When Amy meets herself Time and space are already collapsing on themselves, The Doctor explains this during the episode when young Amy disappears and older Amy asks how she still exists when her younger self doesn't
To be fair, the 13 lives being broken was established in the Five Doctors in 1983 when the Timelords said they could grant the Master another regeneration cycle, so it's not unprecedented.
The master had already used his 13 regens that's why he had to take over Tremass's body in the keeper of traken . The timelords can offer extended regens in exceptional circumstances (such as bribes or what they see as heroic actions) . In the deadly assasin the master wanted to use the power of the matrix to get his regen power back. He regened from dr yana to John Simm's master by using the tardis's power.
@@markjones9020 Well, we don't know if he ended up with a whole new life cycle, somehow. Derek Jacobi could have been his 1st regeneration on the new cycle, for all we know.
Thank you for acknowledging the casual TARDIS killing, they’re like gold dust and the Doctor is just like “Eh whatevs, got mah own TARDIS, screw this living entity”.
I kind of wonder if the so-called writers they have on the series right now even know enough to know that they're living creatures and not just machines. They seem to have so little knowledge of or care for, the lore of the show I doubt they know.
@@LibraGamesUnlimited They probably don't and even if they did they wouldn't care because obviously they don't give a **** about prior cannon. The world would be a better place if every second of Doctor Who filmed since Capaldi regenerated could be completely and utterly removed from existence.
@@Me__Myself__and__I You tell that by the way, Jodie talked about the old series, calling it sexist and such. If there was anything in there that was sexist it was because of the time it was made in and that should always be taken into account. Despite that, the show had a lot of strong female characters such as Sarah Jane, Leela, Romana they even had a female Lord High President of Gallifrey, I think.
That's the one unforgivable one in my book, and I wasn't that bothered by the Timeless Child. Chibnal is alright at beginnings and middles, but he cannot write an ending, and this one is the worst. A TARDIS is infinitely large and can change it's configuration at will. She could have used the telepathic circuits to instruct that TARDIS to "loose" the Daleks in it's corridors and swimming pools and never allow them to find a control room, and then send it off into time and space as an eternal prison. At least now we know why the TARDIS never took the Doctor where he wanted to go and kept on sending him into danger. She always knew what this Doctor would do.
@@TheIrvy I can't say that I could any of the previous (actual) Doctors casually doing that. I mean IF a previous Doctor was in a situation and there was no other choice they MIGHT but they would at least acknowledge the sacrifice and feel bad about it. I really think the people running things now either never knew that TARDISes are alive or forgot or hoped whoever is still watching their crap didn't know or forgot.
Keep in mind; the doctor has literally said "Good men don't need rules, today is not the day to find out why I have so many." Implying he himself knows he's not necessarily a good person. And has those rules and companions to keep himself in check. most of the times he broke his rules was when he wasn't with a companion.
I can totally picture the TARDIS being like "Yeah, I'm not going to translate that. It's more dramatic/atmospheric if you don't know what it says!" Like Doctor, like TARDIS.
Sexy would totally do that. She effectively created Clara to wrangle the Doctor, and actively toyed with her in one mini-episode(possibly causing a bisexual awakening, although that part is ambiguous).
I have the same views on the Doctor’s behaviour in Hell Bent. Yes, there’s no denying he was acting out of character in it, but I think that’s the point. This episode and Waters of Mars both show the Doctor going alone for too long and the consequences it brings. He purposely did it in Waters, but he had little choice in Hell. Yes, it was revealed that he could leave at any time, but you’ve got to understand when he got put in the dial in the first place. Immediately after he lost a companion. We’ve all seen how the Doctor reacts to a companion leaving him. For New Who alone, we’ve had... Rose: Refusing to travel with anyone else, at least until Donna convinces him. Still, he doesn’t pay much attention to Martha for about half her tenure and won’t stop going on about Rose. Martha: Realising he screwed up with her, he isn’t looking for any kind of relationship. Cue Donna, who isn’t wanting to mate with him, sunshine. Donna: Permanently sticks to not traveling with someone, turning down possible future companions like Christina. However, this only results in Time Lord Victorious. Ponds: He just retires. If a certain little barmaid and governess hadn’t caught his attention, then he would probably still be retiring. Imagine how the universe will be... Bill and Nardole: Likely the last straw of people getting too close to him, as she prevents Yaz, Graham and Ryan from knowing a lot about her. Ryan and Graham: She realises that she could’ve had more to time to bond with them, had she not been too secretive. In fact, she was even planning to change time to prevent them from leaving. Thank god that Yaz was still there to keep her from going off the rails. Notice how a bunch of these either resulted or almost resulted in catastrophic events? Well, except for Donna’s, at least the Doctor had someone to get them back to their good old self. Only, this didn’t quite happen with Clara. Mere minutes after she died, he was forcibly put inside his own dial, not even having time to properly mourn her. Also, he was alone for a very long time, so the end result was never going to be good...
Whenever multiple Doctors meet each other, when it’s over and they go back to their own paths, only the most “future” Doctor remembers the encounter. It’s how “time” prevents paradox...might be something built into the Timelords’ psyche.
@@jamesayres8452 Maybe he only remembered from the point where he appeared. I consider it a bit of a handwave, not to be taken too seriously, but it was a nice touch. It explained why Peter Davison’s Doctor didn’t “remember” the events of The Five Doctors from when he was Jon Pertwee etc.
Regeneration isn't the mysterious and magical concept it once was anymore. Moffat and Chibs are guilty of using regeneration energy more times than it should be displayed, and it's gotten to a point where seeing the Doctor regenerate doesn't exude those feelings of wonder anymore
It’d be really interesting to see a Doctor who was a “black sheep” from the other incarnations, like the Eight was for the Renegade (The Eleven, etc). Maybe not _quite_ as different, just more like different methods for saving people, or not taking on companions, etc. *Would anyone else like that?* _Also, the “Angel-itis” makes sense as it could simply be the Weeping Angels’ version of reproduction, like how some plants duplicate themselves from a fragment, or how a parasite might incubate themselves in another organism, like a living cocoon._
@@commenterjosh2428 possibly, but more in the way that they stick by “The Doctor’s Code”, but simply go about it in a different way. The War Doctor simply _didn’t follow_ the Code. Nice thought, though 🙂
@@patchworkfellow Technically the Seventh Doctor counts as that, seeing how Seven was a lot more casual with just manipulating companion, allies and enemies for the greater good, something both the Sixth Doctor and the Eighth Doctor looked down upon whenever they mention their succesor/predesecor.
@@StillJustDreaming It's ok, I like to think about it like the sadder it is then the better it is and if it's not sad or emotional then there was nothing emotional about the chararcter. It also showed us how much everyone eally loved the 10th doctor
Dont hold your breath. I'm still hoping for the whole star wars sequel trilogy to get that treatment but does not seem any more likely. seems like all of entertainment has gone insane in the last decade.
@To Hell With Democracy Your attitudes are foul Do you lack the literary comprehension to not recognise a bad twist or poor writing and articulate it without honking your stupid nose and attributing it to the colour of the actors skin? Seriously reflect upon yourself. Don't pretend you dislike politics in your stories you just dislike any politics that disagrees with you.
They don't even try to follow there own rules. And that's fine. I used to be bothered but then i realised it's a show about a 900 year old shape-shifting man who travels through time in a police box who's greatest foes have toilet plungers for arms
Yeah, but I don't care for it preaching at other people about it though. I was perturbed when 11 got indignant about a lady killing a Saurilian after it assaulted her Dad. He didn't scold the lizard-lady once. But to the lady who retaliated "How dare you!" Oh piss off, Dr.
@@ryangreen6255 well they were clearly trying to push a message of holding your in group to a standard of pacifism while out groups can do whatever they want to you and you can't retaliate. You know i was actually thinking of that episode a few days ago. It's also hypocritical that the Doctor chides her for wanting to use tasers and cricket bats in self defense but then sprays a lizard woman with freezing extinguisher spray. Wouldn't that be as painful and harmful for a cold blooded lizard?
I've said there's a lot more to the changing timelines in father's day then just saving Pete (setting a new event just before tearing changing the core event), but I think since the adventures of the multiple Doctors lead to resolutions and don't cause any paradoxes, the timeline is safe, if confused enough to wipe the memories of the earlier incarnations. As for sensing another Timelord, perhaps that only applies when they are actively looking for the Timelord. It's like confirmation bias or listening to the same noise so much you don't notice it, until someone else mentions it.
Since the Master is the one usually not picked up by the Doctor, then one has to assume that over the centuries, the Master made some device that hides his Time Lord nature from other Time Lords. After all, if the Doctor could tell it was him every time, it would put a crimp in the whole "Take over the universe" thing, right?
@@nachochips1458 or, possibly, if it’s the same TARDIS that the current Doctor has, the same thing happens and the Chameleon Circuit breaks down, after landing in a time when Police Boxes are still commonplace.
The Doctor gaining another regeneration cycle can be *very loosely* tied back to The Five Doctors, where the Time Lords offer it to The Master. This is very minutely referred to when the Doctor pulls out the Seal Of The High Council that he stole from The Master in that episode.
@@LibraGamesUnlimited i never even finished 13's first series. I think i dropped it after the episode with the gay King hunting witches. Now i just watch the ratings go down to ever lower numbers.
@@samueleveleigh2767 I toughed it out through the first season (or series as they call it) but I had to nope out after that. Hell, watching that much became a chore, and, for the first time ever, I had episodes sitting on my DVR unwatched for weeks because I knew they were going to be awful. I hated that episode mostly because of that one scene where she was on the dunking stool and seemed so helpless and out of control. I just couldn't see that happening to any other Doctor. Most of them would have talked him into switching places with them in five minutes.
@@StillJustDreaming Not this one for sure. I'm pretty sure, if the show survives, to get a new showrunner they will clean house and undo all this mess. Given the nature of the show, it wouldn't be hard. The hard part would be convincing fans that it's worth coming back.
With regards to the "I would recognise a time lord", inconsistency. Tom Baker's Doctor explained that he had been severed from the Time Lord collective subconsious when he stole the Tardis and became a renegade. So maybe later regenerations forgot that he would not automatically recognise another time lord.
