@@NOTNAFilms _all of us, life's so easy we no more have that value we once called "HARD WORK"_ We have technology but for some reason the content of nowadays like the French loves to say it..."n'arrive pas a la cheville" of past creators.
@@weezy4094 I just really want to know how many man hours is that?? Excluding all the on site photography, all the story boards, etc just the artists getting all their reference materials, all the assets and being told ok, now make this. Like, how much does that take? Seems like an ungodly amount.
@@ivanm3342 Just for a bit of perspective. They said that the Devastator from TF2 took 24 hours to render a single frame. So you can imagine how much work the driller took
@@superstew79ILM did Warcraft and Weta did Avatar which looks better? WETA's work in lord of the rings, Avatar and planet of the apes movies shows they are far ahead now , Ilm has just one oscar in the last 24 years.
It can be overwhelming when used over the top and when visuals is the only thing a movie can propose, offering no substance to it. PS. A CG artist myself.
While Michael Bay has been outcasted from Hollywood these days, the first 3 films still hold up. The first one is getting a little iffy on cgi but visually these hold up to modern standards
@@erolc82 I don't know what to tell you. The next many years will require you to change how you think about the world. It's not a prophecy, it's already happened.
the effects are amazing, however we cannot ignore the fact so much of this being done in camera, if the enviroments were all CG it would not be nearly as impressive
the buildings shown in this breakdown are most likely from the blocking phase of the process that are later replaced with high-poly geometry and voroniy fractured as necessary. On the other hand the glass-facade towers are just that... simple geometry, glass polygons. In some other cases what you see in the breakdown might also be a proxy of LOD low-poly representation of what's actually being rendered. VFX pipeline usually involves rendering stuff in multiple chunks and compositing it together later for flexibility... So to answer the question, I don't think the studios tried to limit themselves in the polycount :)
Your work can feel irrelevant in the grand scheme of things in any profession. People often feel this way in music, painting, sports... Anywhere where the result is apparent. I've spent 10 years of doing CGI and I wouldn't be able to replicate those scenes in any reasonable timeframes. It's not a work for a solo artist :)
The whole thing is edited in such a boring and tedious way... I gave up after 3 minutes. Structure and rhythm are something that you should study a bit
Crazy how they used to drop these movies every two years
Goes to show how weak we got.
@@user-uc4hc9yc9n how weak who got?
@@NOTNAFilms _all of us, life's so easy we no more have that value we once called "HARD WORK"_
We have technology but for some reason the content of nowadays like the French loves to say it..."n'arrive pas a la cheville" of past creators.
@@user-uc4hc9yc9n we didn't take it fo granted plus covid and studios thirst for money
This film had some of the best VFX I've ever seen
Did you watch 'Avatar' ??????
@@Edit_X_13 Avatar is nowhere near transformer 🤡
@@planet.ai1 Yeah cuz it's miles ahead.
@@TheBlackywo0d 🤣🤣🤣 keep dreaming because it's not better than transformers
@@Edit_X_13 and what does avatar have to compete against the transformations?
That driller + building combo must have claimed a few lives at ILM
they literally hide the artist body somewhere😅
I was thinking the same thing, what a crazy complicated sequence. Looking at hundreds of versions per shot easily
@@weezy4094 I just really want to know how many man hours is that?? Excluding all the on site photography, all the story boards, etc just the artists getting all their reference materials, all the assets and being told ok, now make this. Like, how much does that take? Seems like an ungodly amount.
@@ivanm3342 I remember reading they needed close to 2k artists just to finish that whole scene in time. Don't know how true it is nowadays
@@ivanm3342 Just for a bit of perspective. They said that the Devastator from TF2 took 24 hours to render a single frame. So you can imagine how much work the driller took
That drill snake going throught the building is just a gorgeous sequence!
No matter how you feel about these films writing wise, there is no question that they are some of the most visually stunning out there
ILM are cgi gods, no one can touch for sheer quality and fidelity
I think WETA can
@@dominicMcAfee they are good but not ILM level
A lot of this stuff is also Digital Domain.
