Ukraine-Russia Series: Ukr Hits S-400 & Sevastopol: ruclips.net/video/rwlEc9paJBw/видео.html F-16s vs Russian Cruise Missiles: ruclips.net/video/BP3kf5oOezE/видео.html F-16s vs Odessa Blockade: ruclips.net/video/VN2oUutiwkw/видео.html A-10 Clear Minefields: ruclips.net/video/AhcnXiJdS1I/видео.html US-Supplied Cluster Bombs: ruclips.net/video/W4aRf9l5vGQ/видео.html F/A-18 Hornet vs Su-35: ruclips.net/video/nRrmU1upBqk/видео.html F-16A MLU vs Su-35: ruclips.net/video/FHxPMz5MhdI/видео.html Patriot vs KH-47M" Kinzhal: ruclips.net/video/C-q1tWlLh0I/видео.html Eurofighter vs Su-57: ruclips.net/video/OnKuV6259ck/видео.html Rapid Dragon 2 vs Black Sea Fleet: ruclips.net/video/sHTGKG1cYec/видео.html MALD, Storm Shadow & AARGM-ER: ruclips.net/video/d6p0YY_VQZY/видео.html Storm Shadow vs Russian SAMs: ruclips.net/video/5wJPbBAj0WM/видео.html Iskander vs Various SAMS: ruclips.net/video/KxxahORODBA/видео.html HIMARS vs Russian SHORADs: ruclips.net/video/DI6yIt0goPA/видео.html Storm Shadow vs Kerch Bridge: ruclips.net/video/UsHa9Fe29gI/видео.html Rapid Dragon vs Black Sea Fleet: ruclips.net/video/rvUTl6xjxqY/видео.html Ukraine With JDAM-ER: ruclips.net/video/deWnN1319Xw/видео.html UK Typhoons vs Su-57: ruclips.net/video/OnKuV6259ck/видео.html F-22 Raptors vs Russia President: ruclips.net/video/Fcmt2kdebvI/видео.html Air Force One vs Russia: ruclips.net/video/IDVULTyzcEw/видео.html AGM-179 JAGM vs 2S38 & T-90: ruclips.net/video/6-f8GJzxg5E/видео.html SEAD & ATACMS vs Kerch Bridge: ruclips.net/video/HJ0MgwXydyY/видео.html IMP US Strike vs Black Sea Fleet: ruclips.net/video/xSUAiTVwI6o/видео.html HIMARS ATACMS vs Kerch Bridge: ruclips.net/video/uU_SPj0HQgo/видео.html Sa-11 Buk Firing Sea Sparrow: ruclips.net/video/uBoryuBHfBQ/видео.html US Strike vs Black Sea Fleet: ruclips.net/video/KMwYjJghQiA/видео.html Rus SEAD vs Modernized Patriot: ruclips.net/video/FdoyfKgaONE/видео.html Rus Bombers vs Modernized Patriot: ruclips.net/video/4Y961tLNE18/видео.html JDAM vs S-400 Network: ruclips.net/video/wP4sfDG-01E/видео.html Kinzhal vs Pac-3 & IRIS-T: ruclips.net/video/i0GzbajI0mU/видео.html F16 or Gripen for Ukraine?: ruclips.net/video/Y-k71nfap4Q/видео.html Mig-31 vs NATO Black Sea AWACS: ruclips.net/video/vFOzjW25ItI/видео.html R-37M Long Range Shootdown: ruclips.net/video/-3LKGL4w9Q4/видео.html Drone Swarm vs NATO Defense: ruclips.net/video/wDBOSd9qCDs/видео.html Patrio PAC-3/IRIS-T vs Missiles: ruclips.net/video/N5Z81iW8YNY/видео.html MANPAD/IRIS-T vs Russian Missiles: ruclips.net/video/N9R9GUVcTyk/видео.html AGM-158C LRASM vs Sevastopol: ruclips.net/video/GDZoDRhIIRw/видео.html A-10s Operating in S-400 Nets: ruclips.net/video/5BwFlesg42o/видео.html Modernized Su-27 vs Su-35: ruclips.net/video/7llLDzeT2Bs/видео.html Modernized F15/F16 vs Su-35: ruclips.net/video/-TozTHbAXVs/видео.html Can Su-57 Defend Russia From F-22/35: ruclips.net/video/E-oC3NgxC94/видео.html IMPROVED Stealth vs Russian Bombers: ruclips.net/video/IgwLW4YKvVU/видео.html Ukraine Using Hellfire Missile?: ruclips.net/video/s_1YHDTmPPw/видео.html US Harpoons vs Russian Navy: ruclips.net/video/Oiee83CWRcE/видео.html Ukraine Using APKWS?: ruclips.net/video/FBxV9YuAfaw/видео.html Ukraine US HARMs vs Russian S-400: ruclips.net/video/eSyEOXsjWo8/видео.html Patriot/NASAMS vs Supersonic Missiles: ruclips.net/video/i1q7uDeinA4/видео.html Fulcrum/Flanker vs Foxbat/Super Flanker: ruclips.net/video/BhXfxc94JAU/видео.html NASAMS vs Russian Cruise Missiles: ruclips.net/video/pJI_b95jzpk/видео.html Russian KH-47M2 vs Polish Air Force: ruclips.net/video/cnrVxqL5q9w/видео.html Su-27 & Drone vs Snake Island: ruclips.net/video/T_oRoU2Ayfo/видео.html Su-25s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: ruclips.net/video/ryV65bUJzrw/видео.html NATO Eurofighters vs Crimean AWACS: ruclips.net/video/EiJ2dFRh95g/видео.html Patriot, Gepard & Gripen vs KH-65: ruclips.net/video/ZhxdrNjig1g/видео.html A-10s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: ruclips.net/video/B0tZoo0uLh4/видео.html USN Tomahawk Strike Kerch Bridge: ruclips.net/video/0vpi8xBygV8/видео.html USAF Stealth Strike Kerch Bridge: ruclips.net/video/IJbf9Bcxnw0/видео.html Ukrainian Jets Strike Kerch Bridge: ruclips.net/video/I8FumuZReB4/видео.html F-22 Raptors vs Russian Fighters: ruclips.net/video/ComRcmrwJWk/видео.html Raptor/Eagle vs Super Flanker: ruclips.net/video/keqYmuSEo-8/видео.html USAF Bombers vs Mariupol Defences: ruclips.net/video/aCsboOG0QU4/видео.html Ukraine Bombs Snake Island: ruclips.net/video/BX696MKdkb8/видео.html Stealth Fighters vs Russian Bombers: ruclips.net/video/rym90jnQDsA/видео.html Sinking Of Moskva #3: ruclips.net/video/NIjoyIieOzY/видео.html Sinking Of Moskva #2: ruclips.net/video/snjfbj_EwW4/видео.html Sinking Of Moskva #1: ruclips.net/video/Bxwh6MGLJNc/видео.html Russia Nukes Britain: ruclips.net/video/rzk45RFQwA8/видео.html Ukraine Uses Danish F-16s: ruclips.net/video/17Pikrp0QaY/видео.html Ukraine Uses Polish Mig-29s: ruclips.net/video/zCi4tAIzuOU/видео.html Russian-Britain Missile Attack: ruclips.net/video/zwIGfabvzHA/видео.html Ghost Of Kyiv: ruclips.net/video/Yrct8V4n1-U/видео.html Belgorod Raid: ruclips.net/video/mQykTxt6ftw/видео.html Eurofighter/Fulcrum vs Super Flanker: ruclips.net/video/MPyIipEhgR0/видео.html US Strike vs Odessa ruclips.net/video/KeiOHgzic6Y/видео.html Russian Helo Rocket Lob: ruclips.net/video/118GgGnP_sM/видео.html Russian Su-25 vs US Patriot SAM: ruclips.net/video/asp69ZD_tO0/видео.html Understanding Russian SAMs: ruclips.net/video/R4xTxLNZXcw/видео.html Ukrainian Jets Road Operations: ruclips.net/video/hBpzQhinPbw/видео.html Russian 40 Mile Convoy: ruclips.net/video/Vr_-2FLblBk/видео.html Flanker vs Super Flanker: ruclips.net/video/VOAuOFLJGk4/видео.html
