This video is fantastic! The detailed instructions and clear visuals make it so easy to follow along. I've been looking for a simple and effective way to test LEDs and diodes, and this DIY solution is perfect. The step-by-step guide is thorough and leaves no room for confusion. Thanks for sharing such valuable information. Keep up the great work, and I can't wait to see more of your projects!
Все гениальное просто! Сначала не поверил, потом посчитал и понял, что ничего лучшего уже не придумаешь. С удовольствием пользуюсь и каждый раз благодарю автора. Всего Вам доброго!!!
Se encenderán más débilmente si pones las mismas. Este suministra una corriente media de alrededor de los 10-12 mA a 230 V porque lleva dos resistencias de 10k (20k efectivos). Si es para 120 te generará alrededor de 5 mA. Si quieres puedes poner dos resistencias de 4k7 o 5k6 para hacerlo similar.
سيدي المحترم لكم تحياتي وتقديري على مجهودكم وفيديوهاتكم القيمة التي استفدنا منها الكثير اسأل ألله عزوجل أن يحفظكم واسرتكم المحترمة من جميع شر خلقه وفقكم الله وسدد خطاكم دمتم في عز الله وأمنه ورعايته والسلام ختام
@@Simple.E.P anytime man, but i got shocked when i touch + or - so "White in your description about this warning" and let your viewers know about this danger.
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
Thank you very much and a very important question, if you also measure the voltage of the diodes that light up, will the tester show the correct voltage of the diode, for example, three volts for white, for red - 2 V, for the diode assembly 30-40 V and so on?
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage [for 220VAC mains] at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae could damage a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
@@umitylmaz3123 It is better not to do it. This circuit is designed only for LED testing and does not have enough resistance for all DC devices, therefore there is a possibility of damaging the circuit. You are doing a good job of asking questions before doing something you are not sure about
@@Simple.E.P Thank you very much, I thought it would make all the DC circuits work, thank you very much again, otherwise my circuits would be damaged, thank you again, have a good day
@@Simple.E.P Thank you very much, I thought it would make all the DC circuits work, thank you very much again, otherwise my circuits would be damaged, thank you again, have a good day
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage [for 220VAC mains] at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae could damage a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
Thank you for your attention to the quality of the video Yes, the video camera unfortunately burned down and I had to buy a camera with a higher quality
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage [for 220VAC mains] at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae could damage a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
@@kennmossman8701 While I generally agree that this contraption is just horrible, I have questions on details. Since the resistors are in series, shouldn't that divide the voltage?
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
INTERESANTE......CREO.......,YO HICE UN PROBADOR DE CONTINUIDAD CASERO CON UN CARGADOR DE CELULAR VIEJO DE 5 VOLTIOS, UN LED Y UNA RESISTENCIA DE 100 ohms, Y CÓMO PUNTAS UN PEDACITO DE COBRE DEL GROSOR DE LA MINA DE UN LÁPIZ Y ME FUNCIONA MUY BIEN SIN RIESGO NI PELIGRO ALGUNO.
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
Bom dia abençoado por Deus a todos voceis. Está invenção sua e para qto de entrada AC 110volts ou 220 volts. Agradeço se puder corresponder cominfo. Obrigado. Júlio Cesar- BRASIL.
Noooo! Usa los mismos valores de 10k. Los LED se encenderan mas debiles. Las luces LED se encienden hasta con las puntas del MULTIMETRO en "Diode Mode.'" Observando la polaridad. Yo vivo en USA (120V AC) Yo no usaria este metodo, lo veo muy peligroso, yo pruebo y reparo LED Lights con mi multimetro. de una en una. -------Thanks for the video SEP!--------
such a bad idea and construction and some ill-informed comments First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible. The voltage [for 220VAC mains] at the probes is over 300VDC VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense. While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae could damage a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
Do not do this. I do not accept responsibility for your health If you like, I will make a tester without electric shock and upload it next week I like this because it will not be life threatening
@@SutyadiSut Jangan lakukan ini. Saya tidak bertanggung jawab atas kesehatan Anda Jika Anda suka, saya akan membuat alat uji tanpa sengatan listrik dan mengunggahnya minggu depan
@@vijaymhatre2676 Because you can die. The resistors are 10K/0.25W. If you short circuit the resistors get too much power and can damage (in this video at 4:53) P = 230V*230V / 20000 Ohm = 2.645 Watt 2.645 more than 0.25. Nobody guarrantees the resistors no lose them value. If the circuit shorted and you contact pins you can get more than 20-30milliampers and you will be died. If you do not know and do not understand safety regulations and sources of danger you do not use 230V (or more than 40V Voltage) The idea is good, but you should use less than 40V instead of 230V. For example an 18V accu is good for this.
