This is so true for 99% of garbage people upload on youtube. People intentionally being jerks to try and trigger an altercation so they can be the center of attention
The whole concept of "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" seems to be getting forgotten. These are the sort of people who would book a family holiday to somalia, just because they could.
@RaXa I wouldn't be sure about that when they are the only ones who have free speech. Europe only has freedom of expression, which is not the same thing. Gets even worse with asia and socialist countries
He is not a 1st amendment auditor. He is a fraud, and a terrible one at that. He and people like him are the reason people call 1st amendment auditors sovereign citizens. And the fact that most people don't know the difference between the two doesn't help either. But then that's what happens when you completely fail understand the context of what you're seeing and/or hearing.
@@snakehunter8215 he was expecting her to say no to his random request, then he'd say no to her request of stopping lawful filming of the pubic. Got caught off guard by her saying to take the car granting his request and obligating him to grant hers in return so he just improv'd some random shit by saying to let the other guy take her car.
That first guy is essentially taking the "I'm not touching you!" game to the extreme. "I'm legally allowed to film you! I'm legally allowed to film you!"
Nah they both sucked and arguing isn't harassing. Why he should just let every person have his/her way? I wouldn't either, that said, I wouldn't record everywhere I can, just because I can. It's douchy.
@@solinus83 She just asked though. If she didn’t want to be recorded, that’s reasonable since nobody wants to be recorded unless you have their permission.
@@fourearwolf3315 wrong, you dont need anybody permission to do what is allowed, and this is allowed by constitution, that means public entities, cannot make a policy in violation with constitution, like for example forbid taking pictures in publicly accessible areas.
The first video the guy is being super rude. I feel for the woman, she actually seems like she's probably nice when she isn't being harassed by some random guy.
1st Amendment Audits are entirely necessary to protect the civil rights of every U.S citizen. The post office is a public area, so the 1st Amendment applies there, including the added rights that Poster 7 gives to anyone who comes into a post office to record. Imagine if we lived in a police state, they could beat you, kill you, and nothing would happen to people in authority positions because none of it was caught on camera. Who do you think the courts will believe? A common citizen, or a police officer? Remember, you could be the next one to get singled out and targeted. Fight for your rights.
@@HawkeGaming I'm not doing this to be antagonistic, I just want people to think about it, you could be the next falsely convicted person to fill an arrest quota. Just food for thought: Liberty dies when we trade it for safety.
If someone asks to stop being recorded (and they aren’t causing any issues and are minding their own business) they should have the right to NOT be recorded… legally they can’t do a thing in public. I just think people should be shown basic decency and respect 😩
She is a Karen. I think the main thing with Karens is that you can be bothered by anything and that's ok but when you think you deserve to have what you want always (in this case to have him stop recording her) and you start acting entitled to get what you want, you are a Karen.
@@iamhereblossom1588 by law, in public you do not have the right to privacy. Which means if someone wants to record you they can (except when it reaches the point of being harassment). I like these guys because the way current day society is, is just plain delusional.
@@iamhereblossom1588 generally speaking recording someone in a building isn’t legal unless the owner of the building says it’s ok. In this instance the building is public so it’s perfectly legal, but she clearly didn’t know that. And she was ok with him filming as long as he wasn’t filming her. Once the postmaster informed her that it was legal she dropped it, which is good. She didn’t feel entitled to anything but her privacy, which she felt she was legally in the right to request, when she was informed otherwise she dropped it. That to me says she’s not a Karen.
@@Doc-Holliday1851 in public you can record wherever you like, the owners can ask you to leave. Of course it depends on local laws but this is based off the laws of my state California. She was not requesting that she stopped being recorded, she demanded it and then questioned the USPS employee about why he was there and said her husband is in law enforcement. In my opinion they are both karens.
@@Doc-Holliday1851 the postman should have known its illegal to record someone without his or her ok even if its a public place. Dude should get fined for violating privacy
I dont know about traffic laws in America but in Germany you’re not allowed to park directly at a traffic signs like a STOP sign. There has to be some meters between the parking car and a stop sign. Same with crosswalks
I could be wrong, but I am pretty sure parking that close to a stop sign/corner is illegal in most USA jurisdictions. They're both being petty and breaking laws. lol
yep, i thought so too. a quick google shows 30 feet is common, but who know there. Would have been cool if the lady called and the cops towed his car. lol
They were both breaking the law, but the guy wasn't petty. His side of the road looked packed and with more people coming, some people would have to park in front of other people's houses anyways. He parked elsewhere out of necessity, she parked in front of their driveway out of pettiness.
@@ionymous6733 I usually just hear like one or two car lengths from the corner but then again never looked it up as try to not be in a situation where I may need to question that
The look of sheer confusion on the post office worker is hilarious. He's like "why would I borrow a strangers car whilst I'm in work? Who are you people? How did I get here?"
The first dude is a first amendment auditor, they basically dress up as suspiciously as possible and look for trouble. The post office staff also can forbid people to record.
They cannot forbid it unless they are impeding on the post office doing their job. Someone having a problem with being recorded doesn't count as an impediment because they are doing a constitutionally protected activity.
If they can forbid people from recording, why didn't they do it here? They can't, the 1st Amendment doesn't allow them to do something like that. If they did, they would be open to a lawsuit for violating an individuals civil rights.
@@putent9623 what you people proclaim things and then when someone points something out that contradicts what you said people immediately go the offended thing
@@masterchiefblank4885 that's a whole different story man, Jesus christ, I was talking about some lady in a public place, don't expect privacy in public
I would support soverign citizens more if most of the videos I've seen wasn't of them being super riled up over the tiniest issues. I have a feeling like a non insignificant amount of them are really just the most entitled and anti-social people around.
Agreed. I know people would say the first woman is a Karen, but there is nothing wrong with being asked to not be recorded and it is not like she is doing anything to warrant even being recorded, but as what was shown this guy gets a jolly off of filming until people get angry at him. It is literally his intention for filming in the first place. So he is a total dick for just wanting conflict.
the lady is going about it the entirely wrong way. this guy told her he uploads them to youtube. what she needs to do is hop onto youtube on her phone and start playing songs from like little mermaid or aladdin. Some nice disney copyrighted music. The footage will be useless because disney is diligent about copyright striking any video it can
@@Ebk-vk8px lol I'm going to get sued because I'm playing copyrighted music in public? Holy shit dude. That's literally the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Were your parents related? Because it takes a level of smooth brain that only comes from incest to come up with something so incredibly dumb.
