Make Money Selling AI Images From MidJourney
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- Here's a step-by-step breakdown of how I'm generating some (fairly) passive income by selling images made with MidJourney. Watch until the end for a tip that will save you a TON of time.
Note: Please make sure you read Adobe's terms of service because, with rapidly changing landscape of AI, they are likely to change quickly! There is now a checkbox for "generative art" that was not there when I made this video. They now require specifically disclosing AI art. This video was created before the terms were updated. Please read their updated terms here: helpx.adobe.co...
🛠️ Explore hundreds of AI Tools: FutureTools.io/
🐤 Follow me on Twitter: / mreflow
🐺 My personal blog: MattWolfe.com/
🌯 Buy me a burrito: ko-fi.com/matt...
🍭 My Backgrounds: www.futuretool...
Tools Mentioned:
- Adobe Stock: contributor.st...
- MidJourney: www.futuretool...
- Gigapixel Upscaler: www.futuretool...
- Free Upscaler: www.futuretool...
- Wirestock: futuretools.li...
Outro music generated by Mubert mubert.com/render
#AI #MidJourney #MakeMoneyOnline
![I Replaced ALL my ADOBE APPS with these [free or cheaper] Alternatives!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5EfqHg49kMk/mqdefault.jpg)
*Note:* Please make sure you read Adobe's terms of service because, with the rapidly changing landscape of AI, they are likely to change quickly! There is now a checkbox for "generative art" that was not there when I made this video. They now require specifically disclosing AI art. This video was created before the terms were updated. Please read their updated terms here: helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html
This comment should be pinned at the top
I did this, made and uploaded 89 images to Adobe stock... all 89 were approved (and I thought they were damn good). I got 5 sales in 7 weeks..... made $4.47. Feel like it was a huge waste of time.
I love how all these youtubers have one successful day and are immediately like "time to make a youtube video about it."
That's their job
That’s their job
That Free Upscaler's TOS says this: "You grant to us a royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive, sub-licensable and transferable license to use that Content including to reproduce, distribute, create derivative works, display, and perform it for any purpose in connection with the Service and our business, including for the purpose of promoting and redistributing part or all of the Service. This license is perpetual and authorizes us to make your Content available only for personal and non-commercial purposes, and only as permitted by the functionality of the Service."
Lots of great tips here, thank you. Be careful uploading these to different stock sites however, because their rules for AI are all different. Shutterstock and iStock both prohibit the sale of AI generated art currently, so if you are an existing contributor it's not worth risking your account. Also I noticed that Adobe's policy for AI states that contributors must clearly label their AI art as AI generated. This is from their website: 'AI-generated content is offered under the same licensing terms as other sources of content. Our policy asks our contributors to proactively label their generative AI content; we’ll soon add more features to make this content even more transparent.' Adobe provide an example of a stock image clearly labelled as AI generated art, which has the following title: 'Crystals and minerals. Healing, spirituality. Generative AI.'
In my opinion it makes no sense prohibiting AI art. If so then post processing with tools like Photoshop must be prohibited as well. AI is just another tool like Photoshop is. As Photoshop was new back then photos and art pictures weren't marked with a label "done by PS" as well. In my eyes this is paranoia from several plattforms.
Thank some youtubers think and mislead us, if we added its AI art no chance they will sell or be downloaded! so pointless video really glad i read this message before using watching this pointless video lol
@@WhereIsTheSpartan I agree that is where things are going. I don't think all sites are banning AI images because they are against it, but are just trying to cover themselves until the legal landscape is clearer. Shutterstock did accept AI images for a while, then got spooked because of intellectual property issues and stopped allowing contributors to submit them for now. I can see why, honestly, as many midjourney images reproduce watermarks and there are legal cases in the works that might be costly to the sites that are early adopters. Shutterstock has partnered with OpenAI, and many platforms are building AI image generators into their services and offering them directly to customers. It's very interesting watching the stages of the AI revolution unfold.
