raul Cercea she was trying to get the umpire to see that it wasn't an accident as the umpire wasn't go to punish Ostapenko for trowing the racquet. i know she wasn't aiming for the ballboy but still she shouldn't have thrown it and good on Naomi for stepping up for that ballboy who did get hit because that girl shouldn't have thrown the racquet so i agree with Naomi the girl needed to be penalised for it
+Jordan francis She clearly wasn't concerned about the ballboy's welfare. Her entire rant was about getting the other girl disqualified. Broady was shameful and dishonourable.
For example a few years ago a player was suspended for months because they hit a lines person with a ball. It wasn't intentional but it still happened and the player was punished.
Shane Terry you're making up stories. Send a link with your sources, idiot.
+00 00 www.inquisitr.com/887585/olga-puchkova-defaulted-after-hitting-line-judge-with-ball/ why would I make shit up? Idiot
This was the high point of Brody’s career. Sad but true
Do you know Matt Brody?
Hilarious. With a 2-10 slam singles record, she could use all the help she can get from her opponent
So pathetically high schoolish of her trying to get Ostapenko in trouble!
Haha so true!
To me Broady is the one to be negative here. Her try to convince the umpire Ostapenko intentionally hit the ball boy is pathetic, it's not her job to decide. She is so miserable.
I remember a men's match. The player threw his racquet at a CURTAIN. It hit about 5-6 feet from a line umpire. It continued and hit her at like 2 mph. She folded like a deck chair and insisted on medical help. She was in her 60s and should have been in a rest home.
Ostapenko deliberatly left last two serves i guess. She just let go off the match.
omg... she didn't mean to. The opponent is a twat for making such a fuss over it. She obviously wanted her punished to gain an advantage in the match.
exactly. Why is this relevant to the girl in pink AT ALL?
She always complains in her matches, shes weak minded if you ask me, always seeking easy wins over others.
exactly... I'm suprised the umpire didn't say to her get a grip women... or maybe he did
Doesn't matter the intent. Tim Henman was disqualified at Wimbledon when he unintentionally hit a ball kid with the ball after losing the point.
If the racquet had actually hit the ball boy, I would agree that she should be penalized, but it didn't.
And where is broady now?? Working as a part-time tennis commentator and slaving away in ITF events and qualies of second-tier WTA events, while Ostapenko is in top 20 and has won a grandslam already? 🤭🤫🤣
Let me ask you something. Does e every engineer become the CEO of a company? No. Does every musician becomes world renowned? No. There are always players better than you but the main thing in a sport or in life is to survive. Broady is still surviving and it's going pretty well for her.
Grudo Yugin I like your insight and wisdom ... thanks for that !
So!! It does'nt give her the right to throw her racquet at the ballboy!
Willy Severus Dude, you’re wallowing in a causal fallacy like a toddler playing in his own shit. Ostapenko’s later tour success is not the result of her being the sort of twat who’d chuck a racquet at a ball boy and then lie about it.
@@nickadams1992 I don't think he is even saying that. It seems more generous to interpret him as taking joy in the irony.
I love all the ways the captions misspell Ostapenko
Wow. Who would have thought you could make two women seem so unlikable in seven and a half minutes.
*8
On my job it's easy. Speak with a UK accent.
especially the one in pink. What a bitch!
I know, it usually takes a lot less time than that.
This girl said "Omfg you're so fatt!! Ughh" and I already hated her in 3 sec.
Imagine crying about something that doesn’t involve you at all, broady was just trying to get an easy end to the game
That's why I was so confused. I thought she threw the racket and she was worried about the ball guy. It's nonsense
Of course it involved her.
@@beardan76 barely....
Doesn't involve her? Are you dumb or just stoopid? THEY ARE PLAYING AGAINST EACH OTHER....BELIEVE ME TARDLING....SHE IS INVOLVED
I can’t bear fake emotions...feel like slapping that red top player....if u really cared then u wud have asked that ball boy if he is ok...but no..u r making a mountain of an ant hill...shameful
I wanted to slap that silly bitch to smithereens, too. What a stupid and OTT display of emotions. If you watch this half way (after the racket had been thrown) and only when Broady is talking to the referee, you may think that something have gone really wrong and she is incredibly upset over it.
