Why all major powers are trying to get Aircraft carriers now ?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
  • / discord
    Our Web:alphadefense.in​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
    *******************************************************
    Join us on Social Media.
    FB: / thealphadefense
    Twitter: @alpha_defense
    Instagram: @thealphadefense
    Alpha Defense Hindi: / alphadefensehindi​​​​​​​​
    #AlphaDefense​​​​​​​​ #IndianNavy #DRDO

Комментарии • 357

  • @sharmavarun
    @sharmavarun 3 года назад +98

    Cricket team vala example bahot sahi diya. Apne desh ke "buddhujeevi" patrakaro ki vastavikta bhi bahot sahi se batai. Bahot achha video banaya hai bhai.

  • @saqlainalam8090
    @saqlainalam8090 3 года назад +68

    That's why Alpha defence is owesome. His explanation skills is amazing. You should be in Indian defence policy makers team.

    • @pradeepmdwp1842
      @pradeepmdwp1842 3 года назад +1

      @@KS-op9bb Tume kya lagta hai?🧐🤔

    • @bibinthomas5282
      @bibinthomas5282 3 года назад

      @@KS-op9bb shayadd...apna pockets fill karna hee unka kaam 😌😌

    • @saqlainalam8090
      @saqlainalam8090 3 года назад

      @@KS-op9bb bewakuf nhi but their problem solving approach is traditional. They did not evolve with the pace of world.

    • @siddeshnaik2296
      @siddeshnaik2296 3 года назад

      I think thry consider these things and many things which are secret the problem is that the processes are very slow and lots of red tape making the process efficient also if we depend on govt companies then we are doomed we should involve more private focus on future tech and get govt companies in line we shud focus not only on self sufficient but also as a top 5 defense exporter in next 10 years

    • @diecastworld7962
      @diecastworld7962 2 года назад

      @@KS-op9bb ha dabakuwf log hi ministry of Defence may hay barna aj 42 ke jaga 25 squadron nahi hota air force may

  • @skg901
    @skg901 3 года назад +41

    To counter the red rascals...

  • @rohitkothari3890
    @rohitkothari3890 3 года назад +70

    Carrier based drones will be the future of sea dominance.

  • @okman9684
    @okman9684 3 года назад +55

    We need a third aircraft carrier not because it looks cool but we have to dominate in indian ocean as well as south china sea

    • @b12abhaypatel7
      @b12abhaypatel7 3 года назад +2

      India is developing not developed...

    • @shaankhaan1686
      @shaankhaan1686 3 года назад +9

      @@b12abhaypatel7 but was powerful still powerful and will be powerful 🇮🇳❤️ 2 roti kam khaenge par jo aankh dikhae uski ma chod k aayenge 😘

    • @highondankium3626
      @highondankium3626 3 года назад +3

      We can't dominate south china sea.... Kuch bhi chutiya giri mat likho

    • @shaankhaan1686
      @shaankhaan1686 3 года назад

      @@highondankium3626 here we is China 🤣🤣🤣 i know bro u got butt hurt kicks from INDIAN Army 🇮🇳

    • @thinkbank8709
      @thinkbank8709 3 года назад +5

      @@highondankium3626 India need to build at least some capability to launch offensive mission in South China sea. China is growing it's navy not only to protect its own backyard but also to project power in Indian Ocean and Pacific. When your enemy can defend and attack and you only can defend, you have already lost.

  • @nilnull5457
    @nilnull5457 3 года назад +34

    Also, aircraft carriers are important for power projection. Subs are only for attack roles, while aircraft carriers, being powerful and visually non-stealthy, allow for different missions, including HADR Ops.

  • @kaustabhsingharoy5403
    @kaustabhsingharoy5403 3 года назад +69

    Because they understand reality, they are not driven by fake experts, who are also under conflict of interest.

    • @abhishekdev258
      @abhishekdev258 3 года назад +5

      @KJM you mean Ajay Shukla??

    • @SudhirChauhan
      @SudhirChauhan 3 года назад

      They R under cover agents. Creating seeds of doubt

    • @vidt999
      @vidt999 3 года назад

      @KJM then you are ajay shukla🤣

    • @vidt999
      @vidt999 3 года назад

      @KJM all are biased, ajay shukla and ravish towards the left, abhijit to the right
      What is the big deal.

    • @vidt999
      @vidt999 3 года назад

      @KJM i dont know about aeronautics, but indian airforce has a very bad track record on getting the requirements for the unit right and are a confused lot.