The terms of service were updated on their site after the creation and publication of this video. I've pinned a comment to the top, reminding people to read the most recent terms. helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html
@@WhereIsTheSpartan As always they do and will lock down avenues for people to create extra revenue and as such create loops for creators who generate content either images, text, video so as they are forced to pay a montly subscription to some saas platform or from generated revenue take a percentage of the generated revenue as yt has done in the recent past.
You also need a midjourney commercial license to sell the images generated there. Otherwise they fall under the Creative Commons Noncommercial 4.0 Attribution International License (the “Asset License”).
@@ANGEL_BOB_YT Same here in Australia - but we generally follow UK law so not surprising really :p
Thats only if you are generating images with a free plan. If you are a paid member you are free to sell it.
Fuck that. The AI learning process is about stealing others people's art, so why not steal their stealing
@@victorhugo3952 lol my friend steals other peoples art from mid journey after his free trial ended 😂
Use custom SD model not this shitty journey xD
Honestly this just shows how scared businesses like adobe Stock should be of AI images. I am sure in the next few years they will shift to generating their own images automatically just from the searches.
I think you are right
super refreshing! someone who has really tried something they are talking about and showing real results. not this make a million dollars a day using ai. Thank you for the video
I used so many AI tools. As a new graphic designer my most favourite one is BlueWillow. I created amazing images with BlueWillow and it's super cool and most importantly completely free
I tried a ton of the image upscalers and settled on the exact same ones as you, upscale media for free and gigapixel for paid. For the free one I got best results by doing 2x with enhance and then 2x without. Great tutorial TY
Newbie here, why not just vectorize an image with Adobe illustratior, if you have access to that?
@@silvermushroom-gamifyevery6430 Thats not how it works at all.
@@TehBananaBread IF image has clear edges and solid colors(eg vectorised well) vectorisation allows unlimited scaling. So he ha a point
@@extended_e no he dont, you loose too much detail and it's too much hand tweaking. Time consuming. Time = money
W tf are you paying for some shitty software that uses free open source models that are available for anyone on git xD
At the rate that you can generate stock photos through AI you might just be able to create your own stock photo site.
This AI revolution is amazing. So many new opportunities.
Could become a behemoth the size of Pinterest?
Thanks for the video. I noticed on Adobe terms it says everything has to be listed as Illustrations even midjourney 'Photos'.
"Identify any generative AI art as illustration, even if it looks like a photograph - only content primarily created using a camera can be submitted as photos. "
done. Got my first 3 images approved and listed on Adobe Stock. Thanks for the awesome video!
Some earnings?
@@shrv-pro prolly not from 3, u prolly need a couple hundred to start making some real money after some months
through midjourney?
@@siddplayzz1477 noone getting rich from this bs because why should someone pay for stuff they can get fo free
how did this go
Isn’t the whole point for us to get the images for free? Selling them makes no sense.
"The difference between art masterpiece and garbage is of a mistake".
~AK
Hello Matt, I've tried uploading some images and they got accepted, the problem is that stock won't accept my image with fake persons faces.. how do I fix it? I obviously can't do any documents for the person because it doesn't exist, I tried to contact Adobe but didn't find any way to contact a real adobe employee that would have helped me out
saw this video and immediately started. uploaded 8 within an hour. gonna generate more every day.
Why would anybody pay for anything now that everybody can create everything?
Courts have ruled that AI cannot hold copyright, which by corollary also means that AI-generated art sits in the public domain.
Correct - and this is also leading towards civil law suits - so I wouldn't be touching any of this with a ten-foot pole.
