We compare #Batman #ArkhamCity original on PC with PS4 #ReturnToArkham Remaster. If you like our videos, please support us! Like the video or subscribe us or visit us here: Candyland on Facebook: facebook.com/candylandGS Candyland on Twitter: twitter.com/CandylandGS
They seem to have made a lot of design changes, but hardly any actual graphical improvements. They just made the art style resemble Arkham Knight a bit more (loots of cyan, increased sharpness on some textures, more reflections probably to resemble wetness, etc). Yeah PC still has the edge.
To conclude PC still looks better, because the dark tone that the version has really fits the atmosphere of the game. Meanwhile the remastered one looks too bright and it's missing some shadows in certain places and sure some effects look better on the PS4 one, like the fire inside the joker's mill at 1:30 and the church's Bell tower explosion at 2:16.
I find it weird that they have opposite lighting choices for some reason. Where the PC version has shadows, the PS4 has light. Where the PC has light, the PS4 has shadows. That's odd.
@@hareeshkota8431 remaining on PS4 are low Rez garbage,low lights,medium texture and low framerate. I play on both pc and PS4. PS4 looks like Atari compared to PC
The remaster is looking way too bright.. It looks to be missing shadows in a lot of places where the PC do have shadows. And some of those new textures look worse IMO.
I think its the fog removal and the cololrs being redone and their refusal to use AA for some reason for the jagged edges. Plus the sudden increase in light sources just make everything messed up
So... One version looks better in some places, the other looks better someplace else. Overall, I don't like the new art they did for the Remaster. The character models look so ugly now and all the dark mood that came from the expert lighting in the original is thrown out the door in the Remaster. More realistic lighting does not mean better lighting. Just look at some of the cutscenes. The lighting ruins them in the Remaster. Also, PC has PhysX, resolutions past 1080p, and 60fps (makes a big difference!).
Not only that some of the textures look like shit. I can literally go to the Nvidia control panel max those settings out and it'll look better than the PS4 version
Leaderofbatz They are like umm these beams of light/light shafts. You can see them at 0:50 PS4vsPC, the PC has god rays coming through the fence and the PS4 doesn't If you don't understand me then Google Photo search god rays, then you'll see.
I noticed that the parallax maps/bitmapping/ or tessellation on the rocks have been removed from the ps4 version. Not totally sure what the technique was used in the original, but the rocks on the ground in the original game had actual depth to them like at 3:08 but are just flat on the remaster.
The PC version of Arkham City had Tessellation as an Nvidia PhysX feature, so it's not surprising it's missing in the remaster. Maybe if they'd stuck with the original visuals instead of porting to UE4 and messing with the look so much they could have gotten the PhysX stuff running on console, I always thought the paper physics in the PC version was fun.
***** Kind of wish they would've offered it on PC as like some kind of update. The lighting, texture work, and additional effects look incredible, but the fact that it's only 30 fps and lacks tessellation and physx from the original PC release is kind of a deal breaker.
How can they call this a remaster when it's clearly a downgrade, and compromises the artists original intent instead of enhancing it! If I ever "Return to Arkham" it will be on either the Xbox 360 or PC.
The remaster makes it look worse. Why did they remaster these games back then anyway? It would have made far more sense to wait until the current generation in Arkham City's tenth anniversary and to do it right.
maybe its just my eyes, but it doesn't seem like the ps4 is running a 5 year old game at 60fps... feelsbadman. As a pc player, console players deserve much more :( considering they have to pay for their own internet usage to even play online, and a non upgrade-able hardware.
This remaster appears to have a problem rendering hair. 0:47, you can see bruce's haircut edges are smoothly cut in original, as well as the infamous Hugo strange's beard and eyebrows in remastered.
Please tell me I'm not the only one who thinks that Rocksteady did wrong in removing that OG hellish Arkham City vibe just because they gave the game more "color" :(
Why is everyone so intent on PC superiority? It's a superior platform, which I use myself, but this game was rebuilt in Unreal Engine 4. There's no denying it's the superior looking game.
