IVG: 10 years until the end of infertility | Just Might Work
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
- “In a 50 year timeframe this could become the default way that people choose to have children.”
Subscribe to Freethink on RUclips ► freeth.ink/you...
Up Next ► Uterus transplants: A step closer to overcoming infertility • Uterus Transplants: A ...
In vitro gametogenesis (IVG): It might sound like science fiction, but someday, we may be able to convert human skin cells into viable human egg and sperm cells.
This technology would allow for same-sex couples and those struggling with infertility to have biological children of their own.
But here’s the catch: So far, IVG only has been successfully performed in mice. However, a fast-moving startup in Berkeley, California is on the road to making it a reality.
Watch on Freethink.com ► www.freethink....
◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠
Read more of our stories on infertility:
Can a lab-grown uterus treat infertility?
► www.freethink....
Breaking the taboo of male infertility
► www.freethink....
How GMO zebrafish could inspire new infertility treatments
► www.freethink....
◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡
Watch our original series:
► Hard Reset: freeth.ink/you...
► Just Might Work: freeth.ink/you...
► Challengers: freeth.ink/you...
◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠
About Freethink
No politics, no gossip, no cynics. At Freethink, we believe the daily news should inspire people to build a better world. While most media is fueled by toxic politics and negativity, we focus on solutions: the smartest people, the biggest ideas, and the most ground breaking technology shaping our future.
◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡
Enjoy Freethink on your favorite platforms:
► Daily editorial features: www.freethink.com
► Solutions-based stories, straight to your inbox: www.freethink....
► Facebook: / freethinkmedia
► Instagram: / freethink
► Twitter: / freethinkmedia
► Join the Freethink forum: / freethinkforum
What do you think of IVG?
It will have applications that I don't like or agree with, but I guess that's part of progress.
Technology that should be developed and only used when humanity is on the brink of extinction, not under any other circumstances.
@@crossjames9577 not even then. If we accidentally delete ourselves then so be it. Why bring more people into our failed situation and expect them to deal with it. It's too irresponsible and cruel.
The 'growing Organs from iPSCs' aspect appears promising for medical applications; creating gametes without meiosis is scientifically interesting.
Considering our fertility rate is plummeting due to environmental chemical contamination (lookin' at you, plastics), this will likely be a necessity for the continuance of human civilisation (if we can overcome global climate collapse first, that is). Bring it on, consequences and all - better than extinction, after all.
Those ladies who have lost their reproductive system due to tumor or similar disease, for them it will be a blessing. I wholeheartedly believe this will succeed soon.
Yeah. God has given them blessing and he will provide a secured future in their endeavors of conceiving a child.
@@MyFirstHandle Many thanks for your nice words. May God bless you 🙏
I hope its within 10 years or less like theyre saying this sounds so beautiful
my hopes is someday soon trans gender males-to-females can have a natural womb and there DNA ( unGMO/un-designers baby ) own eggs and can nurture nurse ( i still have overly sensitive nipples for a male-role ) ect so the full experience of motherhood can be experienced
i was born 1988-95 intersexual ( and BI sexuality and at one point in my lifetime i tried to for me being monogyny and female marriage and tried hard to over compensate macho man, sorry im not that way even as a man i like more than one female at the same time, i just can't picture having sexual activity's with 2 dick's in the room it's a turn off for me aka gay-sex ( tried it 🤢not for me/dick-X2 or at least not my type of guy-male ) or swinging, but if a had eggs id be in to fit dad-bod guy's as a example ) but forced under 3 to be a male ( and now im 6+ft lall and as a woman i wouldn't want that as 5ft/short is were it's at for passing and looking in the mirror and being happy inside with my self ect ) andthe lack of kids and passing as a woman made me to were i had to make personal peace with it
Would also be a game changer for mammal conservation!
Great point! We did a whole video on the quest to preserve the Northern White Rhino, which had no fertile pairs left in the species. It might be far simpler if this technology is established. ruclips.net/video/ViCq-muwr7g/видео.html
I am 100% infertile and this would be AMAZING. I really hope this becomes a thing sooner than later too.
pray that every day! it will open a new revolution in biology.
We hope so .pray for this ❤
This company announced last week that they could have viable eggs within the year, it’s thrilling to imagine I could have biological children in coming years
Where did you see this? Link?
WHERE? Give me the link pleaseee
@@jadenguyen6013 Conception Bio
@@Vanessa-nv1oh Conception Bio, from this video. They were interviewed by more than a couple of media sources in 2023. In the latest one they mentioned they had just had a breakthrough that they planned to send to trial phase within a year.
I know a family friend who is seriously desperate for a child, despite having over 3 miscarriages. This would really help her and her husband if it was actually completed to fruition in a short enough time span, and even though it most likely won’t, it would help all families and individuals for generations to come.
@@ursusursidae3527 she’s insistent on having a biological child to the point that she left for another country to try artificial insemination despite having over three miscarriages, and has already miscarried once during the procedure. She’s trying a second time, but I don’t think it’s going to end well.