I gotta say, Simba is the people's champ as a fantastic pilot, but you really get a feel for his true skill when he winds up on GCI callouts. His ability to stay on top of the battlefield and manage the variables, vectoring the boys to safety like a dad coaching his kid on backing up a truck with a trailer, really speaks to his talent and discipline. Great work!
Cap the ATACMS that Ukraine has currently is the shortest-range version. About 100 miles? Only air defense assets listed was a pantsir at the chopper base that was hit. Maybe Ivan was on a smoke break?
@@blueberrywilbur315 the version ukraine used was the very first version- M39. the russians are always so kind to provide battle damage assessments to ukraine so on the debris we even saw the model number and it was made in 96. this version has a ~165km or 103 mile range... official of course. the next step up in ATACMs has a 300km range which was largely due to removing 2/3 of the bomblets (300 vs 950 in m39). also interesting to note these rely solely on internal guidance- GPS wasn't added until the later variants. would be extremely curious to know how close to the actual aim point these landed. im an engineer so ill get nerdy for a minute- but i have a suspicion we'd agreed to send these for a while, but only the variants we don't use which have been in the expired/retired inventory for well over a decade- which means they're supposed to be disposed of as are most of the expired cluster ammo of various types but the army always has trouble finding money for that ;)- i know some in congress were shocked we still had over 3 million 'evil' cluster 155mm shells lol. but to think everything still worked on these atacms after all these years sitting in a storage bunker for it to still be able to hit its target and work as advertised is amazing to me, and i know from working on equipment (not mil but in the aerospace field) electronics and anything holding rocket fuel, batteries etc need regular maintenance- i think with ATACMs its 10 year intervals. but with them being in the expired inventory i doubt it got any of this. I have to imagine the actual holdup in getting these to ukraine was checking everything, replacing a lot of stuff (batteries for sure), probably a full refurb of a rocket variant we haven't worked on in a long time...and the whole publicly stating that we weren't going to send them was just a head-fake to the russians while we worked on getting them ready.
Officially it's well i only it in KM about 80km, at least that's the number they give out. Maybe the version you refer too is the Gmlrs-ER with some extra range up to 130km maybe.@@blueberrywilbur315
But perhaps GPS guidance was added to them? Russia does jam Gps signals tho. Anyway for a clusterbomb like that it's not so important. Are those 300bombletst in the 300km version same type/power of bomblets?@@swayzefan3600
It looks like you could have launched the MALDs earlier because they don't need to get to the target, just be inside the enemy ADU envelope long enough to drain their missiles. Yeah they could draw off the SHORAD stuff like the Shilkas when the ATACMS are in their terminal phase but they are still fast enough that the Shilkas would stuggle to target them.
Spoiler alert. Russian air defence didn't stop shit. 5 ATACMS were used and 14 helicopters burnt out and 20 damaged overall. 10 of the helicopters were the KA-52.
I don't know the software and I don't know the group, I only watch the youtube videos (many of them) but for some reason Simba is my hero. We really need a video of all the people who we hear so we can put faces to the voices
Another great video - with regards to the comments when the S400 launched at a target outside of it's range - it must take into account the predicted intercept point, which given the range & speed of the target would have been within the range of the missile. So it can fire outside the missile's range as it wouldn't actually need to go that far anyway.
I can just hear the debrief after a long mission. "uh...Super Cap...you spent half the trip upside down and you used up all your flares. Any reason?" Awkward pause "Well, I was bored stiff and had to keep entertained. You're fortunate I landed with a canopy still attached..." lol
Only US variable swept wing aircraft had computer controlled wings by sweep computer. The Soviets/Russians used fixed sweep positions, so the Fencers only have 3 sweep positions like the MiG-23, landing, cruise and supersonic.