  • @hira_thakur276
    @hira_thakur276 3 года назад +37

    इतनी अच्छी explanation..... Wow🙂🙂❤️👍👍

  • @kanav1801
    @kanav1801 3 года назад +21

    Do we secretly have a third Nuclear submarine from Arihant class ?

    • @strategicindian
      @strategicindian 3 года назад +1

      We are building more numbers and even bigger ones

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 года назад +15

      Yup ! Arihant Arighat S4 (Launched) and S4* (In refits)

    • @arunkumarts8279
      @arunkumarts8279 3 года назад

      @@guy4814 is that S4?

    • @arunkumarts8279
      @arunkumarts8279 3 года назад

      @@guy4814 I thought S3 as Arighat and S4 as Aridhaman.

  • @abirbo
    @abirbo 3 года назад +18

    I hope Japan names their LHD's as Akagi, Kaga, Hiryu and Soryu. They already have Kaga. It will be a tribute to the ones lost in Midway.

  • @RaghuReddy88
    @RaghuReddy88 3 года назад +9

    Could please make a English verson with more template and graphical work. There is huge potential for such videos and we could have our own Caspianreport/infographic channels

  • @tanmayadas68
    @tanmayadas68 3 года назад +2

    Isme Pakistan jesa super power kese nahi Nahi hey 😑😑. Oo sorry unke pass jo jf 17 jo without refuel black hole main entry mar ke white hole se wapas aa sakta hey. They don't need aircraft carrier like sitting ducks.

  • @harshkanojiya4513
    @harshkanojiya4513 3 года назад +7

    Afganistan ke 3 lakh soldier ne surrender kar jiya aur longevala ki ladai me humare sirf 120 soldier pakistan ke soldier ko hara diya isliye india army is the best army in the world 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 proud of you indian army jai hind!

  • @rajs2659
    @rajs2659 3 года назад +9

    Due to f-35b. They can have fifth gen fighter on 25k ton helicopter carrier also.

    • @someon713
      @someon713 3 года назад +4

      Japan can only carry 10 F-35B on their helicopter carrier. Only 20 F-35 with 2 helicopter carriers.
      We can use CATS warrior as the fixed wing fighters in place of F-35B.
      Better have another carrier AND 2-4 helicopter carriers.

  • @-ShantanuShinde
    @-ShantanuShinde 3 года назад +5

    We need to develop engines for aircrafts, drones, surface to air systems like S-400 on immediate basis to support the development of area denial platforms.

  • @mywork8974
    @mywork8974 3 года назад +2

    भारत के पास बोम्बर होने चाहिए

  • @yogastakam6613
    @yogastakam6613 3 года назад +3

    Awesome explanation Bro❤️❤️❤️

  • @RP-qs1tp
    @RP-qs1tp 3 года назад +1

    I disagree with your analysis, in 21st century Aircraft carrier is useless for a country like India because we believe in defense. The other nations namely US and China are both aggressive that’s not our way of doing things. Another large power Russia has also declared AC useless which can be destroyed with barrage of modern supersonic and (hypersonic in future) missiles easily. Just bcuz some countries are thinking of converting LHD is due to availability of F35 to them. They are not specifically looking to build large carriers but making a smart move of dual use of available platforms. Both are different things.
    Same amount of 5+bn can be divided to buy nuclear submarines , drones and developing our island with air strips ( unsinkable carrier ). When we have a limited budget which is clear across armed forces the procurement needs to be in smart areas and bring harmonization amongst various arms of forces. I don’t feel we achieve that with carrier. From an engineering point of view it’s something to be proud of but from use it’s not worth the bill! For ex: you can get 36 more loaded Rafales plus a couple of submarines at same price!

  • @sumitchand3447
    @sumitchand3447 3 года назад +1

    True i mean lallantop and wire ke defence journalists piche pade the as a propaganda to degrade indigenous manufacturing skills... vikrant ki lifts ko lekar... laughing seriously....now navy have shut them up gud by saying it can even accomodate rafale m....

  • @Puran.
    @Puran. 3 года назад +4

    Kuznetsov Lionang aur Shandong aircraft carrier me jab aircraft take off kerta he Tab piche ek diwar type boost ke liye kya hota he ? Aur vikrant me kyu nahi he aesa...?