People aren't deserving and capable to raise children!!! Birthing them into this world?!! Giving them to useless incompetent halfwhits to screw them up beyond any measure... might as well let hyenas raise them! The only responsible thing to do is to sterilize ourselves, period!!!
@@880-4 I hope her the best.
Why not just adopt one? There are hundreds of kids who needs parents.
@@NOName-nn3jv hundreds? I think you mean thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands..
IVG could end the need for organ donors so we could all make our own spare parts. Brilliant.
Yes maybe so im on for this advancement im praying this becomes reality before it's to late for me like less then 20 years. I see alit if positivity in this
@@danmulholland1634 Me too. But I live a healthy life at age 25, I would be 45 by then.
@@MyFirstHandle 45 isn't bad if you ask me older then ideal yeah maybe but ive seen it done
@@MyFirstHandle ill be 40 :(
i AM IN THE SAME THINKING, CAN WE BECOME FRIENDS? I HOPE IT WILL COME TRUE SOON AND ADOPTED SOON BY LAW IN ANY COUNTRY. THEN I WILL TRAVEL THERE TO DO WITH ANY PRICE.@@danmulholland1634
Wow, you guys need to do a follow up two years from now to see where this technology goes!
I think if people start creating children of someone without their consent and/or knowledge (think someone stealing a strand of hair from their favourite celebrity or just a friend they like) that has the potential to violate someone‘s bodily autonomy on the most fundamental level.
I think its great technology, but as always with such, it can pose great danger.
Every creations of human has its own pros and cons. But scientists only give humanity to well beings and they neglect the dark side of it.
Didn’t they say a blood sample would be needed? Even if it could be done with a strand of hair just make sure both parties are there agreeing. They’d have the DNA, not really a more accurate ID then that.
@@owenb6499 my thoughts exactly.
I agree! But I was also thinking maybe both parties should sign a contract before agreeing to make the child so no non-consensual children are made
Yeah, but for the same argument, you should have stopped sex for the sins of rape.
I'm on for this for me I dream for my own bio child before it's to late I don't want to say to much personal stuff but this sounds like a beautiful answer for my situation
Great, now we need start-ups that would produce good parents.
Can’t wait to see corporations growing their own workers!
Taking Company loyalty to a whole new level
would those created people be free to choose where to work, if they even want to ?
@@thrisbt1 it’s definitely one of the big reasons for us to be very cautious with technology like this. As weird as it sounds, if a company buys genetic material and makes a person from it, wouldn’t they then own that person? I’m not saying it would for sure go down that way, but there is a ton of gray area. We just need to be very careful, and move a lot slower, because of all the questions and problems this kind of technology will bring up.
@@refiningfire1000 why would they own the person ?
Lol🤣🤣🤣
hoping with all my heart that this will be possible soon 🤞
Me to I'm in a sad infertile situation myself I was told by lot of resources that this will be an option within 5-10 years for the average person I pray that's true
This is so incredibly awesome for trans people!
Doesn't matter if it works or not, it is about what it is used for.
Well thats the case with all tech lol
But to be profitable its gonna have to be useful to a large enough audience, so u cant just use this tech for eg. military purposes
I don't think we have a chance at colonizing other planets without having a great deal of mastery with selecting very specific genes for designer babies and genetically altered plants, animals and humans.
It could be nice to use it if astronauts suddenly lost their reproduction system to some cancers they received in radioactive areas of the universe. IVG would be the best solution to survive there. No more far-right traditionalists telling them that it's a bad thing. Please IVG supporters don't beat them up (those far-right activists).
Great! Very interesting. It would also be amazing if creative minds came together to think of solutions and help for all the children needing foster/adoptive homes too. If you want to be a parent and could offer an already living child a great home, this is a wonderful option that can change a life - even in addition to your own biological children. Doesn’t have to be “either or” x
There's a lot of great organizations working on advances here, too. We've been lucky to visit a town built around enabling foster families: ruclips.net/video/HYV1797mWk4/видео.html and an organization that helps provide an alternative to adoption or foster care when parents simply need support or relief. ruclips.net/video/DyyAzyOjJ78/видео.html
I’m licensed to adopt myself and it is not as simple to get a child as many people make it sound. Contrary to popular belief there are not THAT many kids in foster care, and those that are available for adoption get hundreds of applications from different families.
One of our biggest problems is not infertility, but is related to raising children, and that is the capacity to parent adequately. For all our self styled intellectual capacity, we are still unable to overcome the deeply debilitating effects on us of our own child hood trauma, such that, making informed and emotionally balanced, decisions as adults is almost impossible. It is these very personal challenges, that make raising children adequately, almost impossible. Look at the generation of millennials, inability to cope emotionally with the world that exists. As a result they are rushing head long toward the Metaverse for sanctuary.
Our biggest challenge as a species, is overcoming trauma that occurred in childhood, to then lead a productive adult life. But that doesn't happen. From the top of society down, people make decisions and behave based on the effects of childhood trauma (complex PTSD). The world is full of maladjusted people making life worse for themselves and others, because of tgeir psychology. Fix that problem, and maybe it will be worth creating human eggs for producing another generation who could live fulfilling lives.
