Google Ventures workshop: Lean analytics

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 фев 2014
  • Google Ventures | The Lean Startup is all about a constant cycle of learning. By measuring and analyzing as you grow, you can validate whether a problem is real, find the right customers, decide what to build, and how to monetize it. In this workshop, Alistair Croll talks about finding the One Metric That Matters to your startup right now.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 28

  • @johnchan8918
    @johnchan8918 10 лет назад +3

    Really like this guys presentation style. Awesome talk!

  • @singab
    @singab 8 лет назад +22

    This is one of the most informative and useful workshops I've listened to in a very long time.
    Is there a place i can download the presentation itself?
    Thank you.

  • @mauriciocostarica
    @mauriciocostarica 10 лет назад +1

    This is a great video -- thank you for posting it.

  • @DerekBraid
    @DerekBraid 8 лет назад

    Really good watch. Worth your time if you're interested in measuring web traffic, startup progression and/or care about modern (digital) business analytics.

  • @assdforst5891
    @assdforst5891 8 лет назад

    impressive lectures
    Dr. Siddig Ahamed Mohamed

  • @jan-willemverstraten8497
    @jan-willemverstraten8497 9 лет назад

    Great presentation. Very insightful and easy to follow!

  • @marshiebo
    @marshiebo 9 лет назад

    This was insightful

  • @pickensrj
    @pickensrj 10 лет назад +1

    Thanks for the insightful presentation! Does anyone have other great videos on lean analytics you could recommend??

  • @andy17234
    @andy17234 8 лет назад +2

    I didn't realise The Fat Duck was popular over the atlantic?

  • @JFCotman
    @JFCotman 9 лет назад +1

    what is a cohort?

  • @ciscoinc
    @ciscoinc 9 лет назад +2

    Subtitles please

  • @einfachBoris
    @einfachBoris 5 лет назад

    Anybody knows the Name of the book he recommend at around min 31:00?

  • @victorxu9634
    @victorxu9634 4 года назад

    lmao this guy is funny. why is the audience so cold.....

  • @tensevo
    @tensevo 6 лет назад +3

    You get the feeling this guy thinks everyone is dumb????

  • @tensevo
    @tensevo 6 лет назад

    When he says patronizingly, "this is what we call science" -- well, that was not science. Science requires accurate repeatable prediction of hypothesis to form laws or theories, not simply measurement of various arbitrary tests. I think this is what we call pseudo-science.

  • @sheilaborges4404
    @sheilaborges4404 5 лет назад

    Someone please give this man some sedatives. He might not have considered the audience experience. I guess.

  • @TheRiseAndFall
    @TheRiseAndFall 9 лет назад +6

    That statistical boy/girl problem has to be bullshit. I can't explain why. But it has to be wrong.
    What about this: I have 8 kids and they are all boys. My wife is pregnant right now. What are the chances that the baby will be a girl?
    By his reasoning I suppose the answer is 1 over 8 factorial or something like that (forgive me, I haven't done this in a while). This cannot possible be right. Is it not still 50/50 that it will be a boy or a girl? I swear this is the same as the coin flipping problem. If you flip a coin 9 times and it was heads every time, then what are the chances it will be heads on the tenth flip? 50%.
    Am I crazy?

    • @whwong1628
      @whwong1628 9 лет назад +8

      He presented a different problem to what you understood it to be.
      His question was if he had two children and at least one of them was a girl, what is the probability that the other child is a boy.
      Combinations of two children: BB, BG, GB, GG.
      Given that at least one is a girl, BB is excluded.
      Clearly, two of the remaining three have a boy giving 2/3 the other child is a boy.

    • @sgtsnakeeyes11
      @sgtsnakeeyes11 8 лет назад +2

      +Luke Hansen I'm genuinely baffled by it. I think he's using a sort of trick of language that involving permutations. Isn't the GB/BG distinction, although a possible combination, irrelevant in terms of chances? If one is a girl, it seems the other one simply has to be a boy or a girl.

    • @shogunfogun
      @shogunfogun 7 лет назад +4

      BG,GB - they both are the same option. We are not talking about if the B or the G came first, but they are just there. So the options are BG or GG, and therefore the chances are still 50%. But you are right..there is a little bit of word-wrangling going on, and it's all what you hear.

    • @SikkiSweets
      @SikkiSweets 6 лет назад

      You are absolutely right statistically

    • @ianman6
      @ianman6 6 лет назад +3

      You're right, it's bullshit. He misunderstands probability. The sex of each individual child is irrelevant to the sex of another child. They are probabilistically independent and so must be evaluated individually, not as a probability of each event occurring together.

  •  10 лет назад +2

    Croll is a little bit abnoxious trying to be smart all the time. he could have said the thing in 10 min.