    • @tyrantfox7801
      @tyrantfox7801 3 года назад

      It's for deflecting jet exhaust , not for boosting thrust.
      American and French carriers have those too

    • @Puran.
      @Puran. 3 года назад

      @@tyrantfox7801 wo hi to Ise kya kehte he?

  • @gaurav4211
    @gaurav4211 3 года назад +1

    I don't like the concept of making a new aircraft carrier, coz it's not aircraft carrier u have to build, u need to have destroyers, frigates cruisers and other ships, so it will give u a total buckload of 10-14B $$ and let me give u this straight 10 billion dollars will give u more than 100 rafale so think about it. I am not a critic so i have a recommendation also, so make a aircraft carrier island.

  • @Vikashsingh-pu7ln
    @Vikashsingh-pu7ln 3 года назад +12

    the aircraft carrier takes long time to build, if we approve it today then navy get his 3rd aircraft carrier almost 10 year later. 3rd aircraft carrier is a future needs of Indian navy, it'll be very helpful of India if it build with nuclear powered.
    The leader of India must think about it.

    • @shirinmimashangva1040
      @shirinmimashangva1040 3 года назад +1

      now that Kochin Shipyard Limited has many experience in ship building and now in aircraft carrier aswell, they said they can make it under 7 years if an order is given.

    • @Vikashsingh-pu7ln
      @Vikashsingh-pu7ln 3 года назад +1

      @@shirinmimashangva1040 I agree, but Kochi shipyard ltd said they can build iac-1 sister's ship in 7 years,
      The nuclear powered aircraft carrier is future needs, many upcoming project will be based on this type of carrier, we can say that navy wants flat top carrier not Skye jumped carrier.

  • @preethasudheesh9771
    @preethasudheesh9771 3 года назад +36

    Hey bro any update on Over The Horizon radar ❤
    I would love to hear the news about it 😀
    I have read your article on Over The Horizon radar
    It was very good
    And in that under timeline section
    It is mentioned that the implementation timeline is 6 weeks
    😀
    The update was given in somewhat around the mid of 15 and 20June
    It has been over 6 weeks now 😔 new update till now
    Why so?

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 года назад +13

      Proto implementation is complete and its in testing

    • @preethasudheesh9771
      @preethasudheesh9771 3 года назад +5

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi ok alpha

    • @preethasudheesh9771
      @preethasudheesh9771 3 года назад +6

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi btw can you share some information regarding the completion of prototype of Over The Horizon radar
      I mean it article or pictures

  • @VivekSingh-fb8vp
    @VivekSingh-fb8vp 3 года назад +1

    Bhai Japan, Spain, Turkey, Australia, Thailand ye sab LHD hai na ki carrier.
    F 35 ke chalte chutiyon ko showoff krne ka mauka mil gaya warna sab Helicopter hi use krte

  • @nikhilparmar5762
    @nikhilparmar5762 3 года назад +2

    Amazing knowledge

  • @arunkumarts8279
    @arunkumarts8279 3 года назад +6

    Pretty fair analysis.
    Keep up the good work bro😍💖💖🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 года назад +4

      Thank you so much 😀

    • @arunkumarts8279
      @arunkumarts8279 3 года назад

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi I should thank you for this wonderful analysis.😊
      Btw Welcome 😊

  • @meritoriousgamer
    @meritoriousgamer 3 года назад +1

    Because these Powers Read my comments regularly 😆

  • @Worldwildlife445
    @Worldwildlife445 3 года назад +1

    Japan ke pass aircraft carrier nahi balki helicopter carrier hai❤️❤️❤️

  • @onkarbhagawati1275
    @onkarbhagawati1275 3 года назад +4

    Very good analysis... I love your videos bro..... Keep it up... Jay hind

  • @garud321
    @garud321 3 года назад +3

    Ok... This video had some geostrategic information but we are expecting more from you 🤗🤗

  • @lucifergaming0702
    @lucifergaming0702 3 года назад +16

    Jai hind ❤️❤️

    • @lucifergaming0702
      @lucifergaming0702 3 года назад +1

      Want video on types of aircraft carrier ❤️

  • @warrior_1101
    @warrior_1101 3 года назад +2

    Alpha Defence and Defence Decode work for Goverment as Engineers and AIM is just a theory guy.
    If China and Europe can push for more Aircraft Carriers despite demographic collapse,then why not India?