Just to note, S400 max intercept speed is 3.2 mach, atacams is a ballistic missile with terminal speed over 3.5 mach, any intercept by s400 is a miracle. S400 is a freshly painted s300. It might be different with a new missile that was in plans but its far away from being available, late by years
Has GR thought about doing a video on MALD tactics (over/above simple ingress straight to the SAMsitestuff)? Concept? or Concrete Balloon? You tell me. a) INCREASE SAM MISSLE-DRAIN RATE in a large conflict area: Problem Statement : burn a MALD for just ONE Grumble... ah hell no, lets go for 2 or 3 Sams per MALD!! Testcase : Set up the typical Risk overlapping Sam ranges (consult Kortana, or maybe use one of her previous Hanoi From Hell-type maps) Have the MALDs ingress into Sam#1-radar-circumference at a point near its overlap with a neighboring SamSite#2. MALD FLight path to arc into SAMSite#1 for 10 km (or estimated point where Sam is deployed against it) then arc into Circumference of SamSite#2 (hopefully before missile #1 closes on it.) Hopefully you'll get a launch from both Samsites on a single MALD, increasing the depletion rate. IFF you can slalom back/forth across the radar intersection region, see how many Sams you can draw from the two sites. Also, this may test/find-weaknesses in the Sam deconfliction coding between two sites (not sure if DCA is smart enough to include fire-control deconfliction code??) b) Make 2 MALDS look like a very scary JASSM/LRASM launch... suck up extra SAMs due to 'perceived higher threat' SAME ProbStatement as before. Different MALD tactic. (here I'm assuming a SAMsite like an S400 would perceive an incoming JAS SM or similar high-tech attack to be more dangerous, therefore, expend extra SAM or two to ensure a hit on it... assumes that DCS allows the pre-programming of mid-flight-path changes, perhaps changes in EW broadcasted 'camouflage' ) Testcase : Single SamSite. Fire off a string of MALDs (2 or 3). Alignment should be single-file, vectoring directly toward the Samsite. Front MALD should broadcast a bomb-truck radar return.. something scary like a F15-SE Trailing MALDs should maintain stealthy-as-possible profile UNTIL - Lead MALD peals off, as if it just fired off it's load... head-for-the-hills mode of egress. - Trailing MALDs should alter EW-radar-return to be like that of a JASSM (make it a lightly too-vsible JASSM, so the radar takes the bait. These trailers should drop to low altitude and act like JASSMs homing in on the radar...maybe that threat will draw a few extra missiles. Variations on the theme? Have a tree-skimming MALD keep it's lowest profile, then suddenly broadcast a one of a couple threat' profiles: F15-SE A-10 B-52 or B-1 ... see which profile draws any extra missile designations. I dunno.... just early morning thoughts.
I wonder if the decoys had been launched earlier, would the Su-35's attacked them instead of the Su-27's and Su-24's like the S-300/400 did? Meaning using those decoys as anti-air as well as ant-SAM decoys.
With Current Hills excellent additions to DCS, any chance of some all arms Ukraine based missions with the relevant air, sea and ground assets? We have Chally 3, Leopard and now Abrahams along with accurate soviet armour, also workable Inf although none smart Arty is a little sparce, would look great as well now with 2.9 rolled out.
That seems to be the best air defeating decoy. Release a whole barrage of them; and have planes behind to fly in after missiles are defeated and destroy enemy air defenses. That would work for real first invasion. But what do I know it could all just be a game, and real life would not work the same.
You just said something that struck a note with me. You were talking about the AWACS jammers. Does any military have a missile that can jam as it’s flying from allowing any adversary knowledge that multiple missiles are inbound. Like, for instance, we fire the anti-ship missiles say 100 of them at the same time., The grim reapers fire say 10 AWACS version missiles that are capable of jamming the opponents radar. So they don’t know there is inbound missiles coming in. Is there any missile like that available in the military arsenal?
Because you can only fit a jammer in a missile. That's small. I would assume it's one thing to change your radar signature. But it's a whole another thing. In my opinion, to add multiple other signatures. I'm not saying the technology couldn't be made. I'm just saying that at this current point in history. I don't think that it exists. At least not at a small enough size to be slapped inside of a cruise missile.
That’s not how jamming works. If a radar is a flashlight a jammer is a floodlight. Turning on a jammer will make your presence known to everyone but your specific location known to no one.
Then can a missile like that work in a reverse order. My question was if 100 of those antiship missile’s were fired and you didn’t want them detected by the Gatling guns or missiles from ships. How would you hide their signature and my thought was to shoot other missiles that give a larger target array. To the skies, the inbound antiship missile’s. No I don’t fly with you guys. I’ve been following the Grim Reaper‘s for probably seven or eight years now. I am an over the road truck driver here in United States and what keeps me sane is watching you guys fly. Someday and I hope that comes soon I get to retire. I threatened a few times to come over to the UK to visit super Capt and the boys at one of the air shows. But I haven’t gotten the opportunity yet. Once again, I enjoy watching you guys fly. Thank you for the opportunity to ask questions.
Great video GR, great video indeed. I suspect that they are going to increase the number of S-300V's being deployed in the AO to prevent this from happening as the S-300V is an ABM system primarily. Still a bit embarrasing that the Russians allowed one of their heliports being attacked by TBM's.
For the tactic of scaring off an aggressor with a launch warning, is there any reason that a plane’s radar couldn’t be programmed to be able to mimic what a launch warning system picks up on? You could desensitize the target and confuse command/control loops
speaking of SEAD i'd be curious if yall have done a full US Navy SEAD scenario, if you look up the manufactures video of the ADM-160 MALD it shows how it would work with a navy strike package of F-18s and Growlers breaching a heavily SAM laden coastline- using MALDs and the new AARGM-ER (newest harm variant) - that would make a cool video. the newest HARM has about a 100+ mile range and will lock onto the radars last known position so even if they shut the radar down after the harm is launched it will still come at it at around mach 3- that was the problem of earlier HARM missiles. Could be a real game changer and make it possible for even 4th gen to effectively deal with S-400 etc. Does DCS have that newer missile or Growlers?
I dont think DCS can accurately represent EW tactics aside from some radar jamming. Most of that stuff is super classified as far as the working mechanisms. Growlers plus superhornet missile trucks with malds and f35's in stealth config would make for an interesting but very predictable outcome :)
ok really weird question. Saw it happen in a video the other day and got me thinking in this one... Could a SAM network be used to protect allied jets from enemy SAM missiles. Aka can a Patriot site shoot down an S400 missile of any sort. I know the pak 3s are only for shooting balistic missiles which go in a straight line but would that theoretically be possible. Some of the bigger SAMs are bigger than iskander (stuff the pak3 can shoot down). More of a hypothetical question not a realistic question
Probably but it'd be weird for them to be so close to each other. Also pac 3 is good at just about everything (if a bit expensive for some ) not just ballistic missiles. And what modern Sam is bigger then iskander a 24 foot tall 3 foot around ballistic missile ?
Afaik they sent a shorter range atacms which can do only 160km. I believe it's a short-sighted policy, the requirement not to attack targets on aggressor's territory is a major mistake. Russia has bluffed many a time that sending this or that weapons system to Ukraine is a red light not to be crossed, and backed down as soon as that happened.
I don't understand why you've continued to claim the US won't supply ATACMS because "they could be used against targets in Russia". If that was the case then wouldn't the same be true about Storm Shadow supplied by the UK? I don't know if *this* is true, but I read that ATACMS (and other US munitions) may be supplied with "rules" (i.e. "we'll supply them as long as you don't do XYZ with them"). Regardless, kind of a "don't bite the hand that feeds you" scenario. I just don't get why you didn't apply this same assumption to Storm Shadow.
