*I'd like to add a small bit of context:* around 28:40 forward - the doc mentions that descriptions in the iMessage chat that day of what Maee had sent on Snapchat did not match the picture he made the contact image. Yes, we only added the context of him sending her the contact info to the public folder and not the descriptions of the images she sent that day due to the victim's request (because who would want descriptions of their body at age 18 on the internet forever, what's currently out is already an uncomfortable amount). We did, however, see the descriptions in our call with her and like we said in the doc: They did not match that pic he made her contact image, further backing up that he had the image saved on his Snapchat since the time she sent it as a minor. Especially since it's also nowhere to be seen on the iMessage gallery between the two. These descriptions we didn't put in the public evidence are one of the several things that would've been possible to be shown in a call like it was shown to us to let the victim have some dignity in all of this. One of the many reasons we pushed for a call so many times. Some stuff is simply better shown in a screenshare and in private to people that can do something about it (in this case the Goons).
I find this very very hard to believe. Even if it isn't legal, he's 30 and she's apparently 23? Now, that's a seven year different and when she esd 17 he would of been 24, which yes. I think is very weird. But this seems pretty strange with blarg and his ass investigation skills, and also the victim and them saying they were freshly eighteen. Which again. A 18 and 25 year old are very different and I think that is still a pretty big age gap. That is just my opinion.
I’m not Blarg so idk what his feelings on this are but it kinda seems like he’s in denial. Like he doesn’t want to believe he’s gotten another groomer friend especially since he’s built a brand with him
yeah i mean i guess it makes sense because when you have someone that's been your friend for like years i guess being hurt from hearing that news would suck. I think he wants to believe it but he also doesn't. its kind of sad to be honest.
i remember even before this doc came out, seeing blargs comments and the way he responded hit me in an extremely wrong way. Regardless of if the stuff was fake, to go out of your way to deny getting any further evidence, and also not giving the reasons why you think it was fake is very harmful. even if there was to be a slight chance that it was real, i still wouldn't go out of my way to make public comments denouncing something of this magnitude, especially knowing their audience is a bunch of edgy 16 year olds.
well now i can barely look at my guitars. i started a big part because of him and my whole end of highschool, university and now beginning of my career has stemmed from that i can empathise with the dooo as looking from his point of view, he most likely genuinely didnt try to groom her, but just genuinely had real feelings for her but couldnt stop himself. but that age gap is just simply to much. he shouldnt have been acting that way with her at the time end of story. hes an adult, he makes adult decisions, he faces adult consequences, good or bad, whether he meant to do what he did or not unfortunately thats how the world works. im beyond disappointed. they say dont meet your heros...
They should expose everything and not hold stuff back i understand blarg being skeptical if doo really is a pedo then everyone should know everything so it can’t happen again and not bits and pieces doing that way makes it seem fake and like a clout grab getting the unwanted attention of death threats which makes it awful if it did happen and if they never expose the things that should be it can go unjustified and someone else would be at risk if u want justice or at least make sure no one else’s getting groomed by him u should expose
Thanks so much for your coverage on this, this is a really interesting situation and I’m glad it’s coming to light. Could you explain what the significance of the sleep calls? Heck, I’ve been on sleep calls with my girlfriend when we were in college (I was 22, she was 21), and I never thought of them as much more intimate than other interactions we had. I get that they add to the story of the Dooo getting close to Maee and grooming her, and they absolutely seem inappropriate given the surrounding context and their disparate ages. Is there something else about sleep calls that I’m missing?
The sleep calls are relevant due to the level of attachment required, and further developed, by such an act. An adult of 24-26, actively encouraging this level of attachment and dependency of a 16-18 year old, to where they are spending not only waking hours together, but hours while asleep, is objectively wrong.
sleep calls are typically more something you do with and SO. Its a bit weird to do it with friends (although you probably still could, friends can still be intimate) but its meant to mimick sleeping with someone.
18:04 No. There is a reason that courts try extremely hard to not have individuals with true stake in a case represent that party. A good argument should be placed fourth via evidence first and THEN explained in testimony. If you have a reason for bias, you will almost always place things in the light you want it to be seen in. Evidence for why I claim this 43:17 . Two people who have no actual involvement other than knowing someone are now being told that, due to not interacting or simply saying they do not believe the current evidence, they are not empathetic to an yet to be fully proven claim. "No one will yell at you...unless you don't believe the things we show you or respond to us, then we will yell at you publicly" - This is the reason you have a neutral third party in a controlled environment to arbitrate. If The Doo has really done this, send him to the actual courts and stack the evidence. Internet court / law isn't real. If a crime has been committed, send it to the people who can ACTUALLY do something about it...unless you don't think it is provable. I mean, she stands to get justice while also likely claiming emotional damages and getting a nice check. "I don't want to hurt him...but here is everything that could ruin his life"...k den. All in all, I hope in the end there is a decisive truth that emerges from it all either proving or disproving her claims...I hate cliff hangers.
Yk, he could ignore all of this, and just.... keep posting, no one would be able to do anything hes still getting money, he alrdy has a fk ton of money, and no one has seen his face.