  • @cassiedcosta
    @cassiedcosta 3 года назад +2

    Dude I love your sarcasm 😁😁

  • @tejasindianairforce3215
    @tejasindianairforce3215 3 года назад +3

    Nice explain 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻💙

  • @i_can_doit
    @i_can_doit 3 года назад +3

    Really u explain very well✌✌✌👍👍

  • @laughingbrick4824
    @laughingbrick4824 3 года назад +3

    We wasted $3 Billion on Afghanistan ...
    Can't we invest $3 Billion or more on a aircraft carrier with Catapult system ?
    I am utterly dissapointed ..

    • @hemanshu0503
      @hemanshu0503 3 года назад +3

      Claps for the unverified statements from this Pakistani Handle

    • @karanrathod2481
      @karanrathod2481 3 года назад

      @@hemanshu0503 wasted lol 😂

  • @JayantRaut
    @JayantRaut 3 года назад +1

    5:48 haan muze kuchh ni aata hai, agree karne ki bat to dur maine analysis dekha hi nahi pada hi nahi! isliye to aapke video dekhta hu! 😐😐😐😎

  • @thunderboltdaggers800
    @thunderboltdaggers800 3 года назад +1

    Bhai AC and LHD me farq to Jan lo. AC me helicopters v operate hote h matlab ye nhi ki ye LHD bana jayega. Sabhi ships ki apni catagory and definition hotihe. AC and LHD k operation , specifications, limitations alag alag h.
    Agar bolna h to bolo japanese LHD me VTOL aircraft F 35 operate kar sakte he.
    Ase to US v apne LHD me F 35 operate karte he to kya vo bolde ki hamare pas 11 nhi 21 AC h.
    Jo destroyer helicopter use karte h unhe kya ham LHD bulaenge.
    Bhai aap statement correct karo.
    Ase manipulate mat kia kro.

    • @thunderboltdaggers800
      @thunderboltdaggers800 3 года назад +1

      Again india jab 2 LHD purchase karega tab kya tum bologe ki india k paas 4 AC a gye h.

  • @kartikeswarbisoi5639
    @kartikeswarbisoi5639 3 года назад +1

    Nicely done..well script info

  • @thunderboltdaggers800
    @thunderboltdaggers800 3 года назад +1

    Japan, Australia and turkey ye sab LHD operate karenge na ki AC.
    dono ships different he. Statement clear kro.

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 года назад +1

      F35 operating from them ! Eg. Japaneese aircraft carrier can carry 28 F35 lightening II

  • @shivamkumarsingh7299
    @shivamkumarsingh7299 3 года назад +4

    Hey bro, do you have any update on what would happen to indian lhd programme,the future of indian lhd
    What if Cochin shipyard build lhd as they have gain expertise from ins Vikrant

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 года назад +6

      Yup ! makes sense
      But its stuck

    • @arunkumarts8279
      @arunkumarts8279 3 года назад

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi But again the problem is with STOVL aircraft right?
      We won't get F35B
      Even helicopters are also not there I guess.

    • @Sacrafago90
      @Sacrafago90 3 года назад

      @@arunkumarts8279 The solution is Russian Priboy E ,23900 class design with 40000 tonnes displacement,which also has options to install short range Catapults.
      Even if it is with Steam Catapults which can launch fighters & UAV,it worth it.
      Such ship would cost 1.25-1.5 billion dollars with Catapults for export customers with local manufacturing.
      A 40000 tons displacement ship with Catapults can easily launch 18-24 normal Marine fighters,so 2 such ships would have a fleet of 36-48 fighters along with 4-6 AEW & 12-16 Helicopters in total,thus considerably increasingly our Naval power.

  • @somnathsinhababu7642
    @somnathsinhababu7642 3 года назад

    INDIA needs bombers 1st...we dont have long range bombers like USA , RUSSIA CHINA.....we should go for bombers as soon as possible....

  • @anubhavraj7717
    @anubhavraj7717 3 года назад +1

    Because this is a moving army base.

  • @EsportsSchool
    @EsportsSchool 3 года назад +1

    4:50 ये नाम कैसे pronounce करना है... इसको लेकर की गई मेहनत ये तो भगवान और आप ही जानते हैं। 😲😲🤣🤣🤣
    5:02 किटी 🤣🤣🤣 इतनी खतरनाक चीज़ का इतना क्यूट नाम। 😅😅🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @rakeshthakur01
    @rakeshthakur01 3 года назад +1

    Your content are always good

  • @anujitganguly2029
    @anujitganguly2029 3 года назад +4

    Very well thought out video and that raises some points too , such what is going to be the new naval air wing consists of ? F/A 18, Mig 29Ks or N -LCA ?