Funny thing is parents who have to use IFV adoption and surrogacy to have children generally have the resources both financially and emotionally to raise children. Countless studies show children of these parents on average have much better outcomes than traditional families. So this is just another avenue for couples that are ready to be parents to be parents.
@@gurgleblaster2282 That's great news. A close friend of mine and his wife took advantage of the IVF program offered in our country. They ended up with two children a boy and a girl. As it was the fathers fertility that was the issue and the fertility is carried on the Y chromosome, his son will most likely be sterile to. Which means if he ever wanted children, he might have to use IVF.
I think we have multiple problems as a specie and that one you mentioned is someone else's job.
Many, if not most, childhood trauma and bad parenting comes from or is connected poverty - parents neglecting their children because they need to work multiple jobs, drug dependant parents using substances to deal with their problems, parents not being able to provide for their kids etc. etc. Treatments like IVF and possibly IVG are so expensive that it will probably never have any effect on the most voulnerable kids. Not to mention the children born from these treatments are always wanted and their parents have the recources to take care of them.
Not to mention that wealth is inherited and so the more kids the rich have the more their wealth gets spread out after their deaths so paradoxically the rich having many children could not only be good for the economy, but also for not cumulating wealth in the hands of a few which could in the long term have good effect on the poorest families as well.
(full disclosure I'm not an economist by any means and English isn't my native language so I wuite literally have no idea what I'm talking about.)
IVG could have a huge impact on cultural society. This can allow more access to gender equality and the diminishing discrimination towards LGBTQ+ and same-sex couples as the main reason for the discrimination is they can't conceive a child biologically.
There reason I want this to happens is because it destroys the primary argument to discriminate gay people.
I love this ! it's great news for males that want kids without waiting for years or paying fortunes to a female to have kids, because there's a big shortage of donor eggs while no shortage of donor sperm whatsoever.
Are we creating a brave new world? Should we?
We should stop them.
Please God, make this possible before my genetic cancer timebomb (Li Fraumeni Syndrome) comes to take me to see you.
What this video didn't say: Single straight men would use this, a lot. Not just gay men. There's a whole community online, mgtow, straight men who gave up on marriage to women. Fresh and Fit is one of their podcasts. Already about 1/2 of American children are born into single mom homes. Why not single straight dad homes?
@@Fourtune1 murderers are already such a low part of the population just because there’s one factor doesn’t mean it’s better for a father to raise the child
@@Fourtune1 Seeing as there are more single mother homes than single father homes, this makes for a flawed argument.
@@Fourtune1 your statement is an example of selection bias… it’s also categorically incorrect. Most single father families ………….don’t exist
@@Fourtune1 when single mothers are financially stable their children fair just as well as children raised in a two parent household. The violent offenders in prison came from homes if single mothers who weren't financially stable. Remember, America has the money but refuses to subsidize single parent homes, and poor, working poor, working class, and lower middle class families. And no our modern welfare system isn't enough.
My father and uncle were brought up by their mother who was abandoned by her husband after the birth of my uncle but you know what they grew up in a more healthier way than us but me and my siblings and my cousins we have both father and mother but no healthy communication with both people or proper nurture . It's like they think that bringing up the children in one father one mother household is important nothing else is important this is as if they were brainwashed by the society.
I think proper love and nurture is the secret of bringing up a law abiding and successful child even if there may be two parents or one parent or no parent.
Because many single mother or single father or even single parental figures have raise very very good children.
IVF is such a emotional rollercoaster. I shudder to think what the hormones would do to me, I can't even take hormonal birth control.
Hello fellow gays/lesbians 🥰
Our biggest problems are pollution, how to produce safe nutritious enough food and clean energy. We have enough people already lol.
So u wanna force people to only research stuff thats currently needed the most? Good luck on that lmao
I'm on for this ive seen infertility heart alot of hearts for life I feel saddened for those who cant have 1 of they're own I hope and firmly believe this will be available for people within 5-10 years like dr Sherman silber says it will or 20 none the less
I'm hoping it will be 10. So I won't have to be an older parent. 😭 this would be such a breakthrough
@@paulallen2919 agree and more likely well be in luck within 10-20 years instead of 20-40 luck since infertitly is going up sadly do to more processed chemicals in our foods, more animals are going endangered to extinct, we just gotta listen to the logic itself and not the emotion. incase you dont know China is about ready to bring back the Mammoth cause they managed to create an embryo for one, I Persoannly am trying to spread the word for this and the Infertitly of st Louis told me they are very confident it will be within 5-10 years and Law proffesor Hank greely says human trials at best will begin in 2030 in this day and age the better number of society is more and more opened minded then before
if there is an experiments to do from the company, i am willing to become voluntarily a ' white mouse' for them to try and make this come true.
@@jadenguyen6013 im on a 7 year list or maybe like 5 now at the infertitliy of st Louis Missouri dr Sherman silber office they confidently assured me ots within 10 yars away
Awesome, I’m a test-tube-baby. I love this stuff, fascinating!
Fascinating stuff, and I think a huge net positive for the world - particularly same sex and infertile couples. The only thing that makes me uncomfortable is the part where they’re making many embryos and letting the parents ‘decide’ their genetic traits by throwing away the ‘bad’ embryos.
