Thanks. Only explanation I have found on why angle adjusted rangefinders do not give correct adjustments as distance increases. It helps to understand the why. Looks like I will have to invest in a more expensive rangefinder. Is there another way to get the angle of shot and plug it in to my ballistic solver that would be practical to use? Your explanation made me subscribe to your channel. Thanks, again.
I thought you treat uphill and downhill shots the same. Bullet doesn’t know if it’s shooting up or down. It’s effected by drag the same weather shot up or down hill is it not? The thing that changes is the distance to the target with an angled shot? Not commenting for an argument, rather just genuinely curious.
yeah this isn't true at all. you saying that the BC changes when fired uphill or downhill would mean the velocity of the bullet changes, and that's just plain wrong. You do treat uphill and downhill shots essentially the same, they will both hit high... the only thing that changes is the path and unless your angles are drastic, and at long range, the bullet is affected minimally. drastic angles, over long distance must be accounted for.
Wrong. Draw a free body diagram of the forces acting on the bullet. When shooting up hill gravity is resisting the motion of the bullet along its path. When shooting downhill gravity is acting with the direction of motion. Take it to the extreme and shoot perfectly vertical towards the sky and measure the distance the bullet travels before velocity goes to zero. Now shoot straight down and measure the distance where the velocity goes to zero.
This is correct. Many "ballistic rangefinders" don't account for this because the amount of variance is relatively small. However, at longer distances, its necessary.
So much to learn, so little time. Great explanation. Thanks
Very well explained. Thank you!
This dude is a great shot!
That was very good, as it explained the problem of steep elevation shooting SIMPLY...........THANKS
Ricky Bobby didn't know what to do with his hands either.
Excellent info. Also good wind call in what looks like a stout wind
Thanks. You explained it in the first minute
Все объяснил за менее чем минути ....
Well done Bri!
Thanks. Only explanation I have found on why angle adjusted rangefinders do not give correct adjustments as distance increases. It helps to understand the why. Looks like I will have to invest in a more expensive rangefinder. Is there another way to get the angle of shot and plug it in to my ballistic solver that would be practical to use? Your explanation made me subscribe to your channel. Thanks, again.
Well done, should have paid more attention to Trigonometry class
Nice vid I love the scope
Great video, thanks!
and this is why I deep dive RUclips. thank you for informing me.
Excellent!
What would be the math equation to figure and calculate adjustment for this?
Cosine of the angle x the dope for that range. You can download a cosine chart from the Internet.
La generación de mi rifles es un poco anterior, Remington 700-M24 SWS con un Visor Leupold Mark 4 LR/T M3 10x 40 mm.
What rifle is this
How much does a course cost?
V good
my Kestrel and my mil dot master are IRREPLACEABLE!!!!!
Or just use Pythagoras's Thrum. A Squared X B Squared = C Squared. A2 X B2 = C2..
Only $1,300 for the rangefinder.
This did not work on my wife.
Impact 4000 arrives tomorrow.
Uphill shots effectively increase drag ( lowers apparent BC). Downhill shots effectively reduce drag ( raises apparent BC).
I thought you treat uphill and downhill shots the same. Bullet doesn’t know if it’s shooting up or down. It’s effected by drag the same weather shot up or down hill is it not? The thing that changes is the distance to the target with an angled shot? Not commenting for an argument, rather just genuinely curious.
False.
yeah this isn't true at all. you saying that the BC changes when fired uphill or downhill would mean the velocity of the bullet changes, and that's just plain wrong. You do treat uphill and downhill shots essentially the same, they will both hit high... the only thing that changes is the path and unless your angles are drastic, and at long range, the bullet is affected minimally. drastic angles, over long distance must be accounted for.
Wrong. Draw a free body diagram of the forces acting on the bullet. When shooting up hill gravity is resisting the motion of the bullet along its path. When shooting downhill gravity is acting with the direction of motion. Take it to the extreme and shoot perfectly vertical towards the sky and measure the distance the bullet travels before velocity goes to zero. Now shoot straight down and measure the distance where the velocity goes to zero.
This is correct. Many "ballistic rangefinders" don't account for this because the amount of variance is relatively small. However, at longer distances, its necessary.
Necesito ese telmemetro inteligente de esa última generación. Porque si llegase estar en mi mira no corras, simplemente you will die tired. 🫡