Im playing this on pc max settings 4k 60 fps and gotta say on pc looks better and plays better, since you get 60 fps and physics that dont exist on ps4 like moving carpets, flyers, debris its alot more realistic, like vs the penguin boss fight when he shoots freezes gun on pc the pieces of ice fall everywere making it look alot more realistic and giving that extra detail
@@lethayle3388 give me some proof then all the vids and when I played it, it didn't so u either full of shit or very low chance I'm wrong so if I am prove it
Lighting sure looks better, but textures are flat, models are almost identical (identical in most cases), it has 30fps cap and physics is not as good as what PC can offer (with physx)
***** Well you clearly misunderstood what I said. He said "lighting sure looks better" on the PS4 but looking at it you can clearly see the PC being superior interms of lighting.
*SCHLEICHWERBUNG: German Longplays - Das Videospielarchiv auf RUclips.* *Abonniere jetzt und bekomme einfach nix dafür!* Schwierige Geschichte. Die PC-Version schaut manchmal besser aus, manchmal schlechter. Das Beleuchtungsmodell könnte man auf jeden Fall per Patch angleichen. Aber warum sollte man das machen, wenn man auch eine überarbeitete Fassung für Geld vertreiben kann.
I think the remastered version looks better, although the atmosphere is gone from the old game, it still looks a lot better, lighting and texture wise. I think people are saying the lighting looked better in the old game because they used way too intense lighting to hide low resolution textures. I think they have fixed that and now people are complaining about it. I mean this always happens with remastered games. It is worth it if you ask me, even if you have the older games. Unless you have the older games with the dlc, the remaster is worth it. The remaster includes all dlc so it is definitely worth it.
Note that the pc was release back then. The pc nvr got a remastered version because it already had the best graphics at that time. However since arkham city was release quite a while back now, the game had to be remastered and since software are improving it allows the remastered version to get more depth and contrast look to their colors and geometry. If pc were to have a remastered version, it top off the remastered console’s version.
Ps4 remaster definitely looks a bit nicer with its shaders, such as fire, neon and water, but the lighting seems a lot flatter in the remaster, and character models have lost their depth, especially in the skin textures. The moody feel of the original is also lost, now it looks more like arkham knight, which doesn't match the almost low tech, dark and cold experience that Arkham City offers. Looks a little prettier, but has lost its atmosphere and some lighting contrast.
there's aspects of this that does look better but a lot of it doesn't. mostly just texture wise that looks better and the explosions/fire seem improved. the lighting though seems to have missed the bar a bit. i noticed the same with asylum.
+kodemasterx I don't care what you say, PC players are usually hatefull people. And I will stick to device where I can play Uncharted series and hundrets of other exclusives for consoles. Where were you when we were playing Red Dead Redemption? Playing LOL, CS, DOTA or that kind of game with beautiful graphics?
+Martin Kolafa "Hundreds of exclusives"? How about thousands of exclusives on PC? Don't listen to crapgamer...you can't take him seriously...this dude is a no life. And you just mentioned 3 games which console palyers can't enjoy....which is a shame....everybody should have access to all games...console exclusives only create artificial demand for consoles which represent bad corporate practices (PS Plus/Xbox Live :( there's not a single reasonable argument to defend this) and also consumer behavior (Preorder/Season Pass/DLC/Ingame Purchases).
I don't know if it is on old consoles or on next gen consoles, but look at this carpet on PC version while Catwoman stands on it 😍 It moves so real, and I like this kind of details 🥴
The Pc Has Better Atmosphere Model Detail that doesn't break the feel of the game and Better Depth of Field the Other Game Has More Clarity Incredibly High Details And Better Specular Lighting, Rain and Fire Shaders
ps4 version I can see has better Ambient Occlusion and some subtle features that the PC doesn't or old consoles like the light house emitting light, but fps is locked and draw distance is fuck'd, there seems to be what looks like a potato on 2:03 on the PS4 side. all in all PC is great but the PS4 is better in a small percent.
Looks amazing. Much better lighting, draw distance and more detailed textures. All those dark and washed out colors from the original were there to hide those lowrez textures. UE4 sure does have more bells and whistles however some of the colors chosen are a bit too bright. Love the remaster cape. Looks great. Overall a good effort too bad it was not at 60fps. The extra snow & physx detail do make the remaster look a bit more jampacked with background stuff than can get distracting.