What does having a camera inputted into your phone make everyone feel/act so much braver than they would be otherwise? It’s a cellphone, not the Force. You could be unknowingly walking into a dangerous situation.
He isn't acting brave, he's acting stupid. I bet he doesn't even try that with a camera on to someone he knows will smack the shit out of him anyways, or even gun him down
@@AlexandreG he's a 1 amendment auditor fighting for your rights dumbo, sure he could've been more professional like other auditors that's either cordial or silent
It's your right to record in public. You can record anyone when there is not a "reasonable expectation of privacy." It's totally legal! Although very cretinous and unnecessary, it's totally legal and people are able to do this. DOESN'T MEAN YOU SHOULD! -Katz vs. United States
@@autisticsponge8311 The basement part 😂 But yes, best to get consent from parents though! Also, if you’re recording yourself and your actions then it’s most likely legal as well. For instance, vlogging yourself or something of the nature and unintentionally capturing people in it is legal. Anything for personal use is legal. However if you’re recording a minor and you’re showcasing it to a bunch of people then you need consent.
@@autisticsponge8311 yes u can an many ppl do lol taking video of there kids or pic with other kids in background lol or Disney video all those ppl being record in family videos
august i found you around four days ago and i’m already hooked. your voice is perfection, your opinions are gourmet and you’re just the perfect commenter. earned yourself a new sub. continue doing what you do my man
"If you're in a public place and you're recording people and they ask you to stop and you don't......you're being an ass" Ohno August....You've just triggered all the 1st amendment auditors. I have a feeling this video will get more downvotes then usual. I fully support your opinion though!
I definitely respect everyone’s opinion, but if you’ve got a constitutional right to do it then you can do it. And by all means, do it. To allow people to think it’s okay to infringe on someone’s rights, constitutional or not, it’s terribly wrong.
That was to prove his point(she is not entitled to privacy in public and he is not entitled to her car), but he didn't expect her to comply and was too pussy to act on it. I'd take the keys and borrow the car for the day, free gas, lmao :D I mean the Karen couldn't even do anything about because she gave him the keys and he has a video proof of it.
This whole “It’s a public place so that gives people the right to record you” increases my social anxiety. Like why should that be okay? Like why is that even a rule🤣🤣 Sometimes I don’t get people……..people are strange creatures
Fun Fact: at 6:57 you can see that he parks right in front of a stop sign. In germany this would be a violation of the StvO (which are the laws when you are driving a car there) because you have to park 10 meters away or behind it so the sight isnt blocked for aproaching drivers.
Actually the second video with the guy parking in front of her house. It's technically illegal because he's parked in close proximity to the stop sign. The first video, the lady had a very valid point and I agree with her 100%. In fact she could sue him if he does not blur her out in his video before publishing. So he is in the wrong and could be fined within the context of the law.
No dumbo she cannot sue him because she's in public. Learn your civil rights dumbo it's called the first amendment. I like how you thought you knew what you were talking about
August keeps asking "why do this?" They do this because they're trying to get cops on film violating their rights and then getting fat settlement checks when they sue
The dude parking in front of neighbors house made me laugh. I used to have a lady 2 doors down who hated my car (it was a heated daily driver car and was ugly), and would complain non-stop about my car (in my own driveway). She even went to the HOA over it. So I used to purposefully park my car in front of her house and leave it there for most of the day. Drove.her f'ing crazy. And there was nothing she could do about it. My wife finally got mad at me and told me to stop antagonizing her. But in all seriousness, these people are nothing more than adult bullies, and there is only one way to deal with a bully, and that's to not put up with their BS.
"imagine you're a parent and some 40 year old is following around your child recording" come one, August, don't be that guy. Yes this guy is looking for trouble and there are things that give that away that you've already pointed out but to exaggerate a scenario to solely fit what you're saying makes a weak point and we all know you're better than that
Yeah I was stunned and after this I decided to stop watching his video. If i was trying to make the point that someone was bad by saying something as exagerated as his I would be an asshole.
I'm a total Karen when people would park in front of my house. 'Curb appeal' is a term for a reason, and someone else's car there effs it all up. Completely legal and it's just one of those things that makes me kicks rocks and grumble, but kicking rocks and grumbling is also completely legal
Definitely agree that if you are in public filming, and someone asks you not to film them and/or their kids, just be nice and don't film them. Sure, you are allowed to do it. But just be respectful. The 2nd one, the guy said something about his parents coming over. So, I can see parking on the street so tour guest can park in the driveway.
How the fuck does that first guy have 200k subscribers? Like that’s, genuinely really discouraging for any RUclipsr under that tbh. I’m glad you’re doing well August, it’s nice to see genuine rational people succeed on RUclips
Nah that first guy is ait. He was a bit unprofessional but what he does is certainly a lot more beneficial than august. You wouldn't sitt through a boring ass video explaining to you your rights so audits basically do it in an entertaining way. The guy wasn't in the wrong, in fact he wasn't even recording the lady to begin with or any person in particular. Even the guy behind the desk wasn't mad, instead it was lady who got prolly less than 5 seconds in the camera that got mad. If I walked into a store where someone was doing this I would probably think they're crazyy or smn then move on with my day, again she wasn't being particularly recorded to begin with.
@@redbigun I just wanna know do you live in the U.S? You could be the next guy police put in jail just to complete their arrest quota. You'd want anyone to record what's going down at that point to prove your innocence, right? The things we learn from seeing how our public servants work on camera, and how they act off camera is astounding. I want you to know, there was a cop that thought he was off camera, and he said out loud: "5 years ago he'd be on the ground, 10, 15, 20 years ago that motherfucker would be dead, and his teeth would be missing." They took teeth out so the body couldn't be identified as accurately. Just keep it in mind, not all cops are bad, but not all cops are good.
I'm glad RUclips doesn't charge me for likes, because August wouldn't get any of the moneys. August.. you are a hero, your work in exposing Karen's, Ken's, boomers and loonies is a public service RUclips cannot pay you enough for.
I'm totally with August on this just because you can do something and law is on your side doesn't mean you should do something, all he had to do was turn the phone back the counter and tell the lady he wasn't recording her then she would have had nothing to say. However there is no expectation of privacy when out in public.
@@Ebk-vk8px alright so whenever you're in public i'll record you, shove my camera in your face, record your family and kids, might even follow you out into the parking lot and record your car. you won't be bothered by any of it?