@@fulgen Yes, 2.65W divided in two. But it is 2.65/0.5= 503% overload. And if you short the phase wire with a grounded case of other device P = 230V*230V/10000 Ohm = 5.29 Watt on only one resistor. The point is that the electricity is dangerous. More than 40V can cause damage. If somebody use 230V (100-250V) the safety regulations must be followed. I'm sure there is no country where this is allowed
My dear friend, there is no danger if you follow the warnings. This circuit is for testing LEDs, which will take you a few seconds at most. If you only use it for testing, don't worry, there is no danger to you.
OUTPUT Dari Arus Rangkaian Dioda Yang Keluar Bukannya Sudah Berubah Dari ACv Ke DCv 🤔🤔🤔 Tapi Apakah Masih Ada Tegangan Yang Bisa Menyebabkan Insiden Bahaya Untuk Manusia 👀👀👀
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
This video is fantastic! The detailed instructions and clear visuals make it so easy to follow along. I've been looking for a simple and effective way to test LEDs and diodes, and this DIY solution is perfect. The step-by-step guide is thorough and leaves no room for confusion. Thanks for sharing such valuable information. Keep up the great work, and I can't wait to see more of your projects!
Thanks❤
Thanks.....😊
Все гениальное просто! Сначала не поверил, потом посчитал и понял, что ничего лучшего уже не придумаешь. С удовольствием пользуюсь и каждый раз благодарю автора. Всего Вам доброго!!!
很危险的事情，不是专业电工更不要跟随，一不小心可能会做成触电或其他事故！
Una pregunta…para corriente 120 ca …cambiaria su resistencia?.. pregunto
Se encenderán más débilmente si pones las mismas. Este suministra una corriente media de alrededor de los 10-12 mA a 230 V porque lleva dos resistencias de 10k (20k efectivos). Si es para 120 te generará alrededor de 5 mA. Si quieres puedes poner dos resistencias de 4k7 o 5k6 para hacerlo similar.
Use the same values for 120 volts
Excelente video, saludos
Kabelnya nyetrum nggak?
Better we can use Power Supply or adaptor multi
سيدي المحترم لكم تحياتي وتقديري على مجهودكم وفيديوهاتكم القيمة التي استفدنا منها الكثير اسأل ألله عزوجل أن يحفظكم واسرتكم المحترمة من جميع شر خلقه وفقكم الله وسدد خطاكم دمتم في عز الله وأمنه ورعايته والسلام ختام
شكرا لك صديقي العزيز
Saludos desde Venezuela excelente video muy buena su explicación
❤
❤
داش قطعات که استفاده کردی واسم بنویس برم من هم یک درست کنم اون قطعات به مار برده شده است
پراب مولتی متر -- دوشاخه برق -- دیود 4007 ، چهار عدد -- مقاومت 10 کیلواهم 1/4 وات ، دو عدد
حتما قسمت توضیحات ویدیو را ترجمه و مطالعه بفرمایید
Ты супер! Сколько я разных схем паял, все с заморочками. Сегодня собрал твою, ... Это самая простая и работоспособная, спасибо мил человек!!!
Thanks bro🌼
гальваника будь внимателен яйца не поджарь.
@@РудольфЖмурин does the professional led tester have same components along with a voltmeter ?
Bhai kon sa voltage diya AC .DC
Input:AC & Output:DC . Auto voltage
Thanks 👍
It can test many leds in series but potentially dangerous. So add a fuse for safety.
Thanks bro
Aap bahut aachha jankari di hai
Aw mannn..
This video is very good. Amazing
Thanks bro
@@Simple.E.P anytime man, but i got shocked when i touch + or - so "White in your description about this warning" and let your viewers know about this danger.
@@RandyPrinceton OK Thanks bro
Dễ hiểu và hay, đã đăng ký kênh
thanks bro
Aap ka pcb stand nahi dikha raha hai
Ma se inavvertitamente tocco i due puntali prendo la corrente?
