What AI Image Generator Should YOU Be Using??
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 май 2024
- I broke down all the AI image tools and tested them against each other. Settle in. This one's a long one.
Discover More From Me:
🛠️ Explore hundreds of AI Tools: futuretools.io/
📰 Weekly Newsletter: www.futuretools.io/newsletter
😊 Discord Community: futuretools.io/discord
🐤 Follow me on Twitter: / mreflow
🧵 Follow me on Threads: www.threads.net/@mr.eflow
🐺 My personal blog: mattwolfe.com/
Resources From Today's Video:
MidJourney: midjourney.com
ChatGPT: ChatGPT.com
Bing Image Creator: www.bing.com/create
Leonardo: leonardo.ai/
Firefly: firefly.adobe.com/
Ideogram: ideogram.ai/
Outro music generated by Mubert mubert.com/render
Sponsorship/Media Inquiries: tally.so/r/nrBVlp
#AINews #AITools #GenerativeArt
Time Stamps:
0:00 Intro
0:53 The Grading System
1:26 Testing Accuracy
8:07 Accuracy Results
8:42 Testing Creativity
14:27 Creativity Results
14:38 Testing Realism
19:36 Realism Results
19:48 Testing Illustrations
23:03 Illustration Results
23:31 Testing Logos & Vectors
25:34 Logo & Vector Results
25:55 Testing Textures & Backgrounds
29:18 Textures & Backgrounds Results
29:30 Testing Text Inside Images
33:25 Text Results
33:44 Testing Censorship
38:02 Censorship Results
38:28 Comparing Usability
41:31 Comparing Pricing
43:19 Overall Final Results
45:43 Best Overall Results
47:01 Final Thoughts 
Наука
The new Leonardo Diffusion XL just came out yesterday (probably after you recorded this video). It is actually based on SDXL 0.9 model unlike the Dreamshaper V7 you used that is based on SD 1.5. Would have been great to see how an actual SDXL based model would have faired against the other image generators. Hoping to see a review of the new Leonardo SDXL model soon from your channel.
Keep up the good work. We appreciate what you do!
I thought a similar thing. SD and SDXL have so many models it's not a true representation of what it does. Especially Dreamshaper. It's really good, but is an old model. (I don't have anything against older models. RevAnimated is one of my favs) There are some crazy good ones out there, and they all have their own style. I prefer automatic1111 but Leo is good. Playground ai actually has more SDXL models than Leo
Love the videos, with some of the best content and resources out there!
What I do find interesting is I noticed that each application varies in terms of quality depending on the time of day. I cannot speak for every application but have noticed such for mid journey, and Leonardo . For example I have created over 1,000 images in both over the course of hours using the same prompt (not regenerate) and noticed as time progressed images would go from worse to really good. I decided to test such only after noticing that when I created great images from a specific prompt a day before and used them the next day they would render rubbish. Adding how the more coins and time spent the better the results would be. I am not sure if anyone one else had the same experience. Where certain time of day, length of time and so forth tend to result in higher quality images being produced.
But great video as I love the content you put out each week! Keep them coming!
27:25 with the prompt like [Create a seamlessly tileable texture ofa circuit, ensuring that there are no visible edges or seams when repeated.], Dall E-3 does it
The reason I love gpt dall E 3 is because it can create images difficult to describe, like if you get it to give you an entire lab report and then just ask it to generate a realistic image of the lab setup, it can do it
Yeah image generators really need to be combined with other smart ai that can comprehend what hands or eyes are meant to look like
Too censored to be useful.
@@The_Novu yep, major issue, also the decrease in accuracy and increase in errors
I think this is very underrated in this review. So far it seems the Dalle-3 ability to handle complex images is far superior to the others which seem to struggle with multiple subjects.
@@The_NovuThat's not true.
Absolutely love your content Matt. I love the advances in AI at the moment and know more than most people in my circle, when they ask if theres anywhere to keep in the loop, your channel is my go too recommendation for ease of information. Please keep crushing it!