GLSDB's are going to be awesome. 150km range (93 miles) and comparatively dirt cheap, with six per launcher. Perfect to mix in with decoys, hell, it would be great if there was a decoy version of GLSDB. The US has hundreds of thousands of rocket motors that are nearing end of life and either need to be used or disposed of. Winter is going to be very, very warm for every Russian within 150km of the front lines. Also, right now Russian helicopters are the biggest issue for Ukrainian armor, would F16's be an effective deterrent? Also would F16's be effective Wild Weasel platforms? If only a Polish F35 pilot would "get lost" near the contact line and "accidentally" jam Russian air defense radars....
As to the Wild Weasel question-the USAF currently uses slightly modified F-16C/D Block 50/52 (designated as F-16CJ or F-16DJ) as their Wild Weasel platform so it’s definitely suited for that role. It’s not nearly as capable as the F-35 which will gradually replace it as the Wild Weasel platform but the F-16 is still pretty capable and definitely comparable to other not-stealthy aircraft.
Russian helicopters are far from the biggest issue for Ukrainian armor, that would be landmines and artillery, with an emphasis on the landmines. Some KA-52s did have a few exceptionally successful attacks, which were very highly publicized, but those are just a few stories. What you won’t see Russian headlines about is the sheer loss rate of KA-52s because those types of missions are actually extraordinarily dangerous. There’s no real terrain cover in the areas Ukraine is fighting in right now, so the only thing that was keeping the Kamovs safe was distance - at the time of those attacks no SHORAD was in the area and their MANPADs were outranged by the Kamov’s Vikhrs. This was why they were so successful at first when Ukrainian offensive operations started. Then Ukraine rolled out a slightly longer ranged SHORAD system to the front and shot down 3 of them in a single day and the Russians haven’t been able to use the KA-52s in that same way since.
Maybe a better way to have played this would be for two or 4 Ukrainian Su27s to go aggressive. Be down in the weeds with nose cold and try to take out the Su35s with IR missiles whilst the others create a diversion
@@jdo8405 If there is a mass innovation or mass attack on mainland Russia, the Russians are going to flatten every Ukrainian city. Whether they're civilians there or not. That's why the Ukrainians haven't done it. Not because they can't do it. It's because they know the consequences.
russian pilots have less than half the training flying hours than western pilots same with chines skill levels should be lower they also have alot less combat experience. atacams has been successful in Ukraine without decoys being used so russian tech is clearly op
Fun gameplay, but its awesome it has nothing to do with real Ukrainian tactics, its easy to be suicidal sitting in front of monitor and restart your life at will. What makes me cringe a bit it exploits the war in portraying events in a fashion that has nothing to do with reality. Yeah, all disclaimers are given but this feels sour.. and all tech characteristics especially of russian ( and chinese in other videos) capabilities are taken out of russian and china propaganda. Waiting for a video where Putin’s Burevestnik will destroy DC, as well as other wunderwaffe, who cares it only exists in Kremlins cartoons
You all cheating in DCS. 😂😂😂 In real life, nobody knows how many SAMs the enemy is left even if you have AWACS. Another thing is the assumptions that Ukrainian lives are meaningless in this operation. And then again Russia nevers defends only with S400. I mean the whole thing lacks objectivity but pure wishful thinking.
Based on real life use the S300 and S400 is GROSSLY overestimated..you should lower its effectiveness by 60% to be closer to reality lol..but really everything gets past it in Ukraine and hits on target it seems.
@justinjohnson8398 anything to make ukraine look like they have a chance at defeating Russia Once america stops helping ukraine and at some point, we will, so is the rest of europe and then what happens.
Ukraine-Russia Series:
Ukr Hits S-400 & Sevastopol: ruclips.net/video/rwlEc9paJBw/видео.html
F-16s vs Russian Cruise Missiles: ruclips.net/video/BP3kf5oOezE/видео.html
F-16s vs Odessa Blockade: ruclips.net/video/VN2oUutiwkw/видео.html
A-10 Clear Minefields: ruclips.net/video/AhcnXiJdS1I/видео.html
US-Supplied Cluster Bombs: ruclips.net/video/W4aRf9l5vGQ/видео.html
F/A-18 Hornet vs Su-35: ruclips.net/video/nRrmU1upBqk/видео.html
F-16A MLU vs Su-35: ruclips.net/video/FHxPMz5MhdI/видео.html
Patriot vs KH-47M" Kinzhal: ruclips.net/video/C-q1tWlLh0I/видео.html
Eurofighter vs Su-57: ruclips.net/video/OnKuV6259ck/видео.html
Rapid Dragon 2 vs Black Sea Fleet: ruclips.net/video/sHTGKG1cYec/видео.html
MALD, Storm Shadow & AARGM-ER: ruclips.net/video/d6p0YY_VQZY/видео.html
Storm Shadow vs Russian SAMs: ruclips.net/video/5wJPbBAj0WM/видео.html
Iskander vs Various SAMS: ruclips.net/video/KxxahORODBA/видео.html
HIMARS vs Russian SHORADs: ruclips.net/video/DI6yIt0goPA/видео.html
Storm Shadow vs Kerch Bridge: ruclips.net/video/UsHa9Fe29gI/видео.html
Rapid Dragon vs Black Sea Fleet: ruclips.net/video/rvUTl6xjxqY/видео.html