Yes bro . ⚡Danger⚡
Ma meno di 12 mA. Fastidioso ma non pericoloso
@@fulgen It is not dangerous, but it is better to follow the warning to be sure and save life
Que legal 😂😂
جميل جدا شكرا
Nice video,thank you:)
circuit is very very simple
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
Thank you very much and a very important question, if you also measure the voltage of the diodes that light up, will the tester show the correct voltage of the diode, for example, three volts for white, for red - 2 V, for the diode assembly 30-40 V and so on?
Yes bro
@Simple.E.P Much thanks, You cool.
Nice
Xem xong đăng ký luôn.
Thank you for your tutorial Sir
Quais são os diodos usados no projeto ?
IN4007
High dc voltage? 12 volt?
High DC . Auto Voltage 0 ~ 200 v
@@Simple.E.Pis this is Sirig bord?
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage [for 220VAC mains] at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae could damage a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
Very very nice video,
🧡🌼
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
HELLO GOOD DAY, I WONDER IF IT WILL WORK ALL DC PRODUCTS, I WILL DO IT ACCORDINGLY.
Please be careful and take care of yourself
@@Simple.E.P Thank you, but I don't fully understand, is it dangerous to do this?
@@umitylmaz3123 It is better not to do it. This circuit is designed only for LED testing and does not have enough resistance for all DC devices, therefore there is a possibility of damaging the circuit. You are doing a good job of asking questions before doing something you are not sure about
@@Simple.E.P
Thank you very much, I thought it would make all the DC circuits work, thank you very much again, otherwise my circuits would be damaged, thank you again, have a good day
@@Simple.E.P
Thank you very much, I thought it would make all the DC circuits work, thank you very much again, otherwise my circuits would be damaged, thank you again, have a good day
From an electrical safety point of view, it is dangerous.
Yes
Terima kasih, sangat praktis dan mudah. Bekerja dengan sempurna tapi masih ada strom. Bagaimana hilangkan strom?
I din't notice . What do you mean by storm? What do you want to get rid of my friend?
@@Simple.E.P Maaf kawan, yang kumaksud strom adalah sengatan listrik.
@@yepidia2311 ⚡💜
Before testing output dc voltage how much appearing verify good
Hay lắm rất tuyệt vời cảm ơn bạn nhiều chúc bạn thành công trong công việc cũng như trong cuộc sống hàng ngày
Thanks bro
The best and safe is using 1 or 2 cells using led tester.
Resistor value is 10k or 1k ?
10K
Thank you.❤
brother iske volts b multimeter sy check karwate to acha hota...output kitne volte ha?
Yes, you can use a multimeter and set the multimeter to 200 volts DC
Muito bom amigo! Obrigado por compartilhar🖒 Brasil
❤
Al fin un probador que funciona. Buena idea. Gracias.
这样做太危险了，一不小心可能会触电或做成其他事故，而且灯泡故障不是经常发生，搞一个“测试器”也要时间和金钱。买一个新的灯泡花几块钱，不要因少失大，误了生命！
Ni idea tienes de lo que dices 🤦♂️ jajajaja
What is the main supply voltage?
220volt
How much volts in DC output?
Almost all input is output
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage [for 220VAC mains] at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae could damage a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
What is indicated when both the probs touched to each other?
If you connect a multimeter to show the voltage, it shows 0 voltage. Nothing special happens and it doesn't even spark.
Too good 👍
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
La corriente alterna de cuántos voltios es ? 110 o 220 V.
220v AC .and working by 110v
Is easy work.easy work I no like.i like Hard
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
😍
А чё сразу за оба щупа пальцами не взялся ? 😁
¿Para qué?
А лучше-языком.
@@АлександрПетров-ч9ц7ф сначала руками, потом языком вот и проверим безопасна ли данная сборка
@@СержСид опасна конечно
и проверять не надо
❤❤❤
Nic❤
পিন টাতে দরলে শক করবে না?
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
when u touch the prob, why is:t it shock?
Warning
Never do you do this
Kya is me coront aata hai
Mnie wystarczy multimetr do sprawdzania
The quality of the image in the middle of the video was excellent. Have you done anything special???