The racket was thrown on purpose, but not aimed at ball boy on purpose. A penalty was certainly in order for throwing racket, but entirely up to umpire. Brody's behavior after was a disgrace.
I find it amusing how people seem to be able to read minds...
@@dorian763 I stand corrected, she intended to throw the racket at the ground once she saw she couldn't reach that ball, but changed her mind and tried to stop herself in the very last millisecond, which caused her to lose the grip and even miss the ground. Brody's behavior was still a disgrace. What a terrible person.
@@bjornlangoren3002 bad observation
@@bjornlangoren3002 even if she wanted to throw it on purpose calling a person terrible because of that is just miserable... You are the only disgrace here
@@dorian763 do you understand names? The person I called Terrible was Brody. You know, the one who demonstrably interjected herself to lobby for disqualification, when it had absolutely nothing to do with her. There is no mind reading involved in that. She used words so we could hear what she said.
Are you drunk, or just a bit slow?
If Broady would have lost in the end, this would be the best video on youtube.
Broady: Hell with the ball boy.. Lemme see if I can make anything outta it
Ostapenko is now a slam champion I'm not quite sure where broady is
Still bitching about not getting penalty
Djokovic was DQ'd for hitting a ball. Anyone in the men's would be DQ'd for throwing their racket like this and they know it.
Anyone who says the women are treated unfairly need to watch this.
I was sure Broady was about to start stamping her feet and fake crying.
As opposed to throwing a temper tantrum like a child and throwing your racket?
Look I’m a Brit and I always want our sportsmen and women to do well but I seriously haven’t a clue what Broady is playing at here.
It’s an accident, you won the point - get on with the bloody game
mts ts exactly, just leave that kind of play to footballers 😂
Exactly. She's a bloody disgrace, and sorry but comes across to us down under as the stereotypical " whinging Pom"
Ostapenko deliberately threw her racket and hit a ball boy with her racket. That is an instant DQ every time.
It’s a blatant dq you stupid morons
@@danielperez-gonzalez877 right? How do these part-time fans not get this?
Legend has it Broady is still sticking up for the ball boy
At the playground
Name Watcher charissecoal is being sarcastic ... no need for you to call the person names
She had his baby and he threw a baseball bat at her.. 🍼🚼🚼🍼🍼🍼🚼🚼🚼🚼🚼🚼🚼🎾🎾🎾👶👶👶
I wouldn't say it was "sticking up" but more taking advantage tbh
I bet she banged him
The throw was intentional out of frustration, but the hit was accidental. She wasn't even looking at the ballboy so there was no intent to hit him, she just miscalculated where the racket landed.
On the otherhand, Broady should be penalized for unsportmanslike conduct, she wasn't concerned about the ballboy at all, she just wanted her opponent to get disqualified for an easy win. How lame.
She clearly did not throw it AT the ballboy. Yes, she threw it intentionally but her head was down and she didn't see him standing there. It hit him accidentally. She waved to him immediately indicating it was an accident.
Negligence is still negligence and she didn't see him standing there? You mean the boy that was standing there the whole match?
What’s the difference? She was recklessly negligent. She threw it at an area she she knew had people in it.
The point is she shouldn't throw it in first place are you thick
Brody has never got past the second round of a slam.
Who’s here after Djoković got DQ’d? Gotta love the “consistency”.
RUclips recommendations r a masterpiece
SFO14.... after watching this Djokovic got F’d over BIG TIME!
@Stuart Webb You're right, Aljaž Bedene hitting the cameraman in Cincy less than two weeks ago is a better comparison -- and Bedene didn't get DQ'd.
Djokovic hit her in the neck and took her out, he deserved to get dq’ed even though it was unfortunate
@@brettcarter5142 dude she threw a damn racquet
Djoko has been disqualified for less
good god it's so obvious she wasn't intentionally trying to peg the ball boy w the racket
Broady wins the match and still feels the need to go after Ostapenko? Man smh she may have won the match but certainly lost some fans from this.
Probably cause after hitting the ball boy she then lied about it.
@@paulatling8844 Did she? You can read her mind and know her intentions? You should travel with a circus!
My friend Helen...never let's things go once she feels justified to hate. It must be some kind of ego demon.
Broady is not the umpire!
And why she cries the whole time?!?