The second one could be a duplex, could be an extra vehicle, that other spot open could be where a roommate or wife normally parks. There are tons of reasons for it to be open. He's parking on the street and there's no reason you should have to move his car. Besides maybe a little close to the corner. Most places have 30ft away from the corner.
7:28 Both cars are parked illegally. _She_ can’t block someone’s driveway, but _he_ is parked within 25 feet of a stop sign…both would get tickets from parking enforcement. The neighborhood surrounding my university had issues with both problems.
The entire post office doesn’t deserve any customers. Like I don’t get why they allow a guy to film a woman who isn’t comfortable being on camera and they let him film her. Like she was a Karen about it but I agree why she would be annoyed. I’d be angry if someone filmed me and I didn’t feel comfortable being on there camera yet no one stopped him or he didn’t stop
Haha, you no stopping him is illegal. You could get sued, why? Because in a public place you, me or anyone else has no right to privacy. The reason why he did that was to educate little Timmys like you on your rights.
@@putent9623 so basically you’re saying that you can get sued for having mental health issues and it’s either get sued or feel more insecure about yourself if you have a really bad social anxiety?
So it's actually illegal to film in a post office for multiple reasons. The first being that you're not allowed to record in a federal building unless you are press, and get authorization from the f$ beforehand. (for example if you are part of a news station that is running a story.) The second being that a post office deals with sensitive information. The post office worker was wrong that he can record inside the post office .
The guy recording in the post office is an auditor. He flexes his 1st amendment right to film in public so that citizens can be educated. He couldve been more professional in my opinion though.
Yeah I agree. I think august take on this one was bad, august even admits himself that he just didn't like the guy, which to me sounds exactly like all those cops that gets fired in audit videos. You know the cops that illegal arrest, detain or detain just because you hurt their feelings.
It's legal to film in a post office. It's a publicly owned building. There are good first amendment auditors, and there are bad ones. The whole point is that police and other civil servants are supposed to respect people's Constitutionally protected rights, and they often don't. Now, that dude was a bit of a dick, but what he's doing has value, even if he does it poorly.
Well he has a right to record, depending on the state he does not have a right to publish a recording of someone else without their consent, even in a public place. It's not something that people usually go after but if that state requires consent, she could go after a portion of what he earned on the video
@@halofornoobs93 actually, there is no expectation of privacy in a public space, and the 1-party/2-party thing has to do with recordings made surreptitiously
what you said @ 4:20 applies to nearly every first amendment auditor these days. theyre mostly fully grown children that do it just to get a rise out of people. if you ignore them, just as you would an annoying kid, they will get bored and move on.
I love that the fat guy said the woman didnt have the right to ask the guy to not record her an as soon as the guy turns the camara to him he asks him not to record lol
He was the manager of that facility. He was saying he has the right to record in the public area. He didn't want him being a nuisance and get in the way. That's why he wanted him to move. He has that authority to ask people to quit filming if it interferes.
The first guy in this video, is a "troll" IRL The simple rule for trolls is Do Not Feed Them...if EVERYONE just ignored him, go about your business, he would have nothing to film. August is right, they are just looking for attention, if they do not get it, they will go somewhere else and/or find someone who will give them the attention they need. And the people who are surrounded by security camera's in these public places say it's somehow illegal to film them is just insane. Don't wanna be filmed... stay in your house.
@@sanfloo_ she wasn't even filmed to begin with. You guys keep on saying you'll be mad, but that's basically getting mad over someone sitting at your usual spot at school or at a park. Your getting mad over something hella petty. It's one thing is this guy was following you around or something but he was in a post office acting like a mad man, he didn't touch you, didn't talk to you barely even acknowledged you existed, bet you get mad over being on his camera for less than 2 seconds. Your being unreasonable.
No he did not, post office is public property and video recording in public is protected by first amendment. Needless to say he is not above the constitution. He can ASK to stop recording, but if he forces him to stop that opens him up for a lawsuit.
Seriously, respect other people. If someone asks you to stop recording them, just stop. Unless they’re obstructing the view of what you’re recording, you don’t need to have them in the frame.
Exactly... At worst, that could have been solved by "Dont worry Miss, Im not filming you, Im filming the post office" while keeping the recording unto what he was filming in front of him. No need to turn around, film her and say that's his right..
“You don’t have permission to record me.” She says, not even being recorded. Lady, you could’ve just.. not said anything and he’d have no reason to record you...
Yup exactly, that's why she was a Karen. There is no expectation of privacy in public. The auditor is a Karen because he is recording to look for trouble.
Hey August, i can completely understand the guy being rude isn't ok and his argument isn't on point but generally speaking if someone records, especially as an audit, it's ok. There are many law videos that say that it's fine and sometimes even recommended. And yes, i am aware that you know the law and stuff but even morally spesking he could have had multiple reasons for recording. Some of them may have been checking how professional the staff was, maybe recording to show that the package he was getting was with the post office and he has absolutely not touched it (Which a RUclipsr has done too) or maybe a more annoying "reason" which is him just expressing his right. Yes, he was a karen afterward and asking for her car made no sense. Also dragging in the employees for no reason wasn't ok and him being rude in other ways wasn't ok. They both were erong but out of the both i think the auditor was more in the right. IDK just my opinion... Edit: The second video, i agree with your POV.
I think he lost his right for “being in the right” for purposely videotaping her when she asked him not to. I really hate those types of people because I personally hate being on camera, like taken photos of/recorded, sometimes even by my friends and family. It gives me a lot of stress and anxiety, so I can totally understand situation like that. Like yeah it’s a public place, but it’s just basic human decency to not record someone when they politely ask u (tho she asked when he wasn’t even in her direction so it was weird). Not to mention that’s a post office, so it’s not somewhere u went for entertainment but had to go to.
There is no such thing as this type of audit, it is made up so they can get a video for their youtube channels. This particular frauditor is a convicted felon, he likes to abuse women and has been twice convicted of some nasty charges including attempted sexual battery.
@@bekcha4170 again, i was generally speaking and i did say both of them were wrong. I hate taking pics myself but in public, people do have a right. Even if i wanted to, I can't stop them from recording. And yes, i know it can be annoying but again, it's completely legal. Edit: I didn't say he waa in the right, i basically said he was less wrong. Also, i don't actually know if he went for fun as it seems unlikely but even if he did, while it would make him more weong but still i think the statement stands true.
First one looks like a first ammendment auditor. While he is right, and theres no expectation of privacy in a public setting, he is still being an ass.