Yet again, outstanding content from an outstanding author. I really appreciate the amount of work you must have put into this article and the net result was a goto chart I know I will want to return to, over and over. In fact, I will probably make my own version of your chart in a spreadsheet, and add the important column I think was missing -- Weight. Each one of criteria can assume a relative importance to the type of image normally produced by the creator, the look and feel of the image desired, the amount of money available for the project., etc. So I am going to add a column called "Weight" which will multiply the results in the colums by a weight of 1-10 -- and that will make your chart absolutely perfect!
The effort you put in for giving quality content is simply marvelous. 🔥👌👍🏽
Nice job! It's really interesting to see a direct comparison between the different models. One thing I may mention, though, in the video it looks like your image generation in Leonardo is set to Dreamshaper v7, which is a SD 1.5 model. SDXL should be able to do a slightly better job at text.
Great job as usual, Matt. Only thing that skewed it a bit is that the you were using SDXL 0.9 in Leonardo instead of SDXL1.0 from over at Clipdrop - the quality and accuracy jump from 0.9 to 1.0 was pretty major in my experience. Recently when illustrating a book for a client, 0.9 was pretty much unusable, whereas since 1.0 came out, it's become our go-to.
I appreciate this video, Matt. I'm already rewatching it for the second time. I use many illustrations of people doing their occupations for my work, and use Midjourney. Typically I am looking for a realistic black and white high-quality drawing. Others I do are historical color photos of Civil War soldiers and that type of thing. I have to take almost every illustration into Photoshop and fix the wonky faces, hands, etc. I appreciate the time Mj saves me over doing this work from scratch, but we still have a ways to go. Like you always say, it can only get better. I know you usually say "this is the worst it will ever be." 🙂 The one additional thing I would have liked to see in your video is prompting with an image. Often I have to use a reference image to get into the ballpark of what I want.
Nice comparison, but just a note is that alot of the negatives you gave for SDXL can be fixed by using specific lora's or ADetailer or different refined models etc.
@@elkabronzito Stable diffusion is the best one in my opinion, you can control every piece of it, using other images as references, I use Dalle-3 images from Bing and then edit them on Stable Diffusion. Stable Diffusion has a line art mode, I drew a bunch of shapes on a piece of paper and uploaded them, wrote a prompt, and it made an incredible image from the scribbles and shapes I made!
Matt this was truly excellent. Please make this a regular thing you do, upon major releases from the leading platforms. As someone who has generated over 20,000 images in MJ, and about a 1000 in DallE3, I can say you nailed it. I really enjoyed seeing how the models I don't regularly use, stacked up. Please do this again with MJ6 in December.
May I ask what you are planning to do with all these generated images? And do you keep everything you create or do you delete the imperfect ones as you go?
Hey. They sound like the figures I've generators.
I found a great 1. Freepik.
Its just really good at loads of stuff.
U get millions of stock fotos/videos
Sketch to generate
Re imagine (just churns out unlimited versions)
Enhance , creative upscaler
A hidden gem.
Great job Matt! We appreciate all the work that went into this video. My takeaway was a little different from yours (tiling images throws off sums as it’s a very specific use case, and - for me - accuracy would be much more heavily weighted). But looking at the same information and coming to a different conclusion is the mark of truly being informed!
Such an amazing video and explanation!!! Your effort and dedication is truly appreciated 🙌
I've been needing this kind of comparison. This is really appreciated, thank you so very, very much, Matt. Great vid as always. 🙌
Your review is nothing short of remarkable, complete, eclectic, and incredibly concise. 😊
Hey Matt, thanks for keeping us up to date :-) What you did not test and what's proven to be important for me is the ability to train your own models. Leonardo does that.
Dalle-3 is great unless you like horror images or any artist in the last 100 years anything even marginally risque that involve women or celebrities. Its way to censored hope they dial it back a bit otherwise people will bail really fast on it when the new Midjourney model comes out that incudes better accuracy and text.
I was so confused today after Image Creator wouldn't let me do a zombie.
100% truth man
@@wildstarr Dalle-3 cancelled Halloween
Minor secret. Avoid use proper direct nouns like he she her him male or female. Use less direct terminology. I believe it'll get you better Dall-e results. Turns it into an image dice roll.