Because she wants Osta disqualified and win by default. Not the best mentality
She was sad for the injured ballboy
I'm sorry but none of you know tennis. I'm a huge Ostapenko fan but homegirl threw the racquet and should have at least got a point penalty.
Ostapenko won the French AFTER this match the following year. I'd say somebody got the last laugh.
That’s the ultimate revenge lmaoooo
Thats not the point. There are rules in the game. If you throw you raquet intentionally and it unluckily hits someone you should be disqualified.
Main thing is she got the balls and eventually won THAT game. End of the story.
@@adil8701 1) That wasn't a game... it was a tiebreaker. 2) she didn't win it, she lost it, and the match. 3) Yes, she should be dq'd, but it is NOT Brody's job to cry about it to the umpire. To me it was clear that she didn't mean to hit him, but that means nothing, just like with Joker. She shouldn't have been that frustrated to swing her racquet like that, let alone let it slip from her hands. FYI I've lost my racquet on a serve many times due to sweat... just saying.. it happens. To me it didn't look like she even meant to throw it, she was just swinging at air in frustration and lost the grip, but that is STILL her fault. She let her emotions get the best of her, and she showed little remorse.
@@basedbear1605 i was talking about broady when i said that "she won the game"
For the rest i understand your opinion but then according to you player should just follow umpires décisions and never challenge. But it is accepted to challenge for balls touching or not lines or the net so why not for severe violations like that ?
@@adil8701 You hallucinate. You literally just made up a straw man argument, assuming my position and putting words into my mouth. You conflate a SUBJECTIVE call (was the throwing of the racquet intentional or not - that is 100% the ref's opinion/ruling) with balls touching the line, which is OBJECTIVE and easily proven with a replay. Wanna try again?
Oh, and when you use a pronoun in response to the OP, it's inferred that you're talking about the subject that the OP used in his sentence... which was Ostapenko. So yeah, work on your writing skills.
Broa is a little cry baby. The racket wasnt even close. Still she shouldnt have thrown it but to start crying and asking for a disqualification shows she isnt a true sports competitor.
+Omar Beydoun lol who the fuck are you. And where are you?
+Omar Beydoun ya The loser is you for not letting him express his opinion
Lol at calling Broady "Broa"...
+Colt Ryley true and lets not mention all the strange insults that clearly shows he is not a tennis fan.
“Id like to speak to the manager please!!”
"I would like the rules enforced please!"
5:52 Broady went Karen-mode 😂
Making a Racquet over nothing
lol
Lol! Nice
Oh thanks toronto
Nice one-love.
Ahhh Eddie, bloody NICE once!!! VERY bloody nice!
Ok why was this recommended, its like watching paint dry.
Same
Actually I've watched paint dry the past two days and enjoyed it immensely. I plan to do it again tomorrow
I agree..just keep playing ...you can tell it wasn't meant to hurt anyone !
efcpl I agree. Taupe paint. If I wasn't drunk and had anything else going for me in life,I would have just looked at something else.
It's like watching sports- and to the above.. I'm also slightly drunk and have little going on.
Broady is classless, so unsportsmanlike of her. Sure, it wasn't accidental but Ostapenko definitely did not meant to hit the ball boy, she was aiming for the ball.
RUclips algorithm seems to think I like bad behavior in tennis for some reason.
You know your career is insignificant when this is the first time people have heard of you. From a racket incident.
Yeah, its the first time I hear about ostapenko
@@teseu1763This is the first time I've heard of Broady.
@@teseu1763she won the French open.........tf yall talking about
First time I heard about John McEnroe was cuz of his gross unprofessionalism. And he's a legend lmao
Why the fuck does Broady care what the fuck happens, what a poor excuse of a human being. She is just trying to jump on any opportunity she gets... She nearly started crying as well ;D
Well duh. Welcome to the world of sports. You get any advantage you can get.
HilzGaming she won anyway so fuck off.
she stinks
@@ElOcampo1apparently some think others shouldn’t have rules enforced. Broadside did nothing wrong.
My assessment: PINK was the total loser. PURPLE lost a point and out of frustration, she accidentally let go of her racket, which flew over towards the ball boy. (PURPLE's eyes weren't even on the ball boy.) But PINK sensed she could capitalize on this opportunity and have her opponent disqualified. And if not that, distract her opponent so badly as PINK was about to serve. if there was any unsportsmanlike behavior displayed here, it was from PINK.
my conclusion: Pink was a total twat
+Garo Arslanian I like pink twat 😊
Tress... precisely. you saved me from having to write the exact same thing! lol!
