I questioned the same thing... You can find many arguments on forums about what's the better zero, what's the better bullet weight or what the best configuration. Yet no one bothered making a video about it. Until now
No surprises here, the ballistic data just confirms that math doesn't lie. Thank you for the illustration of the concept, I'm sure it helped a lot of folks have a better understand.
I stumbled on this channel a couple of weeks ago. These videos are pure gold. It's like the video selections are from my wish list of knowledge. Thank you!
Most of us use M193 for practice, and most late-manufactured barrels have a 1:7 twist -- which is FAR faster than M193 requires (original M16 had a 1:12 twist). I'm interested in the effect of 1:7 twist on M193 bullet travel -- especially as it gets out to longer ranges.
My only experience with the 1 in 7 twist is with the the 20" barrel on an A2. The answer to you question is from my experiance is that the M193 is very stable in the 1 in 7 and if the wind cooperates my A2 can make repeatable 600 yard hits.
He has done a video on a 25/300, 50/200 and 100 yd zero. From zero to 200 a 50 yard zero is pretty consistent, but once you reach out past 200 the bullet drop is significant.
Love the no-nonsense videos man! Straight to the point and very informative. In a future video I’d like to see a comparison on barrel twist rate vs. bullet weight. There’s a lot of charts out there regarding this, but I haven’t seen any videos with real world shooting data.
The M193 does even better with the 20" barrel on the A2. My A2 in 5.56 in a Delta configuration is almost as good as my Aero Precision M4E1 in 6MM ARC with a 16" barrel and 105 grain Hornady match.
@@davidmilisock5200Makes sense. Cartridge was made for that length. Had only been shooting green tips from the carbine, but is way to cold for outdoor range and they say no no to those indoors. So a vid about non green tips and perhaps insight into 11.5 and 20 inches would be good.
I love these vids. Sometimes as instructors we don’t always have the right cues or eloquence to reach every student (everyone learns differently) and in those cases I’ve found that showing them these vids makes it “click”
I really Enjoy your Videos! You Cover Lots of Information! I’ve always been a Fan of 36 Yard Zero. Pretty much Translates into Three Inches High at 100 Yards. Growing Up in South Dakota, I Sighted in most of my rifles at 3 Inches High at 100 Yards. I’m 63 Years old now and a Marine Veteran. Thanks Again! Love watching your Videos!
We love your videos. You're saving us all alot of time and ammo by SHOWING us what's going on with all 3 bullets. Not just telling us. You do a great job at explaining what you're talking about. We love your channel and keep up the good work. God bless you and yours and God bless America 🇺🇸.
Not really. It is simply a matter of degrees. A shorter bbl isn't going to produce more velocity, right? So we can expect greater bullet fall and more wind- induced drift. It all comes back to velocity.
I pushed a quarter size hole straight threw 70 lb hog at 70 yards with razor core 77 otm it amazing how much of the shoulder on exit side was damaged .
You are doing such great work! This has fast become my favorite gun channel. Highly informative and relatable. I do envy those wide Open spaces and Long ranges you get to shoot.
Just started coming across your videos. Man thank you for keeping it simple. As a new shooter to this platform, I greatly appreciate the easy to understand approach. Please keep up the great work.
I’ve been shooting for 40 years and didn’t know these fundamentals. I always just liked guns and shooting. I’ve never owned a good scope but i now have a scope but it’s only a strike eagle gen 2 on a 14.5” pinned chf. Thanks for doing these videos.
That guy cannot make ammo fast enough lol. Needs expensive machinery. Props to him though for doing what I wish I could do. I want to build a browning blr mini action for the arc
I'm wanting to build a 14" 6mm arc for a truck gun. I've heard good things about the caliber at that barrel length, but would still like to see a video in this format and the others he's been doing on this topic, with that barrel length and caliber. Especially with the 3 offerings that Hornady has right now on it.
