What is Quantum Mechanical Spin?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 июн 2013
  • This video extends How Do Quantum Computers Work: • How Does a Quantum Com...
    Prof. Morello explains why spin does not mean the particle is actually spinning. Subatomic particles like the electron, neutron, and proton have spin, which means they act like tiny bar magnets. This can be used in quantum computing applications.
    We thank the UNSW School of Physics Demonstration Unit for providing the double pendulum.

Комментарии • 1,1 тыс.

  • @wimamohammad5285
    @wimamohammad5285 8 лет назад +1377

    we need more metal musician teaching science

    • @divyanshugupta2422
      @divyanshugupta2422 7 лет назад +11

      better

    • @lineakristensen1821
      @lineakristensen1821 5 лет назад +44

      Quite fitting. This man is clearly a rockstar.

    • @DSAK55
      @DSAK55 4 года назад +17

      Brain May

    • @BrunoVasco
      @BrunoVasco 3 года назад +4

      I wanted to like this comment, but the number of likes on it was too apropriate for the theme _|m|

    • @nyrdybyrd1702
      @nyrdybyrd1702 3 года назад +13

      Angular momentum may be understood, but we may never know why Prof. Morello isn’t this video’s thumbnail. 🤷‍♂️

  • @retepaskab
    @retepaskab 8 лет назад +875

    thanks for the heart attack at 8:27

    • @unknwn_usr3077
      @unknwn_usr3077 7 лет назад +2

      retepaskab hahah

    • @gokusan9967
      @gokusan9967 7 лет назад +14

      i felt it too

    • @MSinAerospace
      @MSinAerospace 7 лет назад +45

      yes can confirm... thank you for that terrible ending. I looked around my room wondering WTF was that!

    • @omerufuk
      @omerufuk 7 лет назад +4

      Same! 🤣

    • @seedogreed
      @seedogreed 7 лет назад +3

      exactly !!!

  • @veritasium
    @veritasium 10 лет назад +250

    the 1/sqrt2 is a 'normalization' meaning that the probability of finding the electron in any state at all must be one. So that factor is there because otherwise you'd have a 200% chance of finding an electron in any state at all. The +/- signs he discusses are associated with having electrons in the same phase or opposite phase - the best analogy is the double pendulum.

    • @Stargazer54321
      @Stargazer54321 3 года назад +4

      WOAH I didnt know you would be here

    • @TheLethalDomain
      @TheLethalDomain 3 года назад +1

      Holy shit this is the best explanation of normalization I have ever seen.

    • @chinanwang8646
      @chinanwang8646 Год назад

      Is it possible for spin to not be a probability and only a product of the nearest price acting upon it? The hidden variable would then be the spin of the surrounding particles? I understand that there would then be no link between two pairs since it is not based off of the others spin but can’t it be because two pairs can only travel in a quantises space where the spin of the surrounding particle would effect the spin on the other side of the surrounding and so forth until it reaches the the particle in the pair and coincidentally the length between them is always in such a way so that they are two opposite spins? This is for two particle pairs and I think you could predict spins of electrons in an atom judges by their angle from a line co-linear to the radius of the nucleus and perpendicular to the net magnetic field of the nucleus

    • @aurelienyonrac
      @aurelienyonrac 10 месяцев назад

      What if it is space that is bending and what we call a particle is a point?😅

  • @winkletter
    @winkletter 8 лет назад +486

    One step closer to understanding quantum mechanics. Seven billion more steps to go. :-)

    • @rdmman9962
      @rdmman9962 6 лет назад +3

      Look at what he is stating is in the simplest form equalizing with math is where you loose the ideal .

    • @vsiegel
      @vsiegel 5 лет назад +11

      But you already know it's steps, not a continuum! Knowledge is quantized!

    • @Fulikia
      @Fulikia 4 года назад +4

      "One step closer" reminds me of linkin park

    • @atila8623
      @atila8623 4 года назад

      😂😂😂😂👍👍👍👍

    • @vishal2352
      @vishal2352 3 года назад +1

      One step closer to the edge I'm about to break

  • @sadsalidhalskdjhsald
    @sadsalidhalskdjhsald 9 лет назад +438

    This is great, brilliant in fact. I just have one question... what?