At that point, she should have disengaged. What's the thought process of: "I don't want to be on camera, so im gonna go to the camera guy and tell him to stop recording." That's how you get put on full display, just ignore it and move on.
Part of the problem with these first amendment Auditors as most of them don't know what you actually can and can't do. Well you can record in a public place you cannot specifically record one person and if they ask you to stop and you do not, that could be considered harassment under the law
He has the right to record but depending on the state he does not have the right to publish recordings of others even in a public space. If he were to be making any money on the video she could sue for the earnings
its his right, but he's abusing it to annoy and antagonize people. he isn't "informing" people he's being a douche and telling them why he's allowed to do it. he didn't need to do any of that. you're a moron if you support that shit.
The 2nd guy parking in front of someone else's house for no reason just to cause an argument is the biggest Karen....reminds me of a neighbour i used to have....grrrrrrr
I have seen the channel before I watch this channel regularly not for the commentary not for the content simply here to see the walking duck animation nothing else. That duck is life, that duck is love.
![Quando Rondo - Grow Up [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8zFnCg3BO4Q/mqdefault.jpg)
“Everyone one sucks and no one is right” amazing quote
Ikr
Mood
Everyone one?
Cool paradox!
ruclips.net/video/dQw4w9WgXcQ/видео.html
"Don't purposely be a nuisance, just because you technically can" clear Duck-sir wisdom.
I love it "clear duck-sir wisdom
This is so true for 99% of garbage people upload on youtube. People intentionally being jerks to try and trigger an altercation so they can be the center of attention
Who knows why the guy parked his car next to her sidewalk.. bet the Karen was rude to him before this. She totally sounds like that was the case.
The whole concept of "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" seems to be getting forgotten. These are the sort of people who would book a family holiday to somalia, just because they could.
@RaXa I wouldn't be sure about that when they are the only ones who have free speech. Europe only has freedom of expression, which is not the same thing. Gets even worse with asia and socialist countries
Bruh. "You can't bark orders at people"
Also the same guy, " Give me your keys. Now give him the keys instead"
What a fail
He said that to try to show her how ridiculous she was being
He is not a 1st amendment auditor. He is a fraud, and a terrible one at that. He and people like him are the reason people call 1st amendment auditors sovereign citizens. And the fact that most people don't know the difference between the two doesn't help either. But then that's what happens when you completely fail understand the context of what you're seeing and/or hearing.
I don’t think he was serious lol why would he want her car for the day 😂
@@snakehunter8215 he was expecting her to say no to his random request, then he'd say no to her request of stopping lawful filming of the pubic. Got caught off guard by her saying to take the car granting his request and obligating him to grant hers in return so he just improv'd some random shit by saying to let the other guy take her car.
What did you expect, he's a human fail
That first guy is essentially taking the "I'm not touching you!" game to the extreme. "I'm legally allowed to film you! I'm legally allowed to film you!"
That's assholmo, immaturity & feminine lisping is his specialty.
Thats pretty much what Sovereign Citizen types do. if it wasn't what they wanted i'd beat the shit out of them for trying it.
He is also a convicted r@plst, kidnapper and omen beater
Yet he wasnt filming her at first and only did so after she started talking.
The first lady is pretty chill for a Karen, the dude is the one harassing her by trying to argue. She was being reasonable
Nah they both sucked and arguing isn't harassing. Why he should just let every person have his/her way? I wouldn't either, that said, I wouldn't record everywhere I can, just because I can. It's douchy.
if you tell other people what to do, lets say for example: Dont record me! you are really not reasonable at all:D
@@solinus83
She just asked though. If she didn’t want to be recorded, that’s reasonable since nobody wants to be recorded unless you have their permission.
@@fourearwolf3315 wrong, you dont need anybody permission to do what is allowed, and this is allowed by constitution, that means public entities, cannot make a policy in violation with constitution, like for example forbid taking pictures in publicly accessible areas.
@@solinus83 yeah it's technically legal but so is bullying my classmate I think
Karens vs Karens (male or female): What happens when an unstoppable force meets and immovable object.
Karl's and Karen's
@All i do is winn ill stop your heart
A black hole opens up and sucks everything in
You now have 69 likes
When an ignorant object meets an equally idiotic force
The first video the guy is being super rude. I feel for the woman, she actually seems like she's probably nice when she isn't being harassed by some random guy.
Yeah
1st Amendment Audits are entirely necessary to protect the civil rights of every U.S citizen.
The post office is a public area, so the 1st Amendment applies there, including the added rights that Poster 7 gives to anyone who comes into a post office to record.
Imagine if we lived in a police state, they could beat you, kill you, and nothing would happen to people in authority positions because none of it was caught on camera.
Who do you think the courts will believe? A common citizen, or a police officer? Remember, you could be the next one to get singled out and targeted. Fight for your rights.
@@MoroccanWarrior5 Bro, chill
@@MoroccanWarrior5 🙄
@@HawkeGaming I'm not doing this to be antagonistic, I just want people to think about it, you could be the next falsely convicted person to fill an arrest quota. Just food for thought: Liberty dies when we trade it for safety.
You see son, when a daddy karen, and a mommy Karen meet.. they lose their f**king minds and cops get called.
😂😂🤣🤣
If someone asks to stop being recorded (and they aren’t causing any issues and are minding their own business) they should have the right to NOT be recorded… legally they can’t do a thing in public. I just think people should be shown basic decency and respect 😩
If you only knew how much you show up on video and you don't even know it, being filmed by a random on the street doesn't even matter.
WHY THE HELL YOU SHOULD HAVE RIGHT NOT BEING RECORDED???? from what universe you came from??? ffs insane people here
How dare you ask to not be recorded, what are you thinking?!!
Decency and respect? DA FAK YOU'RE TALKING? HOW DARE YOU? WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS.. SHUT UP..
They are by educating them that's their respect
The first lady absolutely isn’t a Karen. What she asked is reasonable and when she was informed by the postmaster she let it go.
She is a Karen. I think the main thing with Karens is that you can be bothered by anything and that's ok but when you think you deserve to have what you want always (in this case to have him stop recording her) and you start acting entitled to get what you want, you are a Karen.
@@iamhereblossom1588 by law, in public you do not have the right to privacy. Which means if someone wants to record you they can (except when it reaches the point of being harassment). I like these guys because the way current day society is, is just plain delusional.