Just a little side note, when JW escaped Gallifrey after sending her family back in a house shaped Tardis, she then escaped in a tree before getting snatched away to prison. So there is still another Tardis standing in the quarry. Food for thought, if her Tardis is dying maybe pop in grab a few spares or maybe more.
I am amazed you didn't include classic who, the 3rd doctor, shot and murder an ogron, 6 poisoned shockeye, push 2 people into an acid bath, 7 destroyed the cybermen, blew up the entire Skaro system, where was the moral compass then. Also the regeneration limit was addressed in classic who, timelords could be offered a new cycle, the 5 doctors they offer the master a new cycle. so moffat did not put himself into a corner, the new cycle has been there for a long time.
The no guns thing was more a "No being armed when that can get you in trouble" thing in Classic. Tennant hated guns because he was still having a 'no more never again' attitude to the Time War. It's not a hard and fast rule.
In "The Five Doctors" the Time Lords offered a new set of regenerations to the Master, so what happened in "The Time of the Doctor" was within the rules of the show.
Heck, they litterally ressurected the Master for the Time War along with a new set of Regenerations, if they can do that, then giving a new set of Regenerations to the Doctor is really no big deal
The inconsistency of the Weeping Angels pretty much sums up my main problem with Steven Moffat. He's just like George Lucas in that he has good ideas and intentions, but likes to change things and doesn't know when to stop. That image of an Angel becomes an Angel thing would be fine if it Moffat had just simply left it at videos of Angels coming to life, but, of course, he had to go too far and do the Angel in the mind thing which creates all sorts of continuity problems and negates the whole purpose of looking at Angels to stop them. As for the TARDIS not translating the Hath, Martha seemed to be able to understand what the Hath were saying, so it's possible that the translation was working for the characters, but not for the audience.
during the three doctors serial, the timelords themselves allowed the 3 doctors of the time to gang up to save the universe from collapsing. This and The Day of The Doctor seems to be the only times they justified breaking the rules of time for the ultimate greater good.
They didn't really justified it though... they accept it as a solution but they were very aware it was against their laws... basically it was both an End of the World situation where if they didn't accept it, they'd all die and their laws wouldn't matter.. so less justified and more them accepting it as an exception, imo xD
There's probably an example of the doctor breaking rules in every episode... Doctor Who's rules are fluid and always changing to fit the show, this is overall probably a good thing.
For number 3, it's believed that time takes care of itself in extreme situations such as the contact and presense of two strong characters at the same by either removing the previous one, as seen in Father's day, or erases the memories if the time-lines overlapse, as said it Galifrey falls, no more. But what accually needs to be answered is the extremely terrible event of someone touching him or herself causing the inevetable paradox, unless with the use of a paradox machine!
What makes me laugh in revolution of the daleks is how all those daleks just fly into the lure TARDIS like sheep and all get destroyed; literally one dalek could have gone and killed the doctor! They really are so dumb sometimes considering they’re the deadliest killing machine in the universe 😂
they went and become more and more stupid with each successive incarnation since around doc4. which, granted, it somewhat does make sense with how some milestones of said incarnations has been set up (civil war anyone?) but... they just don't quite get to the exterminating before actually talking about doing it
the only rationale is that darlek are all individually motivated...they all wanted to be the one that killed the Doctor ... don't think of them as an army with coordination or a plan ... their orders on the Doctor is to kill at all costs.... by this logic they would all individually go after the Doctor ... there were also more in the ship that got destroyed separately so sending in the field troops would have also made sense as there were more in the ship if that didn't work.
@@graybradley3578 Quite rational reason with good motivation. But we shouldn't forget that the TARDIS is also 'bigger on the inside'. Some might even say infinite in size. So it might have been to limit the doctors movements. Because if only 1 Dalek went in, the Doctor could make it run in circles all day long (home field advantage and all), while many Daleks could spread out and limit movement/exterminate her faster.
There was also the opportunity to capture a TARDIS which, despite Dalek technological development and the Time War etc., would still be a major acquisition for them. The living metal (validium?) itself would be substantial spoils of conquest even without killing The Doctor. Although I'm by no means the biggest lore-hound out there, as far as know only the Monan Host were ever able to create time ships to rival or surpass Gallifreyan TARDISes , although they never achieved dimensional transcendence, so the Daleks would definitely love to take control of a TARDIS. And, having destroyed the Defence Drones, they kind of had nothing better to do.
One thing I never was able to grasp was when the doctor regenerated, he almost always had a crisis afterwards either a bout where he had amnesia or needed to have a good rest. Any other timelord could regenerate and be perfectly fine. Some like Romana could actually choose what they looked like.
most of their "deaths" were traumatic as well 1sts was old age and radiation poisoning 2nd was executed 3rd was also radiation poisoning 5th was just poisoned 7th was shot and had a bad reaction to the anesethetic (sp?) 10 was also radiation poisoning Romana was also much smarter than he, graduating with a much higher score
timelords can choose to regenerate at any time, if they do it without being killed they can choose their form, and probably dont suffer the personality crisis
9:10 If it's the master's tardis, It's possible he did something to it that had already effectively killed it irrevocably. Seems like the sort of thing he'd do. He did cannibalise the doctor's into a paradox machine after all, but thankfully that was reversible.
No, that wasn't the Master's TARDIS. We last saw that one in _Spyfall._ The 'house' TARDIS apparently destroyed in _Revolution of the Daleks_ was just a random TARDIS picked up from Gallifrey in _The Timeless Children._
@@DeadlyRivfader perhaps then the lifeform of that TARDIS had been moved elsewhere, leaving just the disused machine. Or maybe the Master killed all the TARDISes when he destroyed gallifrey - this one seems more likely than the first.
@@alansmithee419 Im still new to the Who universe so the thing regarding the TARDIS models is a bit fuzzy but as I understand it the TARDIS was a model that wasnt used anymore at that time meaning it shouldnt have been there at all unless the Master for some reason decided to put it there for anyone to take.
For regeneration energy, 11th used energy to heal river and he ended regenerating into an old man, so I think we have already saw using regeneration energy backfiring.
he didnt regenerate into an old man, he just got old, Time Lords live roughly 1000 years per incarnation then regernerate, its only trouble loving twats like the doctor that burn through their regeneration so quick, 11th was the only one to live a normal time lord life span
For #4, About crossing into their own timelines, I believe Day of the Doctor showed that the past versions will forget their encounters from their future, which explains why 11 didn’t know what would happen next after meeting 10, and could also apply for timelords in general as I think something similar happened between the master and missy in the season 10 finale. The only exception that I can remember, however, is the paradox between 5 and 10 in that doctor who short before the titanic episode
Blink is easily one of my favourite episodes because of its tension and I didnt mind them being brought back in flesh and stone because of the cool twist about the characters not realising that the statues should've had 2 heads but when we saw the statues move, everything was ruined because we achieved the impossible and now it doesnt seem like they're lightning fast and can move metres within nanoseconds, that just ruined it
"and the Timeless Children can just piss off for the moment!" - if I could subscribe to your channel twice I would subscribe a second time for that statement!
The translation thing with the Tardis could just be a whim of the Tardis as well to not spoil the Doctor on his adventures. Since it is established that the Tardis is sentient and has a strong empathic link with the Doctor.
7:48 Yeah this part still doesn't make sense to me. I understand that timelords can regenerate. But didn't the tenth doctor explain that regeneration still feels like death? He explained that it feels like a new face and person just takes over. So, didn't he still just forced a friend to go through regeneration? ( taken around 1:20 in this video from the episode - ruclips.net/video/2Ie61iL9Jzs/видео.html ) Even if you ignored all of that, that still is a life being taken away. It is known that Timelords can regenerate only so many times. The Doctor got away with this rule, but not other timelords. Which in meaning, he still made the general closer to death even if he didn't actually kill him.
Actually, I have a theory that covers your last one. The Tardis is alive, she and the Doctor do communicate (in their own way), so maybe the Tardis let the Doctor know that she was on board with being destroyed if it meant saving the Earth. It wouldn't even be the first time we've seen this - the Tardis was willing to burn herself up to fill in for the non existent sun so that life on Earth would continue (in The Big Bang)
I've always loved the "Never cruel nor cowardly". Especially when he drowned the racknoss babies under them river Thames, or destroyed an entire cyberman fleet to ask a simple question. Oh and every encounter with anything Dalek shaped. Like when he found the dalek supreme in a crashed ship and taunted it before looting its data banks. Yeah. God guy that doctor
In the Five Doctors special the Master was summoned to Gallifrey to help the Doctor who had been kidnapped in 5 of his incarnations with 4 of them landing in the Death Zone. The Time Lords offered the Master a 'whole new regeneration cycle' as incentive to go. In Underworld the Doctor talks about the Minyons who were given technical help by the first Time Lords to advance their civilisation - and who then kicked them off the planet and went to war destroying it. Before the end they launched a spacecraft to try to locate the P7E which held the genetic race bank. The crew were in the mission for hundreds of years and used a system of forced regenerations - over and over again. There is a line about the body being renewed but the spirit being weary of endless life. And in Mordryn undead the crew of the ship had been experimenting on themselves with a symbiotic metamorphosis generator to give themselves the same ability as the Time Lords. So technically the new cycle of regenerations 'gifted' the Doctor by the Time Lords did not break cannon. The Timeless Child trying to tell us that there had been thousands of Doctors and zillions of regenerations did not so much BREAK tradition as liquidize it and flush it down the toilet.
Probably my most hated inconsistancy with the angels is when theyre reintroduced. In Blink Ten said, "No choice, its a FACT of their biology,. In the sight of any living thing, they ℹ ITERALLY TURN TO STONE." But, in Flesh and Stone, Eleven says, "They're scared and their instincts will take over. Walk like you can see." That really irked me because of the blatent controdiction.
I think in Father’s Day the reason for the reapers appearing was explained by there being two versions of rose and the doctor present when rose changed time and saved pete, so therefore it was a weak point in time
Actually it was explained by the Doctor that the Timelords would normally prevent the reapers from going on a rampage like that and fix whatever damage they caused, but with their absence in the universe the reapers were now free to cause havoc.
For the angles one it is consistent, the pictures of the angles in blink actually did become angles, there were the angles we saw in the house, almost making it a time loop, because the angles were created from the pictures of themselves.