Thank you for your attention to the quality of the video
Yes, the video camera unfortunately burned down and I had to buy a camera with a higher quality
Source of the current kya hai
Thanks,good
You input & output voltage not clearly
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage [for 220VAC mains] at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae could damage a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
@@kennmossman8701 While I generally agree that this contraption is just horrible, I have questions on details.
Since the resistors are in series, shouldn't that divide the voltage?
@@ImieNazwiskoOK no, here the resisters only limit the current, there is noi resistor divider
Salam 220v qoşdun?
Εξερετικο πολύ καλό το κύκλωμα μπράβο 😊
ευχαριστώ αδερφέ
어제밤에 보고 오늘 아주 잘만들었는데
사진을 못올려서 아쉽네요
고상하게 생긴 어댑터에 테스터기 홀더를 삽입 필요시 테스터기 리더선을 꽂으면
사용할 수 있게 만들었어요, 감사합니다~
This is very good, I'm glad
Nice video.Thanks
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
Today make this auto volt tester it works but it can't produce full power.
eg i test 20watt light but it glow like 5watt light
This is an LED tester circuit, not an LED driver circuit
@@Simple.E.P oh but it's very useful for me thankyou lot ❤️
Very great 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
Yg di pegang kog yg min coba yg ples yg di pegang nyetrom gk bang
Yes, if you hold both ends of the probe in your hands, a little electricity will enter your body. But to protect your health, avoid touching them
If you add a votlage indicator?
You cannot connect it to the voltage indicator, but you can connect it to a multimeter to measure the voltage of the LEDs
@@Simple.E.P yes that's what i've done today. Succeeded. Thank you so much.
How to die early?!!!😂
I made it work. Thanks for sharing this useful tutorial
@@BabyTech-yc9jv Resistance Value ?
Great idea!❤
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
INTERESANTE......CREO.......,YO HICE UN PROBADOR DE CONTINUIDAD CASERO CON UN CARGADOR DE CELULAR VIEJO DE 5 VOLTIOS, UN LED Y UNA RESISTENCIA DE 100 ohms, Y CÓMO PUNTAS UN PEDACITO DE COBRE DEL GROSOR DE LA MINA DE UN LÁPIZ Y ME FUNCIONA MUY BIEN SIN RIESGO NI PELIGRO ALGUNO.
Fantastic..
Thank u sir
Fantastic
Please upload CIRCUIT DIAGRAM.
This diagram is not needed anymore, dear friend
one diode bridge and two 10k resistor؛only this
What values of components have you used??
Everything that was used in the training
@@Simple.E.P which diode is it? 1400N? What is the resistance of these resistors?
Mention proper details of the resistor and diodes
@@mahaniaz5734 Did you not notice these in the video?
Diode:1N4007 4pcs
Resistor: 10K Ohm 2pcs
@@mahaniaz5734and it's auto DC volt 1~200
excelente😊
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae coud damae a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted.. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
What is input AC voltage?
It is clear if you watch the whole video
KALO DI PEGANG KABEL NYA KONTAK GAK KITA, SERIUS TANYA
Bom dia abençoado por Deus a todos voceis. Está invenção sua e para qto de entrada AC 110volts ou 220 volts. Agradeço se puder corresponder cominfo. Obrigado. Júlio Cesar- BRASIL.
hi . 110 and 220 volt
Semplice pratico funzionale ed economico bravo
Good sir,use 56k resistance 2watts 😊
Do not change the training process. Proceed as in the tutorial
Apakah ada yg menjual alat itu.
No
Muchas gracias x compartir sin egoísmo y muy bien explicado caballero hare el mio siguiendo tus pasos amigo felicidades eres un texo
Thanks bro
Без гальванической развязки опасно. И ещё: если автор из Великобритании, то почему использует сетевую вилку такого вида?
Thank you for your attention, dear friend
I do not currently live in the UK
Para uma corrénte alternada de 127 volts colocar resistores de 47k 2w
Please do not spread false information.
thank you dear friend
Noooo! Usa los mismos valores de 10k. Los LED se encenderan mas debiles. Las luces LED se encienden hasta con las puntas del MULTIMETRO en "Diode Mode.'" Observando la polaridad. Yo vivo en USA (120V AC) Yo no usaria este metodo, lo veo muy peligroso, yo pruebo y reparo LED Lights con mi multimetro. de una en una. -------Thanks for the video SEP!--------
👍
such a bad idea and construction
and some ill-informed comments
First this is DANEROUS - it is not isolated from the Mains voltage, so a nasty shock - even a fatal shock is possible.