@@iamhereblossom1588 generally speaking recording someone in a building isn’t legal unless the owner of the building says it’s ok. In this instance the building is public so it’s perfectly legal, but she clearly didn’t know that. And she was ok with him filming as long as he wasn’t filming her. Once the postmaster informed her that it was legal she dropped it, which is good. She didn’t feel entitled to anything but her privacy, which she felt she was legally in the right to request, when she was informed otherwise she dropped it. That to me says she’s not a Karen.
@@Doc-Holliday1851 in public you can record wherever you like, the owners can ask you to leave. Of course it depends on local laws but this is based off the laws of my state California. She was not requesting that she stopped being recorded, she demanded it and then questioned the USPS employee about why he was there and said her husband is in law enforcement. In my opinion they are both karens.
@@Doc-Holliday1851 the postman should have known its illegal to record someone without his or her ok even if its a public place. Dude should get fined for violating privacy
I dont know about traffic laws in America but in Germany you’re not allowed to park directly at a traffic signs like a STOP sign. There has to be some meters between the parking car and a stop sign. Same with crosswalks
This is america, we measure the distance from the stop sign in chicken nuggets
@@razzy4159 The American education system has failed me. I don't know how to measure distance in chicken nuggets. D:
I could be wrong, but I am pretty sure parking that close to a stop sign/corner is illegal in most USA jurisdictions. They're both being petty and breaking laws. lol
yep, i thought so too. a quick google shows 30 feet is common, but who know there. Would have been cool if the lady called and the cops towed his car. lol
@@ionymous6733 Usually I think it's 25-30ft depending on the state, and then there's the 10ft from fire hydrants
They were both breaking the law, but the guy wasn't petty. His side of the road looked packed and with more people coming, some people would have to park in front of other people's houses anyways. He parked elsewhere out of necessity, she parked in front of their driveway out of pettiness.
@@ionymous6733 I usually just hear like one or two car lengths from the corner but then again never looked it up as try to not be in a situation where I may need to question that
I also just said this
He could have just said "okay, I won't film you directly and blur any images of you, does that sound fair?"
Or he could've remained silent like other normal mature auditors do
You're a European too? 😂
@@cosanostra5333 Nope
Fuck that shit.
Sounds like a good compromise
The look of sheer confusion on the post office worker is hilarious. He's like "why would I borrow a strangers car whilst I'm in work? Who are you people? How did I get here?"
The first dude is a first amendment auditor, they basically dress up as suspiciously as possible and look for trouble. The post office staff also can forbid people to record.
They cannot forbid it unless they are impeding on the post office doing their job. Someone having a problem with being recorded doesn't count as an impediment because they are doing a constitutionally protected activity.
Look it up if you don't believe me. Btw if this sounds like I'm being rude it is not meant to be.
Things that would be an impediment would be things like blocking customers or doorways. Things like that
If they can forbid people from recording, why didn't they do it here? They can't, the 1st Amendment doesn't allow them to do something like that. If they did, they would be open to a lawsuit for violating an individuals civil rights.
@@MoroccanWarrior5 that's what I was saying above^
2:28 the way he says You can't bark orders at strangers makes him sound like a baby
I wouldn't want someone telling me what to do
@@poopahskoopahh8563 So you would not want police officers telling you what to do whilst you held a weapon in a public place for public safety
@@masterchiefblank4885 are you mad mate? What the fuck is that. That's so extreme, completely fuckin different scenarios lmaooo.
@@putent9623 what you people proclaim things and then when someone points something out that contradicts what you said people immediately go the offended thing
@@masterchiefblank4885 that's a whole different story man, Jesus christ, I was talking about some lady in a public place, don't expect privacy in public
If only everyone was as wise as the Duck...
@All i do is winnno
Da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da ye
He is a quack
*damn even a duck is smarter than those humans.*
ruclips.net/video/dQw4w9WgXcQ/видео.html
3:10 “I’ll borrow it” 😂😂 my guy was tryna get away from the tension
I can say with enough certainty, 1st amendment auditors and sovereign citizens are always THE Karen in any situation.
I would support soverign citizens more if most of the videos I've seen wasn't of them being super riled up over the tiniest issues. I have a feeling like a non insignificant amount of them are really just the most entitled and anti-social people around.
Agreed. I know people would say the first woman is a Karen, but there is nothing wrong with being asked to not be recorded and it is not like she is doing anything to warrant even being recorded, but as what was shown this guy gets a jolly off of filming until people get angry at him. It is literally his intention for filming in the first place. So he is a total dick for just wanting conflict.
the lady is going about it the entirely wrong way. this guy told her he uploads them to youtube. what she needs to do is hop onto youtube on her phone and start playing songs from like little mermaid or aladdin. Some nice disney copyrighted music. The footage will be useless because disney is diligent about copyright striking any video it can
Good point!
That shit doesn't work dumbo a ignorant cop like you already tried that
And you can get sued because that could be interfering business of the person I they said that in court
@@Ebk-vk8px lol I'm going to get sued because I'm playing copyrighted music in public? Holy shit dude. That's literally the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Were your parents related? Because it takes a level of smooth brain that only comes from incest to come up with something so incredibly dumb.
What does having a camera inputted into your phone make everyone feel/act so much braver than they would be otherwise? It’s a cellphone, not the Force. You could be unknowingly walking into a dangerous situation.
sure but at least it will make it on to youtube
He isn't acting brave, he's acting stupid. I bet he doesn't even try that with a camera on to someone he knows will smack the shit out of him anyways, or even gun him down
None of these guys would even care about 1st amendment rights or the constitution, if it wasn't for smartphones and this scam they've discovered.
@@AlexandreG he's a 1 amendment auditor fighting for your rights dumbo, sure he could've been more professional like other auditors that's either cordial or silent
@@SeanReyesGirdle. let a pig violate your rights then come back
It's your right to record in public. You can record anyone when there is not a "reasonable expectation of privacy." It's totally legal! Although very cretinous and unnecessary, it's totally legal and people are able to do this. DOESN'T MEAN YOU SHOULD!
-Katz vs. United States
So what you're saying is that I can film children as long as it's in public? Well I guess they need a break from basement once a year or so.
@@autisticsponge8311 yeah, thats what the law says.
@@autisticsponge8311 The basement part 😂
But yes, best to get consent from parents though! Also, if you’re recording yourself and your actions then it’s most likely legal as well. For instance, vlogging yourself or something of the nature and unintentionally capturing people in it is legal.
Anything for personal use is legal. However if you’re recording a minor and you’re showcasing it to a bunch of people then you need consent.