"The Timeless child can piss off" *Talks about the doctor using regeneration energy and it not effecting his regeneration* Almost as if that wouldve answered your question
I think the whole “Time Lord Detection” thing was honestly just 10 trying to make himself feel more confident. Reassuring himself that he’d recognize a Time Lord, even if he never actually possessed that skill
for the Doctor using guns thing, it may be a new who thing where the Doctor against using guns (for the most part), but in classic who, he used guns multiple times like in Resurrection of the Daleks, Peter Davidson's 5th Doctor used a gun to shoot and kill a Dalek mutant without a second thought, and i think is was in the Invasion of time where Tom Baker's 4th Doctor used a gun against the Sontarans that were invading Gallifrey
I always assumed that the Tardis only translates what is needed… we see the doctor speak baby, Judoon and the other alien languages that don’t get translated. So in my head canon it’s basically automatically translating the languages that the doctor cannot understand/speak already, with the exception of the very few languages outside of the knowledge of time lord tech. I think it makes sense and fits and it’s my canon until proven otherwise.
I thought it was funny when, in "Journeys End," Davros described the Doctor as "the man who never carries a gun," despite Peter Davison's Doctor in "Resurrection of the Daleks," coming in with a Dalek gun, and calmly announcing to Davros that he was there as his executioner. Thus far, as a lifelong Whovian (as a young child visiting England in 1966 with the family, we saw the second Peter Cushing Dalek feature film in cinema in its original release, my becoming a lifelong fan of Daleks and the concept of the TARDIS; then watching the TV series once the Tom Baker episodes began airing in America in the late 1970s, and once it moved to PBS, I was able to see every single episode that was then currently available), I consider all of Jodie Whitaker's era to be an alternate universe, non-canonical fever dream (particularly the illogical "Doctor Ruth"/Timeless Child concept). Having "Doctor" Ruth's buried TARDIS being shaped as a police box is not only ridiculous, but is absolutely contradictory of the origins of the series: in the second episode Susan explains to Ian and Barbara about the ship's chameleon circuit, describing several shapes in which the TARDIS's outer shell has taken (including but not limited to a sedan chair), so if Doctor Ruth was a pre-Hartnell doctor, where is Susan, and how is her TARDIS even a police box...? It is clear that Chris Chibnel hates Doctor Who only slightly less than he loathes the show's fan base.
I just finished the New Doctor Who (2005 on) and the Torchwood series. I seem to recall an episode where the Doctor explained the call box design as being the chameleon circuit of the Tardis was non functioning and he had gotten around to fixing it.
@@julieeverett7442 And how am i exected to watch all of them when many episodes are unavailable and many are hard to find unless you pay dumb prices for the dvd's : )
I suppose they're using the regenerative aspect to a more broader spectrum. If the regeneration energy not only changes their biology and healing them, they might be able to put them in hiatus for other usages like David Tennant when it came to Doctor Donna and the Meta-Crisis Doctor. There are some things the Doctor doesn't know he would do, because time is not something he can predict but travel through. Of course, him sparing his regenerative energy did come in handy a few times, how he helped Darvos even if Darvos never wanted the Doctor's help.
With the timelords it could be explained by saying that its docotr is different from the next atomically so its allowed for them to encounter each other since they aren't atomically the same person
More importantly regarding the Statue of Liberty: a) it's not made of stone and b) How is it ever be able to move? It's the most iconic symbol in the city that never sleeps. There will always be someone looking at it, making it always quantum-locked.
Best thing about Chib's run is a future showrunner has a bunch of stories of which to draw from in terms of consequences Like the TARDIS she killed, the spiders she let starve, or anyone she's let die and we didn't explicitly SEE die
The Master got his second cycle after The Five Doctors, as a reward for helping take down Borusa. He was melted into goop by the Daleks, which likely did it in a way to keep him from regenerating. He then got yet another new cycle after the High Council resurrected him, which means he’s on his 4th self of his 3rd cycle right now.
They only offer him the set if he helps The Doctor. He agrees and The Doctor doesn't accept his help. Nothing is said after this to show he was given a new set. The Master is in his second set of regenerations following his resurrection to fight in the Time War.
I think the Doctors all fall on a spectrum between two extremes. One side being more like the war Doctor and the other side is more hopeful and tries to follow the rules. Every now and then old personality traits from past Doctors pops up due to each Doctor being all of his incarnations and an individual person at the same time.
i use to get really weird about inconsistencies in this show, but then i started throwing human knowledge into the question such as; each race and nation has different cultures so if some weeping angels prey on people via the terrifying aspects of blink but they might have sub cultures such as the ones in matt smiths era who were also relatively terrifying because they did things different.
The "agency" that resets the Doctors memories after every 12 regenerations seems to have disappeared when Matt Smith's death was near. Unless, I suppose, they somehow knew the Time Lord's were gonna "gift" him more even though he didn't need them being the Timeless Child. Oh you Timey Wimey complicated-ness!
For number four, in Father's Day, Rose changed her past by saving her father, but she wouldn't have known to save him, or even gone back to when he died, because of the change. In the other cases, the changes didn't prevent themselves, except that Christmas one, although that could probably be explained as the man forgetting.
Regeneration is essentially limited by the law of the Time Lords. However, they can grant exceptions and revive dead Time Lords whenever they feel it's necessary. Also, we know that The Doctor tends towards the darker side when not traveling with someone. After losing Amy and Rory, The Doctor essentially stayed in Victorian London, brooding all the while. He meets and loses Clara and goes off into hiding again in a monastery until the original Clara calls him. The 10th Doctor also made a number of questionable decisions when without a companion.
I have a theory about the imploding TARDIS. What if it didn't actually implode and die but folded its external dimensions so tight that it became microscopic, effectively imprisoning the Daleks rather than killing them, kinda like a makeshift Genesis Ark. I'm gonna assume she wrecked the controls so that the Daleks didn't end up with a TARDIS though.
The Statue Of Liberty as an angel was bloody stupid. Whoever wrote it obviously didn't realise that it's not made of stone: it's copper sheets on a steel frame - nearer a building than a statue. And the idea was done better in 'Ghostbusters II'.
I don't think you can call the Time Lords giving The Doctor a new set of regenerations a Deus Ex Machina. It was established in The Five Doctors that the Time Lords can grant a new set to any Time Lord...as they offer The Master if he helps The Doctor during that special. Not really an ass pull if it's something that had, at that point, been established for 30 years
Actually Timeless child makes that seem less stupid. If it something that has been grafted on to Gallifrey physiology then it can be augmented, something that had naturally evolved not so much
As bad as the timeless child plot is, (from my understanding) I do appreciate what what Chibnel was trying to do and give doctor who the potential to go on forever but it was such a big pile of piss the way he did it.
@@william...1 dude, chill the fuck out. I'm sorry if I have offended you but if you haven't seen the new years episode, he made it clear that we have to deal with it.
@@william...1 the time war plot worked cause they took seven seasons, they didnt just info dump the entire war in a 2 parter there was teasing and clues and build up, the timeless child was just "oh btw youre magic now or w/e" there was no build up
@@paleoleft the way you just invalidated your whole point. you’ve given the man two episodes to explain something on the scale with something else that took 7 seasons. all the time war stuff was actually dumped in end of time and then again in day of the doctor, so it wasn’t subtle.
@@william...1 no it wasnt subtle, it didnt need to be, but there was a clear idea of what happened during the time war chibnall is leaving next season so the timeless child plot is either gonna be rushed, unfinished, or retconned
The whole being able to recognise a time lord thing has a simple explanation, he could recognise the master as harold saxon when he knew the master was out there and he was looking for him, but the doctor wasn't looking for missy or O and didn't know the master was alive either of those times.
mostly right 10 the thirteen rule, it was established in classic who that on very very VERY rare occasions the high council of Gallifrey can grant another cycle, the master was granted one to find the doctor in the 5 doctors, so having the council making a crack and granting a cycle to the doctor was not that strange. Recognizing other time lords, yes they can IF their pure time lord. 4th doctor for several stories the master was a rotting husk as he had used all thirteen lives, he continued by stealing another mans body (Keeper of Traken - look it up) The master is no longer pure Gallifreyian! Not killing people, er have you seen 5th and 7th? They were ruthless little buggers, 5th shot a cyberman in the chest and on another occasion stuffed gold dust in ones chest, suffocating them. 7th tricked Davros to blow up scaro. Crossing the time streams 3, 5 2 and day of the doctor, EVERY single time it was not them that initiated them crossing their time lines. Three doctors the council of time lords pulled doctors 1and 2 out of their stream to help 3rd as he was having some real problems 5 doctors they were scooped up and dropped on Gallifrey to play a dumb game 2 doctors 2nd got in real trouble and 6th got pulled back to help him or he wouldnt exist day of the doctor, that was the moment wasnt it. Only fathers day had non outside interferance, hence the reapers THEY deliberately broke the law do some research doctor who is 57 years old, not 16!!!!!
I think you forgot an important part of killing a TARDIS: that killing a TARDIS (at least while its consciousness is still inside) will cause damage on par with a Sun going supernova. It literally ended the universe in 11's era; removing the consciousness so that the TARDIS could be *safely* eaten was a part of the Doctor's Wife; etc.
regeneration energy really did a number on future iterations of the doctor. Capaldi was old and to some degree senile for the first few episodes. and Whittaker was missing an appendage, half her brain, and the sense of general politeness and respect for all. you say it was ignored, I say it explains the sudden drop in quality after Matt smith left the stage.
I don't even care about the timeless child reveal because I'm still more pissed that Chibnal felt the need to explode Gallifrey again. Why? We had *just* gotten it back and only had one or two episodes with it. What a waste.