I watched this video and one other video on all the stuff you accomplished here. I can't remember what the definitive nature was with the calibers and such on the other video but I just remembered that it along with this one is so helpful. I wonder if you've ever done a 6.5 Creedmoor and a 308 like you did here with the 556. If you've already done it please shoot me back a reference and I'll watch that video but love what you do. Great job especially for someone like me who's not as versed in all this. Helps me gain knowledge out of real practical level. So good. Thank you my friend
Dude, your videos are just the best. Super practical and you're obviously a really smart guy but you don't insult your audience and show it off. There's so much banter on the internet about this cartridge in that cartridge being better, but if you want to know what a cartridge does just play with a ballistic calculator. There's no best cartridge, just a bunch of trade-offs and you have to figure out what's best or what you want to do.
So now I'm GLAD (again) that I have mostly M193 55 grain. I was starting to think about switching to something heavier since some say heavy equals accurate, but your practical test kind of says otherwise. Thanks!
keep in mind of the zero he's using, for the heavier bullets in a long rifle you'd want to probably use a farther zero like 50/200 instead of the 36 zero.. it all depends on the usage
Nice to see the 1:7 twist was not a detriment to the 55gr at all. Great to see that physics haven't changed and that a 14" barrel doesn't give the heavier bullets enough velocity to be as good at 300 yards bullet drop wise. Seeing the limits of that system, no magic bullet for shorter barrels in 5.56. Is what it is. Also confirmed that the m855 sucks accuracy wise, I'm not alone. You do seem to take our comments and use them so now I'd like to request and see this run with a proper 5.56 barrel length of 16" or even the original stoner length of 20" that the system was originally designed with for the 55gr vs heavier. I'd also love to see similar work done with the 6mm arc which I am coming to believe is a superior battle caliber for the AR15 over 5.56. Thanks so much!!
@@seanoneil277 The M855 was designed for better penetration from the shorter barreled M4. It runs at higher pressure than the M193, therefore produces higher velocity in the shorte barrels and has a steel wire core.
@@davidmilisock5200I had questions about that. FFL always seemed to have a can of Winchester M855. I read of an EPR or M855A1 for the Carbines, which seemed to imply 855 is for the 20". Well this EPR allegedly has faster burning powder for the shorter barrel. Faster burn equals more pressure, but complete burn in 14 inches. I told him, I'll have that. He says nope, civilians may not have that. Bolt breakage, or something. I don't know.
@@Driver-ur9mf The M855 (green tip) came to be when the M4 was in general use for a while. The M855A1 (from what I could find) does have a higher pressure, however the one issue that seems to reappear itself is feed ramp wear since the M855A1 has the steel tip on the outside. If my memory is working, they created a different magazine for that cartridge.
Another great video. You have no idea how these videos help people who dont have availability and or access to longer shooting ranges. I like seeing the heavier 5.56/223 bullet info they are becoming more popular and available. Perhaps a video showing a 77 grain bullet zeroed at 25 yards , 50 yards and 100 yards and the results of those zeros at 300 yards.
@@IkfNorCalChamp yes they seem to have been not very accurate at the distance he shot but next time you go out & shoot them say at 700 yds you will see that they will shoot better than the 55g fmj’s or 62g , at least that’s what I see in my rigs because of the higher bc of the 77g . Your rifle will ultimately tell you if it likes them or not .
Great series idea, this is good stuff! I was very surprised by the 62gr performance at 300y (wide disbursement)., as well as the amount of drop (13 inches) of the 77gr from 200-300yds. I wasn’t expecting the 77gr to be higher at 200y than the lighter bullets but that amount of drop was crazy! Makes me wonder if the shorter barrel length contributed to that drop. In addition to optic height, muzzle devices, and barrel lengths, I’d love to see barrel twist rates with different bullet weights added to the list because I’ve read how a 1:9 won’t stabilize a 77gr down range and how 1:8 is the perfect all around compromise, etc.
@@greatcornholio5541M&P had a sport 2 with 1 in 8, saying it offers better stability. FFL said you can do better than that package. Perhaps. The 6920 has 1 in 7, chrome lined blah blah blah MP whatever, does fine w/green tips. I think, as that is all I fed it.