Firefly wouldn't generate a glove for me yesterday because of "sensitive content" lol
Matt, what a fantastic overview of all these products which can be overwhelming deciding which one to use for what. Thanks for the clarity. Love the channel!!!
Great video. It would be really interesting if you could do this again in maybe 6 months time, to see what things look like then 🙂
Great video! I would have been interested in which ones are the best quality in terms of the size/resolution of images you can create. So many of these output very small/low resolution images that either require upscaling or are unusable for anything other than small web graphics. But, maybe that can be in the next one. Great work Matt! 😊
I've sometimes used Midjourney images in videos without upscaling when I was pressed for time. widescreen 16:9 images are around a thousand pixels wide, whereas DALLE will give you 275 px square useless crap. But its' still better to find a good uplscaler. OH-- Midjourney now has a 200% and a 400% upscaler BUILT IN but you have to spend fast hours to use it.
Wow... wish you would do that with other tool-categorys as well! Good job. I admit, in the beginning I didn t think that a comparison would be intrresting... but it makes it easier to "digest" the learning of your video (that usually before have been a little "hectic" nervous... because of the quantity of information in AI. Thanks for your work!
Great video! I would very my scores from yours ever so slightly, but over all I thought this was an awesome rubric review of all these tools. I enjoyed watching it, thank you.
As a data nerd, this checked ALL the boxes. Near the end I started adding all of them up, assuming you wouldnt and then you did and I just felt so complete. Like that final "ahhhh" perfect! Excellent video and welp worth the effort. I would absolutely LOVE to see a similar comparison for other categories on text based, math, programming etc. PLEASE MATT
Matt, this is the most comprehensive and informative video I've seen on this subject. Thank you for all you do! Keep up the most excellent work! 💜
Wow Matt, the work you put into these videos is incredible. Thank you for all the effort and brilliant content. This video particularly was so helpful to me (and others I'm sure). I managed to get a print-out of your final comparison chart. It's so helpful to have it all in one place like that. Perfect. Thanks again
Thank you for always making these incredibly informative videos. I always look to you for where to put my time and energy and you’ve made this crazy AI journey feel less overwhelming with each video. 🙏🏼☯️🌞
Excellent work! And thank you for all of your time you put into it. For vector I would def suggest to use another model than dreamshaper 7.0. But glad to see it still outscored all others. I use both MidJourney and Leonardo and wanted to see this video to see the difference with everything else available
I mean with SD the same seed and prompt will always be similar, that is actually one remain it is great with making characters in a similar scene and other uses. Also, you need to add more to your prompt for realism like “photo” in most image generators or some will randomly generate more illustrative images.
Thank God for this timely post, I had begun working on this very project this morning - you have better criteria and saved me a ton of work - may you be blessed for this good deed
This was a great breakdown, I literally just starting learning about image AI and I really needed to see some comparisons so I knew which one to try. Thanks!
Stable diffusion by a long shot.
It takes extra work, sometimes lots of extra work, but it's the only one that's capable of producing exactly what you are imagining consistently.
it definitely is not, i'm not sure how long you've been using stable diffusion but i bet you'll find out that its actually very limited.
@@o1f444 dude. That was like a whole month ago.
I still stand by it if you're using ComfyUI, but that could change later today.
Love it - pretty detailed comparison- thanks for doing it Matt. I’m a fan of your weekly contents
If Midjourney can create their own LLM and integrate it with its Image creator, Dalle3 won't stand a chance. Censorship will kill Dalle3, but I don't think OpenAI cares. Dalle3 is free (Bing version), so there's no incentive to change anything about it because the ChatGPT audience and the AI Art audience are different.
Yes, thank you for saying that. I haven't been able to generate usable images with DALL E between it's censorship and weird color scheme. The images it makes are too tiny, they look fugly when enhanced IMHO
The censorship makes it almost unusable for real
Like it's blocked probably half the images I tried to create. It even didn't like "graffiti" like wtf
My coin is that rather than waiting Dalle to be less sencored, expect that MJ will be more censored. They ban new words on daily basis and when the web version launches they might set new moderation rules. It's not about LLM. Dalle understands prompts better as the dataset was properly captioned. There is a white paper explaining it on Open Ai site. MJ would need to re-train their models from ground up with same level of image captioning to get as good with prompts as dalle is.