For the 'not spotting time lords' thing. I would give The Master a pass, given, they're The Master. They probably found a way around it so they could mess with the Doctor more
You probably wont read this but these are the connections ive found regarding me and a reoccuring theme of "aliens" "space" and "time travel" SO FAR: Im what you call an indigo child,i was born sick and premature on september 8 1985 a blonde straight haired fat baby. I was kind of a weird kid,adults trusted me and i had a strong sense of intuition.In my childhood there is a theme of "aliens" space" and time travel".I was obsessed with et (alien) and then i saw terminator 2 in theaters and i was hooked (time travel).When i was 8 i got really into astronomy and meteors and asked my dad for a telescope (space). Then i learned about astrology (space).When i was 7 or so i used to wear a labcoat around the neighborhood and say i was a scientist. (space?lol)I loved a movie called weird science and the character gary had curly hair and i really wanted curly hair so in the 6th grade it darkens and starts to curl.Anyway these are minor things heres the meat of it.So my friends kept telling me to watch this show doctor who but i refused because it was british. It kept coming up and one day i go to a convention in my homestate of oklahoma.I see the tardis which is a police phone box and i see ths interesting old man with a question mark umbrella and i see that NO ONE is talking to him.I feel kind of bad for him and he seemed pretty interesting so i go up to him and say "so whats this doctor who all about?" he excitedly gasps and explains this story of a time traveling alien that changes his appearance when he dies but is still the same person,he is thousands of years old and he goes around helping people and saving them.He even said that i looked like the 10th doctor who would be my favorite.Anyway i love the show and decide ive never related to a character more and decide i should play him so i write this season and i have some cool things in it like meeting edison and tesla and the return of old villains.As i research some of teslas work i come across this ufo that uses an electron accumulator to raise its magnetic vibrational frequency to match its environment and achieve zero point and begin to teleport.Ralph ring explains that the craft is flown telepathically and that it is to be regarded to as a friend as in its an alive energy field much like doctor whos tardis.Ralph explains that they went back in time and he couldnt immediately remember the journey as our brains have trouble retaining it so memories are fragmented.The maker of this crafts name is otis and my middle name is odis.Otis winds up taking a dummy craft of the otcx-1 to oklahoma my home state.In the 2005 reboot of doctor who "oklahoma " is said 3 times.The very first episode of doctor who aired november 23rd 1963 a day after the jfk assasination.My grandpa was given a wallet by his daughter from a family friend who suggested she het it and went and had the wallet made which grandpa odis wore till he died. The family friend was jack ruby,the man who shot lee harvey oswald in the jfk assasination.Two minor mentions of jfk and time travel are in the unbrella academy and 11-22-63 by stephen king.The 7th doctor (th interesting old man i met in oklahoma who explained doctor who to me) first premeired on september 7th 1987 a day before my 2nd birthday. So one day on easter 2019 i ask god to show me a sign and i asked if i could be doctor who if i worked hard enough. An orange orb appeared moving other worldly but i dismiss it looking for a meteor "thats not a meteor because meteors flash" right as i say flash a green meteor like object darts across the sky.I was STUNNED my brain couldnt handle it and i started thinking i was jesus.Then i layed on the bed and thats when i envisioned a gray alien trying to talk to me with this black cube.One night an old episode of the 4th doctor just popped on.The doctor meets a god like figure and asks him to retreive the key of time which is a cube like the tesseract and much like a majestic 12 ex member account of et tech that is a black cube responsible for accessing stargates for travel into other dimensions.Anyway i was unsure if i just imagined that since it was in my mind but i felt smarter.i start getting manic and doig crazy stuff so my dad has me committed for a week and i NEEDED it.After i regained my sanity after having what is called a kunalini awakening in which a serpent of energy runs through your chakras filling you with oneness with the lord and bliss ive never felt before.I stayed out on my ex bosses property and kept kinding snakes,3 total one a giant green snake that just layed there and let me pick it up.So while this is going on the new season of doctor who comes out and they have an episode with edison and tesla like my episode and at the end of the finale it is evealed that doctor who is essentially god...like i thought i was.i also forgot to mention i found a patent for a time machine and the person who registered it lives in tulsa oklahoma which is where i live...whe i got out of the mental ward i was diagnosed with bipolar which is a mood disorder.The 6th doctor also had a mood disorder and tried to choke his companion.He has blue eyes and curly hair and kind of looks like me along with the 10th doctor.in series 12 of doctor who a curly haired character named charlie is revealed the villain and collapses to his death.Anyway thats all i have so far but i feel like this was set up or something,its blowing my mind.I should also mention that in numerology my life path was a 4 and when i had my awakening i my lifepath 22 and became what is called the master builder and the manifestor of dreams.So in conclussion i deduce that i am the real doctor...somehow.
With crossing timelines I think we can link this with the new Loki series and how due to there always being a natural disaster of some sorts nothing can occur due to it already either being destroyed or going to be and that’s why the reapers have only appeared in that one episode due to there not being a natural disaster of sorts to effect the change of the outcome but with the other episodes there have such as the destruction of Gallifrey or The cybermen takeover with the two masters
Actually, the rule of 13 has been established as flexible for a while. It's been established for a while that a time lord can take another timelord's regenerations. That's one of the things that the Master has done (or at least attempted to do). Then again, the rule of 13 was a retcon itself. When the TARDIS doesn't translate a language, it's because of the fact that it doesn't translate for whatever reason. For example, Gallifreyan probably doesn't translate intentionally by design. Timelords probably don't want other races to reach the level of technology that they have (timelords are real assholes, aren't they?). And then there are languages too old to translate. And there are probably languages that simply can't translate, similar to how River was named River because of a translation error with a language that doesn't have a translation for Pond. When it comes to crossing timelines, I think it's more an argument that you're not allowed to interfere with your own timeline. And interacting would cause a paradox. When it comes to timelords, however, I think they do have a way to compensate. They are simply prevented from remembering past lives. That way, their present selves can't be affected by interacting with their past selves. The 1st Doctor never remembered the 2nd, 3rd, and 12th Doctors. The 2nd Doctor never remembered the 3rd Doctor. The War Doctor never remembered the 10th and 11th. The 10th will never remember the 11th or the interaction with the War Doctor because of that affiliation. Saxon doesn't remember meeting Missy, which Missy specifically points out. And as for Ruth, that's just an entirely different can of worms. Gallifrey Falls No More refers to a specific event. And even if it didn't, do you really think the Doctor would've had enough foresight to foresee what would happen in the future? ...Actually, don't answer that. Bad choice of words. As for killing a TARDIS, despite the idea that I've never known that to be a rule (and the "no guns" thing was more of a preference, probably because of the War Doctor), a TARDIS has a symbiotic relationship with its timelord. But what does that mean for a TARDIS that has no timelord? The TARDIS would eventually die of old age (technically it will deteriorate without a timelord's regeneration energy). Basically, I think it's just more complicated than we know of.
I think the reasons subsequent angels new mechanics were asdded after the first become pretty popular and they just wanted to add more to it. If this was the case, then that would be why there were inconsistencies later on, tho i think the liberty statue being an angel was too much for me lol.
When Amy meets herself Time and space are already collapsing on themselves, The Doctor explains this during the episode when young Amy disappears and older Amy asks how she still exists when her younger self doesn't
Just wanted to comment this
To be fair, the 13 lives being broken was established in the Five Doctors in 1983 when the Timelords said they could grant the Master another regeneration cycle, so it's not unprecedented.
Hadn't heard that bit before - thanks! Now I have a new reason to try to find a way to watch that special
@@StillJustDreaming Maybe try the DVD?
The master had already used his 13 regens that's why he had to take over Tremass's body in the keeper of traken . The timelords can offer extended regens in exceptional circumstances (such as bribes or what they see as heroic actions) . In the deadly assasin the master wanted to use the power of the matrix to get his regen power back.
He regened from dr yana to John Simm's master by using the tardis's power.
@@markjones9020 Well, we don't know if he ended up with a whole new life cycle, somehow. Derek Jacobi could have been his 1st regeneration on the new cycle, for all we know.
And the fact The Master was resurrected for the Time War.
Thank you for acknowledging the casual TARDIS killing, they’re like gold dust and the Doctor is just like “Eh whatevs, got mah own TARDIS, screw this living entity”.
I kind of wonder if the so-called writers they have on the series right now even know enough to know that they're living creatures and not just machines. They seem to have so little knowledge of or care for, the lore of the show I doubt they know.
@@LibraGamesUnlimited They probably don't and even if they did they wouldn't care because obviously they don't give a **** about prior cannon. The world would be a better place if every second of Doctor Who filmed since Capaldi regenerated could be completely and utterly removed from existence.
@@Me__Myself__and__I You tell that by the way, Jodie talked about the old series, calling it sexist and such. If there was anything in there that was sexist it was because of the time it was made in and that should always be taken into account.
Despite that, the show had a lot of strong female characters such as Sarah Jane, Leela, Romana they even had a female Lord High President of Gallifrey, I think.
That's the one unforgivable one in my book, and I wasn't that bothered by the Timeless Child. Chibnal is alright at beginnings and middles, but he cannot write an ending, and this one is the worst. A TARDIS is infinitely large and can change it's configuration at will. She could have used the telepathic circuits to instruct that TARDIS to "loose" the Daleks in it's corridors and swimming pools and never allow them to find a control room, and then send it off into time and space as an eternal prison. At least now we know why the TARDIS never took the Doctor where he wanted to go and kept on sending him into danger. She always knew what this Doctor would do.
@@TheIrvy I can't say that I could any of the previous (actual) Doctors casually doing that. I mean IF a previous Doctor was in a situation and there was no other choice they MIGHT but they would at least acknowledge the sacrifice and feel bad about it.
I really think the people running things now either never knew that TARDISes are alive or forgot or hoped whoever is still watching their crap didn't know or forgot.
As The Doctor would say: NEVER TELL ME THE RULES
"NEVER, EVER TELL ME THE RULES!!"
Such a legendary Doctor
it's daleks never tell me the rules
a man that understands Consequences...
😂😂😂
He'll use the rules like a to-do list
Keep in mind; the doctor has literally said "Good men don't need rules, today is not the day to find out why I have so many." Implying he himself knows he's not necessarily a good person. And has those rules and companions to keep himself in check. most of the times he broke his rules was when he wasn't with a companion.
I can totally picture the TARDIS being like "Yeah, I'm not going to translate that. It's more dramatic/atmospheric if you don't know what it says!"
Like Doctor, like TARDIS.
Sexy would totally do that. She effectively created Clara to wrangle the Doctor, and actively toyed with her in one mini-episode(possibly causing a bisexual awakening, although that part is ambiguous).
@@hesiod_delta9209 Shhhhhh! The name Sexy is only for when they're alone!
Even though it was the wrong thing to do, it's understandable why 10 disobeyed the laws of time.
nice profile pic btw
also, good analogy :)
understandable, have a great day
That's what make it such a great episode
@@hermiona1147 true
I have the same views on the Doctor’s behaviour in Hell Bent. Yes, there’s no denying he was acting out of character in it, but I think that’s the point.