Ukraine With JDAM-ER: ruclips.net/video/deWnN1319Xw/видео.html
UK Typhoons vs Su-57: ruclips.net/video/OnKuV6259ck/видео.html
F-22 Raptors vs Russia President: ruclips.net/video/Fcmt2kdebvI/видео.html
Air Force One vs Russia: ruclips.net/video/IDVULTyzcEw/видео.html
AGM-179 JAGM vs 2S38 & T-90: ruclips.net/video/6-f8GJzxg5E/видео.html
SEAD & ATACMS vs Kerch Bridge: ruclips.net/video/HJ0MgwXydyY/видео.html
IMP US Strike vs Black Sea Fleet: ruclips.net/video/xSUAiTVwI6o/видео.html
HIMARS ATACMS vs Kerch Bridge: ruclips.net/video/uU_SPj0HQgo/видео.html
Sa-11 Buk Firing Sea Sparrow: ruclips.net/video/uBoryuBHfBQ/видео.html
US Strike vs Black Sea Fleet: ruclips.net/video/KMwYjJghQiA/видео.html
Rus SEAD vs Modernized Patriot: ruclips.net/video/FdoyfKgaONE/видео.html
Rus Bombers vs Modernized Patriot: ruclips.net/video/4Y961tLNE18/видео.html
JDAM vs S-400 Network: ruclips.net/video/wP4sfDG-01E/видео.html
Kinzhal vs Pac-3 & IRIS-T: ruclips.net/video/i0GzbajI0mU/видео.html
F16 or Gripen for Ukraine?: ruclips.net/video/Y-k71nfap4Q/видео.html
Mig-31 vs NATO Black Sea AWACS: ruclips.net/video/vFOzjW25ItI/видео.html
R-37M Long Range Shootdown: ruclips.net/video/-3LKGL4w9Q4/видео.html
Drone Swarm vs NATO Defense: ruclips.net/video/wDBOSd9qCDs/видео.html
Patrio PAC-3/IRIS-T vs Missiles: ruclips.net/video/N5Z81iW8YNY/видео.html
MANPAD/IRIS-T vs Russian Missiles: ruclips.net/video/N9R9GUVcTyk/видео.html
AGM-158C LRASM vs Sevastopol: ruclips.net/video/GDZoDRhIIRw/видео.html
A-10s Operating in S-400 Nets: ruclips.net/video/5BwFlesg42o/видео.html
Modernized Su-27 vs Su-35: ruclips.net/video/7llLDzeT2Bs/видео.html
Modernized F15/F16 vs Su-35: ruclips.net/video/-TozTHbAXVs/видео.html
Can Su-57 Defend Russia From F-22/35: ruclips.net/video/E-oC3NgxC94/видео.html
IMPROVED Stealth vs Russian Bombers: ruclips.net/video/IgwLW4YKvVU/видео.html
Ukraine Using Hellfire Missile?: ruclips.net/video/s_1YHDTmPPw/видео.html
US Harpoons vs Russian Navy: ruclips.net/video/Oiee83CWRcE/видео.html
Ukraine Using APKWS?: ruclips.net/video/FBxV9YuAfaw/видео.html
Ukraine US HARMs vs Russian S-400: ruclips.net/video/eSyEOXsjWo8/видео.html
Patriot/NASAMS vs Supersonic Missiles: ruclips.net/video/i1q7uDeinA4/видео.html
Fulcrum/Flanker vs Foxbat/Super Flanker: ruclips.net/video/BhXfxc94JAU/видео.html
NASAMS vs Russian Cruise Missiles: ruclips.net/video/pJI_b95jzpk/видео.html
Russian KH-47M2 vs Polish Air Force: ruclips.net/video/cnrVxqL5q9w/видео.html
Su-27 & Drone vs Snake Island: ruclips.net/video/T_oRoU2Ayfo/видео.html
Su-25s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: ruclips.net/video/ryV65bUJzrw/видео.html
NATO Eurofighters vs Crimean AWACS: ruclips.net/video/EiJ2dFRh95g/видео.html
Patriot, Gepard & Gripen vs KH-65: ruclips.net/video/ZhxdrNjig1g/видео.html
A-10s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: ruclips.net/video/B0tZoo0uLh4/видео.html
USN Tomahawk Strike Kerch Bridge: ruclips.net/video/0vpi8xBygV8/видео.html
USAF Stealth Strike Kerch Bridge: ruclips.net/video/IJbf9Bcxnw0/видео.html
Ukrainian Jets Strike Kerch Bridge: ruclips.net/video/I8FumuZReB4/видео.html
F-22 Raptors vs Russian Fighters: ruclips.net/video/ComRcmrwJWk/видео.html
Raptor/Eagle vs Super Flanker: ruclips.net/video/keqYmuSEo-8/видео.html
USAF Bombers vs Mariupol Defences: ruclips.net/video/aCsboOG0QU4/видео.html
Ukraine Bombs Snake Island: ruclips.net/video/BX696MKdkb8/видео.html
Stealth Fighters vs Russian Bombers: ruclips.net/video/rym90jnQDsA/видео.html
Sinking Of Moskva #3: ruclips.net/video/NIjoyIieOzY/видео.html
Sinking Of Moskva #2: ruclips.net/video/snjfbj_EwW4/видео.html
Sinking Of Moskva #1: ruclips.net/video/Bxwh6MGLJNc/видео.html
Russia Nukes Britain: ruclips.net/video/rzk45RFQwA8/видео.html
Ukraine Uses Danish F-16s: ruclips.net/video/17Pikrp0QaY/видео.html
Ukraine Uses Polish Mig-29s: ruclips.net/video/zCi4tAIzuOU/видео.html
Russian-Britain Missile Attack: ruclips.net/video/zwIGfabvzHA/видео.html
Ghost Of Kyiv: ruclips.net/video/Yrct8V4n1-U/видео.html
Belgorod Raid: ruclips.net/video/mQykTxt6ftw/видео.html
Eurofighter/Fulcrum vs Super Flanker: ruclips.net/video/MPyIipEhgR0/видео.html
US Strike vs Odessa ruclips.net/video/KeiOHgzic6Y/видео.html
Russian Helo Rocket Lob: ruclips.net/video/118GgGnP_sM/видео.html
Russian Su-25 vs US Patriot SAM: ruclips.net/video/asp69ZD_tO0/видео.html
Understanding Russian SAMs: ruclips.net/video/R4xTxLNZXcw/видео.html
Ukrainian Jets Road Operations: ruclips.net/video/hBpzQhinPbw/видео.html
Russian 40 Mile Convoy: ruclips.net/video/Vr_-2FLblBk/видео.html
Flanker vs Super Flanker: ruclips.net/video/VOAuOFLJGk4/видео.html
I gotta say, Simba is the people's champ as a fantastic pilot, but you really get a feel for his true skill when he winds up on GCI callouts. His ability to stay on top of the battlefield and manage the variables, vectoring the boys to safety like a dad coaching his kid on backing up a truck with a trailer, really speaks to his talent and discipline. Great work!
Thank. its really hard vectoring people with the mod missiles. they don't quite fly and track correctly.
Canopies down? Who are you and what have you done with the real Grim Reapers?
Fair comment
Cap the ATACMS that Ukraine has currently is the shortest-range version. About 100 miles? Only air defense assets listed was a pantsir at the chopper base that was hit. Maybe Ivan was on a smoke break?