The first impression is the PS4 version much brighter and have more vivid colors. But certain lights are better. Also certain surface reflections added. Seems Catwoman suit replaced with AK version, or a really high-res version of the original. Still, PC version has 60 fps and PhysX.
Please make a comparison between Black on the PS2 vs XBOX? I know it's a fairly old game, which will never get a sequence or not even a remaster but I know a lot of people who never heard of it. When I look it up online, even emphasizing "PS2" on my search it still asks if I meant "Black Ops PS3". Thanks in advance. :)
They say lighting can make something fake look real well this is certainly true with batman arkham knight remastered one looks like toys while the other looks thematic
I went through a minute of this video without reading the title...thank God it was PC Original!....then I realized they weren't releasing one for the PC :(
Honestly the batman in the remastered version looks better compare to PC is more dark-ish IMO, overall graphics the remastered has some part better than the pc not entirely, but i still prefer the PC version. Edit. Everything looks shinier and brighter, and less foggy in the remastered version, not a big difference.
I mean like the PS4 remastered version looks good but it's laggy. While the original one looks normal ( okay ) but it's quick and not laggy. The remastered should update the framework to make it quicker and smoother, and I think they should re-update the remastered version
really mixed bag here for me cause some of the effects and textures look better on PS4 but you cant beat the consistency of frames and it still looks amazing on PC.
The PS4 Lighting is def fucked but the textures and the game looks way better than PC. The only problem i have with remasters is that now it feels like devs don't have to try anymore and that they can release a game from 5 years ago with better graphics and get praise from a ton of people for it. This is a dangerous proposition that means the devs can just release old games and still get money rather than make original games. So for me, i would just get the old PC version and get a mod so it maybe looks like PS4 with lighting fixes.
Coming from the maxed PC version the new textures are great. Motion blur would have helped a lot for these games though. Not to mention better AA. Virtuous are morons but I am having fun playing through Arkham City again.
Also die Beleuchtung haben sie ja mal mehr als verkackt, die neuen explosionen/feuereffekte sehen aber besser aus, die texturen enfach nur anders... Und das fehlende parallax occlusion mapping auf dem boden ist eienr unverschämtheit...
This right here is the proof that performance will always be more important than graphics and PC is the best platform to get it. Period. The remaster looks pretty on consoles but it performs terrible, and the original PC version still looks amazing while having a smooth performance. Now, this is a console remastwer, the only time when consoles may look better than PC, but in every game out there even a mid range PC will look and perform better than consoles. I'm glad we have the option for games like this but console exclusives kill awesome games with poor peformance. If only Uncharted 4 was playable on PC.
Idk why, even tho some lighting and textures on the ps4 version of indoors have improved the pc version resembles the eerie environment of Arkham much better. The PC version feels like 'fuck, Arkham is really scary' but when i switch to ps4, it's like 'ehhh, nice graphics improvement tho'
PC did better than PS4 on quite a few things like Catwoman and the skyscraper environment, the door and cutscenes look more crisp and sharp. The remaster wasn’t thought out too much sadly such weird lighting effects on PS4 . Arkham asylum was very good but Arkham City feels so slow on fps and very bad environment loading
Crazy, there is really a lot of hate for pc players here, but only thing. All the Arkham series has been remastered on console and not touched the pc at all, So we need someone to have ago of modding the graphics and show them our Arkham remaster on pc
Console version: advanced Bloom, accurate colors, some textures are actually better, screen space reflections, more light sources, better water effects, better fire effects, more advanced shadow. PC version: advanced Godrays, advanced physics, 60FPS, more particle effects, advanced DOF, advanced ambient lighting, better AO and higher quality shadows. Conclusion: The remastered PC version is the winner!
The textures look better in the remastered version, but the lighting is better in the old version.
dont forget nvidia physix
no its not you can see it in the video that the pc have it and the ps4 not
have to disagree there, i like the new lighting much better. But whatever, your opinion lmao
Volumegod everything but the character models look better
@@TheGr0nch The way you said that is so weird, just think about it. "Your opinion, laughing my ass off" is it really so funny that it's their opinion?
We compare #Batman #ArkhamCity original on PC with PS4 #ReturnToArkham Remaster.