Great Job on these videos. I love how you tell us about the Gun and setup, what ammunition, explain trajectory theory, and then announce each group of shots before they occur. Without this we are just looking at another video of bullet strikes in a go pro. We know it is 50 yd zero, 100 yard shot etc... I and people that I shoot with refer back to your wrap-ups over and over so we can get it right the first time and not waste expensive ammunition verifying our equipment. I have never been able to get people to understand on the first try and you do it every time. God Bless you. I notice you often refer to what your ballistic calculator says and you are verifying it with your equipment. I am a re-loader and like many have nearly no way to verify a 200 yard shot. Perhaps you could show us how to run the numbers on a ballistic calculator and then verify on a 100 or less range the information from our gun with inches high at 100 and so on. I think this would be very practical for nearly everyone that lives in more urban areas that can never get long shots. Just a suggestion Keep up the good work. I bet you are making a greater contribution to the shooting community than even YOU know. Having spent much time on the range I realize this type education takes much effort to produce. keep up the good work, we'll be watching.
Bro, I just found you, and this is some of the best content out there. I've been desperately trying to find zeros for my suppressed 11.5 and 12.5 that I solely run 75/77gr. I have a suppressed 16" and run 55gr because it's easy with my bdc optics. However, trying to figure out holds, zeros, etc, when mixing ammo, get confusing. Unfortunately, I only have a 100yd range. I'm actually looking at property solely to shoot distance and make a training ground on.
Awesome video bro. I personally don’t like using 55 grain ammo. I could never get a good group. I have a 16” 1/7 twist barrel on my range rifle. And it seems to favor 62 grain more than anything. I’ve shot heavier loads & I wish I could shoot more of it to work the barrel in more but man that stuff is kinda expensive. So if I buy anything over 62 grains it usually goes to storage.
Love the video man, one of the most underrated channels on RUclips. I'm curious to hear your thoughts on a 42yd 300 zero with a 16in upper running 55gr 5.56 with a height over bore of 2.79in, ran it through a ballistic table and it was only +3.5in over point of aim at 150yds and a drop of -2.85in below point of aim at 300yds.
These videos always interest me because I use to zero mine at 100 which is difficult with my old eyes. I use mine for hunting so I use to zero at 100 yds, but switched to the 36 a while back. Now I’m switching bullets to a 70 grain and know about what I can expect.
I was literally just deciphering this in my mind 2 minutes ago because of an optic I have coming which is set up for 62g reticle. Griffin armament 1x8 Thanks man!
More videos need to be like, RL testing. Very practical. Have you ever tested another type of 0ing other than what is commonly used to see if there is a better grouping at the 25, 50, 100, 200, and 300 yards
Awesome video. You are exploring the concept of maximum point blank range in the common vernacular. Looks like all would work just fine on a fairly large target to 300. I prefer 77s personally.
I was kinda surprised at the 100yd group out of the 55gr. It was tighter than i thought it would be out of a 1/7 twist barrel. Thanks for the info. Cheers
Another great video. I'd be curious about the velocities at 300 yards, to calculate the terminal ballistics and energy on target. I get the best accuracy with 77g, but this video makes me think that 55g might be as good or better, if it can still get the job done.
Great video! I found that the 5.56 cartridge performs much better for varmints with lighter projectiles. The increased velocity reduces the time of flight, offsetting the increased ballistic coefficient of the heavier projectile. As far an AR gas gun combat sight in, I use 50 yards.
Awesome video!! Next time you do these. You should use different color tape for each bullet weight. Or if your doing different things. It will really show it better. And use wider cardboard so you don't shoot off target.
I’d absolutely love see this same testing n 7.6whew….especially from a 16” 1/10”….but you’ve got my 5.56 juices goin so I’m gonna fire my ol carbine range model with the compass in the stock rn….lokk out black Bart!
none of these groups are on the orange target dot at any of the 3 ranges, which is why I prefer the 50/200 yard zero, you'll be slightly high at 100 yd on target @ 200 yd and about 8-10 inches low @ 300yd with the 50/200yd zero.
From a military aspect, you really can't beat a 200y zero for engagements in a predominantly urban enviroment (or for civilian use as home protection either). Depends what your expected engagements might be. One of my "5.56" rifles is an 18" Wylde used mostly for prairie dog sometimes out to 450-500y. That one is def a 300 zero and works best with 77gr.