This episode and Waters of Mars both show the Doctor going alone for too long and the consequences it brings.
He purposely did it in Waters, but he had little choice in Hell.
Yes, it was revealed that he could leave at any time, but you’ve got to understand when he got put in the dial in the first place. Immediately after he lost a companion.
We’ve all seen how the Doctor reacts to a companion leaving him.
For New Who alone, we’ve had...
Rose: Refusing to travel with anyone else, at least until Donna convinces him. Still, he doesn’t pay much attention to Martha for about half her tenure and won’t stop going on about Rose.
Martha: Realising he screwed up with her, he isn’t looking for any kind of relationship. Cue Donna, who isn’t wanting to mate with him, sunshine.
Donna: Permanently sticks to not traveling with someone, turning down possible future companions like Christina. However, this only results in Time Lord Victorious.
Ponds: He just retires. If a certain little barmaid and governess hadn’t caught his attention, then he would probably still be retiring. Imagine how the universe will be...
Bill and Nardole: Likely the last straw of people getting too close to him, as she prevents Yaz, Graham and Ryan from knowing a lot about her.
Ryan and Graham: She realises that she could’ve had more to time to bond with them, had she not been too secretive. In fact, she was even planning to change time to prevent them from leaving. Thank god that Yaz was still there to keep her from going off the rails.
Notice how a bunch of these either resulted or almost resulted in catastrophic events? Well, except for Donna’s, at least the Doctor had someone to get them back to their good old self.
Only, this didn’t quite happen with Clara. Mere minutes after she died, he was forcibly put inside his own dial, not even having time to properly mourn her.
Also, he was alone for a very long time, so the end result was never going to be good...
To be fair to Capaldi using regeneration energy on Davros, he DID end up losing an “appendage” in his next regeneration.
I don't think good writing would be considered an appendage
@@themostbritishpersonalive868 mic drop
Sure it wasn’t his brain?
@@ColHanko his pen15. do you get the joke? I think it’s funny.
@@YuriChampion22 I got the joke
Whenever multiple Doctors meet each other, when it’s over and they go back to their own paths, only the most “future” Doctor remembers the encounter. It’s how “time” prevents paradox...might be something built into the Timelords’ psyche.
Almost true... But Peter Capaldi was the most "future" Doctor in Day of the Doctor.
@@paulbeardsley4095 and as we know capaldi doctor did remember it after the events
@@jamesayres8452 Maybe he only remembered from the point where he appeared.
I consider it a bit of a handwave, not to be taken too seriously, but it was a nice touch. It explained why Peter Davison’s Doctor didn’t “remember” the events of The Five Doctors from when he was Jon Pertwee etc.
Regeneration isn't the mysterious and magical concept it once was anymore. Moffat and Chibs are guilty of using regeneration energy more times than it should be displayed, and it's gotten to a point where seeing the Doctor regenerate doesn't exude those feelings of wonder anymore
It’d be really interesting to see a Doctor who was a “black sheep” from the other incarnations, like the Eight was for the Renegade (The Eleven, etc). Maybe not _quite_ as different, just more like different methods for saving people, or not taking on companions, etc.
*Would anyone else like that?*
_Also, the “Angel-itis” makes sense as it could simply be the Weeping Angels’ version of reproduction, like how some plants duplicate themselves from a fragment, or how a parasite might incubate themselves in another organism, like a living cocoon._
A 'black sheep' Doctor? You mean like the War Doctor?
@@commenterjosh2428 possibly, but more in the way that they stick by “The Doctor’s Code”, but simply go about it in a different way. The War Doctor simply _didn’t follow_ the Code.
Nice thought, though 🙂
@@patchworkfellow thanks 😁
@@patchworkfellow Technically the Seventh Doctor counts as that, seeing how Seven was a lot more casual with just manipulating companion, allies and enemies for the greater good, something both the Sixth Doctor and the Eighth Doctor looked down upon whenever they mention their succesor/predesecor.
@@samuelkremer441 that’s true...
Timeless child be like:
Agreed
Like whaaaaaaaaaaaat we have seen Clara go into the doctor did something in trenzolar so clearly the doctor can die
Chinball be like...
The what?
I hate the fact that the doctor killed a TARDIS I even yelled at my screen when I saw it.
The Chibnail/Whitaker version of Doctor Who is complete rubbish.
Even if we view the Tardis as an entity, it's not like the Doctor hasn't killed or sacrificed other entities before.
On TARDIS Translation: Extremis was inside an imperfect Monk simulation, and in The Rings of Akhaten the TARDIS didn't like Clara.
Me: Finishes the video
Also Me: "I don't want to go..."
Ouch! (ok, good - but oh the poor 10th!)
@@StillJustDreaming It's ok, I like to think about it like the sadder it is then the better it is and if it's not sad or emotional then there was nothing emotional about the chararcter. It also showed us how much everyone eally loved the 10th doctor
Number two has never been a rule for him, he's committed genocide on more than one occasion.
This murder not genocide
@@bundaben24 genocide is the murder of an entire race, I mention it to highlight how insignificant murder is to the lengths he goes to to win.
@@timidwolf every time he does it, absolutely destroys him
I really hope that whoever writes after Chibnall leaves just retcons the whole era as a nightmare and it never happened in canon
Dont hold your breath. I'm still hoping for the whole star wars sequel trilogy to get that treatment but does not seem any more likely. seems like all of entertainment has gone insane in the last decade.
The last ever shot of Dr Who is when 12 looks up at the stars and says "I'd wish there'd be stars" everything else is a dream
@To Hell With Democracy Your attitudes are foul
Do you lack the literary comprehension to not recognise a bad twist or poor writing and articulate it without honking your stupid nose and attributing it to the colour of the actors skin?
Seriously reflect upon yourself. Don't pretend you dislike politics in your stories you just dislike any politics that disagrees with you.
@To Hell With Democracy You do realise that Doctor Who is a British television show...right?
A good writer can fix everything and explain every bad decision made by the previous writer without doing the "it was all a dream" bit.
They don't even try to follow there own rules. And that's fine. I used to be bothered but then i realised it's a show about a 900 year old shape-shifting man who travels through time in a police box who's greatest foes have toilet plungers for arms
LOL - greatest description for the Daleks ever!
2000* he's over 2000 years old
Yeah, but I don't care for it preaching at other people about it though. I was perturbed when 11 got indignant about a lady killing a Saurilian after it assaulted her Dad. He didn't scold the lizard-lady once. But to the lady who retaliated "How dare you!" Oh piss off, Dr.
@@ryangreen6255 well they were clearly trying to push a message of holding your in group to a standard of pacifism while out groups can do whatever they want to you and you can't retaliate.
You know i was actually thinking of that episode a few days ago. It's also hypocritical that the Doctor chides her for wanting to use tasers and cricket bats in self defense but then sprays a lizard woman with freezing extinguisher spray. Wouldn't that be as painful and harmful for a cold blooded lizard?
"And the 'timeless children' can just piss off right from that one..." - Rich
Hell Yeah!
I'm impressed. It took Rich over one minute to bitch about the Timeless Children. He usually does it in the first sentence.
I've said there's a lot more to the changing timelines in father's day then just saving Pete (setting a new event just before tearing changing the core event), but I think since the adventures of the multiple Doctors lead to resolutions and don't cause any paradoxes, the timeline is safe, if confused enough to wipe the memories of the earlier incarnations.
As for sensing another Timelord, perhaps that only applies when they are actively looking for the Timelord. It's like confirmation bias or listening to the same noise so much you don't notice it, until someone else mentions it.
Since the Master is the one usually not picked up by the Doctor, then one has to assume that over the centuries, the Master made some device that hides his Time Lord nature from other Time Lords. After all, if the Doctor could tell it was him every time, it would put a crimp in the whole "Take over the universe" thing, right?
This is why 10 and 11 are my favourites
I still don't understand why Ruth's tardis was a police box. I mean it only got stuck with the first doctor so why was her's like that?
Because chibnall wanted it to be
Most logical explanation is that ruths tardis detected the doctors tardis and changed how it looked using the working chameleon arch
@@nachochips1458 or, possibly, if it’s the same TARDIS that the current Doctor has, the same thing happens and the Chameleon Circuit breaks down, after landing in a time when Police Boxes are still commonplace.
@@nachochips1458 *chameleon circuit
The chameleon arch is what allows timelords to disguise themselves as humans.
It proves that she's between the 2nd and 3rd Doctors. It's the only regeneration we haven't really seen.
The Doctor gaining another regeneration cycle can be *very loosely* tied back to The Five Doctors, where the Time Lords offer it to The Master. This is very minutely referred to when the Doctor pulls out the Seal Of The High Council that he stole from The Master in that episode.
this whole video should just be 9 minutes of the timeless child
I refuse to watch it or accept it as actual cannon. As far as I'm concerned it never happened.
@@LibraGamesUnlimited i never even finished 13's first series.
I think i dropped it after the episode with the gay King hunting witches.
Now i just watch the ratings go down to ever lower numbers.
@@samueleveleigh2767 I toughed it out through the first season (or series as they call it) but I had to nope out after that.
Hell, watching that much became a chore, and, for the first time ever, I had episodes sitting on my DVR unwatched for weeks because I knew they were going to be awful.
I hated that episode mostly because of that one scene where she was on the dunking stool and seemed so helpless and out of control. I just couldn't see that happening to any other Doctor. Most of them would have talked him into switching places with them in five minutes.
It'll probably be retconned eventually, if not with this show runner than with a future one.
@@StillJustDreaming Not this one for sure. I'm pretty sure, if the show survives, to get a new showrunner they will clean house and undo all this mess.
Given the nature of the show, it wouldn't be hard. The hard part would be convincing fans that it's worth coming back.
"..and the Timeless Children can just piss off for a moment" 😂🤣
The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances made The Doctor so happy. The war on his home planet, really took a lot out of him.
With regards to the "I would recognise a time lord", inconsistency. Tom Baker's Doctor explained that he had been severed from the Time Lord collective subconsious when he stole the Tardis and became a renegade. So maybe later regenerations forgot that he would not automatically recognise another time lord.
Just a little side note, when JW escaped Gallifrey after sending her family back in a house shaped Tardis, she then escaped in a tree before getting snatched away to prison. So there is still another Tardis standing in the quarry. Food for thought, if her Tardis is dying maybe pop in grab a few spares or maybe more.