@@autisticsponge8311 yes u can an many ppl do lol taking video of there kids or pic with other kids in background lol or Disney video all those ppl being record in family videos
"Stupid people are not annoying, they're just free entertainment"
-a wise human
"a wise human" would've used the correct form of "they're"
@@vibez8095 beat me to it 😂
You have 69 likes now
@@vibez8095 don’t know if you used “there” as sarcasm, but I’m just gonna go for it
They’re*
@@vibez8095 wut
Karen's and male karens: *our battle will be legendary*
august i found you around four days ago and i’m already hooked. your voice is perfection, your opinions are gourmet and you’re just the perfect commenter. earned yourself a new sub. continue doing what you do my man
"If you're in a public place and you're recording people and they ask you to stop and you don't......you're being an ass"
Ohno August....You've just triggered all the 1st amendment auditors. I have a feeling this video will get more downvotes then usual. I fully support your opinion though!
They can suck it.
I agree they are dicks. But I respect what they are doing. We need too exercise our rights or the government will take them away
LOL! I just caught the inference in my comment.
I definitely respect everyone’s opinion, but if you’ve got a constitutional right to do it then you can do it. And by all means, do it. To allow people to think it’s okay to infringe on someone’s rights, constitutional or not, it’s terribly wrong.
I have a constitutional right to be a dick, and by golly, I'm going to do it!
Karen’s will always be my favorite part of your channel :)
Agreed
"Our battle will be legendary"
I love ur name
@@gus7807 do u like olive oil?
@@mroliveoil yes ur amazin
5:19 bros praising American while also saluting H1tl3r
Karen logic: Walk up to a person recording & say "I don't want to be filmed"
Just, a whole new species of human life
The disgusting sub species of humans
@thx shut up
@@emmettator8673 lol
I love ur pfp
Sure human is the right word?
7:10 I feel so bad for that teen in a purple hoodie, like, imagine that being your parent.
She looks so embarrassed too.
Rip
"Finally! A worthy opponent! Our battle will be legendary!"
The guy: "I'm not gonna stop doing recording you! Oh also, can I borrow your car?"
That was to prove his point(she is not entitled to privacy in public and he is not entitled to her car), but he didn't expect her to comply and was too pussy to act on it. I'd take the keys and borrow the car for the day, free gas, lmao :D
I mean the Karen couldn't even do anything about because she gave him the keys and he has a video proof of it.
@@beardsntools She was calling his bluff. She knew he was only trying to make a point and offered the keys knowing he wasn't gonna do shit
This whole “It’s a public place so that gives people the right to record you” increases my social anxiety. Like why should that be okay? Like why is that even a rule🤣🤣
Sometimes I don’t get people……..people are strange creatures
Karen: middle aged person who thinks that they can change the world by harassing ppl .
Karen’s come in all ages.
I feel like everyone has a bit of that “Kareness” in them but some people just have more than others
No
@@acedaniels580 you are just proving my point
august doesn't
here since 10k well done my guy keep up the grind
That poor random employee.
"Give it to him."
"Why do you need it? How did you get here today?"
😨
Fun Fact: at 6:57 you can see that he parks right in front of a stop sign. In germany this would be a violation of the StvO (which are the laws when you are driving a car there) because you have to park 10 meters away or behind it so the sight isnt blocked for aproaching drivers.
We have proved that ducks are supreme to Humans, and this is our king.
@Tray Buck Aren’t Karen’s white?
AH, a Karen and a 1A auditor, match made in heaven.
lmao the post office worker "I'll borrow it". im dead
Actually the second video with the guy parking in front of her house. It's technically illegal because he's parked in close proximity to the stop sign.
The first video, the lady had a very valid point and I agree with her 100%. In fact she could sue him if he does not blur her out in his video before publishing. So he is in the wrong and could be fined within the context of the law.
No dumbo she cannot sue him because she's in public. Learn your civil rights dumbo it's called the first amendment. I like how you thought you knew what you were talking about
Male Karen? Who would've known such a beast could exist!??
Let's call them Kyle
@@CandyKitty_Doll i think theres a name for them… kevin or something
@@KindaStupid. Oh really? I didn't know that, thanks for letting me know!
@@CandyKitty_Doll np
There called Ken's... I think, im 90% sure.
We shall call them: karls
I call them Kevin's 🤣🤣🤣🤣💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼
August keeps asking "why do this?" They do this because they're trying to get cops on film violating their rights and then getting fat settlement checks when they sue
The oldest adages I remember from childhood on is, "misery loves company"!!!
"what's your name sir?" Nametag: "AM I A JOKE TO YOU?"
“Stupidity is the new pandemic.”
- someone
The dude parking in front of neighbors house made me laugh. I used to have a lady 2 doors down who hated my car (it was a heated daily driver car and was ugly), and would complain non-stop about my car (in my own driveway). She even went to the HOA over it. So I used to purposefully park my car in front of her house and leave it there for most of the day. Drove.her f'ing crazy. And there was nothing she could do about it. My wife finally got mad at me and told me to stop antagonizing her. But in all seriousness, these people are nothing more than adult bullies, and there is only one way to deal with a bully, and that's to not put up with their BS.
"imagine you're a parent and some 40 year old is following around your child recording" come one, August, don't be that guy. Yes this guy is looking for trouble and there are things that give that away that you've already pointed out but to exaggerate a scenario to solely fit what you're saying makes a weak point and we all know you're better than that
Yeah I was stunned and after this I decided to stop watching his video. If i was trying to make the point that someone was bad by saying something as exagerated as his I would be an asshole.
I'm a total Karen when people would park in front of my house. 'Curb appeal' is a term for a reason, and someone else's car there effs it all up. Completely legal and it's just one of those things that makes me kicks rocks and grumble, but kicking rocks and grumbling is also completely legal
Definitely agree that if you are in public filming, and someone asks you not to film them and/or their kids, just be nice and don't film them. Sure, you are allowed to do it. But just be respectful.
The 2nd one, the guy said something about his parents coming over. So, I can see parking on the street so tour guest can park in the driveway.
How the fuck does that first guy have 200k subscribers? Like that’s, genuinely really discouraging for any RUclipsr under that tbh. I’m glad you’re doing well August, it’s nice to see genuine rational people succeed on RUclips
Nah that first guy is ait. He was a bit unprofessional but what he does is certainly a lot more beneficial than august. You wouldn't sitt through a boring ass video explaining to you your rights so audits basically do it in an entertaining way. The guy wasn't in the wrong, in fact he wasn't even recording the lady to begin with or any person in particular. Even the guy behind the desk wasn't mad, instead it was lady who got prolly less than 5 seconds in the camera that got mad. If I walked into a store where someone was doing this I would probably think they're crazyy or smn then move on with my day, again she wasn't being particularly recorded to begin with.