Can you link to the court case? Curious as to how this will work, and what can courts really do to people who are from other countries?
as long as you paid for the midjourney AI membership the licensing states that you own the rights to the images you "make"
@@Definesleep938 what about images generated through Stable Diffusion (which is open-source)
@@entopticmedia Do you have any links for this?
brilliant video... i've made over 22,000 MJ images and most are very 'strong' images of weirdness and i sold one print to the customer, for like £50,
images of juxtaposition of style, like an alien inside a pyramid, or a glass ghost etc etc etc...... this video opened up so many new possibilities,,, instaed of doing art to order. do mundane clip art and sell to 1000's without actually doing anything but typing..,....
how long did it take to generate over 22k MJ images??, are you using a bot or something because that's insane!
Currently, there is a Lawsuit with the popular AI art generators. Hopefully, this will clear some doubts and leave clear do’s and dont’s for all involved.
Thank you for this. I've been selling images I created with DAZ 3D on Adobe Stock, but I didn't know they allowed AI. I think some of the other stock photo places don't allow it yet, and I don't want to rock the boat with them. They'll likely change their policies down the road since this looks like the direction the future is travelling.
No they are deciding to ban it because it’s terrible quality
@@joseph-the-seventhupscale it using upscale softwares
Great video But people should NEVER upload Ai Art as it was taken out directly from the Ai generator tool. Instead, they Must edit it, correct and remove image imperfections, first, and after upload it. because Ai images are not perfect. They look perfect from Distance, but when you zoom out and bring them closer, there are really serious imperfections in the pictures, that are definitely needed some serious editing in Photoshop.
THIS VIDEO IS FREAKING AWESOME. I learned a lot. I'd like to give you a tip to return the favor. When uploading to Wirestock, skip Getty Images when it asks where you want to upload. Getty Images has announced that they will not accept AI images. Apparently they're too good for us peasants and our AI "art" 🤣 Thank you for this fantastic tutorial.
Good general info outside of stock photo selling
Has anybody noticed that this happy woman with money in hands in the video title frame, has 6 fingers on each hand?
This is bait. Entire economics around content and media creation are falling apart day-by-day. It's not fair or realistic to suggest that people can make money from this, when by the time they arrive, it will already be saturated and the price driven down to pennies. Not that I'm complaining; just help it to collapse quicker instead of suggesting to people that a dead paradym is useful for them.
Thank you. All one has to do is read TOS and comply and his video is still an AWESOME METHOD, now being an artist helps...not just the generative AI. One needs some sense of good composition, etc. So there's hope.
We all know the real way to make money, RUclips!
Just what we need, to saturate an already oversaturated stock sites with endless AI renders. Not to mention those renders are compiled using other creatives' work. Just lovely.
The maximum I'm able to generate is 1.5MB photos that are not allowed for Adobe Stock. How you make the photos to be more than 1.5MB?
The topic is burnt, now you have to wait over a month for approval... most of the illustrations are rejected. There are a lot of people who upload hundreds of pictures at once. January or February was a good month to try it. Now it's a waste of time.
What site do you mean?
@@auraidenl1019 Adobe Stock, only platform that accept Ai content.
@@hikaripictures1125 not the only one, i know 4
@@auraidenl1019Which 4 platforms you know? Please tell the names
but what you don't explain is "how do you divert the money from those sales to your account?" ...how to connect it with all that?..what credit cards do they support etc
They sending money via paypal or skrill/payoneer.
The fact others can have those images for free...why would they buy them tho?
I use a lot of the same prompts over and over again and have gotten vastly different results. So even if you have very different images, if they came from the same prompt, you can't make money off of them?
I should've known there'd be a catch.
The problem may be in near future is AI art being a commodity and very easy to generate. So, millions if not billions stock photos uploaded to stock sites and make it very hard to be discovered.
I came here looking for angry "artist" comments
Lol what? Here just bunch of people trying to make easy money
I’m a traditional artist and I’m loving AI generated Art right now.
Spend 2 weeks on One painting that needs to be digitised anyway, or tell AI to create 5 paintings in the style of me and have them sized and finessed in half hour tops. Love it.
They have all the rights to be angry. Ps. There are too many ignorant and insensitive people in this world and no technology will save them.
Why would I buy AI Art from someone while I can get it directly from Midjourney?