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 года назад +3

      Mostly 29K

    • @anujitganguly2029
      @anujitganguly2029 3 года назад +1

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi but then it will increase the import and also not help the indigenous development.

  • @gaurav4211
    @gaurav4211 3 года назад +1

    Sir I know u don't agree with our view of not having a aircraft carrier. So let me tell u the problems
    - we don't have fund relatively
    - India don't have big opponent in Indian ocean.
    - we have 2 aircraft carriers already
    -We have islands in choke points from strait of malacca to Lakshadweep.
    - We don't have jets to have aircraft carrier, ya we have TEDBF bt they will also be replacing mig 29k after 8-10 yrs

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 года назад +4

      - How amortization work ? even if you are buying Gerald ford its just 1.1 billion $/ year. (We have that money).
      - For now ( You will see one Chineese carrier in Gwadar and another one entering IOR often).
      - We have 2 and none is flat top (I have discussed that multiple times why we need flat top.
      - Island can ever be an aircraft carrier talk to any Marcos and they will tell you why cant :)
      - Vishal will anyways take 10 years from here so you will have time to make your fighters :)

    • @gaurav4211
      @gaurav4211 3 года назад +1

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi
      I don't want to mess with the Alpha👑🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @riktimchowdhury5337
    @riktimchowdhury5337 3 года назад +1

    GOI should immediately approve a 45000 tonne AC with Catobar launched system. Nuclear or conventional doesn't matter. But it has to be delivered to Navy within 10 years. We can take help from France. When our economy grows we can develop a Nuclear powered super carriear as a replacement of INS Vikramaditya.. kya bolte ho dosto.

  • @Godofschool
    @Godofschool 3 года назад +1

    & some terrorist navy think of sinking aircraft carrier 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @yashvardhanojha6796
    @yashvardhanojha6796 3 года назад +3

    It's more about Showing that you have strength than actually punching the opposite guy that's why when it comes to power protection , submarines are of not much use.
    Great analysis alpha.

  • @EsportsSchool
    @EsportsSchool 3 года назад

    8:51 😍😍😍😍😍 आहा..... बॉम्बर लवर्स का पहला प्यार... लैंसर 😍😍😍
    ट्रांसफार्मर्स फ़िल्म का सीन याद आ गया
    "B1 snap 090 तुम्हें अपने 2000 lbs वाले JDAMM फेंकने की इजाज़त है!!!"
    💥💥💥💥💥 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @sanjayarauta2598
    @sanjayarauta2598 3 года назад +2

    Sir apke analysis one of best hai
    With defence decode
    This two RUclips channels are my favourite

  • @akshaygade8758
    @akshaygade8758 3 года назад

    Don't Know why CDS Is not understanding the Importance Of Aircraft Carriers !!!

  • @DrRajReddy
    @DrRajReddy 3 года назад

    u forgot to mention 9 amphibious ships of US Navy. (2 America Class and 7 Wasp Class ). They displace about 45,000 ton for America class and 40.5K ton for Wasp class.

  • @rashtrawad
    @rashtrawad 3 года назад

    मैं समझता हूँ कि aircraft कैरियर पर 70%aircrafts, 30% हेलिकॉप्टर होने चाहिए। व nearby naval bases पे ड्रोन deploy होने चाहिए। भारत के पास 4 aircraft कैरियर जरूर होने चाहिए।

  • @Beautiful_Earth_2718
    @Beautiful_Earth_2718 3 года назад

    Not only Indian Defence Planners or Think Tank, there r many Def strategist n all in comment section to whom ACs are Sitting Duck🤣🤣🤣🤣...
    Reasons they say hypersonic, supersonic, cruise missiles n all can easily down ACs...🤣🤣🤣
    Kuch Bhi...🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    If Downing an ACs r that easy than other countries should not have invested Funds for ACs...

  • @code_craft_0
    @code_craft_0 3 года назад

    America have 11 Aircraft carriers and 10 LHD as helicopter carriers. So if you counting Italian LHDs as Aircraft carriers so why not counting American LHDs. Italian LHDs are not much powerful.

  • @deepti3018
    @deepti3018 3 года назад

    Privatise Cochin shipyard Ltd along with HAL!!

  • @viper672
    @viper672 3 года назад

    I wish the pseudo defence experts stop squirting Anti carrier crap and atleast try to understand the rational of major navies investing heavily on carriers.
    My simple question to them is-
    ARE CHINA, USA OR UK FOOLS?