Why? No one wants a defective baby
@@idontknowmuch3441 I feel bad for those other embryos not getting to exist :(
Are we sure they’re throwing them away?
it unfortunately already happens to some parents who find out during the marriage that they have Down Syndrome. I am disabled with Cerebral Palsy. I am happy for the technology that is coming. But i think people need imperfection. To see the beauty and happiness in the things that we take for granted.
@@El_Diablo_12 Well about choosing babies sex I'm also kinda sad. But about those embryo ig I'm not. Cuz deciding not to choose them is actually better than giving birth to them and let them suffer 🙂
Ten years away from not needing men for anything. There. Fixed it for you.
Very good
The CEO is very good.I pray and I hope every day they will make this come true soon. We will a better step in reproductive health and the very good revolution in the near future.
I'm sure this won't have any unforseen consequences.
@@UnKnownv5 You're right ethics have no place in science. Let's experiment on your family, for science.
Lmao any decision has good and bad consequences, its just a matter of profit risk ratio in the end
@@UnKnownv5 oh alr, thought this was about the individual case of potential parents deciding if they wanna go with this procedure in the future
What in the Brave New World is this?!
80 year old mom's club.
Social consequences?
Who cares. $$
you do not know how to use law to prevent this?? if they are millionaire, do you think it is not better than poor parents in africa but let a lot of children live in poverty?? which is better???? in developed country if you wanto get married overseas women or men, you must show how your finance is good enough , there are also laws which is necessary to prevent what you said.
Imagine having babies who are not accidental...
Unnatural selection accelerated. What happens when you do this generation after generation from only selected genetic material? Do you produce a monoculture like in crops?
That’s a concern I have too, we risk eliminating genes from humanity that we might need down the road. Natural selection has worked pretty darn great so far, it’s a dangerous game to interfere with it.
@@refiningfire1000 tbh, if we were at that stage at some point in the future we would prob have enough understanding to engineer those genes ourselfs :v
Also as for now this is just converting cells back to stemcell stage and into reproductive cells; this seems to still need 2 sets of dna thus this is no cloning => we dont loose any more genes than in the natural process; correct me if im wrong lol
Actually,Humanity by itself can still reproduce without relying on technology. It is just the fancy needs of it. Are modern people weaker than ever? Scientist are so obsessed with the world that humans are totally rely on technology. The selfish invention for development care so much for artificial human needs than our basic needs.
Ok but like what would be cheaper? Sex or having some advanced science lab make a baby. This’ll only really happen for those who need it. Genetic diversity wouldn’t be impacted.
I can only imagine the military potential of this.
You do raise an interesting point. If this technology gets into the wrong hands it could be extremely dangerous. I've spent most of my career working on issues pertaining to dual-use Technologies which means they could be used for civilian or for military purposes. Just imagine a country like Russia who has a declining population and is so desperate it's trying to Annex its neighbors at all costs. Clearly they don't seem to have a very good human rights record. They could easily retrieve blood from people, even unwittingly, and just make their babies, presuming there is a gestational womb, with that I'm sure could be acquired easily and secretly from all of the increasingly large numbers of prisoners. I'm sure if Hitler had this technology he would have going crazy making those Aryan babies. I'm sure the International Community would probably not like this and it would also cause a problem for civilian purposes. I just hope that the developers of this technology, as well as the US government pay attention to ensure its not being used to create humans for less than noble reasons. Another doomsday scenario is that it could be used to make babies to be bought and sold on the black market.
@@misse7154 Human advancement is always a double-edged sword, can't really put the genie back in the bottle.
@@theguywhodoes1 dual use technology has been around since the beginning of time: a flint; arrow; sharp cutting or harvesting instrument
@theguywhodoes1 I guess the more advanced technology got the wider range of tools are available to those seeking harm, and can enables them on a mass scale. While chemical weapons are considered a wmd, and they did kill a lot of soldiers on the battlefield in World War I, the lethality of one munition wasn't massive (although the cumulation was). Of course that's changed with the advent of nerve agents and different means of dissemination and aerosolization. Personally I look at 1945 as really being the first time a truly mass casualty or mass destruction causing weapon has been used. So the concern about dual-use Technologies is a modern phenomenon.
@@theguywhodoes1 Thats a good point especially when making Bioweapons, I mean think of the consequences of if Genetic editing birthed a being capable of using weaponized capabilities of animals found in nature or even some widely different but much deadlier mutation as a side effect of some unforeseen mutation of genes done through Crispr.
We don't need more.
You can't even keep the current 7 billion happy
That being said, science will carry our future
8 billion now
No one will forever be happy
Who is to say that it's not each individuals responsibility to be happy? It certainly isn't the governments responsibility, as you are responsible for your government. It also isn't your governments responsibility to keep other governments citizens happy.
Would that mean that a child could be created from the cells of a single adult? Turn some cells into eggs and others into sperm and make as many you's and you'd like?
Elon Musk just entered the chat.