Do you think that everybody knows and will be interested to know and spent hours using Midjourney? It’s not that easy to create something outstanding.
@@sunnyGreece2022 I guess not everybody Will unless someone is looking to get something specific to their liking.
Cool beans, got the hookup with the AI income database. Good info. Stuff I have been working on. Now a lot easier. slow study, so I need the AI second brain to do. Now to hone it down to a 123 and start making some greens for the effort. Thanks guy. Will keep in touch.
You select the file type as Illustration ... but these are JPG images .... why ? if user download it and realize this is only a JPG than what ? Please clear this confusion ... waiting for your reply
not all of that sites accept AI content according to their policy
putting "textless" in the prompt might eliminate any odd text
Nah, man. My social media is already absolutely flooded with AI shite.
Thank you for the education sir. I've done this 2 months ago, and the results have not been felt. And the best-selling downloads on my Shutterstock, AdobeStock & Vecteezy accounts are tracing images 😄😄
@No Km what do you mean by tracing images? Driven by wheels or the images for children to follow the line around an animal for example? :)
Same here my top seller was line art than AI
@Luffy Tracing, in the sense that I sketch a picture in a notebook and then I make a vector in the design software
Stock photos will become worthless very soon if everyone keeps generating them with AI
Isn't that a good thing? Always a free image to go with your article
Imagine watching this video being the person who bought those images on Adobe Stock
If you use a tool that was trained on copyrighted pictures you are violating the ToS of Adobe Stock. Many people here completely misunderstand what it means when Adobe Stock approve a picture. Adobe Stock doesn't have any method to check on what pictures the AI driven tool was trained on. So they trust the uploader on this. But if later it turns out the AI tool you used was trained on copyrighted pictures (which is like 99% sure), you have to remove all your picture and give back all the money you received. You can actually sell only AI generated pictures if you train it only on pictures that you own the copyright or on pictures without copyright (and no, just because you are not aware that a picture has copyright on it doesn't mean it doesn't have. Similar to not knowing the law is not an excuse to ignore it).
How would they figure out which AI tool and model I used? I don’t think it’s possible. Especially if you use not MJ but local Stable Diffusion. You are so certain, do you know personally exactly precedents when Adobe removed photos because they didn’t approved AI tool you used? How did they prove and figure out on which photos the model was trained on … again I don’t think it’s possible to trace even if you use MJ. I think most uploaders are safe
Do you have a source for this? Because I heard of a law suite against Mid journey but it holds no weight.
It's false
All three images I created after watching your tut are now approved and live on Adobe :) Thank you
don't litter Adobe Sock I use it every day and I want to puke when I look at this generated shit
@@maciejolszynski7537 Please Puke! 🤮
How much time did they take to get approved?
It’s been 2 days for me, and yet no response
Don't mess the Adobe I use it every day and I see every day AI generate shit stuff. AI stuff is totally useless to create ad design. Now Adobe Stock is full of junky AI shit. Might Adobe inculde AI filters to remove AI from serches results.
@@maciejolszynski7537 Please do something useful in life other than criticizing others
Hello! Thanks for the tips, i'm based in the UK and i have an adobe account, opened it up on adobe stcok contributor and it looks different to your page and there are no headers with the option for insights? am i in the wrong place?
- "This looks good to me."
- * Hand has 7 fingers...
Hi Matt , Thanks for great video. I have 1 question. 23 Downloads - $47.78 is great money. But I watched other contributors' videos. They also share their dashboard. No one gain this money, Maximum $1 per download. How you did? Are you a US citizen? I think money is depend on your country.
The amount paid per image depends on the plan used by the user who made the download.
Good question. I am also very surprised by Matt's earnings. For me, Adobe Images pays $0.33 for each sold image.
For me, the amounts received per download have been between $0.30 and $1. Interestingly, the amount varies by day, too. For example, downloads that pay $1 on some days earn me $1.07 and $0.93 on others.