Thanks for all the hard work. Some of these I've never used. Bing Image Creator with Dalle-3 is my go to.
Thanks so much, Matt! That was such a well done and thorough survey of all those apps. I've been taking a course that's been covering several of them, but I've been overwhelmed and figured it would make more sense to focus on just one or two of them. You've helped me determine that Midjourney and Leonardo will probably be the primary ones I use, as well as a little Firefly here and there, as well as some Google and maybe even Ideogram (which I hadn't even heard of until you brought it up).
Super show, as always, Matt! I am glad I invested in Leonardo. Now I need to go get some value out of it!
Very helpful and thank you for the wonderful work you do. (Voice gets a bit squeaky, but I guess that’s part of your brand). I appreciate you.!
Thank you so much for putting the time and effort into this video. This has helped me so much and saved me a lot of time 10/10
Wow, that's a great comparison. Very interesting! Thank you for making this video.
As a daily Leonardo ai user I have to mention that it can do much more. The model DreamShaper v7 was used in the video but there are many more amazing models to use on Leonardo ai. The most powerful ones right now are: Leonardo Diffusion XL, Leonardo Vision XL, AlbedoBase XL and PhotoReal. They create amazing results.
awesome Matt..this means a lot on my productivity..for sure, this takes a lot of time to do..
Great job Matt. Thanks for all your hard work in putting something like this together. Problem is it never stays up to date for very long.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:00 📸 AI Image Generators Overview
- Introduction to various AI image generators and the need to choose the best one for specific use cases.
01:08 🔍 Accuracy Assessment
- Testing accuracy by providing prompts and evaluating how well each AI image generator adheres to them.
04:09 🎨 Creativity Evaluation
- Assessing the creativity of AI image generators by giving them minimal context and examining the resulting images.
08:37 🌟 Realism Analysis
- Analyzing the realism of AI-generated images using a specific prompt and evaluating how convincingly they depict the scenario.
18:50 🎨 AI Image Realism Test
- Mid Journey raw, Firefly 2, and Mid Journey without raw scored the highest in realism.
- Google and idiogram performed poorly in creating realistic images.
19:59 🖌️ AI Image Illustrations Test
- Mid Journey in nii mode excelled in creating colorful and contrasty illustrations.
- Style raw mode wasn't suitable for illustrations.
- Dolly 3, Bing Image Creator, Leonardo, and Firefly 2 produced decent illustrations, but lacked the contrast of Mid Journey.
26:13 🏞️ AI Image Tiling Test
- Mid Journey, both regular and raw, successfully created tileable images.
- Dolly 3, Bing Image Creator, Leonardo, Firefly 2, Google, and idiogram struggled to create seamless tileable images.
29:42 📝 AI Text in Image Test
- Mid Journey and Mid Journey raw failed to generate accurate text in images.
- Dolly 3 produced some images with text, but with typos.
- Bing Image Creator also generated text, but with typos.
- Leonardo and Firefly 2 didn't perform well in generating text.
- Google and idiogram successfully added text to images, but Google struggled with multiple words.
33:53 🚫 AI Censorship Test
- Mid Journey and Mid Journey raw had minimal censorship, allowing celebrity and IP-related content.
- Dolly 3 restricted some content based on policies.
- Bing Image Creator had increased censorship, blocking certain prompts.
- Leonardo showed no censorship and allowed various content.
- Firefly 2 had significant censorship, blocking both Tom Hanks and SpongeBob with Super Mario.
- Google had censorship issues, blocking Tom Hanks and Super Mario-related prompts.
- Idiogram had some censorship but allowed certain content.
37:07 🖼️ Image Generation and Censorship
- Dolly, Firefly, and Leonardo can generate various images effectively.
- Idiogram appears uncensored but lacks in image quality.
- Mid Journey and Google have usability and censorship issues.
38:32 🤖 Usability Evaluation
- Mid Journey's Discord interface can be overwhelming.