In theory yes but in practice not really. Mixing your own cells to make a baby would be like incest, but worse. Recessive genes combining in weird ways. For the scenario you’re describing cloning is a better bet.
I wondered if Elon Musk is willing to support this biotech.... Maybe we can do it ourselves without Elon because investing the invention for IVG is very affordable for the non richest.
Elon you no worry about population decline. We have it under control! But it's very welcomed if you help us with the budget to make it less than 10 years hehe
@@MyFirstHandle I mean, he thinks we’re in decline so
You could also use this technology to make gametes out of stem cells derived from embryos directly: a process called somewhat pejoratively "In Vitro Eugenics" or IVE.
I think two individuals will be involved.
The founders & creator are definitely going to have ethical disagreements in the future
AND THAT is always from stupid and selfish people. we need to have law to do this. such as we only use cells from BONE MARROW which is difficult to take from a person and must have official legal papers before a hospital helps couples to have children. this will make A BIG REVOLUTION TO WOMEN, THEY CAN DELAY THE TIME FOR MAKING BABY OR THEY CAN AVOID DAMAGE FROM OPERATION TO HAVE BABY IN THE FUTURE. Then in the future we will have more couples who really love children. with the sex way, it is cheap but actually it creates so many bad situations which parents who have material calculation /purposes more than loving children and have responsibility to them.
why?
Is there a sign up list? If so where could it be please for some one how is interesting for the right reasons and where can I get a link
We pray 🙏🏻 🤞🏻 for sterile people who cannot have children. God gave us brains and knowledge.
This will not end well
If and when achieved, this will be one of the most important and beneficial technologies ever created.
Agree my friend I feel sorry for those who can't naturally conceive or have they're own child at all I've seen it break alot of hearts for life I hope and firmly believe this will be available within 5-10 years like Dr Sherman silber says or 20 none the less
I absolutly agree man, I want my own children.
*Totalitarian invention
What about over population ? Could that not become a bigger problem? If not than cool.
Overpopulation isn't a problem anymore since the human population is now growing very slowly and will start to fall around the middle of this century. People before though the population would just keep growing and growing but today people don't have that many children, if any.
It's estimated that we have a population peak of about 10-11 billion in about 80 years or so
Only rich people will be able to afford this so we'll be fine
@@jqd5 more affluent people or groups don’t want or have children as often as poor people
@@Ieatcum exactly, which is why when they do they'll want to pick the best part of their genetics.
I am afraid this will never be possible. It's too difficult procedure...😭😭😭😭
should hope more and more , do not be pepsimistic!
And this was before the current advances in AI.
Brave New World on the way. What a fascinating thing. Is a designer baby really immoral?
More importantly how would abortion activists react to this? The sanctity of birth would be gone.
It also means a person can be the genetic father and mother of a child.
But, still same dna 😂
@@456loveluck why did you use a comma?
I keep thinking about the Eugenics wars from Star Trek and the banning of Augments.
If IVG becomes a reality what would be the implications on Darwinian evolution? Also, this differs from IVF and sounds like it borders between CRISPR designer babies and not. This could help against the population collapse issue. But at the cost of creating a GATTACA scenario? Maybe this could be moderated...
We could barely moderated the food industry from poisoning us. What makes you think we could regulate this?
I don't see how this would impact "darwinian evolution" in any bad way. I mean we already "disabled" natural selection with modern civilization and these days even sexual selection isn't playing a role because of contraception
Another mechanical issue that comes immediately to mind is a uterus. This wouldn't be an issue for women obviously, but what about gay men? Is there any way around surrogates?
GATTACA the society that is bad for that one dude
@@jhunt5578 , did you pay attention to that movie AT ALL? Because the implication is that a LARGE segment of the society is treated exactly like that "one guy."
i reckon we have a part of einstein's brain stored somewhere, which means we could also "recreate" historical figure given we still have some cells stored.
i wonder if i lived too early to see this thing became reality.
Probably not, i bet ur lifespan will be long enough to experience all kinds of magiclike technology popping up; thats how its been for some time now and it doesnt seem to slow down :p
good comments from you. even we can make another person like Eistein,that is also good idea. as we have a twin of Eistein that is all. NATURE PROVE THAT TO US FOR MANY MILLIONS OF YEARS ALREADY. WHY ARE WE NOW AFAID OF THIS HAPPEN??? secondly, in ivf some embryoes can natuarlly double like in the womb of a woman then we can have another person like nature has done so far.
ACTUALLY SPERM CELL OR EGG CELL ARE ONLY CELL WHICH CARRY GENE INFORMATION FROM A PERSON. then Why should we not have other ways of cells to carry gene information to a new baby? if NATURE PERMIT THAT WHY SHOULD WE STOP ???
SIMPLE EXAMPLE: you can go to school or airport by your own car. then why not accept other means of transaportation such as bicyle, bus, train, ship,...to go to the airport right? i don't think this is A COMPLICATED THING TO ARGUE ABOUT ANY ASPECTS. only those who do not love people and have backward ideology then they will protest this !!!
Something my dad told me when I was a teenager "Any and ALL new technology CAN AND WILL be militarized FIRST". This will be no different. "Master Race" inbound in 3,2,1...