If you like our videos, please support us! Like the video or subscribe us or visit us here:
Candyland on Facebook: facebook.com/candylandGS
Candyland on Twitter: twitter.com/CandylandGS
They seem to have made a lot of design changes, but hardly any actual graphical improvements. They just made the art style resemble Arkham Knight a bit more (loots of cyan, increased sharpness on some textures, more reflections probably to resemble wetness, etc).
Yeah PC still has the edge.
which works for arkham knight but not arkham city
PC looks so trash here
@Tacitus G. Kilgore when your platform has stuff up there with bloodborne and god of war then I will give a 💩 what you have to say
@Tacitus G. Kilgore yeah bro that PC game showcase from a few days ago definitely had some quality 💀
@Tacitus G. Kilgore that 💩 was laughably bad and deserved the backlash it got
Dark Knight vs Bright knight :D
lol
Both of you Alive since your last comment
@@killakame-3434let's come back here in another 5 years and see lol
@@Tigeradvenchrer i think they died
@@killakame-3434 What about you two
To conclude PC still looks better, because the dark tone that the version has really fits the atmosphere of the game. Meanwhile the remastered one looks too bright and it's missing some shadows in certain places and sure some effects look better on the PS4 one, like the fire inside the joker's mill at 1:30 and the church's Bell tower explosion at 2:16.
That Cat Woman looks more plastic and unreal compared to the old PC version. Which goes to show that remasters aren't always better.
Imadeyourun All the characters looks weird in the remaster. I don't know what they did, but the faces are really screwed.
X Leonhart Yeah, some of them look either freaky or high af.
They screwed up the lighting on the faces, I think. The way the light catches their pores, it's so "flat" in the remasters.
Harsha Mohite Yeah, that's gotta be it, lol.
Eyy idc how they look like if you are a batman fan you wouldd play this no matter how bad it is
I find it weird that they have opposite lighting choices for some reason. Where the PC version has shadows, the PS4 has light. Where the PC has light, the PS4 has shadows. That's odd.
Still would bang PC version catwoman
fair enough
PC = 60fps, Physx, Higher resolutions and HD mods available online.
PS4 = New Textures and meh lighting quality.
Go fuck yourself. Pc looks like shit
@@hareeshkota8431 No it doesn't, Console Fanboy. Open your eyes or go back to your locked framerates and worse graphics than PC.
@@hareeshkota8431 look at Catwoman on PS4, looks like a PS2 game compared to pc
@@manuelcampi8956 look at the remaining pc looks like Gameboy compared to ps4
@@hareeshkota8431 remaining on PS4 are low Rez garbage,low lights,medium texture and low framerate. I play on both pc and PS4. PS4 looks like Atari compared to PC
The remaster is looking way too bright.. It looks to be missing shadows in a lot of places where the PC do have shadows.
And some of those new textures look worse IMO.
William Larsson "30 Fps"
I think its the fog removal and the cololrs being redone and their refusal to use AA for some reason for the jagged edges. Plus the sudden increase in light sources just make everything messed up
Ambient Oclusion SSAO PS4 x HBAO+ on PC
That PhysX man!
And i don't like they change Catwoman costume. Also it is wierd some scene better on the old version than the remastered one.
So... One version looks better in some places, the other looks better someplace else. Overall, I don't like the new art they did for the Remaster. The character models look so ugly now and all the dark mood that came from the expert lighting in the original is thrown out the door in the Remaster. More realistic lighting does not mean better lighting. Just look at some of the cutscenes. The lighting ruins them in the Remaster.
Also, PC has PhysX, resolutions past 1080p, and 60fps (makes a big difference!).
Are your cutscenes locked at 30 frames on the pc version or is it just me? Maybe it's because I'm using enb.
@@jacksonelh there are in-game cutscenes and pre-rendered cutscenes. Which one you were refering to?
RIDDICK0911 in game ones, like the conversation with Mr freeze after you free him from the pod. my issue is solved now though.