- Dolly 3 in Chat GPT offers a familiar chat interface.
- Leonardo provides versatility with a user-friendly interface.
42:17 💰 Pricing Comparison
- Mid Journey offers a $10 monthly plan with limitations.
- Dolly 3 in Chat GPT is the most expensive at $20 per month.
- Leonardo has a free plan and a $10 per month plan, providing good value.
- Firefly offers a free plan and a paid plan at $5 per month.
- Google's image generator is free to use.
- Idiogram is currently entirely free.
45:45 🏆 Conclusion and Recommendations
- Leonardo is recommended as the best value with a score of 75.5.
- Mid Journey and Idiogram offer different strengths and drawbacks.
- Dolly 3 in Chat GPT is less recommended due to high cost and censorship.
- Dolly 3 in Bing's Image Creator is an accurate, free alternative.
Made with HARPA AI
Thanks for a great video! Very informative and thorough. Do any of these allow you to upload your own images to play with?
Thank you for all your hard work. As a MidJourney subscriber, I've been wondering if I should stick with it or look at something else and this has been really helpful. Accuracy in MidJourney has certainly been a bugbear with it sometimes taking six or seven prompts to get what you want, and you addressed that perfectly.
Well done Matt! Great quality video!
Matt -- this has been soo helpful. Ping-ponging back & forth btw the various image generators can be frustrating, but having a road map like the one you just created can hopefully take a bit of the struggle out of it.
Leonardo AI added a new refiner called Alchemy Refiner, which goes back to correct any malformed limbs and hands. And I love it's Canvas feature which allows you to go back and fix spot work defects. Or add images to images and linking them together
Thanks for video. I think it was a good work from your side. Like the bing chat image creator myself at the moment. I would also like to see what offline AI or offline creators at the moment is the best. Thinking more on the privacy and if information when using an AI is not supposed to go online.
Super Video!
I am using a lot of AI generators because of all these different possibillities. But most of the time I spend on Local Stable Diffusion, not only because I love the Open Source movement very much: I like the idea that creative people all over the world are working on improving SD...
BTW: With the new SDXL tiling you can also choose between horizontal or vertical tiling.
Happy colored Greetinx
Excellent video, as always, thank you. Just a note to color spaces: RGB is the color space used for digital displays, similar to how CMYK is used for printing. Given that all non vector images generated by AI are until now inherently in RGB mode, the term "RGB image" in a prompt may not convey specific color requirements or color choices to an AI image generator and should not be seen as a flaw in the output.
Thanks so much for taking the time to make this video ! Very informative 🙏
Hands down, the best comparison of AI image generation as of October 2023!
Thank you for taking the time to make this video and share it with all of us.
I am of course subscribed with notifications enabled and thumbs up!
I never thought someone would go above and beyond like this. Thanks a ton! 👍
Fantastic vid - the best comparative AI vid I've seen. Luv the table format. It'd be great to see an updated version a couple of times per year, maybe using the old table and just update the figures for changes due to upgrades. Just an Idea.
Given a highly descriptive prompt (that you can have GPT4 generate for you) you can produce some really great results with DALL-E 3 I found, which well surpassed SDXL. It really doesn't belong at the bottom of the pile, especially if you stick to what it is good at.
It would be too much to expect Matt to refine each prompt to get the best results for each system, but I agree that with GPT 4 the process is not about your first prompt but how you get GPT to improve the prompt over subsequent generations.
@@vodkaman1970Yes, and it was super beneficial to see the same prompt for comparison.
Do you guys know the best ai picture generator for explicit content, celebrities etc ?
@@rodrigoorozco9263 If you've got a beefy enough machine you can set up stable diffusion on your own private server, and it can be completely uncensored or filtered. I haven't tried but there are a few videos explaining how to do it and it doesn't look too difficult.
Hey Matt, one mistake you made: you gave Dall E a 3 and a 6 for something you gave Google a 7,5. Both censored Tom Hanks but created images of the Storm trooper, Mario and Spnge Bob. You should've rated them equally.