    • @najla3370
      @najla3370 9 лет назад +9

      I have the same question XD

    • @najla3370
      @najla3370 8 лет назад +1

      توني اشوفه XDXDXD

    • @SF-li9kh
      @SF-li9kh 4 года назад +10

      I could never visualize quantum computing UNTIL he showed the double pendulum. Never seen that thing before. But NOW the picture is clearer

    • @ishworshrestha3559
      @ishworshrestha3559 4 года назад

      @@najla3370 wgat

    • @alanmcdonald7145
      @alanmcdonald7145 3 года назад

      lol

  • @sparrowhawk81
    @sparrowhawk81 9 лет назад +365

    Uhm, yeah. Could you repeat the part where you said the things about the stuff?

    • @seandafny
      @seandafny 8 лет назад +7

      Lol

    • @victorflores502
      @victorflores502 4 года назад +3

      Homer Simpson

    • @BigBez
      @BigBez 3 года назад +1

      Super position is two energies cancelling out each other while “up up” is two energy’s harmonizing to create a charge

  • @lupinearsenalALT
    @lupinearsenalALT 8 лет назад +338

    This guy is sooooooo good but that doesn't keep my brains from blowing up into pieces and splattering everywhere in my dorm after the pendulum energy model.

    • @omerufuk
      @omerufuk 7 лет назад

      😁

    • @michalkiwanuka938
      @michalkiwanuka938 7 лет назад

      Fuck Turkey

    • @maxmaxmaxcoolmaxmaxm
      @maxmaxmaxcoolmaxmaxm 6 лет назад +1

      Well, it's better than Africa...

    • @lineakristensen1821
      @lineakristensen1821 5 лет назад

      Haha nice burn.

    • @justinspitz2609
      @justinspitz2609 3 месяца назад

      I thought it was a terrible and confusing explanation I’m just gonna be honest. Which pendulum configuration corresponded to which state written on the board?????

  • @blowmeliberal
    @blowmeliberal 10 лет назад +284

    Unfortunately, the act of talking about or lecturing on quantum mechanics changes the description of quantum mechanics. Which is why it's so hard to understand.

    • @diegoalves8043
      @diegoalves8043 10 лет назад +17

      you sir just made my day

    • @a64738
      @a64738 9 лет назад +2

      Thanks for making me laugh :)

    • @nikkitytom
      @nikkitytom 5 лет назад +4

      Thanks for a moment of much needed humor. I guess I really am learning something about quantum mechanics when I recognize that double slit conundrum.

    • @benjaminparker8139
      @benjaminparker8139 5 лет назад +7

      My default response to this was to take everything you said literally and be insanely mind-blown at the possibility that quantum mechanics was inexplicable through a spoken language in 1-dimensional time. I have since come to understand that it is a joke.
      Lol.

    • @sanjayg6842
      @sanjayg6842 4 года назад

      @@benjaminparker8139 🤯

  • @NicklausSIR2
    @NicklausSIR2 9 лет назад +92

    The pendulum thing blew my mind. I guess it's clearer to me when you transpose it to the more intuitive newtonian mechanics.

    • @poorlittlesheep4098
      @poorlittlesheep4098 9 лет назад

      +9000, that's exactly what i was gonna say then i scrolled down and saw your comment.

    • @TLJGames
      @TLJGames 9 лет назад +1

      NicklausSIR2 It was a nice classical depiction of the difference, but to really understand how incredible the singlet state is you need to have a look at the maths.

    • @saamspam6127
      @saamspam6127 6 лет назад

      NicklausSIR2 the word transpose just made me cringe hard

    • @aceman0000099
      @aceman0000099 4 года назад +3

      @@saamspam6127 you're cringing at the use of overcomplicated terminology on a video by nerds for nerds?

  • @krzykris
    @krzykris 3 года назад +37

    The most clear, concise, and understandable explanation of spin I've heard. I wish I had this guy as my quantum mechanics professor 25 years ago.

    • @stanimirborov3765
      @stanimirborov3765 Год назад +1

      yeah

    • @takedonick101
      @takedonick101 9 месяцев назад +2

      You understanding this concept now could be the culmination of all the different types of explanations of the concept you were exposed to. This video could be the last piece of the puzzle your brain needed to grasp.

    • @justinspitz2609
      @justinspitz2609 3 месяца назад

      This just raised more questions than it answered. How did the double pendulum thing explain anything?

  • @derek
    @derek  11 лет назад +24

    haha, ok, point taken. I think the trouble may be the rest of the interview is too quiet but I'll try to get the balance right.