I am amazed you didn't include classic who, the 3rd doctor, shot and murder an ogron, 6 poisoned shockeye, push 2 people into an acid bath, 7 destroyed the cybermen, blew up the entire Skaro system, where was the moral compass then.
Also the regeneration limit was addressed in classic who, timelords could be offered a new cycle, the 5 doctors they offer the master a new cycle. so moffat did not put himself into a corner, the new cycle has been there for a long time.
And don't forget, the Fourth Doctor used a de-mat gun to kill Sontaran Commander Stor in "The Invasion of Time."
I had an arguement with Cokin Baker about that acid bath.
The no guns thing was more a "No being armed when that can get you in trouble" thing in Classic. Tennant hated guns because he was still having a 'no more never again' attitude to the Time War. It's not a hard and fast rule.
In "The Five Doctors" the Time Lords offered a new set of regenerations to the Master, so what happened in "The Time of the Doctor" was within the rules of the show.
Heck, they litterally ressurected the Master for the Time War along with a new set of Regenerations, if they can do that, then giving a new set of Regenerations to the Doctor is really no big deal
The inconsistency of the Weeping Angels pretty much sums up my main problem with Steven Moffat. He's just like George Lucas in that he has good ideas and intentions, but likes to change things and doesn't know when to stop. That image of an Angel becomes an Angel thing would be fine if it Moffat had just simply left it at videos of Angels coming to life, but, of course, he had to go too far and do the Angel in the mind thing which creates all sorts of continuity problems and negates the whole purpose of looking at Angels to stop them.
As for the TARDIS not translating the Hath, Martha seemed to be able to understand what the Hath were saying, so it's possible that the translation was working for the characters, but not for the audience.
Ten just lost it after losing everyone else.
Edit: s p e l l i n g
He could be very dark.
word
@@emptyvoices31 like what he did to sycorac leader and the racnos
losing
@@susanlawens3776 thanks-
The Doctor: Breaks the rules of time
The doctor: Doing it with good intentions
The time lords: Understandable, have a great day :)
during the three doctors serial, the timelords themselves allowed the 3 doctors of the time to gang up to save the universe from collapsing. This and The Day of The Doctor seems to be the only times they justified breaking the rules of time for the ultimate greater good.
They didn't really justified it though... they accept it as a solution but they were very aware it was against their laws... basically it was both an End of the World situation where if they didn't accept it, they'd all die and their laws wouldn't matter.. so less justified and more them accepting it as an exception, imo xD
There's probably an example of the doctor breaking rules in every episode... Doctor Who's rules are fluid and always changing to fit the show, this is overall probably a good thing.
Dr Who cannon for an episode is basically what the screenwriters/directors/actors remember for a specific episode.
8:34
There’s actually 3 TADSES!
The doctors, House and Tree Tardis!
Forgot about the Tree! Maybe we"ll see that one again someday. And aren't Clara and Ashildr still running around in one?
@@StillJustDreaming Correct, and Jack had one in Torchwood although we dont know if it survived Miracle Day
@@StillJustDreaming Which episode is the Tree Tartis?
@@graybradley3578 It's near the end of the episode "The Timeless Children"
@@alasdairmaclean2448 In which episode od Torchwood Jack had his own Tardis?
For number 3, it's believed that time takes care of itself in extreme situations such as the contact and presense of two strong characters at the same by either removing the previous one, as seen in Father's day, or erases the memories if the time-lines overlapse, as said it Galifrey falls, no more. But what accually needs to be answered is the extremely terrible event of someone touching him or herself causing the inevetable paradox, unless with the use of a paradox machine!
What makes me laugh in revolution of the daleks is how all those daleks just fly into the lure TARDIS like sheep and all get destroyed; literally one dalek could have gone and killed the doctor! They really are so dumb sometimes considering they’re the deadliest killing machine in the universe 😂
they went and become more and more stupid with each successive incarnation since around doc4.
which, granted, it somewhat does make sense with how some milestones of said incarnations has been set up (civil war anyone?) but... they just don't quite get to the exterminating before actually talking about doing it
the only rationale is that darlek are all individually motivated...they all wanted to be the one that killed the Doctor ... don't think of them as an army with coordination or a plan ... their orders on the Doctor is to kill at all costs.... by this logic they would all individually go after the Doctor ... there were also more in the ship that got destroyed separately so sending in the field troops would have also made sense as there were more in the ship if that didn't work.
@@graybradley3578 Quite rational reason with good motivation. But we shouldn't forget that the TARDIS is also 'bigger on the inside'. Some might even say infinite in size. So it might have been to limit the doctors movements. Because if only 1 Dalek went in, the Doctor could make it run in circles all day long (home field advantage and all), while many Daleks could spread out and limit movement/exterminate her faster.
There was also the opportunity to capture a TARDIS which, despite Dalek technological development and the Time War etc., would still be a major acquisition for them. The living metal (validium?) itself would be substantial spoils of conquest even without killing The Doctor. Although I'm by no means the biggest lore-hound out there, as far as know only the Monan Host were ever able to create time ships to rival or surpass Gallifreyan TARDISes , although they never achieved dimensional transcendence, so the Daleks would definitely love to take control of a TARDIS. And, having destroyed the Defence Drones, they kind of had nothing better to do.
@@DavidBeddard that makes sense. especially if we take into consideration the dalek time controller
When it comes to Daleks the post time war doctors throw any rules they have out the window.
One thing I never was able to grasp was when the doctor regenerated, he almost always had a crisis afterwards either a bout where he had amnesia or needed to have a good rest. Any other timelord could regenerate and be perfectly fine. Some like Romana could actually choose what they looked like.
most of their "deaths" were traumatic as well
1sts was old age and radiation poisoning
2nd was executed
3rd was also radiation poisoning
5th was just poisoned
7th was shot and had a bad reaction to the anesethetic (sp?)
10 was also radiation poisoning
Romana was also much smarter than he, graduating with a much higher score
timelords can choose to regenerate at any time, if they do it without being killed they can choose their form, and probably dont suffer the personality crisis
9:10
If it's the master's tardis, It's possible he did something to it that had already effectively killed it irrevocably. Seems like the sort of thing he'd do. He did cannibalise the doctor's into a paradox machine after all, but thankfully that was reversible.
No, that wasn't the Master's TARDIS. We last saw that one in _Spyfall._
The 'house' TARDIS apparently destroyed in _Revolution of the Daleks_ was just a random TARDIS picked up from Gallifrey in _The Timeless Children._
@@Grizzly01 Wasnt that even supposed to be a TARDIS that isnt used anymore so it made no sense it was there?
@@DeadlyRivfader perhaps then the lifeform of that TARDIS had been moved elsewhere, leaving just the disused machine.
Or maybe the Master killed all the TARDISes when he destroyed gallifrey - this one seems more likely than the first.
@@alansmithee419 Im still new to the Who universe so the thing regarding the TARDIS models is a bit fuzzy but as I understand it the TARDIS was a model that wasnt used anymore at that time meaning it shouldnt have been there at all unless the Master for some reason decided to put it there for anyone to take.
For regeneration energy, 11th used energy to heal river and he ended regenerating into an old man, so I think we have already saw using regeneration energy backfiring.
He chose his face
Regeneration energy he shouldn't really have had. Plus he was given a new set of regenerations post this anyway.
he didnt regenerate into an old man, he just got old, Time Lords live roughly 1000 years per incarnation then regernerate, its only trouble loving twats like the doctor that burn through their regeneration so quick, 11th was the only one to live a normal time lord life span
@@julieeverett7442 Robin means that 11 regenerated into 12.
12 being an old man.
@@Grizzly01 true, but he chose that face to remind himself of his purpose
That RTX joke made me chuckle, thanks for that.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed the Doctor failing to instantly recognise Missy and O's incarnations of the Master.
For #4, About crossing into their own timelines, I believe Day of the Doctor showed that the past versions will forget their encounters from their future, which explains why 11 didn’t know what would happen next after meeting 10, and could also apply for timelords in general as I think something similar happened between the master and missy in the season 10 finale.
The only exception that I can remember, however, is the paradox between 5 and 10 in that doctor who short before the titanic episode
Where rose saved her doomed daddy from death by dangerous driving.
love that
Blink is easily one of my favourite episodes because of its tension and I didnt mind them being brought back in flesh and stone because of the cool twist about the characters not realising that the statues should've had 2 heads but when we saw the statues move, everything was ruined because we achieved the impossible and now it doesnt seem like they're lightning fast and can move metres within nanoseconds, that just ruined it
"and the Timeless Children can just piss off for the moment!" - if I could subscribe to your channel twice I would subscribe a second time for that statement!
Der zehnte Doktor ist cool
The translation thing with the Tardis could just be a whim of the Tardis as well to not spoil the Doctor on his adventures.
Since it is established that the Tardis is sentient and has a strong empathic link with the Doctor.
7:48 Yeah this part still doesn't make sense to me. I understand that timelords can regenerate. But didn't the tenth doctor explain that regeneration still feels like death? He explained that it feels like a new face and person just takes over. So, didn't he still just forced a friend to go through regeneration? ( taken around 1:20 in this video from the episode - ruclips.net/video/2Ie61iL9Jzs/видео.html )
Even if you ignored all of that, that still is a life being taken away. It is known that Timelords can regenerate only so many times. The Doctor got away with this rule, but not other timelords. Which in meaning, he still made the general closer to death even if he didn't actually kill him.
Don't forget that the Master acquired a 14th incarnation in Keeper of Trakon and was offered a new regeneration cycle in The Five Doctors
That’s still the 13th Master, he just stole Tremis’ body.