  • @hritabanroy9900
    @hritabanroy9900 3 года назад +3

    This video needs to go viral over internet...... Probably it will shut up those experts who are actually slowing the process of acquiring third aircraft carrier.

  • @laughingbrick4824
    @laughingbrick4824 3 года назад +9

    Meanwhile Indian govt. still thinking whether to have a 3rd aircraft carrier.
    No policy on Pakistan , No policy for Kashmir and Gilgit and ofcourse no policy for China. For 75 years we are just walking a unknown road without a map.

    • @user-jp9bg5zz5c
      @user-jp9bg5zz5c 3 года назад +1

      Really, Mr.Ajit Doval & EAM S. Jaishankar needs to take tutorial class on policy making from you

    • @naveenparashar764
      @naveenparashar764 3 года назад

      We are on track now.Indian Navy have to convince CDS & their demand approved.
      Next CDS may be from NAVY or Airforce.
      So we are moving toward consolidation of Power & distribution of responsibility

  • @coolkal7590
    @coolkal7590 3 года назад

    Russia is the most prudent Not wasting money on ACs Rather making AC destructor hypersonic missiles like Kinzhal & Zircon ACS will be obsolete by 2050 Moreover unlike US-NATO India doesn't need to fight wars thousands of miles away from it's shores What we need is plenty more submarines

  • @tagedge
    @tagedge 3 года назад

    एयरक्राफ्ट कैरियर के स्थान पर sea आइलैंड पर फोकस करना चाहिए।
    जैसे चीन ने बहुत सारे कृतिम आइलैंड बना दिए है

  • @mjs1398
    @mjs1398 3 года назад +1

    Bharat ko 50,000 Ton ke Nuclear powerd Catobar Aircraft Carrier ke liye planning karna chahiye. isse Bharat ko future mein 3 Aircraft Carrier ho jaye ga.
    Vikramaditya ko Arabian Sea par, Vikrant ko Bay of Bengal par aur 3rd Nuclear powerd Catobar Aircraft Carrier ko Indian Ocean par deploy kiya jaa sakta hai.

  • @harshitsoni3383
    @harshitsoni3383 3 года назад +7

    Bro
    you sarcasms are so smooth 🤣

  • @chandrakantsingh9174
    @chandrakantsingh9174 3 года назад +1

    Bro, I analysis everything, everything is quiet clear to my mind regarding future threats but a huge barrier is "make in India ". After so much hush push, they managed a carrier recently. Still testing. But for vast nation with super vast need, u have to think priority wise. Now we have support of Quad. They have most carriers. India has just one nuclear-powered sub, sub without nuc-powered is just a target in this hi-tech warfare era. So, Navy is huge investment zone but there's support, till then take Air Force to challenging height. UAV r about to come. After the deal, nuclear-powered subs & carriers with advance missile launcher & best jets. Say 3-4 yrs from now. This was my analysis about Southern Asian country named India.

  • @jiteshverma9589
    @jiteshverma9589 3 года назад

    You didn't count 10+ LHDs and LHAs of US navy. They are already carrying F35s!

  • @azadsingh4636
    @azadsingh4636 3 года назад +1

    Paisa kmane k liye

  • @SandeepKumar-qh3zs
    @SandeepKumar-qh3zs 3 года назад

    Don't underestimate pakistan. They have the capability to build carriers bigger than pluto and operate Naval variant of 10th gen Intergalactic fighter JF-17. The problem is the carrier too big for the enemies to handle

  • @khiorambagang6139
    @khiorambagang6139 Год назад

    We are proud of our indian naval force .But I pitch for a massive carrier to dominate the entire I
    Bay of Bengal region and flexing muscles upto south china sea. My view is that in place of INS Vishal it may be named as INS Brahmaputra to uphold the sentiments of Northeast India and to effectuate Act East policy of India ...Jai Hind

  • @syscgamer8933
    @syscgamer8933 3 года назад +1

    Can we convert
    our Vikrant aircraft carrier to a drone carrier it can carry only drones like aura bomber or mq 9 reaper drones 😅🤔I know it's illogical but still it makes sense

  • @CyrusInIndia
    @CyrusInIndia 3 года назад +1

    Actually USA has 20 carriers. 11 are supercarriers and rest are flattop amphibious helicopter type carriers or assault ships which are between 40 to 50 thousand tons displacement.