I think also rated MJ the same as Google, when MJ did both characters. Oh well, i guess it was a marathon for him so a few logically errors crept in.
Hi Matt, this is one of your great video, Highly admire and appreciate your effort. I would request to make 2 more parts of this, because different platforms gives different results according to their prompt dependancy, like keywords or negative prompts. You may also share more other comparison tools like bot avatars or whatever you like best. Thanks
Thanks for the feedback. I actually wanted to compare a lot more but didn't want to make a 2-hour video. I'll likely do a followup though. :)
I appreciate the effort you went through to give an overview on this. I disagree with some things (There are other SDXL alternatives to Leonardo that are free and work great), but the overview of what the different services are capable is pretty useful. Kudos!
Fantastic comparison vídeo! I laughed a lot seeing the images and learned a lot about the tools and the IA images generators in general. I'll give a 10 out of 10 :D
Try this prompt: Create an image of a penguin holding a wooden sign that says "Subscribe" "to" "Matt" "Wolfe"
This should do the job.
Great video. I really appreciate all the effort and work you put into making this. And it was super helpful for those looking into AI image generators. 👍
I look forward to having people review Novelai when they roll out their image generator update. They are making an image generator from the ground up - right now it's a fork of SD that's specialized for anime and takes prompts differently because it's trained off of danbooru - it has a free tier, credits you can buy, and multiple paid tiers, and it's fully uncensored. If the bot understands what you want it to generate it will do it.
Excellent video. Thanks for putting in all the work Matt!
Great job! The best of DALLE inside GPT is because it’s ALREADY inside of what I consider paying now is a great choice (meaning what gpt 4 provides)
That was a great video, I found the information to be exactly what I have been looking for, I would like to see how capable they are on different operating systems, iOS, Mac, windows, Linux overall a great video thanks for all the hard work
Great work! Thank you for this effort.
Once Musavir is out of Beta you will be amazed!! I was asked to beta test it and it is mind blowing 4K output and humans so real. Btw you should use -s 500 with style raw in Midjourney
Fantastic video comparisons!
Thanks. You are amazing, Sir! Very decent summary. Lots of ground covered. Loved it
SUPERB ......THANKS FOR YOUR EFFORT ....ALWAYS LOVE YOUR VIDEOS!!
Best RUclips channel right now! Great stuff!
Thanks Matt for this effort to make a comparison between AI platforms 🙏🙏🙏
Leonardo just came out with Alchemy v2 and the new Refiner a few days ago.....these are amazing and vastly improves the image generations!!
Great video. I needed this. Just like with life you can see the bias in ai through the beauty prompt. Overall this was so helpful.
You can actually get excellent illustration style raw from midjourney if you promp for cartoon style, anime,anime cartoon etc.
Fantastic review, Matt! Appreciate the deep dive.
Amazing work. Thx a lot. For next time, you can maybe consider adding a "Speed" category to compare the time needed to generate a lot of images, since for us AI creator, a tool that generates 1 image every 30 sec is pretty useless.
Great idea! Thanks for the feedback. :)
SOLUTION: Matt, I love your channel. I find it very informative. I got the Text inside images with Google to work. Enclose the phrase inside curly brackets!
This table was great. I personally give a lot more weight to accuracy than anything else, as I don't really care how beautiful and in detail the image is, if it is not what I am asking for... Therefore, I don't agree with the overall scores, but it is great to have all of them organised by their strengths and weakneses.
Awesome job!
Excellent analysis; thorough and well edited
... around 23:39, you could not have been more on point with logos of wolf, my profile pictures are the same but with a fox, i usually don't leave comments on videos but this part was kinda specific for what I have been doing and this was a great prompt and/or tip for me, I am happy I subscribed to you and watch your videos (I know your name is Matt Wolfe, that probably had some factors into the prompt)
Lastly, keep up the great work Matt, very interesting video.
I commented on another video looking for advice that I’m probably more likely to find in this one but… I’m using the GLAM app for iPhone and it’s inspiring me to look into more “pro-level” options.
Thank you, so much work you put in it! It’s so helpful!
Wow, exhaustive and exhausting. Great job!