The beautiful dark atmosphere!!! It's gone 😱😢
Not only that some of the textures look like shit. I can literally go to the Nvidia control panel max those settings out and it'll look better than the PS4 version
Look at those beautiful nvidia physx
PC wins instantly
try utra graphics mod with nvida physx = GOD graphics 20% arkham knight styled graphics mod
Luke shouldn't the remaster look better tho
rohit sanyal yeah but they won’t spend over a year for details in a remaster they already know how hard it would be
The remaster has Nvidia PhysX too
@@itzmrinyy7484 no it does not bro gosh
Why'd they remove the god rays. I always liked god rays.. :C 0:50
Neighbour Vadim That is also my biggest problem with this 'remaster'
A vid does not showing god ray doesn't mean it has not, actually AC ue4 does have god ray, just buy/borrow/whatever one for yourself.
Neighbour Vadim What are god rays?
Leaderofbatz They are like umm these beams of light/light shafts. You can see them at 0:50 PS4vsPC, the PC has god rays coming through the fence and the PS4 doesn't If you don't understand me then Google Photo search god rays, then you'll see.
It's because they are too taxing on performance.
I noticed that the parallax maps/bitmapping/ or tessellation on the rocks have been removed from the ps4 version. Not totally sure what the technique was used in the original, but the rocks on the ground in the original game had actual depth to them like at 3:08 but are just flat on the remaster.
The PC version of Arkham City had Tessellation as an Nvidia PhysX feature, so it's not surprising it's missing in the remaster. Maybe if they'd stuck with the original visuals instead of porting to UE4 and messing with the look so much they could have gotten the PhysX stuff running on console, I always thought the paper physics in the PC version was fun.
***** Kind of wish they would've offered it on PC as like some kind of update. The lighting, texture work, and additional effects look incredible, but the fact that it's only 30 fps and lacks tessellation and physx from the original PC release is kind of a deal breaker.
How can they call this a remaster when it's clearly a downgrade, and compromises the artists original intent instead of enhancing it!
If I ever "Return to Arkham" it will be on either the Xbox 360 or PC.
Do you know what remaster means?it doesnt mean better faces it means better resolution and this remaster totally has it
Lolol how funny😐
The remaster makes it look worse. Why did they remaster these games back then anyway? It would have made far more sense to wait until the current generation in Arkham City's tenth anniversary and to do it right.
maybe its just my eyes, but it doesn't seem like the ps4 is running a 5 year old game at 60fps... feelsbadman. As a pc player, console players deserve much more :(
considering they have to pay for their own internet usage to even play online, and a non upgrade-able hardware.
dahosta1 it's 2016 remastered version not 2011
hahahah! rekt console subscription, ISP pay only PC FTW!!
dahosta1 your life must be sad 😥
why because he sated the facts and said you deserve more? Your life must be sad if that triggers you
I feel bad for PC gamers, because... well ... you know .... your playing video games on a fucking computer. That's wierd man
This remaster appears to have a problem rendering hair. 0:47, you can see bruce's haircut edges are smoothly cut in original, as well as the infamous Hugo strange's beard and eyebrows in remastered.
Please tell me I'm not the only one who thinks that Rocksteady did wrong in removing that OG hellish Arkham City vibe just because they gave the game more "color" :(
TheTRUTX rocksteady didn't even do this
Im a pc player myself, but come on guys, the remaster definitely looks better. Sadly its capped at 30fps which is a bummer
The remaster just have a filter lmao like every remaster from this days
Use sweetfx and you get the PS4 version. I don't like the changes to lighting they made for the remaster.
you must be blind or something
Nope. And 30 fps is pathetic. Even my piece of shit PC manages 55 at high graphics settings.
Why is everyone so intent on PC superiority? It's a superior platform, which I use myself, but this game was rebuilt in Unreal Engine 4. There's no denying it's the superior looking game.
3:46 ok
Has anyone else seen the kiss at 0:38? :O
Im playing this on pc max settings 4k 60 fps and gotta say on pc looks better and plays better, since you get 60 fps and physics that dont exist on ps4 like moving carpets, flyers, debris its alot more realistic, like vs the penguin boss fight when he shoots freezes gun on pc the pieces of ice fall everywere making it look alot more realistic and giving that extra detail
3:27 for the love of god, where's the ambient oclussion there? PS4 looks like crap.