  • @AS-wx3pi
    @AS-wx3pi 3 года назад +2

    Bhai shiv aroor ki le RHA h🤣🤣😅😅😆😆

  • @PrashantRajput-zm9oy
    @PrashantRajput-zm9oy Год назад

    Really don't know why RUclips suggested me this video now...
    Btw will be happy to see if we get a revised video again on this when india has finally got it's second AC

  • @TheAbirindia
    @TheAbirindia 3 года назад

    I don't agree with you. USA always had 11 super carriers but they are also not sure if it's required. Their strength of smaller sea vessels have decreased a lot after ww2 as they have invested heavily in carriers.
    France carrier is 25 years old so it's Normal they will plan another. British navy has 2 and they planned it long back.
    Only navy which is obsessed with carrier is China and it's normal.
    I don't see in your video also that any other country is too busy to add big carriers in their navy...

  • @vasantnaik4723
    @vasantnaik4723 3 года назад

    Our froud burocracts who are on foreign pay roll breaks every best things .
    Hopefully our Modi govt do positive steps.

  • @rajs2659
    @rajs2659 3 года назад +1

    Correct. Without proper fighter jets people may joke at us.

  • @shubhamkumar1478
    @shubhamkumar1478 3 года назад +1

    Wow. Good analysis. Hope Government of India goes for Third aircraft carrier. If budget constraint just go for sister ship of ins Vikrant.

  • @marathi_manus467
    @marathi_manus467 3 года назад +1

    india should make islands in hindi occenas....it would be big but permanant investment and we can operate a huge militery group from island💯💯

  • @anuragnath4156
    @anuragnath4156 3 года назад +2

    5:07 - USA ke kity ke samne Thailand ka super kity 😂

  • @abhinayrangari9693
    @abhinayrangari9693 3 года назад +1

    Hme vikrant class ke carrier ko Australian navy ko offer karna chahiye.
    Log hmare pass nhi ayenge weapon khridne hme unke pass jana hoga jaise russia hme offer deta hai vaise hi.

  • @NIKHILMITTAL321
    @NIKHILMITTAL321 3 года назад +2

    Aircraft carrier and submarine both are important one is eye 👀 and other is ear 👂

  • @ugottabekiddingd1999
    @ugottabekiddingd1999 3 года назад

    Indian defence budget is 3rd largest bigger than russian why they have more tanks ships and planes? Hmm maybe because india has second biggest active and 1st biggest reserve force and paying them and their pensions might drain all our budget?

  • @glennlopez6772
    @glennlopez6772 3 года назад

    Suppose that the jobs will always be outdoors.
    Housing of staff will require less real estate.

  • @rohankumarbaraiya2574
    @rohankumarbaraiya2574 3 года назад +1

    India ko 3rd aircraft banana chahiye?

  • @divyeshchapanera
    @divyeshchapanera 3 года назад

    kya Indian Navy Ke Vikramaaditya Aircraft Carrier aur Ins Vikrant Aircraft Carrier supersonic Aur Hpersonic misile se Apne app ko protect kar sak ta hai USA Ne ek baar apni report me kaha tha ki Indian Aircraft Carrier Vikramaaditya me koi bhi Misile defence system installed nahi hai Jis se khud ko protect kar sake please ek baar ye subject per video banaye ga .6

  • @abhishekdev258
    @abhishekdev258 3 года назад +1

    Vikrant's airwing will be 12 Mig 29s plus 8 Naval LCA...True??

  • @dhruvadhruva8857
    @dhruvadhruva8857 3 года назад +1

    Alpha d if IAF was to attack Taliban what will its options with aircraft be make a video on that also

  • @yashvardhanojha6796
    @yashvardhanojha6796 3 года назад

    Maine ek Russian channel se suna tha ki , US aircraft carriers are useless and are sitting ducks, quorab pr article bhi padha ab ek Indian RUclipsr kh rha ye galat hai .
    Why should i trust an Indian RUclipsr, koi white skinned non us wala ya koi communist khe to Mai Manu .

  • @abirbo
    @abirbo 3 года назад +1

    Why doesn't Japan construct a ship whose firepower would be comparable to the the Ticonderoga class and name it Yamato?

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 года назад +1

      Constitutional stuff

    • @abirbo
      @abirbo 3 года назад

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi You mean Japan isn't allowed to have a ship of such firepower, as per the constitution?