Dude! I love your videos. I especially appreciate this kind of video. It helps me out a lot. But why didn't you include runway ML?
I found the 3 headed monster test to be GENIUS. It really helped to show the differences. Subscribed!
Thanks so much Matt...this is great. Is the spreadsheet available to download anywhere? Also since anything is possible now,,,can you drive a prompt through all the AI Tools simultaneously while also having them be graded by an AI Image Tool Super Bot? See humans never satisfied...
Something I like about MidJourney is it keeps your images on a server. How about the others?
Discord is discontinuing this feature soon. They'll be expiring images after a while. All of the others store your image in the cloud, at least for some time.
We found Midjourney's last subscriber!
Very thorough! Subscribed!
Such great information Matt! Thank you for validating my personal preference for Leonardo! I love it.
With DALL-E (2024/2) it is important to start a new chat any time you begin a new image concept, otherwise the context window will come to bear on the image produced.
Also, DALL-E is using an LLM expert to take the raw prompt into the actual prompt that is sent to the model for inference/diffusion. If you call the Open A.I. API via a script, the JSON response includes the actual prompt sent for inference. See hugging face spaces for various "prompt generators" which provide similar functionality for the various A.I. systems including midjourney & stable diffusion.
I find Dall-E 3 via Bing to be consistently better at realistic images than its Chat-GPT counterpart. I hope that changes soon.
ChaGpt is very good. I added some custom instructions and the images are just next level
@@universe6735 I'm speaking specifically of photorealism, especially for faces. In my observation Bing (at the moment) is far better in that arena.
If you look at the actual prompt that GPT uses, it changes words, puts in synonyms and uses flowery language like "captivating the feeling of loneliness" which I think at best is wasted on DALL-E 3 as it knows shapes, color and textures, not emotions. You can tell GPT how it should prompt or even insist that it takes your prompt exactly word for word. I highly recommend Glibatree's RUclips video on custom instructions for DALL-E 3 and you'll get much better images in no time
@@universe6735 Yes, I found DALL-E 3 quite underwhelming to start with, but when you understand how it creates the prompts from what you're asking and then you guide to make better prompts, the results are on an entirely different level
@@vodkaman1970 I feel like I've tried everything. I've even asked GPT to behave like Bing.😁😁😁 Of course, I'm aware of the descriptive language that GPT adds to original prompts. However, when I copy those same augmented prompts from GPT and use them in Bing, the faces in Bing are still noticeably more realistic. When I use the approach of instructing GPT to activate my prompts exactly as I have written them, Bing continues to yield less impressive results than GPT for photorealism of human skin.
Surprised to see Stable Diffusion leading the pack, especially when many seem to lean towards it for its lack of content restrictions. I've always been a fan of it due to its cost-effectiveness with a good GPU. However, with the community's diverse opinions on various AI tools, it's clear that there's more to these tools than meets the eye. The discussions around censorship, usability, and tool capabilities are particularly intriguing. It's a dynamic space, and I'm eager to see how these platforms evolve in response to user feedback and technological advancements. Cheers to the ever-evolving AI-ionosphere! 🚀
Great content Matt 🔥🔥🔥 🚀
Great video Matt, very lengthy indeed, but well informative
Great content. I probably would score differently, but you did say it was subjective.
One category missing, which to me is huge, is licensing. I love Bing's output but cannot use it commercially. Probably most people watching this are using AI for POD, etc.
Thanks for the great content.
The only one that I supremely disagreed with on the ratings was the price for Leonardo. Other ones that were only free were given a 10 and Leonardo does have a free version but also a paid version and it was given 7.5. Riddle me that one.
Thanks so much for the warning about licensing. I was going to mess around with Bing but not if that means I can never use the image for anything commercial.
48 minutes!?! It was bound to happen. GREAT breakdowns! 😎
VERY in-depth video and great to see them side by side. Our personal opinion is like most things there is no perfect answer - so use things to their strengths.
However as things are progressing very quickly in the world of AI, it be interesting to see a similar video from you in say March 2024 and see how its all progressed.
Thanks for these, love your blog too!!
Amazing! Just what I was looking for. Keep up the good work!