  • @fletcherwilson8499
    @fletcherwilson8499 7 лет назад +84

    yes, please get rid of loud sound at 8:27 Veritasium for future videos. Great video, but people listen with headphones...

    • @jonathanhart8730
      @jonathanhart8730 6 лет назад +9

      I literally jumped. I was so deeply entrenched in all this information I was processing and that sudden burst of sound was a slap to the face xD

    • @josephcoon5809
      @josephcoon5809 3 года назад

      At least pin a comment warning people...

  • @doodelay
    @doodelay 9 лет назад +172

    I will subscribe to see more of this guy, he was amazingly precise and interesting

  • @dorinori8189
    @dorinori8189 6 лет назад +34

    This blew my mind. And at the end it blew my eardrums

  • @KFGChris333
    @KFGChris333 10 лет назад +26

    0:59 When I hear "purely quantum mechanical" I associate "Noone knows what it is, but that's just the way it is... accept it"

    • @caseydavis6689
      @caseydavis6689 10 лет назад

      He means that standard Newtonian physics (what we think of as common sense) will not describe the position of the two entangled electrons. They can be in two states simultaneously. This is one of the basic properties of quantum mechanics.

    • @caseydavis6689
      @caseydavis6689 10 лет назад +3

      In his words, this property is "purely quantum mechanical." It cannot be described by common sense. (Newtonian physics.)

    • @KFGChris333
      @KFGChris333 10 лет назад +3

      I already knew that. What I meant is that quantum mechanics is based on axioms, and so it is, that there happens stuff that noone knows "how" or "why". Okay, someone could argue that we don't see vectors coming out from objects when we talk about Newton's axioms. (If he dares to ask the question, why is Newston's law as it is).
      But in Physics they are not taught as axioms rather they talk about "Newton's laws". Noone questions them really...If Newton's laws were thaugth as axioms and Physicist would admit even highlight that they are models of the reality, it would be much easier to understand QM. But often they surround QM with some vague scientific mumbojumbo e.g. "the explanation is purely quantummechanical" - That means that if QM axioms are accepted as true (they are because they tend to describe reality almost properly), there exist some mathematical equation, which spin comes out of.
      ps.Sorry for the length

    • @AlericResident
      @AlericResident 10 лет назад +1

      KFGChris333 I think he just means that there is not a classical explanation possible: no model that you'd recognize from every day life will suffice and give you an "intuitive" understanding. QM itself however is not synonym for "nobody knows what it is", QM is the most perfectly matching theory ever, very well defined and making accurate and precise predictions.

    • @TurriPi
      @TurriPi 10 лет назад +1

      KFGChris333 Trust me if you found the answer to quantum mechanics you'd be the biggest scientist genius since newton, perhaps even more than that.

  • @lancetschirhart7676
    @lancetschirhart7676 7 лет назад +34

    4:30 I love his face here, like "Pretty badass, right?"

  • @bjarnivalur6330
    @bjarnivalur6330 3 года назад +8

    4:30 - 4:38 I love that little "k?" at the end of the explanation, as if what he said wasn't super counter-intuitive.

  • @Homersonic
    @Homersonic 11 лет назад +7

    The best teachers don't make their students feel like they're being talked down to, regardless of how basic or advanced their subject matter might be, and Professor Morello's definitely that kind of teacher.

  • @AlbertaClimber
    @AlbertaClimber 5 лет назад

    I could listen to this Prof. Morello all day. His clear and concise explanations are almost mesmerizing. Thankfully the pause button allows ample time to process everything he says. Really is an incredible video. Thank You for this!

  • @joec.9833
    @joec.9833 3 года назад +2

    we need more of this person. the accent, the articulation in layman, its on point.

  • @user-se7gt5yf8b
    @user-se7gt5yf8b 8 лет назад +4

    What is Spin ? I think the answer is phase shift (= shift in coordinate).
    1. I think the de Broglie waves of multiple particles in one quantum state are connected in series, and the each wave shift msλ at the connecting point. (ms:spin quantum number, λ:wave length)Let us consider a case in which two electrons are in one quantum state [n,l,ml,ms=+1/2].
    The de Broglie wave of 1st electron shifts +λ/2 in coordinate. And the de Broglie wave of 2nd electron shifts +λ/2+λ/2 in coordinate. Accordingly the two waves destructively interfere.
    [the Pauli exclusion principle]
    2. Suppose that two electrons are moving in a single orbit, and suppose that the de Broglie wave of one electron shifts +λ/2 in coordinate and the de Broglie wave of another electron shifts -λ/2 in coordinate.
    The two waves have the shift of exactly one wavelength, which leads to a constructive interference of the wave, making it possible for the two particles to move in the same orbit.
    [the 4th quantum number]
    3. The variable of wave function Φ{φez・(r ×p)} in φ direction has angular momentum r ×p.
    Accordingly, the shift in coordinate msλ change the angular momentum as follows: ml(h/2π)→ ml(h/2π)+ms(h/2π).
    I'm sorry that I'm not good at English.