Tress Braga yeah but pink won anyway so choke on it.
while pink is struggling in qialifications, purple has won a GS down 4-6 0-3 hands down
Ostapenko did wave an apology to the ball boy. She lost her cool and immediately apologized. I don't see a problem with her. Broady is the problem here.
I admire the interviewer's professionalism at the end of the Match. He did not make a mention of the Ball Boy incident and kept what is relevant in the match. A lot of interviewers would have milked that incident for sensationalism.
SPIRIT DOT She did not throw it directly at the ball boy. She did throw the racket but did not aim it at the ball boy. I think at her level of play and physical control of the racket, had she intended to hit, she would have hit him. I agree it's was unsportsmanlike conduct and she was penalized by receiving a code violation. That was settled in the match as the ball boy was not hit and not a actual offense to disqualify someone. Unless it was a repeat offense. Her opponent made it abundantly clear how she felt about it during the match.
Not really relevant to the match an no reason to bring it into the interview. Btw calling someone an. " Asshole " just because you disagree with them does not sound like proper protocol, on the subject of sportsmanship but if that is the way you want to conduct yourself.
carrychris2010 I admire your discretion by not telling mother I hadn't been cleaning the motel because I was watching the tennis: Thankyou 😈😉
Norman Bates your secret is safe with me. 😉
it's why you are here
carrychris2010 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
And now Ostapenko is RG champion while you can remember Broady for this. Cute
Yeah well.. its july 2018 - Ostapenko is #11 in the world and was just in the semi's of Wimbledon.. and Naomi Broady... #139... Karma for sure!!
naomi broadi the typical English character
OMG, I identify with your comment wholeheartedly, and what do ya know....66 likes to this comment (as I see it). I've been seeing that number pop up so much lately on meaningful things to me. It's eerie.
amisgohome, replace "English" with "black". In what way is your comment less racist?
@@bigglesworthof266 English isn't a race
If the comment said "white people" then maybe it would be racist
Also add a French open title in ostapenko’s resume
As a tennis player, I am not sure why she even swung the racket, the ball was way out of reach. Seems like she got frustrated and threw the racket.
Broady's current ranking, 88th
Ostapenko's current ranking, 11th
Complain now, Broady.
Rules should apply equally to everyone. She should have been disqualified, if it was a line umpire or someone in the crowd she would have, instead it was a ball boy
exactly. novak got hanged for that type of incident so she should have been removed from the game as well.
@@CDogBeast1992 It was apparently because he hit the ball away out of anger, rather than what here looks like giving up/the racket slipping instead.
17 is considered a grown man in NZ.
It was literally an accident
Neither deserved to be DQed.
She threw her racket but not 'at' the ball boy, stupid and deserved a caution but I'm not sure it even did hit anyone. Poor form from the Brit though, no need to get involved.
A lot about nothing really.
First Broady throws her racket at the ball boy and then at 1:29 we get hit with a tennis ball, what a scandalous match
Nice one 😂underrated
Imagine how different the situation would be if it was: roger Federer throws racquet at ball girl
And not even check if she was okay 😂
Broady is such a crybaby lmao
Cry baby!
She was right. Sorry not sorry.
She was right, it's not just about her the lines people should not be treated like cannon fodder
@@paulatling8844 Accident bro, not cannon fodder, lol. Broady showed she's a real jerk.
@@roybaty7439 check the rules just because you are a top ranked player doesn't mean it's OK to randomly throw your racket around with any thought of the little people, yes the crying was over the top but I respect her sense of fair play. The umpires are there to apply the rules not show favoritism
Broady: "You're gonna see on the video this is going to be so bad"
Ostapenko: Look who's talking
6 years later and Ostapenko is a grand slam winner and has won many big titles while the other one is nowhere to be seen .
But still she threw the racket intentionally……it was so wrong, and she should have been called out for that by the umpire
What other many big titles has Ostapenko won besides the French open you`re speaking of ?
@@Richardtv1968 Ostapenko threw her racket intentionally but she wasn`t aiming for the ball boy.