Great content!!! I’m looking forward to the different height over bore scenarios since I have a HELION that has a very high heigh over bore. It would also be interesting to note which bullet types have better groupings. I have been under the impression that Frontier 62 and 77 gr bullets that are BTHP bullets have better groupings because of the design of the bullets.
Fantastic as always! Also a bit interesting to see the wind impact on the different bullet weights. I'm also curious about the POI shift between the same type of ammunition made by different manufacturers. For example, how much difference would you see at 50/100/200/300 yards between 55 grain 556 made by Federal vs IMI vs Hornady vs PMC, etc.
These videos are fantastic! I would love to see a video of a 36yd zero with different grain weights but keeping the original zero to see point of impact shift. Say 77gr 36yd zero and shoot 55 and 62 with the zero for 77 and see how they compare
These videos are so practical!!! Why is no one else doing this???? You deserve millions of subscribers!
Couldn’t said it better…this should be a college course prerequisite in merica..🇺🇸
Agreed. These are the types of videos that are truly helpful and really explain all of these ideas.
You might like Jim's Goon Life. It's not quiet as data heavy but it's good too.
I questioned the same thing... You can find many arguments on forums about what's the better zero, what's the better bullet weight or what the best configuration. Yet no one bothered making a video about it. Until now
Homie is like the Paul Harrel for the new generation.
Needs a more iconic hat.
These things have to happen naturally. The perfect hat will come in due time
Very good company
No surprises here, the ballistic data just confirms that math doesn't lie. Thank you for the illustration of the concept, I'm sure it helped a lot of folks have a better understand.
I stumbled on this channel a couple of weeks ago. These videos are pure gold. It's like the video selections are from my wish list of knowledge. Thank you!
Found him because 300blk subsonic, stayed for everything thing else.
Number crunching on the computer is great, but real world data is so much more useful which is what makes videos like this so good.
Most of us use M193 for practice, and most late-manufactured barrels have a 1:7 twist -- which is FAR faster than M193 requires (original M16 had a 1:12 twist). I'm interested in the effect of 1:7 twist on M193 bullet travel -- especially as it gets out to longer ranges.
My only experience with the 1 in 7 twist is with the the 20" barrel on an A2. The answer to you question is from my experiance is that the M193 is very stable in the 1 in 7 and if the wind cooperates my A2 can make repeatable 600 yard hits.
@@davidmilisock5200☝️this
No one test ammo more than ally. Your channel and them guys together is a match made in heaven
Would love to see this on a 50/200 yard zero. Great video as always.
seems he has no idea on what works does he ..
I think the differences of weights are more pronounced at 36/300 than 50/200 (but yes I believe 50/200 is flatter and superior)
He has done a video on a 25/300, 50/200 and 100 yd zero. From zero to 200 a 50 yard zero is pretty consistent, but once you reach out past 200 the bullet drop is significant.
@@blahblahblah7554 He did the tests and 36yd zero was better. 36/300 yd zero is superior.
@@nickadkins7765 depends.. if you’re looking to be a surgical shooter, 50 is the way to go. If you wanna make hits at 300/400 then 36 is superior
I know how much time, energy, and $$ these videos take! Thanks for providing quality info for the everyday shooter!
Love the no-nonsense videos man! Straight to the point and very informative.
In a future video I’d like to see a comparison on barrel twist rate vs. bullet weight. There’s a lot of charts out there regarding this, but I haven’t seen any videos with real world shooting data.
Great idea. Especially if he did 5.56 and another one like .308.
I'm impressed with the performance of the 55 grain bullets.
The M193 does even better with the 20" barrel on the A2. My A2 in 5.56 in a Delta configuration is almost as good as my Aero Precision M4E1 in 6MM ARC with a 16" barrel and 105 grain Hornady match.
@@davidmilisock5200Makes sense. Cartridge was made for that length. Had only been shooting green tips from the carbine, but is way to cold for outdoor range and they say no no to those indoors.
So a vid about non green tips and perhaps insight into 11.5 and 20 inches would be good.