Wrong, normal HIMARS will hit 110
@@blueberrywilbur315 the version ukraine used was the very first version- M39. the russians are always so kind to provide battle damage assessments to ukraine so on the debris we even saw the model number and it was made in 96. this version has a ~165km or 103 mile range... official of course. the next step up in ATACMs has a 300km range which was largely due to removing 2/3 of the bomblets (300 vs 950 in m39). also interesting to note these rely solely on internal guidance- GPS wasn't added until the later variants. would be extremely curious to know how close to the actual aim point these landed.
im an engineer so ill get nerdy for a minute- but i have a suspicion we'd agreed to send these for a while, but only the variants we don't use which have been in the expired/retired inventory for well over a decade- which means they're supposed to be disposed of as are most of the expired cluster ammo of various types but the army always has trouble finding money for that ;)- i know some in congress were shocked we still had over 3 million 'evil' cluster 155mm shells lol. but to think everything still worked on these atacms after all these years sitting in a storage bunker for it to still be able to hit its target and work as advertised is amazing to me, and i know from working on equipment (not mil but in the aerospace field) electronics and anything holding rocket fuel, batteries etc need regular maintenance- i think with ATACMs its 10 year intervals. but with them being in the expired inventory i doubt it got any of this. I have to imagine the actual holdup in getting these to ukraine was checking everything, replacing a lot of stuff (batteries for sure), probably a full refurb of a rocket variant we haven't worked on in a long time...and the whole publicly stating that we weren't going to send them was just a head-fake to the russians while we worked on getting them ready.
Officially it's well i only it in KM about 80km, at least that's the number they give out. Maybe the version you refer too is the Gmlrs-ER with some extra range up to 130km maybe.@@blueberrywilbur315
But perhaps GPS guidance was added to them? Russia does jam Gps signals tho. Anyway for a clusterbomb like that it's not so important. Are those 300bombletst in the 300km version same type/power of bomblets?@@swayzefan3600
And Pantsir seems only decent for short-range defense.. I mean it fails so often, it's even worse than the old Buk lol..
ATACMS, someone needs a bonus for coming up with that great acronym!
Yes, lol. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the Federal Government (in general) have so many acronyms it is mind numbing. :)
I’m guessing contractors because marketing
Almost as good as PATRIOT.
If defense contractors gave bonuses for coming up with acronyms the industry would be bankrupt overnight.
@@bekeneelI find them both a bit cringe to be fair.
Guys, dont use nosewheel steering dueing takeoff or landing. Use differential braking
It looks like you could have launched the MALDs earlier because they don't need to get to the target, just be inside the enemy ADU envelope long enough to drain their missiles. Yeah they could draw off the SHORAD stuff like the Shilkas when the ATACMS are in their terminal phase but they are still fast enough that the Shilkas would stuggle to target them.
Spoiler alert. Russian air defence didn't stop shit. 5 ATACMS were used and 14 helicopters burnt out and 20 damaged overall. 10 of the helicopters were the KA-52.
I don't know the software and I don't know the group, I only watch the youtube videos (many of them) but for some reason Simba is my hero. We really need a video of all the people who we hear so we can put faces to the voices
The ADM can send out a signal that can mock the radar signature of any plane or missile in the world.
the latest variant is equipped with EW equipment (jammers) as well and iirc an option for it to crash itself into a radar.
US has supplied around 20 shorter range M39s APAMs.. Will be supplying the fuller range and different war head variants soon.
Another great video - with regards to the comments when the S400 launched at a target outside of it's range - it must take into account the predicted intercept point, which given the range & speed of the target would have been within the range of the missile. So it can fire outside the missile's range as it wouldn't actually need to go that far anyway.
Really enjoyed this thank you all.
Why are people saying Ukraine is running out of mig 29s. Isn’t it classified how much aircraft they have operational.
How do they know?
It’s probably pro Russian propagandists who are saying that
Gotta love the Reapers! They have earned the right to fly with me!
I can just hear the debrief after a long mission. "uh...Super Cap...you spent half the trip upside down and you used up all your flares. Any reason?"
Awkward pause
"Well, I was bored stiff and had to keep entertained. You're fortunate I landed with a canopy still attached..." lol
Only US variable swept wing aircraft had computer controlled wings by sweep computer. The Soviets/Russians used fixed sweep positions, so the Fencers only have 3 sweep positions like the MiG-23, landing, cruise and supersonic.
Great Mission example!!!
Next video : Single M1A1 Abrams vs entire Roman Empire
Roman Empire would win as the Abrams would have no logistics supply. Eventually the fuel, food and ammo would run dry.
Add some rain and Abrams would get stuck in mud and destroyed
Just to note, S400 max intercept speed is 3.2 mach, atacams is a ballistic missile with terminal speed over 3.5 mach, any intercept by s400 is a miracle. S400 is a freshly painted s300. It might be different with a new missile that was in plans but its far away from being available, late by years
Opinions of the new S500? I don’t know much about Russian air defense systems, I’ve just heard of S500/550 systems
Great video. I can’t seem to find the MALD mod. Mind linking to it?
“Staying alive is very important today.” I’m thinking the today wasn’t really needed
Notifications working again! Earliest I've caught a video
Love the simulations and all of the information. Keep them coming.
Sent a $$$ donation.
Where's sock? Miss that guy.
Drunk with Grump
Has GR thought about doing a video on MALD tactics (over/above simple ingress straight to the SAMsitestuff)?
Concept? or Concrete Balloon?
You tell me.
a) INCREASE SAM MISSLE-DRAIN RATE in a large conflict area:
Problem Statement : burn a MALD for just ONE Grumble... ah hell no, lets go for 2 or 3 Sams per MALD!!
Testcase : Set up the typical Risk overlapping Sam ranges (consult Kortana, or maybe use one of her previous Hanoi From Hell-type maps)
Have the MALDs ingress into Sam#1-radar-circumference at a point near its overlap with a neighboring SamSite#2.
MALD FLight path to arc into SAMSite#1 for 10 km (or estimated point where Sam is deployed against it) then arc into Circumference of SamSite#2 (hopefully before missile #1 closes on it.)
Hopefully you'll get a launch from both Samsites on a single MALD, increasing the depletion rate.
IFF you can slalom back/forth across the radar intersection region, see how many Sams you can draw from the two sites.
Also, this may test/find-weaknesses in the Sam deconfliction coding between two sites (not sure if DCA is smart enough to include fire-control deconfliction code??)
b) Make 2 MALDS look like a very scary JASSM/LRASM launch... suck up extra SAMs due to 'perceived higher threat'
SAME ProbStatement as before. Different MALD tactic.