Idiots will watch anything.
@@putent9623 u make no sense
@@redbigun I just wanna know do you live in the U.S? You could be the next guy police put in jail just to complete their arrest quota. You'd want anyone to record what's going down at that point to prove your innocence, right?
The things we learn from seeing how our public servants work on camera, and how they act off camera is astounding. I want you to know, there was a cop that thought he was off camera, and he said out loud:
"5 years ago he'd be on the ground, 10, 15, 20 years ago that motherfucker would be dead, and his teeth would be missing." They took teeth out so the body couldn't be identified as accurately. Just keep it in mind, not all cops are bad, but not all cops are good.
@@MoroccanWarrior5 If you want to record cops doing dirty shit, be my guest. But, Auditing America likes to be a pest to people in general.
His parking wasn’t even legal. It’s like 2 feet from a stop sign
This! His bumper would have to be in line with her driveway and even then may not even be enough room in front of the stop sign...
Legends have been told where entire universes have been destroyed in these legendary battles
The scroll of truth
I'm glad RUclips doesn't charge me for likes, because August wouldn't get any of the moneys.
August.. you are a hero, your work in exposing Karen's, Ken's, boomers and loonies is a public service RUclips cannot pay you enough for.
It's like two black holes colliding, they send waves of negative energy propagating through space-time.
It’s illegal to park that close to the stop sign. he’s in the wrong, too
Yepppp
Exactly, the guy filming say the car is parked legally. But it’s not, since it’s too close to the stop sign
I'm totally with August on this just because you can do something and law is on your side doesn't mean you should do something, all he had to do was turn the phone back the counter and tell the lady he wasn't recording her then she would have had nothing to say.
However there is no expectation of privacy when out in public.
No if you can do it by law that means you should do it because it can all change if you don't dumbo
@@Ebk-vk8px alright so whenever you're in public i'll record you, shove my camera in your face, record your family and kids, might even follow you out into the parking lot and record your car. you won't be bothered by any of it?
@@alatsus lmao you would've even be able to my boy😂
@@Ebk-vk8px sure i would, it's legal under the constitution
@@alatsus but im telling you. You wouldn't .... hint hint
We should call male Karen’s ken’s or Daren’s
I heard they are called Todds but idk
What about Maren's
I thought they were kevins
Kyle or Jim. It's a complex index based on age, dress code, and the insatiable urge to punch dry wall when they don't get their way.
The second one could be a duplex, could be an extra vehicle, that other spot open could be where a roommate or wife normally parks. There are tons of reasons for it to be open. He's parking on the street and there's no reason you should have to move his car. Besides maybe a little close to the corner. Most places have 30ft away from the corner.
7:28 Both cars are parked illegally. _She_ can’t block someone’s driveway, but _he_ is parked within 25 feet of a stop sign…both would get tickets from parking enforcement. The neighborhood surrounding my university had issues with both problems.
Aaahhh yes the Kyles vs the Karens. The biggest anime fight in history ever
I kinnda like Darren better but ok Kyle looks good
Wasn’t it Ken?
The entire post office doesn’t deserve any customers. Like I don’t get why they allow a guy to film a woman who isn’t comfortable being on camera and they let him film her. Like she was a Karen about it but I agree why she would be annoyed. I’d be angry if someone filmed me and I didn’t feel comfortable being on there camera yet no one stopped him or he didn’t stop
Haha, you no stopping him is illegal. You could get sued, why? Because in a public place you, me or anyone else has no right to privacy. The reason why he did that was to educate little Timmys like you on your rights.
@@putent9623 Why are you acting like a stan for the first guy so much?
@@putent9623 Nice. I have the right to be an ass to strangers, it seems.
@@putent9623 so basically you’re saying that you can get sued for having mental health issues and it’s either get sued or feel more insecure about yourself if you have a really bad social anxiety?
@@garmfilf2789 technically you've always had that right.
Why does he sound exactly how I'd picture a duck to sound like it they could talk
I cant get enough of your vids
So it's actually illegal to film in a post office for multiple reasons. The first being that you're not allowed to record in a federal building unless you are press, and get authorization from the f$ beforehand. (for example if you are part of a news station that is running a story.) The second being that a post office deals with sensitive information. The post office worker was wrong that he can record inside the post office .
7:40 isn't it Illegal to park in front of a stop sign?
yup
Wait, so how do Karens have children 🦇
They just appear.....
Karen trainees.
There's just this kind of guys with 0 personality nor character who love to be dominated in every aspect of life. I know a couple
The guy recording in the post office is an auditor. He flexes his 1st amendment right to film in public so that citizens can be educated. He couldve been more professional in my opinion though.
Yeah I agree. I think august take on this one was bad, august even admits himself that he just didn't like the guy, which to me sounds exactly like all those cops that gets fired in audit videos. You know the cops that illegal arrest, detain or detain just because you hurt their feelings.
he was a total asshole about it lol
august we need an hour long documentary on these creatures and their history and facts
I used to work at a restraining order clinic. Neighbors try to file restraining orders for the parking nonsense all the time.
It's legal to film in a post office. It's a publicly owned building.
There are good first amendment auditors, and there are bad ones.
The whole point is that police and other civil servants are supposed to respect people's Constitutionally protected rights, and they often don't.
Now, that dude was a bit of a dick, but what he's doing has value, even if he does it poorly.
Well he has a right to record, depending on the state he does not have a right to publish a recording of someone else without their consent, even in a public place. It's not something that people usually go after but if that state requires consent, she could go after a portion of what he earned on the video
@@halofornoobs93 actually, there is no expectation of privacy in a public space, and the 1-party/2-party thing has to do with recordings made surreptitiously
you seem to have encountered a Kyle, one of the rarer sights in the modern world
what you said @ 4:20 applies to nearly every first amendment auditor these days. theyre mostly fully grown children that do it just to get a rise out of people. if you ignore them, just as you would an annoying kid, they will get bored and move on.
Can we get more of you watching Ass-elmo? Especially the ones where he refuses to ID, then folds as soon as he's threatened with arrest?
This was on my recommendations. Glad I still get your videos!
I love that the fat guy said the woman didnt have the right to ask the guy to not record her an as soon as the guy turns the camara to him he asks him not to record lol
He was the manager of that facility. He was saying he has the right to record in the public area. He didn't want him being a nuisance and get in the way. That's why he wanted him to move. He has that authority to ask people to quit filming if it interferes.