@@Driver-ur9mfI’m pretty sure PSA makes 62gr AAC ammo in regular ball, also probably PMC X-TAC
@@trentmckenzie343 thanks 👍 for the input.
I love these vids. Sometimes as instructors we don’t always have the right cues or eloquence to reach every student (everyone learns differently) and in those cases I’ve found that showing them these vids makes it “click”
Dude this has been a great series
Really glad to hear you’re enjoying it! Appreciate the support!
Thanks!
Doing God's work thank you for your time & effort & thoroughness of your content
I really Enjoy your Videos!
You Cover Lots of Information!
I’ve always been a Fan of 36 Yard Zero.
Pretty much Translates into Three Inches High at 100 Yards.
Growing Up in South Dakota, I Sighted in most of my rifles at 3 Inches High at 100 Yards.
I’m 63 Years old now and a Marine Veteran.
Thanks Again!
Love watching your Videos!
We love your videos. You're saving us all alot of time and ammo by SHOWING us what's going on with all 3 bullets. Not just telling us. You do a great job at explaining what you're talking about. We love your channel and keep up the good work.
God bless you and yours and God bless America 🇺🇸.
Same tests but with your 11.5 would be great also
Not really. It is simply a matter of degrees. A shorter bbl isn't going to produce more velocity, right? So we can expect greater bullet fall and more wind- induced drift. It all comes back to velocity.
The video I’ve been waiting for thank you good sir!
This is honestly some of the best firearm content on RUclips. Keep up the great work!
Really appreciate the kind words! Hope you’ll stay tuned to check out my new content!
You have done an excellent job answering the deep dive questions I've had pertaining to balistic variables. Thanks so much, excellent content
Is like going to class. Whip out the notebook and a pen. Focus, this guy drops knowledge.
Good video. I run 77gr IMI Razorcore. That ammo hits pretty hard and shoots great.
I pushed a quarter size hole straight threw 70 lb hog at 70 yards with razor core 77 otm it amazing how much of the shoulder on exit side was damaged .
Dude should have thousands more subscribers! You make everything so intuitive. Great work!
Thanks! Really appreciate the kind words…. Do me a solid and share my channel with your buddies!
You are doing such great work! This has fast become my favorite gun channel. Highly informative and relatable. I do envy those wide Open spaces and Long ranges you get to shoot.
Really enjoyed this series
Just started coming across your videos. Man thank you for keeping it simple. As a new shooter to this platform, I greatly appreciate the easy to understand approach. Please keep up the great work.
Great info! Always nice to see some actual shots being taken!
Always informative and your show me way of teaching is a neat way to learn
Been a subscriber for some time now and I love your channel. Thank you for the great content!
So awesome that you're doing this series! Literally what I commented about last week lol
I’ve been shooting for 40 years and didn’t know these fundamentals. I always just liked guns and shooting. I’ve never owned a good scope but i now have a scope but it’s only a strike eagle gen 2 on a 14.5” pinned chf. Thanks for doing these videos.
Great presentation of commonly used bullets. Shows people the outcomes of what to expect.
Great info !
It went as expected but great to see it all at once.
Considering your ties with Wade and Ally Munitions, I would love to see these tests done in 6mm ARC.
That guy cannot make ammo fast enough lol. Needs expensive machinery. Props to him though for doing what I wish I could do. I want to build a browning blr mini action for the arc
I would like to see that as well
I'm wanting to build a 14" 6mm arc for a truck gun. I've heard good things about the caliber at that barrel length, but would still like to see a video in this format and the others he's been doing on this topic, with that barrel length and caliber. Especially with the 3 offerings that Hornady has right now on it.
Another great video! Informative data.. 😎 👍🏻👍🏻
I watched this video and one other video on all the stuff you accomplished here. I can't remember what the definitive nature was with the calibers and such on the other video but I just remembered that it along with this one is so helpful. I wonder if you've ever done a 6.5 Creedmoor and a 308 like you did here with the 556. If you've already done it please shoot me back a reference and I'll watch that video but love what you do. Great job especially for someone like me who's not as versed in all this. Helps me gain knowledge out of real practical level. So good. Thank you my friend
This video is great. I understand you're busy, and I wish you continued growth in the future.