(here I'm assuming a SAMsite like an S400 would perceive an incoming JAS SM or similar high-tech attack to be more dangerous, therefore, expend extra SAM or two to ensure a hit on it... assumes that DCS allows the pre-programming of mid-flight-path changes, perhaps changes in EW broadcasted 'camouflage' )
Testcase : Single SamSite.
Fire off a string of MALDs (2 or 3). Alignment should be single-file, vectoring directly toward the Samsite.
Front MALD should broadcast a bomb-truck radar return.. something scary like a F15-SE
Trailing MALDs should maintain stealthy-as-possible profile UNTIL
- Lead MALD peals off, as if it just fired off it's load... head-for-the-hills mode of egress.
- Trailing MALDs should alter EW-radar-return to be like that of a JASSM (make it a lightly too-vsible JASSM, so the radar takes the bait.
These trailers should drop to low altitude and act like JASSMs homing in on the radar...maybe that threat will draw a few extra missiles.
Variations on the theme?
Have a tree-skimming MALD keep it's lowest profile, then suddenly broadcast a one of a couple threat' profiles:
F15-SE
A-10
B-52 or B-1
... see which profile draws any extra missile designations.
I dunno.... just early morning thoughts.
I wonder if the decoys had been launched earlier, would the Su-35's attacked them instead of the Su-27's and Su-24's like the S-300/400 did? Meaning using those decoys as anti-air as well as ant-SAM decoys.
They have the 160km version but the 300km version is suspected to be over there too.
With Current Hills excellent additions to DCS, any chance of some all arms Ukraine based missions with the relevant air, sea and ground assets? We have Chally 3, Leopard and now Abrahams along with accurate soviet armour, also workable Inf although none smart Arty is a little sparce, would look great as well now with 2.9 rolled out.
Valued Viewers are not prepared for two seater ‘touching tips’ episode 😂
Cap! Quick question for your good self. Bone or Blackjack? Much love and gratitude for all your hard work ❤🇬🇧🇬🇧
Tough one. Bone is kind of a scaled Blackjack. But I've seen Bone at an air show and love it!.
Seems the latest satellite images revealed that there was a pantzir destroyed at byrdansk. Wonder if it was active.
Can you put the map on another display and still keep cockpit view?
That seems to be the best air defeating decoy. Release a whole barrage of them; and have planes behind to fly in after missiles are defeated and destroy enemy air defenses. That would work for real first invasion. But what do I know it could all just be a game, and real life would not work the same.
@07:10
Simba, I remember those mornings after the night before, oozing out of bed to shave my tongue. Youth is wasted on the young right Cap?
Cap can you test and upload a video about the F-15E Over-G damage ? Many thanks
Dang. I wanted to see the cluster munitions go off.
Well the mission was a bit of a ‘cluster’ if that helps 😂
Are you running Firestone tires it's been blowing tires in last few videos lol
You just said something that struck a note with me. You were talking about the AWACS jammers. Does any military have a missile that can jam as it’s flying from allowing any adversary knowledge that multiple missiles are inbound. Like, for instance, we fire the anti-ship missiles say 100 of them at the same time., The grim reapers fire say 10 AWACS version missiles that are capable of jamming the opponents radar. So they don’t know there is inbound missiles coming in. Is there any missile like that available in the military arsenal?
Because you can only fit a jammer in a missile. That's small. I would assume it's one thing to change your radar signature. But it's a whole another thing. In my opinion, to add multiple other signatures. I'm not saying the technology couldn't be made. I'm just saying that at this current point in history. I don't think that it exists. At least not at a small enough size to be slapped inside of a cruise missile.
That’s not how jamming works. If a radar is a flashlight a jammer is a floodlight. Turning on a jammer will make your presence known to everyone but your specific location known to no one.
Then can a missile like that work in a reverse order. My question was if 100 of those antiship missile’s were fired and you didn’t want them detected by the Gatling guns or missiles from ships. How would you hide their signature and my thought was to shoot other missiles that give a larger target array. To the skies, the inbound antiship missile’s. No I don’t fly with you guys. I’ve been following the Grim Reaper‘s for probably seven or eight years now. I am an over the road truck driver here in United States and what keeps me sane is watching you guys fly. Someday and I hope that comes soon I get to retire. I threatened a few times to come over to the UK to visit super Capt and the boys at one of the air shows. But I haven’t gotten the opportunity yet. Once again, I enjoy watching you guys fly. Thank you for the opportunity to ask questions.
Great video GR, great video indeed.
I suspect that they are going to increase the number of S-300V's being deployed in the AO to prevent this from happening as the S-300V is an ABM system primarily. Still a bit embarrasing that the Russians allowed one of their heliports being attacked by TBM's.
If they have any spare.
Could you guys do something with a future UK carrier group with all ship Types (26, 31, 45 & 85, I think)?
For the tactic of scaring off an aggressor with a launch warning, is there any reason that a plane’s radar couldn’t be programmed to be able to mimic what a launch warning system picks up on? You could desensitize the target and confuse command/control loops
Especially if you could “lock up” an AWACS, that would be absolute carnage!
Shhh
You should approach at the lowest altitude to hit the RED team! Swedish doctrine! it seems that it is valid today!
It killed many pilots during training! But was considered essential training!
speaking of SEAD i'd be curious if yall have done a full US Navy SEAD scenario, if you look up the manufactures video of the ADM-160 MALD it shows how it would work with a navy strike package of F-18s and Growlers breaching a heavily SAM laden coastline- using MALDs and the new AARGM-ER (newest harm variant) - that would make a cool video. the newest HARM has about a 100+ mile range and will lock onto the radars last known position so even if they shut the radar down after the harm is launched it will still come at it at around mach 3- that was the problem of earlier HARM missiles. Could be a real game changer and make it possible for even 4th gen to effectively deal with S-400 etc. Does DCS have that newer missile or Growlers?
I dont think DCS can accurately represent EW tactics aside from some radar jamming. Most of that stuff is super classified as far as the working mechanisms. Growlers plus superhornet missile trucks with malds and f35's in stealth config would make for an interesting but very predictable outcome :)
ok really weird question. Saw it happen in a video the other day and got me thinking in this one... Could a SAM network be used to protect allied jets from enemy SAM missiles. Aka can a Patriot site shoot down an S400 missile of any sort. I know the pak 3s are only for shooting balistic missiles which go in a straight line but would that theoretically be possible. Some of the bigger SAMs are bigger than iskander (stuff the pak3 can shoot down). More of a hypothetical question not a realistic question
Probably but it'd be weird for them to be so close to each other. Also pac 3 is good at just about everything (if a bit expensive for some ) not just ballistic missiles. And what modern Sam is bigger then iskander a 24 foot tall 3 foot around ballistic missile ?