Exactly. We don’t even know who we’re accusing. It kind of makes the whistle blowing worthless if you can’t identify the person. I supposed atleast you could stop supporting his channel maybe
i don't think he really can though. I'm sure theres a breaking point in all of this where leaking his face would become necessary to prove this whole situation true. I also saw something about a face reveal happening this year on the goons discord but i have no idea if that was real. Either way i'm sure the victim still doesn't wanna just dox him, and theres still probably a pretty high chance she won't, but knowing how many people are involved in all of this, especially with the original dude who leaked the situation in the first place, i would not be surprised if he would dox eric, as he already doxxed mae in his original post.
Why do you believe it has been disproven? If you are referencing Blarg's comment, that has been addressed in the doc. Please watch the video or read the doc before making claims on its validity.
How do you know it's been disproven? Cuz last time I checked, not one of them (the goons) have come out and outright said it was false. At least stay on the fence about this and wait until one of them makes a video discussing it or something. It's best to hear both sides before coming to a conclusion but me personally, imma just keep my distance from them until something is said
@@luxter858 As addressed in the document, and this video, Blarg was sent the screenshots about the underage explicit image over twitter DMs, then refused to get into a call in which Mae would have screenshared and scrolled through everything, proving everything is real and not faked, and allowing him to see evidence that cannot be made public due to privacy concerns. After the refusal, he took to reddit to claim it was fake/manipulated, citing a google search he did about iOS features. This is also addressed in the document. We went over everything we thought he could have been referring to, and explained why that does not invalidate the evidence. Until Blarg comes out to fully explain why he thinks its fake, absolutely nothing is disproven, and he continues to look like an idiot and/or a groomer defender.
@@luxter858 "guys due to my own personal investigation, i have deemed this to be false. Why? i won't say, but you guys can verify it yourself" *never comments on it again* yup definitely disproven :).
![[Mr Caption] No Todds, No Masters critique Fallout 4 (reupload)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zbaa2P9qL40/mqdefault.jpg)
*I'd like to add a small bit of context:*
around 28:40 forward - the doc mentions that descriptions in the iMessage chat that day of what Maee had sent on Snapchat did not match the picture he made the contact image. Yes, we only added the context of him sending her the contact info to the public folder and not the descriptions of the images she sent that day due to the victim's request (because who would want descriptions of their body at age 18 on the internet forever, what's currently out is already an uncomfortable amount). We did, however, see the descriptions in our call with her and like we said in the doc: They did not match that pic he made her contact image, further backing up that he had the image saved on his Snapchat since the time she sent it as a minor. Especially since it's also nowhere to be seen on the iMessage gallery between the two.
These descriptions we didn't put in the public evidence are one of the several things that would've been possible to be shown in a call like it was shown to us to let the victim have some dignity in all of this. One of the many reasons we pushed for a call so many times. Some stuff is simply better shown in a screenshare and in private to people that can do something about it (in this case the Goons).
I find this very very hard to believe.
Even if it isn't legal, he's 30 and she's apparently 23? Now, that's a seven year different and when she esd 17 he would of been 24, which yes. I think is very weird.
But this seems pretty strange with blarg and his ass investigation skills, and also the victim and them saying they were freshly eighteen.
Which again. A 18 and 25 year old are very different and I think that is still a pretty big age gap.
That is just my opinion.
@@thatguy5391 I don't quite understand what exactly you're referring to with the first sentence. Can you elaborate?
@@thatguy5391age gaps in relationships dont equal grooming or pdf
Has anything happened regarding Thedoos alegations?
I’m not Blarg so idk what his feelings on this are but it kinda seems like he’s in denial. Like he doesn’t want to believe he’s gotten another groomer friend especially since he’s built a brand with him
yeah i mean i guess it makes sense because when you have someone that's been your friend for like years i guess being hurt from hearing that news would suck. I think he wants to believe it but he also doesn't. its kind of sad to be honest.
we're starting to have 2 every month
Your community post popped up on my recommended, excellent video!
I feel like I shouldn’t be surprised there is another RUclips Freak™️
mod Ws all around!!
i remember even before this doc came out, seeing blargs comments and the way he responded hit me in an extremely wrong way. Regardless of if the stuff was fake, to go out of your way to deny getting any further evidence, and also not giving the reasons why you think it was fake is very harmful. even if there was to be a slight chance that it was real, i still wouldn't go out of my way to make public comments denouncing something of this magnitude, especially knowing their audience is a bunch of edgy 16 year olds.
well now i can barely look at my guitars. i started a big part because of him and my whole end of highschool, university and now beginning of my career has stemmed from that
i can empathise with the dooo as looking from his point of view, he most likely genuinely didnt try to groom her, but just genuinely had real feelings for her but couldnt stop himself. but that age gap is just simply to much. he shouldnt have been acting that way with her at the time end of story. hes an adult, he makes adult decisions, he faces adult consequences, good or bad, whether he meant to do what he did or not unfortunately thats how the world works.
im beyond disappointed.
they say dont meet your heros...