The first guy in this video, is a "troll" IRL The simple rule for trolls is Do Not Feed Them...if EVERYONE just ignored him, go about your business, he would have nothing to film. August is right, they are just looking for attention, if they do not get it, they will go somewhere else and/or find someone who will give them the attention they need. And the people who are surrounded by security camera's in these public places say it's somehow illegal to film them is just insane. Don't wanna be filmed... stay in your house.
That Hispanic guy is really annoying.
He's an auditor my guy but a terrible one at that
The dude in the post office is mostly in the wrong. He could stop filming. I’m on her side….
Same. Tho she had better ways to go about it
That's the thing, he's not in the wrong, even workers tell the female Karen that he can film, but he's just an entitled prick with no life.
@@sergiopepe2210 if someone filmed me and was being a bitch about it I’d be pissed too
@@sanfloo_ she wasn't even filmed to begin with. You guys keep on saying you'll be mad, but that's basically getting mad over someone sitting at your usual spot at school or at a park. Your getting mad over something hella petty. It's one thing is this guy was following you around or something but he was in a post office acting like a mad man, he didn't touch you, didn't talk to you barely even acknowledged you existed, bet you get mad over being on his camera for less than 2 seconds. Your being unreasonable.
@@putent9623 yes he didn’t film her to begin with but when he openly pointed the camera to her and acted like a fool just for attention I’d be pissed
6:50, ladies and gentlemen, this is rare footage of August siding with a Karen
That postmaster absolutely had the authority to allow or disallow him to video record in the lobby.
No he did not, post office is public property and video recording in public is protected by first amendment. Needless to say he is not above the constitution. He can ASK to stop recording, but if he forces him to stop that opens him up for a lawsuit.
Seriously, respect other people. If someone asks you to stop recording them, just stop. Unless they’re obstructing the view of what you’re recording, you don’t need to have them in the frame.
Exactly... At worst, that could have been solved by "Dont worry Miss, Im not filming you, Im filming the post office" while keeping the recording unto what he was filming in front of him. No need to turn around, film her and say that's his right..
Problem is people think they can demand it.
@@lowtech81 Not to mention, he wasn't even recording her until she started lippin off.
I like to call male karens “Darens” because they are dude karens
“You don’t have permission to record me.” She says, not even being recorded. Lady, you could’ve just.. not said anything and he’d have no reason to record you...
Yup exactly, that's why she was a Karen. There is no expectation of privacy in public. The auditor is a Karen because he is recording to look for trouble.
0:11 I LOST IT😭😭. Ma'am, no one wants to suck whatever the hell you got going on down there 💀
Here in Perth WA, it is illegal to park in front of someones house without permission from the tenant or owner.
Hey August, i can completely understand the guy being rude isn't ok and his argument isn't on point but generally speaking if someone records, especially as an audit, it's ok. There are many law videos that say that it's fine and sometimes even recommended. And yes, i am aware that you know the law and stuff but even morally spesking he could have had multiple reasons for recording. Some of them may have been checking how professional the staff was, maybe recording to show that the package he was getting was with the post office and he has absolutely not touched it (Which a RUclipsr has done too) or maybe a more annoying "reason" which is him just expressing his right.
Yes, he was a karen afterward and asking for her car made no sense. Also dragging in the employees for no reason wasn't ok and him being rude in other ways wasn't ok. They both were erong but out of the both i think the auditor was more in the right. IDK just my opinion...
Edit: The second video, i agree with your POV.
I think he lost his right for “being in the right” for purposely videotaping her when she asked him not to. I really hate those types of people because I personally hate being on camera, like taken photos of/recorded, sometimes even by my friends and family. It gives me a lot of stress and anxiety, so I can totally understand situation like that. Like yeah it’s a public place, but it’s just basic human decency to not record someone when they politely ask u (tho she asked when he wasn’t even in her direction so it was weird). Not to mention that’s a post office, so it’s not somewhere u went for entertainment but had to go to.
There is no such thing as this type of audit, it is made up so they can get a video for their youtube channels. This particular frauditor is a convicted felon, he likes to abuse women and has been twice convicted of some nasty charges including attempted sexual battery.
@@bekcha4170 again, i was generally speaking and i did say both of them were wrong. I hate taking pics myself but in public, people do have a right. Even if i wanted to, I can't stop them from recording. And yes, i know it can be annoying but again, it's completely legal.
Edit: I didn't say he waa in the right, i basically said he was less wrong. Also, i don't actually know if he went for fun as it seems unlikely but even if he did, while it would make him more weong but still i think the statement stands true.
@@littledikkins2 IDK anything about this individual but i was stating this generally. And other reasons have been stated too...
why'd you edit before you even got a single reply
First one looks like a first ammendment auditor. While he is right, and theres no expectation of privacy in a public setting, he is still being an ass.
At that point, she should have disengaged. What's the thought process of:
"I don't want to be on camera, so im gonna go to the camera guy and tell him to stop recording."
That's how you get put on full display, just ignore it and move on.
She called him out while he was recording something totally different.
Part of the problem with these first amendment Auditors as most of them don't know what you actually can and can't do. Well you can record in a public place you cannot specifically record one person and if they ask you to stop and you do not, that could be considered harassment under the law
@@mikesterism767 He then focused his camera on her and antagonized her instead of putting his phone down and being an adult about it.
It’s his 1st amendment right to record he’s just exercising his rights to inform others of their rights
He has the right to record but depending on the state he does not have the right to publish recordings of others even in a public space. If he were to be making any money on the video she could sue for the earnings
its his right, but he's abusing it to annoy and antagonize people. he isn't "informing" people he's being a douche and telling them why he's allowed to do it. he didn't need to do any of that. you're a moron if you support that shit.
The 2nd guy parking in front of someone else's house for no reason just to cause an argument is the biggest Karen....reminds me of a neighbour i used to have....grrrrrrr
Right regarding the car. Good vid n tfs!
The title should be, 'Male karen records women thinking she's a Karen'
Kevin... not a very common breed, but they always pop up when you least expect it
The guy who said ‘I’ll borrow it’ when talking about borrowing her car 🤣🤣🤣
The quickest way to make me morph into a Karen is to point your phone at me while I'm in public.
I have seen the channel before I watch this channel regularly not for the commentary not for the content simply here to see the walking duck animation nothing else. That duck is life, that duck is love.
The postal workers face when the ken said let him borrow it priceless