You can even see the wood textures better in the original version
1:43
Everybody pays attention to the tube, but look at the wall right next to it xD
Wtf good thing I have a pc it looks so much better
4:37 let's add addition light sources, it's not ugly enough yet
A 5 years games still 30fps with no obvious graphical improvement, good job WB
It's console limitation
Holy crap the carpet moves in the PC version. That's so cool
It does in the ps4 version as well if you move on it.
@@lethayle3388 no it don't lmao
@@CoCo.-_- It does. I've tried it.
@@lethayle3388 give me some proof then all the vids and when I played it, it didn't so u either full of shit or very low chance I'm wrong so if I am prove it
@@CoCo.-_- I know I’m 1 year late but it does lol
@3:51
WHAT HAPPENED to Catwoman? Lul
Console mustard race
Lordish Darth pc insecure lonely race
HOF Sheamus
I'm a console user, you dumb fuck lol
console mustard because your console can even make ketchup ;) 0:50
@SEIF 13 you can easily mod them and get way better visual with lights
Lighting sure looks better, but textures are flat, models are almost identical (identical in most cases), it has 30fps cap and physics is not as good as what PC can offer (with physx)
03:25 "Lighting sure looks better" What are you smoking?
***** Well you clearly misunderstood what I said. He said "lighting sure looks better" on the PS4 but looking at it you can clearly see the PC being superior interms of lighting.
Felipe Aidar da Silva actually it's not capped at 30fps on the remastered, it runs uncapped.
I like both versions and have played both but, 70-80 fps, 4k, is just to good to pass up.
Now, we know a few things.
1:consoles are 2 cool for shadows
2:they like looking like a bad greenscreen effect.
Environments - 10 / 10
Character models faces - 1 / 10
pc still bester than ps4 with 60fps
*SCHLEICHWERBUNG: German Longplays - Das Videospielarchiv auf RUclips.*
*Abonniere jetzt und bekomme einfach nix dafür!*
Schwierige Geschichte. Die PC-Version schaut manchmal besser aus, manchmal schlechter. Das Beleuchtungsmodell könnte man auf jeden Fall per Patch angleichen. Aber warum sollte man das machen, wenn man auch eine überarbeitete Fassung für Geld vertreiben kann.
Consoles: Better texture
PC: Better lighting
0:51 Hair looks way less convincing.
I think the remastered version looks better, although the atmosphere is gone from the old game, it still looks a lot better, lighting and texture wise. I think people are saying the lighting looked better in the old game because they used way too intense lighting to hide low resolution textures. I think they have fixed that and now people are complaining about it. I mean this always happens with remastered games. It is worth it if you ask me, even if you have the older games. Unless you have the older games with the dlc, the remaster is worth it. The remaster includes all dlc so it is definitely worth it.
3:47 - HA-HA-HA, WHAT THE FUCK?!
Note that the pc was release back then. The pc nvr got a remastered version because it already had the best graphics at that time. However since arkham city was release quite a while back now, the game had to be remastered and since software are improving it allows the remastered version to get more depth and contrast look to their colors and geometry. If pc were to have a remastered version, it top off the remastered console’s version.
Ps4 remaster definitely looks a bit nicer with its shaders, such as fire, neon and water, but the lighting seems a lot flatter in the remaster, and character models have lost their depth, especially in the skin textures. The moody feel of the original is also lost, now it looks more like arkham knight, which doesn't match the almost low tech, dark and cold experience that Arkham City offers. Looks a little prettier, but has lost its atmosphere and some lighting contrast.
there's aspects of this that does look better but a lot of it doesn't. mostly just texture wise that looks better and the explosions/fire seem improved. the lighting though seems to have missed the bar a bit. i noticed the same with asylum.
PC is still the better version.
Ed Turvey much lag
You are blind.
PhysX wins sorry,
+kodemasterx I don't care what you say, PC players are usually hatefull people. And I will stick to device where I can play Uncharted series and hundrets of other exclusives for consoles. Where were you when we were playing Red Dead Redemption? Playing LOL, CS, DOTA or that kind of game with beautiful graphics?
+Martin Kolafa "Hundreds of exclusives"? How about thousands of exclusives on PC? Don't listen to crapgamer...you can't take him seriously...this dude is a no life. And you just mentioned 3 games which console palyers can't enjoy....which is a shame....everybody should have access to all games...console exclusives only create artificial demand for consoles which represent bad corporate practices (PS Plus/Xbox Live :( there's not a single reasonable argument to defend this) and also consumer behavior (Preorder/Season Pass/DLC/Ingame Purchases).