Actually, I have a theory that covers your last one. The Tardis is alive, she and the Doctor do communicate (in their own way), so maybe the Tardis let the Doctor know that she was on board with being destroyed if it meant saving the Earth. It wouldn't even be the first time we've seen this - the Tardis was willing to burn herself up to fill in for the non existent sun so that life on Earth would continue (in The Big Bang)
I've always loved the "Never cruel nor cowardly". Especially when he drowned the racknoss babies under them river Thames, or destroyed an entire cyberman fleet to ask a simple question. Oh and every encounter with anything Dalek shaped. Like when he found the dalek supreme in a crashed ship and taunted it before looting its data banks. Yeah. God guy that doctor
In the Five Doctors special the Master was summoned to Gallifrey to help the Doctor who had been kidnapped in 5 of his incarnations with 4 of them landing in the Death Zone. The Time Lords offered the Master a 'whole new regeneration cycle' as incentive to go. In Underworld the Doctor talks about the Minyons who were given technical help by the first Time Lords to advance their civilisation - and who then kicked them off the planet and went to war destroying it. Before the end they launched a spacecraft to try to locate the P7E which held the genetic race bank. The crew were in the mission for hundreds of years and used a system of forced regenerations - over and over again. There is a line about the body being renewed but the spirit being weary of endless life. And in Mordryn undead the crew of the ship had been experimenting on themselves with a symbiotic metamorphosis generator to give themselves the same ability as the Time Lords. So technically the new cycle of regenerations 'gifted' the Doctor by the Time Lords did not break cannon. The Timeless Child trying to tell us that there had been thousands of Doctors and zillions of regenerations did not so much BREAK tradition as liquidize it and flush it down the toilet.
Probably my most hated inconsistancy with the angels is when theyre reintroduced. In Blink Ten said, "No choice, its a FACT of their biology,. In the sight of any living thing, they ℹ ITERALLY TURN TO STONE." But, in Flesh and Stone, Eleven says, "They're scared and their instincts will take over. Walk like you can see." That really irked me because of the blatent controdiction.
I think in Father’s Day the reason for the reapers appearing was explained by there being two versions of rose and the doctor present when rose changed time and saved pete, so therefore it was a weak point in time
Actually it was explained by the Doctor that the Timelords would normally prevent the reapers from going on a rampage like that and fix whatever damage they caused, but with their absence in the universe the reapers were now free to cause havoc.
For the angles one it is consistent, the pictures of the angles in blink actually did become angles, there were the angles we saw in the house, almost making it a time loop, because the angles were created from the pictures of themselves.
"The Timeless child can piss off"
*Talks about the doctor using regeneration energy and it not effecting his regeneration*
Almost as if that wouldve answered your question
I think the whole “Time Lord Detection” thing was honestly just 10 trying to make himself feel more confident. Reassuring himself that he’d recognize a Time Lord, even if he never actually possessed that skill
for the Doctor using guns thing, it may be a new who thing where the Doctor against using guns (for the most part), but in classic who, he used guns multiple times like in Resurrection of the Daleks, Peter Davidson's 5th Doctor used a gun to shoot and kill a Dalek mutant without a second thought, and i think is was in the Invasion of time where Tom Baker's 4th Doctor used a gun against the Sontarans that were invading Gallifrey
Breaking the Rules
Watching in Schools.
In digital Applications
The Greatest Sensations
Doctor Who
I always assumed that the Tardis only translates what is needed… we see the doctor speak baby, Judoon and the other alien languages that don’t get translated.
So in my head canon it’s basically automatically translating the languages that the doctor cannot understand/speak already, with the exception of the very few languages outside of the knowledge of time lord tech.
I think it makes sense and fits and it’s my canon until proven otherwise.
I thought it was funny when, in "Journeys End," Davros described the Doctor as "the man who never carries a gun," despite Peter Davison's Doctor in "Resurrection of the Daleks," coming in with a Dalek gun, and calmly announcing to Davros that he was there as his executioner.
Thus far, as a lifelong Whovian (as a young child visiting England in 1966 with the family, we saw the second Peter Cushing Dalek feature film in cinema in its original release, my becoming a lifelong fan of Daleks and the concept of the TARDIS; then watching the TV series once the Tom Baker episodes began airing in America in the late 1970s, and once it moved to PBS, I was able to see every single episode that was then currently available), I consider all of Jodie Whitaker's era to be an alternate universe, non-canonical fever dream (particularly the illogical "Doctor Ruth"/Timeless Child concept).
Having "Doctor" Ruth's buried TARDIS being shaped as a police box is not only ridiculous, but is absolutely contradictory of the origins of the series: in the second episode Susan explains to Ian and Barbara about the ship's chameleon circuit, describing several shapes in which the TARDIS's outer shell has taken (including but not limited to a sedan chair), so if Doctor Ruth was a pre-Hartnell doctor, where is Susan, and how is her TARDIS even a police box...?
It is clear that Chris Chibnel hates Doctor Who only slightly less than he loathes the show's fan base.
I just finished the New Doctor Who (2005 on) and the Torchwood series. I seem to recall an episode where the Doctor explained the call box design as being the chameleon circuit of the Tardis was non functioning and he had gotten around to fixing it.
RUclipsrs keep mentioning that DR WHO has been running for 58 years - but seem only to have watched the last 16 years...
thank you!!!!!! Exactly!
Who cares?
@@CalzaRage because there is 26 years and seven doctors the modern who fans have never seen and some of them leave the modern doctors in the dust!!!
@@julieeverett7442 And how am i exected to watch all of them when many episodes are unavailable and many are hard to find unless you pay dumb prices for the dvd's : )
@@CalzaRage PlutoTV streaming service has early Doctor Who.
I suppose they're using the regenerative aspect to a more broader spectrum. If the regeneration energy not only changes their biology and healing them, they might be able to put them in hiatus for other usages like David Tennant when it came to Doctor Donna and the Meta-Crisis Doctor. There are some things the Doctor doesn't know he would do, because time is not something he can predict but travel through. Of course, him sparing his regenerative energy did come in handy a few times, how he helped Darvos even if Darvos never wanted the Doctor's help.
I haven't watched Series 12, yet. I'm struggling to summon the motivation and videos like this don't help, LOL.
With the timelords it could be explained by saying that its docotr is different from the next atomically so its allowed for them to encounter each other since they aren't atomically the same person
More importantly regarding the Statue of Liberty: a) it's not made of stone and b) How is it ever be able to move? It's the most iconic symbol in the city that never sleeps. There will always be someone looking at it, making it always quantum-locked.
Best thing about Chib's run is a future showrunner has a bunch of stories of which to draw from in terms of consequences
Like the TARDIS she killed, the spiders she let starve, or anyone she's let die and we didn't explicitly SEE die
Everywhere i go i am reminded of that fucking Timeless Child bullshit
The RTX joke hit too close to home, thanks a bunch.
The Master got his second cycle after The Five Doctors, as a reward for helping take down Borusa. He was melted into goop by the Daleks, which likely did it in a way to keep him from regenerating.
He then got yet another new cycle after the High Council resurrected him, which means he’s on his 4th self of his 3rd cycle right now.
At least 4th. We don’t know for sure if there were any incarnations between Simm!Master and Missy, right?
They only offer him the set if he helps The Doctor. He agrees and The Doctor doesn't accept his help. Nothing is said after this to show he was given a new set.
The Master is in his second set of regenerations following his resurrection to fight in the Time War.
he used to have gotten only 12 lives but then Chibnall said lulz regeneration go brrrr.
I think the Doctors all fall on a spectrum between two extremes. One side being more like the war Doctor and the other side is more hopeful and tries to follow the rules. Every now and then old personality traits from past Doctors pops up due to each Doctor being all of his incarnations and an individual person at the same time.
I like the not so subtle ripping into the most recent doctor doing arguably the worst stuff (the writer not the actor)
i use to get really weird about inconsistencies in this show, but then i started throwing human knowledge into the question such as; each race and nation has different cultures so if some weeping angels prey on people via the terrifying aspects of blink but they might have sub cultures such as the ones in matt smiths era who were also relatively terrifying because they did things different.
The "agency" that resets the Doctors memories after every 12 regenerations seems to have disappeared when Matt Smith's death was near. Unless, I suppose, they somehow knew the Time Lord's were gonna "gift" him more even though he didn't need them being the Timeless Child. Oh you Timey Wimey complicated-ness!
we knew the regeneration limit was poppycorn since the master (and, later, omega in the secondary canon), but TC just screwed up majorly
For number four, in Father's Day, Rose changed her past by saving her father, but she wouldn't have known to save him, or even gone back to when he died, because of the change. In the other cases, the changes didn't prevent themselves, except that Christmas one, although that could probably be explained as the man forgetting.
Regeneration is essentially limited by the law of the Time Lords. However, they can grant exceptions and revive dead Time Lords whenever they feel it's necessary.
Also, we know that The Doctor tends towards the darker side when not traveling with someone. After losing Amy and Rory, The Doctor essentially stayed in Victorian London, brooding all the while. He meets and loses Clara and goes off into hiding again in a monastery until the original Clara calls him.
The 10th Doctor also made a number of questionable decisions when without a companion.
I have a theory about the imploding TARDIS. What if it didn't actually implode and die but folded its external dimensions so tight that it became microscopic, effectively imprisoning the Daleks rather than killing them, kinda like a makeshift Genesis Ark. I'm gonna assume she wrecked the controls so that the Daleks didn't end up with a TARDIS though.
0:27- when you hated time of angels/flesh and stone and the angels take Manhattan, then you realise the weeping angels will return in S13.
The Statue Of Liberty as an angel was bloody stupid. Whoever wrote it obviously didn't realise that it's not made of stone: it's copper sheets on a steel frame - nearer a building than a statue. And the idea was done better in 'Ghostbusters II'.
I don't think you can call the Time Lords giving The Doctor a new set of regenerations a Deus Ex Machina.
It was established in The Five Doctors that the Time Lords can grant a new set to any Time Lord...as they offer The Master if he helps The Doctor during that special.
Not really an ass pull if it's something that had, at that point, been established for 30 years
yep
Actually Timeless child makes that seem less stupid. If it something that has been grafted on to Gallifrey physiology then it can be augmented, something that had naturally evolved not so much
As bad as the timeless child plot is, (from my understanding) I do appreciate what what Chibnel was trying to do and give doctor who the potential to go on forever but it was such a big pile of piss the way he did it.
you’ve given him a single episode since the revelation to fix it, but you RTD and Moffat 7 series to explain the time war??? fuck off
@@william...1 dude, chill the fuck out. I'm sorry if I have offended you but if you haven't seen the new years episode, he made it clear that we have to deal with it.
@@william...1 the time war plot worked cause they took seven seasons, they didnt just info dump the entire war in a 2 parter
there was teasing and clues and build up, the timeless child was just "oh btw youre magic now or w/e" there was no build up
@@paleoleft the way you just invalidated your whole point. you’ve given the man two episodes to explain something on the scale with something else that took 7 seasons. all the time war stuff was actually dumped in end of time and then again in day of the doctor, so it wasn’t subtle.