The voltage [for 220VAC mains] at the probes is over 300VDC
VDC-peak = VAC rms x 1.4 - Vf of diodes
That is a standard well-known equation - this guy says its 0 to 200DC which is nonsense.
While the resistors limit the current - a small current at that voltage is dangerous
Another point is that LEDs have a low reverse voltage rating so this high voltae could damage a LED. A led tester that can damage the DUT ------ not smart at all
then the construction sucks. The resistors should not be soldered directly to the prongs. And there should be better strain relief. Plus the wires need to be rated for that voltage
In conclusion a bad and even dangerous circuit that is poorly constucted. It is clear to me that this guy lacks knowledge
parabéns por este vídios tão bom , gostei muito muito ,vc é um profissional , capacitado , obrigado,
Pub stand ka video dalo
A varistor should be added to protect the circuit.
No need dear friend
Yg di pegang yg min cobak yg ples bang nyetrom gk bang
Do not do this. I do not accept responsibility for your health
If you like, I will make a tester without electric shock and upload it next week
I like this because it will not be life threatening
Tolong pake bahasa Indonesia
@@SutyadiSut Jangan lakukan ini. Saya tidak bertanggung jawab atas kesehatan Anda
Jika Anda suka, saya akan membuat alat uji tanpa sengatan listrik dan mengunggahnya minggu depan
Dangerous..do not follow!!
But Why.?
Please Explain.
@@vijaymhatre2676 Because you can die. The resistors are 10K/0.25W. If you short circuit the resistors get too much power and can damage (in this video at 4:53) P = 230V*230V / 20000 Ohm = 2.645 Watt
2.645 more than 0.25.
Nobody guarrantees the resistors no lose them value. If the circuit shorted and you contact pins you can get more than 20-30milliampers and you will be died.
If you do not know and do not understand safety regulations and sources of danger you do not use 230V (or more than 40V Voltage)
The idea is good, but you should use less than 40V instead of 230V. For example an 18V accu is good for this.
@@istvannagy3069 Okay.
Thanks for explaining.
@@istvannagy3069 2,65 W divided in two. Maybe, if you not used during a long time, with 1W resistors could be enought
@@fulgen Yes, 2.65W divided in two. But it is 2.65/0.5= 503% overload. And if you short the phase wire with a grounded case of other device P = 230V*230V/10000 Ohm = 5.29 Watt on only one resistor.
The point is that the electricity is dangerous. More than 40V can cause damage. If somebody use 230V (100-250V) the safety regulations must be followed.
I'm sure there is no country where this is allowed
Con las bolas del puma haciendo un llavero..😂😂😖👹👽👽
Amigo, excelente, vou tentar fazer um para mim.
Nguy hiểm quá 😢
Có 2 con điện trở 10k ohm
Nếu như thế chạm vào 2 đầu sẽ bị điện giật thì sao pro quá nguy hiểm
My dear friend, there is no danger if you follow the warnings. This circuit is for testing LEDs, which will take you a few seconds at most. If you only use it for testing, don't worry, there is no danger to you.
@@Simple.E.P nhưng nếu lỡ chạm vào 2 đầu que ấy thì có bị giật điện kg, thấy nguy hiểm quá pro ơi,thanks you
Anti social man 😂😂😂😂😂😂
OUTPUT Dari Arus Rangkaian Dioda Yang Keluar
Bukannya Sudah Berubah Dari ACv Ke DCv 🤔🤔🤔
Tapi Apakah Masih Ada Tegangan Yang Bisa
Menyebabkan Insiden Bahaya Untuk Manusia 👀👀👀
Yes, the output voltage has changed from AC to DC. There is no danger to your home wiring, but it is better for humans to follow safety precautions.
it is not better for newcommer
Yes, it is
good
¿Why only 1/4 W resistors? V^2/2R could reach 2,6 W with V=230V and R=10k
There is no need to change the parts, please continue your work as per the tutorial
Thank you, the note excelent.
This is dangerous. And high risk voltage. Dont follow this vdo and dnt try it.
😮
Qua hay
Thanks bro