    • @davidwuhrer6704
      @davidwuhrer6704 7 лет назад +1

      Thank you. I find your explanation easier to understand than the one in the video.

    • @boyisun
      @boyisun 6 лет назад

      That's rocket science to me.

  • @davep8221
    @davep8221 6 лет назад +3

    Wow. What a great teacher. This is the first time I understand spin. For some definition of understand ;-)
    He clearly loves what he does and loves sharing the knowledge.
    Thanks Professor.

  • @NicknamedSin
    @NicknamedSin 7 лет назад +1

    Professor Morello injected this knowledge into my brain in such a smooth way, I hardly realized I was actually understanding. Seriously awesome!

  • @TheVersionController
    @TheVersionController 10 лет назад +2

    This is the best laymans explanation of quantum spin I've heard, and I've heard many. I finally can grasp it. Thanks!

  • @eucherenkov
    @eucherenkov 10 лет назад +8

    This guy is AMAZING to listen listen to. The way he explains things is just delicious.

  • @aryesegal1988
    @aryesegal1988 11 лет назад +8

    Can't say it enough: Absolutely amazing.. So clear.. Prof. Morello's ability to take a subject so non-intuitive and making everyone somewhat understand the laying foundations of it, is a true gift IMO... Great presentation, more of him, PLEASE! :)

  • @daroay
    @daroay 10 лет назад +1

    Veritasium... Never ever cut/edit the videos when interviewing this Doctor.
    Thanks for your Videos. Best channel ever.

  • @sirlordford
    @sirlordford 11 лет назад +2

    Andrea Morello is one of the best lecturers I've ever heard. His desire to communicate and ability to articulate complex concepts really create the perfect instructor.

  • @Woppieish
    @Woppieish 11 лет назад +5

    Got confused pretty quickly.... But he explains this things better than anyone else I've heard. Post more videos with him please !

  • @liamchandler8860
    @liamchandler8860 8 лет назад +5

    I'm amazed and inspired that you managed to explain spin so clearly in 8mins

  • @plainmainaccount5554
    @plainmainaccount5554 4 года назад +1

    I still have barely any idea what he’s saying...but I could listen to him all day. Actually entertaining as a teacher

  • @jamieg2427
    @jamieg2427 5 лет назад

    Professor Andrea Morello gives the best intuitive explanations of phenomena that I've seen. His video for Veritasium on quantum computing is equally unrivaled; in but a few minutes, he makes understanding why quantum computing is so powerful---in a way that hours worth of other documentaries fail to do.

  • @ChiaraCaratelli
    @ChiaraCaratelli 10 лет назад +5

    A really good explaination for a really controintuitive subject! Excellent work!!

  • @mrmojorison2012
    @mrmojorison2012 10 лет назад +6

    I love that pendulum experiment! That's so cool!

  • @AlericResident
    @AlericResident 10 лет назад

    Andrea Morello is from now on my hero! I could listen hours and hours to him. He's so precise, correct and insight giving. Here is a man who understands these topics so well and can explain it so good, that he is clearly above the material. Please more of him!!!

  • @seblingtonw
    @seblingtonw 11 лет назад

    Fantastic work on your videos Derek, and Prof. Morello is really fascinating ! I love that you (among others like sixty simbols) keep delivering us videos on these kind of topics, keep it up !

  • @yolanankaine6063
    @yolanankaine6063 3 года назад +3

    The explanation with the pendulum was excellent

  • @Krish-jm6ve
    @Krish-jm6ve 6 лет назад +52

    Normal Person : What is a quantum spin?
    Physicist : Slaps him hard on the face
    Normal Person : What ?! why !? My head is now spinning
    Physicist : Can you now explain what you mean by your head spinning ?
    Normal person : I now understood completely. Thank you !