Yes I remember when they militarised IVF and made all or those soldier babies.
China is way ahead of us on this. Because Europeans did horrible things to each other in Europe 80 years ago, we at least have some cultural reservations about this master race nonsense. China doesn't because it never went through that.
Messing with something we don’t understand and creating life from it doesn’t seem like a responsible idea
How do u wanna understand a process if u cant study it thoroughly
Sry but how is this messing with something we don't know?! Scientists are trying and soon maybe in future achieve it. Also their are many couples and same sex couples too who are waiting and hoping to have their own biological child. What's wrong with it ?!?
You don't sound very intelligent. "Messing with something you don't understand." Do you mean scientific research? Every discovery we have today was because people messed with something yet understand. Doing the research and the science is HOW YOU UNDERSTAND. People said the same thing about IVF, now more than 4 million healthy and happy babies have been born with this method
This would be amazing
*horrible
Never going to be legal...
Yes it will.
all that would do is drive the market for this underground where things could only get more dangerous for those that choose to participate in the procedure. Its going to happen its just a matter of how its going to happen...
Just a fact: 9/10 researches that work om mice, don't work on humans.
and that's exactly how IVF started decades ago.
But this is such a generic thing.
If some proteins are different causing problems, that could probably be worked around.
do continue to experiment, i am willing to be volunteer for them to finish their project sucessfully.!
they will work on monkeys too.
Claims for the good of humanity and those struggling to reproduce.
Ends up bringing about the clone wars.
Make Huxley Fiction Again
Hahaha, a brave new world indeed
@@sidepunch i do see some similarities lmao
The question is.. is this good or bad?
I'm sure the military industrial complex would like to get their hands on this. Just think, an endless supply on military personnel.
Yeah, but I think it would be cheaper for the army to invest in a robot army rather than this.
@@angelloperez7273 agreed lmao
like cmon its easier to just make a giant explosive mini-drone army at this point lmao
your thinking is childish, 200,000 usd / baby. do you think they are stupid to do that, if the price go up like that? in the market you need one woman who carrry a baby at least you must pay 35,000 usd already , even if faild ivf you must prepare 50,000 usd. for the woman and a few cycle of ivf.
Clone Wars here we come!!!!!!
I argue right now adoption is the best and most moral option. But I think this can be the basis of how children are introduced into the world in the future. Which means a lot more control when to have a child and how many children are without parents. I think, sure, unconventional ways of reproduction sound eugenicsy. But I really don’t think this is actually a harmful approach. Innovating reproduction can be practical for life and future generations.
yes. if this happens it will be a revolution for women, they can choose the right one and right time they want to have baby without concerning the clock time.
sex is cheap way which nature gives but at many countries it only creates children generations who suffer from the abusing from parents, wars, poverty, they only create and do not think further future to children or responsibility to children.
In the future , we will have temporarily 2 kinds of children, I call : expensive children and cheap children. IVG create expensive children who have parents must overcome laws to do and pay more and more money to have children. and of course I believe these IVG children will have happy life and love from parents.
Sex is a cheap way to make children. Because it is cheap so many adults abuse them to have more and more children then let children work soon, no education and when they are older they ask their children to take care of them , many children in Bangladesh, in Indian ,in African have been abused like this already.
So In conclusion, if scientists can partly make healthy and good children from basic material of nature such as bone marrow or blood cells . I hope they are sooner and sooner successful and bring the achievements to the society.
how about bringing extinct animals to life
That is a pretty cool application of this technology, but you would probably have to find a viable genetic sample of the extinct specimen. Also extinct animals are extinct for a reason, but it would be super cool to bring back wooly mammoths and stuff. I think it would be more practical to bring back species that are extinct due to humans.
Just because you can, doesn't mean you should
I have lost 3 babies to a metabolic disorder, will this resolve that issue ? Like the baby not having genetic disorder or disease.
Scientists are working hard to give the best as possible as you expect.
At least from what I've seen with genetic research, assuming you can create an environment for an IVG Birth that you can control as well as apply Crispr to the fertilized egg as it develops you should theoretically be capable of eliminating the development of the metabolic disorder in the embryo. the problem is there are too many factors to immediate say what other problems could arise from early additional changes to an embryo's genetic make-up with Crispr but there is hope that this will allow for the ailment to be eliminated from a embryo in theory.
I hope this never happens. if you'd really like to be a parent and physically can't there's adoption if you just want to satisfy your vanity desire to make a child that looks like you then you don't know what being a parent means
I think the vast majority of people like having biological children because they share characteristics and personalities. I don't see anything wrong with that.
I want bio kids because the adoption industry is fucking terrible and I don't want to share my kid with a perfect stranger that could take them back any day, which is the only ethical way to adopt.
yes absolutely right!!! @@unenouille430
That's exactly what we need... more people. as if we are not already overpopulated.