Quick question if anyone knows: How is the pricing determined on these illustrations? Do you set your own or does Adobe and the other ones which accept AI generated images decide?
adobe decides the pricing , youll get 30% percent
Do you have to wait until someone buys them from adobe to be paid or does adobe buy them?
@@gurutruecrimeguru1405 yes , we've to wait till someone buys them , once your account performs better your all unsold images will be bought by adobe for 5$ each and also those pictures will be permanently sold to them so you cant resell them .
Others will use midjourney like you and they won't buy product that they can themselves get it easily as you do.
@@abidlive8367 that depends on person to person no? If i fulfil someone's requirement why would that person will buy midjourney subscription
.
Is this the end of the stock image site monopoly ? I mean I am awaiting MidJourney to facilitate their own stock image site for MidJourney users to take advantage of, At least then the Customer is going to be fully aware their purchase is Ai generated. No wonder the likes of Adobe and Getty are losing their S4*t.
If you start with a generative art but do some post work on it in Photoshop or Illustrator, would that still require the AI art tag? Or could you opt for mixed media or whatever you wish...?
It would technically still require it. But who would know, you know?
Yes
Thanks for the detailed walkthrough, mate! I love creating AI Art so may as well try make some dollars with it. I'm sure overtime it will add up
Can we sale the images generated by Leonardo AI? because leonardo ai says we can use the images commercially created by them... @Matt Wolfe
I would be careful with wirestock because I also sell stock and know that almost all providers forbid ki and ai. Only Adobe is currently ready, I'm curious for how long. And you have to watch out for the money you earn because you gave up your rights to MidJourney's AI if I read that correctly. You can claim all the money you earn with the created pictures is in the rules or did I misunderstand? I hope the AI stays because I don't see it as competition but even then it promotes real nature pictures again in the future and the program is a lot of fun. Greetings, what do you say to that?
Midjourney is NOT going to claim any money you make for sales if you are submitting AI generated images to stock, or selling them on other platforms that allow it, as long as you are a paid subscriber. They explicitly say that you own the assets you (along with AI) generate. Yes, they do retain ultimate rights over the images for the reasons they cite, but that doesn't mean they are going to be selling your images or demanding that you cut them in if you sell the images you "create".
@@flickwtchr Ok thannks for your help :) i buy a abo and than i can work :) thanks good day
@@flickwtchr how about if i subscribe for 1 month and unsubscribe after they give us the right for that photos that i have create before ?
How are your stats now? How many elements have you uploaded by now?
It is highly important to understand that virtually ALL AI images are derived from other images, and most of them are copyrighted. Even if the watermarks are not present in any images that are rendered, keep in mind that with the new Adobe TOS, Adobe will reject at least 80% of generated images, particularly if they include anthropomorphic animals, styles like steampunk, anime, and even cartoon renditions. In any case, there is a very, very short window of time to profit on this if you get around the issues. Remember, Adobe has some extremely sophisticated proprietary copyright checking applications, which should prevent them from the major problems that AI generators have had with being sued by original content creators.
you clearly dont understand how copyright works.
@@TehBananaBread It's not what I MYSELF think, it's what the actual STOCK COMPANIES think. And THEY are trending to protect themselves from the massive lawsuits coming down the pike.
@@TehBananaBread you clearly don’t understand how AI works and is stealing work from artists without consent. This AI couldn’t exist without its stolen data. Therefore the use of it should not be for profit.
@@jasonedmunds You stole your parents time, energy, and life force without their consent. Sounds to me like you have some payment to make 🤔
@@excelsior8682 lol. They chose to have me.
well lets see what happens when everybody start to do this XD The value of the all images will go down
you will make cents for weeks of work. I've tried it and it's not worth it as the market is too saturated
How do you make specific aspect ratios for images in topaz? Was wondering how to make 4:5 or 1:1 aspect ratios
I always crop to the proper size using the process I showed in the video before upscaling.