    • @Familia_nepal_e_ahskanja
      @Familia_nepal_e_ahskanja 6 лет назад +2

      As a physics student I wish it was that easy.

    • @yoseyoda
      @yoseyoda 4 года назад +3

      A typical answer from a Zen master.

    • @4ltrz555
      @4ltrz555 3 года назад

      Sooooo, physicists aren't normal people.
      True tho.

  • @flowerlandofjohn
    @flowerlandofjohn 11 лет назад

    What an extraordinary teacher Professor Morello is, every clip you posted with this guy just compels me to keep looking. Brilliant!

  • @djsaloboy
    @djsaloboy 7 лет назад

    What a great explanation! The dual pendulum analogy was magnificent

  • @usfghost
    @usfghost 8 лет назад +54

    That heavy thick accent, awesome

    • @mihailazar2487
      @mihailazar2487 8 лет назад +1

      yea...but what's up with that moustcache?

    • @aceman0000099
      @aceman0000099 4 года назад +3

      @@mihailazar2487 you mean beard

  • @tubedude709
    @tubedude709 10 лет назад +112

    Quantum computers gives you the answer to life, universe and everything, but only when your not observing it :D

    • @Fulikia
      @Fulikia 4 года назад

      well said

    • @karthik197
      @karthik197 4 года назад +9

      @Red Dunkey you have multiple personality disorder

    • @albond
      @albond 4 года назад

      tubedude709 *you're

    • @MeesterG
      @MeesterG 3 года назад +2

      We already know the answer to that. It's 42.

  • @nihilisticpotato3367
    @nihilisticpotato3367 7 лет назад

    whoa! That pendulum analogy was very enlightening, a great way to visualize superposition.

  • @AlexBlate
    @AlexBlate 10 лет назад

    This is the best intuitive description of spin I've ever heard. Thank you! Please produce more videos on this subject and quantum computing :)

  • @magnetonerd4553
    @magnetonerd4553 10 лет назад +17

    Spin is not the magnetic field of the electron or other particles. Spin is an intrinsic property of elementary particles. The magnetic spin moment is determined by the spin of the particle and it tells us how the particle will behave when introduced to a magnetic field... A neutron has spin because it is a hadron. Hadrons are composite particles made up of elementary particles. Neutrons are made of quarks which in turn have their own spins. This is where the neutron, and analogously the proton, gets its spin from.

    • @ruchi9917
      @ruchi9917 4 года назад

      Can someone clear my doubt,
      If |a> and |b> are two basis states and the prob of both the states is 50% then we denote the total state of the e- as either 1/√2(|a> + |b>) and 1/√2(|a> - |b>). My doubt is, that the e- can also be in 1/√2( - |a> + |b>) and 1/√2(- |a> - |b>). Then why do we ignore these two states.

  • @timl2k11
    @timl2k11 10 лет назад +103

    I can tell he knows quantum mechanics very well because I still have no idea what the hell QM spin is. (inside joke between me and Mr. Feynman)

    • @whateverrandomnumber
      @whateverrandomnumber 10 лет назад +7

      You talking about Richie?! Why, send him my regards!

    • @iDEaXANA
      @iDEaXANA 9 лет назад +1

      Or maybe he didn't explain it well

  • @BenjaminSorvel
    @BenjaminSorvel 11 лет назад

    I've seriously struggled with understanding quantum superposition before now.
    That double pendulum analogy really made me get it.
    Thumbs up!

  • @IsYitzach
    @IsYitzach 11 лет назад +1

    Thanks for the double pendulum demonstration. I really wanted to show that my PHYS 201 class when I discussed sound beats and the general usefulness of the harmonic oscillator. Now I have a video version I can show without having to ask for equipment.

  • @Cinnamon112
    @Cinnamon112 6 лет назад +29

    So we're jus going to ignore that perfect circle he drew...yea sure

    • @NorthernDG
      @NorthernDG 2 года назад

      @0:23 for those wondering when.

  • @joebidendidnotwintheelecti370
    @joebidendidnotwintheelecti370 10 лет назад +3

    So then if the particles where spinning in opposing directions and constantly changed directions, what sorts of things could come of such an unnatural state could it be a type of perpetual motion that produces energy?

  • @incendiablo
    @incendiablo 11 лет назад

    Professor Morello is so awesome!!
    More videos with him, please

  • @TheRelain
    @TheRelain 11 лет назад

    Love these videos Derek, good job!