@@MrDJAK777Maybe GBIs? Idk, the Iskander is huge lol.
Good video. Mission would probably be considered a failure, but thats the point of an unscripted mission
Afaik they sent a shorter range atacms which can do only 160km.
I believe it's a short-sighted policy, the requirement not to attack targets on aggressor's territory is a major mistake. Russia has bluffed many a time that sending this or that weapons system to Ukraine is a red light not to be crossed, and backed down as soon as that happened.
I don't understand why you've continued to claim the US won't supply ATACMS because "they could be used against targets in Russia". If that was the case then wouldn't the same be true about Storm Shadow supplied by the UK? I don't know if *this* is true, but I read that ATACMS (and other US munitions) may be supplied with "rules" (i.e. "we'll supply them as long as you don't do XYZ with them"). Regardless, kind of a "don't bite the hand that feeds you" scenario. I just don't get why you didn't apply this same assumption to Storm Shadow.
Most commercial pilots read books or watch TV. The autopilot does most of the flying.
Do they ‘touch tips’ as well 😂
That FLOT but unironically
Ahh The Fencer , a really bad Tomcat...
GLSDB's are going to be awesome. 150km range (93 miles) and comparatively dirt cheap, with six per launcher. Perfect to mix in with decoys, hell, it would be great if there was a decoy version of GLSDB. The US has hundreds of thousands of rocket motors that are nearing end of life and either need to be used or disposed of.
Winter is going to be very, very warm for every Russian within 150km of the front lines.
Also, right now Russian helicopters are the biggest issue for Ukrainian armor, would F16's be an effective deterrent? Also would F16's be effective Wild Weasel platforms?
If only a Polish F35 pilot would "get lost" near the contact line and "accidentally" jam Russian air defense radars....
As to the Wild Weasel question-the USAF currently uses slightly modified F-16C/D Block 50/52 (designated as F-16CJ or F-16DJ) as their Wild Weasel platform so it’s definitely suited for that role. It’s not nearly as capable as the F-35 which will gradually replace it as the Wild Weasel platform but the F-16 is still pretty capable and definitely comparable to other not-stealthy aircraft.
@@MaxIsStrange1 nice, I only knew of the Growler F18, so it's cool to know F16s will give Ukraine Wild Weasel capability.
Russian helicopters are far from the biggest issue for Ukrainian armor, that would be landmines and artillery, with an emphasis on the landmines.
Some KA-52s did have a few exceptionally successful attacks, which were very highly publicized, but those are just a few stories. What you won’t see Russian headlines about is the sheer loss rate of KA-52s because those types of missions are actually extraordinarily dangerous. There’s no real terrain cover in the areas Ukraine is fighting in right now, so the only thing that was keeping the Kamovs safe was distance - at the time of those attacks no SHORAD was in the area and their MANPADs were outranged by the Kamov’s Vikhrs. This was why they were so successful at first when Ukrainian offensive operations started. Then Ukraine rolled out a slightly longer ranged SHORAD system to the front and shot down 3 of them in a single day and the Russians haven’t been able to use the KA-52s in that same way since.
Su24 did not register in damage counter
"they're pretty easy to shoot down", apparently not, judging by the annihilated russian airbase
is it wrong to want to see the GR crash on take off??? Just to see cap face plant!
Maybe a better way to have played this would be for two or 4 Ukrainian Su27s to go aggressive. Be down in the weeds with nose cold and try to take out the Su35s with IR missiles whilst the others create a diversion
I don't think the word "defended" means what you think it means
Do a thing !
What's the problem with attacking russian mainland?
The Ukrainian civilians would probably receive twice as much more missile barrages and zelenski knows that. Not that he cares
Offense vs defense. USA support only defense actions. No war with Russia only help Ukraine. That and the butts want to launder taxpayers money.
@@jdo8405 If there is a mass innovation or mass attack on mainland Russia, the Russians are going to flatten every Ukrainian city. Whether they're civilians there or not. That's why the Ukrainians haven't done it. Not because they can't do it. It's because they know the consequences.
Nothing is wrong with it. NATO shouldn’t take Russians seriously. They’ve been known time and time again to bluff, and their culture was built on lies
Can you say Nukes??
Can Russian S-400 interceptor Chinese YJ-21?
You lost jets to kill helicopters? Ouch.
Hail the peoples champ!
ATACM vs Midway invasion force
First ! Btw love your videos and the group of guys you have during the missions, nothing beats the banter !
Why bother telling everyone you're first? No one cares.
@@mfreed40kYou cared enough to comment
666 likes? Changed it, lol.
Whew, thanks 😅
The author of that article has a very unfortunate name, ngl. That is all
Agreed.
russian pilots have less than half the training flying hours than western pilots same with chines skill levels should be lower they also have alot less combat experience. atacams has been successful in Ukraine without decoys being used so russian tech is clearly op
An S400 was never designed to intercept a missle like ATCAMS. It is highly maneuverable and hard to detect. I think this missle will likely be immune.
YAY
Dont use the name of Jesús.
Fun gameplay, but its awesome it has nothing to do with real Ukrainian tactics, its easy to be suicidal sitting in front of monitor and restart your life at will. What makes me cringe a bit it exploits the war in portraying events in a fashion that has nothing to do with reality. Yeah, all disclaimers are given but this feels sour.. and all tech characteristics especially of russian ( and chinese in other videos) capabilities are taken out of russian and china propaganda. Waiting for a video where Putin’s Burevestnik will destroy DC, as well as other wunderwaffe, who cares it only exists in Kremlins cartoons
what
You all cheating in DCS. 😂😂😂
In real life, nobody knows how many SAMs the enemy is left even if you have AWACS.
Another thing is the assumptions that Ukrainian lives are meaningless in this operation. And then again Russia nevers defends only with S400.
I mean the whole thing lacks objectivity but pure wishful thinking.
Based on real life use the S300 and S400 is GROSSLY overestimated..you should lower its effectiveness by 60% to be closer to reality lol..but really everything gets past it in Ukraine and hits on target it seems.
Ukraine is receiving attacums with the lowest range cap. So this video could never happen.
It’s retarded
unlikely ukraine couldve had this many planes also. this assumes a ton for ukraine at this point in the war
@justinjohnson8398 anything to make ukraine look like they have a chance at defeating Russia Once america stops helping ukraine and at some point, we will, so is the rest of europe and then what happens.
Ukraine ain’t getting any anymore missiles, since all US weapons are going to Israel now
Very boring episode.