As a mod for eric, this is all true 👍
Shits gonna be lit
Ricky is the leaker.
peakness
Oh my fucking god... I liked him so much dude 😭😭
Don't mind me, just signal boosting.
hey im there
I’m not
im not either
They should expose everything and not hold stuff back i understand blarg being skeptical if doo really is a pedo then everyone should know everything so it can’t happen again and not bits and pieces doing that way makes it seem fake and like a clout grab getting the unwanted attention of death threats which makes it awful if it did happen and if they never expose the things that should be it can go unjustified and someone else would be at risk if u want justice or at least make sure no one else’s getting groomed by him u should expose
Thanks so much for your coverage on this, this is a really interesting situation and I’m glad it’s coming to light. Could you explain what the significance of the sleep calls? Heck, I’ve been on sleep calls with my girlfriend when we were in college (I was 22, she was 21), and I never thought of them as much more intimate than other interactions we had. I get that they add to the story of the Dooo getting close to Maee and grooming her, and they absolutely seem inappropriate given the surrounding context and their disparate ages. Is there something else about sleep calls that I’m missing?
Like you said, you were on sleep calls with your gf - how would she feel about you doing that with another woman?
The sleep calls are relevant due to the level of attachment required, and further developed, by such an act. An adult of 24-26, actively encouraging this level of attachment and dependency of a 16-18 year old, to where they are spending not only waking hours together, but hours while asleep, is objectively wrong.
sleep calls are typically more something you do with and SO. Its a bit weird to do it with friends (although you probably still could, friends can still be intimate) but its meant to mimick sleeping with someone.
OH COME ON. Not TheDooo too 😭
Fun fact the doo is still a virgin
Gentleman and Female Gentleman we got another pdf in the ring.
No fucking way
18:04 No. There is a reason that courts try extremely hard to not have individuals with true stake in a case represent that party. A good argument should be placed fourth via evidence first and THEN explained in testimony. If you have a reason for bias, you will almost always place things in the light you want it to be seen in. Evidence for why I claim this 43:17 . Two people who have no actual involvement other than knowing someone are now being told that, due to not interacting or simply saying they do not believe the current evidence, they are not empathetic to an yet to be fully proven claim. "No one will yell at you...unless you don't believe the things we show you or respond to us, then we will yell at you publicly" - This is the reason you have a neutral third party in a controlled environment to arbitrate. If The Doo has really done this, send him to the actual courts and stack the evidence. Internet court / law isn't real. If a crime has been committed, send it to the people who can ACTUALLY do something about it...unless you don't think it is provable. I mean, she stands to get justice while also likely claiming emotional damages and getting a nice check. "I don't want to hurt him...but here is everything that could ruin his life"...k den.
All in all, I hope in the end there is a decisive truth that emerges from it all either proving or disproving her claims...I hate cliff hangers.
bro you thought you cooked with this
@@lumonade7408 The way you typed that comment out it seems like the only thing you cook is fries at Mc'ds my man.
Yk, he could ignore all of this, and just.... keep posting, no one would be able to do anything
hes still getting money, he alrdy has a fk ton of money, and no one has seen his face.
Exactly. We don’t even know who we’re accusing. It kind of makes the whistle blowing worthless if you can’t identify the person. I supposed atleast you could stop supporting his channel maybe
i don't think he really can though. I'm sure theres a breaking point in all of this where leaking his face would become necessary to prove this whole situation true. I also saw something about a face reveal happening this year on the goons discord but i have no idea if that was real. Either way i'm sure the victim still doesn't wanna just dox him, and theres still probably a pretty high chance she won't, but knowing how many people are involved in all of this, especially with the original dude who leaked the situation in the first place, i would not be surprised if he would dox eric, as he already doxxed mae in his original post.
WHAT
heyyy 😉
The _______ situation is _____. ________ is done.
Do you think soup will get involved?
This has already been disproven and shown to be fabricated. Why make a video on it now?
Why do you believe it has been disproven? If you are referencing Blarg's comment, that has been addressed in the doc. Please watch the video or read the doc before making claims on its validity.
How do you know it's been disproven? Cuz last time I checked, not one of them (the goons) have come out and outright said it was false.
At least stay on the fence about this and wait until one of them makes a video discussing it or something. It's best to hear both sides before coming to a conclusion but me personally, imma just keep my distance from them until something is said
@@SpektrumSketch blarg did over reddit
@@luxter858 As addressed in the document, and this video, Blarg was sent the screenshots about the underage explicit image over twitter DMs, then refused to get into a call in which Mae would have screenshared and scrolled through everything, proving everything is real and not faked, and allowing him to see evidence that cannot be made public due to privacy concerns.
After the refusal, he took to reddit to claim it was fake/manipulated, citing a google search he did about iOS features. This is also addressed in the document. We went over everything we thought he could have been referring to, and explained why that does not invalidate the evidence.
Until Blarg comes out to fully explain why he thinks its fake, absolutely nothing is disproven, and he continues to look like an idiot and/or a groomer defender.
@@luxter858 "guys due to my own personal investigation, i have deemed this to be false. Why? i won't say, but you guys can verify it yourself" *never comments on it again*
yup definitely disproven :).
Hey Quintheo can you please redo the I am always 2 steps ahead thing I emailed you
Like the whole video?
I sent you an audio link pretty sire