Dude, your videos are just the best. Super practical and you're obviously a really smart guy but you don't insult your audience and show it off. There's so much banter on the internet about this cartridge in that cartridge being better, but if you want to know what a cartridge does just play with a ballistic calculator. There's no best cartridge, just a bunch of trade-offs and you have to figure out what's best or what you want to do.
So now I'm GLAD (again) that I have mostly M193 55 grain. I was starting to think about switching to something heavier since some say heavy equals accurate, but your practical test kind of says otherwise. Thanks!
keep in mind of the zero he's using, for the heavier bullets in a long rifle you'd want to probably use a farther zero like 50/200 instead of the 36 zero.. it all depends on the usage
Nice to see the 1:7 twist was not a detriment to the 55gr at all. Great to see that physics haven't changed and that a 14" barrel doesn't give the heavier bullets enough velocity to be as good at 300 yards bullet drop wise. Seeing the limits of that system, no magic bullet for shorter barrels in 5.56. Is what it is. Also confirmed that the m855 sucks accuracy wise, I'm not alone. You do seem to take our comments and use them so now I'd like to request and see this run with a proper 5.56 barrel length of 16" or even the original stoner length of 20" that the system was originally designed with for the 55gr vs heavier. I'd also love to see similar work done with the 6mm arc which I am coming to believe is a superior battle caliber for the AR15 over 5.56. Thanks so much!!
M855 seems best suited to learning recoil etc. management in fundamentals, more than anything else.
@@seanoneil277 The M855 was designed for better penetration from the shorter barreled M4. It runs at higher pressure than the M193, therefore produces higher velocity in the shorte barrels and has a steel wire core.
@@davidmilisock5200I had questions about that. FFL always seemed to have a can of Winchester M855. I read of an EPR or M855A1 for the Carbines, which seemed to imply 855 is for the 20".
Well this EPR allegedly has faster burning powder for the shorter barrel. Faster burn equals more pressure, but complete burn in 14 inches.
I told him, I'll have that. He says nope, civilians may not have that. Bolt breakage, or something. I don't know.
@@Driver-ur9mf The M855 (green tip) came to be when the M4 was in general use for a while. The M855A1 (from what I could find) does have a higher pressure, however the one issue that seems to reappear itself is feed ramp wear since the M855A1 has the steel tip on the outside. If my memory is working, they created a different magazine for that cartridge.
Bro you spoiled the ending for me
Interesting, informative and well presented video 👍
55 grain always punches above its weight. M855 always disappoints.
People always say m855 is super spicy and accurate ammo, and i love proving them wrong everytime
I use M855 for SHTF ammo .M193 is good for speeds and more accuracy and 77 for hunting deers and hogs.🙂
your videos are impressively informative and very well done!
Just getting into the AR rifles and your videos are an amazing help, thank you!
Man, your videos are great. Thanks for posting.
Love your stuff man, keep up the great work!
Excellent comparison.
This is another outstanding video in the series. Thank you.
High quality content.
Keep up the great work!
Very valuable info. Thanks for sharing.
This series of videos is such great content. Thanks for what you are doing. Good stuff!!
You truly do an amazing job with these videos thanks and would love to see some more silencer stuff
Another outstanding vid. Thank you for making these.
Another great video. You have no idea how these videos help people who dont have availability and or access to longer shooting ranges. I like seeing the heavier 5.56/223 bullet info they are becoming more popular and available. Perhaps a video showing a 77 grain bullet zeroed at 25 yards , 50 yards and 100 yards and the results of those zeros at 300 yards.
Those 77grainers are definitely the ticket further out past 300yds …..great info & content keep up the awesome work mullet man 🤘🏾
Yea man…got some 85gr nosler rdf the super extra pointy version…
Didn’t they do the worst tho? I bought a bunch of 77gr to for self defense rounds. But they didn’t look super accurate from this video.
@@IkfNorCalChamp yes they seem to have been not very accurate at the distance he shot but next time you go out & shoot them say at 700 yds you will see that they will shoot better than the 55g fmj’s or 62g , at least that’s what I see in my rigs because of the higher bc of the 77g . Your rifle will ultimately tell you if it likes them or not .