    • @vaibhavtiwari7611
      @vaibhavtiwari7611 2 года назад +1

      @@abirbo yes due to world war 2 they acquire only defencive weapon

  • @deepakmajhi5205
    @deepakmajhi5205 3 года назад +2

    5:31 😂😂😂
    Here we gooooooo... Ultimate roast😂

  • @kaushalnagwanshi2298
    @kaushalnagwanshi2298 3 года назад

    USA ki Navy ak taraf = remaining countries ki Navy dusari taraf bol rhe ho video me .........fir Chinese Navy ko world no. 1 Navy kis wajah se khate hai........

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 года назад +1

      They aren't !! They aren't even wort more than 2 - 3 Nimitz CBG forget Ford

  • @abhinavsharma5274
    @abhinavsharma5274 3 года назад +1

    I totally agree with you that Submarine and Aircraft carrier have different role and no one can replace other one. If India want to be blue water navy then we need at least 3-4 aircraft carriers and 4-6 LHDs plus 12-18 nuclear submarines.
    Although Pakistan navy is not a threat today but they are trying to build with help of China, considering 10 years of Pakistani navy from now, we must plan and work before they poses threat to us.

  • @diecastworld7962
    @diecastworld7962 2 года назад

    Guess the best aircraft carrier it is Admiral Kuznetsov because it takes very good care of its crew by getting back over and over to maintenance docks so that crew can go to their homes and relax and feel relieved of not being in the best rusting carrier and be safe lol 🤣

  • @harpreetturka9730
    @harpreetturka9730 3 года назад

    India need aircraft's at large scale too to complete aircraft carriers requirement which we are lacking by not making own naval jets

  • @anmolbali4640
    @anmolbali4640 3 года назад +1

    India 🇮🇳 should too start its focusing on our own LHD's in good number... Our third Aircraft carrier should be CATOBAR-Nuclear Powered Ship and 3 Aircraft carrier can be complimented with at least 5-7 LHD's Nuclear Powered and our UAV's and Naval CATs system can operate from these LHD's and boost our Power.

    • @siddharth4277
      @siddharth4277 3 года назад +1

      The original plan was to have 3 AC and 4LHD so one LHD with each AC while one goes for maintenance.. but now the navy is most likely to go for 2LHD now and a third AC and might go for another 2 LHD as follow on after the delivery of first 2...

  • @sauravghosh7064
    @sauravghosh7064 3 года назад

    While subs ek attack unit hai
    Like special forces jo chupke se jata hai
    Aur counterterrorism mission karte hai aur wapas ajate hai
    But jis tarah area capture sirf conventional army se kiya ja sakta hai waise hi koi sea/ocean body bhi sirf conventional Aircraft carrier,destroyer ya fridget se control kiya ja sakta hai ,
    Submarine ye nahi kar sakte

  • @WiggleDraggy
    @WiggleDraggy 3 года назад +3

    Even if the navy cannot afford a 65k ton aircraft they should atleast go for another 45k ton carrier like vikrant Cochin shipyard already said they can make a similar carrier like Vikrant in 7 years and that would be a good option to have 3 carriers operation at all times plus after that if our economy by the time the 3rd carrier is operation is improved we can than order a construction of a 65k nuclear-powered carrier to replace our INS vikramaditya

    • @riktimchowdhury5337
      @riktimchowdhury5337 3 года назад

      But the 3rd AC should be a Catobar launched one.. otherwise it can't operate large fixed wing AWACS.

    • @WiggleDraggy
      @WiggleDraggy 3 года назад

      @@riktimchowdhury5337 Idk if operating a large fixed wing from a 45k ton carrier would make sense as it would take a looot of space but yea for emergency uses a catobar launcher would be better

    • @riktimchowdhury5337
      @riktimchowdhury5337 3 года назад

      @@WiggleDraggy France aircraft carrier with a displacement of 42000 tonne carries fixed wing AWACS. It is very necessary.

    • @WiggleDraggy
      @WiggleDraggy 3 года назад +1

      @@riktimchowdhury5337 Aah didn't knew that but France aircraft carrier is nuclear-powered so the size of their catapult is smaller than one which would be operated by a non nuclear one so idk if a 45k ton will be able to carry a lot of fighters if we get awacs.

  • @MOHDSHAHID-fy9ig
    @MOHDSHAHID-fy9ig 3 года назад +1

    India helicopter carrier pe work chal raha hai. Please es pe bhi video banaye ya banane ka plane hai 4 heli carrier

  • @deepti3018
    @deepti3018 3 года назад

    IAC2 should be nuclear powered!