  • @jBeastThink2ice
    @jBeastThink2ice 10 лет назад +3

    This video is great, really appreciate your work!

  • @rileyb1799
    @rileyb1799 8 лет назад +10

    My left ear enjoyed that scientists accent

  • @Xxshadowman11xX
    @Xxshadowman11xX 11 лет назад

    I very much enjoy professor morello. His explanations are fantastic, and being interested in mechanical engineering and quantum mechanical processes, I enjoy his discussions. I'd love to hear more from him. Thanks!

  • @emilrahbek1688
    @emilrahbek1688 11 лет назад +1

    I have been trying to make sense of the superposition for sooo long, and that pendulum explanation just made it all clear, thank you so much!

    • @MR-nl8xr
      @MR-nl8xr 9 месяцев назад

      It's easy to understand with 2 objects, but try that with 1.

  • @DeanoDotson
    @DeanoDotson 10 лет назад +6

    I liked how you use Newtonian to show quantum works. Thanks

  • @apburner1
    @apburner1 10 лет назад +43

    Dracula does physics.

    • @Kevin-sy8uf
      @Kevin-sy8uf 5 лет назад +4

      One, two, three electrons ha ha ha

  • @donfede75
    @donfede75 11 лет назад

    Prof Morello for president !
    This is the best channel ever !
    Thank you

  • @MadaxeMunkeee
    @MadaxeMunkeee 11 лет назад

    I really enjoy listening to Professor Morello. The double pendulum was a really useful analogy!

  • @origamigek
    @origamigek 8 лет назад +8

    I'm going to have to make a double pendulum.

  • @erwindee7384
    @erwindee7384 7 лет назад +9

    Holy shit!
    6:49!
    Yin & Yang!
    Ancient Aliens confirmed!

  • @RCStudiosca
    @RCStudiosca 11 лет назад

    Good job. Some of the stuff you guys go over is way over my head, but I love it. Thank you.

  • @Wheau
    @Wheau 11 лет назад

    I love Professor Morello, he explains topics so well.

  • @alexanderstrau4135
    @alexanderstrau4135 10 лет назад +4

    But why are the two spins coupled two each other? I mean they are electrons from different phosphor atoms, right? Could somebody please explain me that.

    • @razortongue9000
      @razortongue9000 10 лет назад

      I assumed he meant that they are coupled simply by comparing them.

    • @robertofontiglia4148
      @robertofontiglia4148 10 лет назад +3

      As a simple way to put it, you have to remember that they have magnetic dipoles. So they generate a tiny magnetic field, and the other spin tends to line up with it, just as they want to line up with the other spin... They end up oscillating forever, just like the two pendulums...

    • @handris99
      @handris99 10 лет назад

      I think they are coupled by each other because they are entangled. They entangle them before they put them in I think.

    • @robertofontiglia4148
      @robertofontiglia4148 10 лет назад

      Deep Space Angel It does not have much to do with entanglement. If you look at the math, that's just how it works out : when you look at, say, two electrons, there is an interaction between their dipoles - they tend to line up. (That's a classical explanation, but then, the development for this is semi-classical : we derive the Hamiltonian from the classical formulas for the interaction between two magnetic dipoles...)

  • @paulgorowitz4007
    @paulgorowitz4007 6 лет назад +7

    Tommy Wiseau?! Is that you?!

  • @Martsigras
    @Martsigras 11 лет назад

    I love this dude. He is so good at making analogies and helping you understand

  • @johnb4314
    @johnb4314 11 лет назад

    Excellent analogies and explanations for general public. Wish I had had a physics prof like him in college. I hope we see more lectures for the general public from Prof. Morello.

  • @iTracti0n
    @iTracti0n 7 лет назад +13

    I just keep rewinding 2:03 - 2:05 because he's like a cat, and something just caught his eye and he lost his attention.
    Or maybe he heard someone talking shit either one lol

    • @earlspencer7863
      @earlspencer7863 3 года назад

      Lol he started talking about his lab which wasn't really pertinent.

  • @rajeas
    @rajeas 7 лет назад +19

    he has a charm...😍

    • @hughholt121
      @hughholt121 7 лет назад +35

      And other quarks.

    • @Jake23897
      @Jake23897 7 лет назад +15

      I think he is rather... strange.

    • @SpaceCadet4Jesus
      @SpaceCadet4Jesus 2 года назад

      He shows the beauty and the truth.