We actually did a video on overpopulation, too. People have been predicting it for a long time, but their fears have proven false. That's not to say that there aren't big current issues with sustainability, but it's worth considering how this has played out historically. ruclips.net/video/iOaI5XRzuN8/видео.html
as ivf before, they can make many embryos then they also argue about overpopulation but so far it can helps some people. i want this really to happen soon. IT IS REALLY A BIOLOGICAL REVOLUTION which will bring more positive things than negative things. @@freethink
people who has problems of infertility does not make overpopulation. People who abuse sex to have more and more children make overpopulation and it becomes a big problem.
Sex is a cheap way so they make more children and let them live in poor conditions and when they grow up, ask them to have money and ask the children to take care of them when they are elderly people.
Do you think these children can receive love and good conditions from the parents to develop?
The IVG children are love by their parents, the parents must overcome some laws and pay more and more money before having a child from IVG. Therefore these children are loved more and certainly they are lived in better conditions to develop.
The more IVG children are born, the more children are really loved by their parents.
Dont forget the real issue for world is population booming uncontrollable in some region of world. It's people understanding that world can't sustain unlimited human, instead there's maximum number for human population to ideally exist so didn't exhaust earth. Its overpopulation the issue people need to solve first. And not to mention there's also issue of orphanages child. Africa, South America, asia, have some region that produce human more than the ideal capabilities of earth. That's the issue. Overpopulation in cities. That's the issue.
because sex is cheap to make children and many adults abuse this to make children then ask them to work soon or give no educaition to them, no taking care of them very well,.....
To IVG children, the parents must overcome the law as well as they have to spend more money then these children are loved by them , not abusing, even the child can live in a better environment.
Think differently you will have more positive views on this. this is a positive and better step in reproductive health. Please do not mention about overpopulation. it is problems of people who abuse sex in the world. it is not error from who has errors in reproductive health.
if there will be any trail of making baby from srem cell or skin cell , inform me will become the volenteor
should make baby form bone marrrow that is better and i am also volunteer for this too. or from blood,...
DNA just became inadmissable in court.
@Sharan If you can create an egg without a mother, cloning just became much more of a reality and manufacturing cells to leave at crime scenes and implicate the innocent a walk in the park by comparison.
@@ddoherty5956 If you used another person's sperm it wouldn't be clone, would it?
@@michaelstevens8073 if you can synthesise an egg from skin cells you think you cannot sperm?
@@ddoherty5956 The vast majority people wouldn't do that, plus I'm not certain it would be a clone. You would probably run the risk of inbreeding.
@@michaelstevens8073 It only takes one misuse to make the whole thing legally unsafe and to say the vast majority of people wouldn't do this is fair but, the vast majority of people would not put polonium in someone's tea or Novichock on a door handle, but some people have a big budget to take out their enemies.
is there somewhere u can donate to help fund/speed up research?
We are 10 years away? Is this serious????
Hopefully so my friend according to doctor Sherman sibler fertility specialist from MO,USA says were very close check out his channel on RUclips his moat recent updated info I did and hes giving me so much hope
He says in 50 years… 07:30
I cant wait for 10years ,why cant you do now?
because they are only 50% on the way. they can make follicles already but need to find out the way to develop them to become mature eggs which is necessary to ferlitize.
Not being able to have your own biological children is not a problem
hopefully this would arrive sooner than later, this would enable families to obliterate genetic diseases from their lineage with almos zero burden on the woman
Ain't gonna happen, there is no money in CURES, the money is in treatments
Love this welcome fredom
I am sure this will poorly affect our evolution.
Oh sure, but not McDonalds, sugary drinks or our unhealthy modern day diets that would caused harm to humanity and our evolution.
@@nntflow7058 *FURTHER, poorly affect our evolution
better?
Would we accidently select out important dormant traits? Would we narrow genetic diversity, turning humans into the genetic equivalent of a Dole banana?
@@NicholasDunbar If the ability to have children becomes irrelevant, and is not selected for explicitly with embryo selection, then traits for fertility would decay. Then traits for libido would decay, as it's just a risk without actual reward outside the brain. Then traits for genitals would decay as they no longer have purpose and pose a health risk. Then traits for sexual dimorphism would decay, as it no longer serves a purpose.
We would become asexual creatures, like the popular depiction of aliens we call "the grays".
people who give birth a lot in AFrica, Bangladesh, India,.... affect poorly the evolution already.
Sex is cheap so they make more children and children are NOT fed very well with healthy food, not enough good food or good medicine then more sickness affect them already on their genes and also on their body. :-) :-). So you do not need to have worry for evolution.
IVG children are checked carefully before they are born. their parents must overcome some laws and legal papers and pay more and more money to have them. Therefore these children are loved more by parents also the parents try to supply them a good evironment to develop.
So what is better for evolutions???? WHICH KIND OF CHILDREN ARE HAPPIER AND ACTUALLY LIVE IN THE LOVE FROM PARENTS?? :-) :-)) :-))
Well damn the first 51 seconds has me extremely pessimistic about the long term application. It sounds like genetically modified eggs…. Which sounds like crispr type technology and would result in creating the best egg for XYZ human means.
The possibilities for eugenics are endless. I love this.
Sounds like "Brave New World".
COMMUNITY, IDENTITY, STABILITY.
Yay Krypton here we come!