Honestly some of the cutscenes look shitty on the remaster but the actual gameplay is pretty sick.
I don't know if it is on old consoles or on next gen consoles, but look at this carpet on PC version while Catwoman stands on it 😍
It moves so real, and I like this kind of details 🥴
No PhysX on PS4
The Pc Has Better Atmosphere
Model Detail that doesn't break the feel of the game
and Better Depth of Field
the Other Game Has More Clarity
Incredibly High Details
And Better Specular Lighting, Rain and Fire Shaders
ps4 version I can see has better Ambient Occlusion and some subtle features that the PC doesn't or old consoles like the light house emitting light, but fps is locked and draw distance is fuck'd, there seems to be what looks like a potato on 2:03 on the PS4 side. all in all PC is great but the PS4 is better in a small percent.
Its a mix sometimes Ps4 is better sometimes Pc is better.....some textures are better on pc and i think lighting is better also.
Looks amazing. Much better lighting, draw distance and more detailed textures. All those dark and washed out colors from the original were there to hide those lowrez textures. UE4 sure does have more bells and whistles however some of the colors chosen are a bit too bright. Love the remaster cape. Looks great. Overall a good effort too bad it was not at 60fps. The extra snow & physx detail do make the remaster look a bit more jampacked with background stuff than can get distracting.
Candyland Please GTX 1050 VS GTX 1050ti
thanks candyland
Saying thanks to your self is good ?
Rogue Gamer are u OK bro ?
Wong Jowo Gaming
Save the extra money and get a 1060 6gb
+Trazerade Is 1080 worth almost twice the price of 1070?
the lights are slightly better in the remastered but overall the PC is better.
It's just lighting and textures that have been improved.
The first impression is the PS4 version much brighter and have more vivid colors. But certain lights are better. Also certain surface reflections added. Seems Catwoman suit replaced with AK version, or a really high-res version of the original. Still, PC version has 60 fps and PhysX.
Yea yea PS4 looks better but performs like shit. Don't you see the frame rate issues??
TheRockDevil I heard there doing another update to fix that
Please make a comparison between Black on the PS2 vs XBOX? I know it's a fairly old game, which will never get a sequence or not even a remaster but I know a lot of people who never heard of it. When I look it up online, even emphasizing "PS2" on my search it still asks if I meant "Black Ops PS3". Thanks in advance. :)
The only issue with the remaster is how they’ve rendered the hair tbh...
dayum background music so teasing makes me wanna install all batman again.......*thrill* #suspense #epic
They say lighting can make something fake look real well this is certainly true with batman arkham knight remastered one looks like toys while the other looks thematic
I went through a minute of this video without reading the title...thank God it was PC Original!....then I realized they weren't releasing one for the PC :(
Oh god look at batman's cape at 1.51, why doesn't the remaster have PhysX. :'(
So pretty much they slightly made it look better in some area's over a version on PC from 5 years ago....
look at the rug on the pc in the first seconds
The only thing better about this is Catwoman's suit. Not even her face, just the suit
I'm just glad Rocksteady left us with a very good PC version of Arkham City. Even now the 5 year old PC version trades blow with the new PS4 version.
Honestly the batman in the remastered version looks better compare to PC is more dark-ish IMO, overall graphics the remastered has some part better than the pc not entirely, but i still prefer the PC version.
Edit.
Everything looks shinier and brighter, and less foggy in the remastered version, not a big difference.
I mean like the PS4 remastered version looks good but it's laggy. While the original one looks normal ( okay ) but it's quick and not laggy. The remastered should update the framework to make it quicker and smoother, and I think they should re-update the remastered version
Textures only thing,which better on ps4.
***** i know)
Actually PC textures are more high quality
nop. ps4 looks better
USMAN HUSSAIN calm down bin laden
PS4 VERSIONS TEXTURES MIGHT LOOK LIKE BETTER BUT THEY ARE LOW QUALITY SHIT
4:33 Rich batman vs. Poor batman :V
catwoman is even sexier
0:39 Kiss Of Death
Was the person holding the controller having a spasma attack or what
really mixed bag here for me cause some of the effects and textures look better on PS4 but you cant beat the consistency of frames and it still looks amazing on PC.