Phenomenal explanation. You deserve a lot more subs than you have.
Great series idea, this is good stuff! I was very surprised by the 62gr performance at 300y (wide disbursement)., as well as the amount of drop (13 inches) of the 77gr from 200-300yds. I wasn’t expecting the 77gr to be higher at 200y than the lighter bullets but that amount of drop was crazy! Makes me wonder if the shorter barrel length contributed to that drop. In addition to optic height, muzzle devices, and barrel lengths, I’d love to see barrel twist rates with different bullet weights added to the list because I’ve read how a 1:9 won’t stabilize a 77gr down range and how 1:8 is the perfect all around compromise, etc.
I’ve got a 18” .223wylde barrel and it’s got 1:8 twist. It shoots almost everything great.
@@greatcornholio5541M&P had a sport 2 with 1 in 8, saying it offers better stability. FFL said you can do better than that package. Perhaps. The 6920 has 1 in 7, chrome lined blah blah blah MP whatever, does fine w/green tips. I think, as that is all I fed it.
Another subject I was wondering about between the bullet weights and their impact. Your doing a great job here too! Subscribed a few days ago.
Great Job on these videos. I love how you tell us about the Gun and setup, what ammunition, explain trajectory theory, and then announce each group of shots before they occur. Without this we are just looking at another video of bullet strikes in a go pro. We know it is 50 yd zero, 100 yard shot etc... I and people that I shoot with refer back to your wrap-ups over and over so we can get it right the first time and not waste expensive ammunition verifying our equipment. I have never been able to get people to understand on the first try and you do it every time. God Bless you.
I notice you often refer to what your ballistic calculator says and you are verifying it with your equipment. I am a re-loader and like many have nearly no way to verify a 200 yard shot. Perhaps you could show us how to run the numbers on a ballistic calculator and then verify on a 100 or less range the information from our gun with inches high at 100 and so on. I think this would be very practical for nearly everyone that lives in more urban areas that can never get long shots. Just a suggestion
Keep up the good work. I bet you are making a greater contribution to the shooting community than even YOU know. Having spent much time on the range I realize this type education takes much effort to produce. keep up the good work, we'll be watching.
Great work, I really appreciate your videos. Keep at it!
Love these kinds of videos! Super informative!!!
Bro, I just found you, and this is some of the best content out there. I've been desperately trying to find zeros for my suppressed 11.5 and 12.5 that I solely run 75/77gr. I have a suppressed 16" and run 55gr because it's easy with my bdc optics. However, trying to figure out holds, zeros, etc, when mixing ammo, get confusing. Unfortunately, I only have a 100yd range. I'm actually looking at property solely to shoot distance and make a training ground on.
Absolutely enjoy this series of videos. Thank you, Aloha 🤙🏽
For the algorithm
Your channel kicks ass bro
Another video giving the best info on this topic
Great videos man. Keep up the good work!
Awesome video bro. I personally don’t like using 55 grain ammo. I could never get a good group. I have a 16” 1/7 twist barrel on my range rifle. And it seems to favor 62 grain more than anything. I’ve shot heavier loads & I wish I could shoot more of it to work the barrel in more but man that stuff is kinda expensive. So if I buy anything over 62 grains it usually goes to storage.
Id like to see this with a 1/8 twist barrel. See if theres an appreciable difference
The bullet weight didn’t seem to make that big of a difference but it’s still noticeable
Love the straight forward info. Ever do anything for 9 mm pistols im here for it.
Love the video man, one of the most underrated channels on RUclips. I'm curious to hear your thoughts on a 42yd 300 zero with a 16in upper running 55gr 5.56 with a height over bore of 2.79in, ran it through a ballistic table and it was only +3.5in over point of aim at 150yds and a drop of -2.85in below point of aim at 300yds.
I’m digging the mullet videos, too! What calculator are you using?
Bro you are just crankin out the content!
Get 3 different colored dots in your next test if you have 3 different bullets
These videos always interest me because I use to zero mine at 100 which is difficult with my old eyes. I use mine for hunting so I use to zero at 100 yds, but switched to the 36 a while back. Now I’m switching bullets to a 70 grain and know about what I can expect.