Nice that you show some real results on how much you made, as opposed to other youtubers claiming that you can earn thousands of dollars easily. Would be nice to see some updated results in a few weeks though
I'll definitely update my progress in the future. It averages a few dollars per day but I'm also not adding new images constantly either. Maybe once a week or so, I'll toss more in there.
How much are you making with this now? Thanks
I love how the AI community comes up with this stuff. great vid!
well, looks like they are cracking down, submitted about 25 and they refused all of them with some cryptic massage that it violates the IP (intellectual property) of another :(
This is awesome, thank you Matt. Question - do you know how I could change my png file to jpg with a maximum size of 45MB and minimum resolution of 4mp. I appears when I try to load my art to Wirestock it tells me that they do not meet the requirements. However, I am using the same files that I loaded into Adobe stock successfully.
As the legal things are so confusing to a layman like me, I have understood that you can only sell images created by the lisenced/paid version of MidJourney. How about BlueWillow, which creates quite different style pictures? Any knowledge of that?
BlueWillow also has a paid plan. Same as Midjourney.
Thanks for another great video, detailed, transparent and informative ✌️ Keep posting pls
Thank you. A lot more on the way. :)
Super cool. Thanks for all the info! I’ll use all your affiliate links
hello! Thank you very much for the video, do you know of any cropping program for mac like the one you used for the borders that is this intuitive and fast? That the option to crop the image is as easy as the one you use. Greetings and thank you!
On a Mac you can open an image with the Preview app. Select the section you want to crop. Go up to "Tools" in the menu and select "Crop." It's built into all Macs. :)
I could not see the upscale button, do you need to be a pro package to have the upscale function.
Why would I pay for someone to have put some pictures online for sale? When I can create exactly the same images using AI.
I’m making $30K-$70K per week using AI.
That's not true and you know it.
I followed your advice, created an account with wirestock, uploaded 8 images i generated on playgroundai , and every single image was denied for sale on any marketplace, and on 1 image they wanted me to sign a property release of a young lady photo generated by ai. No luck there. Still waiting on approval from Adobe stock from the 1 image i uploaded of the very same young lady ai generated art I submitted on wirestock.... how do we succeed with selling items if they all get categorically denied? The images were good looking and non-offensive.
They should be denied ... I don't get why would you sell something that you didn't made and profit on someone else's work while.they don't get anything ...
@@HumanTouchArt he made them with AI and holds the legal copyright (if he paid for midjourney). The reasons why they were denied was likely because a lot of stock sites are refusing images made with AI and if they suspect it and have no proof they'll deny it anyway. I tried to upload 10 images to shutterstock and they all got denied. Most of them seem to be going through with adobe stock though, albeit slowly...
@@ANM21985 yes I'm saying that Ai art should not be montised ...this is literally as you went on Google and copied whole bunch of images and claimed you are the author of them thats where my problem is with Ai monotosiation 😅
@@ANM21985 Did your denied photos look real? Or were they just illustrations? There are stable diffusion models that enable you to generate life-like images.
@@HumanTouchArt That's not how it works. The images generated by the AI used by the guy in this video and Anthony are completely new. The people in them don't exist, the situations don't exist, the colors, etc. are all randomly combined. So, nothing was stolen.
Hi Matt, great vid. Can you please advise what wording in my prompt is needed to get and "overhead view, looking straight down view" of my image? I need different terrains viewed from the sky looking downward. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
birds eye view
I just saw some use "drone view", that might work as well
Thank you guys.
There's a saying in brazilian portuguese: "vergonha da profissão". You fit exactly on it.
Essa fala do Jacquin não é bem em PT-BR não kkkkkkkkkkk
No. You actually can't, and if you do, you're doing something illegal. Because I'm pretty sure the US leagal system has concluded that A.I generated imagery can't be copyrightet because there is no human copyright holder. (The same goes for the infamus monkey photo.) So i would not encourage this. Se corridor crews video on the legal problem with AI images for reference.