The PS4 Lighting is def fucked but the textures and the game looks way better than PC.
The only problem i have with remasters is that now it feels like devs don't have to try anymore and that they can release a game from 5 years ago with better graphics and get praise from a ton of people for it. This is a dangerous proposition that means the devs can just release old games and still get money rather than make original games.
So for me, i would just get the old PC version and get a mod so it maybe looks like PS4 with lighting fixes.
I already got the arkham games on pc, confused abt the remastered version! ! its still 30 fps right!?
I like both not gonna say which is better because they are meant to be different with higher standards on both sides
This game is older than the PS4 itself, yet it’s capped at 30 FPS?
Coming from the maxed PC version the new textures are great. Motion blur would have helped a lot for these games though. Not to mention better AA. Virtuous are morons but I am having fun playing through Arkham City again.
Bought the return to arkham pack on sale but couldn’t play on ps4. Can’t stand the 30 fps and lack of anti aliasing. Only on pc these ones
PS4 version looks better than the older version running on PC. But the PC does look a lot smoother and that stands out a lot.
Just wanna highlight saying a game runs 4k at 120fps is different to saying YOU can run said game at 4k 120fps
Also die Beleuchtung haben sie ja mal mehr als verkackt, die neuen explosionen/feuereffekte sehen aber besser aus, die texturen enfach nur anders... Und das fehlende parallax occlusion mapping auf dem boden ist eienr unverschämtheit...
Are they going to do another Skyrim Remastered comparison?
Jacob Sartorius hopefully
This right here is the proof that performance will always be more important than graphics and PC is the best platform to get it. Period. The remaster looks pretty on consoles but it performs terrible, and the original PC version still looks amazing while having a smooth performance. Now, this is a console remastwer, the only time when consoles may look better than PC, but in every game out there even a mid range PC will look and perform better than consoles. I'm glad we have the option for games like this but console exclusives kill awesome games with poor peformance. If only Uncharted 4 was playable on PC.
Idk why, even tho some lighting and textures on the ps4 version of indoors have improved the pc version resembles the eerie environment of Arkham much better. The PC version feels like 'fuck, Arkham is really scary' but when i switch to ps4, it's like 'ehhh, nice graphics improvement tho'
PC did better than PS4 on quite a few things like Catwoman and the skyscraper environment, the door and cutscenes look more crisp and sharp. The remaster wasn’t thought out too much sadly such weird lighting effects on PS4 . Arkham asylum was very good but Arkham City feels so slow on fps and very bad environment loading
My pc with integrated graphics ran arkham city at 60 fps whereas my ps4 was crap.
The light is like the only thing better on the remasterd version
Crazy, there is really a lot of hate for pc players here, but only thing. All the Arkham series has been remastered on console and not touched the pc at all, So we need someone to have ago of modding the graphics and show them our Arkham remaster on pc
something tells me consoles will be beta testers of Red Dead Redemption 2...
Console version: advanced Bloom, accurate colors, some textures are actually better, screen space reflections, more light sources, better water effects, better fire effects, more advanced shadow.
PC version: advanced Godrays, advanced physics, 60FPS, more particle effects, advanced DOF, advanced ambient lighting, better AO and higher quality shadows.
Conclusion: The remastered PC version is the winner!
`the pc version is not remasterd is the same one released before ps4 even existed...
It still has better effects.
Why Return To Arkham don't have physx effects?
NO they did it in da borderlands 2 PC on AMD
The backgrounds look much better in the remaster, but they screwed up the characters, they look so bad in the remaster.
What video card is the pc using ?
This game can run in a low spec
Joao Vitoria actually it ran very good for me, with a GTX 950 and all maxed out. Arkham city is the best of all arkham series so far.
SO THIS IS A GAME LIKE 5 YEARS OLD VS A NEW GAME?
ps4 looks better, but physx is so cool...
Graphics look better on the remaster. I think i would prefer 60fps over the new graphis to be honest.
It's hard to say which one is better...
I me, yes is bad but thanks to this remastered i will be able to play these ps3 era games not only on ps4, but also on ps5