@@william...1 no it wasnt subtle, it didnt need to be, but there was a clear idea of what happened during the time war
chibnall is leaving next season so the timeless child plot is either gonna be rushed, unfinished, or retconned
You made me laugh with that comment regarding the timeless children pissing off...Thank you
That episode with the other Tardis’ was fucking hilarious to me when all the daleks started piling into it like a fucking clown car.
I am breaking rules. I'm watching this on my work time.
it’s almost like moffat makes it up as it goes and doesn’t care for canon
The whole being able to recognise a time lord thing has a simple explanation, he could recognise the master as harold saxon when he knew the master was out there and he was looking for him, but the doctor wasn't looking for missy or O and didn't know the master was alive either of those times.
mostly right
10 the thirteen rule, it was established in classic who that on very very VERY rare occasions the high council of Gallifrey can grant another cycle, the master was granted one to find the doctor in the 5 doctors, so having the council making a crack and granting a cycle to the doctor was not that strange.
Recognizing other time lords, yes they can IF their pure time lord. 4th doctor for several stories the master was a rotting husk as he had used all thirteen lives, he continued by stealing another mans body (Keeper of Traken - look it up) The master is no longer pure Gallifreyian!
Not killing people, er have you seen 5th and 7th? They were ruthless little buggers, 5th shot a cyberman in the chest and on another occasion stuffed gold dust in ones chest, suffocating them. 7th tricked Davros to blow up scaro.
Crossing the time streams 3, 5 2 and day of the doctor, EVERY single time it was not them that initiated them crossing their time lines. Three doctors the council of time lords pulled doctors 1and 2 out of their stream to help 3rd as he was having some real problems
5 doctors they were scooped up and dropped on Gallifrey to play a dumb game
2 doctors 2nd got in real trouble and 6th got pulled back to help him or he wouldnt exist
day of the doctor, that was the moment wasnt it.
Only fathers day had non outside interferance, hence the reapers THEY deliberately broke the law
do some research doctor who is 57 years old, not 16!!!!!
Maybe it was the only way to get rid of the Daleks and/or the TARDIS consented.
it breaks its own rules every episode
I think you forgot an important part of killing a TARDIS: that killing a TARDIS (at least while its consciousness is still inside) will cause damage on par with a Sun going supernova. It literally ended the universe in 11's era; removing the consciousness so that the TARDIS could be *safely* eaten was a part of the Doctor's Wife; etc.
regeneration energy really did a number on future iterations of the doctor. Capaldi was old and to some degree senile for the first few episodes. and Whittaker was missing an appendage, half her brain, and the sense of general politeness and respect for all. you say it was ignored, I say it explains the sudden drop in quality after Matt smith left the stage.
Amy and Rory's sacrifice to create the paradox in "Angels take Manhattan" is the reason the Statue of Liberty doesn't walk around town
I don't even care about the timeless child reveal because I'm still more pissed that Chibnal felt the need to explode Gallifrey again. Why? We had *just* gotten it back and only had one or two episodes with it. What a waste.
It was a waste
For the 'not spotting time lords' thing. I would give The Master a pass, given, they're The Master. They probably found a way around it so they could mess with the Doctor more
You probably wont read this but these are the connections ive found regarding me and a reoccuring theme of "aliens" "space" and "time travel" SO FAR:
Im what you call an indigo child,i was born sick and premature on september 8 1985 a blonde straight haired fat baby.
I was kind of a weird kid,adults trusted me and i had a strong sense of intuition.In my childhood there is a theme
of "aliens" space" and time travel".I was obsessed with et (alien) and then i saw terminator 2 in theaters and i was
hooked (time travel).When i was 8 i got really into astronomy and meteors and asked my dad for a telescope (space).
Then i learned about astrology (space).When i was 7 or so i used to wear a labcoat around the neighborhood and
say i was a scientist. (space?lol)I loved a movie called weird science and the character gary had curly hair
and i really wanted curly hair so in the 6th grade it darkens and starts to curl.Anyway these are minor things
heres the meat of it.So my friends kept telling me to watch this show doctor who but i refused because it was british.
It kept coming up and one day i go to a convention in my homestate of oklahoma.I see the tardis which is a police phone
box and i see ths interesting old man with a question mark umbrella and i see that NO ONE is talking to him.I feel kind of bad for him and he seemed pretty interesting so i go up to him and say "so whats this doctor who all about?" he excitedly gasps and explains this story of a time traveling alien that changes his appearance when he dies but is still the same person,he is thousands of years old and he goes around helping people and saving them.He even said that i looked like the 10th doctor who would be my favorite.Anyway i love the show and decide ive never related to a character more and decide i should play him so i write this season and i have some cool things in it like meeting edison and tesla and the return of old villains.As i research some of teslas work i come across this ufo that uses an electron accumulator to raise its magnetic vibrational frequency to match its environment and achieve zero point and begin to teleport.Ralph ring explains that the craft is flown telepathically and that it is to be regarded to as a friend as in its an alive energy field much like doctor whos tardis.Ralph explains that they went
back in time and he couldnt immediately remember the journey as our brains have trouble retaining it so memories are
fragmented.The maker of this crafts name is otis and my middle name is odis.Otis winds up taking a dummy craft of
the otcx-1 to oklahoma my home state.In the 2005 reboot of doctor who "oklahoma " is said 3 times.The very first episode
of doctor who aired november 23rd 1963 a day after the jfk assasination.My grandpa was given a wallet by his daughter
from a family friend who suggested she het it and went and had the wallet made which grandpa odis wore till he died.
The family friend was jack ruby,the man who shot lee harvey oswald in the jfk assasination.Two minor mentions of jfk
and time travel are in the unbrella academy and 11-22-63 by stephen king.The 7th doctor (th interesting old man i met
in oklahoma who explained doctor who to me) first premeired on september 7th 1987 a day before my 2nd birthday.
So one day on easter 2019 i ask god to show me a sign and i asked if i could be doctor who if i worked hard enough.
An orange orb appeared moving other worldly but i dismiss it looking for a meteor "thats not a meteor because meteors
flash" right as i say flash a green meteor like object darts across the sky.I was STUNNED my brain couldnt handle it
and i started thinking i was jesus.Then i layed on the bed and thats when i envisioned a gray alien trying to talk to
me with this black cube.One night an old episode of the 4th doctor just popped on.The doctor meets a god like figure and asks him to retreive the key of time which is a cube like the tesseract and much like a majestic 12 ex member account of et tech that is a black cube responsible for accessing stargates for travel into other dimensions.Anyway i was unsure if i just imagined that since it was in my mind but i felt smarter.i start getting manic and doig crazy stuff so my dad has me committed for a week and i NEEDED it.After i regained my sanity after having what is called a kunalini awakening in which a serpent of energy runs through your chakras filling you with oneness with the lord and bliss ive never felt before.I stayed out on my ex bosses property and kept kinding snakes,3 total one a giant green snake that just layed there and let me pick it up.So while this is going on the new season of doctor who comes out and they have an episode with edison and tesla like my episode and at the end of the finale it is evealed that doctor who is essentially god...like i thought i was.i also forgot to mention i found a patent for a
time machine and the person who registered it lives in tulsa oklahoma which is where i live...whe i got out of the
mental ward i was diagnosed with bipolar which is a mood disorder.The 6th doctor also had a mood disorder and tried
to choke his companion.He has blue eyes and curly hair and kind of looks like me along with the 10th doctor.in series
12 of doctor who a curly haired character named charlie is revealed the villain and collapses to his death.Anyway thats
all i have so far but i feel like this was set up or something,its blowing my mind.I should also mention that in numerology
my life path was a 4 and when i had my awakening i my lifepath 22 and became what is called the master builder and the manifestor
of dreams.So in conclussion i deduce that i am the real doctor...somehow.
With crossing timelines I think we can link this with the new Loki series and how due to there always being a natural disaster of some sorts nothing can occur due to it already either being destroyed or going to be and that’s why the reapers have only appeared in that one episode due to there not being a natural disaster of sorts to effect the change of the outcome but with the other episodes there have such as the destruction of Gallifrey or The cybermen takeover with the two masters
Actually, the rule of 13 has been established as flexible for a while. It's been established for a while that a time lord can take another timelord's regenerations. That's one of the things that the Master has done (or at least attempted to do). Then again, the rule of 13 was a retcon itself.
When the TARDIS doesn't translate a language, it's because of the fact that it doesn't translate for whatever reason. For example, Gallifreyan probably doesn't translate intentionally by design. Timelords probably don't want other races to reach the level of technology that they have (timelords are real assholes, aren't they?). And then there are languages too old to translate. And there are probably languages that simply can't translate, similar to how River was named River because of a translation error with a language that doesn't have a translation for Pond.
When it comes to crossing timelines, I think it's more an argument that you're not allowed to interfere with your own timeline. And interacting would cause a paradox. When it comes to timelords, however, I think they do have a way to compensate. They are simply prevented from remembering past lives. That way, their present selves can't be affected by interacting with their past selves. The 1st Doctor never remembered the 2nd, 3rd, and 12th Doctors. The 2nd Doctor never remembered the 3rd Doctor. The War Doctor never remembered the 10th and 11th. The 10th will never remember the 11th or the interaction with the War Doctor because of that affiliation. Saxon doesn't remember meeting Missy, which Missy specifically points out. And as for Ruth, that's just an entirely different can of worms.
Gallifrey Falls No More refers to a specific event. And even if it didn't, do you really think the Doctor would've had enough foresight to foresee what would happen in the future? ...Actually, don't answer that. Bad choice of words.
As for killing a TARDIS, despite the idea that I've never known that to be a rule (and the "no guns" thing was more of a preference, probably because of the War Doctor), a TARDIS has a symbiotic relationship with its timelord. But what does that mean for a TARDIS that has no timelord? The TARDIS would eventually die of old age (technically it will deteriorate without a timelord's regeneration energy). Basically, I think it's just more complicated than we know of.
I think the reasons subsequent angels new mechanics were asdded after the first become pretty popular and they just wanted to add more to it. If this was the case, then that would be why there were inconsistencies later on, tho i think the liberty statue being an angel was too much for me lol.