If you upload to multiple places through wirestock, how do you collect revenue? Do you have to go to each one? Or does wirestock also do that for you?
Google?
How to get money from iStock/ Adobe Stock or they send money to our account directly?
Super tutorial - as a digital creator it come very handy to be able to sell my work!
That's so not fair
..selling Ai art should be baned in general ...it's like taking someone else work without any consent and sell it ... Plus you didn't even put any skill into it ...I hope this kind of stuff gets regulated ...
When the digital camera came out many of the photo buffs said it should be banned. In my humble opinion i think this is just another piece of amazing technology to express ourselves. I actually edit, repair and transform most of my AI generated images.
@@tim-tron in your case, Ai is a process because you started from a generated image and made significant edits! I am also kind of fed up with the photography comparison and the triumph of technology, let’s just be honest with ourselves = accept it for what it really is or I must realize we became damn blind!
solid small additional side i/c, Matt!
This is so cool. Thank you, Matt! Hey, two questions. One, if I upload images to one or more of these sites, can I still use them too? Two, you said Adobe Stock was the only site to let you use AI Generative art, but then you used that wire-thing site to upload to Shutterstock, etc. Do all those sites know it's AI art and are okay with it? (Bonus question: Did you have to create an account on all those other sites first?) Thanks again!
1. Yes - You can still use the images that you generate for yourself
2. When you use Wirestock, they disclose that it's AI art in the description. It's up to the stock photo site to approve or deny it. Although, personally, I'm just going to stick to Adobe Stock for the most part (based on comments in this video's thread) just to avoid issues.
3. I didn't have to create accounts on all of those platforms. Wirestock uses their account and sells on your behalf (at least that's how I believe it works)
@@mreflow how to tell Wirestock to upload my photos to Adobe ? Where I should to configure it ?
Great video! How long does it take to review images? Mine have been in review for a week
If someone hasn't pointed it out to you @mreflow already, this is what you'll have to do to get the soldier(s) accepted bt Adobe:
"If the generative AI content was not based on a real person, but it visually appears to resemble a person, then you must submit a property release confirming that you have all property rights in the content. "
... except when people (such as myself), who are used to buying stock images (for work and for fun) get used to generating it on their own (such as myself), ...then who's left to purchase from stock agencies? A bit more insight ... total disclosure, I'm a marketing director and I have a hefty budget for art ... but since midjouney and Diffusion Bee ... I haven't spent on dime on any. Not one dime. Not one photo, not one graphic. Flyers, posters, video art ... nothing has been purchased. I also haven't hired an artist in MONTHS (we used to hire several each month). What we can't generate we photograph and then do an image to image in AI. Yes, stock photography has changed (thanks to AI) ... but maybe not in the way photographers or 'art' contributors would want.
Thanks for the video! Would you recommend Adobe Stock or Wirestock at this point, or both?
I'd just use Adobe Stock personally. There's too much of a grey area around the other platforms that Wirestock submits to.
@@mreflow Thanks for your response man! How's it going with Adobe Stock for you today, if I may ask?
Thank you so much for this substantial information.
Brilliant, Thanks. I will try this. Do Shutterstock also approve these?
Seems like Shutterstock doesn't like them because they have their own AI generator built-in now.
@@mreflow thanks for your response, I have uploaded 5 designs and will upload more in coming days
The many extra steps is the reason why you should get your local stable diffusion
Useful video. I have learned something new. Thank you for sharing.
Thanks for the tips, Matt! it helped a lot...congratulations for your channel and for the content! success!
this will not work for long
It looks like they already increased the cost for the tool at 13:20 - it now costs $100 more, so it's now $199
It's mostly useless for business until it start generating accurate anatomy, animals and other subjects/objects.
Its just amazing... You really helped me a lot!!. May God bless u!!!!
how is wirestock working so far?
how do i do the border thing im very new to all this
Subscribed! Very insightful.thanks.
Great video. Can you do an update on your progress with Wirestock?