Love the channel and these videos. Glad I found you. Subbed!
Bullet weight are given, but velocities information would've been nice because these effect your bullet drop over the varying distances.
I was literally just deciphering this in my mind 2 minutes ago because of an optic I have coming which is set up for 62g reticle. Griffin armament 1x8
Thanks man!
More videos need to be like, RL testing. Very practical. Have you ever tested another type of 0ing other than what is commonly used to see if there is a better grouping at the 25, 50, 100, 200, and 300 yards
Awesome video. You are exploring the concept of maximum point blank range in the common vernacular. Looks like all would work just fine on a fairly large target to 300. I prefer 77s personally.
I was kinda surprised at the 100yd group out of the 55gr. It was tighter than i thought it would be out of a 1/7 twist barrel. Thanks for the info. Cheers
Another great video. I'd be curious about the velocities at 300 yards, to calculate the terminal ballistics and energy on target. I get the best accuracy with 77g, but this video makes me think that 55g might be as good or better, if it can still get the job done.
well 55gr will cerainly be a lot cheaper to run and train.
@@cosmoch Definitely.
Great video! I found that the 5.56 cartridge performs much better for varmints with lighter projectiles. The increased velocity reduces the time of flight, offsetting the increased ballistic coefficient of the heavier projectile.
As far an AR gas gun combat sight in, I use 50 yards.
Another great video! Well thought out, data was expressed in a non confusing manor. I wonder, did you chrono the ammo selected for this video?
The bullet trajectory is initially sort of flat then turns upward (defying gravity) before its flight path falls onto the arc trend.
Matches my experience. Great vid.
Thanks for the data! Great info to share.
Awesome video!! Next time you do these. You should use different color tape for each bullet weight. Or if your doing different things. It will really show it better. And use wider cardboard so you don't shoot off target.
I’d absolutely love see this same testing n 7.6whew….especially from a 16” 1/10”….but you’ve got my 5.56 juices goin so I’m gonna fire my ol carbine range model with the compass in the stock rn….lokk out black Bart!
Great video! Thanks.
none of these groups are on the orange target dot at any of the 3 ranges, which is why I prefer the 50/200 yard zero, you'll be slightly high at 100 yd on target @ 200 yd and about 8-10 inches low @ 300yd with the 50/200yd zero.
From a military aspect, you really can't beat a 200y zero for engagements in a predominantly urban enviroment (or for civilian use as home protection either). Depends what your expected engagements might be. One of my "5.56" rifles is an 18" Wylde used mostly for prairie dog sometimes out to 450-500y. That one is def a 300 zero and works best with 77gr.
@@mmorris7808 I like Hornady 75gr Superformance BTHP for distance, 60gr SP or 55gr SP for a defence round, and 55gr bulk FMJ for range use
I’m going to keep on asking for a 50yd zero video, but these are great videos
Great content!!!
I’m looking forward to the different height over bore scenarios since I have a HELION that has a very high heigh over bore. It would also be interesting to note which bullet types have better groupings. I have been under the impression that Frontier 62 and 77 gr bullets that are BTHP bullets have better groupings because of the design of the bullets.
After 3 videos, I'm subscribed.
Thank you! Really appreciate the support! Lots of fresh content coming so hope you’ll stay tuned
Another great informative video. Thanks
Great Stuff- you deserve more subscribers.
Excellent video brother!! 👍
Fantastic as always! Also a bit interesting to see the wind impact on the different bullet weights.
I'm also curious about the POI shift between the same type of ammunition made by different manufacturers. For example, how much difference would you see at 50/100/200/300 yards between 55 grain 556 made by Federal vs IMI vs Hornady vs PMC, etc.
love the reptilia mount, have that for my 3x15, but on 1x6 it was just too low, gonna try a 1.93 mount for that.
Great videos, keep up the good work!
These videos are fantastic! I would love to see a video of a 36yd zero with different grain weights but keeping the original zero to see point of impact shift. Say 77gr 36yd zero and shoot 55 and 62 with the zero for 77 and see how they compare