@@superstew79ILM is inventor of vfx 😅
@@superstew79ILM did Warcraft and Weta did Avatar which looks better? WETA's work in lord of the rings, Avatar and planet of the apes movies shows they are far ahead now , Ilm has just one oscar in the last 24 years.
The 3d tracking is amazing!
Vfx / CGI stuff is so impressive, can't understand how people are so annoyed by such a beautiful art form
It can be overwhelming when used over the top and when visuals is the only thing a movie can propose, offering no substance to it.
PS. A CG artist myself.
How have I gone 13 YEARS not knowing that tge Driller has treads like a tank????
While Michael Bay has been outcasted from Hollywood these days, the first 3 films still hold up. The first one is getting a little iffy on cgi but visually these hold up to modern standards
thats some grade A filmmaking!!!
Ai can’t do that! 💥 Need the human brain! 😅
I'm sorry friend, but you are soon to be proven wrong.
@@marcusdurand5387 another AI delusional xD
@@erolc82 I don't know what to tell you. The next many years will require you to change how you think about the world. It's not a prophecy, it's already happened.
Only the talentless are looking forward to Ai. It will never surpass manmade art.
@@marcusdurand5387 Stop talking and show us!
the tracking team...good lord
So much work, that's insane
Were you involved in making the Transformers movies? amazing
Cool effects
WOW TRANSFORMERS VFX IS GREATER THAN DC AND AVENGERS
ILM basically secured 80% revenue
AMAZING VFX ARTISTS!!!❤
the effects are amazing, however we cannot ignore the fact so much of this being done in camera, if the enviroments were all CG it would not be nearly as impressive
This film needs to go back to IMAX.
Perfect
How do the buildings look so good with like little to no geometry to work with?
the buildings shown in this breakdown are most likely from the blocking phase of the process that are later replaced with high-poly geometry and voroniy fractured as necessary. On the other hand the glass-facade towers are just that... simple geometry, glass polygons. In some other cases what you see in the breakdown might also be a proxy of LOD low-poly representation of what's actually being rendered. VFX pipeline usually involves rendering stuff in multiple chunks and compositing it together later for flexibility...
So to answer the question, I don't think the studios tried to limit themselves in the polycount :)
CUANDO LE DABAN EL TIEMPO SUFICIENTE A LA PRODUCCION PARA HACER BUEN CGI
I thought this is gonna make me motivated to keep learning 3D but it made me unmotivated because it’s so great. How many years of practice do I need?
A studio of 300 people with years of experience is what you need
Yeah, it's a huge team that work on these scenes -- and all the tasks are divided into simpler/ smaller ones!
Your work can feel irrelevant in the grand scheme of things in any profession. People often feel this way in music, painting, sports... Anywhere where the result is apparent.
I've spent 10 years of doing CGI and I wouldn't be able to replicate those scenes in any reasonable timeframes. It's not a work for a solo artist :)
Как же это всё тяжело снимать и особенно спецэффекты
and what kind of software do they use?
top
11:41 woah this looks weird like a dr strange movie xD
is it mostly projection mapping?
yes, all the crushing drill bot crumpling down the buildings shots are projection mappings LMAO :))
No.
4:06
Aradığın o türkçe yorum
idk what is real anymore
You used to, now it's all clearly CGI shit
those VFX look good and cool, but this breakdown video is kinda bad made and lazy editing.
Гта рп
So much work in such a shallow movie
Yea but honestly i dont think anyone really watched these movies for the plot
@@fragileparadox8658 but it could
The whole thing is edited in such a boring and tedious way... I gave up after 3 minutes. Structure and rhythm are something that you should study a bit
Tf does that even mean lmao, it's a showcase
Still not real looks😅 so CGI...
Is this a tutorial how to making bland, boring and bad movies?
That would be on the writers and director not the cg artists lol the cg in transformers is incredible
bro got drilled, killed, crushed and blasted