@𝗪hatsapp Me±¹⁴⁴²²²²⁷¹⁷⁰ why would I do that?
Just FYI, this is exactly how Wolverine works.
Ergh.. Why is it called Designer Baby?
Playing God
I don't understand how they can make an egg in the case that it's two men.. can someone please explain? thanks!
Two men are not required. The gamete is from a single person. It's basically cloning but with cells other than eggs or sperm.
@@Obscurai so, technically they’re not having kids together, just cloning themselves? This sounds like there will be mental health issues and stuff.
@@octoberboiy Correct. They are just cloning. As for mental issues, that comes with having children regardless of the method. The greater issue is generational genetic deterioration and lack of genetic diversity. Standard issues with cloning.
@@Obscurai yeah I would not want to raise a copy of myself, knowing for sure he would face all the same problems and health issues as me. I’d rather get an egg donor.
@@octoberboiy Don't they need a egg and sperm? I think they're just creating an egg from your DNA, not an embryo. If you used someone else's sperm it wouldn't be a clone.
Is this actually possible in 10 years?
i pray everyday for it.
Wait so we no longer need resume’s 🤔
*Another thing this video didn't say: Infertility is largely a myth.* Studies in India show when couples marry around age 20, the infertility rate is
Granted that all of this may be true.
But what can we do about it?
Tha answer: basically nothing.
Could you even imagine a successful social project to force women back into the home?
Women who want to have children will. There’s no issue.
@@katieakin9397 Dudes who want to have children will. There is no issue.
....think about it
This is absolutely pseudoscience. Crap comment.
@@SaintOrCinema OK, let's say I'm wrong, for argument's sake. Then what? Human females evolved to have children, as old ladies? 😅🤣😂OK, sure. Thanks for laugh.
Question: Can same sex couples only have children of their sex? E. G. Can two females only have a daughter? Cause you'd need a Y Chromosome for a son??
Why would a same sex couple need to have a biological child?
@@botowner8623 why not?
@@maramma4780 Why yes?
@@botowner8623 for the same reason a heterosexual couple would need to have a biological child
I don't think you can control that without added genetic editing with Crispr which could have other possible effects that we haven't quite charted yet.
Krisiloff really seems like he is not the right person to lead it. But he was a boyfriend of the investor
a boyfriend of investor is also a good signal in the project, right? :-).
So this IVG processs is start or not??
Not yet. Within 10 years it might start.
@supremereligion2817
Same thing to uterus transplant, for trans woman
Did he just said 50y
lol I don’t want to wait 50years
Awesome
Now I see umbrella academy
There are 50 million people in the US with IQs under 80, most live in poverty. Imagine if you could solve that.
Embryo selection is very promising indeed. Shifting the IQ curve up 15 points would transform society completely, at 30 points we would probably start colonizing new solar systems within 100 years.
Imagine mixing this video into this biblical story video here: ruclips.net/video/1hbCuKSEpJc/видео.html&ab_channel=TheLegendsofHistory made me thought that IVG is not part of God's plan as Ishmael. Muslims were descended by Ishmael and Hagar. Sarai was faithless since she can't conceive so she took Hagar to have a family through her but instead envy Hagar. God's promise to Sarai gave her Isaac. She had to kick out Hagar and Ishmael in the wilderness. You need to know that Jesus is a descendant by Isaac which lead to Christianity and its successful prosperity.
This bible story made me compare to IVG but... at least it really allows same-sex couples to have kids biologically right? Which means no more to put stress to become a victim of this not being part of "God's plan". Who wants to believe that IVG is in fact part of God's plan and his promise? Give me a yes for those who can't conceive!
What your saying is:
We become the Aliens.
I can wait to have gaybies🎉
Biological ones, not half
Fully biological
I am totally supportive of non-traditional families, and would put myself in that category. I conceived naturally in my 40s, and always said to myself if it never happened naturally, I wouldn't try IVF. Definitely adoption. I am still uncomfortable with human-created conception. I don't know why exactly why it makes me so uncomfortable, but watching this video even makes me anxious. It's such a fundamental natural process, that need not be meddled with. Am I being close-minded? Anyone else feel similarly?
I wonder if any of these scientists have considered if gay should be classified as a genetic abnormality, and if classified as such, should this be a trait we edit out? 🤔 Not saying this to be offensive, etc, it's an honest thought. If gay is seen as unnatural because that's not how we're designed to procreate, then should we be trying to limit the spread of the issue genetically?
Science has done some tremendous things for us as a species, but creating new humans in this way could have countless unforseen complications.
No because Homosexuality and Heterosexuality are just different ways sexuality as a whole express itself. It's like developing a type or a taste. So they are just different sides of the same coin, you can't remove homosexuality without removing sexuality as a whole. Homosexuality is not an abnormality, people simply started to supress it.
we don't know what the ripple effects are gonna be if we started ''editing out'' homosexuality. It might also accidentally remove traits that could be an advantage to society. Imagine a world where everybody is exclusively heterosexual 😅 We Need diversity and variety in our gene pool
@@rathan3288 fair point
Homosexuality is not a gene based feature there are some videos on youtube check them out