  • @Vork81
    @Vork81 7 лет назад

    Cool stuff, it shows some real skill to make something so hard to graps easier to understand.

  • @engineer15426378
    @engineer15426378 11 лет назад

    Thank you so much for this video. Professor Morello is an inspiration. I would love to study under him.

  • @Hyporama
    @Hyporama 8 лет назад +15

    i find his explanations pretty easy to get

    • @SigSelect
      @SigSelect 7 лет назад +61

      you must have missed something

    • @Hyporama
      @Hyporama 7 лет назад +2

      Yup, that's what they say..

  • @zach2302
    @zach2302 9 лет назад +3

    Scared me at the end

  • @svran1234
    @svran1234 9 месяцев назад

    Wow the pendulum example helped me a lot with intuition! Thanks so much!

  • @MrMagic1163
    @MrMagic1163 11 лет назад

    Would love to see more vids with him, he explains things in a very good way!

  • @DamianBehymer
    @DamianBehymer 10 лет назад +4

    Does he have a Hungarian accent?

  • @marcalbertmusic
    @marcalbertmusic 6 лет назад +6

    I had to comment because the video was at 666 comments

  • @JustinAlexanderBell
    @JustinAlexanderBell 11 лет назад

    We need more of these videos!

  • @KeiVal666
    @KeiVal666 10 лет назад

    He is such an incredibly good teacher. Wish we had more people like him.

  • @shirafingerer9437
    @shirafingerer9437 8 лет назад +4

    Can I take quantum mechanics with him instead of with my professor? xD

  • @seafreitas1040
    @seafreitas1040 7 лет назад +3

    I see said the blind man

  • @Nilguiri
    @Nilguiri 11 лет назад

    Fantastic. I loved the double pendulum superposition analogy.

  • @yusufshaik
    @yusufshaik 5 лет назад

    I had to watch this at 5 second intervals about 5 times (while taking notes) just to understand this well. Great video, Very Informative if you can actually understand whats going on

  • @unknwn_usr3077
    @unknwn_usr3077 7 лет назад +3

    I like listening to Russian accent 😂 xD; D

  • @fuand6532
    @fuand6532 4 года назад

    Amazing explication for a such difficult argument. Thank you!

  • @anastasiaoverton720
    @anastasiaoverton720 9 лет назад

    Morello is an excellent teacher. I'd like to see his lectures unedited.

  • @Defeshh
    @Defeshh 11 лет назад

    Awesome! I love these videos getting deep into what's more interesting. Sometimes it feels like the videos (in general, scientific divulgation videos) should get more information about the topics exposed.
    Thank you for this video.

  • @FilterYT
    @FilterYT 2 года назад

    This was very helpful, well done! Thank you.

  • @johny5372
    @johny5372 4 года назад

    I'm so glad i found this video. To all youtube video I found this one really made me understand something about spin.

  • @zundap100
    @zundap100 3 года назад

    Wow, fantastic I love this. Thanks Prof. Morello.

  • @SimonBuggeSiggaard
    @SimonBuggeSiggaard 11 лет назад

    I really think that this video is a good one! Especially because it tries to give a way to understand (or interpret) the spins. Also, this channel is becoming my favourite over Ve1, just because the acedemic level is higher. More quantum mechanics!

  • @jb8517
    @jb8517 3 года назад

    Great explanation, Mr. Nugent.

  • @seanattikus
    @seanattikus 11 лет назад

    This guy is awesome. I love watching videos with him in them

  • @Scrollwithme56
    @Scrollwithme56 Год назад +1

    Thanks a lot sir from India 🇮🇳 to make this concept easy to understand.....🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
    Commendable lecture ✨💫

  • @nadavslotky
    @nadavslotky 11 лет назад

    Thank you.
    This video was enlightning.

  • @jaymyn88
    @jaymyn88 10 лет назад

    I love the pendulum demo. It's such a cleaver way to present this abstract quantum mechanical concepts to visual learners. Super! :)

  • @JuulSimon
    @JuulSimon 11 лет назад

    Prof. Morello is fantastic.
    He reminds me a bit of an associate professor I had when I did physics.

  • @1nsiderr
    @1nsiderr 10 лет назад

    Double-pendulum = entangled state. Great analogy. Prof. Morello explains stuff better than any teacher I've ever had. I love this!

  • @doneche1
    @doneche1 10 лет назад

    This gentleman does a fantastic job explaining these concepts. :)