Thank you so much for this, effectively, expose of the rank unbelief of so many so called evangelical theologians and writers whose foul misrepresentations of the Bible, the Biblical authors, and the inerrent hermeneutics of the Biblical authors must be revealed and receive effective and decisive apologetical and polemical response.
Correction to Benjamin Gladd @48:30: the Dictionary of the NT Use of the OT is available for Accordance Bible Software and it is on sale until Tuesday February 13! Like all Accordance products, it is thoroughly hyperlinked.
9:41 Study Bible I look forward to getting this on logos Bible software! 40:13 yippie! Updated commentary! The next stage is an Exhaustive Database on the New Testament use of the Old and Biblical theology powered by Logos :) 44:43 the scripture index lists get us most of the way there.
This is great. Can't wait to get hands on this "Encyclopedia." Around the 20:00 mark, you're all talking about how the Evangelicals are generally doing it wrong. It might have been a good moment to mention Dennis Johnson's book that does a good job advocating for apostles' hermeneutics and reading of the OT in the NT. (Him We Proclaim: Preaching Christ from All the Scriptures)
Just saw this from Baker Academic, Understanding the New Testament Use of the Old Testament: Forms, Features, Framings, and Functions. Douglas S. Huffman (Aug. 2024)
That is a fantastic looking study Bible. And the CSB has been turning out high level content recently anyway. And I recall in Pauline Christology, where Gordon Fee roasts NT scholars (specifically Dunn and Thielman) for emptying Pauline "hymns" of reference to a pre-existent Christ, dredging up intertestimental or NT apocryphal "Wisdom Literature" Paul very well might not have even been aware of, dropping that into the hymn, assume Paul meant Wisdom not Christ, and then somehow misinterpreted the Wisdom literature, and denied he had a high Christology along with it.
59:00 Wellum and Gentry say specifically there *is* both a visible and invisible Church in Kingdom Through Covenants. They simply don't define the visible church as children of believers. But rather those who have falsely professed. Wellum also corrected London Lyceum on this point when they had a panel discussion on 4 views of the Covenants.
![ARGENTINA vs. CHILE [3-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 7](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/De3AWmXzhuA/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you so much for this, effectively, expose of the rank unbelief of so many so called evangelical theologians and writers whose foul misrepresentations of the Bible, the Biblical authors, and the inerrent hermeneutics of the Biblical authors must be revealed and receive effective and decisive apologetical and polemical response.
Amen Dr Machen!!
Correction to Benjamin Gladd @48:30: the Dictionary of the NT Use of the OT is available for Accordance Bible Software and it is on sale until Tuesday February 13!
Like all Accordance products, it is thoroughly hyperlinked.
9:41 Study Bible
I look forward to getting this on logos Bible software!
40:13 yippie! Updated commentary!
The next stage is an Exhaustive Database on the New Testament use of the Old and Biblical theology powered by Logos :) 44:43 the scripture index lists get us most of the way there.
Blue letter text is absolutely beautiful. Love it.
This is great. Can't wait to get hands on this "Encyclopedia." Around the 20:00 mark, you're all talking about how the Evangelicals are generally doing it wrong. It might have been a good moment to mention Dennis Johnson's book that does a good job advocating for apostles' hermeneutics and reading of the OT in the NT. (Him We Proclaim: Preaching Christ from All the Scriptures)
Great discussion! I will be getting a copy. Love Beale and Ladd.
Excellent discussion! Thank you for doing this!
Thank you for this. Can you put a link to Dr. Beale's article in the description?
Im so excited for that study Bible 😊😊
Just saw this from Baker Academic, Understanding the New Testament Use of the Old Testament: Forms, Features, Framings, and Functions. Douglas S. Huffman (Aug. 2024)
Dr. Beale needs another bookshelf 🙂
The best problem to have. 😊
Beale and Carson co-edited a version of this amazing book.
Amen.
Sounds very interesting
Can you put a link to the TGC article in the description?
That's a cool story about tracking down the CSB guy!
I am super excited for all of this!
That is a fantastic looking study Bible. And the CSB has been turning out high level content recently anyway.
And I recall in Pauline Christology, where Gordon Fee roasts NT scholars (specifically Dunn and Thielman) for emptying Pauline "hymns" of reference to a pre-existent Christ, dredging up intertestimental or NT apocryphal "Wisdom Literature" Paul very well might not have even been aware of, dropping that into the hymn, assume Paul meant Wisdom not Christ, and then somehow misinterpreted the Wisdom literature, and denied he had a high Christology along with it.
59:00 Wellum and Gentry say specifically there *is* both a visible and invisible Church in Kingdom Through Covenants. They simply don't define the visible church as children of believers. But rather those who have falsely professed.
Wellum also corrected London Lyceum on this point when they had a panel discussion on 4 views of the Covenants.